Demographic and social changes: issues for the sixth central pay commission

 
CONTINUE READING
special article

Demographic and Social Changes:
Issues for the Sixth Central Pay Commission

Mukesh Anand, Saswata Chaudhury

                                                                  A
Inadequate synchronisation of central government                          nalysis of expenditure on wages and salaries and pen-
service and superannuation rules with a favourable                        sions and retirement benefits of central government (CG)
                                                                          employees, reveals that the proportion of the former has
demographic structure and social developments
                                                                  gradually declined from above 90 per cent in 1950-51 to less
may  adversely affect labour and effort of government             than 70 per cent in 2004-05 [Anand and Chaudhury 2007]. Thus
employees. A slowdown in  fresh recruitment has had a             the quantum of deferred compensation has grown substan-
negative impact on the system-dependency ratio and                tially and current compensation accounts for a dimini­shing
                                                                  proportion of total remuneration. Further, this does not include
the improvement in age-dependency has not resulted
                                                                  the medical benefits that would likely raise the proportion of
in economic benefits. Some recent decisions may                   deferred compensation substantially [Nyce and Schieber 2005].1
exacerbate both inter- and intra-generational equity
                                                                  1 Outline
concerns in employees’ compensation. These may have
                                                                  The demographic change of specific concern, in this paper, relates
implications for the cost and  quality of public services.
                                                                  to age-distribution of population. Similarly, a relevant social
                                                                  change relates to increase in womens’ labour force participation.
                                                                  In several subtle ways, these changes impact the passivity ratio,
                                                                  dependency ratio and replacement ratio.2 Passivity ratio is the
                                                                  ratio of number of post-retirement years (until death) to number
                                                                  of working years; dependency ratio is the ratio of number of old
                                                                  (non-workers) to number of young (workers); replacement ratio
                                                                  is the ratio of compensation or payment in old age (non-working
                                                                  years) to the payment in youth (working years). These three para-
                                                                  metric ratios profoundly influence the sustainability of a pensions
                                                                  programme [Anand 2007; Whitehouse 2007]. These also carry
                                                                  signals that set incentives for individuals in exercising their choice
                                                                  of employment in government service. In Section 2, we highlight
                                                                  the relatively slow paced adjustment of normal age of superannu-
                                                                  ation to improvement in expectation of life. This has steadily
                                                                  raised passivity ratio in CG services. Improvement in longevity
                                                                  along with change in fertility impacts population age-distribution
                                                                  that, in turn, determines the dependency ratio. An analogy for
                                                                  (system) dependency in central government employees (CGE) is
                                                                  detailed in Section 3. Section 4 discusses liberalisation of superan-
                                                                  nuation benefits that has raised the proportion of deferred com-
                                                                  pensation (replacement ratio), in CG service, higher than ostensi-
                                                                  bly desired.3 Technological change induced skill requirement and
                                                                  change in womens’ labour force participation influence group and
                                                                  gender composition of CGE. These are discussed in Section 5. Sec-
                                                                  tion 6 concludes by highlighting additional issues concerning
                                                                  inter- and intra-generational equity.

Mukesh Anand (manand@nipfp.org.in) is at the National Institute   2 Life Expectancy and Age of Superannuation
of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi and Saswata Chaudhury     Change in the normal age of superannuation in central govern-
(som0303@gmail.com) is at the Indian Council for Research on      ment service shows (Table 1, p 55) an increase of five years over a
International Economic Relations, New Delhi.
                                                                  period of six decades.
54                                                                                      february 16, 2008   EPW   Economic & Political Weekly
special article

