First record of the lawn chinch bug Blissus insularis Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae) in Europe
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Phytoparasitica (2021) 49:539–545 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-021-00903-1 SHORT COMMUNICATION First record of the lawn chinch bug Blissus insularis Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae) in Europe Arlindo Lima & Tatiana Valada & Maria Filomena Caetano & José Carlos Franco & Ana Paula Ramos Received: 6 January 2021 / Accepted: 22 February 2021 / Published online: 5 March 2021 # The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021 Abstract Since October 2019, chinch bugs have been Keywords Chinch bugs . St. Augustinegrass . Lawn detected in large sunken dead patches of St. pests . Invasive species . Portugal Augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum) lawns in different locations of Lisbon and Setubal districts, in Portugal. Based on morphological and molecular stud- Introduction ies, using mitochondrial Cytochrome C Oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, the collected insects were identified as The St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum Blissus insularis (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Blissidae). (Walter) O. Kuntze (Poaceae: Panicoidae), is a perennial This is the first record of this noxious chinch bug species grass that includes fertile diploids and sterile polyploids. in Europe and in the Palaearctic region. Since the beginning of botanical explorations, the com- mon diploid type has been found as a coastal pioneer on both sides of the Atlantic and later one triploid form of this species first appeared in the Cape of Good Hope A. Lima (*) : A. P. Ramos region (Sauer 1972). St. Augustinegrass was introduced LEAF, Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisbon, in Asia, Australia, New Zealand, Pacific islands and Portugal some areas of USA and Europe, mainly with horticul- e-mail: arlindolima@isa.ulisboa.pt tural purposes, and became a popular turf grass in many of the warmer regions of world, for its climatic adapta- A. P. Ramos e-mail: pramos@isa.ulisboa.pt tion and tolerance to different conditions, from full sun to moderate shade (Sauer 1972; Macfarlane and Shelton T. Valada : M. F. Caetano : A. P. Ramos 1986; Cherry 2001; Aldous et al. 2014; OGTR 2018). In LPVVA, Laboratório de Patologia Vegetal “Veríssimo de Portugal, besides being commonly used in public and Almeida”, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal private lawns, mainly in central and south regions, S. secundatum is occasionally found as a sub- spontaneous plant in humid or salty places (Franco and T. Valada Afonso 1998). e-mail: tvalada@isa.ulisboa.pt M. F. Caetano When properly planted and maintained, a healthy and e-mail: mffcaetano@isa.ulisboa.pt vigorous lawn of St. Augustinegrass produces a dense carpet of textured grass blades and has a high capacity to J. C. Franco CEF, Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of adapt to the soil and local environmental conditions, Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal supporting small populations of insect pests, such as e-mail: jsantossilva@isa.ulisboa.pt weevils, web worms, army worms, cut worms, or
540 Phytoparasitica (2021) 49:539–545 nematodes. However, chinch bugs (Hemiptera, long and 1.0 mm wide, with a ratio of length/width Heteroptera, Blissidae) can cause significant damage between 2.8 and 3.1 (Leonard 1966). The antennae are to St. Augustinegrass lawns in many regions (Kerr long and slender, consisting of four segments. Females 1966; Sweet 2000). Chinch bugs are sap-sucking spe- are slightly longer and larger than males and have an cies of the genus Blissus Burmeister that feed on phloem obvious slit on the rounded abdomen, where the ovipos- tissues above and below the soil surface, causing grad- itor rests instead an oval plate as in males. The head is ual yellowing and eventual dead patches of turf usually narrower than the posterior margin of the (Leonard 1966). These insects seem to prefer open pronotum. They are fuscous to black in colour with sunny areas, especially those with abundant thatch black and white wings, antennae variously infuscate, (Vázquez and Buss 2006; Reinert et al. 2011). legs reddish-yellow, often with a dark burnt orange tint. According to Dellapé and Thomas (2021), the genus The body is setose with somewhat recurved shorter Blissus currently consists of more than 30 species, most of setae and often less dense long erect setae. Wing dimor- which occur in North, Central or South America, with