Comparative 6th Year English Higher Level Michael Ruaidhri Deasy & Gavin Cowzer - The Dublin School of Grinds

Page created by Aaron Carter
 
CONTINUE READING
Comparative 6th Year English Higher Level Michael Ruaidhri Deasy & Gavin Cowzer - The Dublin School of Grinds
th
                   6 Year
                    English
                 Higher Level
            Michael Ruaidhri Deasy
               & Gavin Cowzer
                     Comparative
                       Part 1

No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced or transmitted in any form or
by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without
prior written permission from The Dublin School of Grinds.

Ref: 6/eng /h/mrd/ Comparative Part 1
Comparative 6th Year English Higher Level Michael Ruaidhri Deasy & Gavin Cowzer - The Dublin School of Grinds
EASTER
    REVISION
    COURSES
    Looking to maximise                                                         EASTER REVISION COURSE FEES:
                                                                                       6TH YEAR COURSES
    your CAO points?                                                                    PRICE           TOTAL           SAVINGS
                                                                   1st Course            €295            €295               -
    Easter is a crucial time for students to vastly improve
    on the points that they received in their mock exams.          2nd Course           FREE             €295             €295
    To help students take advantage of this valuable               3rd Course            €100            €395             €490
    time, The Dublin School of Grinds is running intensive,
    exam-focused Easter Revision Courses. Each course              4th Course            €100            €495             €685
    runs for five days (90 minutes per day). All courses           5th Course            €100            €595             €880
    take place in Stillorgan, Co. Dublin.                          6th Course            €100            €695            €1,075
    The focus of these courses is to maximise students’            7th Course            €100            €795            €1,270
    CAO points.                                                    8th Course            €100            €895            €1,465
                                                                                   3RD & 5TH YEAR COURSES
                          SPECIAL OFFER                                                 PRICE           TOTAL           SAVINGS
      BUY 1 COURSE GET A 2ND COURSE FREE
                                                                   1st Course            €245            €245               -
           To avail of this offer, early booking is required
                                                                   2nd Course           FREE             €245             €245
               as courses were fully booked last year.
                                                                   3rd Course            €50             €295             €440
                                                                   4th Course            €50             €345             €635
    What do students get at these                                  5th Course            €50             €395             €830

    courses?                                                       6th Course            €50             €445            €1,025

      99 90 minutes of intensive tuition per day for five
         days with Ireland’s leading teachers.                         20% SIBLING DISCOUNT AVAILABLE.
      99 Comprehensive study notes.                                     Please call 01 442 4442 to avail of this discount.

      99 A focus on simple shortcuts to raise students’
         grades and exploit the critically important                    FREE DAILY BUS SERVICE
         marking scheme.
                                                                    FROM CITY CENTRE TO STILLORGAN
      99 Access to a free supervised study room.                   For full information on our Easter bus service, see 3 pages ahead.

     NOTE: These courses are built on the fact that there              To book, call us on 01 442 4442 or book
     are certain predicable trends that reappear over and
                                                                        online at www.dublinschoolofgrinds.ie
     over again in the State Examinations.

                                                               2

DSOG Easter 2018 8pg A4 FINAL PRINT.indd 2                                                                                      02/02/2018 14:37
The Comparative Study

Introduction and approach……….………………………………………3-15

      Overview and modes of comparison

      How to compare

      Basic paragraph structure and checklist

Cultural Context ..……………………………………………….……..…16-24

General Vision/Viewpoint……………………………………………..…25-34

Literary Genre……………………………………………..…………..….35-47

Exemplar material……………………………………………………….48-56

Sample Answers

Exemplar Material

©The Dublin School of Grinds        2           Deasy & Cowzer
The Comparative Study

The comparative study question is worth 70 marks. 17.5% of your total result.

You should spend 70 minutes on this section. 10 minutes planning and 60
minutes writing.

You will have a choice of 4 questions. You will pick one.

Aim to write a minimum of 5A4 pages

The main thing to remember for this section is you are being tested on your
ability to plan and structure an answer in which you compare the three texts
you have studied, not on how well you know the texts.

You should study the three texts concentrating on the three modes of
comparison:

©The Dublin School of Grinds             3                        Deasy & Cowzer
The Comparative Modes for Examination in 2018 are:

Higher Level                (i)     Cultural Context

                            (ii)    General Vision/Viewpoint

                            (iii)   Literary Genre

For each of these areas you should have 3/4 key moments from each text that
demonstrate the points you have to make about these areas.

As with all sections the most important thing is to answer the question directly
and clearly. Avoid summarizing the story and ensure you always engage with
the question and texts- personalize it and make it interesting.

©The Dublin School of Grinds              4                        Deasy & Cowzer
HOW TO COMPARE
A note of caution:

A number of approaches have been put forward as frameworks as to how
exactly this is meant to be done. This may mean that your teacher has
advocated a very rigid framework within which they expect you to write. It is
possible that from your own research you have been hearing contradictory
messages about how this is meant to be done. The confusion that surrounds
this is a reflection of the gradual shifts that have occurred in how this course is
to be approached.

Until recently examiners were asked to expect a comparison in every
paragraph. This meant that in a single paragraph you were expected to refer
to all three texts. This meant that any in depth reading of moments in a text
meant that paragraphs were running to a page and a half in length.

This really rigid framework has been loosened more recently. Examiners have
been told to accept students separating different texts into different
paragraphs as long as there are clear links being developed.

Skip a line when moving on to a new point. This is a very strong paragraph
break and will signal to your examiner that you wish to look at another aspect
of the question or that you are moving to another text but staying on the same
point.

©The Dublin School of Grinds              5                           Deasy & Cowzer
o You must link the texts in every paragraph. Unless you are starting a
      new point/section in your comparative in which case your first
      paragraph refers back to the question. The next two paragraphs for the
      other two texts begin with links. (This is if you are doing all three texts
      in one essay – the 70 mark essay- and are happy to give each text its
      own paragraph).

   o If comparing two texts in one paragraph use connectives to move
      between texts. E.G. Similarly

   o If you write about one text in one paragraph and then move to a
      sifferent text in the next paragraph it is crucial that your opening line of
      the second paragraph begins with a linking sentence (This is similar
      to… or This stands in contrast to…).

   o When comparing you should look at the similarities (compare) and the
      differences (contrast). Both are valid.

   o When comparing two texts using linking language you may be able to
      deal with two texts in one paragraph. This is appropriate if the question
      asks you to deal with one text alone (30 mark) and compare and
      contrast your other two texts.

   o When comparing all three texts it may be appropriate to deal with how
      two texts are similar in one paragraph before moving onto a second
      paragraph to deal with how the third text stands in contrast to the first
      two texts. This second paragraph will use one of the linking phrases
      below as the opening line to make the comparison explicit.

