GROWING FORWARD - 37 St. GLENDALE ROSSCARROCK WESTGATE - Rosscarrock Community Association
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
GROWING FORWARD Ostap Fedynets Taylor Felt Edward Spink Planner Planner Planner 10 Ave 37 St. GLENDALE Ostap Fedynets FEDYNETS ROSSCARROCK Taylor Felt Edward Spink WESTGATE FELT SPINK PLANNING + DESIGN
TABLE OF CONTENT Table of Contents 2 Meet our Team Community Change 4 8 Our Process History and People 2 10 12
Public Feedback Parks and Open Space 16 20 Laneway Housing Land Use and Zoning 32 34 Mobility and Connectivity Public Transportation 54 60 Active Transportation References 64 76 3
A REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE MEET OUR TEAM FOR COMMUNITY GROWTH Data and experience driven community design. FFS Planning + Design is With a strong foundation disrupting the planning and in greenfield and regional design space within Calgary planning, our boutique firm has by offering clients something championed innovative design unique: a form-based approach to solutions for central Calgary’s community and regional planning. Pumphouse Park, the Spyhill 01 Master Planned community in north Calgary, and advised the Calgary Metropolitan Regional Board in the development of a long range regional growth management plan. We’re excited to leverage that experience towards a new community plan. 4
Ostap Fedynets, Planner Taylor Felt, Planner Edward Spink, Planner Ostap is a second year Master of Planning Taylor is a second year Master of Planning Edward is a second year Master of Planning student at the University of Calgary. With a student at the University of Calgary. His student at the University of Calgary. With an Bachelor in Arts in Philosophy and Human Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and undergraduate degree in Biological Scienc- Geography, he has an interest in planning Business has created an interest in public es and Sociology, he is interested in the environmental interventions from a systems engagement, policy and planning law. Taylor intersection between public health, urban perspective. Ostap brings experience recently completed a 4-month internship design, affordable housing, and mobility. As hand-drawn graphics and planning with Sustainable Calgary, where he con- the Environmental Design Students’ Asso- implementation. In his volunteer work with ducted a morphological analysis of how to ciation president, Edward has experience the Spruce Cliff and Bowness Community enhance active transportation networks in with project management and stakeholder Associations, Ostap has experienced low-income communities. engagement. managing and commenting on new developments in established communities, as well as two forms of the Main Streets project. 5
GLENDALE ROSSCARROCK EXPERIENCE CALGARY AS IT WESTGATE SHOULD BE. BO W TRA IL SARCEE TRAIL COMPLETE CONNECTED CALCULATED 45 ST 7 17 A Best Great Good Fair Poor
Initial Buildout. 12000 declining population. time to choose: WHY DO COMMUNITIES CHANGE? 11000 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 It’s time for the neighbourhood to make a choice: stay the 5000 course or revitalize. population 4000 3000 2000 This is a model for the way dwindle. 1000 communities rise, fall and 1948 1958 1968 1978 1988 1998 2008 2018 2028 revitalize which has been 2038 The businesses begin to struggle sum total Glendale westgate rosscarrock -2465 - 21% -1156 - 30% -1150 - 27% -159 - 4% supported by both real world as their customer base shrinks. cases and the literature. A choice has to be made. “As the initial stages of a new Option 1: Stay the Course development near completion, The first sign of decline is the first buyers begin to move in. when the school shuts down. Typically, these first residents With enrollment dropping, the are young families or young neighborhood kids are diverted couples planning to start a into a new school in one of the family. Over the first twelve nearby communities. years the houses and streets begin to take shape and the Option 2: Revitalize first children begin to grow up. The first sign of change is when The neighborhood will reach its a couple of residents subdivide peak population at the end of its their lots. Developers buy a second decade. Over the next number of lots and convert sixteen years, the neighborhood them to row houses. The streets kids start to trickle out. come alive, the schools fill back up, and businesses once again With the kids gone, and no thrive” (City of Edmonton, Infill new homes available for young Roadmap 2018). 8 families to take their place, the numbers in the schools start to
DRIVERS OF CHANGE Time Lifecycle Finance After a lengthy engagement the City has determined that 50% of future population growth should be housed in the existing Calgary footprint, with most this in already established areas. This is partially due to the constraints placed upon municipal finance by increasing low density development to the exterior. These modes of development simply do not generate enough tax revenue to pay for themselves and must currently be subsidized by the downtown core. LRT Engagement Demographics The massive investment of the LRT demands an increase in ridership and is very attractive to downtown workers, triggering redevelopment pressure. The diverse populations demands a variety 9 of housing and transportation options.
THE COMMUNITY DESIGN PROCESS. The Stages and Steps of Established Area Planning This section illustrates an Next, we explore the natural abbreviated explanation of our and historical context of the Community Design process. Our three communities, tracking firm sees these phases as vital environmental data, growth rates components of any successful and housing change. plan. It should be noted that this process is not necessarily We explore stakeholder opinions linear - the design stage reveals on growth and change in order information gaps which then to shape the initial design, and demand further analysis. display a draft design for review and feedback. A review of the legal framework will provide constraints for the Finally, we provide our design and ensure that the completed community project aligns with the hierarchy recommendations via of plans. presentation and report. 10
1 2 3 4 Community Associations City of Calgary Businesses Current and Future Residents As our project involves The City has a vested interest Businesses in the area would like Current residents are a diverse partnering with the Federation in seeing a more financially to see a larger customer base, group, a range in median of Calgary Communities, the and socially sustainable form better access to their locations income, housing tenure, age, community associations of of development, and more via active transportation and less ethnicity and occupation. The Glendale, Rrosscarrock and ridership for the two area LRT restrictive City land regulations. plan will address current needs 11 Westgate are the main client. Stations. and respond to the future.
03 COMMUNITY CONTEXT. 1911 1949 1964 1966 Rosscarrock - the Tregillus ranch West Calgary “ Country Resident” The #8 Killarney trolley bus Westbrook Mall opens (1964), 12 house, located at 37th Ave. and prior to annexation for future reached 45th St. SW and 17th. including a branch of the Calgary Bow Trail. community development. Ave. Public Library.
THE HISTORY OF PEOPLE AND PLACE “Calgarians . . . would fail ignominiously in their duty did they not look at least a hundred years ahead.” William John Tregillus in the Morning Albertan (1911) 1982 2007 2012 2019 7th Ave. Drive-In transitions Ernest Manning School Calgary’s first underground LRT Area sees infrastructure im- to Westgate Heritage Manor demolished and construction of Station is complete. provements along 17th Ave, 37 13 Housing Coop Ltd, development Westbrook Station begins. St. and a new pedestrian over- increases along 17th Ave. pass across Bow Trail.
