Deutsche Bank Global Auto Industry y Conference - Brad Hughes, CFO January 10, 2012
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Safe Harbor Statement This presentation contains strategic goals and other forward looking statements related to future financial results forward-looking and business operations for Cooper Tire & Rubber Company. Actual results may differ materially from the goals and from current management forecasts and projections as a result of factors over which the Company may have limited or no control. Information on certain of these risk factors and additional information on forward-looking statements are included in the Company’s reports on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are set forth at the end of this presentation. presentation FY 2011 results are scheduled to be released on Feb. 27, 2012 See Coopertire.com for details. 2
Available Information Our internet address is http://www.coopertire.com. We webcast our earnings calls and certain events we participate in or host on the investor relations portion of our website, http://coopertire.com/investors.aspx. We also make available on our website free of charge a variety of information for investors. investors Our goal is to maintain the investor relations portion of the website as a portal through which investors can easily find or navigate to pertinent information about us, including: • our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments d t to t those th reports, t as soon as reasonably bl practicable ti bl after ft we electronically l t i ll filfile that material with or furnish it to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); • information on our business strategies, financial results and selected key performance indicators; • announcements of our p participation p at investor conferences and other events;; • press releases on quarterly earnings, product and service announcements and legal developments; • corporate governance information; and • other th news and d announcements t that th t we may postt ffrom ti time to t time ti that th t investors i t might i ht find fi d useful or interesting. The content of our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this presentation or in any report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC, and any references to our website is intended to be inactive textual references only. 3
Agenda g Recent News Company Background Q3 2011 Summary Raw Materials Strategic Plan and Current Tactics Balance Sheet and Investments Changing Industry Factors Other Items Risks 4
Recent news July and September 2011 - Cooper Zeon RS3™ UHP tire and Cooper Discoverer A/T3™ tire recognized by a prominent consumer testing organization as best available on the market July 2011 - S&P upgraded CTB's corporate family outlook to positive from stable August 2011 - Cooper recognized by Sears with a Partner in Progress Award November 2011 - United Steelworkers Local 207L (USW) locked out of the Findlay plant December 2011 – Implemented a price increase in the U.S. of up to 5% with in-line adjustments effective Dec. 1, 2011 December 2011 - Agreement signed to acquire the assets of an existing tire plant in Kruševac, Serbia 5
A leader in the tire industryy 2010 Sales by Segment 9th largest global tire manufacturer and 4th largest in the U.S. 30% North America 2010 revenue of $3.4 billion 70% International 13% market share in the U.S. light vehicle replacement tire market 5% 2010 Sales S l byb P Product* d t* Limited O.E. O E presence 5% Passenger Rapidly growing international 20% Light Truck segment 50% Commercial Truck Winter 2010 unit sales ≈47 million tires 20% Specialty 6 *based on net sales, primarily in the replacement market
With a g global network and p presence Note: Operations in Rongcheng City, China, and Guadalajara, Mexico are not wholly owned. Assets from the operation in Kruševac, Serbia should be acquired in early 2012. 7
A flexible and cost effective manufacturingg network Cooper Chengshan Tire (CCT), Findlay, y OH ((mfg, g R&D, Corp p HQ)) Rongcheng g g City, y, China ((mfg) g) Texarkana, AR (mfg) Cooper Kunshan Tire (CKT), Tupelo, MS (mfg) Kunshan, China (mfg) Pearsall, TX (test track) Asia Technical Center (ATC) and HQ, Sh h i China Shanghai, Chi (R&D) Occidente, Guadalajara, Mexico (mfg) Melksham, England (mfg, R&D, Stow, OH (Mickey Thomson HQ) European HQ) Clarksdale, MS (rubber mixing) Cooper Tire Serbia (mfg) Kruševac, Serbia* p Cooper's g alternatives are used to maximize cost effectiveness using sourcing g high g quality, near source operations. Note: Operations in Rongcheng City, China, and Guadalajara, Mexico are not wholly owned. *Deal for assets should close in early 2012 subject to conditions of offer. 8
A strong, diverse brand portfolio… House Brands Private Brand Distributors and National Retailers 9
