BEHAVIOR IN SPORTS ACTIVITY AMIDST PANDEMIC OF STUDENT-ATHLETES OF LYCEUM OF THE PHILIPPINES UNIVERSITY, CAVITE

 
CONTINUE READING
BEHAVIOR IN SPORTS ACTIVITY AMIDST PANDEMIC OF STUDENT-ATHLETES OF LYCEUM OF THE PHILIPPINES UNIVERSITY, CAVITE
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016        ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
       EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
    Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                          - Peer Reviewed Journal

 BEHAVIOR IN SPORTS ACTIVITY AMIDST PANDEMIC
    OF STUDENT-ATHLETES OF LYCEUM OF THE
        PHILIPPINES UNIVERSITY, CAVITE

                                           Renato S. Tanglao Jr.
         Graduate School, Laguna State Polytechnic University, Santa Cruz, Laguna, Philippines

                                                               Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra7461
                                                                                    DOI No: 10.36713/epra7461

                                                    ABSTRACT
This study determined the behavior in sports activity of student-athletes of Lyceum of the Philippines University,
Cavite. Specifically, the study sought answers to the following questions: What is the status of profile of student-
athletes of the Lyceum of the Philippines University, Cavite in terms of; age; sex; gender; sports event? What is the
level of behavior of students-athlete in terms of: physical activity; emotional Behavior; social activity; psychological?
What is the level of sports activity in terms of: training; coaching; tune up games; competition? Is the demographic
profile of the student athletes has a significant effect in the sports activity? Is the behavior of the student has a
significant effect in the sports activity?
          In order to conduct this study, letters was sent to Ms. Kimberly Joy E.
Alcaraz OIC Head, Research and Publications Office and the University Headmaster, Mr. Mhar Angelo A. Bayot
asking permission and approval to conduct the study.
          Permission from the OIC Head, Research and Publications Office and university headmaster for each
department. Preparation of self-made questionnaire by the researcher followed in order to obtain the necessary data on
the behavior in sports activity amidst pandemic of student-athletes of Lyceum of the Philippines University, Cavite.
The respondents of the study included approximately fifty (50) student-athletes of different event enrolled in the
Lyceum of the Philippines University, Cavite. The copies were multiples and others sent by the google form
considering the health protocols. The main source of data which prepared by the researcher were statistically use a
simple descriptive statistic such as T-test formula and the weighted mean to determine the mean level to know the
behavior in sports activity amidst pandemic of student-athletes of Lyceum of the Philippines, Cavite. readiness of the
student-athletes to the new normal sports competition participated by the Cavite.

I. INTRODUCTION
         As most sports seasons, practices and camps have been canceled in all area due to the coronavirus
    pandemic, many athletes, including high school and college seniors, may be experiencing a sense of loss and
    resentment. Psychological science faces a call to action researching the implications of the corona virus disease
    2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Rapid reviews have reported that maintaining rigorous research standards is a
    priority for the field, such as ensuring reliable and valid measurement, when investigating peoples experience of
    COVID-19, O’Connor et al., (2020).
         This pandemic has caused many events in our environment around the world. And one of the most severely
    affected are athletes who experience different emotions caused by stopping regular training and competition.
    All ages for different reasons, high school kids are impacted in a multitude of ways; they are undergoing
    hormonal changes and use sports as a way to help reduce stress and control anxiety and depression. Also, sports
    are a way to earn college scholarships so there can be increased pressure.

                          2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016   | www.eprajournals.com |254   |
BEHAVIOR IN SPORTS ACTIVITY AMIDST PANDEMIC OF STUDENT-ATHLETES OF LYCEUM OF THE PHILIPPINES UNIVERSITY, CAVITE
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016          ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
         EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
    Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                            - Peer Reviewed Journal

    Much of this work highlights a link between the athlete environment and experiences of depression and anxiety.
    For example, serious injury causing early retirement and loss of identity, organizational-level pressures and
    occupational demands, public scrutiny of performance and person, have all been linked with mental health
    disorders (Foskett and Longstaff, 2018).
         For younger children, sports are often a way to socialize and build upon those skills. When school and
    other social interactions have been taken away, not having sports can cause a child to feel isolated. Definitely
    see sports changing, but how they change is hard to predict. We can look at other countries and see how they
    are beginning to roll sports back out. Most likely games will be played without fans on a professional level to
    start. Then when fans do return, they will most likely require wearing a mask and other social
    distancing measures. Players on the bench will most likely be six feet apart as well. Sports may opt not to do
    any handshakes or high fives as well. That is, measurement assumptions are critical for the field moving
    forward ensuring confidence in findings which may inform policy, and training.
         Through this, the aim of this research was to analyze the behavior in sports activity amidst pandemic of
    student-athletes of Lyceum of the Philippines University, Cavite.

II. OBJECTIVES
     This study determined the behavior in sports activity amidst pandemic of student-athletes of Lyceum of the
Philippines University, Cavite. Specifically, the study sought answers to the following questions:

    1.    What is the STATUS OF PROFILE of student-athletes of the Lyceum of the Philippines University, Cavite
          IN terms of;
          1.1 Age;
          1.2 Sex;
          1.3 Gender;
          1.4 Sports Event?