The majority of Westgate rest, the difference in form is DEMOGRAPHIC and Glendale’s housing stock is still from the 1950s while unsurprising. While Glendale and Westgate are mostly Rosscarrock has significantly Bungalows, Rosscarrock has a ANALYSIS renewed. The age of housing is closely related to the population variety of housing types and a large amount of 1.5 storey up- fall. This map also highlights a down duplexes. As expected, few potentially historic homes this redevelopment has not in the area. Given this age gap resulted in lowered property Ageing homes on high value land. between Rosscarrock and the value. Building Age Property Value 0 - 1919 1920 - 1929 1930 - 1939 1940 - 1949 1950 - 1959 1960 - 1969 1970 - 1979 1980 - 1989 1990 - 1999 2000 - 2009 2010 - 2018 No Data $74 500 - $399 999 $400 000 - $699 999 $700 000 - $899 999 $900 000+ 14 0 0.125 0.25 KM 0.5 KM 0 0.125 0.25 0.5
g value e change llin 598K alu +30% 3 COMMUNITIES. we g v d glendale glendale lin an dwel 551K +29% Medi 3 DIFFERENT rosscarrock rosscarrock 2011-2016 2016 550k +28% westgate STORIES. westgate 450K +7% Calgary calgary k oc rr Westgate and Glendale are largely homogeneous in form and s ca 22 .4 population. Rosscarrock is younger, poorer and has less families. Age and Income s gl ro en ld da e eho Unsurprisingly, the communities account for the younger age. le 32 siz ous 20 016 11 2 experiencing most of the popu- Calgary, which is on average When looked at more closely, h 3 2 .6 we . 4 lation drop are the oldest. Also only two years older - earns $35 the lowest earners seem to be st t 2 .6 connected to age are median 000 more. All communities have . leaving the communities. It’s ga 26 incomes. The younger crowd in experienced serious income likely that the second highest y e yc Rosscarrock has a significantly growth in the last 8 years. This wage group is moving farther lower income, even if we do has not kept pace with housing out where they can get more cost rise. square footage for their money old income n Age - while the top income owner eh come growth Media population is growing. us 107K in +28% y 39 t glendale Westgate o uni Westgate old On the age side we see a nh 100K 39 comm househ +23% Media huge rise in millenials, which Calgary calgary Glendale corresponds to the large 37 2016 98k +18% increase in rental distribution. 2016 016 westgate scarrock calgary And the population of kids is 2011-2 ros 65K +16% 35 only rising in Rosscarrock, again showing that it’s attracting rosscarrock Glendale rosscarrock young executive couples. 15
COMMUNITY 04 FEEDBACK. 16
ENGAGEMENT PROCESS AND TIMELINE. An inclusive and responsive planning process. Public engagement is a vital way for residents to share their portion of any community day to day experiences with the planning process. Residents, team. business owners and developers have unique knowledge of the It also isn’t a commandment areas strengths, weaknesses, or proclamation. At FSS we threats and opportunities. allow our team to use their This information provides education and unique planning our planners with additional experiences to make evidence- considerations they have to take based choices and designs. into account in order to create a Community residents will be successful plan. heard and their concerns will be noted. Should the plan need to At FFS Planning + Design, move in a another direction, this engagement is not a check-the- change will be explained. box activity. It is a meaningful PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASE 6 Background Analysis Engagement Design Design Review Final Report Engagement! Engagement! Engagement! Focus Groups Jan. 28 Workshop March 2 Open House April 13 17
COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED denser streets amenities access westbrook Mall Shared use Path proximity mass transit parking OPPORTUNITY amenities 18 cycling routes
COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED affordability perception housing stock rec centres infrastructure park ‘n ride barriers safety CONSTRAINT Schools traffic volume 19
ENVIRONMENT Outdoor Rink, Glendale Community Association, Calgary ENVIRONMENT, PARKS & 05 OPEN SPACE Re-imagining connected parks and open spaces that are exciting destinations for everyone in the community. Glendale, Rosscarrock, and now is the time to enhance these Westgate, are situated at the green spaces, improved active center of a triangulation of parks transportation connections, and open space. This includes and invest in diversifying and regional parks, Optimist Athletic improving the urban forest Park, and neighborhood parks. for the current and futures 20 Douglas Fir Trail, Edworthy Park, Calgary As pressure for redevelopment residents who will call these increases in the communities, communities their home.
1 2 3 4 Open Space Plan Developed Areas Guidebook Tree Protection Plan Urban Forest Managment The Open Space Plan is a non- One of three guidebooks The purpose of the Tree The City of Calgary provides a statutory policy document that that are part of the Municipal Protection Plan is to prevent comprehensive database of geo- outlines the general framework Development Plan, the DAG sets damage to public trees caused referenced public and private and broad policies regarding a broad policies to be followed by development work on, near, tree species that make up the open space in the City of when creating high quality, or crossing City property. city’s urban forest: https://maps. Calgary. connected, parks and open calgary.ca/TreeSchedule/ 21 spaces in Local Area Plans.
CONNECTING PARKS AND EDWORTHY PARK GREEN SPACE. LOWERY GARDENS Tying into an area well serviced by regional parks and open space. The Mattamy Greenway is a The communities are serviced multi-use pathway running by many regional, community, parallel to Sarcee Trail on neighborhood, special purpose SHAGANAPPI the west side of Glendale (such as Optimist Athletic Park POINT GOLF and Westgate. The Greenway and Shaganappi Point Golf COURSE provides a connection to Course), and subneighbourhood Edworthy Park, a regional parks (referred to as ‘pocket destination for families to parks’ by the communities). OPTIMIST recreate, the Bow River Pathway Through our engagement and the Lowery Gardens. The session and observations PARK Bow River Pathway runs along within the community, we the south bank of the Bow found that many of these parks River and ultimately connects are disconnected and often to downtown Calgary. Many underutilized. The objective members of the communities of FFS Planning and Design consider the pathway as a safe is twofold, to first create a and efficient way to cycle to connected parks and open space Q. What are the outside work. The Lowery Gardens are concept through a network of connected by the ecologically green corridors that encourages resources and amenities your significant Douglas Fir Trail to Shaganappi Point Golf Course. active transportation (walking and cycling) and secondly to community should connect to? Despite being a public golf program these spaces in a course, owned and operated by way that draws people back to the City of Calgary, Shaganappi these places, all year round. By A. Edworthy Park and Shaganappi Point is a popular destination for addressing these two issues we community members to enjoy can create active and vibrant Golf Course! 22 free access to cross-country parks for all Calgarians to enjoy. skiing in the winter.
