City of Greater Sudbury Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 Purpose
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 City of Greater Sudbury Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 Purpose The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s approval of the City of Greater Sudbury’s first enterprise-wide Customer Service Strategy. Background In January 2018, staff presented a report to Council entitled “Evolving Service Strategy and 311”. This report, and the subsequent presentation made to Finance and Administration Committee on February 6, provided an overview of the strategy staff are developing to establish clear expectations about the service experience people have when doing business with the City. As part of that report, staff identified that focusing on transaction-oriented business processes, including a particular focus on 311 services, will allow staff to produce a series of plans to evolve the organization’s policy, process design, technology utilization and staff training, all of which will assist us to ensure that service promises are consistently delivered. In April 2018, staff presented a report to Council entitled “Customer Service Issues and Principles”. This report presented an analysis of the issues that a corporate customer service strategy needed to address. It also identified specific principles that should be reflected in any changes to policy or processes that would be considered as part of ongoing work to enhance the organization’s customer service culture. In September 2018, staff presented a report to Council entitled “Customer Service Strategy and CRM Replacement Update”. This report provided an overview of the research and analysis conducted to support the development of the strategy being presented to Council in this report. Customer Service Strategy The Customer Service Strategy is the result of extensive research. Based on the customer service principles previously presented to Council, the strategy lays the groundwork for three years of work in strengthening a customer service culture, from 2019 to 2022. The strategy is intended as a roadmap for describing to employees what we will do to make a positive customer service culture part of the City of Greater Sudbury brand, and as a method for citizens to assess the corporation’s progress. 1
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 Customer Service Principles The customer service principles on which the customer service strategy is built are expected to address the issues identified as requiring particular attention at the City of Greater Sudbury. There are seven principles, as follows: 1. We have agreed upon standards for customer service. 2. We recruit, train and empower employees to provide great customer service and recognize those who go the extra mile. 3. We resolve issues on a first contact basis where possible. 4. Our staff are knowledgeable and consistently have the information they need to provide the right answer. 5. We are committed to measuring and improving our customer service performance. 6. We use technology to effectively leverage customer service opportunities and address customer service issues. 7. A positive customer service culture is part of the City of Greater Sudbury brand. Customer Service Vision The customer service vision describes, in a simple, straightforward way, the outcomes this strategy is expected to produce. It will provide a method for assessing progress and our effectiveness at designing and delivering staff training, new technology and new processes or process changes to support our customer service principles. The corporation’s customer service vision is: “We foster and build a service-focused culture with empowered employees who know what to do, how to do it, and who go the extra mile to provide a positive customer experience. When citizens engage with the City, they receive consistent, timely, and solution-oriented service. Respect. Excellence. Connection. Service.” The strategy infuses this vision into every aspect of the work that will be done to put the strategy into action including: recruiting, training, empowering and recognizing employees, building knowledge and service expectations, measuring progress; and, a “consistent, timely, and solution-oriented” service experience. The four words that finish the vision are values that are all-inclusive; that is, they apply to employees and citizens alike. The values are also in and of themselves bilingual, which speaks to the importance of French language services in the provision of customer service. 2
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 Focus Areas The customer service strategy includes three main focus areas for the next three years: 1. Building a service culture – focused on building and enhancing the organization’s capacity to provide great customer service. 2. Enhancing service effectiveness – focused on measuring progress against defined standards and enhancing the capacity to resolve issues at the first point of contact. 