Commissioning for better health outcomes - September 2016 - Case studies - Local ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Foreword Councils have a critical role to play in We have developed this guide with securing good health outcomes for the commissioners from councils and partner communities they serve. In the context of an organisations, building on existing learning ageing population with increasing complex and resources and sharing new and long term conditions, the need to address innovative practice developed by those emergent concerns such as obesity and working to improve public health. We hope oral health, coupled with a picture of health that it will help to support change and inequalities across the country, this is a enable commissioners to have even more significant challenge. of a positive impact on the health of the communities they serve. Councils, working with partners in health, housing, leisure and the voluntary and community sector, among others, have risen to this challenge and are taking innovative approaches to how they improve the health of their citizens, some examples of which you will see in this guide. Council leaders are encouraging locally delivered solutions that lie at the core of localism. These solutions are based on an understanding of the needs of local communities. They build on local community assets, drawing together Councillor David Simmonds communities and partners to develop a Chairman, LGA Improvement and Innovation joined up, multi-faceted approach to Board improving health. Commissioners are vital in the process of making the most of collective resources to improve health outcomes. We acknowledge that commissioners are experiencing a period of change. Citizens are no longer seen as passive recipients of services but enablers of their own good health, supported by the communities around them. The role of commissioning has changed from identifying Councillor Izzi Seccombe and procuring services for individuals to Chair, LGA Community Wellbeing Board bringing people together to enable citizens to live a fulfilling and independent life for as long as possible. 2 Commissioning for better health outcomes
Contents Introduction 4 The role of councils in improving health outcomes 5 What is commissioning? 7 Principles for good commissioning 9 Case studies 12 Commissioning an integrated 0-5s service in Cheshire East 13 Commissioning a new Healthy Lifestyle Service for Devon 15 Risk-Avert – a schools-based programme to help young people build resilience and manage risk in Essex 18 Commissioning a new children and young people’s emotional health and wellbeing service for Halton 20 Warm Homes, Healthy Homes in Leicestershire 23 Drink Less Enjoy More – an alcohol licensing intervention in Liverpool 25 The London Sexual Health Transformation Programme 27 Commissioning a latent TB screening service for Wolverhampton 29 Links to useful resources 31 Commissioning for better health outcomes 3
Introduction Councils were given responsibility for public Common to all of the examples was the health in April 2013. The initial focus was on enthusiasm for working in the council ensuring a safe transition of staff, services environment, the opportunities it had brought and contracts – and getting these into good to make better links between programmes shape. Now, three years on, many councils and the mutual respect that had been are moving to a phase of transformation with built up between colleagues from different health being embedded in everything the professional backgrounds. Many also pointed council does, including its commissioning. to the value of political leadership of the health agenda and the critical role elected Investing in prevention and better health members played in ensuring momentum in outcomes can be part of the solution to the difficult times. challenges of increasing levels of need along with shrinking budgets. Effective preventative interventions can reduce health and social care costs and the need for welfare benefits. Better health can also enhance resilience, employment and social outcomes. The financial climate for councils and their partners is becoming increasingly tough, making it ever more important to get the best outcomes from the scarce resources available. Effective commissioning is one of the levers that councils can use to make the most of the resources they and their partners have. This guidance is based around a set of principles that make for good commissioning. These were developed from a scoping workshop with public health and procurement staff, consultation with delegates at the Local Government Association (LGA) and Association of Directors of Public Health (ADPH) conference and from the lessons emerging from the case studies included in this report. The case studies have been chosen to illustrate positive approaches to commissioning being taken across the country to address a wide range of public health challenges. 4 Commissioning for better health outcomes
The role of councils in improving health outcomes The Health and Social Care Act 2012 Investing in prevention and better health gave councils new duties to improve the outcomes can be part of the solution to the health of local people. They formally took conundrum faced by councils of how to on responsibility for public health in April meet increasing need with reducing funding. 2013. The focus initially was on ensuring a Helping people to stay heathy can reduce safe transition. Three years on, councils are health and social care costs along with the increasingly looking to transform the way that need for welfare benefits. Better health can they and partners work to improve the health enhance resilience, employment and social of local people. Effective commissioning outcomes thus keeping people independent is one of the levers they have to deliver and reducing dependence on services. transformation. The influences on health go well beyond Duties of councils under the Health and the delivery of specific services set out in Social Care Act 2012 legislation, hence the focus on commissioning • duty on upper tier and unitary authorities for better outcomes in this guidance (see to improve the health of local people diagram overleaf). To address a complex issue like obesity or giving children the best • duty to have regard to guidance including start in life, many different approaches may the Public Health Outcomes Framework need to be coordinated to produce the best • regulations specify: impact. This could include the provision of ◦◦ National Child Measurement Programme services to support individuals, designing programmes to create healthier environments ◦◦ NHS Health Checks and building additional social value into a ◦◦ sexual health services construction project, for example. ◦◦ provision of public health advice Commissioning for better health outcomes to CCGs stretches well beyond using the public health ◦◦ information and advice on health ring-fenced grant to purchasing specific protection services to using all the resources that a system has at its disposal to have the biggest ◦◦ some of the Healthy Child Programme impact on outcomes. is now also mandated following 0-5s transfer in October 2015. These functions are supported by a ring- fenced public health grant until 2018/19 when funding from retained business rates is due to replace the current local authority funding system. Public health services that are part of the comprehensive health service are governed by NHS constitution and so, for example, must be provided free at point of use. Commissioning for better health outcomes 5