©The Dublin School of Grinds             6                           Deasy & Cowzer
The Key Moment:

This is the single most important aspect to sorting out your comparative. In
your Single text (probably Shakespeare) you are expected to quote liberally
as you make your points. As you can also be asked how the author uses
language to tell the story this is even more important.

With the comparative this need to quote is not really there. It can help to add
authority to your answers but it is not a requirement.

For example in an essay on the theme of the influence of the past on the
present the following quotation might be helpful: "So we beat on, boats
against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past." This is the final line
of the novel and as Fitzgerald’s last words deserves to be given due
consideration. Check the final description image in all of your texts. What is
the final idea the author wished to convey. Is it uplifting? As it is the final line it
is menat to resonate and last in the reader’s memory.

However the quote in itself is not as useful as explaining the context of the
line. The context is the key moment. This allows you to consider the
meaning of a moment within the context of the novel thereby showing an in
depth consideration of the novel as a whole. This will add to the body of the
essay. In other words use the key moment to look at the piece as a whole.

©The Dublin School of Grinds                7                            Deasy & Cowzer
Worked Example:

In ‘T.G.G.’ Fitzgerald explores how we, as human beings, are created by our
experiences. It is the influence of these moments within our pasts that shape
us as human beings. In the final moment of the novel Nick Carraway our
narrator meets Tom Buchanan on 5th avenue in New York. Tom is described
as stopping and looking into the windows of a jewelry store. Tom knows that
he has been lessened in Nick’s eyes by his treatment of Gatsby. Nick tells us
that he initially refuses but finally shakes Tom’s hand but it is clear that he
holds him in contempt. Fitzgerald shows that the events leading to Gatsby’s
death will continue to haunt both men. Tom does not accept responsibility for
telling Wilson where Gatsby lived thereby causing his death. His selfishness is
made evident that he can only see the effect on himself of the events
surrounding Gatsby’s death. The fact that Tom is seen as looking into the
windows of the jewelry store is in my opinion crucial to understanding the
message of the novel. We know that Tom used his wealth to convince Daisy
to marry him by buying her a string of pearls valued at $350,000. Fitzgerald is
suggesting, in my opinion, that Tom will continue to act selfishly and will
refuse to learn from his experience and is again looking for an expensive gift
for the mistress he has found to replace Myrtle Wilson. Although clearly
emotionally affected by his experiences Tom has refused to learn from them.
Nick however has come to understand the emptiness at the heart of the lives
of the super-rich during the Jazz age. Because of this Nick rejects the society
he had hoped to join and leaves New York.

Once this key moment has been examined in depth the key is then move to
another key moment in one of your other texts that is either comparable or
that stands in contrast to this one while staying focused on the same theme.

©The Dublin School of Grinds            8                          Deasy & Cowzer
Linking Language:
In order to make sure that you are staying focused on making comparisons
you should try to use some of the following phrases in your answer:

When making connections between similar aspects of texts:

   o I noticed in both x and y that…

   o This situation in x is very like the part in y where…

   o Joe in x reminds me of Mary in y where he says…because he
      does…because they both…

   o This way of thinking/behaving is typical of both x and y.

   o When we turn to y again we see/find…

   o In much the same way…

   o Character x behaves in much the same manner.

When recognizing differences between texts:

   o However, in y

   o …. unlike what happens/ transpires in X

   o What a contrast to X where…

   o This stands in marked contrast to …

   o X differs from y in that….

   o X shows us…whereas y…

©The Dublin School of Grinds             9                        Deasy & Cowzer
When showing that similarities/differences need to be
qualified/explained:

   o This situation also crops up in y, but things work out differently…

   o Although x and y deal with a similar theme, x treats it tragically but y
      treats it more light-heartedly.

   o X and y deal with similar problems, but x’s world is very different to y’s

   o In both texts, you see into the hero’s mind; in x this is done through first
      person narrative, whereas in y…

   o X and y both deal with…but they offer strongly contrasting points.

                 Other phrases/words to use/ Connectives:

Contrast: On the other hand, however, whereas, in comparison to, in contrast
to, meanwhile,

Comparison: Similarly, also, comparably, In common, I noticed in both….

©The Dublin School of Grinds             10                         Deasy & Cowzer
Linking words help you to connect ideas and sentences, so that people can
follow your ideas. This will aid your coherence mark.

Giving examples
For example
For instance
Namely

Adding information
And                                          Furthermore
In addition                                  Moreover
As well as                                   Apart from
Also                                         In addition to
Too                                          Besides

Summarising

In short                                     To summarise
In brief                                     To conclude
In summary                                   In conclusion
Sequencing ideas

The former, … the latter
Firstly, secondly, finally                   Lastly
The first point is                           The following

Giving a reason

Due to / due to the fact that                Because of
Owing to / owing to the fact that            Since
Because                                      As

Giving a result/Conclusion

©The Dublin School of Grinds            11                     Deasy & Cowzer
Therefore
So                                             This means that
Consequently                                   As a result

Contrasting ideas
But
However
Although / even though
Despite / despite the fact that
In spite of / in spite of the fact that
Unlike
In theory… in practice
Nevertheless
Nonetheless
While
Whereas …

©The Dublin School of Grinds              12                     Deasy & Cowzer
Basic paragraph structure of your comparative essay

    Point answering the question or linking to previous paragraph as comparison or
     contrast.
    Key moments which demonstrate the point you have made in this paragraph.
     Explain how evidence backs point being made. (Either establishing how text 1
     shows point of make comparison to text 1 in precious paragraph)
    Personal engagement/thoughts on the point/key moment.

                          Comparative Study Checklist

        o Plan your answer carefully.

        o Never tell the story.

        o Always check the question before you begin…are you answering all
          parts?

        o Always answer the question asked.

        o Always compare.

        o Always engage with the texts.

        o Always use key moments to demonstrate your points.

  NOTE: You will be rewarded for engaging with the texts. This means you should
always mention what your opinion is/what you think/how your opinion changed after
                             studying the texts etc.

