Grocery Retailing Payments - Study 2013
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
REALIZE YOUR CASH OFFICE POTENTIAL Automates cash office procedures to reduce labor, shrink and bank fees vbInSight Optimizes self-checkout Enables bookkeepers to more Offers all-in processing for any Provides Web-based corporate balancing and monitors efficiently manage cash and check type to improve returns reporting to make monitoring terminals to reduce balancing non-cash items to reduce and reduce transportation cash office activities more frequency and cash on hand cash on hand and shrink and bank costs efficient ® www.balanceinnovations.com 11011 Eicher Drive | Lenexa, KS 66219 | 913.599.1177
National Grocers Association Balance Innovations, LLC Grocery Retailing Payments Study 2013 Published by: National Grocers Association Balance Innovations, LLC Prepared by: 210 Analytics, LLC NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 3
Copyright© 2013 National Grocers Association (NGA) and Balance Innovations, LLC All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced, stored in any information or retrieval system or transmitted in whole or in part, in any form or by any means — electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise — without the express written permission of NGA and Balance Innovations. For questions or comments, please contact: Aileen Munster Vice President of Education and Research, National Grocers Association at amunster@nationalgrocers.org Joy Nicholas Vice President of Business Development, Balance Innovations at jnicholas@balanceinnovations.com National Grocers Association is the national trade association representing the retail and wholesale grocers that comprise the independent sector of the food distribution industry. An independent retailer is a privately- owned or controlled food retail company operating a variety of formats. Most independent operators are serviced by wholesale distributors, while others may be partially or fully self-distributing. Some are publicly- traded but with the controlling shares held by the family and others are employee-owned. Independents are the true entrepreneurs of the grocery industry and dedicated to their customers, associates and communities. NGA members include retail and wholesale grocers, state grocer associations, manufacturers and service suppliers. Balance Innovations® is the leading developer of reconciliation and cash office management solutions for the retail industry. Our leading-edge, customizable solutions integrate seamlessly with existing POS technologies to simplify and improve retailers’ cash office management operations. Balance Innovations’ premier product, VeriBalance®, is a patented, easy-to-use software solution that is helping retailers across the United States and Canada increase profitability and improve operations by reducing labor, bank fees and shrink while standardizing and enforcing best practices and corporate policies. Other products include: vbEPIXTM, an electronic check processing solution; vbForecastTM, a cash forecasting product; vbScoutTM, a self-checkout management tool; and vbInSightTM, a corporate reporting solution. Customers range from independent grocers to Fortune 50 retailers. For more information, visit www.balanceinnovations.com. NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 4
Introduction The 2013 Grocery Retailing There is a lot of uncertainty about the technical future of payment Payments Study is designed processing. While consumers have the most say in the success or to understand the costs of and rejection of future payments innovations, retailers must also keep a industry practices relative to watchful eye on their costs – which in some cases exceed the net profit cash, check, debit and credit on a typical grocery purchase. While some cost components cannot be management, payments controlled by the retailer, other high-activity costs can be an indication automation and other of the need to improve processes and remove inefficiencies, such as payments related topics, such the more streamlined handling of cash and checks. as coupons and e-commerce. In response to frequent requests from grocery retailers for benchmarks and best practices relative to payments, the National Grocers Association (NGA) teamed up with Balance Innovations to provide the industry with this much needed information. Understanding the latest trends helps retailers optimize their own internal payment mechanisms to reduce shrink and inefficiencies, meet the next generation payment processing needs, and establish solid payment policies and strategies for the company and individual stores. The payment process is very much part of the shopping experience and trip satisfaction, and retailers need to be prepared for wherever the market may move to meet shopper preferences and future payment innovations. Many of the findings are significantly impacted by company size, measured by the number of stores operated. Therefore, the report reflects the median for a more accurate picture of nationwide payment practices as it is less skewed by large outliers in the data. However, beyond the national averages, the report provides more detailed insights by company size, sales volume, transaction volume and average transaction size, as appropriate. This detailed information can be used to benchmark against industry peers. NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 5
