Endo- and Exo-Inulinases: Enzyme-Substrate Interaction and Rational Immobilization
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Endo- and Exo-Inulinases: Enzyme-Substrate Interaction and Rational Immobilization Alessandra Basso and Patrizia Spizzo Laboratory of Applied and Computational Biocatalysis, Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, Trieste 1-34127, Italy SPRIN s.r.l., c/o Università degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, Trieste 1-34127, Italy Valerio Ferrario Laboratory of Applied and Computational Biocatalysis, Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, Trieste 1-34127, Italy Lorena Knapic Laboratory of Applied and Computational Biocatalysis, Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, Trieste 1-34127, Italy SPRIN s.r.l., c/o Università degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, Trieste 1-34127, Italy Nina Savko Laboratory of Applied and Computational Biocatalysis, Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, Trieste 1-34127, Italy Paolo Braiuca Laboratory of Applied and Computational Biocatalysis, Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, Trieste 1-34127, Italy SPRIN s.r.l., c/o Università degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, Trieste 1-34127, Italy Cynthia Ebert Laboratory of Applied and Computational Biocatalysis, Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, Trieste 1-34127, Italy Emanuele Ricca and Vincenza Calabrò Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica e dei Materiali, Università della Calabria, via P. Bucci, Edificio Cubo 44A, Arcavacata di Rende 87036, Italy Lucia Gardossi Laboratory of Applied and Computational Biocatalysis, Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, Trieste 1-34127, Italy DOI 10.1002/btpr.334 Published online November 25, 2009 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). Three-dimensional models of exoinulinase from Bacillus stearothermophilus and endoinulinase from Aspergillus niger were built up by means of homology modeling. The crystal structure of exoi- nulinase from Aspergillus awamori was used as a template, which is the sole structure of inulinase resolved so far. Docking and molecular dynamics simulations were performed to investigate the dif- ferences between the two inulinases in terms of substrate selectivity. The analysis of the structural differences between the two inulinases provided the basis for the explanation of their different regio-selectivity and for the understanding of enzyme-substrate interactions. Surface analysis was performed to point out structural features that can affect the efficiency of enzymes also after immo- bilization. The computational analysis of the three-dimensional models proved to be an effective tool for acquiring information and allowed to formulate an optimal immobilized biocatalyst even more active that the native one, thus enabling the full exploitation of the catalytic potential of these enzymes. V C 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 26: 397–405, 2010. Keywords: Endo-inulinase, exo-inulinase, inulin, molecular modeling, docking, homology modeling, immobilization Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to L. Gardossi at gardossi@units.it. C 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers V 397
398 Biotechnol. Prog., 2010, Vol. 26, No. 2 Introduction Microbial inulinases belong to an important class of indus- trial enzymes that have gained increasing attention in the recent years. Inulinases can be produced by a series of microorganisms, including fungi, yeasts, and bacteria.1 Inulinases are hydrolytic enzymes able to hydrolyse inulin, a natural storage polymer found widely in plants such as chicory, artichoke and banana. Inulin is a polydisperse fruc- tan with the degree of polymerization that typically ranges from 2 to 60, but may be higher. The fructosyl units in inu- lin are linked by b (2,1) linkages and the resulting polymer chain terminates with a glucose residue. Inulin is used as an indigestible soluble dietary fiber and thickener in foods; it is a potential source of fructose. Fructose is significantly sweeter than the table sugar sucrose and glucose,2 it is not associated with obesity, caries, atherosclerosis and diabetes.3 There are two different subclasses of inulinase,4 endo- and exo-inulinase: exoinulinase (EC 3.2.1.80) hydrolyses the ter- minal fructose from the inulin chain, whereas endoinulinase (EC 3.2.1.7) reduces the long chain of inulin into smaller ol- igosaccharides, which are similar to fructooligosaccharides.5 In the present study we have investigated the inulinases pres- ent in the commercial preparation Fructozyme L from Novo- zymes, which is a mixture of 10% of endoinulinase from Aspergillus niger and 90% of exoinulinase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. The three dimensional models of the Figure 1. Superimposition of the structural models of A. awa- two enzymes were constructed by homology modeling, using mori exoinulinase (black backbone) from PDB the structure of the exoinulinase from Aspergillus awamori (1Y4W) and the two generated structures: exoinuli- as a template.6 The models allowed to draw the picture of nase from B. stearothermophilus (main differences in dotted gray) and endoinulinase from A. niger (main how the two enzymes recognize inulin and to explain their differences in gray). inherent different regio-selectivity. Finally, superficial fea- The Glu residue of A. niger