EM debt: Our 2020 view - THE BLUEBAY EMERGING MARKETS INVESTMENT TEAM - BlueBay Asset Management
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
EM DEBT: OUR 2020 VIEW After a positive year of returns in 2019, what are your expectations for the asset class going into 2020? POLINA KURDYAVKO, HEAD OF EMERGING MARKETS 2019 proved to be a positive year 2. Maturing EM credit cycle is creating for emerging market (EM) assets, increased price dislocations in liquid In 2020, we stressed credits. expect China to particularly those denominated in As the credit cycle matures, we expect more USD. Returns were robust despite poor provide stimulus stress in idiosyncratic credit stories given the global growth and a number of macro tepid growth outlook combined with a gradual to the domestic risks. path towards global interest rate normalisation. economy While default rates are likely to increase towards both through Coming into 2020, the global liquidity environment the historical average (3.5% for corporate EM infrastructure looks as though it will be supportive for the asset high-yield credits), we expect to see more price spending and class, encouraging investors to search for yield in dislocation in liquid stressed credits, especially loose monetary EM. However, EM growth is likely to remain modest, in some sovereigns. policy accompanied by a slow rise in default rates from the currently low level. Gains therefore could be 3. Domestic stimulus provides liquidity muted at the index level but investors would be support to corporate credit. wise to seek out sources of return, both from the This theme has been playing out in Western long and short side. Europe for several years. In 2020, we expect China to provide stimulus to the domestic We see three key themes driving the performance economy both through infrastructure spending of EM risk assets in 2020: and loose monetary policy. Sectors like Chinese real estate, in our view, will be one of the key 1. Shift from growth to stability presents beneficiaries of that support. potential carry trade opportunities. Historically, investors were focused on growth as a key driver of EM performance. Yet some EM countries have moved away from a ‘boom/bust’ growth profile and towards macroeconomic stability, which provides positive risk-adjusted carry opportunities. PAGE 2
EM DEBT: OUR 2020 VIEW Which risk factors do you think will prove most material in 2020? RUSSEL MATTHEWS, SENIOR PORTFOLIO MANAGER The three risk factors that we think hard currency spreads to incorporate a higher will be most influential are the Fed’s liquidity premium, which could impact our views A more hawkish in some hard currency credits. If this scenario stance from stance, global liquidity and geopolitics. were to materialise, we could express a negative the US Federal A more hawkish stance from the US Federal view through taking a short exposure in EM credit, Reserve is likely Reserve would challenge our view on some as well as using CDS to reduce our exposure to defensive high-carry positions that we have in the market beta or express a negative beta view. to challenge our portfolio. If this scenario were to materialise, we view on some could protect the portfolio through taking a short On geopolitics, material instability can never be defensive high- position in EM FX. ruled out, especially in the Middle East. If tensions carry positions escalate further in the region, which is still a tail that we have in On liquidity, could we see the environment risk, there could be profound implications for the the portfolio become more challenging for EM credit given Middle East, oil prices and potentially sentiment the global monetary and geopolitical backdrop. A around the US economy. Russia could emerge as a more difficult liquidity environment might reprice potential winner from such a situation. PAGE 3
EM DEBT: OUR 2020 VIEW Argentina – is the next stop debt restructuring? GARY SEDGEWICK, PORTFOLIO MANAGER GRAHAM STOCK, EM SENIOR SOVEREIGN STRATEGIST Argentina’s transformational election and multilateral creditors. A fiscal adjustment will, in 2015 promised the electorate, and in our view, be inevitable, whether to comply with In 2019, voters a renegotiated IMF programme or to adapt to reversed the investors, a new market-friendly vision the absence of alternative financing sources, but for the country. direction of travel the Fernandez government will hope to backload completely, In 2019, voters reversed the direction of travel any austerity push and generate a short-term completely, effectively bringing back the old growth boost in the meantime. As a result, we effectively bringing government and expunging the technocratic expect maturity extensions and near-term coupon back the old policymaking of the Macri administration. The holidays, but do not see a need for nominal government August primaries foreshadowing the October haircuts. and expunging election result prompted a sharp drop in bond the technocratic prices, which should serve as a cautionary tale for Additionally, in our view holders of front-end bonds policymaking investors looking to invest not only in Argentina but are in a good position to resist being subordinated in Latin America in general from the perspective of to debt falling due to the IMF in 2022 and 2023, of the Macri shifting political landscapes. and therefore to remain at the front of the queue. administration That said, great volatility can bring great The restructuring process is yet to get underway opportunity and Argentina is no different in but with the above in mind, we favour short-dated this regard. The final recovery prices of the bonds and tactically deploy downside protection via bonds are likely to be determined by three-way medium-term CDS instruments (where possible). discussions between the government, the IMF and Our recovery value analysis shows that the likely bondholders. recovery in the short end should be in a 60-70 range with current bond prices in the low 50s. This In our view, cashflow relief over the next few provides potential opportunity on the upside. years should be the government’s priority even while it seeks to share the burden of adjustment between the domestic population, bondholders PAGE 4