3. Service simply accessed – focused on service channels and building understanding of services across and outside the organization. Action items defined as part of the strategy those that are reasonably expected to move the mark against their respective focus area. On a broader level, however, the customer service culture that this strategy invokes is a culture of “getting to yes”. This requires careful and appropriate change management for both employees and citizens, particularly among those municipal services that incorporate regulatory requirements that are not within the City’s direct control or enforcement functions that emphasize the maintenance of community standards. Nevertheless, in all cases the goal will be to align service delivery with the customer service vision. Implementation Implementation of the strategy will begin in 2019, and regular updates will be provided to Council and to citizens as work progresses. Our primary focus in 2019 will be on training, education (internal and external), 311 call centre performance, benchmarking and standard-setting, public reporting, as well as the replacement of the City’s Customer Relationship Management system. Implementation will begin formally upon Council approval of the customer service strategy; however, it should be noted a number of administrative initiatives within staff’s direct control have already been established, particularly in the 311 area, to enhance customer service, including: 311 operators now greet citizens with their first name 311 calls are now randomly screened and reviewed with operators for quality assurance/training purposes Regular reviews are being conducted with each 311 staff member to provide ongoing coaching in alignment with criteria associated with best practice in customer service and call centre operations Additional business units are continuously being on-boarded to the customer relationship management system 3
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 Additional knowledge/information on business unit services is continually being added to the 311 knowledgebase, which enables 311 operators to handle more calls at the first point of contact A regular analysis of call volumes by time of day is being used to optimize the scheduling of staff to handle spikes in calls All 311 operators have been trained on dispatching urgent issues for immediate attention by area staff (eg. flooding, debris on road, traffic light outages, broken stop signs) A 311 training/best practice manual is under development An existing position has been re-focused on analyzing processes throughout the lifecycle of 311 service requests - from the moment they are received in 311 to the moment they are completed by the staff responsible Ongoing work with staff in other business areas to ensure that cases are kept updated in the CRM system, and so that citizens can be provided with updates on their service requests when they call 311. Conclusion The City of Greater Sudbury operates approximately 60 lines of business, and while they are all diverse, they nearly all directly influence customer service in some way. The City’s first enterprise-wide customer service strategy will allow the City to build a foundation for customer service excellence. Customer service reflects a shared responsibility between each employee and customers. There is mutual interest in ensuring expectations are understood and the corporation’s capacity to serve aligns with Council’s, and the community’s, standards. Resources Cited “Evolving Service Strategy and 311”. Report at Council meeting of January 23, 2018. http://agendasonline.greatersudbury.ca/index.cfm?pg=feed&action=file&agenda=report&itemid=5&id= 1234 “Customer Service Issues and Principles”. Report at Finance and Administration meeting of April 17, 2018. http://agendasonline.greatersudbury.ca/index.cfm?pg=agenda&action=navigator&id=1271&itemid=144 66 “Customer Service Strategy and CRM Replacement Update”. Report on Council meeting of September 11, 2018. http://agendasonline.greatersudbury.ca/index.cfm?pg=feed&action=file&attachment=24577.pdf Internal Customer Service Interview Results. 2016 City of Greater Sudbury Employee Engagement Survey Results. CityLinks. 4
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 2018 City of Greater Sudbury Customer Service Survey. www.overtoyou.greatersudbury.ca. 7th Citizens First Study.Institute for Citizen-Centred Service. 8th Citizens First Study. Institute for Citizen-Centred Service. 5
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 Appendix A: Research and Data Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to provide an overview of the research conducted and the findings informing the identification of issues related to customer service for the City of Greater Sudbury. These findings are from a number of sources, including: Approximately 70 interviews with managers from all sections of CGS (June/July 2018) Employee survey results (2016 and 2018) Data from 311 and call centre statistics The latest Citizens First reports, which identify customer service best practices (2014 and 2018) Contact with other municipalities and review of municipal customer service strategies A Customer Service Survey that was available online and at CGS service counters (summer 2018) Citizen Survey (2016 and 2018) Employee Views of Our Customer Service Capacity In the 2018 Employee Feedback Survey, “Customer Focus” placed 7th out of 13 survey measures, with 57% of employees rating it as favourable. This is 7% lower than the benchmark established by the City of Greater Sudbury’s survey provider, TalentMap. Similarly, in the 2016 Employee Feedback Survey, “Organizational Citizen Service Culture” placed 9th out of 30 survey measures, with 48.5% of employees rating it as favourable. That score was also lower than the benchmark of the survey provider, Metrics@Work, with a different score of 13%. The driver was proportionally more important to frontline employees, who generally see a need for change in the corporation’s customer service approach. As data from the Institute for Citizen-Centred Services (ICCS) shows, the relatively low overall placement of “customer service culture” in the employee survey in the list of important issues is an indicator of a need for change. High-performing organizations place a high value on, and understand how to influence, customer service culture. Based on feedback from employees, when an internal community engagement task force was established in 2015, it was quickly expanded to include customer service as these were seen to be intrinsically linked. Work conducted in that group identified a number of themes associated with what was perceived as an organizational gap related to customer service and community engagement. These themes were: the ability to respond quickly and consistently to issues, the availability of processes to support consistent responsiveness, the availability of appropriate training for staff on facilitation, 6