    2.    What is the level of behavior of students-athlete in terms of:
          2.1 Physical activity;
          2.2 Emotional Behavior;
          2.3 Social Activity ;
          2.4Psychological?

    3.    What is the level of sports activity in terms of :
          3.1 Training;
          3.2 Coaching;
          3.3 Tune up games;
          3.4 Competition?

    4.    Is the demographic profile of the student athletes has a significant effect in the sports activity?

    5.    Is the behavior of the student has a significant effect in the sports activity?

III. METHODOLOGY
         The researcher consulted her statistician on the sampling techniques. Purposive sampling, also known as
    judgmental, selective, or subjective sampling, is a form of non-probability sampling in which researcher rely on
    their own judgment when choosing members of the population to participate in their study. This sampling
    method requires researchers to have prior knowledge about the purpose of their studies so that they can properly
    choose and approach eligible participants. Researchers use purposive sampling when they want to access a
    particular subset of people, as all participants of a study are selected because they fit a particular profile. Each
    individual was chosen entirely by chance and each member of the population has an equal chance of being
    included in the sample. The respondents of the study included approximately fifty (50) student-athletes of
    different event enrolled in the Lyceum of the Philippines University, Cavite

                           2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016    | www.eprajournals.com |255   |
BEHAVIOR IN SPORTS ACTIVITY AMIDST PANDEMIC OF STUDENT-ATHLETES OF LYCEUM OF THE PHILIPPINES UNIVERSITY, CAVITE
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016       ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
    EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
 Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                           - Peer Reviewed Journal

      In order to conduct this study, letters was sent to the University Headmaster, Mr. Mhar Angelo A. Bayot
 asking permission and approval to conduct the study.
      Permission from the university headmaster for each department. Preparation of self-made questionnaire by
 the researcher followed in order to obtain the necessary data on the behavior in sports activity amidst pandemic
 of student-athletes of Lyceum of the Philippines University, Cavite.
 The researcher-made questionnaire was checked by the thesis adviser. Face validation of the contents of the
 questionnaire was done by the adviser of the researcher and other panel members in the researchers list. They
 are vital panel members of the research department.
      The copies of the questionnaire was multiplied based from the number of the respondents. Then it was
 administered. With confidentiality, the gathered information was transferred in a tally sheet. Subsequently,
 codes was assigned to each indicator. The encoded data was given to the researcher’s statistician for the
 descriptive analysis. The gathered data was interpreted and presented in textual and tabular forms and
 appropriate interpretation was made.
      The following statistical tools were used in order to analyze and interpret the gathered data:
 Descriptive statistics will be going to apply to properly derive information and frequency distributions of the
 gathered data.
 The respondents will be identified using the Slovin’s formula: n (sample size) = N (population) / 1 + N
 (population) x e2 (margin of error at 0.05 squared). The answers of the respondents on the evaluation about the
 conducting study behavior in sports activity amidst pandemic of student-athletes of Lyceum of the Philippines
 University, Cavite is going to be analyze using the following formulas and measurements:
 Weighted mean - used to find out the average responses of the respondents as measurement of the central
 tendency.

       T-Test Formula - The formula for the two-sample t-test (a.k.a. the Student's t-test) is shown below. In
 this formula, t is the t-value, x1 and x2 are the means of the two groups being compared, s2 is the pooled standard
 error of the two groups, and n1 and n2 are the number of observations in each of the groups. T-test is used to
 know if there is a behavior in sports activity amidst pandemic of student-athletes of Lyceum of the Philippines
 University, Cavite significant effect to the sports activity and behavior of the student-athletes of the Lyceum of
 the Philippines University, Cavite.

 IV.       RESULT AND DISCUSSION
      This chapter deals with the presentation, analysis and interpretation of data gathered to answer the sub
 problem relative to the main problem of this study on behavior in sports activity of amidst pandemic of student-
 athletes. This part discusses the findings of the study based on the research questions.

 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE STUDENT-ATHELETES
     Figure 2 shows the status of the student-athletes of the Lyceum of the Philippines University, Cavite in
 terms of Age.

                       2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016   | www.eprajournals.com |256   |
BEHAVIOR IN SPORTS ACTIVITY AMIDST PANDEMIC OF STUDENT-ATHLETES OF LYCEUM OF THE PHILIPPINES UNIVERSITY, CAVITE
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016       ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
      EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
    Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                          - Peer Reviewed Journal

         Graph shows that ages “17 to 20 years old” have the highest frequency of forty-one (41) or 82.00% of the
    total respondent. And have eight (8) or 16.00% of the respondent are “13 to 16 years old”. While the ages “21
    years old and above” received the lowest frequency of one (1) or 2.00% of the total respondents
         Figure 3 below shows the status of the student athletes of the Lyceum of the Philippines University Cavite
    in terms of Sex.

Graph shows that sex “Male” has the highest frequency of forty-three (43) or 86.00% of the total respondent. While
the sex “Female” received the lowest frequency of seven (7) or 14.00% of the total respondents.

Figure 4 Status of profile of the student-athletes of the Lyceum of the Philippines University, Cavite in terms of
Gender.

                         2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016   | www.eprajournals.com |257   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016       ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
      EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
    Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                          - Peer Reviewed Journal

                  Graph shows that gender “Masculine” has the highest frequency of forty-one (41) or 82.00% of
        the total respondent. And have six (6) or 12.00% of the respondent are “Feminine”. While the gender
        “Bisexual” received the lowest frequency of one (1) or 2.00% of the total respondents.

