Co-Occurring Inter-relational Domestic Violence and Substance Use Disorders - Terry Gray, M.S - Naadac
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Co-Occurring Inter-relational Domestic Violence and Substance Use Disorders Presented by Terry Gray, M.S. August 23, 2017
Thomas Durham, PhD Director of Training NAADAC, the Association for Addiction Professionals www.naadac.org tdurham@naadac.org
Cost to Watch: CE Certificate Free CE Hours To obtain a CE Certificate for the time you spent watching this webinar: Available: 2 CEs 1. Watch and listen to this entire webinar. 2. Pass the online CE quiz, which is posted at CE Certificate for NAADAC www.naadac.org/co-occurring-domestic-violence-SUDs-webinar Members: Free 3. If applicable, submit payment for CE certificate or join NAADAC. CE Certificate for 4. A CE certificate will be emailed to you within 21 days of submitting Non-members: the quiz. $25
Using GoToWebinar – (Live Participants Only) Control Panel Asking Questions Audio (phone preferred) Polling Questions
Webinar Presenter Terry Gray, M.S. Licensed Substance Abuse Counselor NOPAL Counseling, LLC Your Tucson, Arizona tdgray4cg@hotmail.com
Terry Gray, M.S. Licensed Substance Abuse Counselor Terry has been providing counseling services for substance abusers, couples, and DV offenders/victims for over 40 years. He is the Founder of Cactus Counseling Associates, a private Outpatient Treatment facility in Tucson, Arizona and is now the founder, CEO, and Chief Counselor and NOPAL Counseling, LLC in Tucson, Arizona. He can be reached by e-mail at tdgray4cg@Hotmail.com
Webinar Learning Objectives 1 2 3 Identify dynamics of Identify Develop effective the interrelationship appropriate interventions of the two disorders treatment and risk level strategies
Treating Domestic Violence and Substance Use Disorders: Co-occurring Disorders? Evaluating Treatment Needs Applying Workable Strategies
Polling Question #1 In your work as a therapist, have you treated any domestic violence offenders who also have been diagnosed with a substance use disorder? Yes No
How to address Domestic Violence The proper design of public policies requires a clear and sober understanding of the nature of man and, in particular, of the extent to which that nature can be changed by plan. - J.Q. Wilson, Thinking About Crime (1983)
Interactive, NOT DIRECTLY co-occurring 85% of domestic violence incidents involve the use/abuse of some chemical substance by at least one party present The dynamics of DV and SUD are remarkably similar and are typically re-inforcements for each condition Substance Use Disorder and Domestic Violence are NOT “cause and effect” The current evolution of understanding DV and developing treatment approaches closely mirrors the history of SUD As with SUD, DV is a FAMILY problem
PREVALENCE 1 in 4 women will experience domestic violence in her lifetime 1.3 million women are victims of physical assault annually—mostly by someone they know Females 20-24 are at the greatest risk of non-fatal DV 835,000 men are victims of physical assault annually—the number from intimate partners is unknown Most domestic violence incidents are never reported On average, the first report to the police occurs after the 9th actual physical incident—frequency of non-physical incidents are unknown 11% of Lesbian women report physical abuse, while 15% of gay men report physical abuse 1-2 million elderly persons are estimated to be abused annually; only 1 of every 14 is reported
PREVALENCE (cont.) More than 3 women and 1 man are killed by intimate partners every day In 70% of intimate partner homicides, no matter which partner was killed, the woman was physically abused before the murder If a firearm is present in the residence, the likelihood of murder by weapon increases five times Between 3.3 and 10 million children witness domestic violence at some point each year Witnessing violence as children is a primary risk factor in transmitting violence to the next generation 30-60% of perpetrators of intimate partner violence also abuse the children About one-half of “Orders of Protection” are violated, as are two-thirds of “Restraining Orders”
AWARENESS Emergency Room personnel still do not routinely receive training in recognition of DV or Child abuse symptoms Many major USA metropolitan police departments now receive some level of specialized training in recognizing and managing domestic disputes—generally these involve interrogation and arrest procedures directed toward the male Most smaller police departments continue to operate with no specialized training Women’s shelters remain a well-kept secret in many metro referral systems (including “911”) Men’s shelters are virtually non-existent Shelters for abused children are rare and typically involve child welfare/CPS/foster care
Domestic Violence and the World To date, only five countries have any official recognition of Domestic Violence as an issue Only four of those five countries address DV as a legal issue Only three of those five countries address DV as treatable Remember—only 36 US states recognize Domestic Violence as a specific legal or treatment issue.