    The last increase in normal age of superannuation, by two                                               probably raised the proportion of the elderly (60+ years) in the
years, was introduced after almost four decades in 1998. In the                                             population and gradually worsened old-age dependency ratio. In
interim, significant improvements were achieved in expectation                                              contrast, fertility decline in the last two decades has lowered the
of life. Data from the Sample Registration System (SRS) [Regis-                                             proportion of young dependents. Figure 3 depicts the population
Table 1: Normal Age of         trar General of India 2006] shows that,                                      dependency ratio for two differing combinations of age groups. It
Superannuation (years)         expectation of life at birth was 49.7 years in                               portrays an improvement in (lowering of) dependency ratio, that
Period                     Age
                               1975. This increased by 12.8 years to 62.5                                   is expected to bode well
1938 to 1962                55
                               years in 2002, an increase of almost 26 per                                  for growth in output (and Table 2: Economic (or Worker) Dependency Ratio
1962 to May 13, 1998        58                                                                                                                     Census                                NSSO
                               cent in as many years (Panel A, Figure 1).                                   hence income).                  Year         Dependants         Year           Dependants
May 13, 1998 onwards 60
Source: GoI (1997), Muthuswamy Over the same period expectation of life                                        A more relevant measure                     Per 1000		                    Per 1000 Workers
                                                                                                                                                          Workers		                     PS + SS         PS
and Brinda (2002).
                               at 60 increased by 3.4 years (from 13.8 to                                   however, is the ratio of
                                                                                                                                            (1)               (2)            (3)          (4)          (5)
17.2, Panel B, Figure 1) and, that at 70 increased by 2.5 years                                             number of non-workers
                                                                                                                                            1961-62         1328          1977-78        1364       1695
(from 8.9 to 11.4), an increase of 25 and 28 per cent respectively.4                                        (non-earners) to number
                                                                                                                                            1971-72         2037          1983-84        1381        1674
    Slow adjustment of normal age of superannuation, in relation                                            of workers (earners), that 1981-82 1725                       1987-88        1427       1740
to improvement in life expectancy, is manifest in an increase in                                            is, a measure of economic 1991-92 1667                        1993-94        1381       1667
the number of pensioners drawing benefits (this is discussed                                                dependency (Table 2).           2001-02         1558          1999-2000 1519            1740
further in the next section). Alternatively, this is an adverse                                                In any case, economic 		                                   2003-04        1375       1625
Figure 1: Expectation of Life at Birth and at Age 60, Male and Female (in Years)                            dependency is much higher (1) PS, Principal Activity Status; SS, Subsidiary Activity Status.
                                                                             Panel B:B:At Age6060                                           (2) Census figures portray a decline in economic dependency
80
                       Panel A: At Birth
                                                               20
                                                                               Panel   At Age
                                                                                                     2002
                                                                                                            (worse) than age-depend- over the past four decades. However, such a trend is not seen
60             1991
                   2002                       1991
                                                  2002
                                                               15           1991
                                                                                2002             1991
                                                                                              1971
                                                                                                            ency. Segregating the in National Sample Survey Organisation data, especially upon
                                                                         1971                                                               excluding workers with subsidiary status (col 5).
            1971                           1971
                                                                      1951
                                                                                           1951             population into the age Source: Authors’ own computations. Basic Data: Census of India;
40       1951                        1951                      10
                                                                                                            groups 0-19, 20-64 and GoI (2001, 2005).
20                                                             5
                                                                                                            65-plus (instead of 0-14,
 0                                                             0
                Male                        Female                         Male
                                                                            1                  Female
                                                                                                 2
                                                                                                            15-59 and 60-plus) years raises (that is, worsens) the age-depend-
                 1                            2
Figure pertains to five year moving average ending with year shown.                                         ency ratio, but it is still far below the estimate for economic
Source: GoI 2005; Census of India 2001 (Population Projections).
                                                                                                            dependency (compare Table 2 and unshaded bars in Figure 3).
outcome of a rapid increase in the passivity ratio5 that profoundly                                         However, any realistic assessment of dependency should account
impacts the proportion of expenditure on present and ex-employ-                                             for a gradual shifting out of average age of entry into the labour
ees. An increase in the passivity ratio, ceteris paribus under a                                            force, as well as the likelihood of a longer spell in the labour
defined benefit (DB) system of pensions, would continually raise                                            force, commensurate with improvements in average educa-
the proportion of deferred compensation. On the contrary, under                                             tional achievement, health and longevity.
a defined contribution (DC) system, it re-exposes individuals to
longevity risk.6 Public policy, therefore, should devise acceptable 4 Retirement Benefits and Replacement Ratio
norms to circumscribe passivity (see Table A1, p 57). In addition, The rules governing retirement benefits for CG employees have
the passivity ratio based on superannuating pensioners only, may been continually liberalised and the social security net has
be an underestimate as it is unadjusted for survivor pensioners. expanded (Table B1, p 57). Not only the quantum of benefits,
These and other issues relating to liberalisation of retirement but   also the domain of beneficiaries has been expanded.
benefits are discussed in Section 4.          Figure 2: Growth of Total Population and of Elderly                                      While  improved estimates are desir­able,
                                               2.4                                                                                 7   crude projections suggest that, for an
3 Elderly Population and                       1.9
                                                                 Annual average growth
                                                                                                                                       individual, deferred component con­
                                                                    preceding decade                                               6.5
Dependency Ratio                                                      (%, left scale)                                                  stitutes more than one-third of total life-
                                               1.4
Over the last century, the population has                                                                                          6   time compensation. If one includes
                                               0.9                                                    Annual average growth
grown at an average annual rate of 1.47                                                               since 1901 (%, left scale)
                                                                                                                                   5.5
                                                                                                                                       medical benefits, then perhaps the
                                               0.4
per cent per annum. However, the                                                 60 + population (%, of total,
                                                                                         right scale)
                                                                                                                                       deferred component may be upward of
                                              -0.1                                                                                 5
compounded annual average growth rate                1901         1921           1941         1961          1981           2001        two-fifths. Coupled with secure service
(CAGR) of 0.83 per cent between 1901 Source: Authors’ own computations, Basic Data: Singh et al 1989; Census of India.                 conditions, such a structure of com­
and 1951, was significantly lower than Figure 3: Age Dependency Ratio (per thousand persons)                                           pensation leads to perverse incentives
2.11 per cent between 1951 and 2001. The 1991                                                                                          and perhaps induces conservatism in
growth in population was at its peak 2001                                                                                              work effort.
acceleration in the 1950s. The rate 2011                                                                                                  Inadequate appreciation of the fiscal
plateaued in 1960s and, has declined 2021                                                                                              impact of the change in rules governing
since then (left-hand scale in Figure 2).      2026
                                                                                                                                       retirement benefits appears as a major
   High fertility rates around the middle                                                                                              lacuna. The Fifth Pay Commission (FPC)
                                                    0           200          400          600          800         1000          1200
of the last century combined with                                          0-14 and 60 +           0-19 and 65 +                       had recommended raising the pro­portion
improvement in expectation of life at Dependency per thousand persons between 15-59 (20-64) years.                                     of commutation to 40 per cent of pension
                                              Source: Authors’ own computations. Basic Data: Census of India 2001 (Population
older ages, (Panel B, Figure 1) has Projections).                                                                                      and to reduce length of restoration
Economic & Political Weekly                  EPW         february 16, 2008                                                                                                                            55
speciAl article

