FASTRACK TO SHAREPOINT - A VISION FOR USING SHAREPOINT AND DOCUMENTUM
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
A little bit about RTD • Mission Statement – To • At RTD we: meet our constituents’ • Serve 8 counties • Governed by a 15 member, publicly present and future elected Board of Directors public transit needs by • Cover 2,337 square miles offering safe, clean, • Employ 2,500+ people • Have over 300,000+ boardings a day reliable, li bl courteous, t on over 170 lines accessible and cost‐ • Service by RTD and contracted out effective service • Salaried and union employees p y throughout the District.
A Little More…. • Organizational Structure • Records Management – General Manager falls under IT – 9 Departments with Department within Assistant GM’s Administration overseeing them • Fall under the Colorado – New GM has reorganized State Archivist for the departments and filled the “Acting” roles direction and guidance on our program
Where we are now • We had a retention • We are bound to local, schedule, last updated in state and federal 2002 – department regulations based. Revised and • IGA’s and ggrant approved d last l fall f ll requirements • Legal had been working • No formal records on revisingg to match the training done, ever Colorado Special Districts • Strong support from legal schedules and Senior Leadership • Records warehouse team team. closed at one point by the • A little bit of records fire marshal NIMBY
Where we are now • A lot,, a lot of change g • The ggood news is the – New ERP system managers and – New Accounting system employees at RTD want – Retirements/leaving / of to do the right thing thing. key personnel • We have a formal – Recession and fundingg records repository – it issues looks like this…. • From one senior manager “We’re going manager: through technological burnout.”
Our Current Repository
Our Current Repository • Basically used as • Some departments use another shared drive it very effectively • Implementation p done • Some,, not so much well, went through • Poor & inconsistent several managers with metadata (if any)y different views on • Non‐record material in permissions, settings, the repository use • Crazy level file structures
Getting It Fixed • Gettingg buy‐in y from Senior Leadership p • Retention Schedule updated and approved • Developing Records Procedures • Developing Relationships • Still to do… – Develop Training – Strategic and Technical – Records Inventory – As we meet with departments, adjust j the retention schedule – Document and automate workflows – Implement New Repository – The Right Way!
We’ve We ve got to be flexible
ECM – The Grand Vision • Everybody working in one unified system (in theory) • One source for records and information (more theory)y) • Applications sitting on top of Documentum or pullingg information from it (better theory) p y • All of this is great in theory, difficult in application – Home grown “quick fix databases” hard to get rid of – Integration is very difficult – Underestimated resources needed
RTD Base Accounts Engineering Operations Payable McLaren SharePoint 2010 Oracle Enterprise Engineer ERM Transmittal Collaboration Solicitations Contract & Submittals Drawings Portal Administration Portal Search and Retrieval Workflow Engineering Change Claims Invoices Documents Orders Shared Drive Replacement Tribal Knowledge Workflow Workflow SaaS Applications Oracle Law Construction DBE/SBE Repository Enforcement ‐ Management ‐ Management ‐ TBD Aconex TBD Records Documentum Management Content Server WebTop Archive Services for Email / Records Retention Manager ECIS Email Legal Store Laserfiche Federated search
Why SharePoint and Documentum • Time, effort and money spent on developing Documentum • Replacement for eRoom • Cost C t effective ff ti solution l ti • Is SharePoint robust enough on it’s own? • Lots off opportunities ffor enhancements h • Shared drive replacement
Why SharePoint and Documentum • Integration with Office 2010 (and Communicator?) • Consistent i interface i f • Begin developing social media aspects • Tagging • Blogs • Wikis • Skillset knowledge • Search and retrieve across multiple repositories • Workflow and repository replacement for Outlook
Why SharePoint and Documentum • Minimize the need for “new programs/software” • Empower iinformation f i workers k ((within i hi some boundaries) • Free F up IT tto workk on other th projects j t
Where do we go from here? • Think long term – strategic management of our information assets • Development of governance policies for SharePoint • Get G t peoplel to t understand d t d th the reality lit off what h t th they are asking for and what it means to them • Expect to need consultant help to set up • Expect to need additional software tools • Expect E t resistance it tto change h – “We’ve “W ’ never done d it that way before…”
Where do we go from here? • Train Train Train – Individuals, groups, management, staff consistently and regularly staff, • Create and d understand d d workflows, kfl questioning everything
Cool Stuff/Competing Projects • CAD/AVL System • Smart Cards • PIDS Displays • Farebox Upgrades • Transit Signal Priority • SaaS Initiatives – Construction Management – Law Enforcement – SBE/DBE / Trackingg
What do I (You) need to do to keep up? • Professional training • Know your industry • Network with your peers – Twitter – Linked In – Facebook??? • Follow blogs – professional and industry
Questions? • Thank a You, ou, Thank a you very e y much… uc Brian Starck,, CRM bkstarck@gmail.com Cell: 720.253.3662 Work: 303.299.2177 Twitter: @bkstarck Linked In: linkedin.com.in/brianstarck
You can also read