Functional status of men with the fragile X premutation, with and without the tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS)
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 1101–1109. Published online 29 April 2009 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/gps.2231 Functional status of men with the fragile X premutation, with and without the tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) Angela G. Brega1,2, Ann Reynolds3, Rachael E. Bennett1,4, Maureen A. Leehey5, Lanee S. Bounds1, Jennifer B. Cogswell 6, Randi J. Hagerman 6,7, Paul J. Hagerman 8 and Jim Grigsby 1,4* 1 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA 2 Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA 3 Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA 4 Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA 5 Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA 6 M.I.N.D. Institute, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA 7 Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA 8 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA SUMMARY Background Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), which occurs in some premutation carriers of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene, is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by action tremor, gait ataxia, and impaired executive cognitive functioning. Objective To evaluate the nature and severity of functional limitations among male carriers of the fragile X premutation, both with and without FXTAS. Methods Forty-two subjects with FXTAS and 24 asymptomatic premutation carriers were compared to 32 control subjects on measures of physical functioning, activities of daily living (ADLs; e.g. eating, bathing), and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs; e.g. shopping, managing medications). Ordinary least squares regression, controlling for age, education, medical comorbidity, and pain, was used to examine group differences in physical and functional performance. Results Men with FXTAS performed significantly worse than control subjects on all dependent measures, showing greater limitations in physical functioning, as well as ADL and IADL performance ( p < 0.05). Subsequent analyses suggested that physical and functional impairments among men with FXTAS result largely from deficits in motor and executive functioning and that CGG repeat length is associated with functional impairment. Asymptomatic carriers of the fragile X premutation performed similarly to control subjects on all measures. Conclusions This study provides the first comprehensive evaluation of functional status among male premutation carriers. Although carriers without FXTAS performed similarly to control subjects, men with FXTAS showed evidence of significant physical and functional impairment, which appears to result largely from motor and executive deficits characteristic of the syndrome. Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. key words — fragile X; fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome; FXTAS; functional status; activities of daily living; instrumental activities of daily living INTRODUCTION with the fragile X premutation. The premutation is characterized by 55–200 CGG repeats in the 50 Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS; untranslated region of the fragile X mental retardation Hagerman et al., 2001) affects a subset of individuals 1 (FMR1) gene. Symptoms of FXTAS include action tremor and gait ataxia, and often are accompanied by *Correspondence to: Dr J. Grigsby, Department of Psychology, Uni- parkinsonism, dysautonomia, peripheral neuropathy, versity of Colorado Denver, Campus Box 173, P.O. Box 173364, weakness, and other neurologic signs (Jacquemont Denver, CO 80217-3364, USA. E-mail: jim.grigsby@ucdenver.edu et al., 2003; Leehey et al., 2007). FXTAS involves Received 22 August 2008 Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Accepted 7 January 2009
1102 a. g. brega ET AL. substantial impairment of the executive cognitive were three years younger than controls (mean age 60.9 functions (ECF; Grigsby et al., 2006; Berry-Kravis vs 64.2 years), this difference was not significant et al., 2007a,b; Grigsby et al., 2007; Leehey et al., ( p > 0.10). To eliminate confounding by age, all men 2007; Brega et al., 2008; Grigsby et al., 2008), inclu- under the age of 53—the age of the youngest FXTAS ding deficits in behavioral self-regulation, attention, participant—were excluded. Omitting these subjects and working memory. A majority of males with the pre- (four APCs and seven controls) eliminated the signi- mutation develop FXTAS (Jacquemont et al., 2004). ficant age difference between FXTAS and controls. We studied physical