Definitions Domestic Violence is an act of abuse/violence committed by one or more persons to one or more persons within an identified family unit. It is not necessarily an act of physical contact. Not all domestic disputes are major or have the potential to become more severe over time. While Domestic Abuse/Violence often occurs in a recognizable continuum, it is not a condition that necessarily worsens with time
Common Characteristics The common stereotype of male to female DV is not as common as is often believed and is not typically an issue of men hating or depersonalizing all women. Much Domestic Violence committed by men is about men having issues with being male. Much Domestic Violence committed by women is about women having issues with being female. It may be a safe assumption that most Domestic Violence/abuse is a person having issues with themselves.
Styles of Domestic Violence Different Shades Adult versions: Male to Female Female to Male Female to Child Male to Child Parents to Child Child to Older Parent Male to Male (Gay & Straight) Female to Female (Lesbian and Straight)
Styles of Domestic Violence (cont.) More Shades Child/Youth versions: Male to Female (relationship) Female to Male (relationship) Female to Child (sibling, babysitters, etc.) Male to Child (sibling, babysitters, etc.) Child to Child (siblings, bullying, etc.) Child to Parent Male to Male Bullying (Gay & Straight) Female to Female Bullying(Lesbian and Straight)
Adult Male-perpetrated Domestic Violence Approximately 15% of Male offenders are acting from rage – poor anger skills Approximately 5% of male offenders fit the extremes of Anti-Social Personality Disorder – Psychopathic PD The majority of male offenders are much less readily categorized Approximately 85% of male-perpetrated violence is concurrent with being under the influence of a psychoactive chemical Comparatively, we know little, statistically, of female-perpetrated abuse and virtually nothing of bullying or child abuse.
Classification Forms of domestic violence typically have a primary purpose— to exert, gain, and maintain control over another person Michael P. Johnson identifies four major types of intimate partner violence: Common Couple Violence - not connected to general control behavior, but arises from a single argument in which one or both partners physically “lash out” at the other Intimate Terrorism - more common, more likely to escalate over time, more likely to involve injury, less likely to be mutual. Violent Resistance - known more as “self-defense”; violence perpetrated by victims against their abusive partner Situational Couple Violence - not control-based, but arises out of conflicts that escalate from arguments. Less frequent than other types in established relationships, can increase in frequency and become serious or life-threatening
Types of Abuse Emotional/Verbal Financial Sexual Isolation/Information Threats and Intimidation Indirect – pets, children, parents, objects Physical
Polling Question #2 Have any of your clients exhibited one or more of these types of abuse co-occurring with a substance use disorder? Yes No
Treating Domestic Conflict Persons who are involved in domestic conflicts can learn to identify the consequences and the specific nature of their actions. Intervention strategies must promote a change in both attitude and behavior. Change includes: Improved awareness of the dynamics involved Better understanding of situations in which conflict occurs Implementation of alternative beliefs and actions These areas can be integrated components of any program The effects of family conflict on children cannot be overstated, nor can the frequent correlation between family conflict and substance use disorder.
Violence and Substance Use Substance use disorder is not a cause of violent behavior Problematic substance use enables and allows violence Violence is a common correlate of Substance use disorders Substance use disorders and Violence are interrelated
Treating Substance Use Disorders Persons who are involved in substance use disorders can learn to identify the consequences and the specific nature of their actions. Intervention strategies must promote a change in both attitude and behavior. Change includes: improved awareness of the dynamics involved better understanding of situations in which drinking/using occurs implementation of alternative beliefs and actions These areas can be integrated components of any program The effects of substance use disorders on children cannot be overstated, nor can the frequent correlation between family conflict and substance abuse.