period to 12 years. The latter though was left unchanged at superannuation. Thus,  w idening the domain of the social
15   years. It is likely that in the last few years a significant security net is likely to  have a multiplicative effect on the effec-
pro­portion of pensioners have become eligible for restoration tive replacement ratio.8
of   the commuted amount. While no con­firmed   data is availa-
ble,   this is arguable given that life expectancy at age 60 5 Gender and Group Composition
                                     ex­ceeds   15 years (Figure 1, Panel B). The discussion in the preceding sections focused on age
Table 3: Replacement Ratio:          Moreover India, perhaps, is the only (demographic) dimension. However several social changes have
CG Employees Joining Service
in 1961-62 (in %)                    (or, one of few) country(ies) that also occurred in the interim. Two such changes are likely to
    Age of                           allows for such restoration of contribute significantly towards correcting intra-generational
Superannuation  60         62    65
 Age of Joining                      commuted amounts.                                     inequity. The first relates to increase in women’s participation,
    Service 			                         While not a precise representation, and second to changes in structural composition of CG
        

      23              53 43       30 Tables 3 and 4 present replacement workforce.
      25              55 44       31 ratios for two differing hypothetical
      27              55 46       32 cases of individuals in CG services. 5.1 Women’s Participation
Source: Authors’ own computation.
                                     The average (annual) salary is The proportion of women workers in CG civilian services in
Table 4: Replacement Ratio: CG       projected, based on trend rate of 1979-80, 1980-81 and 1981-82 was (roughly) 3.53, 3.64 and 3.80
Employees Retiring in 2002-03
(in %)
                                     growth (3.54 per cent per annum per cent respectively [GoI 1991]. As per the report of the FPC,
    Age of                           at   constant 1999-2000 prices) of there were 2.83 lakh women workers constituting 7.51 per cent of
Superannuation  60         62    65 average salary compensation between CG civilian workers. It is likely that, in the intervening period
 Age of Joining
                                     1961-62 and 2002-03 [Anand and since 1993-94, the number of women workers in CG services has
        