limitations, and deficits in activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs), among male carriers of the premuta- Assessment of functional status tion. Whereas ADLs (e.g. eating, bathing) represent simple aspects of self-care, IADLs (e.g. meal prepara- ECF deficits have been reported among premutation tion) are cognitively more complex. We expected that carriers (e.g. Grigsby et al., 2006, 2007; Brega et al., men with FXTAS would suffer impairment of 2008; Grigsby et al., 2008), and because such functional status as a result of the motor and ECF individuals may have limited insight and be unable deficits characteristic of the disorder. to evaluate their functional status accurately, we report data collected from informants. For 91% of cases, the informant was a spouse or significant other who lived METHODS with the subject. An additional 4% of informants were siblings or adult children of participants. Subjects Physical limitations were measured using the Nagi Participants provided written informed consent and and Rosow/Breslau physical disability items (Nagi, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 1976), which assess ability to walk a quarter of a mile; (HIPAA) authorization. The research was approved by climb ten steps without resting; stoop, crouch, or institutional review boards (IRBs) at the University of kneel; reach overhead; use fingers to grasp objects; Colorado Denver and the University of California and carry up to 10 lbs. Informants indicated whether Davis. The authors have no financial or personal the subject had difficulty completing each activity by interests to disclose. himself, without special equipment. The mean of yes/ Participants were 98 men aged 53–89, each of no (1/0) responses across the six items, reflecting the whom was assigned to one of three study groups. The proportion of the physical activities for which difficulty FXTAS group included 42 subjects with definite or was reported, was used as a measure of physical limitations. probable FXTAS (Jacquemont et al., 2003). Men with Measures from the Longitudinal Study on Aging the FMR1 premutation without signs of FXTAS (Katz et al., 1963; Duke University, 1988) were used (n ¼ 24) were classified as asymptomatic premutation to assess ADL/IADL independence. Informants carriers (APC). The control group included 32 men indicated whether the subject had difficulty complet- with normal FMR1 alleles. Participants were native ing seven ADLs by himself, without special equip- English speakers with no history of any neurologic ment: bathing/showering; dressing; eating; using the disorder other than FXTAS. Each subject had a family toilet; transferring in and out of bed or chair; walking member or friend who was knowledgeable and willing across a small room; getting outside. The ADL to answer questions about the individual’s functional limitations score, the mean of these seven dichot- status. Premutation carriers were identified through omous yes/no (1/0) variables, represents the pro- earlier studies, fragile X meetings or support groups, portion of ADLs performed with difficulty. and the clinical practices of study co-investigators; The IADL limitations score provides a measure of control subjects were recruited from the families of subjects’ difficulty engaging in eight IADLs indepen- carriers, medical clinics, and advertisements. dently (without special equipment): meal preparation; Of the 124 men enrolled in the study, 14 were driving; shopping; using the phone; managing excluded from these analyses because of missing medications; managing money; strenuous housework; functional status data. One man, a mosaic having a light housework. As with ADLs, the score reflects that ‘smear’ CGG repeat pattern ranging from the normal proportion of IADLs performed with difficulty. IADL to the full mutation range, also was excluded. In the items included an additional response option indicat- remaining sample of 109 participants, men with ing that a subject does not perform a task for reasons FXTAS were older than controls (mean age 68.6 vs other than disability (e.g. wife always does the 64.2 years; p < 0.05). Although asymptomatic carriers cooking). Such responses were coded as missing. Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 1101–1109. DOI: 10.1002/gps