endoinulinase, responsible for the tures of the proteins were also studied by using different nucleophilic attack, is represented in gray CPK mode. B. stear- computational methods and the commercial enzymatic prepa- otermophilus exoinulinase and A. niger endoinulinase are ho- mologous with A. awamori exoinulinase for 37% and 34% ration was experimentally tested after immobilization on two respectively on the basis of their primary structure. different supports and under various conditions. Results and Discussion Starting from the sequences of exoinulinase from B. stear- Construction of the three-dimensional models othermophilus and endoinulinase from A. niger, published on Commercial preparation of Fructozyme L from Novo- UniProtKB,8 their three-dimensional structures were gener- zymes is a mixture of 10% of endoinulinase from Aspergil- ated by homology modeling. Bacillus stearotermophilus lus niger (EC 3.2.1.7) and 90% of exoinulinase from exoinulinase is 37% homologous with Aspergillus awamori Bacillus stearothermophilus (EC 3.2.1.80). The study of the exoinulinase and 34% homologous with Aspergillus niger three-dimensional structures of these two enzymes was per- endoinulinase on the basis of their primary structure. formed with two principal objectives: firstly to understand As mentioned earlier, exoinulinase structure from A. awa- the different selectivities of these two enzymes; secondly to mori (PDB ID:1Y4W) was used as the template structure acquire information on the structural features of the surface and the generated models were analyzed with Ramachandran of the two proteins which might be crucial for developing map and compared by consensus analysis (see ‘‘Experimental efficient optimization protocols. section’’ for details); as Bacillus stearotermophilus exoinuli- The crystal structures of Aspergillus niger endoinulinase nase is concerned 85.13% of the residues are in the core and Bacillus stearothermophilus exoinulinase are not avail- region of the Ramachandran map, this percentage is 86.61% able in PDB (Protein Data Bank)7 so that the structure of for the model of A. niger endoinulinase, while all the other these two enzymes had to be calculated by homology model- residues lie inside the allowed region of the map. Bond ing. For this purpose, the structure with the PDB code lengths, angles and dihedral were within acceptable parame- 1Y4W of exoinulinase from Aspergillus awamori was used ter ranges, after models refinement and no atom clashes as template for the calculation of both models. As a matter could be found. of fact, three different structures of exoinulinase from This high score of Ramachandran maps indicate the qual- Aspergillus awamori are the sole 3-D structures of inulinases ity of the generated structures (see Supporting Information). available in PDB and 1Y4W has the highest resolution It must be underlined that the comparison of the structures (1.55 Å). A second structure, 1Y9M, having a lower resolu- of all the three inulinases (A. awamori exoinulinase, B. tion (1.89 Å) was used as a reference model for all the sub- stearothermophilus exoinulinase and A. niger endoinulinase) sequent docking studies because of the presence of a shows a high degree of similarity in the structural domain fructose molecule co-crystallized in the active site.6 opposite to the active site region, as reported in Figure 1.
Biotechnol. Prog., 2010, Vol. 26, No. 2 399 Figure 2. Exoinulinase from B. stearothermophilus: the active site is highlighted in surface mode and the 1-kestose is docked inside. Figure 3. Endoinulinase from A. niger with the funnel domain highlighted in surface mode with a six unit fructose polymer docked inside. As expected, the main differences among the structures were found in the catalytic site of the enzymes. The two exoinulinases share common structural features, presenting Asp residue (Asp24 in the B. stearothermophilus enzyme, Asp41 in the A. awamori one) that is supposed to be respon- sible of the nucleophilic attack.6 In the active site of the endoinulinase the Asp is replaced by a Glu 43 residue. Because of the large size of the natural substrates, the cat- alytic site of the endoinulinase is quite wide and accounts about 90 of the 516 residues. On the contrary, the active site of the exoinulinase, which acts on the terminal residue of the polymer, is smaller and it includes 42 of the 493 total aminoacids. An interesting common feature among the three structures is the presence of the Arg-Asp-Pro motif (RDP), a sequence that is preserved also in other classes of enzymes like fructo- syl-transferases or invertases. The presence of this motif is supposed to be important for the recognition of the pyranosi- dic ring and it has been reported to be responsible for the enzyme specificity towards fructopyranosidic residues.6 Enzyme-inulin interaction: docking and molecular dynamics simulations Molecular docking9 and molecular dynamics10 were applied to the study of the interactions between inulin and the active site of the two inulinases. The different structural organization of the active sites of these two enzymes appears evident by comparing the two Figure 4. The exoinulinase from B. stearothermophilus: (a) dis- homology models and it offers the basis for the explanation tance of the anomeric carbon of the 1-kestose from of their different regio-selectivity. The exoinulinase displays Asp24 during the dynamics trajectory and (b) dis- a hole-shaped binding pocket with the RDP motif located at