Table of Contents Report Highlights....................................................................................................................................................7 Front-End Technology..............................................................................................................................................9 Checkouts.........................................................................................................................................................9 Self-Checkout....................................................................................................................................................9 Sales, Transactions and Transaction Size......................................................................................................11 Front-End Technology Choices.........................................................................................................................12 Store Accounting Data and the General Ledger.............................................................................................12 Coupon Handling..............................................................................................................................................13 Payment Types........................................................................................................................................................14 Payment Types as a Percentage of Transactions Versus Dollar Sales..........................................................14 Average Transaction Amount by Payment Type..............................................................................................16 E-Commerce......................................................................................................................................................17 Cash Operations......................................................................................................................................................18 Drawer/Till Practices........................................................................................................................................18 Cash Management at the Store Level.............................................................................................................20 Safe Management............................................................................................................................................20 Armored Car Service........................................................................................................................................21 Reconciliation ..................................................................................................................................................21 Cash Operations...............................................................................................................................................22 Over-Short Report.............................................................................................................................................23 Store Cash Audits.............................................................................................................................................23 Checks.....................................................................................................................................................................25 Check Volume...................................................................................................................................................25 Check Imaging and Encoding..........................................................................................................................25 Check Clearance...............................................................................................................................................26 Conclusions.............................................................................................................................................................27 Methodology ...........................................................................................................................................................28 NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 6
Report Highlights Front-End Technology Payment Types • Grocery retailers operate an average of 10 • While credit and debit make up more than 60 checkout lanes, with the majority being percent of dollar sales, cash continues to make regular cashier-assisted lanes. The majority, up the highest percentage of total transactions, 66 percent, do have self-checkout lanes, with at 38.2 percent. Cash makes up a much smaller a higher prevalence among higher-volume 23.1 percent of dollar sales as shoppers tend stores. If offered, stores average four self- to pay cash for smaller transactions. Continued checkout lanes. declining use of checks in the grocery channel Self-checkout lanes are typically counted prompted checks to fall to the single digits as a percentage of sales and transactions. and replenished once daily and 82 percent do cash pickups every day as well. Nine in 10 Checks do have the highest average companies have no plans to add or remove transaction size, at $63.21, followed by self-checkout lanes. credit and debit transactions. • A point-of-sale at the service desk, check • Processor files are the most commonly used cashing and Western Union are offered by at resources for EPS reconciliation, at 54 percent. least half of grocery retailers. Less common • Monthly fees (combination of processing, are in-lane mobile payments and check network and bank fees) for debit average 1.3 imaging as well as smart safes. One-third, percent and 1.9 percent of sales for credit. however, are considering adding smart safes to their stores. One-quarter are considering Cash the implementation of in-lane electronic check • Opening drawer amounts average $274, with a conversion. median of $200. • One-third of companies offer some type of 54 percent of companies have cashiers count online ordering and another 8 percent expect their drawers before and after they sign on/ to enter the world of e-commerce in the next two years. Most online ordering sites are hosted off. Furthermore, 94 percent have a second by a third-party and offer a range of payments, person counting the till in addition to the with Discover, VISA and MasterCard being the cashier. Twenty-nine percent do not have most common ones, and PayPal and PIN debit their cashiers count the drawers at all. being the least commonly offered options. Sales and Transactions • While retailers spend a fair amount of hours counting tills, only 52 percent of companies • Weekly transactions per store average 11,000, track the time taken to count the cash. The with a transaction size of $27.65. On a per- average per drawer is seven minutes, with a checkout basis, weekly sales average $29,194 median of six. and transactions stand at 1,241. • Food retailers average 17 drawer pickups and • 56 percent have an automated way of sending loans per store, per day. store accounting data to the general ledger. • In a typical week, grocery companies process Coupons an average of four change orders per store. • 63 percent reconcile coupons at the store, • The average daily cash deposit amount is highly with a manual count (60 percent) or adding related to sales and transactions and averages individual coupon amounts (20 percent) being $8,946. the two most common ways. • The most common way for stores to order cash • On a per-store basis, annual coupon losses is through the in-store cash office (60 percent). average $1,239. NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 7
