Connecting "Evidenced Based" in What Works Clearinghouse to "Tiers of Evidence" in ESSA - March 4, 2021 - Nebraska ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Connecting “Evidenced Based” in What Works Clearinghouse to “Tiers of Evidence” in ESSA March 4, 2021 Douglas Van Dine Kristy Feden Lindsee Fryatt REL Central NeMTSS NeMTSS
REL Central: Who We Are The Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Central at Marzano Research serves the applied education research needs of Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. 2
Session Objectives • To reacquaint participants with What Works Clearinghouse and ESSA tiers of evidence. • To understand how to find evidence-based resources that align with the ESSA tiers. • To understand the importance of social construct data in identifying appropriate evidence-based resources.
What Is an Evidence-Based Program, Practice, or Activity? 1 • Program – “a packaged set of lessons and additional academic content used to teach a subject at a particular grade level or a branded intervention or product” (p. 45). • Practice – “a lesson or repeated instruction intended to introduce, develop, or improve a skill. A practice is not a branded intervention or product, but rather a method, approach, or strategy for teaching” (p. 45). • Activity – “what students are doing to learn and/or practice a skill, from engaging with a teacher during modeling, to supported practice and ultimately independent practice” (p. 45). 4
What Does “Levels of Evidence” Mean? Level of ESSA Definition2,3 WWC Practice Guide Recommendation3,4 Related WWC Ratings and Study Characterizations2,3 Evidence Supported by statistically Consistently supported by positive findings from Meets WWC standards without reservations under version significant and positive findings multiple studies that (1) include a well-designed and 2.1 or higher of the WWC Handbook, AND based on a Strong evidence from one or more well-designed well-implemented experimental study supporting causal large sample and a multisite sample. and well-implemented claims and (2) include participants who represent the experimental studies. students whom the strategy is intended to support. Supported by statistically Supported by positive findings from studies that use a Meets WWC standards with or without reservations under significant and positive findings well-implemented quasi-experimental design, or by one version 2.1 or higher of the WWC Handbook, AND based Moderate from one or more well-designed or more studies using an experimental design that may on a large sample and a multisite sample. evidence and well-implemented quasi- not include participants who represent the students whom experimental design studies. the strategy is intended to support. Supported by statistically Any recommendation with a “strong” or “moderate” Does not meet WWC standards, OR ineligible for WWC significant and positive findings rating can provide promising evidence, regardless of review, OR not reviewed under version 2.1 or higher of the Promising from one or more correlational whether the guide was prepared under version 2.1 or WWC Handbook, OR based on a sample that is not a large evidence studies with statistical controls higher of the WWC Handbook. sample and a multisite sample. for selection bias. Demonstrates a Supported by theory that is Supported by strong theory or descriptive research Does not meet WWC standards, OR ineligible for WWC rationale / informed by research or program indicating that the strategy may result in positive review, OR does not include a statistically significant and Minimal evaluation. outcomes, or at least is needed to support the other positive finding. evidence practice recommendations. 7
WWC and ESSA Tiers • https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/FWW 11
WWC and ESSA Tiers (cont.) 12
WWC and ESSA Tiers (cont.) 13
WWC and ESSA Tiers (cont.) Note: To be identified as an ESSA Tier 1 intervention, the sample size used in the study must be 350 or larger. This study only included 79 students. However, when combined with other studies also reporting favorable results and containing more students, this study satisfies the large sample requirement for Tier 1 / Strong Evidence of positive effects. 14
WWC and ESSA Tiers (cont.) 15
Check for Understanding • A school district in your region has asked you about a supplemental math program called Fraction Face-off! • What ESSA tier does the evidence support? How do you know? 16
NeMTSS 17
Shared Leadership Communication, Evidence-Based Collaboration & Partnerships Practices Building Capacity & Infrastructure Layered Continuum Data-Based Problem-Solving for Implementation of Supports & Decision-Making
WWC Practice Guides 22
WWC Practice Guides • Publications of the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) and WWC. • Designed to give educators specific recommendations on classroom practices based on evidence and shown to support student learning. • Based on reviews of research in addition to experiences of practitioners and panels of nationally recognized experts. • https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/21 23
WWC Practice Guides: ESSA Alignment • https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/FWW 24
WWC Practice Guides: ESSA Alignment (cont.) 25
WWC Elementary Practice Guides: ESSA Alignment 26
WWC Secondary Practice Guides: ESSA Alignment 27
How Do I Use Social Construct Data to Determine the Appropriateness of an Evidence-Based Resource? 28
WWC and ESSA Tiers • https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/FWW 29
WWC and ESSA Tiers (cont.) 30
WWC Intervention Reports: Evidence Snapshot 31
WWC Intervention Reports: Evidence Snapshot (cont.) 32
WWC Reviews of Studies 33
WWC Reviews of Studies (cont.) 34
WWC Practice Guide Appendices: Rationale for Evidence Ratings 5 35
Check for Understanding (part 2) • Returning to the school district in your region that asked you about a supplemental math program called Fraction Face-off! • What information might you share with this district about how the social construct data supports working with students in the district? 36
Thank You Please visit our website and follow us on Twitter for information about our events, priorities, and alliances, and for access to our many free resources. ies.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/central/index.asp @RELCentral Or contact us at RELCentral@MarzanoResearch.com This presentation was prepared under Contract ED-IES-17-C-0005 by Regional Educational Laboratory Central, administered by Marzano Research. The content does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of IES or the U.S. Department of Education, nor does mention of names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 37
April Session • How do you have these critical conversations with your schools and districts regarding these levels of evidence and the use of materials? – What are the challenges? How have you overcome these challenges? – Once you are invited, how do you present information that is salient to them but also pushes them to do more? – How do you make these decisions in the absence of data? 38
References 1. Ohio Department of Education. (2020). Ohio’s plan to raise literacy achievement. http://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Learning-in-Ohio/Literacy 2. U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Non-regulatory guidance: Using evidence to strengthen education investments. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/guidanceuseseinvestment.pdf 3. Definitions and Selection Criteria That Apply to Direct Grant Programs, 82 F.R. 35445 (proposed July 31, 2017) (to be codified at 34 C.F.R. §§ 75, 77). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/07/31/2017- 15989/definitions-and-selection-criteria-that-apply-to-direct-grant-programs 4. Institute of Education Sciences. (2017, April 11). Teaching strategies for improving algebra knowledge in middle and high school students: Levels of evidence [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27poYdVXQUk 5. Graham, S., Bruch, J., Fitzgerald, J., Friedrich, L., Furgeson, J., Greene, K., Kim, J., Lyskawa, J., Olson, C. B., & Smither Wulsin, C. (2016). Teaching secondary students to write effectively (NCEE 2017–4002). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/22 39
You can also read