tance of the glycosidic oxygen of the 1-kestose and the stabilizing Glu203 during the dynamics trajectory. the bottom, whereas the endoinulinase presents a funnel- shaped active site, with the RDP motif in the middle. This causes a deep static and dynamic difference in the interac- molecule present in the active site of the 1Y9M PDB struc- tion with inulin, that translates into their different regio- ture were used as a reference for the scoring of the obtained selectivity. conformations. The selected conformation was chosen as the The enzyme-substrate interactions were studied by subject- initial state for subsequent molecular dynamics simulations ing the enzyme-substrate complexes to 2ns molecular dy- (see following section). namics simulations. In the case of the exoinulinase the The simulation of the endoinulinase was more complex, complex (Figure 2) was calculated by docking 1-kestose since there is no crystal structure available presenting a [composed by two fructose molecules linked via b(1,2)-gly- sugar molecule docked inside the active site. Therefore a cosidic bond]11 by means of a molecular simulation based fructose hexamer, composed by six fructose units linked via on AlphaPMI algorithm. The coordinates of the fructose b(1,2)-glycosidic bonds, was sketched and manually placed
400 Biotechnol. Prog., 2010, Vol. 26, No. 2 into the funnel shaped active site. The substrate conforma- The stabilization of the complex is significantly driven by tion was manually modified to improve the fitting with the the interaction between the glycosidic oxygen of the 1-kes- active site shape. The manually placed substrate was then tose and Glu203. The monitoring of this interaction during used as starting conformation for the docking simulation, the trajectory pointed out a dynamic switch between two similarly to what has been done in the case of exoinulinase. conformations, which correspond to a distance of 3.5 Å (sta- The conformation obtained from the docking procedure bilized conformation) and 5.5 Å (de-stabilized conformation) (Figure 3) was used as initial state of the molecular dynam- respectively (Figure 4b). This conformational switch is prob- ics simulation. ably crucial for the release of the product from the active site after the enzymatic catalysis and it also limits product inhibition effects. Molecular dynamics of the enzyme-substrates complexes The endoinulinase shows a significantly different dynamic The two enzyme-substrate complexes were used as start- behavior: although the thermodynamic equilibrium is ing conformations for 2 ns molecular dynamics simulations reached after a few ps, the enzyme toggles between two based on AMBER94 force field12 and implicit solvent states during the entire equilibrium phase of the dynamics. treatment. The first conformation of the funnel domain corresponds to The exoinulinase system reached the equilibrium after 500 the closed/inactive state whereas the second conformation picoseconds (ps) and remained stable during the rest of the corresponds to the open/active conformation (Figures 5 and molecular dynamics trajectory. As it can be seen in Figure 6). This conformational change is most probably related to 4a, there are two major different states of the system during the mechanism of substrate/product acceptance and release, the first 50 ps of the simulation. Initially the substrate reor- although it does not alter the interaction of the reactive part ients its position in the pocket by increasing the distance of the substrate with the active site. The stabilization of the between the anomeric carbon of the 1-kestose and the active glycosidic oxygen of the substrate by hydrogen bond forma- residue Asp24 (from 6 to 14Å). Afterwards, this distance is tion with Glu233 appears similar to the stabilization that progressively reduced and after 500 ps, the complex encoun- takes place in the exoinulinase, as it can be seen comparing ters a stabilization in the range of 4.5–6.5 Å (Figure 4a). distances variations during the dynamics (Figures 4b and 7). From the analysis of the RDP motif during the molecular dynamics trajectories, it appeared evident that, besides a sin- gle H-bond with the substrate, these three residues do not have a relevant direct role in the enzyme-substrate interac- tions either in the exo- and endoindulinase. Nevertheless, they establish a complex network of interactions with several other residues of the enzymes’ active site, playing a major role in maintaining its shape and therefore indirectly respon- sible of the chemo-selectivity of the enzyme (see Supporting Information Figure 4). Surface analysis A detailed GRID13 analysis of the surface of the enzymes was performed to map the distribution of the hydrophilic and Figure 5. The endoinulinase from A. niger: the opened and hydrophobic zones. The analysis showed a neat hydrophilic closed conformation of the funnel constituting the active site, measured as a function of the distance character in both enzymes surfaces, even if more marked in between a carbons of Trp67 and Glu173, two resi- endoinulinase from A. niger. This is in line with features dues on the opposite side of the funnel. already observed for other hydrolases acting in aqueous environments.14 Figure 6. A. niger endoinulinase: conformational change of the funnel domain in surface mode showing the closed active site, on the left, and the open conformation, on the right, with the substrate (fructose hexamer) docked inside, represented in a licorice mode.