The benefits of investing in effective public health Source: WHO (2013a) Outcomes can be measured using the The public health outcomes framework 2013 national outcome frameworks for the NHS, to 2016 concentrates on: public health and adult social care1. Using these outcome measures councils and • increased healthy life expectancy partners are able to benchmark performance • reduced differences in life expectancy as an approach to making improvements. and healthy life expectancy between The NHS Outcomes Framework sets out the communities. outcomes and corresponding indicators that will be used to hold NHS England to account The Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework for improvements in health outcomes. (ASCOF) measures how well care and support services achieve the outcomes that matter most to people. 1 https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/health-and- social-care-outcomes-frameworks 6 Commissioning for better health outcomes
What is commissioning? Commissioning is a term that is used The Cabinet Office Commissioning Academy differently by different people, and is defines commissioning as the effective design often used as shorthand for procurement and delivery of policies and services – so it or contracting which are only part of is much wider than procuring services from the process. There are many different an external provider. This definition works well commissioning models and the language for public health challenges that are complex, associated with commissioning differs across where there is no single silver bullet that will sectors which can add to the confusion. solve the issue, and where prevention and When talking about commissioning with early intervention at a population level are partners it can be time well spent to explore often more cost effective than providing more what everyone actually means. expensive treatment services to deal with the consequences of unhealthy environments and behaviours. COMMISSIONING PLAN ANALYSE Legislation Gap analysis and guidance Population needs assessment PURCHASING/ Commissioning CONTRACTING strategy Review service provision Access individual Develop service needs specifications and Resource Identify intended contracts/SLAs Service design analysis outcomes Analyse Purchasing plan providers OUTCOMES FOR PEOPLE Arrange services Contract and support monitoring Capacity building Market/provider Review strategic Review individual development outcomes outcomes Contract management Capacity building Review strategic and market Manage performance provider relationships REVIEW DO A commissioning model Source: Institute of Public Care, Oxford Brookes University Commissioning for better health outcomes 7
The Institute of Public Care model above shows commissioning as a complete process from understanding needs in the population, developing a strategy and designing the intervention, working with providers and reviewing performance. The procurement activities are inextricably linked with the overall procurement process and are needed at all stages of the commissioning process, not just during tendering for a service. The desired outcomes for the population are central to the whole process. The Commissioning Academy framework asks a series of questions linked to the stages of the commissioning cycle: • What’s the question? • Get to know and work with your customers • Define the outcomes and priorities • What will it look like? • How will you get there? • Measure the impact. They recommend spending significant time working with partners on the first two questions – being clear on the issue that needs to be addressed and understanding what will work for the people the intervention is intended to help – as this will increase the chances of a successful intervention being commissioned and potentially save resources in the longer term. 8 Commissioning for better health outcomes
Principles for good commissioning The range of work that councils are undertaking to transform the health of their 1. Act as system leaders populations is wide and varied. But some key to build the right culture, themes and principles are emerging for what relationships and makes commissioning most effective. partnerships These principles have been developed from a focus group of public health and Commissioning is sometimes regarded procurement professionals, from discussions as a narrow activity focused on securing with delegates at the LGA/ADPH Annual services from external providers. All of our Public Health Conference and from the case studies included some form of tender lessons emerging from the case studies process but more importantly they were included in the report. developed in the context of a wider strategy sitting within a wider system. To commission 1. Act as system leaders to build the right effectively different parts of the local system culture, relationships and partnerships (and often wider) need to be brought together to identify the best solutions to complex 2. Have a clear focus on outcomes issues. Building a culture of trust and strong 3. Take time to understand what is driving relationships is critical to success. population behaviour Some of our case studies illustrate clearly 4. Invest strategically and for the longer term how bringing different people into the conversation has led to more innovative 5. Work with communities and build approaches being developed. on assets Devon drew on the skills of their digital 6. Work with providers as partners and transformation, social marketing and shape the market communications teams in developing their 7. Commission across systems and for public-focused commissioning approach. whole pathways from prevention to care Cheshire East are investing their energy 8. Use evidence of what works and build in working with their new provider for 0-5s new evidence through evaluation. services post-contract award to develop closer integration between health and early years services. All were convinced that a team approach, valuing different skills and perspectives made for more effective outcomes. Commissioning for better health outcomes 9