Necessities for Treatment Accurate Evaluation/Assessment Non-Judgmental Stigma Management Symptom Management Personal Awareness Accepting Responsibility Support, Support, Support Unique (non-mainstream) services
Recipe for Violence Impaired judgment + lowered inhibitions + poor decision-making + lack of impulse control + adrenaline + proper stimuli = VIOLENCE
Types of Violence Violence to self suicide self-mutilation Violence to Others “stranger” violence “acquaintance” violence Violence to Family (domestic violence) spousal abuse child abuse
Denial and Violence Violence is typically related to: blaming others lack of emotional control (highs and lows) Domestic Violence is typified after the act by: minimizing intellectualizing rationalizing excuse-making distracting altering “history”
Role of Denial Dynamics of denial are similar with both violent behavior and substance use disorders Allows individuals to explain behavior without accepting responsibility
DENIAL Types of cognitive denial Excuses Blaming Intellectualizing Labeling Minimizing Deflecting Justifying Shame Stigma Cognitive Impairment Traumatic memory and survival
SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER Trauma relief Stress relief Emotional “deadening” Social Equalizer Impact on Decision-Making and judgment Effects on Children/family
Psychoactive Chemistry Drug effects are primarily in the brain Impact is on these major areas: Cognition/Comprehension Judgment Perception Emotional experience Behavior Memory Assessment/future planning
Terry’s Law YOU CANNOT BE HIGH AND STRAIGHT SIMULTANEOUSLY “Under the Influence” means just that Count the number of brains you have Place your brain in the blender and turn to “whip” Operate normally It cannot be done Implications Domestic Violence and substance abuse are not a cause and effect relationship
Altered/Distorted Realities With each experience of being “high” reality becomes increasingly altered by the drug or drugs being used Alcohol—lowered inhibitions, impact on frontal lobe, memory, perception Marijuana—impaired perceptions, memory (short and long term), emotions Meth—impaired judgment, sleep deprivation, impaired perception, paranoia, feeling of invincibility Opiates—impaired judgment, emotional deadening Sedative/Hypnotics—lowered inhibitions, impact on frontal lobe, memory, perception, emotional deadening Cocaine—impaired judgment, paranoia, sense of superiority, sleep problems
Drug Effects/Trauma Response What happens when the frontal lobe is not engaged? Differences between motives for choice of drugs Examples: Lack of sense of personal power perhaps could lead to use of meth or cocaine Feeling overwhelmed by emotional needs could result in use of alcohol/opiates/tranquilizers While the choice of drug does not always correlate to attachment/BPD/abuse background, the likelihood is always important to assess
What do we want to know? Risk Indicators Prior incidents Arrests/convictions Substance Use Disorder Witness or victim of abuse as a child Trauma history PTSD symptoms Mental Illness Attachment/Abandonment issues Strict or dogmatic upbringing “Cluster B” symptomology (personality disorders)
Implications For Treatment Stigma Denial Stressors Trauma History Family abuse history Parental Attachment
Treatment Issues Does being judgmental help? batterer offender perpetrator wife beater combatant On the contrary: victim survivor co-combatant
Evaluation/Assessment Should Include: A recognized DV Assessment instrument A detailed Psycho-Social questionnaire Specific Domestic Violence addendum Lethality assessment Substance Use Assessment instrument Mental Health assessment (if indicated) Duty to Warn Victim ID
Polling Question #3 In your opinion, would the use of a domestic violence assessment tool be effective in gathering accurate information from a client diagnosed with a substance use disorder? Yes No
ATTACHMENT Types of attachment Secure Quality “equal” communication Insecure Inconsistent communication Avoidant Ambivalent Disorganized Declarative/Interrogative Involves the integration of brain function