           It is important you do this as well as just comparing the texts!

 ©The Dublin School of Grinds            13                          Deasy & Cowzer
What the examiners are saying:
“The Comparative Study is one of the areas where candidates have an opportunity to
demonstrate skills in critical literacy. It is possible for candidates to challenge, wholly
or in part, not only the premise put forward in questions but also the views and
opinions they encountered in the course of studying texts. Many candidates showed
evidence of critical engagement with the texts they had studied and a mature critical
literacy was seen in the work of some candidates. Examiners were pleased when they
saw candidates trust in their own personal response and demonstrate a willingness to
challenge the ‘fixed meaning’ of texts. The best answers managed to remain
grounded, both in the question asked and in the text. Examiners reported that
examples of under-achievement in the area of comparative studies could often be
attributed to a loss of focus in terms of the requirements of the task. Some candidates
did not show evidence of ‘reading’ in an astute and reflective manner. The quality of
evidence cited to support an opinion was a significant discriminator used by
examiners.”

How can we demonstrate to the examiner that we have critically engaged?

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds              14                          Deasy & Cowzer
Narrative writing- Elements of Narrative
Summary/Self-Test – Refer to Paper 1-Part 1 Narrative writing handout

The language of storytelling:

A narrative is a description of a sequence of events. The two types of narrative
structure are…

A narrator is a storyteller. The two types of narrator are…

ALL NARRATIVES MUST HAVE

•       C= Character revealed through 4 main techniques/methods?

:

•       S= Setting- Quality description uses three techniques?

•       P = Plot Drama is created by?

•       T = Theme- Definition

Think about how a writer

Introduces and develops a character- allows us to relate to the characters

Creates/describes a setting – this will affect characters attitudes and behaviours

Moves the plot forward – central to sustaining our interest in narrative

Challenges the reader to question the ideas explored in the text. What ideas or issues
are explored? What attitudes are revealed?

    ©The Dublin School of Grinds           15                          Deasy & Cowzer
THE CULTURAL CONTEXT
This section is asking you to study the society of the text, what it would be like to
live there, and how the society affected the main characters.

This section looks at the effect of the society on characters. Essentially you are
being asked how does the setting influence the characters and the plot line. What
does it contribute to our understaning of the main themes of the text.

A useful way of looking for the importance of the Cultural context is to ask yourself
in what way does the setting impose limitations on characters.

This is one of the most important ways that the cultural context helps to shape the
General Vision of a text. It a character is placed in opposition to the prevailing
moral codes of their society how does it affect how we feel? It all depends on who
we have sympathy for?

Think about the differences between:
Dublin today, Dublin 30 years ago and Delhi today.
What ways are the characters’ lives affected by the world that they inhabit.

©The Dublin School of Grinds           16                          Deasy & Cowzer
When revising this mode ask the following questions:
      What would it be like to live there?
       What parts of the world made you feel uncomfortable? What elements were
       particularly pertinent to me as a young man or woman?

      What are the rules and customs of this society?
       To what extent was the rule of law or the state evident? Does society police
       itself? In what key moments is this made eveident?

      Who has power in this society/who makes the rules?
       Does money/wealth confer power? How far is this true of our world? Is social
       class important in dictating who has/ has not power?

      What are the roles of men and women in this society?
       Consider gender in terms of relationships. Romantic/ Parental/ Friendships.
       Does CC unite or prevent characters from forming positive relationships?
  ©The Dublin School of Grinds                17                     Deasy & Cowzer
   Is family important?
       To what extent are characters fulfilled by the relationships with family?

      How does the society affect how the characters behave? Are they forced to
       rebel? How does this make you feel? Did they succeed within society or are
       they forced to leave?

      How do the characters socialise? Are characters able to form relationships
       quickly or easily?

Thinking ahead to your comparative essay, the points you may base paragraphs on
may come from:

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds              18                         Deasy & Cowzer
Paragraphs/points to raise and compare when looking at a society

•       Isolation/community

•       Class

•       Morality

•       Gender

•       Economics/money

•       Power

•       Conflict- war, violence etc.

.       Crime, punishment, law and order

    ©The Dublin School of Grinds           19                 Deasy & Cowzer
©The Dublin School of Grinds   20   Deasy & Cowzer
Aspect      What is it like to live there?   Rules/customs

                                 Text 1

©The Dublin School of Grinds
                                 Text 2

21
                                 Text 3

                                    My
                               thoughts/fe
                                  elings

Deasy & Cowzer
Roles of men and women?

                          ©The Dublin School of Grinds   22   Deasy & Cowzer
Aspect      Who exerts power
                                             and how do they do it?

                                 Text 1

©The Dublin School of Grinds
                                 Text 2

23
                                 Text 3

                                    My
                               thoughts/fe
                                  elings

Deasy & Cowzer
Aspect      Family/social units

                                             The characters behaviour and how it is affected by society

                                 Text 1

©The Dublin School of Grinds
                                 Text 2

24
                                 Text 3

                                    My
                               thoughts/fe
                                  elings

Deasy & Cowzer
GENERAL VISION/VIEWPOINT
   From Examiner guidelines: “The term, The General Vision and Viewpoint, may
   be understood by candidates to mean the broad outlook of the authors of the texts
   and/or of the texts themselves as interpreted and understood by the reader.”

   The general vision/viewpoint therefore is either, or a combination, of two things:

   1. The overall feeling that the text creates in the reader/viewer.

   2. The main idea/attitude the author/director is trying to create.

It is important to be clear as to what the general vision and viewpoint of the text is but
also to deal with ‘how’ the vision is communicated.

The key therefore is to look at the insights that the author offers on life through their
exploration of the various aspects of narrative. (C+S+P=T) You will find that much of
the same material that you have prepared for the theme question can be applied here.
However you must maintain focus on your emotional response.

For example you have prepared the theme of the past influencing the present and
you have key moments that show this as being a preoccupation of the authors you
have read. You can then adapt this to the G.V. question by considering the effect that
this moment is intended to have on the reader and more particularly on you. If a
character succeeds in transcending a past experience and achieves personal
development we will feel uplifted. If the character fails we will feel downcast.

“Fitzgerald presents us with a very pessimistic view on life. This is most clearly seen in
the number of instances he shows characters trapped by their past. Many of the
characters in the novel are deeply psychologically scarred by their experiences.”