2. Have a clear focus 4. Invest strategically and on outcomes for the longer term Building a clear, shared understanding of Complex population health issues are unlikely why something is important and what you to be solved overnight by single interventions. are aiming to achieve helps to maintain Commissioners will usually need to build focus and momentum for the longer term. up a network of policies, programmes and Elected members play an important role in services that together have the desired determining and maintaining the emphasis on impact. Sustaining effort and impact over the priority issues and outcomes. long term is important to success and this may not be best served by recommissioning London has defined clear health outcomes services every two to three years. for its city wide sexual health transformation programme. Essex worked with their procurement team to secure a long-term co-design partner for Leicestershire used the Public Health their programme to work with young people in Outcomes Framework to identify fuel poverty managing risk. Their model also enables them and reducing excess winter deaths as priority to generate commercial revenue that can be outcomes. used to support the local programme. Devon designed their procurement process London are developing a pan London sexual to enable co-development of outcomes and health transformation programme. Long term outputs with the successful provider. contracts are being put in place to enable Cheshire East is linking financial incentives providers to make the investment needed to to the achievement of desired outcomes transform the service delivery model. 3. Take time to understand 5. Work with communities what is driving population and build on assets behaviour This can lead to a better understanding of the issues facing communities and what The Commissioning Academy emphasises approaches are likely to work. Working with that spending time on the early parts of the the assets that communities hold such as commissioning process by understanding the skills and networks within the community issue being addressed and what works for as well as facilities can lead to more specific communities is vital to the success of sustainable solutions and avoid creating the whole process. dependency on services. Devon used Mosaic analysis to segment their Devon worked with focus groups drawn population into different groups and then from different population groups to develop worked with focus groups drawn from these their integrated lifestyle service. groups to understand how they would best engage with lifestyle services. Essex and Halton have built strong relationships with schools and built their Liverpool used behavioural insight to design capacity to address risk-taking by young their campaign to reduce the sale of alcohol people and mental health issues. to people who were drunk. Halton and Cheshire East used in depth work from their Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) and the Director of Public Health (DPH) Annual Report in the design of their services for children. 10 Commissioning for better health outcomes
Cheshire East is bringing council children’s 6. Work with providers services together with the 0-5s healthy as partners and shape child programme to deliver more integrated the market services. It is a myth that commissioners should keep Wolverhampton has needed to identify and a clear separation from providers. Whilst it plan for increased treatment workload arising is important to treat all potential providers from a latent TB screening service. Their fairly throughout a tender process, innovative voluntary sector partner has been critical to approaches can be achieved through ensuring patients continue with treatment. engaging a range of potential providers in the design of services and through working collaboratively with them once a contract has 8. Use evidence of been awarded. what works and build Devon held a discovery day and market new evidence through days to encourage providers to develop more innovative responses to their tender for evaluation lifestyle services. The resources section of this guidance provides links to a wealth of evidence of Halton held market development days and what works to improve outcomes. Good encouraged collaborative bids from providers. commissioners will make the best use of what Cheshire East are working collaboratively with is already available and also evaluate their their community 0-5s provider post contract work to add to the evidence base. award to develop more integrated services. Wolverhampton used national evidence to identify that screening for latent TB was an effective intervention, and evaluated their pilot 7. Commission across programme to identify how their local at risk systems and for whole population could be reached most effectively pathways from prevention and supported through their treatment. to care Liverpool used international evidence to identify a promising intervention for A commissioned programme does not exist in reducing heavy drinking in city centres. They isolation. Many of our case studies identified independently evaluated their campaign to how they had created links to other related inform future local commissioning. programmes to maximise reach and impact. They also identified how it was important to Devon retained a specialist stop smoking plan for the whole pathway from prevention service as a component of their integrated through to treatment. lifestyle service having reviewed the evidence. Leicestershire has built links from its Warm Effective commissioning depends on being Homes, Healthy Homes programme to other really clear about the issue to be addressed housing support and created multiple referral and bringing the right team together to routes into the service. Securing funding identify the most cost-effective solutions. Our for housing improvements will increase the case studies show the benefits of working impact of the programme. with the public, services users and providers as partners, and also the benefits of bringing Halton has brought together previously separate together the skills and experience of a prevention, early help and treatment approaches wide range of council officers and elected to develop an integrated children and adolescent members with the shared goal of improving mental health service (CAMHS). health. Commissioning for better health outcomes 11
Case studies 12 Commissioning for better health outcomes
Commissioning an integrated 0-5s service in Cheshire East Councils formally took on commissioning The priorities identified are transition to responsibility for the 0-5s Healthy Child parenthood, parental mental health, child Programme in October 2015. Cheshire East mental health and the two-and-a-half year Council re-procured its services for children review. The group have started work on the aged 0-5 ahead of the formal transfer with a co-location of services and making better use view to working with the new service provider of the estate available across the children’s to transform services and better integrate centres and NHS properties. them with council in-house early help provision and children’s centres. They have Progress on integrating IT has been slower consciously adopted a partnership approach but they are looking to implement common to transformation with their provider, aiming systems across the NHS and council for the to achieve systematic change and build on universal offer and safeguarding work. good practice that had been there in isolated The transformation group are now focusing pockets previously. on the important steps along the parent’s journey, five of which are the mandatory health checks. The journey identifies roles What approach was taken? within the system, what information, advice and guidance should be available at each Cheshire East Public Health team worked stage and when additional targeted support with NHS England to re-commission the is needed. The aim is for the service to 0-5 services following the same timeline as be more systematic with active follow-up Cheshire East’s re-commissioning of 5-19 of families that have not engaged, as well services. The service specification followed as better information-sharing between the national model, adapted to ensure local professionals. Work on mental health has needs were addressed. This was informed engaged the two maternity providers for the by the JSNA, the Director