Geospatial data analysis and data linkage work at the AIHW - Evolving approaches to answer more complex questions

 
CONTINUE READING
Geospatial data analysis and data linkage work at the AIHW - Evolving approaches to answer more complex questions
Geospatial data analysis and data
linkage work at the AIHW
Evolving approaches to answer more complex
questions
Geospatial data analysis and data linkage work at the AIHW - Evolving approaches to answer more complex questions
Who are we?
• Major national information and statistics agency with a
  specialist focus on Australia’s health and welfare

• Independent statutory agency established under the AIHW
  Act (1987)

• Strong collaborations with governments, government
  agencies such as the ABS and PC, and NGOs

• Annual budget of around $45m with staff around 400
Geospatial data analysis and data linkage work at the AIHW - Evolving approaches to answer more complex questions
What do we do?
• Custodian of major national health and welfare collections
• Provide information and analysis across health, housing and
  community services sectors in around 150 reports a year
• Increasing contribution to performance reporting related to
  government services in the health and welfare sectors
• Manage the MyHospitals website
• Taking on an expanding national role in relation to data
  linkage
Geospatial data analysis and data linkage work at the AIHW - Evolving approaches to answer more complex questions
Current state – geospatial work
•   Emerging interest and pockets of capability
•   Growing recognition of power and importance of
    geospatially based analysis
•   Project based approach to geospatial analysis
•   Most reports contain basic geographic analysis (ARIA, SEIFA)
•   Focus is on implementation of ASGS into collection design
    and reporting, but…
    •   Very low dedicated resource for staff or necessary infrastructure

                                                                            4
Geospatial data analysis and data linkage work at the AIHW - Evolving approaches to answer more complex questions
Measurement of
     Access to GP Care
for Indigenous Australians

     A pilot project
Geospatial data analysis and data linkage work at the AIHW - Evolving approaches to answer more complex questions
6
Geospatial data analysis and data linkage work at the AIHW - Evolving approaches to answer more complex questions
Pilot test

• Western Australia only
• Proof of concept test
  • Does methodology work?
  • Is there variation across areas?
• Preliminary analyses conducted at the Census
  Collection District level (4352 CDs)

                                       7
Index Creation

Index of Need for GP services    Index of Access

           Index of Access compared to Need

                                          8
Map 1
            First step: collate basic
            information on location
            of GP services and
            density of indigenous
            population

        9
Map 1

        10
Requirements for measuring Access
• GIS software (MapInfo)
• Health services:
    •   FTEs and addresses
    •   Medical Directory of Australia, DoHA, RFDS, WAH
•   Geocode the addresses (free online geocoder)
•   Routing Data (Drivetime)
•   CD boundary data (ABS)
•   CD population data (ABS)
                                                11
Spatial accessibility index
• Data on FTEs, locations, drive times, and population
  are used to construct weighted population/provider
  ratios for each service location
• An accessibility score for each CD is then calculated
  using those data
• Result: a numerical index where higher values
  indicate higher spatial accessibility

                                          12
Step 2: Construct
     access index

13
Step 3: Construct
     needs index

14
Combined index of access & needs
• The health needs index is used to adjust the spatial
  access index
• The combined index provides a relative measure of
  access and needs
• Areas with a higher index have better access to
  primary care, adjusted for underlying health needs

                                          15
16
17
Strengths of the approach
•    Can analyse access at a small geographical level, even mesh
     block (2011)
•    Can incorporate need for services if necessary
•    Numerical index quantifies differences
•    Maps make it easy to see differences
•    Can conduct “what-if” analyses
•    Approach can be used for other services
•    Policy implications
    • Comparisons across areas
    • Identify areas requiring greater services
    • Measure impact of change                     18
Potential drawbacks to the approach
• Complex methodology
• Relative index may be hard to interpret
• Measuring change over time in health needs
  requires administrative data at higher
  geographic levels
• Currently cannot include other modes of
  transport
                                  19
Data linkage at the AIHW
Data linkage at the AIHW
•   creating person records from event-based data
•   assessing and improving the quality of information on
    selected administrative data sets
•   supplementing information on one data set with
    information from other data sets to investigate complex
    health and welfare issues for which no single data set can
    provide a complete picture
•   establishing pathways through health and community
    services through the linkage of multiple clinical, health care
    and community services data sets
•   creating researchable databases containing information
    from multiple sources                                      21
Current state – data linkage work
• 15 years data integration experience (87 projects last year)
• highly skilled staff
• the protection of privacy and confidentiality under
  established privacy and ethics regime
• detailed knowledge of, and experience with many, national
  datasets
• experience with dealing with many data custodians
• technical capability and resources for management and
  analysis of large complex datasets
• Now an accredited Commonwealth Integrating Authority
Data Linkage under the IA Framework