        Figure 5 Demographic profile of student-athlete of the Lyceum of the Philippines University, Cavite in
        terms of sports events.

Graph shows that the event “Basketball” has the highest frequency of sixteen (16) or 32.00% of the total
respondent. And have thirteen (13) or 26.00% of the respondent are in “Volleyball”. While the event “Badminton
and Taekwondo” received the lowest frequency of three (3) or 6.00% of the total respondents
               Table 1. Level of the behavior of the student-athlete in terms of Physical activity
                                 Statements                         Mean        SD        Remarks
        1. Go for a 30 mins walk at least three times a week.       4.58        0.54      Always
        2. I do biking as part of exercise.                         4.48        0.61      Always
        3. I walk to grocery stores in an immediate time.           4.62        0.49      Always
        4. I walk to school for an important matter.                4.56        0.50      Always
        5. I do house works as an exercise                          4.70        0.46      Always
        Overall Mean = 4.59
        Standard Deviation = 0.525
        Verbal Interpretation = Very High

                         2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016   | www.eprajournals.com |258   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016        ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
       EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
    Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                          - Peer Reviewed Journal

          Table 1 shows the result on level of the behavior of the student-athlete in terms of Physical activity. Based
on the respondents’ perceptions, the level of the behavior of the student-athlete in terms of Physical activity was
generally very high. They do house works as an exercise have (M=4.70, SD=0.46) and walk to grocery stores in an
immediate time with (M=4.62, SD=0.49). They do bike as part of exercise with (M=4.48, SD=0.61); and this item
got the lowest rating. All item indicators got a verbal interpretation of very high, as disclosed by the overall mean of
4.59 and supported with standard deviation value of 0.525.

               Table 2. Level of the behavior of the student-athlete in terms of Emotional behavior
                                   Statements                          Mean      SD      Remarks
         1. I secure my future by means of pursuing their education                      Always
                                                                       4.58      0.50
         amidst pandemic.
         2. I consider the advice of the LGU to stay at home in the                      Always
                                                                       4.52      0.50
         announcement of ECQ.
         3. I monitor the health status of family members.             4.56      0.50    Always
         4. I’Il find time to do the meditation for relaxation         4.52      0.50    Always
         5. I talk to a trusted friend to express the feeling of being                   Always
                                                                       4.56      0.50
         hurt, happy and lonely.
         Overall Mean = 4.55
         Standard Deviation = 0.499
         Verbal Interpretation = Very High

         Table 2 shows the level of the student behavior in terms of behavior. Based on the respondents’
perceptions, the level of the behavior of the student-athlete in terms of Emotional behavior was generally very high.
They secure future by means of pursuing their education amidst pandemic have (M=4.58, SD=0.50) and monitor the
health status of family members and talk to a trusted friend to express the feeling of being hurt, happy and lonely
with (M=4.56, SD=0.50). They consider the advice of the LGU to stay at home in the announcement of ECQ and
find time to do the meditation for relaxation with (M=4.52, SD=0.50); and this item got the lowest rating. All item
indicators got a verbal interpretation of very high, as disclosed by the overall mean of 4.55 and supported with
standard deviation value of 0.499.

                 Table 3. Level of the behavior of the student-athlete in terms of Social activity.
                                Statements                             Mean        SD          Remarks
      1.I meet friends for some small talk practicing the social                                 Always
                                                                        4.70       0.50
      distancing.
      2. I eat outside like picnics in observance of physical                                    Always
                                                                        4.66       0.50
      distancing.
      3. I play outside in my sports discipline with friends.           4.74       0.40          Always
      4. I attend occasions with precautionary measures and                                      Always
                                                                        4.68       0.50
      protocols observance.
      5. I do the group work assigned by the teachers with                                       Always
                                                                        4.68       0.50
      classmates.
      Overall Mean = 4.69
      Standard Deviation = 0.463
      Verbal Interpretation = Very High

         Table 3 shows the level of the behavior of the student-athlete in terms of social activity. Based on the
respondents’ perceptions, the level of the behavior of the student-athlete in terms of Social activity was generally
very high. They play outside in sports discipline with friends have (M=4.74, SD=0.40) and meet friends for some
small talk practicing the social distancing with (M=4.70, SD=0.50). They eat outside like picnics in observance of
physical distancing with (M=4.66, SD=0.50); and this item got the lowest rating. All item indicators got a verbal
interpretation of very high, as disclosed by the overall mean of 4.69 and supported with standard deviation value of
0.463.