THE URBAN FORREST. FILLING THE GAPS. 2 The urban forest does not just GIS, a spatial analysis tool, we were contribute aesthetic value to able to generate a map determining 1 the urban landscape, but also where there are gaps (trees more provides other countless benefits than 6m apart) within the urban and ecological services. Trees forest to direct tree planting improve air quality, offer visual initiatives. The City of Calgary and auditory screening, retain recommends planting street trees storm water, provide shade, no closer than 6M apart to ensure and create safer pedestrian and a tree’s roots are not overcrowded cycling environments within the and competing for resources. community. Our strategy is to On the following page, (1) 40th connect the parks and open spaces Street SW., has a low number across the communities through a of public street trees, an overall network of green corridors. comment on the density of trees in Rosscarrock. Our team has curated Our initial analysis examined the a list of species that are resilient existing tree coverage across to Calgary’s short and dry growing the three communities. In doing conditions, that are not impacted Trees 6m this, we found that Rosscarrock by chinooks, and are tolerant to the currently has less than half the hardy conditions of urban street number of trees as Glendale. Using life, such as salt and pollution. 23
SHADE Brandon Elm Dropmore Linden Balsam Poplar Trembling Aspen Birch 1 Ulmus americana Tilia x flavescens Populus balsamifera Populus Tremuloides Betula papyrifera ‘Brandon” ‘Dropmore’ FLOWERING FRUIT AND 40th Street SW., Calgary, Crabapple Ussurian Pear Mayday Princess Kay Plum Malus Pyrus ussuriensis Prunus pradus var Prunus nigra ‘Princess Kay’ commutata 2 CONIFEROUS 7th Ave. SW., Rosscarrock, Calgary, Tamarack Norway Colorado Latrix laricina Spruce Spruce Green spaces need to be more diverse and higher quality - SHRUBS not just grass but also trees, Meye’s Dwarf Lilac Prickly Rose Saskatoon Potentilla Syringa meyerii “Palibin” Rosa acicularis Amelanchier alnifolia Potentilla food trees, shrubs, furniture and interesting landscaping. - member of the community GRASSES (March 4th, 2019, community workshop) Moor Grass Blue Fescue Rough Fescue Molina caerulea Festuca ovina glauca Festuca campestris https://www.calgaryplants.com/collections/trees INVASIVE 24 SPECIES https://www.calgarytrees.ca http://www.insideeducation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/TreeShrub.pdf https://www1.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Documents/Planning-and-Operations/Tree-Management/landscape-specs-trees. Creeping Bellflower Yellow Cematis Wild Caraway pdf Syringa meyerii “Palibin” Clematis tangutica Carum carvi
GREEN CORRIDORS. Connecting green spaces with active green corridors. In conjunction with the coupled with a designated bike recommended street tree lane. Spanning the entire length replanting initiative, FFS of the communities, connecting is proposing greening the Optimist Athletic Park and the communities through a series Glendale Community Centre, of connected green corridors. to the 45 Street Station LRT, These corridors would seek the Rosscarrock Community Bike Fa- to layer high-quality active Association, and three school Protected Bike Lane transportation infrastructure sites, 45th Street will act as Painted Bike Lane with a targeted street tree the main arterial for the green Shared Bike Lane planting program along 45th corridor network. With 13th Mattamy Greenway street, 8th avenue, 13th avenue, Avenue, 8th Avenue, and Green Corridors Westwood Drive, and Spruce Westwood drive, feeding into 45 Drive (located outside the focus Street, the network will provide communities) to complete a greater and safer access to the connected parks and open space communities’ parks and open network. The selected corridors spaces. will be planted with species from the recommended tree palette, 45th Street kissing canopy 25 Urban Tree Canopy - 8th Street NE. Calgary, AB.
ENHANCE THE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE THROUGH ACTIVE PROGRAMING. Drawing the People Back to the Parks. Our team created a palette (right) to aid the communities in implementing improvements to their parks and open spaces with the intention of drawing people back outside and building community. Each number on the adjacent map correlates with an improvement item on the palette. Overall, many of the pocket parks require basic urban furniture to provide visitors with a place to rest and dispose of their waste. Additionally, FFS prioritized programming and activating the parks connected to the proposed 45th Avenue green 26 corridor. The following pages we will illustrate our firm’s vision for the 3 selected parks outlines in red.
PARKS PROGRAMING PALETTE. 1 2 3 4 Urban Furniture LED Lighting - University of Waste & Recycling Receptacles - Seating - Brooklyn Bridge Park, Bike storage - Cleveland, OH Calgary Bryan Park, NY 5 6 7 Vegetation Community Gardens - Parkdale, Xeriscaping - Osgood Public Urban Forest - 9the Ave. NE, Calgary, AB Garden, ON Calgary, AB 8 9 10 11 12 Activities Outdoor Fitness Pavillion - Rice Accessible Play - Shouldice Natural Playground - Mills Park, Spray Park - Shrewbury, UK Outdoor Curling Rink - Beltline, University, Houston, TX Park, Calgary, AB Calgary, AB Calgary, AB 13 14 15 16 17 Special Community Oven Pavillion - Pump Park - Edson, AB Dog Park, Agility Course - East Artisan Gallery - Bow Valley Disc Golf - Brundage Mountain, 27 Vermilion, AB Village, Calgary, AB Ranche, Calgary, AB
1 2 Community Oven Apple Orchard 3 4 Bus Shelter Community Gardens North Productive Park Bring the community together with food! This park was re- imagined with raised garden 28 boxes, an apple orchard, and a 7 6 5 community oven.
Agility Course Splash Pad Fenced Dog Run Central Bark Park Currently, the communities are not serviced by a dog park. The nearest designated dog parks are located at the Edworthy Off Leash Park and the Strathcona Park Off Leash 1 3 5 Area. From our analysis, observations, and feedback gathered from the community, the desire for a space that owners can recreate with dogs was clear. Our proposal suggests incorporating an urban dog park in the space directly north of the West Heritage Manor Housing Coop. The park will feature an agility course, an off leash run, splash 2 4 6 pad, and spaces for owners to rest and relax. Seating Area 7 Rest Area 8 29
Movie in the Park 1 Seated Lookout 2 Disc Golf 3 Multi-use Pathway 30 4
Turtle Hill Improvements To enhance connectivity, FFS recommends removing the chain-link fence on the west end of the park bordering Optimist Athletic Park and connecting the area with a multi-use pathway. Programming the space with low impact activities such as a disc golf course will draw more activity to the park. Curling 5 Bioswale 6 31 7
BO LANEWAY HOUSING. W ROAD SARCEE ROAD 0m 4m 80 LANE LANE Amenity Space: the minimum Parking: At a minimum, there 17 AVE allowable distance between must be 1 parking stall for the the primary dwelling and the LWH and 1 parking stall for the BYS must be no less than main dwelling. We recommend 37 ST 4m. Upper level decks should directing parking to the rear of 0m orient towards the laneway the property and do not encour- 80 and include a visual screen to age on street parking. residential lane protect neighbours privacy. 26 AVE LRT ROAD Our vision is to offer diverse and affordable housing choices in the ROAD communities through a backyard suite (BYS) strategy. Our vision is influence by the MCDA (pictured above) that indicated the most suitable land for redevelopment is within 800m of an LRT station. This also offers an opportunity to live a convenient and accessible lifestyle without a car. In supporting incremental change and gentle LANE LANE density throughout the communities, FFS recommends that BYS be a permitted use in RC-1, R-C2, R-C1s, and R-CG designations, within 800m of LRT stations. Outside the 800m radius of an LRT station, Height & Massing: the BYS must Access: the BYS must abide by FFS recommends BYS be a discretionary use. Backyard suites within not be taller than the primary the minimum setbacks assigned 800m of an LRT station will not be required to meet the parking dwelling. Upper levels must not to the main dwelling: 1.2m from minimum of 1 designated stall per BYS. Suites must have direct exceed 60% of the footprint of the side property lines, and access to a back lane or back lane and side street. There must not the BYS. Suites must include a 1.2m from the rear property 32 be more than one suite located on a property. The following page main living space (living room line. This provides a pathway in outlines our recommendations for backyard suites guidelines. and/or kitchen) on the ground the event of a fire. floor.