• 84 percent of stores offer cash back with Checks purchase. The 16 percent that don’t are small • Checks are decreasing as a form of payment independent operators. in the grocery channel. Companies handle the Safe Management greatest number of personal checks, followed • Company practices relative to counting the by WIC and payroll checks. The latter are safe and maximum safe amounts allowed vary accepted by 78 percent of companies. widely: 29 percent only count the safe in the • 67 percent of grocery retailers do not yet image morning when the store opens, whereas others checks. Among those that do, check imaging in count the safe multiple times, whether at the cash office is more common than in-lane. opening and closing, three times a day or after 48 percent of grocers handle check collection every shift. in-house. They average 1-2 returned checks 74 percent of companies have a set maximum per store, per week, but have a 70 percent allowable safe amount. Among those that do, collection rate on bad checks. The average the average amount is $27,021. returned check fee is $22. • 46 percent of grocery retailers use armored car service between five and six days a week. Reconciliation • It takes an average of four bookkeeper hours to conduct a daily close, reconciliation and deposit. • Point-of-sale transactions that are not integrated are most often manually entered into the store’s POS system (52 percent) or entered into a program that feeds the general ledger (33 percent). Preventing shrink • Six in 10 companies have automated over- short reports that they share with a number of departments throughout the company to limit and prevent shrink: 80 percent share the over-short reports with store operations; 53 percent with loss prevention and 47 percent with internal audit. While 12 percent never do store cash audits, most companies do them either weekly (20 percent) or quarterly (28 percent). The chosen methods vary with 38 percent doing surprise store cash audits and 33 percent doing both surprise and planned ones. Companies spend three hours to conduct an audit. NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 8
Front-End Technology The front-end is an enormously important part of the store. For one, it’s the only area that every customer passes. Secondly, expedient and friendly service at the front-end goes a long way in ensuring a positive trip experience. At the same time, optimizing the front- end requires being cognizant of consumer privacy, data Average of 10 security, theft-related shrink and more, while maximizing Checkout Lanes operational efficiency. This chapter covers benchmarks on current practices and future plans for various front- 1 end technologies. 1 Self-Checkout 8 Regular Express Checkouts U.S. grocery retailers offer an average of 10 checkout lanes, but predictably this figure varies highly by store size and sales. For example, stores with weekly sales per store greater than $400,000 report an average of 13 checkouts, whereas smaller stores with weekly sales of less than $100,000 have an average of four. Grocery retailers balance various technologies at the front end to find the best combination of cashier-assisted, self- checkout and express/fast lanes — and some have started experimenting with mobile checkout using the customers’ own smartphones or hand-held scanners. Checkout Lanes Express Lanes Self-Checkout Lanes The number of lanes in full- • 36% of stores do not have • 66% of stores have at least express lanes at all one self-checkout lane service supermarkets ranges • Express lanes are more • Self-checkout lanes are from three to 22 prevalent among higher- much more prevalent Survey respondents use a wide volume stores among higher-volume stores variety of POS types: • If offered, stores average 2 • If offered, stores average 4 • 24% IBM lanes lanes • 24% Retalix • Often times, stores that • 20% NCR offer self-checkout also have express lanes • Others include ACR, ECR, RORC, ACE, RDS and TSS Self-Checkout Retailers often use self-checkout out as a way to adjust to the highs and lows in customer traffic throughout the day. With only one employee for four to six self-checkout lanes, it can also generate significant cost savings. But beyond the numbers and cost, the industry passionately debates the human factor in the self-checkout versus staffed-lanes discussion. A personable and helpful cashier can add great value and highly appreciated customer service, providing an important and lasting impression on the customer. As such, cashier-assisted lanes can be a genuine asset, not just another cost. This point is driven home by The Retail Feedback Group’s U.S. Supermarket Experience survey that found that the average trip satisfaction among shoppers who used self-checkout lanes is much lower than that of shoppers who used cashier-assisted lanes. While some NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 9