functional status in fxtas 1103 To examine subtle deficits in functional status, et al., 2005; Grigsby et al., 2006, 2007; Brega et al., informants were asked to indicate whether subjects 2008; Grigsby et al., 2008). Higher scores (out of a had changed either: (a) the frequency of performing an total of 27) reflect better functioning. individual ADL/IADL, or (b) the manner of perform- ance (Guralnik et al., 1999; Fried et al., 2000). The three frequency response options were no; yes, less Data analysis frequently; and yes, doesn’t do it anymore). The two Regression models compared physical and functional ‘yes’ responses were collapsed to yield dichotomous performance across groups. For each dependent vari- (yes/no) variables and the average value for ADL and able, separate models examined the impact of two IADL variables, respectively, were computed. The group-comparison variables: (a) APC [1] vs control degree to which a subject had changed the way he [0], and (b) FXTAS [1] vs control [0]. To evaluate the completed ADL/IADLs was computed as the mean of contribution of motor and ECF deficits to differences the yes/no (1/0) method change variables. The ADL/ in functional performance, regression models compar- IADL frequency change variables and the ADL/IADL ing FXTAS to control subjects were repeated using method change variables represent the proportion of PPT dominant hand score as a covariate, and again ADLs or IADLs, respectively, for which a subject had using BDS as a covariate. changed frequency or method. Covariates. We adjusted for age and years of Motor and executive impairments education in all analyses. Further, because perform- ance of functional tasks can be influenced by We hypothesized that FXTAS-related motor impair- comorbidity and pain (Bryant et al., 2007), we ment would contribute to group differences in physical controlled for these variables in all analyses as well. limitations and ADL/IADL performance. Although To capture co-existent medical illness, we used the not all functional tasks depend on fine motor skills, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), a weighted several are likely to be impaired as a result of tremor measure of medical comorbidity (Charlson et al., (e.g. dressing, eating). The Purdue Pegboard Test 1987), based on a set of 17 differently weighted ICD-9 (PPT; Tiffin and Asher, 1948) was used to quantify diagnoses. The degree to which pain interfered with motor impairment. The PPT is a test of motor function subjects’ regular activities (e.g. moving around, work, in which subjects rapidly insert small metal pegs into sleeping) was measured using items from the San Luis holes on a pegboard. The number of pegs inserted Valley Health and Aging Study (SLVHAS; Hamman during a 30-sec trial using the dominant hand was used et al., 1999), controlled for the influence of pain on to quantify fine motor deficits. functional status. The mean of these dichotomous Men with FXTAS have impaired ECF (Grigsby responses, reflecting the proportion of activities et al., 2006, 2007; Leehey et al., 2007; Brega et al., negatively affected by pain, was used as a covariate 2008; Grigsby et al., 2008). ECF impairment limits an in all analyses. individual’s ability to regulate his/her behavior through planning, initiating appropriate activity, and inhibiting inappropriate behaviors. We hypothesized RESULTS that ECF deficits would contribute to functional Sample descriptives impairment. IADLs, which require planning and step- by-step execution of goal-directed activity, were Table 1 provides descriptive information about the expected to be particularly affected by ECF deficits. sample. Although truncation of the sample ensured As ADLs are less complex activities, for which that the two carrier groups did not differ significantly behavioral self-regulation over time is less crucial, we from the control group with regard to age, men with expected ADLs as well as physical limitations to be FXTAS were older on average than APCs ( p < 0.01). less severely affected by ECF deficits. This age difference likely reflects the fact that the The measure of ECF used in this study was the prevalence of FXTAS increases with age (Jacquemont Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale (BDS), a measure of the et al., 2004). Note that no premutation carrier over the capacity for behavioral self-regulation (Grigsby et al., age of 73 was classified as asymptomatic. Because of 1992; Diesfeldt et al., 2004; Ecklund-Johnson et al., the marked age difference between APCs and men 2004). The BDS has consistently demonstrated with FXTAS, we did not compare functional status deficits among persons with both the fragile X full between the carrier groups, but instead compared each mutation and FXTAS (Hagerman et al., 2001; Loesch premutation group separately to controls. Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 1101–1109. DOI: 10.1002/gps