    Service

      23              57 47       34
                                     Chaudhury 2007]. The annual increased. But, the occupational exigencies of its largest two
      25              59 48       35 average pension payment is estimated employers, namely, railways and defence may be inhibiting, even
      27              61 50       36 as 50 per cent of current wage if newer vistas are also opening up there for women.
Source: Authors’ own computation.    compensation.7 Replacement ratios                          As per the latest data (for the year 2002) from the SRS [Regis-
                                     are esti­mated   as cumulated deferred trar General of India 2006], life expectancy at birth for females
compensation during years in retirement as a ratio of cumulated exceeds that for males by about Table 5: Difference in Life Expectancy
salary com­pensation.                                                                      1.7 years (Table 5).                      (Years) at Various Ages, 2002
    Table 3 pertains to individuals of differing ages joining service                           In India, the normal age of Age                          At Birth 20 30 60 70
                                                                                                                                     (Female minus Male)
on the same date in 1961-62 and Table 4 pertains to individuals superannuation is identical for
                                                                                                                                     Expectation of Life   1.7 3.1 3.3 2.0 1.3
retiring on the same date in 2002-03. Along the columns of each males and females (gender Source: Authors’ own computations; Basic Data: Same
table, one may read-off the replacement ratio for individuals neutrality).9 Ceteris paribus, as Figure 1.
joining service at differing ages, given some mandatory age of an increase in proportion of females, in CG employment, is likely
superannuation (60, 62 or 65 years). Conversely, figures along to raise replacement ratio, largely due to some increase in average
the rows are replacement ratios for individuals joining service at passivity ratio.
a particular age but retiring at differing mandatory age of super-                              Wider participation of women is likely to improve (lower) the
annuation. The replacement ratio along a column increases economic dependency ratio. Further, there is significant evidence
largely due to an increase in passivity ratio. On the contrary, that an increase in female labour force participation boosts
movement along a row mimics a decline in passivity, inducing a economic growth and development [Nyce and Schieber 2005].
decline in the replacement ratio.                                                          However, if not complemented adequately with enabling provi-
    For ease of exposition, assume that expectation of life, at sions, there is the likelihood of an adverse impact on fertility.
age 60, is 15 years for those joining service in 1961-62. The This in turn may have an adverse impact on future economic
cor­responding expectation of life for those retiring in 2002-03 dependency ratio.
is  16 years. Between Tables 3 and 4, one observes an increase
in  t he replacement ratio for the corresponding cells. Note 5.2 Group Composition
that  an improvement in expectation of life by one year, without The size of CGE expanded in 1960s and early 1970s (Figure 4).
any change in the mandatory age of superannuation, raises This bulge, in employee intake then, has likely resulted in a
the  passivity ratio and consequently                                                                                      ballooning number of superannuating
the  replacement ratio. Note also that Figure 4: Number of Public Sector Workers (in lakhs)                                pensioners in the 1990s. While a more
                                                        80
these are conservative estimates of                                                                                        detailed study is desirable, past employ-
expectation of life and thus provide a 60                         State government
                                                                                                                           ment trends hint that growth in number
                                                                                                          Quasi government
lower bound for the true replace­                                                         Central government
                                                                                                                           of pensioners from CG services maybe
ment    ratio. Given our assumptions, 40                                                                                   plateauing soon. This is also borne out
ceteris paribus, a one-year improve­ 20                                                                                    by relatively slow growth in pension
ment   in expectation of life raises the                                                  Local bodies                     expenditure in recent years, even if
replacement ratio by approximately 4                     0
                                                          1960-61 1966-67 1972-73 1978-79 1984-85 1990-91 1996-97 2002-03
                                                                                                                           improvement in expectation of life has
per cent, for a given mandatory age of Source: GoI 2005.                                                                   led to cumulation of pensioners.
56                                                                                                                  february 16, 2008      EPW    Economic & Political Weekly
special article