                          2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016   | www.eprajournals.com |259   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016       ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
      EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
    Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                          - Peer Reviewed Journal

              Table 4. Level of the behavior of the student-athlete in terms of Psychological aspect
                                   Statements                          Mean     SD       Remarks
         1. I think the best way to relive the feeling of insecurity.  4.74     0.40     Always
         2. I stay strong in times of trials.                          4.72     0.50     Always
         3. I find solution for the certain problems encountered.      4.74     0.40     Always
         4. I fight the feeling of anxiety and depression by means of                    Always
                                                                       4.78     0.40
         doing things that could relax me.
         5. I go to a place that I could appreciate the value of life. 4.76     0.43     Always
         Overall Mean = 4.75
         Standard Deviation = 0.435
         Verbal Interpretation = Very High

         Table 4 show the data of the level of the behavior of the student-athlete in terms of Psychological aspect.
Based on the respondents’ perceptions, the level of the behavior of the student-athlete in terms of Psychological
aspect was generally very high. They fight the feeling of anxiety and depression by means of doing things that could
relax have (M=4.78, SD=0.40) and go to a place that I could appreciate the value of life with (M=4.76, SD=0.43).
They stay strong in times of trials with (M=4.72, SD=0.50); and this item got the lowest rating. All item indicators
got a verbal interpretation of very high, as disclosed by the overall mean of 4.75 and supported with standard
deviation value of 0.435.

                                Table 5. Level of sports activity in terms of Training
                                     Statements                            Mean      SD          Remarks
         1. I check the body temperature with the use of thermometer                              Always
                                                                            4.78     0.40
         before the training.
         2. I do the cardio exercise such as running/ jogging to                                  Always
                                                                            4.72     0.50
         maintain the endurance.
         3. I do the strengthening exercise, or resistance training,                              Always
                                                                            4.78     0.40
         such as push ups and using the dumbbells.
         4. I use the agility test for the measurement and maintenance                            Always
                                                                            4.70     0.50
         of the workouts.
         5. I do regular training in my specific sports discipline in                             Always
                                                                            4.68     0.47
         preparation for the new normal competition.
         Overall Mean = 4.73
         Standard Deviation = 0.444
         Verbal Interpretation = Very High

         Table 5 shows the result of the Level of sports activity in terms of Training. Based on the respondents’
perceptions, the level of sports activity in terms of Training was generally very high. They check the body
temperature with the use of thermometer before the training and do the strengthening exercise, or resistance
training, such as push ups and using the dumbbells have (M=4.78, SD=0.40) and do the cardio exercise such as
running/ jogging to maintain the endurance with (M=4.72, SD=0.50). They do regular training in my specific
sports discipline in preparation for the new normal competition with (M=4.68, SD=0.47); and this item got the
lowest rating. All item indicators got a verbal interpretation of very high, as disclosed by the overall mean of 4.73
and supported with standard deviation value of 0.444.

                         2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016   | www.eprajournals.com |260   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016       ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
      EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
    Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                          - Peer Reviewed Journal

                                  Table 6. Level of sports activity in terms of Coaching
                                  Statements                            Mean       SD            Remarks
        1. I am democratic to all teammates that gives the team                                   Always
        freedom and accountability, with the coach stepping in           4.72     0.50
        only when needed to keep the process going
        2. I talk to each other and decide what to do and when and                                Always
                                                                         4.72     0.50
        how to do it.
        3. I teach life skills in hopes towards developing positive                               Always
                                                                         4.76     0.40
        relationships with each other.
        4. I know how to tap into the individual strength to get the                              Always
                                                                         4.74     0.40
        most out of them
        5. I get the greatest amount of productivity from the team,                               Always
                                                                         4.68     0.47
        collectively and individually.
        Overall Mean = 4.72
        Standard Deviation = 0.448
        Verbal Interpretation = Very High

          Table 6 Level of sports activity in terms of Coaching. Based on the respondents’ perceptions, the level of
sports activity in terms of Coaching was generally very high. They teach life skills in hopes towards developing
positive relationships with each other have (M=4.76, SD=0.40) and know how to tap into the individual strength to
get the most out of them with (M=4.78, SD=0.40). They get the greatest amount of productivity from the team,
collectively and individually with (M=4.68, SD=0.47); and this item got the lowest rating. All item indicators got a
verbal interpretation of very high, as disclosed by the overall mean of 4.72 and supported with standard deviation
value of 0.448.
                             Table 7. Level of sports activity in terms of Tune up games
                                   Statements                            Mean       SD        Remarks
          1. I get familiarized with the surroundings and the                                  Always
                                                                           4.76    0.40
          competition venue.
          2. I set the mind and goals for clear and well performance                           Always
                                                                           4.72    0.50
          for the friendly game competition.
          3. I build confidence and increase chance of positive                                Always
                                                                           4.68    0.50
          performance outcome.
          4. I stay focused and optimistic.                                4.72    0.50        Always
          5. I prepare meal plan and follow religiously the coach                              Always
                                                                           4.68    0.47
          advise for the win.
          Overall Mean = 4.71
          Standard Deviation = 0.454
          Verbal Interpretation = Very High

         Table 7 shows the data of the level of sports activity in terms of Tune up games. Based on the respondents’
perceptions, the level of sports activity in terms of Tune up games was generally very high. They get familiarized
with the surroundings and the competition venue have (M=4.76, SD=0.40) and set the mind and goals for clear and
well performance for the friendly game competition and stay focused and optimistic with (M=4.72, SD=0.50). They
build confidence and increase chance of positive performance outcome and prepare meal plan and follow
religiously the coach advise for the win with (M=4.68, SD=0.50, 0.47); and this item got the lowest rating. All item
indicators got a verbal interpretation of very high, as disclosed by the overall mean of 4.71 and supported with
standard deviation value of 0.454.