1104 a. g. brega ET AL. Table 1. Participant characteristics by group: mean (range)a FXTAS (n ¼ 42) Asymptomatic carrier (n ¼ 24) Control (n ¼ 32) Ageb 68.6 (53–89) 63.7 (55–73) 67.2 (54–89) Years of Educationb 15.3** (8–21) 16.0* (12–19) 17.3 (10–21) CGG Repeatc 95.9 (67–142) 79.2 (60–112) 30.5 (18–45) a Table 1 presents unadjusted means (and ranges) for participants in the three study groups. b When appropriate, significant differences between each premutation group and the control group are indicated. c Men with FXTAS had significantly higher CGG repeat expansions than did their asymptomatic counterparts ( p < 0.0001). *p < 0.10; **p 0.01. Participants were relatively highly educated. In early as their late forties (minimum age of onset was each study group, subjects had 15 or more years of 47 for ataxia and 48 for tremor), for some subjects, education on average. Controls had significantly more these symptoms first appeared in the late seventies years of education than did men with FXTAS ( p < (maximum age of onset was 78 for ataxia and 79 for 0.01) and marginally more than APCs ( p < 0.10). tremor). Mean age of onset of tremor and ataxia was Whereas the majority of APCs (71%) and controls 61. Men in this sample developed FXTAS (75%) in this sample had 16 or more years of symptoms 9.1 years prior to assessment, on education, only 43% of men with FXTAS had attained average, although duration of disease ranged from 0 a similar degree of education. Analyses therefore to 22 years. controlled for education. The two defining neurologic signs of FXTAS The premutation carrier groups differed with regard developed at similar ages for most subjects. Sixty to CGG repeat length (Table 1). Men with FXTAS had percent of subjects with tremor and ataxia experienced significantly more repeats than did APCs ( p < 0.0001). onset of both symptoms within a 3-year period. Although both carrier groups had members with CGG Typically, however, tremor predated ataxia. Whereas repeats in the sixties, large expansions were more 40% of FXTAS subjects developed tremor prior to common among men with FXTAS. Whereas only one ataxia, 37% developed ataxia first. For 23%, the onset asymptomatic carrier had a CGG repeat length greater of tremor and ataxia occurred at the same age. than 94, 22 men with FXTAS (52%) had 95 repeats or more. Group differences in functional performance Among men with FXTAS, most had both tremor and ataxia (79%). An additional 12% had ataxia only, Regression analyses provided evidence of functional whereas 10% had tremor only. Age of onset of the two impairment among men with FXTAS (Table 2). In key neurologic signs of FXTAS ranged widely and comparison with controls, men with FXTAS showed was not correlated with CGG repeat length ( p > 0.10). more physical limitations ( p < 0.01). Whereas Although some subjects developed tremor/ataxia as FXTAS subjects had difficulty with 42% of the six Table 2. Functional status: premutation groups vs controlsa FXTAS Asymptomatic carrier Control (Mean) (n ¼ 42) (Mean) (n ¼ 24) (Mean) (n ¼ 32) Physical Limitations Score 0.42*** 0.18* 0.11 ADL Limitations Score 0.19** 0.03 0.03 ADL Frequency Change Score 0.20** 0.01 0.05 ADL Method Change Score 0.25*** 0.02 0.02 IADL Limitations Score 0.26*** 0.04 0.03 IADL Frequency Change Score 0.25*** 0.02 0.04 IADL Method Change Score 0.15*** 0.00 0.02 a Table 2 presents mean scores by group as well as the results of separate regression analyses comparing control subjects to subjects in the two premutation groups. *p < 0.10; **p 0.05; ***p 0.01. Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 1101–1109. DOI: 10.1002/gps
functional status in fxtas 1105 physical limitation items, on average, controls interfered with daily activities was a significant experienced difficulty with only 11%. predictor of physical limitations (p < 0.001, r2 ¼ 0.23), ADL performance also was impaired among men ADL limitations ( p < 0.01, r2 ¼ 0.20), ADL fre- with FXTAS. These subjects experienced limitations quency change ( p < 0.01, r2 ¼ 0.21), ADL method in a larger proportion of ADLs ( p < 0.05) than did change ( p < 0.05, r2 ¼ 0.14), and IADL method controls (19% vs 3%, respectively). In addition, men change ( p < 0.05, r2 ¼ 0.16). Age was a significant with FXTAS were more likely than controls to have predictor of ADL method change ( p < 0.05, r2 ¼ 0.08) changed the frequency of ADL performance and was marginally related to ADL limitations ( p < 0.05) as well as their method for performing ( p < 0.10). Comorbidity predicted ADL frequency these tasks ( p < 0.01). FXTAS subjects had changed change ( p < 0.05, r2 ¼ 0.07) and was marginally the frequency with which they performed 20% of associated with IADL limitations and IADL method ADLs and had changed the method for completing change ( p < 0.10). Education was marginally associ- 25%. In contrast, controls had changed the frequency ated with IADL method change (p < 0.10). for completing 5% of ADLs and the method for Among men with FXTAS, CGG