   Importantly, the structure of CGE has  undergone perceptible        Annexure A: Hypothetical Scenarios to Estimate Passivity Ratio
change over the decades. Technological advancement has                 We assume that an average worker in the year 1921 joined civilian
induced  a decline in number and proportion of group D                 service at age 20. Corresponding age on joining service is 22 and 25
employees, especially in civilian services from 56.30 per cent         years respectively in 1963 and 2006. The fourth example is of a de-
in  1957 to 27.27 per cent in 1994 [GoI 1997: 230). It is likely       fence personnel joining service at a relatively lower age. Table A1 then
                                                                       tracks these individuals, assuming that each worker provides full
that  this proportion would continue to decline. On the other
                                                                       service up to normal age of retirement (reduced for defence person-
hand, there has been a rapid expansion in number of group C            nel) [Unnithan 2007] and lives full average expected life.
employees, with sanctioned posts almost quadrupling between            Note that full-service period is rendered ineffective in all cases, as
1957 and 1994.                                                         expected working life upon joining service is longer than full service
   In the medium term, it is likely that need for group B              period. To encourage merit, increase in full service period stipulation
                                                                       may need to exceed increase in the age of retirement.
workers  may rise. The (observed) average age on joining
                                                                       Table A1: Hypothetical Central Government Employee
service   is likely to be higher in upper hierarchical groups. But
                                                                       Attribute                                                        Civil                             Defence
employees, especially in group A, also move along a steeper                                                                       I                II               III              IV
compensation profile. Ceteris paribus, therefore an increase in        Date of birth                                        July 1, 1901 July 1, 1941 July 1, 1981 July 1, 1981
the proportion of employees in upper hierarchical groups               Age at joining service (years)                            20                22              25                18
would  gradually push up the per worker (average) cost of govern-      Date of joining service                              July 1, 1921 July 1, 1963 July 1, 2006 July 1, 1999
ment employment. While our estimates of the replacement ratio          Normal age of superannuation upon
are based on average current compensation, most pensioners              joining service (years)                                  55                58              60                40
                                                                       Expected date of retirement                           July 1956          July 1999       July 2041      July 2021
derive benefits based on compensation that are likely closer to
                                                                       Expected working life                                     35                36              35                22
maximum of the range (for a group). This is likely to raise replace-
                                                                       Expectation of life at birth (years)                     ~ 24              ~ 32            ~ 54              ~54
ment ratio further.
                                                                       Expectation of life on joining service (years)           ~ 25              ~ 36            ~ 42              ~49
                                                                       Change in normal age of superannuation No Change  60 (in   No Change No Change
6 Conclusions                                                          		                                               May 1998)
The FPC alluded to right-sizing of CGE and had also indicated          Actual working life                                  No Change              38          No Change No Change
existing slack, leading to over employment and therefore ineffi-       Date of retirement                                    July 1956          July 2001       July 2041      July 2021
ciency (in terms of costs) of government operations. Figure 4          Full service period (years)                               30                33              33
suggests that decline in the number of employees had started           Expectation of life upon retirement                      ~ 14              ~ 16            ~ 20              ~ 33
                                                                       Passivity ratio-narrow (PR-N = years in
earlier, but gained acceleration in the post-FPC era.
                                                                        retirement/years of work)                               0.40              0.42            0.57              ~ 1.5
   Most public services directly impacting daily life are in the       Passivity ratio-broad (PR-B = non-earning
domain of the states, but a whittled down size of CG may not be         years/earning years)                                    0.97              1.00            1.29              ~ 2.3
able to provide the requisite level or quality of service for          Expectation of life figures relates to males. However, there are marked differences in life expectancy between
                                                                       males and females, and between rural and urban areas.
presently expanding population. Anecdotal evidence indicates
the growing incidence of ad hoc appointments encouraging infor-        Annexure B: Liberalisation of Retirement Benefits