                         2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016   | www.eprajournals.com |261   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016        ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
       EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
    Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                          - Peer Reviewed Journal

                             Table 8. Level of sports activity in terms of Competition
                                  Statements                          Mean     SD              Remarks
         1. I relax and pray before the competition.                  4.76     0.40            Always
         2. I visualize winning the game.                             4.74     0.40            Always
         3. I get enough sleep to boost energy and stay healthy.      4.72     0.50            Always
         4. I know the rules, give my best and apply what I trained.  4.80     0.40            Always
         5. I instill sportsmanship, and do the right thing before,                            Always
                                                                      4.82     0.39
         during and after the game.
         Overall Mean = 4.77
         Standard Deviation = 0.423
         Verbal Interpretation = Very High

          Table 8 shows the data results of the level of sports activity in terms of Competition. Based on the
respondents’ perceptions, the level of sports activity in terms of Competition was generally very high. They instill
sportsmanship, and do the right thing before, during and after the game have (M=4.82, SD=0.39) and know the
rules, give the best and apply what they trained with (M=4.80, SD=0.40). They get enough sleep to boost energy
and stay healthy with (M=4.72, SD=0.50); and this item got the lowest rating. All item indicators got a verbal
interpretation of very high, as disclosed by the overall mean of 4.77 and supported with standard deviation value of
0.423.
        Table 9. Significant effect of the demographic profile of the student-athlete to the sports activity
  Age                                                   Beta        t-value      p-value        Analysis
      Training                                          0.051       0.043        0.966          Not Significant
      Coaching                                          -0.95       -0.554       0.582          Not Significant
      Tune up games                                     0.885       0.486        0.629          Not Significant
      Competition                                       -0.282      -0.333       0.740          Not Significant
  Sex
      Training                                          0.344       0.581        0.564          Not Significant
      Coaching                                          -1.596      -1.798       0.079          Not Significant
      Tune up games                                     2.554       2.837        0.007          Significant
      Competition                                       -2.056      -4.910       0.000          Significant
  Gender
      Training                                          0.982       0.405        0.688          Not Significant
      Coaching                                          -4.561      -1.253       0.217          Not Significant
      Tune up games                                     7.296       1.976        0.054          Not Significant
      Competition                                       -5.873      -3.421       0.001          Significant
  Sports Events
      Training                                          0.482       0.235        0.815          Not Significant
      Coaching                                          -5.167      -1.680       0.099          Significant
      Tune up games                                     5.531       1.774        0.083          Not Significant
      Competition                                       -4.155      -2.866       0.006          Significant
Adjusted R-Square: 0.7284
 F-value:                   33.854
Sig.:                       0.0000

          Table 9 shows the significant effect of the demographic profile of the student-athlete to the sports activity.
Results from Table 9 revealed that the Sports Activity had no effect on demographic profile of the student-athlete.
The beta coefficient indicates that for every standard deviation unit increase in Training, Coaching, tune up games
and Competition, there is a corresponding unit increase in the demographic profile of the student-athlete. The t-value
of Training, Coaching, tune up games and Competition is not significant having a p-value of greater than 0.05 level
of significance.

                          2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016   | www.eprajournals.com |262   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016            ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
       EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
    Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                            - Peer Reviewed Journal

This means that the demographic profile of the student-athlete to the sports activity was not influenced by age,
gender, sex and sports events.Based on the data, it is shown that there is “no significant effect of the demographic
profile of the student-athlete to the sports activity” at 0.05 level of significance. It shows that the null hypothesis
stating that “There is no significant effect of the demographic profile of the student-athlete to the sports activity” is
accepted, it can inferred that there is “no significant” effect between them.

                  Table 10. Significant effect of the behavior of the student in the sports activity
Physical                                                Beta         t-value       p-value          Analysis
   Training                                             0.133        0.189         0.851            Not Significant

    Coaching                                             2.522         2.386            0.021              Significant
    Tune up games                                        -1.773        -1.654           0.105              Not Significant

    Competition                                          0.081         0.162            0.872              Not Significant

Emotional
  Training                                               0.171         0.976            0.334              Not Significant

    Coaching                                             1.704         6.474            0.000              Significant
    Tune up games                                        -0.728        -2.727           0.009              Significant
    Competition                                          -0.159        -1.288           0.204              Not Significant

Social
   Training                                              -0.007        -0.007           0.995              Not Significant

    Coaching                                             2.627         1.775            0.083              Not Significant

    Tune up games                                        -1.780        -1.186           0.242              Not Significant

    Competition                                          -0.039        -0.056           0.956              Not Significant

Psychological
   Training                                              0.427         6.273            0.000              Significant
    Coaching                                             -1.280        -12.53           0.000              Significant
    Tune up games                                        1.703         16.448           0.000              Significant
    Competition                                          0.153         3.176            0.003              Significant

          Table 10 shows the significant effect of the behavior of the student in the sports activity. Results from
Table 10 revealed that the Sports Activity had no effect on behavior of the student-athlete. The beta coefficient
indicates that for every standard deviation unit increase in Training, Coaching, Tune up games and Competition,
there is a corresponding unit increase in the behavior of the student-athlete. The t-value of Training, Coaching, Tune
up games and Competition is not significant having a p-value of greater than 0.05 level of significance.
          This means that the behavior of the student-athlete to the sports activity was not influenced by physical
activity, emotional activity, social behavior and psychological aspect

                          2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016       | www.eprajournals.com |263   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016               ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
           EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
      Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                                 - Peer Reviewed Journal

V.          CONCLUSION
      Drawn the results of the study, the following results are set forth;
      1. The null hypothesis stating that is no significant effect of the demographic profile of the student-athlete to
         the sports activity, is accepted, it can inferred that there is “no significant” effect between them.
      2. The null hypothesis stating that the here is no significant effect of the behavior of the student-athlete to the
         sports activity” is accepted, it can inferred that there is “no significant” effect between them.