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 conflict resolution, customer service, and engagement, and the need for ongoing education to citizens about what they can expect from the City. One-on-one interviews were conducted with representatives from nearly each organizational area of the City of Greater Sudbury to gather data on current customer service practices. The interviews demonstrated that key elements associated with improved customer service included: enhanced information sharing, as well as an enhanced community understanding on service expectations. Additionally, many sections indicated that misdirected requests, not knowing who to contact or not understanding what other areas do is a current barrier to good customer service. All of tese areas of concern are being addressed through goals and actions items of the Customer Service Strategy, such as customer service training and the implementation of an internal knowledgebase. Citizen Views of Our Customer Service Capacity In 2016, the City conducted a citizen perception survey, which surveyed 1,200 random households for levels of satisfaction with local quality of life and opinions on municipal services. Half of residents that were surveyed (50%) said they had need of some kind of customer service contact with the City over the previous year. A large majority of the customer service contact over the previous year was via telephone – in fact, more than three-quarters of residents who contacted the City had contact by telephone (77%). Most residents were satisfied with the customer service they received. 78% of residents were either ‘very’ satisfied (47%) or ‘somewhat’ satisfied (31%). This perception to some extent points to a need to delve more deeply into the citizen experience of the City’s customer service capacity. As an example of how other data may mitigate the findings of the Citizen Survey, the ICCS report establishes that one of the key drivers of customer satisfaction is timeliness of response: regular feedback received to the City of Greater Sudbury indicates that there is an opportunity to enhance our consistency in the delivery of accurate information. As part of the development of the Customer Service Strategy, a public survey was conducted in the summer of 2018 to gather recent data and open-ended responses specific to customer service. While there was a low response rate to this survey, the results were similar to the Citizen Survey. Seventy percent of respondents indicated that they were satisfied or very satisfied – and a lack of timely response from staff was the most common concern from citizens. The qualitative feedback received about the City’s performance at a general level through different mechanisms (eg, through social media, media stories, calls to staff, letters to the editor, public engagement sessions, anecdotal evidence) reflects a neutral to negative perception of the City’s capacity to deliver service. This can reasonably be considered to extend to our capacity to deliver 7
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 customer service. Employees and residents alike feel that there are opportunities to enhance the culture and knowledge around customer service. 311 Data and Call Centre Statistics The City’s 311 service is one of the first points of contact with residents across the community, providing first-contact customer service on over 20,000 calls and 400 @311 emails each month. The 311 Call Centre is staffed by 7 full-time Call Centre Representatives, supplemented by 3 part-time positions, as well as a Manager of 311 and Customer Service, a 311 Quality Assurance and Training Coordinator and a 311 Process Improvement Officer. Calls are answered by 311 staff between 8 am and 4:30 pm, with non- 911 emergency after-hours service (eg, flooding, sinkholes, traffic light outages) provided by a third party contractor. There is a significant volume of data that is available about the 311 system, including: Calls – volume, topic, department, number of calls after hours Type of call – transfer, service request, information Customer experience – on-hold time, call abandonment rate, first call resolution rate CRM service requests – resolution on time, case escalation rate, late resolution Call centre performance – agent active time, agent talk time. An average of data pulled from 311 over the last year shows that the rate of CRM cases closed on time varies significantly from one department to the next. This is reflective of the fact that different departments have different standards for “closing” a case, as well as different definitions of what “closing” a case means. Some data for the past 12 months from 311 is as follows: For the 12 Month period of st st (September 1 2017 – August 31 2018) # of calls answered by 311 216,464 (average of 18,038/month) % first call resolution 41% % direct transfers by name/extension 24% French Calls 3.80% July 10 Heaviest Day 1207 calls answered Average Talk Time 1:02mins % Abandoned Calls 4.16% Active Time per day 52.02% active (talk time & after-call work) 33.67% on calls (talk time) 8