A historically resilient industry in the U.S. Light g vehicle replacement p tire industryy shipments p Millions 300 of tires Passenger Light Truck In four decades only once has there been a period of two consecutive years of decline 250 233 235 238 238 226 225 228 230 230 226 222 223 225 217 218 208 36 36 34 34 34 29 29 34 31 34 34 29 29 200 31 28 29 150 100 199 199 202 196 204 201 196 197 186 192 191 191 194 194 190 179 50 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Light Truck 29 31 34 34 31 34 34 36 36 34 34 29 28 29 29 29 Passenger 179 186 192 199 191 191 194 199 202 196 204 194 190 201 196 197 10 2011 and 2012 are based on RMA estimates released December 2, 2011
A Company p y that can g grow USD Billions Total North America International 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 North America 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.4 International 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.3 Eliminations (0 1) (0.1) (0 1) (0.1) (0 1) (0.1) (0 2) (0.2) (0 2) (0.2) (0 2) (0.2) (0 3) (0.3) Total 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.8 3.4 11
Tire shipments can be impacted by economic factors Percentage change in United States Shipments Q3 2011 vs Q3 2010 YTD Sept. 2011 vs YTD Sept. 2010 Total RMA Total RMA Industry Members Cooper Industry Members Cooper Passenger 0.2% -1.9% -1.0% -1.2% -1.1% -3.1% Light Truck 0.1% -3.2% 11.9% 4.7% 4.8% 10.2% Total Light g Vehicle 0.2% -2.1% 1.1% -0.5% -0.4% -0.9% Medium Truck 1.9% -1.7% 52.3% 9.1% 5.1% 58.6% Third quarter shipments were strongest in the UHP and light truck product lines lines, while broadline and value tires continued to be the most impacted by the economic environment. November shipments were down .9% for replacement light vehicle for the total industry, and down 1.9% year to date. 12 Data Source: RMA and Cooper Tire
Q3 2011 Related information including an operating profit walk from the prior year are available at Coopertire.com under Investor Relations (millions USD, except EPS) Change from Net Sales by Segment Q3 2011 Q3 2010 Prior Year North American Tire $ 765 $ 648 18.0% International Tire 422 325 29.7% Eliminations (133) (90) 47.7% Total Company $ 1,054 $ 883 19.3% Operating p g Profit byy Segment g OP % OP % North American Tire $ 17 2.3% $ 55 8.5% $ (38) International Tire 30 7.2% 21 6.3% 10 Eliminations 0 (1) 2 Corporate (1) (7) 6 Total Company $ 47 4.5% 4 5% $ 67 7.6% 7 6% $ (20) Earnings Per Share (diluted) from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $ 0.27* $ 0.71 $ (0.44) Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 91 $ 347 $ (256) amounts are unaudited and may not add due to rounding *includes 14 cents of additional tax expense because of the timing of credits and deductions. These items are expected to be largely offset with the anticipated fourth quarter release of the majority of the U.S. valuation 13 allowance.
9 Months Ended September 30, 2011 (millions USD, except EPS) 9 Months Ended 9 Months Ended September 30, September 30, Change from Net Sales by Segment 2011 2010 Prior Year North American Tire $ 2,079 $ 1,754 18.5% International Tire 1,181 931 26.9% Eliminations (379) (244) 55.2% Total Company $ 2,882 $ 2,441 18.0% Operating Profit by Segment OP % OP % North American Tire $ 43 2.0% $ 88 5.0% $ (46) International Tire 74 6.3% 64 6.8% 10 Eliminations (2) (2) (1) Corporate (10) (16) 6 Total Company $ 104 3.6% $ 134 5.5% $ (30) Earnings Per Share (diluted) from continuing operations available to common stockholders $ 0.71 $ 1.21 $ (0.50) Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 91 $ 347 $ (256) amounts are unaudited and may y not add due to rounding g 14
Tires are a complex p product p Input % of CoGS Raw Materials 50-55% Labor 20-30% Other 15-30% Raw Material Breakdown % of RM Natural Rubber 20-25% Synthetic Rubbers 25-30% Carbon Black 10-15% Reinforcing Fabrics 10-15% 10 15% Steel 10-15% Other Raw Materials 10-15% Note: These costs are historical estimates of typical costs and are based on production in what would traditionally be considered a high cost country. Raw 15 material in Q3,2011 was approximately 65% of CoGS for the total Company.
Raw material cost volatility is a challenge Cooper's Raw Material Index Q3 2011 = 276 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Q4, 2011 is an estimate based on a sequential decrease of < 5%. 16
A long-term g strategy gy g guides current tactics Focus Areas • Profitable sales growth g • grow international sales to 50% of sales • focus on house and premium products • Next level cost competiveness • High performing team & culture • Product availability and supply • ERP deployment readiness • Brand refresh More details on Cooper's Cooper s Strategic Plan are available at Coopertire.com 17
Successful new product launches support growth Cooper Zeon RS3™ UHP tire and the Cooper Discoverer AT3 ™ recognized by a prominent consumer testing organization as best b t available il bl on th the market. k t Media Recognition Brand Embedment Exciting Products Significant product launches including 18 commercial tires are occurring around the globe.