shoppers are appreciative of technological advances such as self and mobile checkout, it appears the human factor does add an important touch. Counting Companies with at least one self-checkout Impact of checkout lane on trip satisfaction typically count the self-checkout registers either Average satisfaction on a scale 1-5, where 5 is the highest... daily (50 percent) or just once a week. Practices Average 4.42 differ by company, sales and transactions, with Used self-checkout 4.29 larger companies slightly more likely to count Used cashier-assisted lanes 4.44 only once a week. Graph courtesy of: The Retail Feeback Group from U.S. Supermarket Experience 2012 Replenishing Sixty-four percent of companies with at least one Frequency of counting the self-checkout lanes self-checkout lane replenish these lanes daily, others do so every two to three days. Pickups Once a Daily While the self-checkout lanes may not be week 50% replenished every day, the vast majority of 42% companies with at least once self-checkout lanes do cash pickups on a daily basis. The remaining 9% 18 percent do so every two to three days Multiple days per week Future Changes to Self-Checkout Frequency of replenishing the self-checkout lanes While some supermarket chains have removed Every 4+ days 0% self-checkout lanes in recent years citing limited customer use and the preference of cashier Every contact with customers, the majority of survey Daily 2-3 Days respondents (90 percent) do not plan to make 64% 36% any changes to the existing self-checkout set-up at their stores in the next two years. More than once a day 0% In fact, while 90 percent expect to hold the status quo on self-checkout, the remaining 10 percent Frequency of self-checkout lane pickups actually anticipate increasing the number of More than once a day 0% lanes over the next two years. Every 2-3 Days 18% Every 4+ days 0% Daily 82% NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 10
Sales, Transactions and Transaction Size Survey respondents average slightly more than $300,000 in sales per store, per week. This reflects the full mix of one-store operators and regional chains. Weekly transactions per store are stable at slightly more than 11,000 and the average transaction size is $27.65. This is the average amount spent per customer, regardless of payment type. Weekly sales and transactions are important drivers behind front-end technology decisions, including the availability of express and self-checkout lanes and payment processing related technology. Sales and transactions by checkout: • Weekly store sales by checkout: $29,194 • Weekly transactions by checkout: 1,241 Weekly Sales Per Store Weekly Transaction Per Store Average Transaction Size Average: $305,105 Average: 11,211 Average: $27.65 Ranges from $30,600 to $1,641,000 Ranges from 2,147 to 29,477 Ranges from $14 to $58 High-volume Low-volume High-volume Low-volume All Companies store; sales store; sales store; >10,000 store; $250,000
Front-End Technology Choices The use of front-end technologies varies widely among food retailing companies, with higher-volume stores (in terms of sales and transactions) more likely to have a range of services. Some of the more common technologies, implemented by at least half of retailers, are a point-of-sale at the service desk, check cashing and Western Union. Less common are the use of smart safes and check imaging in lane/at the point-of- purchase. One-third, however, are considering having smart safes in their stores. One-quarter are considering the implementation of in-lane electronic check conversion. Neither have, nor considering All All All High-volume Low-volume companies; Currently have companies; companies; store; store; Neither Currently Are Currently Currently have, nor have considering have have considering POS at service desk 76% 4% 20% 88% 71% Check cashing 63% 4% 33% 69% 55% Western Union 56% 4% 40% 46% 64% Bill payments 48% 8% 44% 36% 43% Self-checkout POS 44% 4% 52% 64% 29% Coin dispensers 24% 4% 72% 46% 7% Electronic check conversion in 24% 24% 52% 18% 29% lane (return check to customer) Check imaging in the back office 16% 16% 68% 18% 14% Mobile payments in lane 8% 32% 60% 14% 0% Smart safes 8% 34% 58% 18% 0% Check imaging in lane 4% 16% 80% 9% 0% Store Accounting Data and the General Ledger Slightly more than half of companies (56 percent) have an automated way of sending store accounting data to their general ledger. Additionally, 12 percent are considering such a system. NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 12
Coupon Handling Digital coupons According to Inmar, coupon redemption for consumer packaged goods (CPGs) increased 6.1 percent in 2012, to about 3.5 billion coupons NGA along with several redeemed, despite a decline in distribution. The increase in redemption other trade groups released continues a trend that began during the recession, after grocery free guidelines designed to couponing had been declining for several years. Freestanding inserts promote model practices in (FSIs) continued to be the most popular way to distribute coupons, digital couponing and reduce accounting for 88 percent. The redemption rate for FSI was 0.5 percent the incidence of coupon fraud. and the rate for Internet print-at-home coupons increased to 7.7 Produced by the Joint Industry percent. Internet print-at-home coupons accounted for 4.6 percent of Coupon Committee (JICC), total coupon redemption volume, having grown by 73.5 percent over “Voluntary Guidelines for 2011 to 161 million coupons. Digital Coupons” shares Reconciling Coupons at the Store model digital coupon practices in order to promote Slightly less than two-thirds of responding companies (63 percent) a positive experience for reconcile coupons at the store. The majority does so by doing a manual consumers, proper settlement count, at 60 percent. The second most common way is to add individual for retailers and effective and coupon amounts, cited by 20 percent of companies. well-controlled promotions for Annual Coupon Losses manufacturers. Annual coupon losses vary from none to substantial amounts, with The guidelines highlight the an average of $1,239 on a per-store basis. Many of the smaller key distinctions between independents do not track this cost, whereas the amount tends to be digital and paper coupons, more substantial among larger chains, on a per store basis. including the presence of Monthly Coupon Processing Fees barcode data, distribution methods, consumer Monthly coupon processing fees average $46 with a median of $41. acquisition and presentment, purchase validation and offer set-up at point of sale. 60% Manually count The guidelines are available at: http://bit.ly/X4TUQb 7% 63% Reconcile Scanning coupons at 20% the store Adding ind. coupon amounts 13% Other NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 13