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 Calls Answered After Threshold (20 14.62% seconds) Calls Abandoned After Threshold 3.26% Solid Waste Roads Department Tax Department Building Services Top 5 Calls by Department By-law Enforcement # of calls received After Hours 32,974 # of ACR case created by 311 33255 Blue Box Request Potholes Green Cart Request Plowing Garbage Collection Top 5 ACR Case Types Emails Received @311 (started tracking in 5,707 May 2017) Best Practice Assessing “best practice” included a review of other municipalities and organizations that have reviewed their customer service approaches and established customer service strategies. These include: Windsor, Ajax, Barrie, Brantford, Brampton, Regina, Markham, Kawartha Lakes, Oshawa, Kingston, Burlington, Winnipeg and Halton Region. Common themes found as part of this best practice review include: Consistency across channels: organizations embarking on customer service strategies recognize the importance of ensuring a seamless experience for the customer, regardless of which channel they use to engage with the municipality (ie, website, telephone, email, in person). It is customer service best practice to resolve as many calls as possible at the first point of contact. Most municipalities are continuously working to have the knowledge in 311 to resolve more calls on behalf of departments. Several municipalities have knowledgebases, which are a centralized source of reliable and accurate information across the corporation. Role clarity and staff empowerment: organization leaders must be role models when it comes to customer service and understand and support a customer-oriented service standard. This is demonstrated in several ways, especially with training and tools for staff who deliver customer 9
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 service, and by processes and a culture where staff are empowered to make decisions “in the moment” about how to provide excellent customer service. Many municipalities recognize employees who go the extra mile to provide good customer service, in order to reward their efforts and to set examples for other staff Timeliness: there is a substantive focus on standards designed to ensure that responses are provided within a reasonable timeframe and that issue resolution is timely. This is supported by a framework to guide the consistent provision of quality customer service. Several of the municipalities surveyed have formal service standards. The standards are set corporately (eg. “External emails will receive a response within two business days”). The standards are meant to represent response or service delivery expectations under normal operation. Rigorous measurement and benchmarking: organizations that excel at customer service measure and evaluate the customer experience within their organization. This includes regular surveys using a variety of tools such as mystery shoppers and quantitative data such as first call resolution ratios. Access: several examples exist of municipalities enhancing the customer experience by adopting different operating hours (a review of 311 operating hours is currently underway), expanded services at some locations, and “one-stop shop” counters. This is consistent with, for example, the City of Greater Sudbury’s current approach of using Citizen Service Centres throughout the community in various municipal service buildings. Most municipalities plan to leverage technology more in the coming years. For instance, citizens want more options to pay their bills, register for programs and submit applications online. 311 Chat is currently emerging as a channel option in other municipalities, and is typically the channel with the highest level of customer satisfaction and the lowest effort. Staff also interviewed several other municipalities and conducted a site visit at Halton Region. Halton is an example of a municipality that is recognized for its customer service excellence. It has been awarded the Service Quality Measurement (SQM) Group’s annual award for the highest customer service in government, for a number of years. This recognizes government organizations based on their rate of First Call Resolution (FCR) – which is the number of calls required to resolve an issue, answer a question or receive a requested service. The data from Halton reflects a high performing call centre: 90% of Halton Region callers made only one call to get their matter resolved. The average top performing call centre FCR score is 84% and the average government FCR score is 76%. 92% of callers were satisfied overall with their call centre experience. 96% of customers were satisfied overall with the customer service representative who handled their call. 10
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 Citizens First Study The ICCS is a Canadian institute established in the late 1990s to sustain and further develop efforts to improve citizen satisfaction with public sector service delivery in Canada. The Citizens First study is a study that has been conducted every couple of years since 1998. It establishes measures with respect to citizens’ satisfaction with and expectations of service from Canadian government, at all levels. The Citizens First 8 report notes that the five drivers of client satisfaction that represent the greatest opportunity to improve the service experience are: Issue Resolution/Future Issues Timely Help Timeliness Extra Mile Access (Telephone) According to the Citizens First 8 report, more should be done by governments to manage client expectations for service delivery. It improves customer service overall and also reduces the amount of complaints and call backs from citizens, which could increase staff efficiency. The study also outlines the difference between service standards and service expectations – for instance: Most expect to get required information or start a transaction within 7 minutes on the phone, but actual government services do not always meet this expectation.The average number of minutes Canadians are willing to search for information for a routine service on a government website is 5 minutes which reflects a shift toward even shorter times in the most recent study. Since 2016, the usage of the phone channel for government service is remaining steady. The usage of digital services (online and email) is slightly increasing, and in-person visits are slightly decreasing. Half of online service users are interested in using social media to connect with government and two thirds of citizens agree that they would check to see if services are available online before going in-person or phoning. Research Summary Generally speaking, the research can be summarized with the following themes. 1. Customer Service Culture: a. Employees and residents alike feel that organizational culture/attitude should be improved. 11