1. Lighting 2. Vegetation 3. Amenity Space Sides of the suite facing the lane must include Owners should preserve existing trees on their lots Suites should include outdoor amenity space in the exterior lighting, such as a porch light. To prevent when considering a BYS. At a minimum, 1 of the backyard and/or an upper level deck. Upper level light pollution, lighting should be directed downward. following must be included in the BYS landscaping: decks must face the rear lane and include a screen or Consider ground lighting and LED solar garden lights a shrub, tree, hanging baskets or garden boxes. blind to protect neighbours privacy. as a way to illuminate the lane and increase safety at Vegetation adds character and creates a vibrant night. laneway. Take this as an opportunity to transform the laneway into an attractive place. 4. Parking 5. ‘Lane’scaping 5. Overlook 1 parking space must be provided for the primary Including landscaping and additional lighting into your Main floors must include at least one window facing dwelling and 1 for the BYS, for a total of two parking laneway home can transform the lane into an inviting the lane. The bottom of additional windows located spaces on the property. Suites that are located within and activated space. Consider permeable paving along the sides of the suite must be located 2 meters 800m of an LRT station do not require a parking space where possible. from the ground, this will allow sunlight in and protect for the backyard suite. Living in close proximity to neighbours privacy. 33 primary transit offers an affordable alternative to owning and maintaining a car.
Initial Buildout. declining population. time to choose: 12000 11000 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 population 4000 3000 2000 1000 1948 1958 1968 1978 1988 1998 2008 2018 2028 2038 sum total Glendale westgate rosscarrock LAND USE -2465 - 21% -1156 - 30% -1150 - 27% -159 - 4% WHY CHANGE ANYTHING AT ALL? 06 Established communities are a dynamic landscape. Glendale, Rosscarrock and These factors, coupled with the Westgate began their initial build close proximity to downtown, out in the mid to late 1950s. has resulted in significant Since then their population has redevelopment pressure. risen, and as young families Redevelopment is a complex turn to empty nesters, has process. Unlike greenfield declined. While the housing forms development there are multiple reflect the original residents, existing stakeholders that need changing national and municipal to be balanced and an existing 34 demographics no longer policy landscape that needs to be accurately mirror the community. analyzed and responded to.
amended december 2005 Developed Areas Guidebook pOlicy Guidelines Westbrook Village Area Redevelopment Plan TransiT OrienTed Municipal Development Plan: Volume 2, Part 3 develOpmenT call 3-1-1 calgary.ca MUNICIPAL DEVELOPED TRANSIT-ORIENTED WESTBROOK VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT AREAS DEVELOPMENT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDEBOOK GUIDELINES PLAN Policy Considerations for Glendale, Rosscarrock and Westgate: The Municipal Development This document outlines the goals TOD is a regional solution Westbrook Station, as the only Plan is Calgary’s long term for filling in Calgary’s established addressing the financial, social underground LRT station in vision for growth. It sets a 50/50 communities. 17th Ave. and and environmental problems Calgary in an established, high split between new and existing 37th St. fall into it the Corridor of increasingly spread out amenity area, represents the communities as a response to classification as designated Main urban development. These are highest potential TOD site in population growth. Some of this Streets and are therefore required guidelines for housing types and Calgary. This ARP plans for a high growth will be accommodated by to intensify as part of the overall commercial uses around LRT rise urban form just south of the urban corridor intensification. municipal strategy. stations. LRT with TOD conditions. 35
CURRENT ZONING WHERE DO WE DIRECT BO W TR A REDEVELOPMENT IL PRESSURE? SARCEE TRAIL Policy provides the direction while data directs outcomes. 45 ST After exploring the relevant community redevelopment policy documents, our team Suitbaility Map. decided to undergo a more quantifiable community design This map then goesC-COR1 on to shape process. While organic planning our proposed residential and C-COR2 ! is strong in terms of flexibility, commercial zoning changes, ! it was deccided that data driven C-N1in our policy considerations 17 AVE design would allow for a clearer terms of parking relaxations C-O and connection between site analysis community amenity bonusing, and proposed solutions. as well as our laneway DC housing strategy. R-C1 For this process, our team leveraged its spatial analysis R-C1s experience in ArcMap software C-COR1 R-C2 and conducted a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. This results C-COR2 R-CG 26 AVE in a map which combines the C-N1 M-CG assigned considerations into one C-O M-C1 values map, generally showing a N spatial hierarchy. We combined DC M-C2 KM current community planning R-C1 MU-1 36 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 best practices and current municipal policy to create a R-C1s MU-2 R-C2 S-CS R-CG S-R M-CG S-SPR M-C1 S-CRI
DEVELOPMENT SUITABILITY 01 BO W TRA IL 02 BO SARCEE TRAIL W 10 min min 10 TRA 10 min 7 min IL 45 ST Current Zoning 5 min 7 min LRT Proximity 5 min Westbrook LRT ! ! ! 45 Street LRT ! ! 17 AVE SARCEE TRAIL 26 AVE N KM 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 KM 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Current Zoning (5%) and LRT Proximity (45%) Land use amendments are an expensive and sometimes contentious process. Zoning however is generally flexible so this category received the lowest weighting. LRT proximity received the highest as proximity to this resource is a major factor influencing use, form and density, and response to policy. 45 ST 03 04 BO W TRA IL 17 AVE Property Value Corridor Proximity 37 ST Best ! Great ! ! 17 AVE Good $75K - $399K $400K - $699K $700K - $899K Fair $900K+ Poor KM 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 KM 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Property Value (35%) and Corridor Proximity (15%) 26 AVE In accounting for property value, the MCDA accounts for the difficulty of land acquisition in development, and acts as a proxy for parcel size. Larger parcels are more attractive for redevelopment. As designated Main Streets 37th St. and 17th Ave SW are targetted by 37 policy documents for increased density and public realm investment.