of Public Health’s area and has made progress connecting up (DPH) Annual Report, and joint work with pathways, strengthening onward referral and the Children’s Directorate. Joint market improving access to peer support services. engagement events were held with NHS England. The procurement was carried out by The group are beginning to engage parents Cheshire East Council. The assessment panel with the development of the parent journey for the bids consisted of representatives from and to work with the Council for Voluntary NHS England (Quality and Immunisation and Service to strengthen the qualitative Vaccination Lead), the councils public health information from parents in the JSNA. team and children’s services staff, a CCG representative and a local GP. Incentive payments (of up to 5 per cent of the contract value) have been built into the A transformation group comprising public contract with the provider and these have health, the community trust provider, council been linked to Key Performance Indicators prevention and early help services and (KPIs). Early payments are related to the children’s centres is leading the ongoing work. establishment of the service, however, in future years they will be more closely aligned Their main focus has been on making practical to improvements in health outcomes. changes that will support a more integrated service. This has included workshops involving council and NHS staff working together to build relationships and identify local priorities based on national guidance. Commissioning for better health outcomes 13
What impact did it have? Frontline staff transferred from the previous provider and it has been particularly Relationships are already much improved important to ensure they feel engaged in both at management level and between the transformation. The workshops were frontline council and NHS staff, creating a a useful start to this, but different types of productive environment for transformation. engagement with more local teams may Staff are increasingly working from co-located have been better. Commissioning staff have venues and opportunities to make more cost- also spent time shadowing frontline staff effective use of property have been identified. which has helped build trust and for them to understand local needs better. Baseline data for services was limited but there is a desire to work towards a more The DPH Annual Report was important in outcomes based contract. Early KPI’s illustrating the impact of parental and child specified in the contract were linked to the mental health on longer term outcomes. This process of getting the new service into place. helped with understanding the issue and For next year, this will shift to progress on getting it higher on the agenda. the service priorities such as establishing a Partnership governance and strong elected baseline position for mental health. member leadership have helped keep the The increased profile for children’s and focus on transformation and integration and parental mental health needs has led to this ensure that links are made with other related being a focus for joint work on healthy schools. programmes. The transformation group works within the frameworks provided by the Health and Wellbeing Board and the Children’s Trust What has been learned? and is linked to the Joint Commissioning Leadership team. Establishing a culture of openness and investing in the relationship with the new Contact provider has been vital. There are a limited Lucy Heath number of providers in this market and the Consultant in Public Health, style of leadership, capacity to work with Cheshire East Council partners and openness to transform services are important discriminators between lucy.heath@cheshireeast.gov.uk providers. Further information Working on relationships is helping to create a DPH Annual Report 2013/14 sense of “we are all in this together” to make www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/PDF/Annual-Public- the biggest impact, rather than the “us and Health-Report-2014-FINAL.pdf them” culture. Seeing providers as colleagues in the system rather than having a purely contractual relationship has helped with this. 14 Commissioning for better health outcomes
Commissioning a new Healthy Lifestyle Service for Devon Devon, like many areas, had commissioned Starting from the perspective of the user was individual lifestyle services to support lifestyle important. This approach was initially shaped change, eg smoking cessation and weight using Mosaic analysis of population data to management services, for many years. define three key groups to work with – Inform These services were largely commissioned Me, Enable Me, Support Me. from NHS providers on the basis of funding available and outputs rather than outcomes. Services were reaching a small proportion of those who could potentially benefit – with 3 per cent of current smokers accessing the service each year for example. When public health transferred to the council, elected members took the view that as these services had never been subject to market testing they should be retendered to ensure the most cost-effective services were in place. It also came at a time when the Five Year Forward View was calling for a radical upgrade in prevention and the council The council then held a “discovery day” was reviewing its role as a commissioner, involving about 100 local people and enabler and connector. The public health organisations. The focus was an open team took the opportunity to review the whole exploration of what could be done to reduce approach to delivery of these services, rather premature deaths and long term conditions than simply tweaking the existing service rather than homing in on what services were specifications and retendering. There were needed. Discussions were geared around risks associated with this, but the risk of not “personas” that had been developed to changing was seen to be greater. represent the key Mosaic population groups. This led to a different, more innovative, conversation with providers who would What approach was taken? traditionally have been asked to respond to a detailed service specification. The design principles for the new model were that the user should be at the centre of They also held focus groups drawn from the the service, and there should be a focus on ‘Persona’ population groups following the outcomes and earlier intervention. discovery day. Again the conversation was quite different as instead of asking questions The public health team were fortunate to about where and when people would access have a social marketing lead within the team services they discussed what was important and, with the move to the council, they were to them in their lives – what made them happy, able to make strong links with people who who they talk to and who is important in they had not worked with previously such as their lives. They found the three groups were the digital technology lead and staff running very different in their needs with the Inform the community directory. This led to different Me group being motivated to change and conversations and much greater potential for reacting well to self-help, whereas those in integration and innovation. the Support Me group wanted face-to-face interaction and didn’t really trust the NHS, for example. Commissioning for better health outcomes 15