Payment Types Keeping up with changes in payment processing technology and the potential acceptance or rejection of various payment innovations by consumers is a major source of concern among food retailers as they wonder where to invest. This chapter provides a range of payment-related benchmarks to help retailers understand the tremendous shifts in consumer behavior as it relates to preferred payment options. Payment Types as a Percentage of Transactions Versus Dollar Sales The major payment types have been relatively unchanged for many In 2009 (the most recent years, with the last big addition being direct debit that was introduced in data available), noncash the 1960s. However, the usage of each of the payment types has seen transactions totaled 109 tremendous change. Debit transactions saw a drastic increase, mostly million, with a value of $72.2 at the expense of checks, despite the fact that the U.S. continues to trillion. Noncash payments lag the rest of the world in moving away from checks. Several European increased by 4.6 percent between 2006 and 2009. countries have announced the complete phasing out of checks within Electronic payments (made the next few years. with cards and by ACH) now The decline of check usage and the rise of debit can be seen in the collectively exceed three- grocery retailing industry as well. Debit has nearly caught up with credit quarters of all noncash in both sales and transactions and checks are down to single-digit payments while payments by percentages. check have dropped to less than one-quarter. As a As a percentage of percentage of The Federal Reserve attributes dollar sales transactions the rise of electronic payments Credit 31.5% 25.2% to technological and financial Debit 29.4% 23.2% innovations that influence Cash 23.1% 38.2% Check 8.4% 5.5% the payment instrument EBT 5.1% 5.6% choices of consumers and Other 1.6% 0.9% business. Other reasons WIC 0.4% 1.0% mentioned include the eWIC 0.3% 0.2% level of economic activity, Proprietary charge regulatory developments and 0.3% 0.2% cards demographic changes in the population. The mix of payments used differs widely by store sales, transactions, and above all, the average transaction size. Cash and EBT rise in Source: Federal Reserve importance for smaller transactions of $20 or less. Cash increases Payments Study 2010 as the chosen payment from 23.1 percent across all respondents to 34.6 percent among companies with smaller-than-average transaction sizes. On the contrary, among stores with much higher-than-average NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 14
transaction sizes of $35 or more, cash becomes less important as a percentage of the total and 42.1 percent of total dollar sales are generated through credit payments. High sales Low sales Average Average All As a percentage of dollar sales volume volume transaction transaction companies stores stores ≤$20 ≥$35 Credit 31.5% 37.1% 26.9% 22.2% 42.1% Debit 29.4% 28.5% 30.1% 26.4% 29.1% Cash 23.1% 20.7% 25.1% 34.6% 16.7% Check 8.4% 5.6% 10.9% 6.7% 4.6% EBT 5.1% 4.4% 5.8% 8.6% 2.1% Other 1.6% 2.4% 1.1% 0.5% 3.9% WIC 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% 1.0% 0.4% eWIC 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.6% Proprietary charge cards 0.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% Branded decoupled debit 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Debit and Credit Credit and debit card interchange fees are expensive to retailers, despite the financial reform legislation (the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act P.L. 111-203) and the decision by the Federal Reserve to cap transaction fees. In addition to transaction fees, retailers are charged other fees including processing costs, dues and assessments in order to accept credit and debit cards. Our survey found the following averages for monthly fees as a percentage of sales. Debit Credit Processing fees 0.5% 0.9% Network fees 0.6% 0.8% Bank fees 0.2% 0.2% Total 1.3% 1.9% NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 15
Chargebacks (the return of funds to a customer) appear to be a non-issue in the grocery retailing industry. Most respondents said they have fewer than one chargeback per store, per week or simply wrote “negligible.” Given the low number of chargebacks, the dollar amount was a non-issue as well. EPS Reconciliation Resources Resources used for EPS reconciliation Processor files are the most commonly Percentage of companies used resources for EPS reconciliation, followed by bank files and POS Processor files 54% transaction files. Bank files 25% POS transaction files 21% Incentives to Use Cash Despite the cost of debit and credit, no retailers in our study are offering either discounts or promotions for free/discounted products if customers pay with cash. Average Transaction Amount by Payment Type With an average transaction size of $27.65, amounts vary widely by payment type as shown below: CASH CHECK DEBIT CREDIT EBT WIC $16.55 $63.21 $34.17 $37.15 $25.82 $22.31 Additionally, the number of weekly transactions and the amount of weekly sales also significantly impact the transaction amount by payment type. In high-volume stores, transaction sizes are higher for all payment types with the exception of cash. High-volume store; Sales Low sales volume stores Average transaction size All companies >$250,000 sales
E-Commerce One-third of grocery companies currently offer some type of online E-commerce presence among grocery retailers ordering and over the next two years, another 8 percent expect to enter the world of e-commerce. The remaining 59 percent do not 33% currently have plans to take their grocery business online. Online ordering E-commerce can take a number of different forms. First, there 59% established No planned are some online-only grocers, such as MyWebGrocer and online 8% ordering Planning online Netgrocer, with a growing presence of online-only retailers in ordering in next two years niche food segments, such as gluten-free or organic. Next, there are regional and national brick-and-mortar grocery chains, such Forrester Research predicts that as Giant, Publix, Hy-Vee and D’Agostino, offering online ordering U.S. consumers will spend $327 in addition to their physical store presence. Lastly, we have billion online in 2016 — accounting nationwide mass merchants (online and brick-and-mortar), such for 9 percent of total retail sales. as Amazon and Walmart. Additionally, chains can opt for online Computers, apparel, housewares and ordering with or without home-delivery options. books/music/videos are the largest Survey respondents