PROPOSED REZONING R-C1 BO W TRA WHAT URBAN FORM DO WE WANT? R-C1 IL SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 Growing up, not out. 45 ST R-C1 As the MCDA identifies the buildings on the outskirts of the greatest development potential communities. within a 5 minute walk of the ! LRT Stations in theC-COR1 communities, Residents also maintained that as well as along 17th and 37th, heights of 3-5 stories were C-COR2 ! these are the areas which will acceptable in these areas. ! C-N1 need to accept the majority From a complete community 17 AVE of the density increases. C-OThis perspective, these responses is also echoed throughout delegate an urban form that our public enagagement, DC provides a mix of uses, housing 37 ST R-C1 where current resdients R-C1noted and transportation choice much more support for taller in close proximity to the LRT R-C1s Stations. R-C2 C-COR1 R-C2 For this purpose, zoning these C-COR2 R-CG sites MU-2, MU-1 and MC-2 C-N1 M-CG largely achieves an urban form C-O that responds to policy, public M-C1 feedback, demographic analysis. R-C1 R-C2 N DC M-C2 This would result in mixed use R-C1 MU-1 buildings of 4-6 storeys directly 38 KM 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 beside the 45 Street LRT Station, R-C1s MU-2 and taller beside Westbrook. R-C2 S-CS R-CG S-R M-CG S-SPR M-C1 S-CRI
R-C1 R-C1 R-C1 BO BO BO W W W TRA TRA TRA R-C1 IL R-C1 IL R-C1 IL SARCEE TRAIL SARCEE TRAIL SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 R-C2 R-C2 min 10 45 ST 45 ST 45 ST R-C1 R-C1 R-C1 7 mi n 5m in ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 17 AVE 17 AVE 17 AVE 37 ST 37 ST 37 ST R-C1 R-C1 R-C1 R-C2 R-C2 R-C2 26 AVE 26 AVE 26 AVE N R-C1 R-C2 N N R-C1 R-C2 R-C1 R-C2 KM KM KM 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 3 4 Low Density Residential Neighbourhood Station Area Town Center Station Area Laneway Housing Overlay In order to keep the To create a vibrant, complete We aim to create a more transit Increasing the population suburban character of these community and capitalize on supporting community around can also be done through neighbourhoods alive, the the LRT, a smaller scale TOD has Uptown at Westbrook. The goal encouraging more backyard majority of the new zoning been zoned around 45th Street is to add to its consumer base suites. This allows existing maintains the existing RC-1 LRT Station. This precinct also and contribute to LRT system owners to age in place and 39 designation in the community extends along 17th Ave. ridership. capitalize on value increases. interior.
Low Density Residential Housing Typology Currently housing in the communities is largely 1960s era 1.5 storey Bungalows or new skinny infill homes. This low variety does not accurately respond to area demands or demographics. An increased supply of fourplexes and row houses will move new options from the $800k+ pricepoint to $450k+. This matches median incomes. rc-1 rc-2 rC-G RC-1 RC-2 Neighbourhood Station Area Housing Typology Mc-G mc-1 mc-2 rc-1 rc-2 rC-G Moving from the automobile supported low density typologies, these medium density forms are currently poorly connected and scarce. Closely connected to transit by active transportation infrastructure, they’ll include purpose built rental to mitigate gentrification and allow some residents to age in place. Mc-G mc-1 mc-2 40 MC-1 CCOR-2DC Mu-1 mu-2
Mc-G mc-1 mc-2 Town Center Station Area Housing Typology This area represents a novelty in Calgary. In accordance with the aggressive TOD conditions attached, the Uptown at Westbrook concept is focused on maximal transit use. Major parking minimum relxatations and confirmed active transportation investments along 37th will support a lively mixed use live, work, play precinct. Mu-1 mu-2 DC DC MU-2 Laneway Housing While our land use strategy does place most of the higher density redevelopment along Main Streets and in close proximity to the LRT, the interiors of the 3 communities will also need modest intensification strategies that will allow for expanded housing options. Lane-way housing, also known as garden and backyard suites accomplishes this purpose and mitigates the parking concerns that come with basement secondary suites. Our team has developed a comprehensive guideline which covers design, form and distribution. 41
R-C1 LOW DENSITY BO W TR A RESIDENTIAL PRECINCT R-C1 IL SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 Maintaining community character while providing more options. 45 ST R-C1 While additional density has experiencing significant largely been moved to the redevelopment pressure at exterior, community interiors its northern edge, with a large ! require specific strategies in number of RC-1 toC-COR1 RC-2 re- order to create a complete designations. community. C-COR2 ! ! The block structure ofC-N1 17 AVE This precinct allows for the Rosscarrock allows for C-O maintenance of a low density much easier redevelopment housing pattern, but expands integration, and is whereDC the 37 ST the housing options available. most intense redevelopment R-C1 is R-C1 This will likely have positive currently taking place. affordability and community R-C1s R-C2 renewal benefits, and further C-COR1 R-C2 improve the consumer base for businesses. While low C-COR2 R-CG 26 AVE school enrollment is a current C-N1 M-CG challenge, these housing forms C-O M-C1 are attractive to families and R-C1 R-C2 N are therefore a response to that DC M-C2 challenge. R-C1 MU-1 42 0 0.125 0.25 KM 0.5 Currently, Westgate is R-C1s MU-2 R-C2 S-CS R-CG S-R M-CG S-SPR M-C1
R-C1 R-C1 01 02 BO W BO TR A W R-C1 IL TRA R-C1 R-C1 IL SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 1 SARCEE TRAIL R-C1 R-C2 2 BO W TRA 8 AVE R-C1 IL 45 ST R-C1 BO 1 SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 W 45 ST R-C1 TR A R-C1 IL R-C1 BO Double Trouble and Row House Row W TRA ! R-C1 IL 2 SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 ! 45 ST SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 ! ! 17 AVE R-C1 Our plan recommends rezoning Westgate north of 8th Ave and west of 45th St to RC-2 as currently 40% of parcels have already been 3 ! rezoned from RC-1. We envision ! a Row House lined8 AVE corridor for 8th 37 ST Ave given its proximity to schools, R-C1 greenspace and use for17 AVE cycling. 45 ST R-C1 ! 45 ST R-C2 03 04 37 ST R-C1 ! R-C1 ! ! 26 AVE 17 AVE 3 ! ! R-C2 4 R-C1 R-C2 17 AVEN 37 ST R-C1 26 AVE 4 0 0.125 0.25 0 ! 37 ST R-C1 R-C2 R-C1 R-C2 N R-C ! ! KM 26 AVE 17 AVE 0 Around the Corner and Main Street Transition 26 AVE 0.125 0.25 0.5 R-C1 R-C2 N R-C1 R-C2 N The pedestrian scaled blocks in Rosscarrock should allow for more 37 ST affordable density, and permit row houses on all corner parcels. To 0 0.125 0.25 R-C1 0 0.125 0.25 KM 0.5 buffer the density of 17th Ave, 3 storey fourplexes and row houses 43 would create a gradient from the 4 storey multifamily homes. R-C2