Biotechnol. Prog., 2010, Vol. 26, No. 2 401 Looking into detail at the catalytic sites of both enzymes, immobilization processes. Twenty-six lysine residues were an increase of hydrophobicity can be noticed in the proxim- found to be on the surface of exoinulinase, none of them are ity of the entrance of the active sites, which might have the close to the active site. Eleven lysine residues can be found function to avoid an excessive stabilization of the enzyme- on the endoinulinase surface, only one being located near substrate complex and favor the release of the hydrolysis the active site (Figure 8). products (Figure 8). In the perspective of developing an immobilization proto- N-glycosylation sites were also investigated. N-Glycosyla- col, the enzymes seem to be optimal for the covalent attach tion of proteins takes place in the correspondence of the to functionalized polymeric carrier. None of the lysine resi- Asn-X-Ser/Thr sequence15 through the linking of the Asn to dues of both inulinases can significantly affect the access to two GlcNAc residues.16 the active site or the dynamic behavior of the structural The Fuzzpro algorithm of the EBI SRS set of bioinfor- motifs involved in the catalysis. matic tools17 was used to identify N-glycosylation sites. Therefore two methacrylic polymers carrying amino and Exoinulinase and endoinulinase present 4 and 5 potential epoxy functional groups have been chosen for covalent immobilization, namely SepabeadsV EC-HA and SepabeadsV R R sites of glycosylation respectively, as showed in Figure 9. All the resulting glycosylation sites are actually located on EC-EP. the protein surface. Their relative positions on the surface are very similar, also near the active sites. Immobilization The analysis of the surface was also extended to the superficial lysines, that can be potentially used in covalent The immobilization studies were performed using the commercial preparation of inulinases Fructozyme L from Novozymes. The commercial preparation was characterized, in terms of protein content and specific activity (release of fructose, see Experimental Section). Moreover, it was eval- uated that the enzymatic preparation loose 90% of activity after 1 h of incubation at 65 C. The use of the enzyme in productive industrial process is often limited by the low stability of the enzyme preparation and by the difficulty to recover and reuse the biocatalyst; a typical approach for improving both aspects is represented by immobilization, which can be performed according to various types of techniques with the concomitant advantages and disadvantages.18,19 In this study the enzymes were cova- lently immobilized on methacrylic supports, namely amino and epoxy Sepabeads (SepabeadsV EC-HA and SepabeadsV R R Figure 7. Endoinulinase from A. niger: distance of the glyco- EC-EP, produced by Resindion S.r.l., Mitsubishi Chem. sidic oxygen of the 1-kestose and the stabilizing Corp.), which are solid resin employed for enzyme immobi- Glu233 during the dynamics trajectory. lization on industrial scale. Figure 8. Grid profile of B. stereatermophilus exoinulinase (a) and A. niger endoinulinase (b): in crossed zones the hydrophobic areas of the enzyme surface and in light gray the hydrophilic areas of the enzyme surface. The active site area is highlighted in the circle.