RECOMMENDATION
            In the light of the findings and conclusion of the study, the following recommendations were drawn.
      1.    The student-athletes may advice to continue to enhance their ability to improved their performance to their
            respective chosen sports.
      2.    The Teacher-Coach may also maintain and improve their knowledge and abilities to continue to encourage
            the student-athletes to visualize the great opportunities in the near future the their respective sports.
      3.    The school administrator may implement the continuous communication and support to the student-athletes
            for them to be motivated and feel that they were being assisted even in the time of pandemic.
      4.    To the future researchers, a parallel study could be done in order to negate, confirm or improve the result of
            the present study.

REFERENCES
      1.    Ali, H.Y.; Danish, R.Q.; Asrar-ul-Haq, M. How corporate social responsibility boosts firm financial performance: The
            mediating role of corporate image and customer satisfaction. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 166–
            177.
      2.    Alvarez-Garcia, D.; Carlos Nunez, J.; Garcia, T.; Barreiro-Collazo, A. Individual, Family, and Community Predictors
            of Cyber-Aggression among Adolescents. Eur. J. Psychol. Appl. Leg. Context 2018, 10, 79–88.
      3.    Aquilina D. A study of the relationship between elite athletes’ educational development and sporting performance. Int J
            Hist Sport. 2013; 30:374–92.
      4.    Astuti, Tri M. P., et al. "The Socialization Model of National Character Education for Students in Elementary School
            Through Comic." Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, vol. 6, no. 2, Sep. 2014, pp.
            260-270, doi:10.15294/komunitas.v6i2.3305.
      5.    Aylie, N. S., Mekonen, M. A., & Mekuria, R. M. (2020).The Psychological Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic Among
            University Students in Bench-Sheko Zone, South-west Ethiopia: A Community-based Cross-sectional Study Psychology
            Research and Behavior Management, Volume 13, 813–821. doi:10.2147/prbm.s275593
      6.    Babore, A.; Trumello, C.; Candelori, C.; Paciello, M.; Cerniglia, L. Depressive Symptoms, Self-Esteem and Perceived
            Parent-Child Relationship in Early Adolescence. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 982.
      7.    Bachmann C, Oesch P and Bachmann S (2018) Recommendations for improving adherence to home-based exercise: A
            systematic review. Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 28(1): 20–31
      8.    Barbisch, D., Koenig, K. L., & Shih, F. Y. (2015). Is there a case for quarantine? Perspectives from SARS to Ebola.
            Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 9(5), 547–553. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/dmp.2015.38
      9.    Besi, M.; Sakellariou, M. Teachers’ Views on the Participation of Parents in the Transition of their Children from
            Kindergarten to Primary School. Behav. Sci. 2019, 9, 124
      10.   Bento, G., & Dias, G. (2017). The importance of outdoor play for young children’s healthy development. Porto
            Biomedical Journal, 2(5), 157–160. doi:10.1016/j.pbj.2017.03.003
      11.   Breines, J. G., & Chen, S. (2012). Self-compassion increases self-improvement motivation. Personality and Social
            Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1133–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212445599
      12.   Catane, J. (2000). Conducting Research: A Practical Application. JMC Press Inc., 388 Quezon Avenue, Quezon City
      13.   Castro-Sánchez, M.; Zurita-Ortega, F.; Chacón-Cuberos, R.; López-Gutiérrez, C.J.; Zafra-Santos, E. Emotional
            intelligence, motivational climate and levels of anxiety in athletes from different categories of sports: Analysis through
            structural equations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 894.
      14.   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, March 12, 2020. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-
            nCoV/summary.html#anchor_1580079137454
      15.   Cerniglia, L., Zoratto, F., Cimino, S., Laviola, G., Ammaniti, M., & Adriani, W. (2017). Internet Addiction in
            adolescence: Neurobiological, psychosocial and clinical issues. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 76, 174–184.
            https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neubiorev.2016.12.024.

                              2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016         | www.eprajournals.com |264   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016             ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
    EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
 Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                               - Peer Reviewed Journal