with online ordering in place report that only categories. Groceries comprise the a fraction of their total company sales is generated through their fifth largest category. website, at an average of 0.8 percent of total sales. Online sales of groceries account for The vast majority (88 percent) use third-party services to host less than 3 percent of total grocery their online ordering site. industry revenue, which is estimated at $680 billion. However, online Accepted Online Payment Methods food sales are poised for growth While all responding companies with online ordering accept VISA, with consumer adoption of online MasterCard and Discover, the acceptance of other methods of purchasing growing annually and it payment varies widely: is likely that these purchases will soon start to affect trip frequency Accepted for online and format shifting in the brick- Payment method grocery orders and-mortar landscape. Forrester is Discover 100% predicting double-digit growth at VISA 100% 12.8 percent, taking online sales of MasterCard 100% grocery-type items from $11.7 billion Credit 89% in 2011 to $13.2 billion in 2012. American Express 89% Gift cards 67% Signature debit 33% Prepaid credit 33% PayPal 22% PIN debit 11% NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 17
Cash Operations As the number three form of payment following credit and debit, cash continues to be important in the grocery retailing industry. This is particularly true among stores catering to quick trips, smaller baskets and convenience-type purchases. Running efficient cash operations can save significantly in reducing shrink, improving accuracy, reducing labor costs and improving productivity. This chapter focuses on a variety of benchmarks relative to cash operations to help retailers compare their practices against that of industry peers. Drawer/Till Practices With an average of 10 checkout lanes per store, streamlined drawer or till practices go a long way in front-end efficiency. Opening Amount Ranging from $75 to $900, the average opening drawer amount is $274 with a median of $200. This average amount varies by store sales and transactions. As seen earlier, smaller stores in terms of sales and transactions tend to handle more cash transactions. As a result, they typically start off with slightly greater amounts. Average Average Opening High sales Low sales All companies transaction transaction drawer $ volume stores volume stores ≤$20 ≥$35 Average $274 $244 $305 $244 $275 Median $200 $200 $225 $200 $275 The Role of the Cashier Practices surrounding the role of the cashier in counting the drawers before they open or after they sign off for their shifts vary widely. While a narrow majority of retailers (54 percent) have cashiers count drawers both before they start and after they sign off, other systems range from no cashier involvement at all (29 percent) to checking just before or after. Do Cashiers.... Among the 71 percent of stores where cashiers have some level Count their drawers both 8% before they open and after of involvement in counting tills, they sign off. 9% the vast majority has another Cashiers never count layer of checks and balances their drawers. built into the process. In 94 29% 54% Count their drawers before percent of the cases, someone they open. else in addition to the cashiers counts the drawers as well. Count their drawers after they sign off for their shift. NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 18
This is often done by: 7 min • Bookkeeper (18 percent) Average • Front-end manager/supervisor (18 percent) 48% • Office administrator/clerk (12 percent) YES Track/benchmark • Accounts receivable (6 percent) the number of 6 min • Cash office manager (6 percent) minutes it takes Median to count the drawer 52% NO Time Spent Counting Drawers Retailers spend a fair amount of hours counting tills — especially with the vast majority of stores having both the cashier and another person involved in the process. Yet, only 52 percent of companies say they track the average number of minutes to count the cash. This share does not differ significantly across store sizes. Among those that do track or benchmark the time, the average number of minutes allocated to counting the cash is seven, with a median of six. Pickups and Loans On average, food retailing companies do 17 drawer pickups and loans per store, per day. As sales and transactions tend to have a direct correlation to the number of checkouts in the store, the average number of pickups and loans is highly related to store volume. High sales Low sales Pickups and All volume volume Loans companies stores stores Average 17 22 8 Median 18 23 7 NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 19
Cash Management at the Store Level In a typical week, grocery chains process an average of four change orders per store, with a median of three. This number was the same across high-volume and low-volume stores in terms of weekly sales. The average daily cash deposit amount, however, is highly related to sales and transactions. While on average grocery stores deposit just under $9,000 every day, high-volume stores (with weekly sales above $400,000) average $12,360 per day. Change Daily Orders Cash Deposit Average: 4 per store, per week Average: $8,946.00 Median: 3 Median: $7,850.00 High-volume stores: 4 High-volume stores: $12,360.00 Low-volume stores: 4 Low-volume stores: $5,934.00 Safe Management Company practices relative to counting the safe and Frequency of counting the safe maximum safe amounts allowed vary widely. While the highest share (29 percent of stores) only counts the safe in the morning when the store opens, others 29% count the safe multiple times, whether at opening 21% Morning and closing, three times a day or after every shift. After every shift 4% Often established by headquarters, these policies Night appear to differ more across company size and store 21% 25% Three times Morning and hours, than store volume. Specifically, companies a day night with 50 or more stores are more likely to do multiple counts than one- or two-store operators. Maximum Safe Amount Allowed $27,021 Respondents are also quite divided in their practices Average on the maximum allowable safe amount. Twelve percent of respondents do not have set maximums $15,000 Median at all and 14 percent of companies say the maximum 74% Have set amounts differ by store based on their individual maximums $38,395 Avg high volume sales volume. Among respondents that do have a Maximum safe amount allowed 12% maximum safe amount policy in place, the average Don’t have a $21,335 per store amount is $27,021, with a much lower median of policy at all Avg low volume $15,000. This difference between the average and 14% median reflects the enormous disparity in practices Differs by store and maximum amounts allowed among retailers. NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 20