402 Biotechnol. Prog., 2010, Vol. 26, No. 2 Figure 9. Exoinulinase from B. stearothermophilus (a) and endoinulinase from A. niger (b): the active site is represented in surface- transparent mode, the superficial lysines in space-filling mode and the glycosilation sites as big beads. Table 1. Properties of the Immobilized Preparations of Fructozyme Table 2. Characteristics of the Preparations on 100 g Scale of L on Sepabeads Immobilized Fructozyme L Bound Water Activity Bound Water Activity Support* Proteins† % Content %†,‡ U/gdry§ Support Proteins %* Content %† U/gdry‡ Sepabeads EC-EP 75 71 204 Sepabeads EC-EP 77 71 205 Sepabeads EC-HA 76 69 300 Sepabeads EC-HA 82 67 285 * Immobilization was carried out in KPi buffer (KH2PO4/K2HPO4 * Determined by Pierce method, using inulinase solution for calibra- buffer 1.25 M, pH 8.0; see Experimental Section), starting from 250U of tion curve.22 † enzyme per gram of dry support. The water content of preparation was evaluated by drying the sam- † Determined by Pierce method, using inulinase solution for calibra- ples at 110 C for 6h. tion curve.22 ‡ Hydrolytic activity measured by hydrolysis of inulin. ‡ The water content of preparations was evaluated by drying the sam- ples at 110 C for 6 h. § Hydrolytic activity measured as release of fructose from hydrolysis the bulky inulin towards the anchored enzymes (see Support- of inulin. ing Information). The excellent activity of the immobilized inulinases was also confirmed by reproducing the protocols on 100 g scale Immobilization on epoxy supports proceeds through direct (Table 2) and by assaying their efficiency in a 500 mL bio- nucleophilic attack of e-amino groups of lysines to the epoxy reactor (see Experimental Section). groups, whereas immobilization on amino supports requires The fructose production was monitored for the initial 30 a preactivation by glutaraldehyde.11,20,21 hours of the reactions (Figure 10). Using 1 gwet of both the Immobilizations were performed at pH 8.0 using in all the immobilized preparations (corresponding to 59U for the experiments 250 enzyme Units of native preparation per dry Sepabeads EC-EP preparation and 94U for Sepabeads EC- gram of immobilization polymer (Table 1) HA) in 24 h the fructose released is above the 90% (Sepa- As indicated by results in both cases the expressed activity beads EC-EP, gray empty squares) and 80% (Sepabeads EC- of the immobilized biocatalysts was very high and in the HA, gray empty circles) of the maximum theoretical amount case of Sepabeads EC-HA the immobilization efficiency is obtainable from the type of inulin employed in the even [100%. These data suggest that upon immobilization experiments. the enzymes assume optimal orientations and conformations, As shown in Figure 10, reaction rates with Sepabeads EC- which facilitate the inulin access to the active sites as well HA preparation was slightly faster (v0 ¼ 1.49 lmol U1 as the prompt release of the product into the bulk medium. min1, black circles) than with Sepabeads EC-EP (v0 ¼ 0.71 This is particularly important since in many cases the immo- lmol U1 min1, black squares). bilization causes a decrease of the activity of the enzyme due to unfavorable conformational distortions or occlusion of Conclusions the active sites.19 Moreover, diffusion limitations can occur when enzymes are anchored into the pores of the supports. The combination of computational and experimental Indeed, when the inulinases were marked with fluorescein investigations described in this article shed light on the prop- and analyzed by fluorescent microscopy it was evident that erties of an enzymatic preparation of industrial relevance. the protein was present exclusively on the first external layer Homology modeling methods allowed to construct the first of the beads (data not shown), thus favoring the diffusion of three-dimensional structures of exoinulinase from Bacillus
Biotechnol. Prog., 2010, Vol. 26, No. 2 403 The immobilized protein was rinsed with KPi buffer (0.02 M, pH 8.0, ratio support/buffer 1/4 w/v). Adsorbed proteins were desorbed by adding 0.5 M NaCl in KPi buffer (0.02 M pH 8.00, ratio support/buffer 1/4 w/v) and then by stirring for 45 min. The preparations were rinsed with KPi buffer (0.02 M, pH 8.0, ratio support/buffer 1/4 w/v), finally with sodium acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.0) and the activity was checked. The immobilized enzymes were stored at 4 C. Immobilization on amino SepabeadsV R Amino SepabeadsV were pre-activated with glutaraldehyde R (2% v/v in KPi buffer, 0.02M, pH 8.0, support/buffer ratio Figure 10. Kinetic profile and yield of the reaction of inulin hydrolysis catalyzed by Fructozyme L immobilized of 1/4 w/v) for 60 min at 25 C and then washed twice with on Sepabeads EC-EP (black squares: kinetic profile, the same buffer. gray empty squares: yield) and EC-HA (black The immobilization was carried out at 25 C and 40 rpm circles: kinetic profile, gray empty circles: yield). in a blood rotator in KH2PO4/K2HPO4 KPi buffer (0.02 M, Conditions: T ¼ 50 C, [inulin]0 ¼ 2.12 mmol L1, yield is calculated on the basis of the maximum achievable fructose pH 8.0). 