ATTACHMENT ISSUES IN TREATMENT Therapeutic relationship A secure attachment that enhances and promotes the growth of trust between client and counselor A consistent environment that promotes trust between peers and enhances feedback Reliable and consistent messages Non-judgmental Repetitive Emotionally supportive
Acknowledgement Forming Personal Identity Male Dominant Cultures Forming Bonds Gender Identity Role Identity Approval
Dependency Self-Esteem Issues Role Identity damaged Emotional immaturity Outside vs. Inside measures of value Living in a continual state of tension
Cycle VICTIM'S RESPONSE: Protects self any way possible. of Violence Police called by friend, children, neighbor. Tries to calm partner. Leaves. Practices self-defense. 2. BATTERING BATTERER: Pushing, shoving, hitting, punching, choking, humiliation ,imprisonment, 1. TENSION BUILDING rape, use of weapons, beatings. BATTERER: Moody, nitpicking. Isolates 3. CALM STAGE victim. Withdraws affection. POWER & CONTROL BATTERER: Name-calling. Put-downs. DENIAL Verbally abusive, yelling. Uses Says sorry. Begs drugs or alcohol. Threatens. forgiveness. Promises to Destroys property. get counseling. Promises to go to church. Criticizes. Sullen. Promises to go to AA/be sober. Sends flowers, Crazy-making. brings gifts. VICTIM'S "I'll never do it again." Wants to make love. Declares love, devotion. Enlists RESPONSE: family support. Cries. Attempts to calm partner. VICTIM'S RESPONSE: Nurturing. Silent/talkative. Stays away from family, Agrees to stay or return. Takes partner friends, support system. Keeps children quiet. back. Attempts to stop legal proceedings. Agreeable, passive. Withdraws. Tries to reason. Sets up counseling appointment Cooks favorite dinner. Feels as if walking on for partner. Feels happy, hopeful. eggshells.
The Cycle of Violence revisited Is it really a cycle? Build-up/tension – explosion – remorse – honeymoon Most relationships change and emerge into differentiated patterns over time Cycle or evolving/evolved pattern?
Poor Empowerment/Self-Esteem State of being in constant conflict No trust in self, role, ability Seek stability via emotional contact Relationships are fleeting, untrustworthy Overly dependent on partners, yet resent Attempts to control environment and emotional content Use drugs to cope, control, compensate Drug use alleviates, then compounds emotional state Kick into primitive brain function Leads to greater efforts to control, cope, compensate Tightened downward spiral as stress increases
Complications/Coping Strategies Social presence/amiability Appears fair, but can feel overwhelming Plentiful social contacts, few real friends Typically ready to “party” Chronic over or under achiever Easily becomes defensive—”hurt feelings”
Entangled Issues Cognitive denial from DV Distorted thinking/denial from SUD Denial looks like denial and works the same way Which is worse? Alcoholic Drug addict Wife beater Child abuser Worthless Bad mother Poor provider
Three Phases of Treatment Phase One—Cognitive Re-Structuring Education Types of Abuse Personalizing the Victim(s) Power and Control Substance Use Stages of Change Denial Distorted Thinking Accepting Responsibility Detailing Personal Behavior (DV incidents)
Three Phases of Treatment (cont.) Phase Two—Self-Awareness Therapy Bonding and Attachment Button, Button, Who’s got the button? Emotional Development Communication Fear and Anger Core Beliefs Personal “Canyon” Shame and Blame Setting Goals Identity
Three Phases of Treatment (cont.) Phase Three—Skills Application Intellect over Emotion Establishing Trust Boundaries Negotiation “Walking a Mile in Your shoes” Silencing Expectations Re-Framing (new positive associations) Substance Use Disorder Treatment/Recovery Self-Inventory Impulse Regulation
CONCLUSIONS Domestic Violence involves everyone No single definition/description fits all cases No single treatment approach can be effective in every situation Domestic Violence and Substance Use Disorders are a serious and often deadly combination Intervention strategies must be designed to meet individual personality profiles as much as feasible Treatment works