POLICY: LOW DENSITY Parking and Commercial Uses RESIDENTIAL 8. Where highlighted within the Low Density Residential Precinct Map, commercial land uses shall have no parking minimum in order to encourage community pedestrian use. 9. Neighborhood scale The aim of these policies is to provide more housing options, the front facade of the house. commercial uses shall have a modestly increase density and preserve character. sales area not greater than 1800 4. In the Row House Row Area, square feet and shall provide 1. Land use re-designations must 2. In no case where a parcel has front setbacks shall be limited to an indoor or outdoor non-sales be consistent with the zoning lane-way access shall a front a maximum of 2 meters in order area of no less than 400 square classifications identified on the drive garage be permitted. to create a closer street wall. feet. Low Density Residential Precinct Map. 3. In no case shall a front drive 5. Where a building with an 10. If an RC-G parcel is within garage extend beyond the front existing front driveway is being 400m (as the crow flys) of an facade of the house. front redeveloped, the driveway shall LRT Station Entrance or 200m not be retained on lots with rear of a shared use or protected lane access. cycling path, the parcel shall be provided a 50% parking 6. Any parcel zoned RC-2 with relaxation. two existing up-down units shall have Row Houses as a permitted 11. 10. If an RC-G parcel is within use, provided the parcel has rear 800m (as the crow flys) of an lane access. LRT Station Entrance or 400m of a shared use or protected 7. Main Street Transition cycling path, the parcel shall shall provide landscaped be provided a 25% parking 44 underground parking access relaxation. through the lane.
45
R-C1 NEIGHBOURHOOD BO W TR A STATION AREA PRECINCT R-C1 IL SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 min 10 A smaller scale Transit Oriented Development. 45 ST R-C1 7 mi n This area represents the largest surrounded by MC-G and change from the existing RC-G zoning, which will likely 5m in community condition, and result in 3 storey buildings. As ! arguably the greatest challenge Rosscarrock is already building C-COR1 for the area. The LRT functions up to 2-3 storey single family as a considerably barrier. dwellings, they do C-COR2 not require as ! ! long a transition. C-N1 17 AVE The solution is a more permeable, active transportation C-O Glendale’s non-grid structure serviced mixed use node with DC requires a smoother transition 37 ST higher residential densities zone with interventions beyond R-C1 R-C1 around the LRT. Given this just land use. areas current issue with traffic R-C1s R-C2 and shortcutting, these higher C-COR1 R-C2 intensity uses must be offered non-private automobile options. C-COR2 R-CG 26 AVE The train accomplishes this, as C-N1 M-CG does the shared use path along 17th Ave. C-O M-C1 R-C1 R-C2 N DC M-C2 In order to create a smoother R-C1 MU-1 46 0 0.125 0.25 KM 0.5 transition to the surrounding community the node is R-C1s MU-2 R-C2 S-CS R-CG S-R M-CG S-SPR M-C1
R-C1 5m in BO W 01 TR A R-C1 IL R-C1 1 SARCEE TRAIL ! R-C2 BO W TRA ! IL 2 R-C1 SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 45 ST Mixed Use Station Area R-C1 7 mi n 45 ST R-C1 7 mi This is the primary location for transit supporting commercial uses n R-C1 and residences. A 6-7 storey landmark building is envisioned for the current AMA site, surrounded by 4-5 storey5 m mixed use. 3-4 storey 5m in in multifamily residential connects to the surrounding communities. ! 1 02 ! ! 2 17 AVE ! ! 17 2 37 ST R-C1 26 AVE 37 ST R-C2 R-C1 26 AVE 17th Ave SW Main Street Residential R-C1 R-C2 R-C1 R-C2 N Medium density residential surrounds the mixed use node at the 45 Street LRT Station. As these heights are north of Glendale and would 0 0.125 0.25 KM 0.5 face the street, negative shadowing and privacy is mitigated. 47 26 AVE R-C1 R-C2
POLICY: NEIGHBOURHOOD Community Amenity Bonusing STATION AREA Each participating community association is asked to submit a list of 5 desired and rank ordered amenities. These may include public art, park infrastructure, tree planting, street furniture, etc. The intent of this policy is to create a urban form which allows 5. Front parking is prohibited in Development which falls within the equal opportunity use of various modes of transport. new developments on 17th Ave. the 400m parking relaxation Parking should be underground zone may elect to provide either 1. In order to improve the public 3. New buildings on 17th Ave, and accessible from the lane- in part of in whole, any of the realm and active transportation should be built to the front prop- way. listed amenities. If this proposal potential of 17th Ave, new drive- erty line. Exceptions granted for is ratified by the Community way curb cuts are prohibited. patio space. 6. Buildings labeled MU-1 or Association, the development is MU-2 on the precinct map shall eligible for 1 additional FAR to a 2. Large automobile oriented 4. Parcels across the LRT Station provide lane-way access to limit of 2 FAR. sign-age is prohibited. must provide a mix of uses. parking. Development which falls within a) a 75% relaxation to the the 800m parking relaxation parking minimum specified by zone may elect to provide either the LUB is permitted: in part of in whole, any of the listed amenities. If this proposal i) if the parcel or parcels is ratified by the Community touch a 200m (as the crow Association, the development is flys) radius drawn from an LRT eligible for 0.5 additional FAR to Station Entrance. a limit of 1 FAR. i) and the parcel is zoned for MU-1 or MU-2. Selected Amenities should be in 48 the Best, Great, Good areas of the MCDA Map.