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds              25                          Deasy & Cowzer
Preperation:
      The key is to look at the opening of all three texts.
   Ask yourself what is the dominant emotion you feel?

      Look for 2 further key moments per text that reveal the authors development
       of the general vision.

      Finally consider the endings of the three texts.
   Did the feeling at the beginning of the novel change? Did central character
   succeed? Do you think of the people and the world in a more positive light having
   read the text? Did you disagree with the author’s outlook?

It can be helpful to stay focused on a central theme and focus on the authors attitude
towards that theme. Do they think that people can overcome their past/ overcome
class prejudice/ succeed in creating an identity for themselves that they are
comfortable with?

V.V.N.B. The risk here is that your examiner thinks that you are writing a pre
prepared answer for theme and not adapting it sufficiently. To avoid this you
must keep returning to the emotional effect of the text on you as a reader. In
order to do this use the synonyms given below throughout your essay.

Linking language is as above.

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds             26                         Deasy & Cowzer
When revising this mode ask the following questions:

   What general feeling are you left with at the end of the text?
Was this how you expected the text to end?
Did the text start with the character in a bad situation and then show him or her
succeeding in overcoming these obstacles or was it the opposite?

   What aspects of the text made you feel this way at the end of the text?
Did a character you connected with fail or succeed?

   What aspects of life do the authors/directors concentrate on? And why? What are
    they trying to show about life? These themes will often reflect the general vision? If
    an author is preoccupied with our inability to move beyond our social class/ gender
    role/ past experience that would reflect a negative G.V.

   What images stay with you most strongly? Concentrate on opening and closing
    images? Do they reflect the narrative trajectory? (Things start well and finish badly
    of start badly and finish well)

    ©The Dublin School of Grinds            27                          Deasy & Cowzer
   What in your view were the key moments? These can be small moments that you
    identify as being major shifts in the story? Think about how an author might try and
    reflect that a moment can change a characters life.

   Is the central vision of the text light or dark at the start of the novel? Are the central
    characters hopeful/Optimistic as the text starts? Are there hints that the plot will
    destroy central character? (Sense of foreboding/ Foreshadowing)

   Is the central vision consistent throughout the text or does it change?

   What, do you think, is the author’s view of his/her characters? Is the author
    sympathetic to all the characters? Does he have a character or characters who

    ©The Dublin School of Grinds              28                           Deasy & Cowzer
represent    a   way   of   behaving   that   the   author   wishes    to   portray    as
    offensive/immoral?

   How is the general vision/viewpoint articulated through the characters? How do
    characters express their own outlook on life? Does this reflect how the author
    feels?

   What happens if you compare the author’s presentations of the characters in two
    or more texts?

    ©The Dublin School of Grinds            29                            Deasy & Cowzer
Some helpful synonyms:

Optimistic Pessimistic

Positive Negative

Light Dark

Hopeful Disheartening

Encouraging Discouraging

Cheerful Depressing

Demoralising

The opening sequence of the play is largely optimistic.

I felt that the treatment of the father son relationship was negative throughout the
novel.

The author offers us an encouraging vision of how individuals can grow and develop.

I found the ending of the Film to be hugely encouraging. The central character has
achieved personal growth and is now in a position to make a positive contribution.

What a depressing ending to the play. Our central character cannot achieve growth
within this cultural context but instead must leave. However a glimmer of hope is
offered to the viewer by…

This was a truly uplifting ending to the text.

The author left me feeling demoralized at the end of the novel.

In contrast to this a much more cheerful outlook can be seen in … .

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds               30                        Deasy & Cowzer
Aspect      Outlook on life.                                 Attitude to characters and dilemmas they face. Is the text
                                             Is the text optimistic or pessimistic? Does it   compassionate or not? Are the characters close or distant?
                                             celebrate or lament the human condition?

                                 Text 1

©The Dublin School of Grinds
                                 Text 2

31
                                 Text 3

                                    My
                               thoughts/fe
                                  elings

Deasy & Cowzer
Aspect     Moral ambivalence: does the text leave certain   Moral stance: does the text support/condemn certain
                                           issues unresolved/undecided?                     actions/values/characters?

                                Text 1

©The Dublin School of Grinds
                                Text 2

32
                                Text 3

                                   My
                               thoughts/
                                feelings

Deasy & Cowzer
Aspect         Your own personal response to the   Reflection of the time in which it was created; is the
                                                   vision and viewpoint.                text time bound or does it have relevance today?

                                    Text 1

©The Dublin School of Grinds
                                    Text 2

33
                                    Text 3

                                     My
                               thoughts/feelings

Deasy & Cowzer
Aspect           Important key moments which demonstrate points made above.

                                      Text 1

©The Dublin School of Grinds
                                      Text 2

34
                                      Text 3

                               My thoughts/feelings

Deasy & Cowzer
LITERARY GENRE
                               The way in which a story is told

You need to focus on a variety of vehicles/techniques through which stories might be
carried:

Characterisation - character groupings, costume, casting, description, lighting, facial
expression, close up, narrative voice- perspective, use of dialogue, monologue,
soliloquy, aside, incidental detail,

Setting - imagery and symbol, music, colour, lighting, pathetic fallacy, landscape,
backdrop, stage,

Plot-line - dramatic techniques, flashbacks linear/ non-linear, tension, suspense,
conflict (internal/external) resolution (epilogue?), narrative framing

This mode of comparison asks you to demonstrate an in depth understanding of how
stories work. Do you understand narrative writing? What adds to the interest is that
you are doing so across different forms.

Your examiner will be impressed if:

   1. You show that different forms can achieve the same goal using different
      techniques. Show your examiner you have considered the important aspects of
      the different narrative forms.

   2. You can communicate that despite using different forms stories have some
      things in common especially if they are from the same broad style or genre.

From the examiner’s guidelines:

   1.   “Indicate aspects of the narrative which they found significant

and attempt to explain fully the meaning thus generated.”(DES English Syllabus 4.4.1.)

   2. “Outline the structure of the narrative and how it achieves

coherence within its genre.”

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds                  35                            Deasy & Cowzer
Genre: (Style or category) A literary genre is a category of literary composition.

Genre is a label that characterizes elements a reader can expect in a work of
literature. The major forms of literature can be written in various genres. Genre is a
category characterized by similarities in style, or subject matter

Genres may be determined by literary technique, tone, content, or even (as in the
case of fiction- Novella/Short Story) length. The distinctions between genres and
categories are flexible and loosely defined, often with subgroups.