                           Linkage and
             linkage        Validation
              fields
Data Set 1
                        Data set and project
                        specific linkage keys
                                                        Data Users / Researchers
             analysis
                               Data       Secure data
Data Set 2    fields
                            Integration     access

                        Integrating Authority
Some examples of linkage projects
• For outside researchers: CT scans in children
• Complex data flows: Diabetes Care Pilot
• AIHW long-term research: Pathways in Aged
  Care
Linkage projects approved at one Ethics Committee
•   Health-related quality of life and long term survival of patients after
    cardiac surgery
•   The Australian Paediatric Cancer Registry
•   Psychopathology following traumatic injury: screening for high risk
•   Investigating the long term psychological impact of bushfire exposure
•   Sedation practices in intensive care in Australia and New Zealand
•   Impact of opioid substitution therapy
•   Geelong osteoporosis study
•   Australian and New Zealand Diabetes and Cancer collaboration
•   National Diabetes Register
•   Validation of the Enhanced Indigenous Mortality Database using NSW
    Native Title register data
CT Scans in Children and Cancer

                Is there a link?

Exposure Data                      Incidence Data
Diabetes Care Pilot
• Three-year pilot of a new model of healthcare
  delivery designed to improve care for people with
  diabetes, 150 practices in three states
• Comparing two intervention groups of general
  practices and a control group
• Elements include better information sharing, flexible
  funding model , Care Facilitator role, education and
  training programs.
• AIHW managing data flow and undertaking linkage
Patient
                Enrolment                Uni              Enrolment
                                                                                     McKinsey
               Survey Data               SA              Information
                                                                                                  Enrolment
DCP                                                                                              Information
Participants                                De-identified
                   Patient Identifiers     Evaluation Data                              Practice data
                                                                     Practice data
                      Survey Data                                                           (e.g.
                                                                                         payments)
                  National Death                                                                          PHC
                       Index
                                                      AIHW
  Diabetes            NDSS data
    Aust.
                                                                           MBS Data
                                Linked Hospital                            PBS Data
                                     Data
                                                                                                                GPs
                                               Patient Identifiers
                              State
                             Health                                                       DoHA
                             Depts
Pathways in Aged Care (PIAC)
Pathways:
system view
Pathways:
person view
Broad strategy:
7 linkage stages

    Source: Karmel et al. 2010
Data linkage
The linkage resulted in:

…linking records of episodes of service use

…at the person level

…to allow statistical analysis of pathways
Case studies: home→package→permanent RAC
                                                                       HACC
                          t               †                            Period of 1st ACAT
 Joe     a                                                             CACP/EACH
                                                                       Respite RAC
                                                                       Permanent RAC
 May
         a            a             a                           †      Death

                          a ta                                   a     Additional ACAT
                      a             a                  †
 John
                                                                 t     Transfer

 Mary
             a

                                          †
 James
                  a

 Mabel

         Year 1                  Year 2       Year 3

                                                           (Example only)
First program after assessment
            50             No previous care group
                                   41
            40
 Per cent

            30

                          19                                     19
            20
                                                      10
            10    6                         5

            0
                 Death   None   HACC/VHC Package    Respite   Permanent
                                                                 RAC

                         First program after assessment
Addressing a policy issue: DoHA asked “are
                 people having unnecessary assessments?”
                      80.0
                      70.0
Per cent of clients

                                                  Continuing path
                      60.0
                      50.0                        HACC and/or VHC
                                                  before
                      40.0                         No previous care
                      30.0
                      20.0
                      10.0
                       0.0
                             0     1         2       3         4+
                                 Number of re-assessments
Data linkage future developments
• Consolidation of new system
• Continuing growing collaboration with data
  custodians, other data linkage institutions and
  researchers
• Increasing number and variety of projects
• Increasing complexity of AIHW role
You can also read