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 b. Most residents are satisfied with the current level of customer service provided by the City. In the 2016 Citizen Survey, 78% of citizens were very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the customer service they receive from the City. In the recent public Customer Service Survey, 70% of citizens were satisfied or very satisfied (it is worth noting there was a low response rate to this survey). A lack of timely response from staff was the most common concern from citizens. c. CGS Staff ranked “Customer service culture” low in importance in the 2016 employee feedback survey. The Citizens First reports show that the relatively low overall placement of in the list of important issues is an indicator of a need for change. High-performing organizations place a high value on, and understand how to influence, customer service culture. d. Many municipalities recognize employees who go the extra mile to provide good customer service, in order to reward their efforts and to set examples for other staff. e. According to Citizens First 8, the drivers which have the most potential to impact customer satisfaction are: Issue Resolution/Future Issues, Timely Help, Timeliness, Extra Mile and Access (Telephone). 2. Customer Service Standards: a. According to the Citizens First 8 report, more should be done by governments to manage client expectations for service delivery. It improves customer service overall and also reduces the amount of complaints and call backs from citizens, which could increase staff efficiency. b. Several of the municipalities surveyed have formal service standards. The standards are set corporately (eg. “External emails will receive a response within two business days”). The standards are meant to represent response or service delivery expectations under normal operation. c. Some divisions have long-standing norms that address aspects of what would be included in a corporate set of standards, but these have not traditionally been communicated to the public. d. Norms regarding customer service standards for email or phone transactions do not yet exist across the organization. This will be addressed in the Customer Service Strategy. 3. Training and Procedures: a. Many municipalities are implementing customer service training which is required to be taken by all existing and new staff. The training typically includes best practices, dealing with difficult customers and a section dedicated to issues that might be encountered for specific jobs. b. Resource allocation decisions did not historically sufficiently address corporate customer service needs, resulting in inadequate training for staff and inconsistent service experiences. c. Escalations and complaints are handled differently across the organization. 12
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 4. Technology: a. Most municipalities plan to leverage technology more in the coming years. For instance, citizens want more options to pay their bills, register for programs and submit applications online. b. There is an opportunity to more fully and effectively utilize the City’s Customer Relationship Management system. c. 311 Chat is currently emerging as a channel option in other municipalities, and is typically the channel with the highest level of customer satisfaction and the lowest effort. d. According to Citizens First 8: “Online and social media provide government and citizens the opportunity to connect in new ways. Governments should take advantage of these opportunities, while still continuing to connect with citizens who have not adopted new technology using more traditional channels.” 5. Knowledge/Information Sharing: a. CGS sections indicated that improving information sharing, communication or education about their services would help them to provide better customer service. b. Many sections indicated that misdirected requests, not knowing who to contact or not understanding what other areas do is a current barrier to good customer service. c. Several municipalities have knowledgebases, which are a centralized source of reliable and accurate information across the corporation. The City currently has a knowledgebase for 311, but there is a lot of potential for it to be improved on and used by other sections of the City. 6. 311 Call Centre a. Many municipalities have a dial-by-name directory, which allows citizens to reach known staff without having to wait in the call queue and reduces the amount of time operators spend handling direct transfers (which currently account for 25% of calls to our 311 service). b. It is customer service best practice to resolve as many calls as possible at the first point of contact. Most municipalities are continuously working to have the knowledge in 311 to resolve more calls on behalf of departments. Depending on the number of calls being moved to the call centre, sometimes staff are transitioned to 311 to increase capacity to handle those calls. c. After hours, the City’s emergency calls (eg. flooding, traffic light outages, sinkholes) are currently handled by a contractor, but the contractor does not always have the knowledge/ability to handle requests for information about City services and less urgent requests for service (eg. missed garbage collection, requests for by-law information). A review of 311 operating hours is underway. 13
Customer Service Strategy 2019-2022 14
You can also read