malisation and largely directed at denial of social security and       Table 1 enlists some attributes reflecting liberalisation of rules governing
                                                                       retirement benefits. No rule signalling stringency could be deciphered.
retirement benefits. This creates more classes of employees than
                                                                       Table B1
envisaged, and obscures expenditures relating to employee
                                                                       Attribute                                  Pre-FPC Pensioner                     Post-FPC Pensioner
compensation in government service.
                                                                       Pension ceiling                            4,500 INR per month                   50% of highest pay
   The slowdown in new recruitment raises the average age of           Parity in respect of old pensioners No                                           50% of the revised scale for all
current workers. In addition, an improvement in life expectancy,       		                                                                               pensioners
beyond the age of retirement, adversely impacts the system             Gratuity ceiling                           2.5 lakh INR                          3.5 lakh INR
dependency ratio. For any given age of superannuation, maintain-       Gratuity calculation includes
                                                                       dearness allowance                         No                                    Yes
ing the number of employees, by hiring fresh recruits at the rate
                                                                       Commutation proportion                     one-third                             40%
of new retirees, may have an adverse impact on expenditure
                                                                       Dearness relief                            50%, partial relief for               100% neutralisation for all
towards employees’ compensation. Given the cornucopia of                                                          family pensioners                     penioners
retirement benefits (gratuity, leave encashment, commutation of        Family pension rate(s)                     Slabs of 30, 20 and 15%               Uniform 30%
pension, etc) rough estimates suggest that (deferred) compensa-        Family pension ceiling                     1,250 INR per month                   30% of pay for all categories
tion received in the first year of retirement exceeds thrice the       Dependant parents, widowed/ Not eligible for family                              “included in the definition of
final year salary compensation. Further, given the extant pay          divorced daughters          pension                                              family” for purpose of family
                                                                       		                                                                               pension
structure, it is likely that total wage compensation to a young
                                                                       Dearness relief for re-employed
entrant in a given group, may be less than compensation of a new       pensioners and employed family
retiree from that group.                                               pensioners                                 Not permitted                         Allowed
   The rules governing deferred compensation should be                 Medical allowance Nil                                                            100 INR for eligible
                                                                       		                                                                               pensioners not covered under
urgently amended incorporating favourable demographic                  		                                                                               CGHS
deve­lopments. In particular, extant full service stipulation of       Leave encashment                           up to 240 days                        up to 300 days
33  years appears to be redundant, when it is easily exceeded by       INR, Indian Rupees
                                                                       Source: GoI 2002.
the average (expected) working life. However, more debate
Economic & Political Weekly   EPW   february 16, 2008                                                                                                                                       57
speciAl article

should precede an upward revision of this stipulation, to                                 vulnerability in ensuring adequate provisioning for old age
incentivise service period contribution as also productivity and                          expenditure needs. Whether this holds incentive, to attract and
efficiency.                                                                               retain merit, appears questionable. The issue of inter-genera-
                                                                                          tional equity calls for some balance between current and deferred
Circumscribing Inequality                                                                 compensation. The maxim of “one-post one-pay” (or one-rank
In sharp contrast to the former defined benefit (DB) pension plan,                        one-pay) appears to be grossly violated not only between workers
new recruits in (non-military) government service from January                            and retirees, but also among current workers.
1, 2004, are members of a defined contribution (DC) pension plan.                            Responsible governments should ensure that those employed
Under the DC plan of the new pension system (NPS), individuals                            by them are empowered with sufficient financial capacity for a
mandatorily contribute 10 per cent of their pay, matched by an                            decent living. While there is little likelihood of a consensus on
equal contribution by government into an individual retirement                            a desirable ratio between the maximum and minimum pay
account. While employer’s contribution adds to government’s                               (disparity ratio), circumscribing inequality is desirable for
present expenditure, individual contribution lowers the net                               pragmatic reasons. The disparity ratio varied between 54.5 and
present remuneration of new recruits as compared to those in                              37.5 during the spell of the First Pay Commission, and was
service before January 1, 2004. This drives a wedge in current                            brought down to 10.7 by the Fourth Pay Commission [GoI 1973
compensation of present workers.                                                          and 1997]. The FPC retained this ratio, but care should be
   In the extant form deferred remuneration of new recruits is                            exercised that there ought to be sufficient disincentives to prevent
inadequately assured. Pre-funding strategy of the NPS, pending                            dilution in the hierarchical relationships for smooth functioning
the passage of the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development                                of government machinery (both, across public and private
Authority bill by Parliament, fails to ameliorate individual                              sectors, as well as within public sector).