Armored Car Service More than half of companies do not use armored car service pickup at all. Those that do, typically have pickups scheduled between five and six days a week at an average cost of $23 per pickup. 5 days/wk Average Fee per pickup: 46% • Average: $23 YES • Median: $20 Armored car 6 days/wk service? Median 54% Reconciliation NO Across food retailing companies, it takes an average of four bookkeeper hours to do a daily close, reconciliation and deposit. The cited number of hours is slightly higher at companies operating fewer than 10 stores and lower among regional chains. A possible explanation is the greater level of automation and technology integration among these larger companies. All responding companies do daily reconciliations. Reconciliation of Non-Integrated POS Reconciliation of non-integrated POS transactions Transactions Manual entry into Point-of-sale transactions that are not integrated, the store POS 14% such as Western Union, tent sales or bill pay, are Entered into program that feeds general most often manually entered into the store’s point- ledger 52% of-sale system (52 percent). The second most Spreadsheets 33% common way to reconcile non-integrated POS transactions is by entering them into a program that feeds the general ledger. NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 21
Cash Operations The most common way for stores to order cash is through personnel assigned to the in-store cash office. This is the practice among 60 percent of companies. Another 20 percent have standing cash and change orders. Practices surrounding ordering cash do differ significantly across respondents. Independent operators with fewer than 10 stores are more likely to have standing cash orders (30 percent), whereas 87 percent of the larger regional chains order cash through in-store cash office personnel. Companies with Companies with Ordering cash All companies < 10 stores > 50 stores Store cash office personnel 60% 50% 87% Standing cash/change order 20% 30% 13% Treasury or accounting personnel at HQ 12% 10% 0% Other 8% 10% 0% Offering Cash Back Offering customers the ability to get cash back with purchases has grown to become a very common practice among food retailers. Fully 84 percent of grocers offer cash back with purchases. Those that don’t, tend to be independent grocers operating fewer than 10 stores. All regional chains, operating more than 50 stores, offer cash back with purchase. Reporting Stores’ Cash on Hand Practices surrounding the reporting of cash on hand vary much more widely. While 44 percent of companies use manual reports received from the store, 40 percent use the reports generated by the POS system. Examples of ways companies report cash on hand mentioned under “other” include: • Proprietary system for back office • By using VeriBalance • Combination of bank deposits and manual reports received from the store Companies with Companies with Ordering cash All companies < 10 stores > 50 stores Manual reports received from the store 44% 60% 12% Reporting from the POS 40% 40% 75% Bank deposits 4% 0% 13% Other method 12% 0% 0% NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 22
Do you have Over-Short Report automated over-short 60% Across company sizes, 60 percent of responding food retailing reports? YES companies have automated over-short reports. This goes up to fully If yes, 53% 100 percent among companies with more than 50 stores. An over/ to whom Loss Prevention short reading indicates the difference between the amount of cash are they that was reported to the software during the end-of-day or drawer- distributed? 13% Safe audit closing process and the amount the software thinks you should have based on sales. A positive amount points at having more cash than you 33% should and a negative amount means having less. Sr. Management Most companies distribute these over-short reports to at least one 47% department, but often two or three. These most commonly are store Internal audit operations, loss prevention and internal audit. 80% Annual cashier over/shorts losses: Store operations • Average annual loss per store: $632 • The average loss among high-volume stores (weekly sales of $400,000 or more): $900 Store Cash Audits Practices regarding store cash audits vary widely. While 12 percent of companies (mostly small independent operators) never conduct store cash audits, 20 percent do them weekly, 28 percent quarterly and 16 percent as needed. Larger companies reported a higher frequency of audits. Frequency of store cash audits All companies Nature of store cash audits Daily 8% Weekly 20% Quarterly 28% Twice a year 4% 33% 38% Annually 12% Both Surprise As needed 16% Never 12% 29% Scheduled NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 23
Scheduled Versus Surprise Among companies that do store cash audits with at least some regularity, 38 percent do surprise audits, whereas 33 percent opt for a combination of surprise and scheduled. Hours per Audit Companies spend an average of 2.9 hours per audit, with a median of three. High sales Low sales All Store cash audits volume volume companies stores stores Scheduled 29% 33% 25% Surprise 38% 35% 42% Both 33% 32% 33% Average hours per audit 2.8 2.7 3.0 Median hours per audit 3 2.0 3.5 NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 24