References • Arntz, A. (1994).Treatment of borderline personality disorder: A challenge for cognitive-behavioral therapy. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 32(4), 419-430. • Babcock et al. Does batterers treatment work? A meta- analytic review of domestic violence treatment Clinical Psychology Review, 2003, xxx-xxx. • Bandura, A. (1979). The social learning perspective: Mechanisms of aggression. In H. Toch (Ed.). Psychology of crime and criminal justice. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. • Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147-178. • Bodnarchuk, M., Kropp, P.R., Ogloff, J.R., Hart, S.D., & Dutton, D.G. (1995). Predicting cessation of intimate assaultiveness after group treatment. Family Violence Prevention Division, Health Canada. • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1, Attachment. New York: Basic. • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss. Vol. 2, Separation. New York: Basic. • Brown, JAC (2004) hame and Domestic Violence: treatment perspectives from self psychology and affect theory. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 19(1). 39-56. • Carmen, E.H., Rieker, P.P., & Mills, I.E. (1984). Victims of violence and psychiatric illness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 378-379. • Celani, D. (1994). The illusion of love. New York: Columbia University Press. • Coleman, Valerie E. (2005) Treating the Lesbian Batterer. Journal of Aggression. 7(1-2), 159-205. • Dowd, Lynn (2001). Female Perpetrators of Partner Aggression. Journal of Aggression. 5(2) 73-104. • Duke, Alysondra & Davidson, Meghan. (2009) Same Sex Intimate partner Violence. Journal of Aggression. 18, 795-816. • Dutton, D.G. (1995). The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives, 2nd ed. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press. • Dutton, D.G. (1996). Antecedents of the abusive personality. Journal of Family Violence, 11(2), 113- 132. • Dutton, D.G., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1997). The role of early trauma in males who assault their wives. In D. Ciccetti & S.L.Toth (eds.), Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology #4. University of Rochester Press.
References • Dutton, D.G., & Starzomski, A. (1993). Perpetrator characteristics associated with women’s reports of psychological and physical abuse. Violence & Victims, 8(4), 326-335. • Dutton, D.G., Starzomski, A., Saunders, K., & Bartholomew, K. (1995). Intimacy-anger and insecure attachment as precursors of abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(15), 1367-1386. • Dutton, D. G., Bodnarchuk, M., Kropp, R., Hart, S., & Ogloff, J. (1997). Wife assault treatment and criminal recidivism: An eleven year follow-up. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 41(1), 9 – 23. • Dutton, D.G., Bodnarchuk, M., Kropp, R., Hart,S. & Ogloff, J. (1997) Client personality disorders affecting wife assault post treatment recidivism. Violence & Victims, 12(1), 37–50. • Freud, A. (1942). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York: International Universities Press. • Goldenson, Julie; Geffner, Robert; Foster, Sharon L.; Clipson, Clark R. (2007) Female Domestic Violence Offenders: Their Attachment Security, Trauma Symptoms, and Personality Organization. Violence and Victims. 22(5). 532-545. • Gunderson, J.G. (1984). Borderline personality disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press. • Hamberger, K.L., & Hastings, J.E. (1986). Characteristics of male spouse abusers: Is pychopathy part of the picture? Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA. • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G.L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476-497. • Karen, R. (1994). Becoming attached. New York: Warner Books. • Kelly, Joan B. & Johnson, Michael P. (2008). Differentiation Among Types of Intimate Partner Violence: Research Update and Implications for Interventions. Family Court Review. 46(3) 476- 99. • Kropp, P.R., Hart, S.D., Webster, C.D., & Eaves, D. (1995). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (2nd ed.). The British Columbia Institute on Family Violence - Multi-Health Systems.