The outputs from the focus group and the There will be an online digital service, as well discovery day were fed into a market warming as telephone and texting service to reach and day with potential service providers. This was support Inform Me and Enable Me individuals a well attended event with over 30 providers as well as services that reach out into specific from public, private and voluntary sectors – communities providing face-to-face advice far more than would typically get engaged and support to those who need more support in more traditional procurement approaches. (Support Me). A targeted specialist stop The questions providers were asked were smoking service has also been retained as deliberately open – how would they reach part of the offer given strong evidence of these people and what would they offer? effectiveness. High level outcomes have been included in the specification but there is a As a result, the specification for the service commitment to co-production with providers has been constructed differently to give post award. more scope for working collaboratively with providers to shape and define outcomes and outputs after the contract has been awarded. The integrated lifestyle service model for Devon Source: Devon County Council 16 Commissioning for better health outcomes
Links have also been made with national Mosaic data helped define characteristics programmes such as the Public Health of groups that providers could design England’s One You campaign which also services around. NICE evidence supported targets people in mid-life and, through the effectiveness of specialist stop smoking community directory, links them to community services which were retained as part of assets such as local rambling groups. the model. As with any new and different approach there What impact did it have? was inevitably some nervousness about the level of risk involved. Acknowledging the The tendering process closed at the challenges of taking a more radical approach beginning of April 2016 so it is too early and involving people early in the process to identify health outcomes that have helped to reduce anxiety in the system, been achieved. However, the approach as did having allies who bought into the has already been successful in attracting approach from the start. It was also important different providers into the marketplace to emphasise the risk of not changing and and introducing a more collaborative getting sub-optimal outcomes was actually approach to commissioning. greater than the risk of change. Involvement of the chair of the HWB and the inclusion of There has been wide interest across the Healthwatch has helped to ensure leadership council and among partners in building on and support across the system. the approach for other programmes. The council, in collaboration with the South West It is important to bring the market with you. Forum made a bid to the Cabinet Office The discovery day and market-warming day for funding to test how social value can be helped attract providers and to bring them better embedded within the commissioning on a shared journey. process. The funding enabled the authority Contact to work with the South West Forum to ensure social value was a prominent narrative within Steve Brown the commissioning process, including being Assistant Director of Public Health, explicitly written into the service specification Devon County Council and tender questioning. steve.brown@devon.gov.uk What has been learned? For the different approach to work, it has been important to be open as a commissioner, which meant letting go of the notion of being custodian of all the answers. Putting the user at the centre was critical to setting the tone for the whole process. Using evidence and data effectively helped shape the commissioning process. For example, data showing how few people who could benefit were accessing current services helped shift the focus to how do we engage with people who don’t use services. Commissioning for better health outcomes 17
Risk-Avert – a schools-based programme to help young people build resilience and manage risk in Essex Essex is a large, diverse county with a term programme. The steering group were population of 1.4 million. It has 12 district/ looking for a partner who provided the right borough/city councils, two neighbouring fit, understood their vision, had the skills unitary councils (Southend on Sea and and experience to develop the programme Thurrock) and, before the transition of public and establish it as a commercial entity, and health to councils in 2013, was served by was able to work well with the council and five primary care trusts (PCTs). The move of wider partners. As this was breaking new public health into the council enabled stronger ground, the advice of the procurement team, links with children’s services and between particularly in developing a suitable format drug and alcohol, sexual health and mental for the tender and the subsequent contract health commissioners. It also presented an was invaluable. The legal team have also opportunity to commission programmes been helpful in working through issues about across the whole county at scale. intellectual property and copyright which were important to ensure that the programme Essex had a history of commissioning school- retained commercial value. based programmes to address specific risks that young people may encounter, such as The successful bidder to become a co-design drugs and alcohol. These were mainly one- partner was The Training Effect (TTE). They off programmes commissioned using small worked with the steering group to build an initial pots of money. Evidence of sustained impact product that was tested in a small number of was often lacking. They identified a need schools. The model was refined and has been for a more sustainable approach that was rolled out across secondary schools in the embedded in the way that schools work and county. The approach is to screen all pupils in addressed the underlying reasons that led to Year 8 for their attitudes towards risk-taking. a range of risk-taking behaviours. Those with high scores then take part in a six session programme delivered by teachers in the school. The teachers involved received What approach was taken? training in delivery of the programme and will have annual refresher training. They also have In 2013, the initial concept was submitted to access to online resources and support. Wider the Safer Essex Partnership (the Pan Essex partners such as the Family Solutions Team Community Safety Partnership) who provided (the Essex Troubled Families provider), Pupil set up funding. A steering group involving the Referral Unit and the Police School Liaison team Police and Crime Commissioner, the Safer have also been trained so they are familiar with Essex Partnership, public health and health the aims and content of the programme. partners scoped out what they wanted to achieve with the programme. They worked Initial set up funding for the programme with the procurement team to commission a came from the Safer Essex Partnership. The co-design partner who would work with them ongoing funding has been provided from the to create and evaluate the programme. public health budget, with a longer term aim of making the delivery of the programme in This was a different approach as it was Essex cost-neutral by selling the programme about establishing a long-term partnership to other local authorities. with a view to developing a commercially viable entity, rather than commissioning The programme has been linked to the an organisation to simply deliver a short existing Healthy Schools Programme that 18 Commissioning for better health outcomes