 16. CDC. COVID-19: options to reduce quarantine for contacts of persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection using symptom
     monitoring and diagnostic testing. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC;
     2020.. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/more/scientific-brief-options-to-reduce-quarantine.html
 17. C. Gramaglia, A. Jona, F. Imperatori, E. Torre, P. Zeppegno, Cinema in the training of psychiatry residents: focus on
     helping relationships, BMC Med. Educ. 13 (1) (2013) 90.
 18. Clemente-Suárez, V. J., Hormeño-Holgado, A., Jiménez, M., Benitez-Agudelo,J. C., Navarro-Jiménez,
     E.,PerezPalencia, N., et al. (2020). Dynamics ofpopulation immunity due to the herd effect in the COVID-19
     pandemic.Vaccines 8:236. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8020236
 19. Clemente-Suárez VJ, Fuentes-García JP, de la Vega Marcos R and Martínez Patiño MJ (2020) Modulators of the
     Personal and Professional Threat Perception of Olympic Athletes in the Actual COVID-19 Crisis. Front. Psychol.
     11:1985.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01985
 20. China      Daily.      (2020a).     Government        works     to     increase     access     to    medical     supplies.
     https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202002/10/WS5e409e95a310128217276212.h
 21. China Daily. (2020b). Latest on the novel coronavirus outbreak. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/
     202002/09/WS5e2a95d9a310128217273202.htm
 22. Chınurum, J., OgunjImi, L. O., & O’Neill, C. B. (2014). Gender and Sports in Contemporary Society. Journal of
     Educational              and           Social            Research, 4(7),            25.           Retrieved           from
     http://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/jesr/article/view/5293
 23. Commonwealth of Australia. National sport and active recreation policy framework. In. Canberra: Commonwealth of
     Australia; 2011.
 24. Costa e Silva, L., Fragoso, M. I., & Teles, J. (2017). Physical Activity–Related Injury Profile in Children and
     Adolescents According to Their Age, Maturation, and Level of Sports Participation. Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary
     Approach, 9(2), 118–125. doi:10.1177/1941738116686964
 25. Cornwell, B., & Laumann, E. O. (2015). The health benefits of network growth: New evidence from a national survey
     of older adults. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 125, 94–106. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.011
 26. COVID-19 Working Group. (2020). Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts.
     The Lancet Global Health, 8(4), e488–e496. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30074-7
 27. Crova, C., Struzzolino, I., Marchetti, R., Masci, I., Vannozzi, G., Forte, R., & Pesce, C. (2014). Cognitively challenging
     physical activity benefits executive function in overweight children. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32, 201–211.
 28. David Cenon, Patrick . Clamor, Wilfred Luis L,. Simpao Anne Claire S (2020). Time Allocation Before and During
     Enhanced Community Quarantine Among Students In A University In Manila, Philippines,
     https://pjhrd.upm.edu.ph/index.php/main/issue/view/27.
 29. Delorme, N., Chalabaev, A., & Raspaud, M. (2011). Relative age is associated with sport dropout: evidence from youth
     categories of French basketball. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 21(1), 120–
     128. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01060.x
 30. Donnelly, J. E., & Lambourne, K. (2011). Classroom-based physical activity, cognition, and academic achievement.
     Preventive Medicine, 52, S36–S42. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.021
 31. De Mooij, M. Consumer Behavior and Culture: Consequences for Global Marketing and Advertising; SAGE
     Publications Limited: London, UK, 2019.
 32. Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2015). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across
     childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. Advance online publication.
     doi:10.1007/s10648- 015-9320-8
 33. Eime, R. M., Harvey, J. T., Charity, M. J., Casey, M. M., Westerbeek, H., & Payne, W. R. (2016). Age profiles of sport
     participants. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 8(1). doi:10.1186/s13102-016-0031-3
 34. Eime R, Sawyer N, Harvey J, Casey M, Westerbeek H, Payne W. Integrating public health and sport management:
     sport participation trends 2001–2010. Sport Manage Rev. 2015;18(2):207–17.
 35. Eime R, Harvey J, Payne W. Dose–response of women’s Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and life satisfaction
     to physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11:330–8.
 36. Engebretsen L, Steffen K, Bahr R, Broderick C, Dvorak J, Janarv PM, Johnson A, Leglise M, Mamisch TC, McKay D,
     Micheli L, Schamasch P, Singh GD, Stafford DEJ, Steen H (2011) The International Olympic Committee consensus
     statement on age determination in high-level young athletes. Br J Sports Med 44:476–484
 37. Ferguson, L. J., Kowalski, K. C., Mack, D. E., & Sabiston, C. M. (2015). Self-compassion and eudaimonic well-being
     during      emotionally      difficult    times      in    sport. Journal      of    Happiness      Studies, 16,     1263–
     1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9558-8
 38. Foskett, R. L., and Longstaff, F. (2018). The mental health of elite athletes in theUnited Kingdom. J. Sci. Med. Sport 21,
     765–770. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.11.016

                        2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016        | www.eprajournals.com |265   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016            ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
    EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
 Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                              - Peer Reviewed Journal