77 U of Fructozyme L per gram of wet polymer concentration ¼ 59, 36 mmol L1 (medium degree of poly- were used with a support/buffer ratio of 1/4 w/v. The immo- merization of the inulin ¼ 28 fructose unit). bilization was carried out under stirring for 19 h in KPi buffer (0.02 M, pH 8.0). The solution was filtered and the liquid phase was recovered for protein determination. The stearothermophilus and endoinulinase from Aspergillus immobilized protein was washed with KPi buffer (0.02 M, niger, allowing the analysis of their different regio-selectiv- pH 8.0, ratio support/buffer 1/4 w/v). Adsorbed proteins ity. The information gathered by the computational investi- were desorbed by adding 0.5 M NaCl in KPi buffer (0.02 M gation not only led to a more detailed comprehension of the pH 8.00, ratio support/buffer of 1/4 w/v) and then by stirring catalytic machinery but also allowed to rationalize the exper- for 45 min. The preparations were rinsed with KPi buffer imental strategies for immobilizing the biocatalysts. (0.02 M, pH 8.0, ratio support/buffer 1/4 w/v), finally with In conclusion, this investigation would like to show an sodium acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.0) and the activity was example of how computational methods can be used as a tool checked. The immobilized enzymes were stored at 4 C. not only for understanding enzyme-substrate interactions but also for developing efficient biocatalysts of practical use, thus making biocatalysis less empiric and more rational based. Activity assay The assay is based on the hydrolysis of inulin into fruc- Experimental Section tose. A 10 g/L solution of inulin (average P.M. 4554 Da) in acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.0) was maintained at 50 C. The Materials native or immobilized enzyme was added to the solution of Fructozyme L was from Novozymes (see Supporting inulin and the suspension was stirred for a variable time Information). from 15 to 30 minutes. To stop the reaction, 300 lL of Immobilization carriers: SepabeadsV are methacrylic poly- NaOH 1 M were added to the suspension of native enzyme, R mers produced and commercialized by Resindion S.r.l. (Mit- whereas the immobilized enzyme was filtered off. The solu- subishi Chem. Corp., Milan, Italy), supplied with a water tion was cooled down to 25 C and analyzed by HPLC. The content of about 70% w/w. SepabeadsV with epoxy groups analysis was performed at isocratic conditions, 75% acetoni- R (Sepabeads EC-EP) or amino groups (Sepabeads EC-HA) trile and 25% water, using an integrated system Shimadzu were used in the present work. associated to refractometer RID-6A. An Aphera NH2 Poly- Chemicals: all chemicals were purchased from Sigma– mer column (polyamine-bonded polymeric gel column) 5 l, Aldrich and were used without any further purification. 250 4.6 mm (Astec) was used. Rt fructose: 8 min. The activity was calculated on the basis of a calibration curve. The medium degree of polymerization of the inulin used in all experiments is of 28 fructose unit. Activity ¼ lmol fructose/(min g dry) Spectroscopy: UV measurements were performed with a The activity of Fructozyme L was 851 U per g of prepara- Lambda 20 UV/Vis Perkin–Elmer spectrophotometer. tion or 39 U per mg of protein. Immobilization on epoxy SepabeadsV R Protein determination All the immobilization procedures were performed loading 250 U/gdry of enzymatic native preparation. The immobiliza- The protein content of Fructozyme L (25.17 mg/mL) was tion was carried out at 25 C and 40 rpm in a blood rotator determined by using bicinchoninic acid kit (SIGMA)—Pierce in KH2PO4/K2HPO4 KPi buffer (KH2PO4/K2HPO4 buffer method, using BSA as standard protein. 1.25 M, pH 8.0). 77 U of Fructozyme L per gram of wet The percentage of bound enzyme was determined by the polymer were used with a support/buffer ratio of 1/4 w/v. difference between the concentration of the native protein The immobilization proceeded for 18 h, under constant stir- before immobilization and in the filtrates after immobiliza- ring, then for 20 h without stirring. The solution was filtered tion. The protein amount was determined by Pierce method, and the liquid phase was recovered for protein determination. using inulinase solution for calibration curve.22