already had effective links into schools across to enable them to provide the best advice on the county. This has enabled a managed suitable vehicles for doing this. In this case, roll-out of the programme over the course knowing that the longer term aim was to of two years, allowing capacity to be built develop a commercially viable product with slowly and minimising the need for additional the partner organisation was important to the marketing. Schools are represented on the way the tender was set up. It is also important steering group responsible for the ongoing to anticipate legal issues such as copyright management of the programme. so that advice can be sought as early in the process as possible. Given the concerns the team had about the lack of evidence of effectiveness for these The council brings valuable contacts to types of programmes, they have placed the partnership that make it work, such as a strong emphasis on evaluation. They access to the healthy schools programme have funded a PhD studentship with Essex and its established links into schools, making University and have also commissioned strategic links to other interventions, as well aspects of the evaluation from two other as funding. academic partners. Academy groups within Essex have been interested in commissioning the programme What impact has it had? for schools they operate elsewhere as they value having access to a quality, evaluated The first evaluation report from the programme product backed up by support. shows that it was being successfully delivered Whilst there are multiple providers who were in 30 secondary schools reaching around interested in selling off the shelf training 6,000 pupils. 94 per cent of pupils felt more programmes for schools, there were only a confident about managing risks and 74 per small number who were interested and able cent had a more positive relationship with to work with the council in a developmental their teacher. 86 per cent of teachers rated partnership. Providers will need to become their improvement in knowledge of risk-taking more flexible as councils increasingly look for behaviour at over eight out of 10. partnership models. Awareness of the Risk-Avert brand has Effort has had to be put in to keeping the developed and gained credibility amongst programme at the forefront of organisations’ partners. It is now being used to link memory to sustain momentum. Elected up complementary programmes such members and wider partners have been very as addressing hidden harms like child supportive of the programme and this has sexual exploitation, a healthy relationships been important to sustaining energy and programme aimed at Year 8 pupils, a primary commitment for the longer term. school resource pack, and resources for emotional health and wellbeing. Contact: The programme has been sold to several Ben Hughes other local authorities. This external income Head of Commissioning, Public Health has offset 20 per cent of the programme and Wellbeing, Essex County Council costs in Essex already, with the ultimate aim ben.hughes@essex.gov.uk being for the programme to be cost-neutral. Further information www.risk-avert.org What has been learned? It is important to spend time with procurement colleagues so that they understand what is to be achieved across the life of the partnership Commissioning for better health outcomes 19
Commissioning a new children and young people’s emotional health and wellbeing service for Halton Halton is a unitary authority in the Liverpool After their early work, approval to proceed City Region, serving a population with high with procurement of a jointly commissioned levels of deprivation and poor health. It is service was given in October 2014. coterminous with NHS Halton CCG and there is a long history of public health teams Halton had already developed a specific JSNA working collaboratively across Cheshire and for children and young people and this was Merseyside through Champs Public Health used as the starting point to understand in more Collaborative. depth the differing needs across age groups. Additional work was done jointly with the Local mental health and wellbeing services neighbouring boroughs of Cheshire West and followed a traditional tiered model with public Chester and Warrington to further understand health responsible for Level 1 and some level the specific needs of young people involved 2 services, the Local Authorities Children and with the youth offending service. Young people’s team commissioning some Level 2 provision and the CCG responsible There was early and continued engagement for Level 2 and 3. Services had problems with of young people in the process through long waiting times and there was confusion in engagement events with the Youth Parliament how to access the most appropriate support, and school councils, an online survey and with schools, for example, having only limited so on. Providers in the NHS and third sector access to early intervention. NHS Halton CCG were also actively involved in the process made the decision to recommission the level 2 through a series of engagement events. CAMHS service and this was identified as an What emerged was a broad, system wide opportunity to review all the children’s mental approach to children and young people’s health services in the borough to develop emotional and mental health and wellbeing a more integrated model which placed an and the development of an Emotional Health emphasis on promotion, prevention and and Wellbeing Plan. The plan focused early intervention to better meet the needs of attention on getting the right help in the right children and young people. The new model place, and had an emphasis on prevention, moved away from traditional levels and tiers early identification and access to services. of service towards the development of an This in turn led to a service specification integrated Emotional Health and Wellbeing that, as well as providing a targeted service service that worked across the continuum of for young people with high levels of need, need. also included a community and schools programme that had a wider reach and a strong emphasis on promoting positive mental What approach was taken? health, prevention and early intervention. The work was carried out under the remit of The integrated Emotional Health and the Children’s Trust and started in the summer Wellbeing service specification included of 2014. An integrated commissioning team both school and community based social was formed early on with input from children’s and emotional wellbeing training for front line services, public health and the CCG. This staff (including teachers, GPs, school nurses was critical to the success of the process as and social care staff), specialist counselling it enabled a sense of joint endeavour, working and therapeutic interventions, the targeted together in the best interests of the local youth offer provided by the council’s youth community and getting the most out of the service and public health early intervention Halton pound. and mental health awareness programmes. 20 Commissioning for better health outcomes