Checks Checks are decreasing as a form of payment across all channels, including grocery. However, they remain an important payment source, accounting for just below 10 percent of dollar sales. Additionally, checks are an opportunity for food retailers to create traffic by offering services such as cashing payroll checks and travelers’ checks. Check processing practices in the U.S. are changing rapidly, with the percentage of checks cleared electronically having more than doubled in the past three years — reducing risk and improving response time and accuracy. Check Volume According to the Check Imaging and the Check Conversion Process Study, consumers write 37 billion checks each year, of which 13 billion are written by consumers at the point-of-sale to pay for purchases at retail locations. While the number of checks per store can vary highly on factors such as weekly transactions, region, local economy, local industry and neighborhood household income, the majority of grocery stores processes upwards of 750 personal checks per store, per month. The number of WIC checks per store, per month averages 258. According to the USDA, WIC participation has risen across states in recent years as a result of the economic conditions. Participation rates by state can be found at http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/26wifypart. htm. As to payroll checks, 22 percent of companies do not accept those at all. Those that do, handle an average of 94 payroll checks per store, per month. This translates into an average of 72 percent of checks being ACH and 28 percent being WIC, payroll and other checks. Personal checks WIC checks Payroll checks Average number per store, per month 950 258 94 Median number per store, per month 780 213 97 Average check amount $75.00 $23.00 $257 Median check amount $69.00 $21.00 $215.00 Check Imaging and Encoding Check Imaging Encode and Among grocery retailers, 67 percent Manually Deposit do not yet image checks. Twenty percent image the checks in the cash 20% 39% We image the checks We encode and office and 13 percent do so in lane. in the cash office. manually deposit checks. 13% We image the checks 61% in lane. We don’t encode and manually deposit checks. 67% We don’t image checks. NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 25
Check Collection Services Across company sizes, 48 percent of companies handle check collection in-house versus outsourcing this task. Larger companies, in terms of the number of stores operated, are more likely to handle check collection in house, at 57 percent. Companies with Companies with Check collection… All respondents 50 stores …is done in house 48% 44% 57% … is outsourced 52% 56% 43% Check Clearance Ranging from one to five days, checks take an average of three days to clear across companies and systems. When regarding the average wait among companies that have either in-lane or back-office imaging, the average for personal checks drops to two days. Among companies with back-office imaging, the average for WIC and Travelers checks drops to two days (those cannot be processed in-lane). Average wait for checks to be Companies with Returned check stats among All respondents settled with the bank check imaging all respondents Personal checks 3 days 2 days • Number of check returns WIC checks 3 days 2 days processed per store, per Payroll checks 3 days 3 days week: 1-2 Travelers checks 3 days 2 days • Annual bad check write- off per company: $2,683 Returned Checks (average) and $951 (median) • Collection percentage on bad On a per store, per week basis, most companies say the number checks: 70% of returned checks is minimal at an average of one to two a week. • Average retuned check fee Stores with higher check volumes (greater than 780 a week) typically (per check): $22 reported processing an average of three returned checks. The average per check fee on returned checks is $22, with a median of $25. This amount is consistent across company sizes and regions. Most companies are fairly successful in collecting on bad checks, with an average and median success rate of 70 percent. Regardless, most companies still have to write off an average of $2,683 per store in bad (uncollectable) checks, with a median of $951. The amount varies widely by company and number of checks received. NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 26
Conclusions • Customer preference has driven the increased usage of credit and debit. Electronic payments now make up more than sixty percent of total sales, with a declining use of cash and checks. Food retailers and their trade associations have spent much time and effort on reducing the cost of processing electronic payments, and rightfully so. However, it is important to consider potential savings across payment options for optimized payment processing. • Grocery retailers are faced with quite a few cost components when handling payments, whether cash, checks or plastic. The benchmarks in this report will help identify and quantify areas for more streamlined operations and cost cutting when processing payments. • Participating retailers often found it difficult to find all the data covered in this study. Either they did not track the data or could not disaggregate it to the level of detail required. Gathering accurate data is the first step in identifying and improving inefficient processes. • In general, larger stores (and often larger companies) have higher transaction volumes for all payment types and therefore are more cost efficient than smaller retailers. As a consequence, regional chains spend a lower percentage of total revenue on payment processing than independent operators. NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 27
Methodology The data included in this report was compiled from a three-page questionnaire that was sent to the NGA membership and additional grocery retailing and wholesaling companies between January and March, 2013. Data entry, data cleaning, statistical validity testing, analysis and reporting were done by Anne-Marie Roerink of 210 Analytics, LLC. Data outliers were checked and, if needed, removed from the sample. Likewise, data for company sizes, sales, transactions, etc. were checked for accurate representation. Due to rounding, percentages may not add to 100.00%. For any data analysis or methodology questions, please contact Anne-Marie at aroerink@210analytics.com. The study is based on 26 grocery retailing companies, representing more than 2,600 stores. These include: • One-store operators: 20 percent • 2-10 store operators: 20 percent • 11-30 store operators: 24 percent • 30-125 store operators: 20 percent • More than 126 stores: 16 percent NGA and Balance Innovations © Page | 28
You can also read