17 aVE rc-1 LRT proposed section 21m 18m 14m 17 aVE 11m 10m rc-1 mc-1 Mu-1 Mu-2 Mc-1 rc-G rc-1 17th Avenue represents existing section a considerable challenge. The Right of Way from the LRT represents a barrier to cross 17th Ave from the north and south. As a designated main street, single storey bungalows across from 17 aVE an LRT station represent an inappropriate use of high-value land. rc-1 LRT 49 proposed section
R-C1 TOWN CENTER BO W TR A STATION AREA PRECINCT R-C1 IL SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 Calgary’s first large scale Transit Oriented Development. 45 ST R-C1 While some argue that the and Tim Hortons is, would allow intensification of Rosscarrock for more residential in closer and 37th Street may be proximity to Westbrook station. ! prolonging the life of the aging C-COR1 The block structure here allows Westbrook Mall, it is likely that for a strong MC-GC-COR2 transition to a large increase in land value Glendale. ! C-N1 ! connected to surrounding 17 AVE redevelopment will entice the As the highest potential TOD C-O ownership to either renew or site in Calgary, the Rosscarrock redevelop. DC transition zone will require 37 ST aggressive development R-C1friendly R-C1 The Uptown at Westbrook policy. porject by Matco Development R-C1s R-C2 envisions a 8-12 storey mixed C-COR1 R-C2 use village with limited parking and ample private public space. C-COR2 R-CG 26 AVE While the time-line for this may C-N1 M-CG be in the next 5 years, it is a M-C1 C-O critical development to respond R-C1 R-C2 N to. DC M-C2 R-C1 MU-1 50 0 0.125 0.25 KM 0.5 A mixed use node, where a current Shoppers Drug Mart R-C1s MU-2 R-C2 S-CS R-CG S-R M-CG S-SPR M-C1 S-CRI
TR A R-C1 IL R-C1 SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 BO W 01 TR 45 ST R-C1 AI R-C1 L R-C1 INTERVENTIONS 37 ST SARCEE TRAIL 1 R-C2 BO ! W TRA Section R-C1 IL ! ! SARCEE TRAIL R-C2 17 AVE R-C1 45 ST Town Center Transition 3 37 ST R-C1 R-C1 BO W 45 ST TRA R-C1 IL R-C1 The block structure of Rosscarrock allows for a smoother density R-C2 transition from the R-C2 Mall redevelopment. This area will be largely SARCEE TRAIL 1 4-6 storey multifamily residences relying on a mix of transportation 37 ST options. 26 AVE ! 2 ! 02 03 45 ST R-C1 R-C2 N ! R-C1 ! KM 17 AVE ! 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 ! 3 17 AVE 3 37 ST ! R-C1 2 ! ! R-C2 17 AVE 37 ST R-C1 26 AVE 3 37 ST Uptown at Westbrook (2) and Mixed Use Node (3) R-C1 N R-C2 R-C1 R-C2 Matco Developments visionR-C2 for Westbrook mall is a transit oriented 8-12 storey mixed use village. Our plan would extend this form, with 0 26 AVE 0.125 0.25 KM 0.5 lower heights, across the corner to the current strip mall site. 51 26 AVE R-C1 R-C2 N KM 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 N
POLICY: TOWN CENTER Parking Minimums STATION AREA 7. New stand-alone retail and commercial developments are prohibited along 37th Street and the Mixed Use Node. 8. In the Precinct Area, Parking must be provided on-site, and calculated in accordance with In this area policy is intended to prioritize medium density non 3. New automobile service the requirements of the Land automobile-oriented residential and commercial uses. centers, drive-through Use By-law. businesses and service 1. Land use re-designations 2. Land Use variance is Stations are not allowed within Permitted relaxations include: must be consistent with the permitted along 37 Street SW: the Town Center Precinct Area. zoning classifications identified a) from MC-1 or MC-2 to MU-1 a) a 75% relaxation to the on the Town Center Precinct b) from MC-1 to MC-2 if: 4. Stand-alone parking lots parking minimum specified by Zoning Map, unless variance is i) heights do not exceed and parking structures are the LUB if the parcel or parcels permitted. 5 storeys, including prohibited touch a 400m (as the crow bonusing. throughout the Town Center flys) radius drawn from an LRT Precinct Area, unless required Station Entrance. for an approved temporary use. b) a 50% relaxation to the 5. Temporary uses include any parking minimum specified by uses not requiring permanent the LUB if the parcel or parcels structures. There is no parking touch an 800m (as the crow minimum for temporary uses. flys) radius drawn from an LRT Station Entrance. 6. Office only development 10 Ave shall not be permitted within this area. All office shall include 52 37 St. pedestrian-friendly ground floor retail.
existing section existing section 39 st. 39 st. 38 st. 38 st. 37 st. 37 st. rc-g rc-g mc-1 mc-1 mc-1 mc-1 mc-2 mc-2 mC-2 mC-2 DC DC DC DC Currently 2.5 storey 6-plexes front onto 37th Street. They are rapidly aging, and with average rents lower than $1000 a month, present a low quality building to street interface. An increase in heights would achieve a more pedestrian friendly street wall and minimize the visual width of 37th Street. proposed section proposed section 30m 30m 18m 18m 14m 16m 16m 11m 11m 39 st. 39 st. 14m 38 st. 38 st. 37 st. 37 st. 53 rc-g rc-g mc-1 mc-1 mc-1 mc-1 mc-2 mc-2 mu-2 mu-2 DC DC DC DC
HOW SHOULD THE COMMUNITY MOVE? CONNECTIVITY Examining road, transit, cycling and pedestrian connectivity and mobility. MOBILITY & This section will align with the Transportation Sustainability Triangle from the Calgary Municipal Development Plan, and propose solutions to increase multi-modal, non-automobile modes of transportation. The Main Streets project is underway for 37th Street and 17th Avenue. As the project is underway but not yet completed, consideration will be given to the design proposals. Walking 07 Cycling Sustainability1 Degree of Public Transit Carpooling (HOV) Automobiles (SOV) 54
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS 1 2 3 4 Developed Areas Guidebook Calgary Transportation Plan Complete Streets Policy Cycling Strategy One of three guidebooks Works with the Municipal Provides design guidelines for Sets out strategies for increasing that are part of the Municipal Development Plan to guide multi-modal streets in Calgary to active transit in the form of Development Plan. Similar long-term planning for different increase non-vehicle travel.3 cycling in the City of Calgary.4 mobility policies found across methods of transportation, local area plans concerning spanning from automobiles, established communities are transit, cycling, and walking.2 55 consolidated in here.1
ROAD NETWORK Road Hierarchy Traffic Volume Speed Limits Bow Tr. Bow Tr. 45 St. 45 St. 37 St. 37 St. Spruce Dr. Spruce Dr. Sarcee Tr. Sarcee Tr. Bow Tr. Bow Tr. 17 Ave. 17 Ave. 17 Ave. 17 Ave. 33 St. 33 St. 51 St. 45 St. 37 St. 51 St. 45 St. 37 St. Design Capacity Road Type (vehicles/day) Current Capacity (%) Speed Limits Skeletal 35,000+ >100 80 km/h 75-100 60 km/h Arterial 20,000-35,000 50-75 50 km/h Neighborhood 12,500-22,500 30 km/h 56 Boulevard Collector 2,000-8,000