In addition there was a realisation that the Links have also been made with other service needed to capitalise on new methods health pathways such as that for healthy of engaging with young people through the weight, enabling children with a high BMI to provision of online resources and support, have specialist support including cognitive such as online counselling. behavioural therapy, as well as self-harm and eating disorder services, crisis resolution and Following a comprehensive procurement mindfulness. process, a contract was awarded in summer 2015 to the Five Boroughs Partnership NHS The quality and depth of the partnership Foundation Trust, (the local NHS mental health that has been built also provided a strong provider) working in partnership with Kooth, platform for Halton to submit a proposal for a third sector organisation with expertise in the National CAMHS Transformation Fund. working with schools and providing online They were selected as a national pilot site for support to young people. As well as providing the Schools Link programme, a new initiative the new service, the provider was also able designed to provide additional training and to integrate its existing Level 3 specialist resources for schools and to improve the provision into the local offer. This enabled a liaison with local services. much wider reach than previously possible which focused on the needs of the child and operated a “no wrong front door” policy. What has been learned? Establishing an integrated commissioning What impact has it had? team early in the process and ensuring there was support from the Children’s Trust and The new integrated approach to working has elected members was critically important. transformed what was previously a collection The team developed a strong partnership of loosely affiliated commissioners and from working together which enabled it to service providers into a focused and dynamic adapt effectively to changing circumstances. team with a true commitment to working During the procurement process, the council together to improve the emotional health and experienced a surge in numbers of children wellbeing of young people in Halton. The requiring care which meant that the service service has been operational for less than a specification and the funding available for the year and is already starting to make a real CAMHS tender had to be rapidly reviewed. difference. Waiting times have reduced and The strength of the partnership meant that more children are able to access help and a difficult situation could be discussed support than ever before. and resolved constructively without unduly delaying the tender. The new service has been able to facilitate professional support networks and has The CCG is the major funder of the service, provided “twilight” training sessions to staff but they utilised the council’s procurement in schools to increase their awareness and team for the tender process as they confidence in mental health issues. Kooth is recognised the value brought by the local also developing additional in school provision knowledge and skills of the team. as well as an innovative approach to online support. Commissioning for better health outcomes 21
Working with young people to design the service helped to develop a service which was much more geared to their needs. The positive experience from the CAMHS procurement process has meant that young people have since been more closely involved in the design and tendering process for other services, such as the new school nursing service. Involving providers and potential third sector partners with insights into the needs of children and their families through “soft” market testing is invaluable. The best people to design a service are those who have experience of delivering services. Creating an environment where good quality co- production can thrive is a key role for the commissioner to ensure that services meet the needs and aspirations of local people. Contact: Simon Bell Public Health Commissioning Manager, Halton Borough Council simon.bell@halton.gov.uk 22 Commissioning for better health outcomes
Warm Homes, Healthy Homes in Leicestershire Health in Leicestershire is generally better than and on reliable tradespeople. The team have the national average, however two indicators also provided awareness and training for in the Public Health Outcomes Framework professionals working with vulnerable people (PHOF) stand out as needing attention– fuel to help them identify who would benefit from a poverty and excess winter deaths. With elected referral into the service. member support, it was decided that public health should lead the development of a They have also now embedded the scheme sustainable approach to tackling fuel poverty into the Lightbulb Project, which is funded by in the county. The council’s work on affordable DCLG Transformation Funding, and is working warmth had previously been led by adult social to integrate the various housing support care using short term pots of funding that were services provided by the county and the coming to an end. The consultant in public seven district councils into a coherent offer health, who is leading the programme, came that is easier for residents to understand. into public health with extensive experience Funding for housing energy efficiency of working on housing and fuel poverty in the improvements now largely comes via energy voluntary sector. companies and is not targeted at the most vulnerable. A key development of the scheme has been securing funding from the What approach was taken? National Energy Action (NEA) Warm Homes Partnership Fund matched by the Better Reducing excess winter deaths had been Care Fund (BCF) that is enabling physical identified as a strategic priority by the HWB, measures, such as new boilers or insulation, informed by the JSNA and the DPH Annual to be installed for over 150 of the most Report. NICE guidance had also been vulnerable households. They are identified by published on reducing excess winter deaths risk stratification using housing, social care, and illness. Unlike many health issues, there GP and hospital discharge data and then is not a strong link between deprivation and contacted directly with an offer of advice and excess winter death, and in Leicestershire many support. Evaluation to demonstrate impact on older people live in large, difficult to heat homes. health and social care use is important to see External funding sources had come to an end if the scheme warrants the allocation of local and so £100,000 of public health funding funding to sustain and expand it. was identified to support the programme. The public health team worked with colleagues in adult social care and housing colleagues What impact has it had? based in district councils to develop a healthy The move to the council has enabled public housing referral service. The service was put health to build closer links with adult social out to tender and awarded to the Papworth care and housing colleagues which have Trust in partnership with National Energy been essential to getting the scheme running Action (NEA), the national fuel poverty charity. effectively and making links between services. The initial programme provided a range of The team have also maintained good links routes of referral into the service, including to the NHS and are in a better position to via First Contact Plus, the council’s referral influence change across the whole system. hub for a range of services. The team at Papworth Trust provided basic energy advice Being able to work as a team across public and more complex cases were referred onto health, adult social care, housing and a caseworker. In many cases, people were procurement was a real strength. The public able to afford to pay for improvements but health team brought experience of working on needed advice to identify what needed doing fuel poverty, understanding of the evidence Commissioning for better health outcomes 23