References • Lewis, H.B. (1971). Shame and Guilt in Neurosis. New York: International Universities Press. • Prochaska, J.O., DiClementi, C.C., & Norcross, C.C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102-1114. • Roberts, Ph.D, Albert (1998). Battered Women and Their Families, 2nd Ed. Springer Publishing • Rosenfeld, B.D. (1992). Court-ordered treatment of spouse abuse. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, • Saunders, D.G. (1992). A typology of men who batter: Three types derived from cluster analysis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62, 264-275. • Schore, A. (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. • Shengold, L. (1989). Soul murder: The effects of childhood abuse and deprivation. Fawcett: New York. • Sherman, L.W., & Berk, R.A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272. • Starzomski, A., & Dutton, D.G. (1994). Attachment style, anger, and attribution in the intimate context. Masters’ Thesis. Unpublished manuscript. University of British Columbia. • Tweed, R., & Dutton, D.G. (1998). A comparison of impulsive and instrumental subgroups of batterers. Violence and Victims, 13(3), 1-14. • Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (1999). Revising and Assessing Axis II. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(2), 258-285. • van der Kolk, B. (1987). Psychological Trauma. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
ADDITIONAL REFERENCES Cohen, Steve. (2004) Children and Domestic Violence. Presentation. National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information Carter, Jay. (2003). Nasty People, Revised Edition. McGraw-Hill Publishing: New York. Hare, Robert D., Ph.D. (1999) Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us. Guilford Press: New York. Magid, Dr. Ken & McKelvey, Carolyn A. (1988) High Risk: Children Without A Conscience. New York: Bantam Books.
Thank You! Terry Gray, M.S. Licensed Substance Abuse Counselor NOPAL Counseling, LLC Your Tucson, Arizona tdgray4cg@hotmail.com
www.naadac.org/co-occurring-domestic-violence- SUDs-webinar
Cost to Watch: CE Certificate Free CE Hours To obtain a CE Certificate for the time you spent watching this webinar: Available: 2 CEs 1. Watch and listen to this entire webinar. 2. Pass the online CE quiz, which is posted at CE Certificate for NAADAC www.naadac.org/co-occurring-domestic-violence-SUDs-webinar Members: Free 3. If applicable, submit payment for CE certificate or join NAADAC. CE Certificate for 4. A CE certificate will be emailed to you within 21 days of submitting Non-members: the quiz. $25
Upcoming Webinars September 13 2017 October 11, 2017 Electronic Screen Addiction: Influences on Addiction and Mental Health Don’t Take My Ice Cream in the LGBT Population by Christina Migliara, LMFT, MAC, CAP, CASAC By Mary Sue Green, PhD. LMFT and Beth Donnellan, MEd, ABD, FT September 27, 2017 October 24, 2017 Addiction as a Relational Disorder: Applying Emotional Intelligence to A Neuro-Informed Treatment Perspective Recovery by Chad Luke, PhD, LPC/MHSP, NCC, ACS, MAC By Brenda Grieg, MBA, MA, LADC www.naadac.org/webinars
www.naadac.org/webinars Free CEs for Members Levels: Professional Associate Student www.naadac.org/ join
INDEPENDENT STUDY COURSES WEBINAR SERIES Earn CEs at home and at your own Over 75 CEs of free educational pace (includes study guide and webinars are available. Education online examination). credits are FREE for NAADAC members. CONFERENCES MAGAZINE ARTICLES NAADAC Annual Conference, In each issue of Advances in September 22-26, 2017, Denver, CO Addiction & Recovery, NAADAC's magazine, one article is eligible for CEs. CERTIFICATE PROGRAMS FACE-TO-FACE SEMINARS NAADAC offers face-to-face Demonstrate advanced education seminars of varying lengths in the in diverse topics with the NAADAC U.S. and abroad. Certificate Programs.
Cost to Watch: CE Certificate Free CE Hours To obtain a CE Certificate for the time you spent watching this Available: webinar: 1.5 CEs 1. Watch and listen to this entire webinar. CE Certificate for 2. Pass the online CE quiz, which is posted at NAADAC Members: www.naadac.org/value-based-reimbursements-webinar Free 3. If applicable, submit payment for CE certificate or join CE Certificate for NAADAC. Non-members: $20 4. A CE certificate will be emailed to you within 21 days of submitting the quiz.
Contact Us! NAADACorg NAADAC 44 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 301 Alexandria, VA 22314 Naadac phone: 703.741.7686 / 800.548.0497 fax: 703.741.7698 / 800.377.1136 NAADAC naadac@naadac.org www.naadac.org
Polling Question #1 Add questions and answers
Polling Question #2 Add questions and answers
Polling Question #3 Add questions and answers
Polling Question #4 Add questions and answers
You can also read