a phism occurs within the genus, so populations can con- few species known from the Palaearctic region, including sist of long-winged forms (macropterous), in which the some host-specific of economically important grasses. In wings reach almost the end of the abdomen, and short- North America, the most important species are winged forms (brachypterous), where the wings extend B. leucopterus leucopterus (Say), B. leucopterus hirtus for less than half the length of the abdomen, or both. Montandon, B. insularis Barber and B. occiduus Barber, They have a long rostrum with four segments and the tip which may have overlapping ranges of plant hosts and reaches at least the level of mesocoxae (Leonard 1966; geographic distribution (Anderson et al. 2006; Leonard Slater 1979; Schuh and Weirauch 2020). 1966; Tashiro 1987; Vittum et al. 1999). These chinch The taxonomic identification of lawn chinch bug is bugs are closely related and considered pests of turfgrass, based on the adults’ body size, pubescence, general col- but with different host preferences. While B. leucopterus our patterns, the colour of the posterior and anterior lobe leucopterus and B. leucopterus hirtus are important pests of the pronotum, mouthpart morphology (total length and of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Persoon), fescue length of individual segments), complemented, in some (Festuca spp.), Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), cases, with host range and geographic distribution perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and zoysiagrass (Leonard 1966, 1970; Slater and China 1961; Slater and (Zoysia japonica Steudel.), creeping bentgrass (Agrostis Baranowski 1990; Hoffman 1996; Sweet 2000; stolonifera L.) (in this last case, only for B. leucopterus Anderson et al. 2006; Larson and Scudder 2018). hirtus), B. occiduus is a pest only of buffalograss In October 2019, the Laboratório de Patologia Veg- (Bouteloua dactyloides (Nutt.) Columbus). Blissus etal “Veríssimo de Almeida” (LPVVA), School of Ag- insularis feeds on Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum riculture, University of Lisbon, was asked to investigate Flugge), Bermudagrass, centipedegrass (Eremochloa a new phytosanitary problem in St. Augustinegrass ophiuroides (Munro) Hack.) and zoysiagrass, and is the lawns, at Seixal in Setubal district. Samplings in the only Blissus species reported as a common pest of St. affected areas (Fig. 1) showed the damaged lawns were Augustinegrass (Tashiro 1987; Reinert et al. 1995; associated with large numbers of chinch bugs that were Chandra et al. 2011; Eickhoff et al. 2004). identified as B. insularis. Here we report for the first Blissus insularis is considered the most damaging time the presence of this chinch bug in Portugal and pest of St. Augustinegrass (Cherry 2001), being able to present the results of a survey carried out in Lisbon and build up very large populations, with more than 2000 Setubal districts, to assess its distribution in the region. insects/0.1 m2 (Reinert and Kerr 1973). Nymphs and adults of B. insularis are phloem feeders on S. secundatum causing wilting, chlorosis, stunting and Materials and methods death of damaged plants. At the beginning of the attacks, damage is limited to small patches of dead grass, and Sampling eventually expands, with entire lawns killed as time progresses (Vázquez and Buss 2006; Reinert et al. 2011). Samples were collected, between October 2019 and Adult members of the genus Blissus are small and October 2020, in different locations of Lisbon and somewhat elongated insects, measuring 2.0 to 4.0 mm Setubal districts: Seixal (38°37′33.0”N 9°06′58.9”W;
Phytoparasitica (2021) 49:539–545 541 October 2019), Oeiras (38°41′58.2”N 9°16′28.8”W; specimens collected at Almada, using the DNeasy Blood 38°41′38.3”N 9°18′01.1”W; 38°41′13.4”N 9°18′56.3”W; and Tissue® kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The pro- November 2019 and July 2020), Almada (38°40′03.2”N tocol provided by the manufacturer was followed, with the 9°14′25.0”W; November 2019), Cascais (38°41′50.7”N following modifications: initial sample washed with ultra- 9°26′28.4”W; June 2020), Tapada da Ajuda (38°42′ pure sterilized water, followed by instant freeze in liquid 27.5”N 9°10′56.3”W; June 2020), Sesimbra (38°26′ nitrogen to improve cell lysis and addition of 4 μL of 41.7”N 9°06′10.1”W; July 2020), Loures (38°49′53.8”N RNase A after the incubation period (approx. 1 h at 9°10′16.9”W; September 2020) and Grândola (38°27′ 56 °C). Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was conducted 26.9”N 8°51′43.3”W; October 2020). using the primers LCO1490 5’-GGTCAACAAATCAT Adults and nymphs of chinch bugs (Fig. 2a and Fig. AAAGATATTGG-3′ and HCO2198 5’-TAAACTTC 2b) were collected on damaged lawns of St. AGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′ (Folmer et al. 1994)‚ Augustinegrass, placing a 4–6 cm × 4–6 cm square of which extracted a fragment of 658 bp of the COI region. lawn in a bucket full of water and waiting for them to Each 25 μL PCR reaction tube contained 12.5 μL of float to the top (Shetlar and Andon 2012). The collected DreamTaq™ MasterMix (2x) solution (Thermo Fisher specimens were preserved in ethanol 70% for morpho- Scientific, Lithuania), 9.5 μL of ultra-pure sterilized water, logical and molecular studies. Voucher’s specimens 1 μL of each specific primer (each with a concentration of were deposited in the collection of LPVVA. 10 μM) and 1 μL of DNA (approx. 5 ng). The PCR cycle program was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for Morphological studies two minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for half a minute, annealing at 46 °C for a minute, For species identification, four adult females and four extension at 72 °C for one minute and a final extension at adult males (macropterous form), from each of the 10 75 °C for five minutes. PCR cycles were conducted on a studied locations (i.e., 80 insects), were studied under S1000 Bio-Rad Thermal Cycler. Quality of the PCR stereomicroscope (Leica MZ 12.5), and their images reactions was verified on an agarose gel (0.5X TBE). were captured at magnifications from ×20 to ×62.5 with DNA sequences were obtained through Sanger sequenc- a camera mounted in a system with motorized z-axis ing protocol. Amplification of COI fragments was made drive and inbuilt montaging software (Leica MC 170 on an ABI 3730 XL sequencer at Stabvida (http://www. HD). For each studied specimen, the general colour stabvida.com). Each sequence was blasted against the pattern and the colour of the posterior and anterior lobe sequences of Blissus species available in GenBank of the pronotum were registered. The body length (from (www.blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) for a species match. the tip of the clypeus to the posterior-most part of the body), body width (maximum width across humeral angles in dorsal view and maximum width of body in Results and discussion ventral view at right angles to the body length) and rostrum length were measured, using the software Leica Observed symptoms and damage Application Suite version 4.12.0. In addition, the rostral segments lengths of six females and six males were At all the sampled lawns, symptoms included stunting measured in wet mounted microscope slides under an (failure of leaf sheaths and internodes to elongate prop- optical microscope (Leica DM 2500) equipped with a erly), reddish to yellowish feeding marks behind leaf reticule eyepiece calibrated with a stage micrometer. sheaths and a yellowish streaking on the leaves. Sunny The identification of the studied specimens was areas were often most heavily infested. Severely dam- based on Slater and Baranowski (1990) and Anderson aged plants died or were badly stunted, with leaves at et al. (2006). the growing point wilted or dead (Fig. 1). Molecular studies Morphological studies For the amplification of the mitochondrial Cytochrome C The collected adults of chinch bugs consisted of both Oxidase subunit I gene (COI) total DNA was extracted macropterous and brachypterous forms (Fig. 2a). They from legs of two specimens collected at Seixal and two are grey to black and hirsute, with the body covered with
542 Phytoparasitica (2021) 49:539–545 Fig. 1 Damage caused by Blissus insularis on a St. Augustinegrass lawn: left - infested lawn displaying discolored patches, which are usually circular in shape; right - detail of the initial stage of a discolored patch of lawn fine silver-grey semi-erect hairs. The pronotum posteri- respectively. The abdomen of females was slightly longer or lobe is black, strongly contrasting with the grey and larger than that of males, with the resting ovipositor colour of the anterior lobe (Fig. 2c). In the macropterous instead an oval plate as in males (Fig. 2e). Adult females adults, the wings are white, with a distinctive triangular- were 0.98 to 1.16 mm (1.05 ± 0.06 mm) wide, whereas shaped black marking in the middle of the outer edge of adult males were narrower, ranging from 0.80 to 0.99 mm each wing (Fig. 2d). (0.92 ± 0.04 mm). The maximum width across humeral In the macropterous specimens, the adult female and angles in dorsal view ranged between 1.07 and 1.19 mm male lengths ranged from 3.03 to 3.78 mm (3.57 ± (1.11 ± 0.4 mm), in females and between 0.95 and 0.14 mm) and from 2.84 to 3.50 mm (3.19 ± 0.13 mm), 1.01 mm (1.00 ± 0.2 mm), in males. Fig. 2 Morphology of Blissus insularis: a) macropterous and pronotum (dorsal view); d) forewing hemelytron and membranous brachypterous adults (dorsal view); b) 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th hindwing (dorsal view); e) abdomen (ventral view; left: female, instar-nymph (dorsal view); c) anterior and posterior lobe of the right: male); f) rostrum (ventral view). Scale bar: 0.25 mm