repeat length completing 2% of these activities. predicted functional status. Post-hoc analyses regres- Compared with controls, FXTAS subjects scored sing functional measures on CGG repeat length significantly worse on IADLs ( p < 0.01). Whereas showed that men with larger repeat expansions scored controls had difficulty with 3% of the eight IADLs, on significantly worse on ADL frequency change average, men with FXTAS had difficulty with 26% of ( p < 0.05), IADL limitations ( p < 0.01), and IADL IADLs. FXTAS subjects also were more likely than frequency change ( p < 0.001), and marginally worse controls to have changed the frequency ( p ¼ 0.01) and on physical and ADL limitations ( p < 0.10). method with which IADLs were performed ( p < 0.01). APCs showed little evidence of the functional Whereas men with FXTAS had changed the frequency limitations experienced by FXTAS subjects. Although with which they conducted 25% of IADLs and the there was a trend for APCs to experience greater physical method with which they completed 15%, controls had limitations than controls ( p < 0.10), this difference changed frequency or method for only a small was not significant. APCs performed similarly to percentage of tasks (4% and 2%, respectively). controls on all other measures of functional status. Regression analyses examining group differences Table 3 provides information about impairment of in functional status controlled for age, education, specific ADLs and IADLs by group. Among ADLs, comorbidities, and pain. The degree to which pain men with FXTAS were particularly likely to Table 3. Impairment of specific ADLs and IADLs Limitations reported (%) Frequency has changed (%) Method has changed (%) FXTAS Asymptomatic Control FXTAS Asymptomatic Control FXTAS Asymptomatic Control Carrier Carrier Carrier ADLs Bathing 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 19.0% 0.0% 3.2% 28.6% 0.0% 3.2% Dressing 19.0% 8.7% 3.2% 9.5% 0.0% 3.2% 33.3% 4.4% 3.2% Eating 11.9% 0.0% 6.4% 7.3% 0.0% 6.4% 21.4% 0.0% 3.2% Toileting 9.5% 4.4% 3.2% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% Transferring 35.7% 8.7% 6.4% 21.4% 0.0% 6.4% 35.7% 8.7% 3.2% Crossing a Room 21.4% 0.0% 0.0% 26.2% 4.4% 6.4% 24.4% 4.4% 0.0% Getting Outside 21.4% 0.0% 3.2% 40.5% 0.0% 9.7% 14.6% 0.0% 0.0% IADLs Meal Preparation 15.2% 4.6% 0.0% 11.9% 0.0% 6.4% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% Driving 31.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 18.0% 0.0% 0.0% Shopping 27.5% 4.6% 3.4% 21.4% 4.6% 3.2% 22.5% 0.0% 0.0% Telephone 4.8% 0.0% 3.2% 9.5% 0.0% 3.2% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% Managing Medication 19.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.1% 0.0% 0.0% 9.8% 0.0% 0.0% Managing Money 23.5% 4.8% 0.0% 19.0% 4.4% 0.0% 15.0% 0.0% 0.0% Strenuous Housework 62.2% 17.4% 18.5% 59.5% 4.4% 22.6% 37.5% 0.0% 12.9% Light Housework 18.9% 0.0% 0.0% 34.2% 0.0% 0.0% 14.6% 0.0% 0.0% Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 1101–1109. DOI: 10.1002/gps
1106 a. g. brega ET AL. experience difficulty transferring to or from a bed or Table 4. Number of impaired ADLs and IADLs: percentages by chair (36%). Further, about one-fifth of FXTAS groupa subjects were reported to have difficulty with FXTAS Asymptomatic Control ambulation (i.e. crossing a room, getting outdoors) (n ¼ 42) Carrier (n ¼ 24) (n ¼ 32) and dressing. Changes in the frequency for completing the transferring, ambulation, and bathing ADLs were ADLs 0 50.0% 87.0% 83.9% common among men with FXTAS (19–40%). A 1 11.9% 8.7% 9.7% substantial proportion of men with FXTAS had 2 14.3% 0.0% 6.4% changed their method for bathing, dressing, eating, 3 14.3% 4.4% 0.0% transferring, and crossing a room (21–36%). 4 or more 9.5% 0.0% 0.0% With respect to IADLs, strenuous housework was IADLs particularly problematic for men with FXTAS, with 0 38.1% 73.9% 80.6% difficulty reported for over one-half. Approximately 1 23.8% 21.7% 16.1% one-fifth to one-third experienced difficulty with 2 4.8% 4.4% 3.2% driving, shopping, managing medications, managing 3 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 4 or more 19.0% 0.0% 0.0% money, and light housework. A substantial proportion of FXTAS subjects had changed the frequency for a Not all totals equal 100% due to rounding. activities related to driving, shopping, managing money, and housework. Changing the method for driving, shopping, and completing strenuous house- work was common. third of men with FXTAS experienced limitations with Table 4 shows the number of functional items with three or more IADLs, but no APCs or controls did so. which members of each group had difficulty. Whereas 50% of men with FXTAS experienced no difficulty Motor and executive impairment with ADLs, 