for what works, a picture of local needs and change her to a more competitive tariff, their NHS links to the team. Adult social care fixed for a longer period of time saving her brought their learning from running affordable approximately £96 over the course of the year. warmth programmes and direct links with Meter readings were also submitted to ensure vulnerable residents and housing were able she was not paying more than necessary. to link up other programmes through the Lightbulb Project to increase the impact. The advice of the procurement during the tender What has been learned? process on documentation, timescales and evaluation of the tenders was invaluable. Working across two tiers of local government is complex but the challenges this creates The approach being taken in Leicestershire can be overcome through building good to housing support is now more coherent and relationships, having clear goals and the affordable warmth is embedded in this and is right attitude to working together. Good seen as a key component of BCF work. governance structures and processes help with this. Having a strong partnership with clear goals helped Leicestershire to secure Case Study external funding to expand the project as they could demonstrate to funders that they knew Miss Q who lives alone in a two bedroom how to use the funding effectively. bungalow had been without suitable heating or hot water for two years as her boiler had Planning for the whole pathway from developed a fault and she could not afford the identification to the provision of support is upfront cost of repairs. A Resident Support important. Once funding was secured for Officer from her local authority referred physical improvements the programme was her via the Leicestershire First Contact able to have a bigger impact. service (a referral pathway for participating organisations to put people in touch with Evaluation is important to making the relevant services). case for sustainability and expansion of test programmes. Case studies are useful Papworth Trust contacted Miss Q and alongside the numbers for making evaluation arranged a home energy advice visit to see more real. what help could potentially be available. As Miss Q has mobility and mental health Contact conditions, the benefits she received qualified Rob Howard, her for funding that Papworth Trust hold on Consultant in Public Health, Leicestershire behalf of the Foundations Independent Living County Council Trust. Papworth Trust was able to apply to rob.howard@leics.gov.uk the SSE Warm at Home Fund and Gas Safety Charity funding to cover the majority of the Further information cost of the works to repair the boiler using a local contractor. It was also identified that Miss Q was eligible for the Warm Homes Discount (£140 credited to her electric account) and an application was submitted over the phone by contacting her supplier. At this time she was also added to the Priority Services Register as she keeps medication in the fridge which could be affected by a power cut. Additionally her supplier was able to 24 Commissioning for better health outcomes
Drink Less Enjoy More – an alcohol licensing intervention in Liverpool As part of its strategic approach to tackling message was that drunks won’t get served in alcohol-related harm in the city, Liverpool City the city and they and their friends could have Safe Partnership developed an intervention their night out cut short. Campaign messages aiming to address the culture of drunkenness were tested with the target audience and in the city centre at night and reduce levels the campaign was designed around the of intoxication. It centred on increasing lead up to the night out and the journey awareness and enforcement of the Licensing into the city centre. It included radio adverts, Act 2003 which created an offence of serving adverts in off licences, on public transport, or buying alcohol for someone who is drunk. at arrival stations and on walking routes to the Evidence from Stockholm suggested it was pubs and clubs. There was a social media possible to have a significant impact by campaign and support from the local press. implementing a multi-component intervention including public communications, police The police sent letters to all bars in the city enforcement and bar staff training. centre alerting them to the campaign and advising that they would be actively enforcing the Licensing Act legislation. Bar staff were What approach was taken? trained about the legislation and how to refuse to serve a drunk customer by Trading The City Safe Partnership worked with Standards staff. The campaign ran during Liverpool City Council Public Health team and November 2015. Liverpool CCG to fund and trial a campaign An independent evaluation of the campaign Say No to Drunks in 2014. This mainly was commissioned from Liverpool John focused on training bar staff, and to a lesser Moores University. extent police enforcement. Evaluation showed limited impact and made recommendations for an accompanying public communications campaign and for more proactive police What impact has it had? enforcement. The intervention has been independently evaluated by Liverpool John Moores University Behavioural insight work was commissioned (LJMU). They used a validated Actor Study to identify the target audiences for the public Research Tool, where actors mimic severe communications work. This identified four drunkenness whilst attempting to be served, groups of people who were at the greatest to test whether bar staff would serve alcohol. risk of alcohol-related harm: the Chardonnay The work replicated the methodology used socialite, ritual relaxer, drinkers in denial and in a previous LJMU national study in 2013. In balanced bingers. Balanced bingers were the 2013, 84 per cent of attempted purchases group who mainly drank heavily at weekends were successful, compared with only 26 per as part of their night out and were selected cent after the intervention in November 2015. as the target audience for the design of the The same method was also used in a survey intervention. in another large city in October 2015, where The group was made up mainly of 18 to 30 there was little movement from the 2013 year olds coming into the city on stag and national figure of 84 per cent. hen dos from the Liverpool City Region and A survey of night life users before the students. Their main aim was enjoyment with intervention showed that over 70 per cent friends, which far outweighed any health of participants: expected their level of concerns – hence the change of name of drunkenness to be high when they left the campaign to Drink Less Enjoy More. The core Commissioning for better health outcomes 25
You can also read