Often teachers will choose three texts that are unified by a single theme as opposed
to fitting into one genre. Your texts do not need to be from the same genre to be
compared. Remember contrasts are a valid way of making comparison. (E.G.
Comparing memoir to historical fiction could reveal interesting differences in
interpretation.) Different genres will focus on different elements of narrative. (Thriller
will focus on plot, Coming of age will focus on character change).

Some helpful genres:

      Tragedy,
      Comedy,
      Romance,
      Literary fiction - any fiction that attempts to engage with one or more truths or
       questions, hence relevant to a broad scope of humanity as a form of
       expression
      Historical,
      Psychological drama,
      Historical fiction – story with fictional characters and events in a historical
       setting
      Horror – fiction in which events evoke a feeling of dread and sometimes fear in
       both the characters and the reader
      Bildungsroman (novel of formation, novel of education, or coming-of-age story)
       literary genre that focuses on the psychological and moral growth of the
       protagonist from youth to adulthood (coming of age), in which character change
       and identity formation is extremely important.
      Drama– stories composed in verse or prose, usually for theatrical performance,
       where conflicts and emotion are expressed through dialogue and action

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds               36                           Deasy & Cowzer
   Biography/autobiography– narrative of a person's life; a true story about a real
    person
   Memoir– factual story that focuses on a significant relationship between the
    writer and a person, place, or object; reads like a short novel
   Narrative nonfiction/personal narrative– factual information about a significant
    event presented in a format which tells a story

©The Dublin School of Grinds             37                           Deasy & Cowzer
When revising this section ask yourself the following questions:

         What category or genre does the text belong to? What are the
          characteristics that define this genre? You may need to research this if it is
          not included below.

         What are the differences between reading a novel, watching a film or
          attending a play? How does this change the audience’s experience?

         What are the similarities between reading a novel, watching a film or
          attending a play? What is it that interests us about stories? How is it that we
          can suspend our disbelief?

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds             38                          Deasy & Cowzer
   How does a novelist or short story writer tell a story differently from a
        playwright or a director? What elements needed to be focused on? Are
        there any advantages to this?

       Who is narrating the story? What point of view is it being told from? Does
        this remain constant within your text? How does this affect your relationship
        with the characters?

       What are the characters like? How are they described or portrayed? Focus
        on characterization. Think about how the characters are revealed? Can you
        see the same characteristic in characters across your three texts? Is this
        characteristic communicated in the same way? Actions?

       Compare the style of writing or directing in each text. Which do you prefer?
        Are you aware of the author? Does the writer draw attention to the story
        telling? Was it naturalistic?

©The Dublin School of Grinds             39                         Deasy & Cowzer
   How is imagery used? Especially Pathetic fallacy?

       How is atmosphere created and communicated? Choose key moments and
        consider atmosphere (emotion).

       How are the texts organised/structured? Chronologically/ flashbacks? What
        is the advantage of the different narrative structure used by the authors?

       What is the tone of each text? What is the overarching emotion? How is this
        conveyed/

©The Dublin School of Grinds           40                         Deasy & Cowzer
LITERARY GENRE   Genre of the text   How a novel/play/film tells its   Type of Text
                                                                               story

©The Dublin School of Grinds
                                   TEXT 1

41
                                   TEXT 2

                                   TEXT 3

                                 My thoughts/

                                 Reflections/

                                   Opinion.

Deasy & Cowzer
                                                                                                                     When revising you should fill out the box below to gather your ideas and points.
LITERA                           Narrator   Characteristics of the genre
                                 RY
                                          Narrative Structure
                               GENRE

©The Dublin School of Grinds
                               TEXT 1

42
                               TEXT 2

                               TEXT 3

                                 My
                               thought
                                  s/

                               Reflecti

Deasy & Cowzer
                                ons/

                               Opinion
                                  .
LITERARY       Main imagery patterns   Characterisation
                                GENRE

©The Dublin School of Grinds
                                 TEXT 1

43
                                 TEXT 2

                                 TEXT 3

                                   My
                                thoughts/

                               Reflections/

                                Opinion.

Deasy & Cowzer
LITERARY                                                 Tone of the piece
                                GENRE
                                              Key moments which demonstrate the above
                                                              points

©The Dublin School of Grinds
                                 TEXT 1

44
                                 TEXT 2

                                 TEXT 3

                                   My
                                thoughts/

                               Reflections/

                                Opinion.

Deasy & Cowzer
Things to mention during the comparative study answer:

When referring to a novel:

          o Plot

          o Character

          o Setting

          o Atmosphere

          o Description

          o Dialogue

When referring to a play:

              o All of the above

              o Acting

              o Background

              o Props

              o Lighting

              o Movement on stage

When referring to a film:

          o All of the above

          o Mis-en-scene (everything in the frame)

          o Camera angles and position

          o Special effects

          o Sound and music

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds           45                   Deasy & Cowzer
WHAT THE COMPARATIVE QUESTIONS WILL FOCUS ON

   1. Your understanding of each mode

   2. How each mode is demonstrated in the text

   3. How the mode affects your enjoyment/understanding of the text

   4. How each mode is demonstrated through key moments.

                           What exactly is a key moment?

A key moment is a specific part of the text that you use to prove your point.

A key moment should be detailed and specific.

Typical key moments to study:

      The opening and closing scenes of the text
      A major turning point for the central character.
      Moments which you think demonstrate the writer/director’s skill.

                                     FINAL TIPS:

             o Compare in every paragraph

             o Engage with the texts- I thought, I noticed, it changed my opinion, I
               learnt, I now believe etc.

             o Always demonstrate your points using a key moment.

             o 1 point per paragraph- show how this point is dealt with in at least
               two of your texts then move on to next paragraph and next point.

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds             46                          Deasy & Cowzer
Reminder- 10 steps on how to plan and prepare:
    1. Write out the question
    2. Underline the key words.
    3. Ask yourself what is the question asking you to express an opinion on?
    4. Mind map the key words.
    5. Decide on your opinion- what are you going to argue?
    6. Organise your points- how will you prove your argument/opinion?
    7. What proof (quotes/key moments) will you use?
    8. Layout your paragraphs
    9. Get writing.
    10. Remember PQE and always check your points prove your opinion.