A solid balance sheet and available liquidity q y millions USD 9/30/2011 Cash & cash equivalents $91 Parent Company Credit Lines $275 to $375 $366 tto $466 Liquidity Items for Consideration Capital expenditures between $140 and $160 million in 2011 Depreciation approximately $130 million in 2011 Lowest level of cash needed = $75 million Additional $231 million of credit available in China Long Term Debt 9/30/2011 12/31/2010 Corporate Debt Ratings: Parent Company 8% unsecured notes due Deceomber 2019 $ 174 $ 174 Moody's B1, Stable 7.625% unsecured notes due March 2027 117 117 S&P BB-, Positive Capitalized leases and other 10 11 301 301 Subsidiaries 56 26 Total debt 357 327 Less current maturities 27 6 $ 330 $ 321 19
Investment decisions focus on creating shareholder value Funding Considerations Sustaining basic operations Cash & Cash Dividends Equivalents (millions Strategic investments USD) at 12/31 Profitable growth 2005 $280 C t reductions Cost d ti 2006 $222 Additional pension funding 2007 $508 Optimize WACC, long-term capital structure, 2008 $248 and credit rating 2009 $427 Opportunistic capital structure changes 2010 $413 Other shareholder-friendly actions Analysis includes a review of returns and the anticipated future business environment. Priorities can change based on those expectations. Cash at September 30, 2011, was $91 million. 20 20
Preparing 421 Tariff p g for a changing Impact g g industryy • Additional Tire Labeling tariff of 30% on Chinese tires will reduce 421 Tariff to 25% Cooper in Sep, supports 2011it and 0% at Sep. to the extent 2012. Additional tariff of 30% on Chinese tires will enhance consumers consumers' reduced d d tto 25% in i September S t b 2011 andd will ill Companies • understanding have of tires in a increased imports be 0% infrom Septembercountries 2012. reasonable other than manner. China. Companies have increased imports from countries other than China. Regulations are still being Cooper p is well-positioned p to deal with either refined, fi • Cooper C d i implementation l t ti b begins i iis wellll positioned i in iti d to t d deall with ith either scenario (tariff ith scenario continuing or expiring). i 2012 in Europe. Enhanced competiveness at U.S. (tariff continuing Cooper continues to be engaged or expiring). plants Supply from Mexico and will use our g strengths – Enhanced competiveness at U.S.to U SFlexibility plants at Cooper Kunshan Tire (can benefit as the regulations are sell into China starting in 2012) finalized. – Supply from Mexico – Flexibility atRolling Cooper Kunshan Resistance Tire and Fuel Efficiency Cooper launched a "green tire" the GFE, in 2009. Investments in related technology will continue. Future products will include this technology to drive value for the consumer consumer. 21 21
Other Items Cooper expects to release the majority of the valuation allowance on U.S. taxes in Q4 2011. (At September 30, 2011, the valuation allowance was $171 million) Products P d t liability li bilit charges h ffor th the ffullll year off 2011 should h ld ffollow ll th the ttrendd off expense consistent with recent trends after adjusting for the Toe case and for higher legal fees, as we do not expect any insurance recoveries for fees going forward. For more information on Products Liability please refer to our 10-K 10 K and other filings. filings Pension costs are similar in 2011 to 2010. Funding levels similar to 2010 at $40 million. Effective tax rates for the full year 2011 were projected as of the Q3 2011 earnings release to be in the 20% to 30% range for 2011. 22 22
Q Questions? i ? 23 23
Risks It is possible that actual results may differ materially from those projections or expectations due to a variety of factors, including but not limited to: • changes in economic and business conditions in the world; • the failure to achieve expected sales levels; • the impact of labor problems, including a work stoppage at the Company or at one or more of its large customers or suppliers; • volatility in raw material and energy prices, including those of rubber, steel, petroleum based products and natural gas and the unavailability of such raw materials or energy sources; • consolidation among the Company's competitors or customers; • technology advancements; • the failure of the Company’s suppliers to timely deliver products in accordance with contract specifications; • changes in interest or foreign exchange rates; • changes in the Company’s customer relationships, including loss of particular business for competitive or other reasons; • the impact of reductions in the insurance program covering the principal risks to the Company, and other unanticipated events and conditions; • the inability to obtain and maintain price increases to offset higher production or material costs; • increased competitive activity including actions by larger competitors or lower-cost producers; • the inability to recover the costs to develop and test new products or processes; • the risks associated with doingg business outside of the United States;; • changes in pension expense and/or funding resulting from investment performance of the Company’s pension plan assets and changes in discount rate, salary increase rate, and expected return on plan assets assumptions, or changes to related accounting regulations; • government regulatory initiatives; • litigation brought against the Company including products liability; • an adverse change g in the Company’s p y credit ratings,g , which could increase its borrowingg costs and/or hamper p its access to the credit markets;; • changes to the credit markets and/or access to those markets; • inaccurate assumptions used in developing the Company’s strategic plan or operating plans or the inability or failure to successfully implement such plans; • inability to adequately protect the Company’s intellectual property rights; • failure to successfullyy integrate g acquisitions q into operations p or their related financings g mayy impact p liquidity q y and capital p resources;; • inability to use deferred tax assets; • changes to tariffs on certain tires imported into the United States from the People's Republic of China or the imposition of new tariffs or trade restrictions; • and changes in the Company’s relationship with joint-venture partners. 24 24
You can also read