Notes                                                        9 In several countries [Castel and Fox 2001] on the             Unit, Department of Expenditure, Ministry of
                                                               contrary, it is lower, for females, for example,              Finance, New Delhi.
1 Lifetime healthcare costs tend to cluster dispro-
                                                               Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Moldova.               – (1997): Report of the Fifth Central Pay Commis-
  portionately in a relatively brief period before
  death.                                                                                                                     sion, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi, January.
2 Several variants may be used while estimating             References                                                     – (2001): An Assessment of Government of India’s
  these ratios. For example, passivity ratio may be                                                                          Pensionary Liability, Ministry of Finance, p 8.
                                                            Anand, Mukesh (2007): ‘Pensions’ in Kaushik Basu (ed),         – (2002): Report of the High Level Expert Group on
  the ratio of the sum of years until joining the work
                                                                The Oxford Companion to Economics in India,                  Pensions, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.
  force and years in retirement, to number of work-
                                                                Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India, pp 391-94.
  ing years, dependency ratio may be the ratio of                                                                          – (2005): Statistical Abstract, India, 2004, Central
  non-earners to earners, replacement ratio may             Anand, Mukesh and Saswata Chaudhury (2007):                      Statistical Organisation, Ministry of Statistics
  be the ratio of net (of taxes) compensation during            ‘Government Employment and Employees’ Com-                   and Programme Implementation, New Delhi,
  non-working years to net compensation during                  pensation: Some Contours for the Sixth Central
                                                                                                                             October.
  working years, etc.                                           Pay Commission’, Economic & Political Weekly,
                                                                Volume XLII, No 31, August 4-10, pp 3225-32.               – (2001, 2005): Report Number 506 and 458,
3 The report of the High Level Expert Group [GoI                                                                             National Sample Survey Organisation, Ministry
  2002] also lamented that “This has resulted in en-        Castel, Paulette and Louise Fox (2001): ‘Gender Dimen-
                                                                                                                             of Statistics and Programme Implementation,
  hanced benefits than what a government servant is             sions of Pension Reforms in the Former Soviet
                                                                                                                             New Delhi.
  entitled to on retirement...”, especially in the con-         Union’, Ch 12 in Holzmann Robert and Joseph E
                                                                Stiglitz (eds), New Ideas About Old Age Security:         Muthuswamy, P and V Brinda (2002): Swamy’s
  text of restoration of commuted value of pensions,                                                                         Pension Compilation Incorporating CCS Pension
                                                                Towards Sustainable Pension Systems in the
  para 2.11, page 16, draft report of January 2002.                                                                          Rules, Swamy Publishers (P) Ltd.
                                                                21st Century, World Bank, Washington DC,
4 In the beginning of the 20th century, expectation             pp 424-51.                                                Nyce, Steven A and Sylester J Schieber (2005): The
  of life at birth, in India, was less than 25 years, al-                                                                    Economic Implications of Aging Societies: The Costs
                                                            Census of India (1961, 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001): Final
  most the same as at age 30. For nearly half a cen-                                                                         of Living Happily Ever After, Cambridge University
                                                                Population Totals, Registrar General and Census
  tury, expectation of life at age 20 was higher than                                                                        Press.
                                                                Commissioner, India.
  that at birth. Further, expectation of life, at all
                                                             – (2001): Population Projections for India and               Registrar General of India (2006): Statistical Report
  ages, registered a secular decline for nearly three
                                                                States  2001-26, Office of the Registrar General             2006, Sample Registration System, India.
  decades in the beginning of last century. The per-
  ilous situation was reversed only in the census of            and Census Commissioner, India.                           Unnithan, Sandeep (2007): ‘Defence: The Talent
  1931. Since then expectation of life, at all ages,        GoI (1973): Report of the Third Central Pay Commis-              Marches Out’, India Today, April 23, pp 34-36.
  has improved continually and significantly.                   sion, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi, March.              Whitehouse, Edward (2007): Pensions Panorama:
5 Broadly defined, passivity ratio constitutes sum of        – (1991): Brochure on Pay and Allowances of Central             Retirement-Income Systems in 53 Countries, World
  two phase components, one prior to entering la-               Government Civilian Employees, Pay Research                  Bank, Washington DC.
  bour force and another upon exiting from it. The
  latter component pertains to (prevalent) narrow
  definition.
6 This connotes a situation where people outlive
  savings cumulated during their income-earning
  years.
7 The ostensible rule for pension payments ensures            Unbound Back Volumes of Economic and Political Weekly from 1976 to 2007 are available.
  a monthly pension of 50 per cent of emoluments
  (calculated as average emoluments for last 10                                                                   Write to:
  months before retirement) upon completion of
  full service (currently stipulated at 33 years).
  However, this is likely an underestimate, as
                                                                                                      Circulation Department,
  Anand and Chaudhury (2007) show that support                                                  Economic and Political Weekly
  ratio (average pension/average salary) has risen
  rapidly from 38 per cent in 1990-91 to 56 per cent
                                                                                           Hitkari House, 284 Shahid Bhagat Singh Road,
  by 1999-2000.                                                                                           Mumbai 400 001.
8 Replacement ratio estimated as a ratio of cumu-
  lated net (of tax) receipts, during and prior to
                                                                                                      Circulation@epw.org.in
  retirement, is likely to be higher.

58                                                                                                                      february 16, 2008     EPW    Economic & Political Weekly
You can also read