Geospatial data analysis and data linkage work at the AIHW - Evolving approaches to answer more complex questions
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Geospatial data analysis and data linkage work at the AIHW Evolving approaches to answer more complex questions
Who are we? • Major national information and statistics agency with a specialist focus on Australia’s health and welfare • Independent statutory agency established under the AIHW Act (1987) • Strong collaborations with governments, government agencies such as the ABS and PC, and NGOs • Annual budget of around $45m with staff around 400
What do we do? • Custodian of major national health and welfare collections • Provide information and analysis across health, housing and community services sectors in around 150 reports a year • Increasing contribution to performance reporting related to government services in the health and welfare sectors • Manage the MyHospitals website • Taking on an expanding national role in relation to data linkage
Current state – geospatial work • Emerging interest and pockets of capability • Growing recognition of power and importance of geospatially based analysis • Project based approach to geospatial analysis • Most reports contain basic geographic analysis (ARIA, SEIFA) • Focus is on implementation of ASGS into collection design and reporting, but… • Very low dedicated resource for staff or necessary infrastructure 4
Pilot test • Western Australia only • Proof of concept test • Does methodology work? • Is there variation across areas? • Preliminary analyses conducted at the Census Collection District level (4352 CDs) 7
Index Creation Index of Need for GP services Index of Access Index of Access compared to Need 8
Map 1 First step: collate basic information on location of GP services and density of indigenous population 9
Map 1 10
Requirements for measuring Access • GIS software (MapInfo) • Health services: • FTEs and addresses • Medical Directory of Australia, DoHA, RFDS, WAH • Geocode the addresses (free online geocoder) • Routing Data (Drivetime) • CD boundary data (ABS) • CD population data (ABS) 11
Spatial accessibility index • Data on FTEs, locations, drive times, and population are used to construct weighted population/provider ratios for each service location • An accessibility score for each CD is then calculated using those data • Result: a numerical index where higher values indicate higher spatial accessibility 12
Step 2: Construct access index 13
Step 3: Construct needs index 14
Combined index of access & needs • The health needs index is used to adjust the spatial access index • The combined index provides a relative measure of access and needs • Areas with a higher index have better access to primary care, adjusted for underlying health needs 15
16
17
Strengths of the approach • Can analyse access at a small geographical level, even mesh block (2011) • Can incorporate need for services if necessary • Numerical index quantifies differences • Maps make it easy to see differences • Can conduct “what-if” analyses • Approach can be used for other services • Policy implications • Comparisons across areas • Identify areas requiring greater services • Measure impact of change 18
Potential drawbacks to the approach • Complex methodology • Relative index may be hard to interpret • Measuring change over time in health needs requires administrative data at higher geographic levels • Currently cannot include other modes of transport 19
Data linkage at the AIHW
Data linkage at the AIHW • creating person records from event-based data • assessing and improving the quality of information on selected administrative data sets • supplementing information on one data set with information from other data sets to investigate complex health and welfare issues for which no single data set can provide a complete picture • establishing pathways through health and community services through the linkage of multiple clinical, health care and community services data sets • creating researchable databases containing information from multiple sources 21
Current state – data linkage work • 15 years data integration experience (87 projects last year) • highly skilled staff • the protection of privacy and confidentiality under established privacy and ethics regime • detailed knowledge of, and experience with many, national datasets • experience with dealing with many data custodians • technical capability and resources for management and analysis of large complex datasets • Now an accredited Commonwealth Integrating Authority
Data Linkage under the IA Framework Linkage and linkage Validation fields Data Set 1 Data set and project specific linkage keys Data Users / Researchers analysis Data Secure data Data Set 2 fields Integration access Integrating Authority
Some examples of linkage projects • For outside researchers: CT scans in children • Complex data flows: Diabetes Care Pilot • AIHW long-term research: Pathways in Aged Care
Linkage projects approved at one Ethics Committee • Health-related quality of life and long term survival of patients after cardiac surgery • The Australian Paediatric Cancer Registry • Psychopathology following traumatic injury: screening for high risk • Investigating the long term psychological impact of bushfire exposure • Sedation practices in intensive care in Australia and New Zealand • Impact of opioid substitution therapy • Geelong osteoporosis study • Australian and New Zealand Diabetes and Cancer collaboration • National Diabetes Register • Validation of the Enhanced Indigenous Mortality Database using NSW Native Title register data
CT Scans in Children and Cancer Is there a link? Exposure Data Incidence Data
Diabetes Care Pilot • Three-year pilot of a new model of healthcare delivery designed to improve care for people with diabetes, 150 practices in three states • Comparing two intervention groups of general practices and a control group • Elements include better information sharing, flexible funding model , Care Facilitator role, education and training programs. • AIHW managing data flow and undertaking linkage
Patient Enrolment Uni Enrolment McKinsey Survey Data SA Information Enrolment DCP Information Participants De-identified Patient Identifiers Evaluation Data Practice data Practice data Survey Data (e.g. payments) National Death PHC Index AIHW Diabetes NDSS data Aust. MBS Data Linked Hospital PBS Data Data GPs Patient Identifiers State Health DoHA Depts
Pathways in Aged Care (PIAC)
Pathways: system view
Pathways: person view
Broad strategy: 7 linkage stages Source: Karmel et al. 2010
Data linkage The linkage resulted in: …linking records of episodes of service use …at the person level …to allow statistical analysis of pathways
Case studies: home→package→permanent RAC HACC t † Period of 1st ACAT Joe a CACP/EACH Respite RAC Permanent RAC May a a a † Death a ta a Additional ACAT a a † John t Transfer Mary a † James a Mabel Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 (Example only)
First program after assessment 50 No previous care group 41 40 Per cent 30 19 19 20 10 10 6 5 0 Death None HACC/VHC Package Respite Permanent RAC First program after assessment
Addressing a policy issue: DoHA asked “are people having unnecessary assessments?” 80.0 70.0 Per cent of clients Continuing path 60.0 50.0 HACC and/or VHC before 40.0 No previous care 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 0 1 2 3 4+ Number of re-assessments
Data linkage future developments • Consolidation of new system • Continuing growing collaboration with data custodians, other data linkage institutions and researchers • Increasing number and variety of projects • Increasing complexity of AIHW role
You can also read