404 Biotechnol. Prog., 2010, Vol. 26, No. 2 Determination of water content score of the MOE and one model for each enzyme was cho- The water content of each preparation was evaluated by sen on the basis of the Z score. The quality of the generated drying the samples at 110 C for 6 h on aluminum dishes and models was assessed by the ‘‘protein report’’ tool of the by determining the difference in weight between the wet and MOE program and Ramachandran map (see Supporting the dried sample. Information). The final structures were refined by manual corrections and energy minimizations, during which the minimization Stability software used three derivative methods successively: steepest descent, conjugated gradient and truncated Newton. The A solution of Fructozyme L, diluted in acetate buffer (0.1 AMBER94 force field was used. Refinement of the model M, pH 5.0), was divided into aliquots of 2.5 mL each. Each proceeded up until the obtained protein quality was compara- sample was thermostatted at 65 C for a time from 0 to 90 ble to a medium/high resolution structure. minutes. Each solution was cooled down to 25 C and the re- sidual activity was evaluated. The resulting models were compared by means of the ‘‘protein consensus’’ tool of the MOE package utilized to identify regions with conserved structures. Hydrolysis of inulin catalyzed by the immobilized inulinase Batch tests were run in a system (Applikon, The Nether- lands) consisting of: a 1.5 L glass vessel, a six-blade impel- Docking and molecular dynamics simulation ler driven by an electric motor (Stirrer Motor Assembly Water molecules and all glycosides, unless the fructose P100) controlled by a stirrer controller (P100, ADI 1032), present in the active site of the enzyme, were removed from pH and temperature sensors, a jacket for temperature control the structure of A. awamori exoinulinase 1Y9G (retrieved by means of a Bio Controller (ADI 1030). from PDB). The maintained fructose residue was trans- The reaction volume was 500 mL, pH was kept to 5.0 by formed into a dimer in the case of exoinulinases and into a means of an acetate buffer and its values were constantly hexamer in case of the endoinulinase. The molecules measured; the temperature value was 50 C, enzyme loading obtained functioned as substrates for the respective enzymes, Eo ¼ 1 gwet of both the immobilized preparations, that corre- subsequently used to perform the docking calculations, sub- sponds to 94U for the Sepabeads EC-EP preparation and strates were defined in the same force-field of the rest of the 59U for the other one (Sepabeads EC-HA); and substrate system. (inulin) initial concentration So ¼ 10 g/L (2.12 mM). The substrates were placed manually into the active sites Reaction was quenched by separating the enzyme from and the docking procedure was performed taking into the reacting mixture by means of a 90 lm filter (iron steel account an area of 12 Å around the substrate. The Alpha filter) and samples were immediately analyzed. PMI algorithm was used for the placement procedure in association with the Depth HB scoring function. Two-hun- dred conformations having the highest score were conserved. Computational studies The final spatial conformation was chosen evaluating the All the calculations were performed on a dual Xeon Linux score and the orientation of the substrate in respect to the workstation. catalytic residues of the active site. Homology modeling, molecular dynamics simulations, The areas included in a radius of 12 Å and 5 Å around energy minimizations, and docking were calculated by using the substrate for the two exoinulinases and the endoinulinase the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) version respectively were minimized for 9000 steps totally, using 2006.08 software. For GRID’s MIF calculation the GRID 22 three derivative methods successively: steepest descent, con- Linux edition package was used. jugated gradient and truncated Newton. The AMBER94 force field12 was used for the definition of the entire system. Molecular dynamics simulations of the same enzyme areas Homology model generation were set up for 2000 ps at 300 K in a NTV environment, using AMBER94 force field. The rest of the structure was The aminoacid sequence of A. niger endoinulinase and maintained constrained. B. stearothermophilus exoinulinase (accession number O74641_ASPNG and Q8GI55_BACST respectively in UniProtKB) were taken from the EBI SRS server by using the BlastP algorithm23,24 query instrument. Surface analysis The chain alignment was performed using as template the Water molecules were removed from the crystallographic structure of A. awamori exoinulinase which was retrieved structure 1Y4W, the three-dimensional matrices of interac- from PDB (1Y4W), with the align algorithm of the MOE tion energies (MIFs) were calculated by using the GRID program by using the Blosum 30 amino acid substitution ma- methods with WATER and DRY probes. For each structure trix with a tree-based method,25 visually verified and man- the calculation was performed simulating a grid with 0.5 Å ually corrected. knots distance. The calculated MIFs were visualized with the The construction of the three-dimensional models was car- program Gview setting 4.00 kcal for WATER interactions ried out with the MOE homology modeling module calculat- and 0.25 kcal for DRY interactions. ing 10 intermediate models for each enzyme which were The glycosylation sites in the protein sequences were coarsely minimized maintaining as template the 1Y4W struc- identified by using the protein motifs searching tool FUZZ- ture, purged from water molecules and glycosides. The PRO as available in the EBI SRS server. The standard ‘‘N- obtained structures were ranked by the structure quality Z any-S/T’’ pattern was used as a query.