Stoney Trail and Bow Trail Analysis Old Banff Coach Rd. Sarcee Tr. Bow Trail Widening Future West Stoney Trail The road hierarchy features a Skeletal road in Sarcee Trail, which runs up the West side of the area. It effectively cuts off access to the West side of Westgate and Glendale. The higher orders roads are approaching, or are at design capacity. There is a high East- West volume along Bow Trail, likely due to commuters heading towards downtown. This volume will no doubt increase as the Shorcutting Entrances What We Heard construction of the West Ring Road portion of Stoney Trail, and the widening of Bow Trail nears completion56. This could lead to future “I will not allow widening of Bow Trail between Sarcee Trail and 37th Street. my kids to play in As traffic volume increases, residents of this the front yard as area, or people with destinations in the area, will seek quicker entry into the communities, cars zoom by.” leading to shortcutting. What We Heard The community confirmed this potential for shortcutting, noting that most shortcutting produced speeding, and occurred during rush hours towards schools, as parents drop off and pick-up their kids. Schools are seen as traffic magnets, with concerns of safety around school areas, and speeding down roads leading to schools. Specific roads pointed out include Warwick Dr., Gateway Dr., and Georgia St. 57
Intervention Areas TRAFFIC CALMING High Priority Goals Mid Priority BO WT Traffic calming goals include: RA Low Priority IL • Using traffic calming interventions to create 4 3 3 a safe environment for pedestrians 1 • Prioritize intersections around schools, and shortcutting entrances leading to schools 2 1 4 • Improve existing traffic calming interventions 1 1,2 SARCEE TRAIL Strategy Per the City of Calgary Traffic Calming 1 4 5 1,2 1 Policy, the following strategies recommended in this area fall into 1 2 these categories7: • Horizontal deflection (roundabout) • Narrow road right-of-way (curb extension, bike lanes) • Vertical deflection (speed bumps, 3 3 4 1 raised crosswalks) 2 37 STREET 1 5 • Signage (4-way stops) 1,2 1 Policy 1 1 • Traffic calming methods shall be 1 1 1 implemented according to the strategy and 5 1 location as indicated on the “Intervention 1 Areas” map. 1 4 1 1 • Traffic calming shall be implemented at locations indicated as “High Priority”. 26 AVE • Traffic calming should be implemented at 58 locations indicated as “Medium Priority” and “Low Priority”.
Curb Extension 4-Way Bike Lanes Stop 2 4 Curb extensions narrow the road right-of- Bike lanes way by taking up part of a parking lane, 4-Way narrow slowing vehicles. They increase the visibility Stops the right of pedestrians, and shortens the crossing require of way for distance. drivers to travel lanes, come to a slowing Temporary curb extensions can be achieved complete down through paint and flexi-posts, although stop before vehicles. permanent concrete curb extensions are proceed- recommended, and provide an opportunity for ing. bio-swales. Speed Round- 1 Bumps, 3 about 5 Raised Crosswalks Vehicles slow down Speed when bumps navigating and raised around crosswalks a round- slow vehi- about. The cles down overall flow by providing of vehicles an elevation is not im- in the road. peded. 59 Temporary Curb Extension, Bridgeland, Calgary Raised Crosswalk, Calgary Roundabout, Rosscarrock
TRANSIT NETWORK Transit Routes - Local Circulation Transit Routes - Greater Circulation 70 111 93 University Foothills of Calgary 70 Medical 111 Centre SAIT Downtown 9 70 9 Westbrook Mall 6, 9, 93 94, 111, 306 Manchester 2 Industrial 93 6, 9, Chinook 94, 306 Centre Mount Royal 94 University 6 Rockyview 9 General 306 Hospital km km 0 0.5 1 0 4 8 Bus Routes Rapid Transit 94: Stratchona/ 2: Mt. Pleasant/ 9: Dalhousie-Chinook 306: MAX Teal BRT Westbrook Killarney 17 Ave. 70: Valley Ridge Express Blue Line C-Train 60 93: Coach Hill/ Westbrook 111: Old Banff C-Train Stop 6: Killarney 26 Ave. Coach Road
Analysis service area was generated using the transit We see that servicing extends to most major schedules, both bus and train, on any given employment and post-secondary education Local transit servicing features a transit hub at Monday at 8:15 am. The starting points are the destinations due to the rapid transit network Westbrook Mall. The area is also serviced by geographic center of each community. This lines. However, servicing to the north is two rapid transit network lines in the C-Train method factors in walking from a residence to impacted by the river and lack of crossing and BRT Max Teal. Looking at transit routes a transit stop, and the ability to transfer transit points. is one thing, but we also have to look at the routes. effectiveness of these routes. The transit Transit Service Area Bus Stop Walkshed C-Train Station Walkshed University Foothills of Calgary Medical Centre SAIT Downtown Manchester Industrial Mount Royal University Chinook Centre Rockyview General Hospital km km km 0 4 8 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 1 Commute Time Walking Time Walkshed Coverage Walking Time Walkshed Coverage 5 Minutes 5 Minutes Westgate 68% Westgate Rosscarrock Glendale 10 Minutes Rosscarrock 85% 5 Minutes 9% 16% 13% 15 Minutes Glendale 87% 10 Minutes 38% 63% 49% 61 Total: 80% 15 Minutes 60% 92% 88%
Transit accessibility on a local scale can be measured by walkshed coverage to transit Proposed Routes - North Proposed Routes - Local stations. Rosscarrock and Glendale are well serviced by transit, while Westgate has the lowest coverage due to a recent removal of a transit route that serviced North Westgate. University What We Heard of Calgary Concerns around the decrease in accessibility to transit for residents in Westgate were raised. This has had the greatest impacted on Foothills Medical people with reduced mobility as the current Centre situation for seniors requires too much walking on their behalf. BETTER BUS SERVICE Goals Our transit goals are to: • Increase transit accessibility to residents. Existing Route Existing Route • Decrease the commute time to local amenities, major employment centers and Proposed Express Route Proposed Local Route post-secondary education institutions, 9 (Dalhousie-Chinook) making transit a viable alternate to driving. Bus Stop Walkshed with Proposed Route Policy Strategy • An express bus route should be • Introduce a new express route, or convert implemented according to the “Proposed the 9 (Dalhousie-Chinook) into an express Routes – North” map, either creating a new route to increase serviceability to the North. route, or following the 9 (Dalhousie-Chinook) • Introduce a local route to circulate route from the stretch between Westbrook the communities and Westbrook Mall, Mall and the University of Calgary. reintroducing bus service to Westgate. • A local bus route shall be implemented according to the “Proposed Routes – Local” 62 map. 5 Minute Walking Time
You can also read