©The Dublin School of Grinds          47                         Deasy & Cowzer
SAMPLE ANSWERS
Every year the text prescribed for the Comparative Study change. There are also a
huge number of combinations that can be picked. The sample answers below are
included to help you understand the structure and shape of a comparative answer.
Look out for how the candidate focuses on the question and regularly makes
comparative points, backed up by clear key moments.

The General Vision and Viewpoint
‘Each text we read presents us with an outlook on life that may be bright or
dark, or a combination of brightness and darkness.’

In the light of the above statement, compare the general vision and viewpoint in
at least two texts you have studied in your comparative course. (70)

For the purpose of this essay I will be comparing The Playboy of the Western World
by JM Synge (PB), Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë (WH) and Strictly Ballroom
directed by Baz Luhrmann (SB). In each of the three texts the characters are faced by
trials and tribulation of life. It is through their dealing with them that we are presented
with a dark or bright outlook on life.

In (PB) the overall outlook on life is dark. The characters are unkind, uncaring and
selfish. Although there is a bright patch in the love affair of Pegeen Mike and Christy
Mahon and also many humourous moments we can’t escape from noticing the
underlying dark harsh world, which remains unchanged by the events of the play. In
complete contrast we have (SB). This is most definitely a film with sunshine bright
angle on life. Although darkness does exist in the film, in the form of the corrupt
president Barry Fife good wins out in the end. The opposite is the case with (WH)
which is most definitely a dark novel yet again containing moments of happiness. Like
when Mr Earnshaw dies Nelly overhears Catherine and Heathcliff consoling each
other, ‘the little souls consoling each other with better thoughts than I could have hit
on.’

From the beginning of (PB) [we] get a very dark, pessimistic view of life. We meet
Pegeen who is preparing for her wedding. We rapidly realise that Pegeen does not
love her fiancé Shawn Keogh nor even like him. She is only marrying him because the
choice in the area is extremely limited. How could she love Shawn Keogh, he is a
meek cowardly individual afraid of his own shadow. ‘I’m afeard of Father Reilly.’ In the
  ©The Dublin School of Grinds              48                          Deasy & Cowzer
beginning of (SB) contrasts hugely to that of the (PB). We are introduced to the
heightened artificial, fantastical world of ballroom dancing in a mockumentary style.
Shirley Hastings speaks to the camera about the tragedy of Scott dancing new steps.
We are given flashbacks of the event. Although it does show pessimism due to the
shallowness of the characters there is definitely an air of humour about it. All that is
important to these people is winning. ‘Scott: I just want to know what you thought of
the steps. Liz: I don’t think. I don’t give a shit about them. We lost.’ On a much heavier
and realist level WH darkness and pessimism is part of the fabric of (WH) from the
begining. Mr Lockwood the new tenant of Thrushcross Grange visits Wuthering
Heights the home of his new landlord Heathcliff. He receives a gruff welcome from
Heathcliff whilst he unchains the gate. Lockwood notes the harshness and rawness of
the landscape. Which is a prime example of pathetic fallacy on Brontë’s part.
Catherine herself even refers to ‘My love for Heathcliff resembles the eternal rocks
beneath, a source of very little delight but necessary. Nelly, I am Heathcliff.’

In each of the three texts a new character enters each of which have contrasting
effects on the respective worlds they enter. In (PB) the young handsome Christy
Mahon enters. He brings excitement and live [life] into this dark harsh corner of the
world. He is a new romantic figure whom Pegeen falls madly in love with. He too loves
her deeply. For a time this pessimistic sad world is brightened. For the first time we
see Pegeen truely happy. ‘and to thinks its me Christy Mahon taling sweetly. And I the
fright of seven towns over for my biting tongue.’ In (WH) similarly we have the entry of
a male, Heathcliff. He has hugely contrasting effects on the world he enters. He
inspires undying pure love with Cathering whilst simultaneously fuels utter hatred in
Hindley, due to jealously. Contrastly totally to the previous two in (SB) we have a
female, Fran, who enters the film. She is a beginner dancer of Spanish origin. She has
a completely positive effect of the film. She teaches Scott ‘a life lived in fear is a life
half lived.’ She gives him the belief that they can dance their own steps and over
come the corrupt dance federation. They achieve these and in doing so they release
Doug and Shirley who ‘lived their lives in fear’.

(PB) ends darkly espically for Pegeen who loses the lover of her life. ‘Oh I’ve lost his
surely I’ve lost the only true Playboy of the Western World.’ With perhaps the except
of Christy who becomes a new man and who heads home to Munster as ‘King of all
fights’ the world is left unchanged. Most definitely a place with a dark outlook on life.
Contrasting wholly is (SB) which ends on an extremely positive note. Fran and Scott

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds              49                           Deasy & Cowzer
falll in love, the corrupt Barry Fife is exposed and everyone dances to the song ‘Love
is in the Air’. A truely bright ending, (SB) being quite similar to (WH) in this incidence.
There is finally the happy union of the ancient Lintons and Earnshaws in the marriage
of young Cathy and Hareton. There is also comforting sense that Catherine and
Heathcliff are finally together. ‘They’s Heathcliff and a woman yonder.’

Therefore I believe that yes indeed each text we read does present us with an outlook
on life. However after studying the three texts on my comparative course I conclude
that no text can be fully optimistic, bright or pessimistic dark. It is a complex
combination of both.

P 18/21

C 16/21

L14/ 21

M 05/ 07

Total mark awarded ex 70: 53

Comment:

• Clear and sustained engagement with the task

• Candidate structures the answer in a careful, coherent fashion

• Some points might have been developed more fully

• Some flaws in language control

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds              50                          Deasy & Cowzer
Literary Genre
“The creation of memorable characters is part of the art of good story-telling.”

Write an essay comparing the ways in which memorable characters were
created and contributed to your enjoyment of the stories in the texts you have
studied for your comparative course. It will be sufficient to refer to the creation
of one character from each of your chosen texts.

Literary genre is the manner in which the text is told. The texts which I have studied as
part of my comparative analysis are the romantic satire “Strictly Ballroom”(SB), a film
by Baz Luhrmann, the gothic bildunsroman “Wuthering Heights” (WH) a novel by
Emily Bronte, and the modern dram [drama] “Philadelphia Here I Come” (PHIC) a play
by Brian Friel. All three of my texts make use of genres such as romance and drama,
however, no two authors use the same methods in creating these genres. Through the
clever creation of memorable characters and diverse plots the authors all display the
art of good story-telling.