Phytoparasitica (2021) 49:539–545 543 The rostrum extends at least below the attachment and Baranowski 1990; Anderson et al. 2006). The re- point of the third pair of legs and sometimes the tip sults of the molecular studies confirmed they belong to reaches the abdomen (Fig. 2f). Overall, rostrum length the genus Blissus, but did not allow the identification at was higher in adult females, than in males. The rostrum the species level. In fact, previous analysis of the COI length measured between 1.44 and 1.77 mm (1.62 ± gene of heteropteran species by several authors (Jung 0.07 mm), in females and between 1.41 and 1.71 mm et al. 2011; Raupach et al. 2014; Kim and Jung 2018) (1.50 ± 0.06 mm), in males. The mean length of the four revealed that the mean maximum intraspecific distance individual rostrum segments differed between genders: of the compared species was around 1.8%, while the 409.7 μm and 370.5 μm (segment 1); 525.2 μm and average minimum interspecific distance of congeners 478.2 μm (segment 2); 351.4 μm and 329.3 μm (seg- was 3.5%. According to Park et al. (2011), these values ment 3); and 377.5 μm and 349.3 μm (segment 4), for are congruent with the enormous diversity of this taxon, females and males, respectively. where there are countless species ordinarily morpholog- ically similar and closely related. Molecular studies The extensive damage observed in St. Augustinegrass lawns supports our identification since, as mentioned The 633-bp sequences derived from three of the studied earlier B. insularis is the only Blissus species known as individuals (Almada sample) were 100% identical to a common pest of St. Augustinegrass. each other (GenBank accession MW435183), whereas the sequence of the other one (Seixal sample) had Concluding remarks 99.69% similarity to the others, with two single- nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (GenBank accession The presence of B. insularis was confirmed in all 10 MW435184). Based on a megablast search of NCBI sampled locations, which indicates that this alien chinch GenBank nucleotide database, the closest hits using bug has already established and dispersed within an area both COI sequences had highest similarity to an uniden- whose limits are 13 Km North, 26 Km West and 38 Km tified species of Blissus (GenBank HQ929023.1; Iden- Southeast from Lisbon. Eight of the sampled locations tities = 603/606 (99.50%), 0 gaps) followed by are up to 26 Km from Lisbon, whereas the other two B. leucopterus (GenBank KR040493.1; Identities = locations are up to 21 Km from Setubal. Both Lisbon 605/609 (99.34%), 0 gaps), B. arenarius (GenBank and Setubal have international ports, and Lisbon has an KR038680.1; Identities = 604/609 (99.18%), 0 gaps), international airport. The importation of contaminated B. occiduus (GenBank KR043512.1; Identities = 598/ plants was the possible pathway of invasion. This is the 609 (98.19%), 0 gaps) and Blissus canadensis most important pathway of alien Heteroptera in Europe (GenBank KR043528.1; Identities = 562/608 (Rabitsch 2008). (92.43%), 0 gaps). In contrast, the two COI sequences According to Rabitsch (2008, 2010), at least 16 of B. insularis available at the GenBank (KU242610.1 Heteroptera species are alien to Europe, of which about and KU242609.1), referred in studies of culturing and 63% are of North America origin. No Blissus species is characterization of the gut symbiont Burkholderia in included in that list. To the best of our knowledge, the this bug species, showed a very high level of divergence documented presence of B. insularis in Portugal corre- with the sequences of the studied specimens (GenBank sponds to the first report of this species both in Europe KU242610.1; Identities = 337/673 (50.07%), 167 gaps), and in the Palaearctic region. The severe damages as well as with any of the listed sequences of caused by this chinch bug in different locations of B. leucopterus (e. g. GenBank KU242610.1 vs Lisbon and Setubal districts demand further studies on KR040493.1; Identities = 334/679 (49.63%), 178 gaps), its bionomics and the development of effective pest B. arenarius, B. occiduus or B. canadensis. management strategies. Pest management of B. insularis populations has Taxonomic identification been mostly based on the application of insecticides and use of resistant cultivars of St. Augustinegrass, such The morphological characteristics of the studied speci- as ‘Floratam’, ‘Floralawn’, ‘FX-10’ and ‘Captiva’. mens of the lawn chinch bug collected in Portugal are in However, the existence of resistant populations of the accordance with those described for B. insularis (Slater chinch bug has been reported (Genovesi et al. 2009;