87% and 84% of APCs and controls, respectively, had no ADL limitations. Difficulty with In secondary sets of analyses, we explored the degree multiple ADLs was more common among men with to which motor and ECF impairment contribute to FXTAS. Whereas 24% of individuals with FXTAS had functional limitations among men with FXTAS difficulty with three or more ADLs, this was true for (Table 5). We recomputed regression models reported only 4.4% of APCs and none of the controls. previously, controlling for motor performance in one A similar pattern of results was found related to set of models and BDS score in a second set of models. IADLs. The percentage of men with no IADL When motor functioning was controlled, group limitations was lower in the FXTAS group (38%) differences became nonsignificant for all dependent than the APC (74%) and control (81%) groups. One- measures except ADL and IADL method change Table 5. Mediating role of motor and executive functioning: FXTAS vs control subjectsa Effect of group (t) Independent effect of mediator (t, r2) No mediators Motor score BDS score Motor BDS controlled controlled controlled score score Physical Limitations 3.01*** 1.91* 3.17*** 1.75* (0.10) 1.08 (0.00) ADL Limitations 2.18** 0.87 1.47 2.27** (0.11) 0.98 (0.04) ADL Frequency Change 2.12** 1.08 1.52 1.51 (0.07) 0.76 (0.03) ADL Method Change 3.04*** 2.06** 2.47** 1.22 (0.08) 0.44 (0.03) IADL Limitations 2.82*** 1.26 1.44 2.42** (0.14) 2.47** (0.14) IADL Frequency Change 2.59*** 1.29 1.15 1.72* (0.10) 2.69*** (0.15) IADL Method Change 2.91*** 2.35** 2.07** 0.02 (0.02) 1.08** (0.06) a Table 5 presents the results of regression analyses comparing the impact of the group comparison variable (FXTAS vs control) when motor functioning and executive functioning are controlled and are not controlled. T values and significance for the group variable as well as t values, significance, and effect sizes for the motor and executive functioning variables are reported. *p < 0.10; **p 0.05; ***p 0.01. Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 1101–1109. DOI: 10.1002/gps
functional status in fxtas 1107 variables, for which the group effect was reduced but among men with FXTAS. Although controlling for not eliminated. Similarly, inclusion of BDS score motor and executive functioning did reduce group eliminated group differences for all dependent differences in the ADL and IADL method change measures except the physical limitations score and variables, FXTAS subjects still performed signifi- the ADL and IADL method change variables. cantly worse than their healthy counterparts. These Motor and ECF scores were not always independent results suggest that functional impairment among men predictors of the dependent measures. Motor score with FXTAS is largely a result of the motor symptoms was a significant predictor of ADL and IADL and executive dysfunction that accompany the limitations scores, and was marginally related to syndrome. physical limitations and IADL frequency change. As This finding of a contribution by both ECF and expected, ECF was more closely related to IADL than motor impairment is reasonable given that fine motor ADL functioning, serving as a significant predictor of control is necessary for performance of most ADL/ all three IADL scores. Even when not significantly IADLs. ECF fundamentally represents the capacity to related to dependent measures, however, the addition plan, initiate, monitor, adjust, and complete purpose- of these mediating variables had a strong effect on the ful activity. Hence, significant ECF deficits may affect relationship between group and functional perform- functional status even when one has the motor ance. These results suggest that functional limitations capacity to perform ADLs and IADLs (Grigsby among men with FXTAS result largely from impair- et al., 1998). ment in motor and executive functioning. APCs demonstrated no significant functional impair- ment. Although they had marginally higher physical limitations scores, average performance on the ADL DISCUSSION and IADL dependent measures in this group was similar The results provide a comprehensive picture of the to that of control subjects. Given that motor function- nature and severity of functional impairment in FXTAS. ing–which is normal in this group–is a key contributor to Men with FXTAS had significantly more physical and physical and functional deficits, it is reasonable that functional limitations than did control subjects. Both APCs would show no ADL/IADL deficits. ADL and IADL performance was affected, although Our data are consistent with those of Mioshi et al. men with FXTAS showed impairment of a greater (2007), who studied ADLs in persons with fronto- proportion of IADLs than ADLs. Among