In my answer I wish to focus on the aspects of narration and narrative techniques,
imagery and symbolism and character creation. In my opinion these aspects greatly
contribute to and enhance each of my texts.

Narration and narrative techniques play a vital role in the successful creation of
characters and development of plot in each of my texts and add to my overall
understanding and enjoyment of each text. All three of my texts employ different
methods of narration to tell their story. In SB, Luhrmann utilises omniscient narration
by using the camera and showing all points of view instead of focusing on the view of
one particular character. Similarly, Friel employs omniscient narration to allow us to
witness many of the characters viewpoints in PHIC by using stage directions. Unlike
my other two texts, Bronte uses a much more complex and multi-layered type of
narration in WH which allows her to develop a more intricate plot.

In each of my texts the type of narration chosen by the author is effective in creating
both the characters and the storyline. Luhrmann uses the camera in SB to his
advantage as he can create characters by using high or low angle shots. Luhrmann
can, therefore, influence how a character is portrayed. For example, Barry Fife is
shown in a darkened office as there is an extreme close up on his mouth. This clearly
establishes him as the evil villain within the story. Similarly, Friel also uses omniscient

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds              51                          Deasy & Cowzer
narration to develop his plot. Like Luhrmann, Friel uses omniscient narration, however
he also employs the use of dual character in Private Gar and Public Gar. This gives
added depth and humour to an otherwise banal plot as eccentric Private Gar can
mock the characters around him ‘Screwballs’ and also show deep emotional feeling.
In the same way, Bronte’s narration complements her plot as it allows her to develop
complex characters. Unlike the other two texts, Bronte is completely reliant on the
written word so she must depend on passionate description to accentuate her
characters. Through descriptive narrative we see Heathcliff is a “fierce, wolfish, pitiless
man”.

All of my texts employ the use of flashback as a narrative technique to enhance their
storylines. In SB, we witness the 1967 flashback and the Waratah Dance
Championship so that we become aware of the characters’ past and can, therefore,
better understand there present situation. Friel uses flashback in the same way as
Luhrmann as he portrays flashbacks of Kathy Doogan and of Aunt Lizzie’s visit, both
events which are essential to understanding the present circumstances of Gar’s
departure for America. Although both texts employ flashback, I feel that Friel does so

much more naturally. Friel makes use of the fluid areas of the stage to present
flashbacks which are provoked often by Gar’s music. Unlike Friel, Luhrmann uses the
camera to jump back in time effortlessly and without warning. In the initial
mockumentary scene, we are unaware that we are witnessing flashback until we are
brought back to the present day. Unlike these two texts, WH does not employ a
number of consequential flashbacks but instead makes her narrative one continuous
flashback which begins when Lockwood arrives at Wuthering Heights.

Overall it may be said that all three texts use excellent narrative structures to bring
their memorable characters to life. Bronte, like Friel employs two main narrators, Nelly
and Lockwood to give both a realistic and relatable quality to her plot. By studying
these types of narration I have been able to fully enter and enjoy each of my texts.

Imagery and symbolism is used by each of my authors to clearly depict the lives of
characters and the obstacles which they face. All three of my texts employ the use of
two different houses to depict the clearly different ways of living within the texts. In SB,
Luhrmann creates a clear distinction between the home of Scott and Fran. Scotts
home is pink, flamboyant and covered in trophy which show a clear obsession with
winning and no evidence of filial love. Opposite to this is Fran’s home which is more

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds               52                          Deasy & Cowzer
subdued and humble but much more loving. Fran’s home is both literally and
symbolically on the ‘wrong side of the tracks’. Comparitevely, Bronte also illustrates
two completely different homes, families and ways of living. Thrushcross Grange is a
“splendid dwelling” which is “carpeted with crimson” and echoes the class, education
and sophistication of the Lintons. On the other hand, Wuthering Heights, like Fran’s
home, is much more dark and seems to represent a family which is much more free-
spirited, it is a “perfect misanthropists heaven”. Unlike my other two texts, Friel does
not create two polar homes in PHIC. Instead Friel juxtaposes Gar’s current life in the
isolated town of Ballybeg with the prospects and vitality he will face when he reaches
America.

In all three texts the different ways of living become emblematic of the memorable
characters which the author creates in their stories. Fran in SB is paralleled by her
home as she is initially timid and shy a “beginner dancer” who falls victim to the much
more domineering and manipulative Shirley Hastings. Bronte uses the same
technique as Luhrmann and mirrors her characters with their homes. The Lintons of
Thrushcross Grange are much more well-mannered and sophisticated while Heathcliff
and Cathy from WH are wild and free-spirited and often very domineering. Similarly,
Friel contrasts characters within Ballybeg with those outside. The O’Donnells are said
to be “like to peas in a pod” while the Gallagher girls of Bailtefree are the exact
opposite as they are “always laughing or crying …you know, sorta silly”.

The window is also a symbol utilised by my authors to show isolation and separation.
In SB, we are shown in the opening sequence a group of women ‘caged’ behind a
glass window. This symbol, therefore, immediately creates the idea that the woman’s
role is subservient to the man’s in Ballroom dancing. Doug is also panned down with
the camera and shown through a window which shows his isolation and separation
from the dancing world which has stifled his creativity. In the same manner, Bronte
successfully uses the window symbol to portray the separation of Cathy and Heathcliff
and Heathcliff’s ultimate isolation. As Cathy is welcomed into the Linton home,
Heathcliff is left outside to look upon their family through a window. In contrast, Friel
does not employ the symbol of the window directly. However, a comparison may be
drawn as by the use of Private Gar, Friel offers us a ‘window’ into the mind and
thoughts of Gar. Just as in my other two texts Friel shows the explicit isolation of a
character as Gar pleads with his father silently to “make one unpredictable remark”.

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds             53                          Deasy & Cowzer
By analysing the use of imagery and symbolism within my three texts I have come to
realise that authors can use similar symbols in many ways to effectively create
memorable characters and so successfully tell their story.