544 Phytoparasitica (2021) 49:539–545 Reinert et al. 2011; Vázquez et al. 2011; Milla-Lewis (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 97, 67–73. et al. 2017). Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R., & Vrijenhoek, R. (1994). DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial Acknowledgments Thanks are due to Bruno Ferreira, Filipa cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan in- Maia and Marta Rocha for their help in the field collection of lawn vertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, samples. We would like also to acknowledge the two anonymous 3(5), 294–299. reviewers, for their comments and suggestions, which helped us Franco, J.A. & Afonso, M.R. (1998). Nova Flora de Portugal improving an earlier version of the manuscript. LEAF-Linking (Continente e Açores), vol. III (fascículo II), Gramineae. Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, and CEF-Forest Lisboa: Escolar Editora. Research Centre are two research units funded by Fundação para a Genovesi, A. D., Jessup, R. W., Engelke, M. C., & Burson, B. L. Ciência e a Tecnologia I.P. (FCT), Portugal (UID/AGR/04129/ (2009). Interploid St. Augustinegrass [Stenotaphrum 2020 and UIDB/00239/2020, respectively). secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze] hybrids recovered by embryo rescue. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, Author’s contributions Conceptualization, A.L., A.P.R. and 45, 659–666. M.F.C.; methodology, A.L. and T.V.; formal analysis, A.L., Hoffman, R.L. (1996). Seed bugs of Virginia (Heteroptera: A.P.R., M.F.C. and T.V.; resources, A.L., A.P.R. and M.F.C.; Lygaeidae). The insects of Virginia, no. 14. Martinsville: writing—original draft preparation, A.L., A.P.R. and M.F.C.; Virginia Museum of Natural History. writing—review and editing, A.L., A.P.R., M.F.C., J.C.F. and Jung, S., Duwal, R. K., & Lee, S. (2011). COI barcoding of true T.V. bugs (Insecta. Heteroptera). Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 266–270. Funding The project was funded by Laboratório de Patologia Kerr, S. H. (1966). Biology of the chinch bug Blissus insularis Vegetal “Veríssimo de Almeida”, School of Agriculture, Univer- (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Florida Entomologist, 49, 9–18. sity of Lisbon. Kim, J., & Jung, S. (2018). COI barcoding of plant bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Miridae). PeerJ, 6, e6070. Declarations Larson, D. J., & Scudder, G. G. (2018). Seed bugs and their allies (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Lygaeoidea) of the Canadian prai- Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no con- rie provinces. Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification, flict of interest. 34, 1–174. Leonard, D. E. (1966). Biosystematics of the “leucopterus com- plex” of the genus Blissus (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Bulletin of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 677, 1– 47. Leonard, D. E. (1970). A new north American species of Blissus References (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 102, 1531–1533. Aldous, D.E., Hunter, A. Martin, P.M., Panayiotis, N.A. & Macfarlane, D. & Shelton, M. (1986). Pastures in Vanuatu. ACIAR McAuliffe, K.W. (2014). Management of Sports Turf and Technical Reports Series, N° 2. Canberra, Australia: Amenity Grasslands. In G.R. Dixon and D.E. Aldous (Eds.), Australian Centre for International Agriculture Research. Horticulture: Plants for People and Places, volume 2 (pp. Milla-Lewis, S. R., Katharine, M. Y., Arrellano, C., & Cardoza, Y. 731–761). Netherlands: Springer. J. (2017). Tolerance in St. Augustinegrass Germplasm Anderson, W.G., Heng-moss, T., Baxendale, F.P., Baird, M., against Blissus insularis barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae). Sarath, G. & Higley, L. (2006). Chinch bug (Hemiptera: Crop Science, 57, S-26–S-36. Blissidae) mouthpart morphology. Probing Frequencies and OGTR - Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (2018). The Locations on Resistant and Susceptible Germplasm. biology of Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walter) Kuntze (buf- Resource document Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL falo grass). Version 1. Office of the Gene Technology Faculty, 38. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/38. Regulator, Department of Health, Government of Australia. Accessed 20 October 2020. http://www.ogtr.gov.au/. Accessed 20 October 2020. Chandra, A., Reinert, J. A., LaMantia, J., Pond, J. B., & Huff, D. Park, D. S., Foottit, R., Maw, E., & Hebert, P. D. (2011). R. (2011). Genetic variability in populations of the southern Barcoding bugs: DNA-based identification of the true bugs chinch bug, Blissus insularis, assessed using AFLP analysis. (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera). PLoS One, 6(4), e18749. Journal of Insect Science, 11(173), 1–10. Rabitsch, W. (2008). Alien true bugs of Europe (Insecta: Cherry, R. (2001). Seasonal wing polymorphism in southern Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Zootaxa, 1827, 1–44. chinch bugs (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Florida Entomologist, Rabitsch, W. (2010). True bugs (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). 84, 737–739. Chapter 9.1. BioRisk, 4, 407–433. Dellapé, P.M. & Thomas, J.H. (2021). Lygaeoidea species file. Raupach, M. J., Hendrich, L., Küchler, S. M., Deister, F., Version 5.0/5.0. http://Lygaeoidea.SpeciesFile.org. Accessed Morinière, J., & Gossner, M. M. (2014). Building-up of a 12 February 2021. DNA barcode library for true bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Eickhoff, T., Baxendale, F., Heng-Moss, T., & Blankenship, E. Heteroptera) of Germany reveals taxonomic uncertainties (2004). Turfgrass, crop and weed hosts of Blissus occiduus and surprises. PLoS One, 9(9), e106940.
Phytoparasitica (2021) 49:539–545 545 Reinert, J. A., Chandra, A., & Engelke, M. C. (2011). under the plenary powers. Z. N. (S.) 1471. The Bulletin of Susceptibility of genera and cultivars of turfgrass to southern Zoological Nomenclature, 18, 346–348. chinch bug Blissus insularis (Hemiptera: Blissidae). Florida Slater, J.A. & Baranowski, R.M. (1990). The Lygaeidae of Florida Entomologist, 94, 158–163. (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Arthropods of Florida and neigh- Reinert, J. A., Heller, P. R., & Crocker, R. L. (1995). Pest infor- boring land areas. Vol. 14. Gainesville: Florida Dept. mation. Chinch bugs. In R. L. Brandenburg & M. G. Villani Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant (Eds.), Handbook of Turfgrass insect pests (pp. 38–42). Industry. Lanham: Entomological Society of America. Sweet, M. H. (2000). Seed and chinch bug (Lygaeoidae). In C. W. Reinert, J. A., & Kerr, S. H. (1973). Bionomics and control of Schaefer & A. R. Paninzzi (Eds.), Heteroptera of economic lawn chinch bug. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of importance (pp. 143–264). Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC. America, 19, 91–92. Tashiro, H. (1987). Turfgrass insects of the United States and Sauer, J. D. (1972). Revision of Stenotaphrum (Gramineae: Canada. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Paniceae) with attention to its historical geography. Vázquez, J. C., & Buss, E. A. (2006). Southern chinch bug feeding Brittonia, 24, 202–222. impact on St. Augustinegrass growth under different irriga- Schuh, R. T., & Weirauch, C. (2020). True bugs of the world tion regimes. Applied Turfgrass Science, 3, 1–5. (Hemiptera: Heteroptera): Classification and natural histo- Vázquez, C., Royalty, R. N., & Buss, E. A. (2011). Susceptibility ry. Manchester: Siri Scientific Press. of Blissus insularis (Heteroptera: Hemiptera: Blissidae) pop- Shetlar, D.J. & Andon, J. (2012). Chinch Bugs in Turf Grass. The ulations in Florida to bifenthrin and permethrin. Florida Ohio State University Extension, January. https://ohioline. Entomologist, 94, 571–581. osu.edu/factsheet/HYG-2503-11. Accessed 20 October 2020. Vittum, P. J., Villani, M. G., & Tashiro, H. (1999). Turfgrass Slater, J. A. (1979). The systematics, phylogeny, and zoogeogra- insects of the United States and Canada. Ithaca: Cornell phy of the Blissinae of the world (Hemiptera, Lygaeidae). University Press. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 165, 1– 180. Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to Slater, J. A., & China, W. E. (1961). Blissus Burmeister, 1835 jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional (Insecta, Hemiptera): Proposed designation of a type species affiliations.
You can also read