EM DEBT: OUR 2020 VIEW What is the significance of the PrivatBank case to the Zelensky presidency? TIMOTHY ASH, EM SENIOR SOVEREIGN STRATEGIST Ukraine’s President Zelensky was and has pleaded for support from the presidency elected on a ticket to clean up and international financial institutions against the PrivatBank is oligarch. Zelensky has promised a level playing field important as it is corruption, which opinion polls in the fight against corruption but a failure to deal suggest is the top concern for the the largest bank fairly with Kolomoisky on the PrivatBank issue will electorate and business. The travails in the country and leave him vulnerable to claims of applying selective of Ukraine therein have been revealed justice, blowing a hole in his anti-corruption subject to a legal in the Trump impeachment hearings. agenda. The issue is also key to ensuring IMF tussle between support for Ukraine and is the canary in the coal the Ukrainian PrivatBank is important as it is the largest bank in mine for investors as to whether Zelensky is a real authorities and the country and subject to a legal tussle between reformer. Igor Kolomoisky, the Ukrainian authorities and Igor Kolomoisky, a a highly highly controversial oligarch who backed Zelensky’s US support for Ukraine in the period since election campaign. Kolomoisky is accused of EuroMaydan has been critical in holding off controversial fraud in the failure of the bank which resulted in pressure in the East from Russia. The Trump oligarch who its eventual nationalisation in 2016 and losses of impeachment hearings have underlined that backed Zelensky’s USD5.5bn (6% of GDP at the time) suffered as a this support is to some extent dependent on election campaign result by the state. Ukraine showing a willingness to fight corruption. All this has made a satisfactory resolution of the The Central Bank now accuses Kolomoisky of PrivatBank mission critical. running a campaign of terror against its employees PAGE 5
EM DEBT: OUR 2020 VIEW This document is issued in the United Kingdom (UK) by BlueBay Asset Management LLP (BlueBay), which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA). This document may also be issued in the United States by BlueBay Asset Management LLC which is registered with the SEC and the NFA. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Unless otherwise stated, all data has been sourced by BlueBay. To the best of BlueBay’s knowledge and belief this document is true and accurate at the date hereof. BlueBay makes no express or implied warranties or representations with respect to the information contained in this document and hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of accuracy, completeness or fitness for a particular purpose. This document is intended for “professional clients” and “eligible counterparties” (as defined by the FCA) only and should not be relied upon by any other category of customer. Except where agreed explicitly in writing, BlueBay does not provide investment or other advice and nothing in this document constitutes any advice, nor should be interpreted as such. No BlueBay Fund will be offered, except pursuant and subject to the offering memorandum and subscription materials (the “Offering Materials”). If there is an inconsistency between this document and the Offering Materials for the BlueBay Fund, the provisions in the Offering Materials shall prevail. You should read the Offering Materials carefully before investing in any BlueBay fund. This document does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase any security or investment product in any jurisdiction and is for information purposes only. No part of this document may be reproduced in any manner without the prior written permission of BlueBay Asset Management LLP. Copyright 2020 © BlueBay, the investment manager, advisor and global distributor of the BlueBay Funds, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada and the BlueBay Funds may be considered to be related and/or connected issuers to Royal Bank of Canada and its other affiliates. ® Registered trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. RBC Global Asset Management is a trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. BlueBay Asset Management LLP, registered office 77 Grosvenor Street, London W1K 3JR, partnership registered in England and Wales number OC370085. The term partner refers to a member of the LLP or a BlueBay employee with equivalent standing. Details of members of the BlueBay Group and further important terms which this message is subject to can be obtained at www. bluebay.com. All rights reserved. PAGE 8
You can also read