Character creation is pivotal to the overall development of any plot and my three texts
use diverse methods of character creation in order to complement their individual
stories. Each of my texts employs a number of dramatic characters within their plot.
Characters such as the hot-tempered Cathy in WH are comparable to Shirley
Hastings in SB as both authors make them extremely flamboyent and eccentric. This
is paralleled by Friel in PHIC as Private Gar proves an extremely dramatic character.
The text is more minimalistic than the other two, however it is no less dramatic
because of the use of the highly-strung and intriguing character we see in the mind of
Private Gar.

Each of my texts also employs the use of somewhat exaggerated characters in their
story-telling. In SB, Luhrmann creates over-the-top characters which stem from the
fairytale genre who are sometimes very unbelievable. For example, when Ken
Railings glids in and asks Liz to be his dance partner because his partner has “broken
both her legs”. Similarly, Bronte’s narrators may be said to be exaggerated characters
that are somewhat unbelievable. Nelly Dean, who is a servant living in poor conditions
outlives many of the other wealthier characters in the novel who would have had
better health and homes. Unlike my other two texts, Friel maintains a sense of realism
in his characters which compounds both his themes and characters.

All three of my texts employ thought-provoking antagonists. In SB, Luhrmann
immediately establishes Barry Fife as “evil villain” and does not dwell on motives as
he stays within the cliché fairytale genre. Contrastingly, Heathcliff is a much more
complex antagonist. Unlike Luhrmann, Bronte explores the motives behind the actions
of Heathcliff. We are inclined at time to sympathise with him, however, his actions
towards the younger generation make him a true villain. “We’ll see if one tree wont
grow as crooked as another with the same wind to twist it”. In contrast, Friel shows no
outright antagonist however it seems that Gar himself (Public) seems to repeatedly
stifle and disregard the wishes of Private by his total lack of communication with his
father and he is, therefore, an antagonistic force to the progression of the plot.

From studying the Narration, Imagery and Symbolism and Character Creation of my
three texts, I have gained a better understanding of Literary genre. The creation of

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds              54                          Deasy & Cowzer
memorable characters by each of my authors is testament to their unique and
outstanding ability as excellent story-tellers. I feel by studying Literary Genre it has
enriched my experience of each text and the techniques and methods which the
authors used to create it.

P 21/21

C 21/21

L 21/21

M 6/7

Total marks awarded ex 70: 69

Comment:

•Sustained engagement with the task

•Focused points supported by detailed reference

•Comparative approach throughout

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds             55                         Deasy & Cowzer
List of prescribed texts for the Leaving Certificate English examination of June 2018. Texts
chosen for study must be from this list.

At Higher Level a play by Shakespeare must be one of the texts chosen. This can be studied on its
own or as a text within the comparative study. At Ordinary Level the study of a play by Shakespeare
is optional.

1. One text for study on its own from the following texts:

BINCHY, Maeve                           Circle of Friends (O)
BRONTË, Emily                           Wuthering Heights (H/O)
FITZGERALD, F. Scott                    The Great Gatsby (H/O)
GAIMAN, Neil                            The Ocean at the End of the Lane (O)
MILLER, Arthur                          All My Sons
(H/O)

NGOZI ADICHIE, Chimamanda               Americanah
(H/O)

O’CASEY, Sean                           The Plough and the Stars (O)
RYAN, Donal                             The Spinning Heart (O)
SHAKESPEARE, William                    King Lear (H/O)

 One of the texts marked with H/O may be studied on its own either at Higher Level or at
Ordinary Level.

 One of the texts marked with O may be studied on its own at Ordinary Level.

2. Three other texts to be studied in a comparative manner, according to the comparative modes
prescribed for this course.

 Any texts from the list of texts prescribed for comparative study, other than the one already
chosen for study on its own, may be selected for the comparative study.

 At Higher Level and at Ordinary Level, a film may be studied as one of the three texts in a
comparative study. Only texts identified on the list as films may be studied as films.
  ©The Dublin School of Grinds                   56                               Deasy & Cowzer
The Comparative Modes for examination in 2018 are:

Higher Level                    (i) The Cultural Context
                                (ii) General Vision and Viewpoint
                                (iii) Literary Genre

Ordinary Level                  (i) Social Setting
                                (ii) Relationships
                                (iii) Hero, Heroine, Villain

 List of Texts prescribed for comparative study, for examination in the year 2018.

AUSTEN, Jane                            Emma Y
BINCHY, Maeve                           Circle of Friends
BRONTË, Emily                           Wuthering Heights
COLLINS, Ciarán                         The Gamal
CHBOSKY, Stephen                        The Perks of Being a Wallflower
CUARÓN, Alfonso (Dir.)                  Children of Men (Film) Y
FITZGERALD, F. Scott                    The Great Gatsby Y
GAIMAN, Neil                            The Ocean at the End of the Lane
GAUTREAUX. Tim                          The Next Step in the Dance
GREEN, John                             The Fault in Our Stars
HARDY, Thomas                           The Mayor of Casterbridge
HAZANAVICIUS, Michel (Dir.)             The Artist (Film) Y
HITCHCOCK, Alfred (Dir.)                Rear Window (Film)
HOLMES, Alex (Dir.)                     Stop at Nothing: The Lance Armstrong Story (Film)
HOOPER, Tom (Dir.)                      Les Misérables (Film)
IBSEN, Henrik                           A Doll’s House Y
KEANE, John B                           Big Maggie

  ©The Dublin School of Grinds                   57                             Deasy & Cowzer
KEEGAN, Claire                           Foster Y
KINGSOLVER, Barbara                      Flight Behaviour
McCABE, EUGENE                           Death and Nightingales
McDONAGH, Martin                         A Skull in Connemara
MILLER, Arthur                           All My Sons Y
MILLER, Madeline                         The Song of Achilles
NGOZI ADICHIE, Chimamanda                Americanah
O’CASEY, Sean                            The Plough and the Stars Y
ORWELL, George                           1984 Y
PEACE, David                             The Damned Utd
REITMAN, Jason (Dir.)                    Juno (Film)Y
RYAN, Donal                              The Spinning HeartY
SALVATORES, Gabriele (Dir.)              I’m not Scared
(Film) SATRAPI, Marjane                  Persepolis

SHAKESPEARE, William                     King Lear
                                         Macbeth

SIMPSON, Joe                             Touching the Void
SOPHOCLES                                Antigone
VÁSQUEZ, Juan Gabriel                    The Sound of Things Falling
ZUSAK, Markus           The Book Thief

 ©The Dublin School of Grinds                     58                   Deasy & Cowzer
You can also read