men with temporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer disease. In FXTAS, larger CGG repeat expansions were associ- particular, they noted significant problems in func- ated with greater functional impairment. tional status among individuals with the behavioral It is possible that IADL impairment was more variant of FTD (bv-FTD). Interestingly, they noted common than ADL deficits because the former cate- that bv-FTD subjects scored well on the Mini Mental gory of functional activities relies somewhat more on State Exam (MMSE; Folstein et al., 1975), a finding complex motor skills. Bivariate correlations showed a similar to what we have reported in FXTAS (Grigsby slightly stronger relationship between motor score and et al., 2007; Brega et al., 2008). IADL limitations (r ¼ 0.51, p < 0.0001) than bet- Individuals with FXTAS may have significant needs ween motor score and ADL limitations (r ¼ 0.46, for assistance with ADLs and IADLs as the syndrome p < 0.0001). Further, perhaps IADLs are cognitively progresses, although both the present study and that of more demanding than ADLs. Previous research has Mioshi and associates, were limited to cross-sectional demonstrated that ECF, is consistently a stronger data. Longitudinal studies will provide more useful predictor of IADLs than ADLs (Kaye et al., 1990; and compelling data on the nature and progression of Suchy et al., 1997; Grigsby et al., 1998, 2000, 2002). FXTAS. This study complements the work of Leehey Functional impairment among men with FXTAS et al. (2007), who found that in FXTAS, tremor creates was heavily influenced by deficits in motor and considerable disability within approximately 13 years executive functioning. As expected, motor function- from onset of motor symptoms. By 16 years post- ing, but not ECF, accounted for some of the physical onset, half of patients with FXTAS show significant limitations experienced by men with FXTAS. Both ADL difficulty. motor ability and ECF accounted for group differences in ADL and IADL limitations as well as ADL and CONCLUSION IADL frequency change. Impairment of fine motor skills and of the capacity for behavioral self-regulation This study provides the first detailed description of the each contributed to these functional impairments nature and severity of functional impairment among Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 1101–1109. DOI: 10.1002/gps
1108 a. g. brega ET AL. Dyscontrol Scale (BDS). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 19: 1065– KEY POINTS 1073. Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Devel- Men with FXTAS demonstrate significant opment. 1988. Multidimensional Functional Assessment: The impairment of physical and functional abilities. OARS Methodology. Duke University Press: Durham, NC. Asymptomatic carriers of the fragile X pre- Ecklund-Johnson E, Miller SA, Sweet JJ. 2004. Confirmatory factor mutation perform similarly to control subjects analysis of the behavioral dyscontrol scale in a mixed clinical with regard to physical and functional status. sample. Clin Neuropsychol 18: 395–410. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. 1975. ‘Mini-Mental State’. Motor and executive impairment are key A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for contributors to physical and functional impair- the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12: 189–198. ment among men with FXTAS. Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K, Chaves PH, Johnson BA. 2000. Pre- clinical mobility disability predicts incident mobility disability in older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55: M43–52. Grigsby J, Brega AG, Engle K, et al. 2008. Cognitive profile of fragile X premutation carriers with and without fragile X-associ- male carriers of the fragile X premutation. Although ated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Neuropsychology 22: 48–60. men with FXTAS experience significant functional Grigsby J, Brega AG, Jacquemont S, et al. 2006. Impairment in the deficits, asymptomatic carriers show no significant cognitive functioning of men with fragile X-associated tremor/ ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). J Neurol Sci 248: 227–233. sign of physical or functional limitations. Impaired motor Grigsby J, Brega AG, Leehey MA, et al. 2007. Impairment of functioning and ECF appear to be key contributors to executive cognitive functioning in males with fragile X-associ- functional impairment among men with FXTAS. ated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Mov Disord 22: 645–650. Grigsby J, Kaye K, Baxter J, et al. 1998. Executive cognitive abilities and functional status among community-dwelling older CONFLICT OF INTEREST persons in the San Luis Valley Health and Aging Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 46: 590–596. None known. Grigsby J, Kaye K, Eilertsen TB, Kramer AM. 2000. The Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale and functional status among elderly medical and surgical rehab patients. J Clin Geropsychol 6: 259–268. Grigsby J, Kaye K, Kowalsky J, Kramer AM. 2002. Relationship ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS between functional status and the capacity to regulate behavior Funding for this study was provided by National among elderly persons following hip fracture. Rehabilitative Psychol 47: 291–307. Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grigsby J, Kaye K, Robbins LJ. 1992. Reliabilities, norms and factor (NINDS) grant number NS044299 (JG). structure of the Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale. Percept Mot Skills We would like to express our gratitude to the 74: 883–892. participants and their families for taking part in this Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Penninx BW, et al. 1999. New and worsening conditions and change in physical and cognitive study. performance during weekly evaluations over 6 months: The Women’s Health and Aging Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 54: M410–422. Hagerman RJ, Leehey M, Heinrichs W, et al. 2001. Intention tremor, REFERENCES parkinsonism, and generalized brain atrophy in male carriers of fragile X. Neurology 57: 127–130. Berry-Kravis E, Abrams L, Coffey SM, et al. 2007a. Fragile X- Hamman RF, Mulgrew CL, Baxter J, et al. 1999. Methods and associated tremor/ataxia syndrome: Clinical features, genetics, prevalence of ADL limitations in Hispanic and non-Hispanic and testing guidelines. Mov Disord 22: 2018–2030. white subjects in rural Colorado: The San Luis Valley Health and Berry-Kravis E, Goetz CG, Leehey MA, et al. 2007b. Neuropathic Aging Study. Ann Epidemiol 9: 225–235. features in fragile X premutation carriers. Am J Med Genet A 143: Jacquemont S, Hagerman RJ, Leehey M, et al. 2003. Fragile X 19–26. premutation tremor/ataxia syndrome: Molecular, clinical, and Brega AG, Goodrich G, Bennett RE, et al. 2008. The primary neuroimaging correlates. Am J Hum Genet 72: 869–878. cognitive deficit among males with fragile X-associated tre- Jacquemont S, Hagerman RJ, Leehey MA, et al. 2004. Penetrance of mor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is a dysexecutive syndrome. the fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome in a premutation J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Feb 15: 1–17. carrier population. J Am Med Assoc 291: 460–469. Bryant LL, Grigsby J, Swenson C, et al. 2007. Chronic pain Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, et al. 1963. Studies of illness in increases the risk of decreasing physical performance in older the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of bio- adults: The San Luis Valley Health and Aging Study. J Gerontol A logical and psychosocial function. J Am Med Assoc 185: 94–101. Biol Sci Med Sci 62: 989–996. Kaye K, Grigsby J, Robbins LJ, Korzun B. 1990. Prediction of Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie CR. 1987. A new independent functioning and behavior problems in geriatric method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 38: 1304–1310. studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40: 373–383. Leehey MA, Berry-Kravis E, Min SJ, et al. 2007. Progression of Diesfeldt HF. 2004. Executive functioning in psychogeriatric tremor and ataxia in male carriers of the FMR1 premutation. Mov patients: scalability and construct validity of the Behavioral Disord 22: 203–206. Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 1101–1109. DOI: 10.1002/gps
functional status in fxtas 1109 Loesch DZ, Churchyard A, Brotchie P, et al. 2005. Evidence for, and Nagi S. 1976. An epidemiology of disability among adults in the a spectrum of, neurological involvement in carriers of the fragile United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q 54: 439–468. X pre-mutation: FXTAS and beyond. Clin Genet 67: 412– Suchy Y, Blint A, Osmon DC. 1997. Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale: 417. Criterion and predictive validity in an inpatient rehabilitation unit Mioshi E, Kipps CM, Dawson K, Mitchell J, Graham A, Hodges JR. population. Clin Neuropsychol 11: 258–265. 2007. Activities of daily living in frontotemporal dementia and Tiffin J, Asher EJ. 1948. The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and studies of Alzheimer disease. Neurology 68: 2077–2084. reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol 32: 234–247. Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 1101–1109. DOI: 10.1002/gps
You can also read