Biotechnol. Prog., 2010, Vol. 26, No. 2 405 Acknowledgments 13. Goodford PJ. A computational procedure for determining ener- getically favorable binding sites on biologically important mac- The authors are grateful to Resindion S.r.l. (Mitsubishi romolecules. J Med Chem. 1985;28:849–857. Chem. Corp., Milan, Italy) for providing immobilization car- 14. Basso A, Braiuca P, Cantone S, Ebert C, Linda P, Spizzo P, riers and Dr. Laura Ciccarelli for precious technical advice. Caimi P, Hanefeld H, Degrassi G, Gardossi L. In Silico analysis of enzyme surface and glycosylation effect as a tool for efficient covalent immobilization of CalB and PGA on SepabeadsV. Adv R Literature Cited Synth Catal. 2007;349:877–886. 15. Petrescu AJ, Milac AL, Petrescu SM, Dwek RA, Wormald MR. 1. Ricca E, Calabrò V, Curcio S, Iorio G. The state of the art in Statistical analysis of the protein environment of N-glycosyla- the production of fructose from inulin enzymatic hydrolysis. tion sites: implications for occupancy, structure, and folding. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2007;27:129–145. Glycobiology 2004;14:103–114. 2. Sirisansaneeyakul S, Worawuthiyanan N, Vanichsriratana W, 16. Trimble RB, Atkinson PH, Tschopp JF, Townsend RR, Maley Srinophakun P, Chisti Y. Production of fructose from inulin F. Structure of oligosaccharides on Saccharomyces SUC2 using mixed inulinase from Aspergillus niger and Candida invertase secreted by the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. guilliermondii. World J Microb Bio. 2007;23:543–552. J Biol Chem. 1991;34:22807–22817. 3. Vandamme EJ, Derycke DG. Microbial inulinase: fermentation 17. Harte N, Silventoinen V, Quevillon E, Robinson S, Kallio K, process, properties and applications. Adv App Microbiol. 1983; Fustero X, Patel P, Jokinen P, Lopez R. Public web-based serv- 29:139–176. ices from the European Bioinformatics Institute. Nucl Acids 4. Schomburg I, Chang A, Ebeling C, Gremse M, Heldt C, Huhn Res. 2004;32:W3–W9. G, Schomburg D. BRENDA, the enzyme database: updates and 18. Kallenberg AI, Van Rantwijk F, Sheldon RA. Immobilization of major new developments. Nucl Acid Res. 2004;32:431–433. Penicillin G acylase: the key to optimum performance. Adv 5. Ohta K, Setsugu N, Nakamura T. Purification and properties of Synth Catal. 2005;347:905–926. an extracellular inulinase from Rhizopus sp. strain TN-96. 19. Hanefeld U, Gardossi L, Magner E. Understanding enzyme J Biosci Bioeng. 2002;94:78–80. immobilization. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:453–468. 6. Nagem RPA, Rojas AL, Golubev AM, Korneeva OS, 20. Fernández-Lafuente R, Rodriguez V, Mateo C, Penzal G, Her- Eneyskaya EV, Kulminskaya AA, Neutroev KN, Palikarpov I. nández-Justiz O, Irazoqui G, Villarino A, Ovsejevi K, Batista F, Crystal structure of exo-inulinase from Aspergillus awamori: the Guisán JM. Stabilization of multimeric enzymes via immobili- enzyme fold and structural determinants of substrate recogni- zation and post-immobilization techniques. J Mol Cat B: Enz. tion. J Mol Biol. 2004;344:471–480. 1999;7:181–189. 7. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, 21. Mateo C, Abian O, Fernández-Lorente G, Pedroche J, Fernán- Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. dez-Lafuente R, Guisán J, Tam A, Daminati M. Epoxy-Sepa- Nucl Acids Res. 2000;28:235–242. beads: a novel epoxy support for stabilisation of industrial 8. The UniProt Consortium. The universal protein resource enzymes via very intense multipoint covalent attachment. Bio- (UniProt). Nucl Acids Res. 2006;36:190–195. technol Prog. 2002;18:629–634. 9. Lengauer T, Rarey M. Computational methods for biomolecular 22. Giacobini C, Villarino A, Franco-Fraguas L, Batista-Viera F. docking. Curr Opin Struc Biol. 1996;6:402–406. immobilization of b-galactosidase from Kluyveromyces lactis on 10. Alder BJ, Wainwright TE. Studies in molecular dynamics. I. silica and agarose: comparison of different methods. J Mol Cat General method. J Chem Phys. 1959;31:459–466. B: Enz. 1998;4:313–327. 11. Ghazi I, De Segura AG, Fernandez-Arrojo L, Alcalde M, Yates 23. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic M, Rojas-Cervantes ML, Plou FJ, Ballesteros A. Immobilization local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. of fructosyltransferase from Aspergillus aculeatus on epoxy- 24. Gish W, States DJ. Identification of protein coding regions by activated Sepabeads EC for the synthesis of fructo-oligosaccha- database similarity search. Nat Genet. 1993;3:266–272. rides. J Mol Cat B: Enz. 2005;35:19–27. 25. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices 12. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Fergu- from protein blocks. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:10915– son DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A 10919. second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc. 1998; 117:5179–5197. Manuscript received Mar. 20, 2009, and revision received Aug. 7, 2009.
You can also read