 39. Fong, C. J., Davis, C. W., Kim, Y., Kim, Y. W., Marriott, L., & Kim, S. (2016). Psychosocial Factors and Community
     College Student Success. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 388–424. doi:10.3102/0034654316653479
 40. Fong, C. J., Krause, J. M., Acee, T. A., & Weinstein, C. E. (2015). The role of extrinsic motivation for Latino
     community college students: Differences between LEP (limited English proficient) and non-LEP students. Journal of
     Hispanic Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1538192715607332
 41. Gabbett, T.J.; Whyte, D.G.; Hartwig, T.B.; Wescombe, H.; Naughton, G.A. The relationship between workloads,
     physical performance, injury and illness in adolescent male football players. Sports Med. 2014, 44, 989–1003.
 42. Gao, Z., Hannon, J. C., Newton, M., & Huang, C. (2011). Effects of Curricular Activity on Students’ Situational
     Motivation and Physical Activity Levels. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3), 536–
     544. doi:10.1080/02701367.2011.1059978
 43. Ghazvini, S. D., & Khajehpour, M. (2011). Gender differences in factors affecting academic performance of high
     school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1040–1045. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.236
 44. Giuliano, T.A.., Turner, K.L., Lundquist, J.C., and Knight, J.L. (2011).Gender and the Selection of Public Athletic Role
     Models. Journal of Sport Behavior, 30 (2), 161-199.
 45. Giuliano, T.A.., Turner, K.L., Lundquist, J.C., and Knight, J.L. (2011).Gender and the Selection of Public Athletic Role
     Models. Journal of Sport Behavior, 30 (2), 161-199.
 46. Green, C. S., Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2014). On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments.
     Psychological Research, 78(6), 756–772. doi:10.1007/s00426-013-0535- 3.
 47. Gullu, S.; Yildiz, K. An Analysis on the Relationship among Trust in Manager, Political Behavior and Organizational
     Commitment: The Case of a Sports Organization. J. Educ. Train. Stud. 2019, 7, 116–127.
 48. Haff, G. G., & Nimphius, S. (2012). Training Principles for Power. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 34(6), 2–
     12. doi:10.1519/ssc.0b013e31826db467
 49. Heath, G. W., Parra, D. C., Sarmiento, O. L., Andersen, L. B., Owen, N., Goenka, S., … Brownson, R. C.
     (2012). Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. The Lancet, 380(9838), 272–
     281. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60816-2
 50. Hellewell, J., Abbott, S., Gimma, A., Bosse, N. I., Jarvis, C. I., Russell, T. W., Munday, J. D., Kucharski, A. J.,
     Edmunds, W. J., Funk, S., & Eggo, R. M, Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases
 51. Honein MA, Christie A, Rose DA, Brooks JT, Meaney-Delman D, Cohn A, Sauber-Schatz EK, Walker A, McDonald
     LC, Liburd LC, Hall JE, Fry AM, Hall AJ, Gupta N, Kuhnert WL, Yoon PW, Gundlapalli AV, Beach MJ, Walke HT,
     CDC COVID-19 Response Team.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Dec 11; 69(49):1860-1867.
 52. Ishihara, T., Sugasawa, S., Matsuda, Y., & Mizuno, M. (2017). Relationship between sports experience and executive
     function in 6-12-year-old children: independence from physical fitness and moderation by gender. Developmental
     Science, 21(3), e12555. doi:10.1111/desc.12555
 53. Inoue, Y.; Funk, D.C.; McDonald, H. Predicting behavioral loyalty through corporate social responsibility: The
     mediating role of involvement and commitment. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 75, 46–56.
 54. Infratest dimap (2020) ARD DeutschlandTREND April 2020. Available at: www.infratest-dimap. de/umfragen-
     analysen/bundesweit/ard-deutschlandtrend/
 55. Jayanthi NA, LaBella CR, Fischer D, Pasulka J, Dugas LR. Sports-specialized intensive training and the risk of injury
     in young athletes: a clinical case-control study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:794-801.
 56. Jopp E, Schröder I, Maas R, Adam G, Püschel K (2011) Proximale Tibiaepiphyse im Magnetresonanztomogramm.
     Rechtsmed 20:464–468
 57. Jones, V. F., & Jones, L. S. (2012). Comprehensive classroom management, creating communities of support and
     solving problems (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
 58. Jowett, S., & Shanmugam, V. (2016). Relational Coaching in Sport: Its psychological underpinnings and practical
     effectiveness. In R. Schinke, K.R. McGannon, & B. Smith (Eds), Routledge International Handbook of Sport
     Psychology (pp. 471-484). Routledge
 59. Juszkiewicz, J. (2015). Trends in community college enrollment and completion data, 2015. Washington, DC:
     American Association of Community Colleges.
 60. Kadivar, M., Mafinejad, M. K., Bazzaz, J. T., Mirzazadeh, A., & Jannat, Z. (2018). Cinemedicine: Using movies to
     improve students’ understanding of psychosocial aspects of medicine. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 28, 23–
     27. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2018.02.005
 61. Kanematsu Y, Matsuura T, Kashiwaguchi S, Iwase T, Suzue N, Iwame T, Fukuta S, Hamada D, Goto T, Sairyo K
     (2015) Epidemiology of shoulder injuries in young baseball players and grading of radiologic findings of Little
     Leaguer’s shoulder. J Med Invest, doi: 10.2152/jmi.62.123
 62. Kandola, A., Lewis, G., Osborn, D. P. J., Stubbs, B., & Hayes, J. F. (2020). Depressive symptoms and objectively
     measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour throughout adolescence: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet
     Psychiatry, 7(3), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S2215-0366(20)30034-1

                       2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016        | www.eprajournals.com |266   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016             ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
    EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
 Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                               - Peer Reviewed Journal

 63. Keeler, L.A. (2012). Differences in Sport Aggression, Life Aggression, and Life Assertion Among Adult Male and
     Female Collision, Contact, and Non- Contact Sport Athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 30 (1), 57-77.
 64. Killham, M. E., Mosewich, A. D., Mack, D. E., Gunnell,K. E., & Ferguson, L. J. (2018). Women athletes’ self-
     compassion, self-criticism, and perceived sport performance. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7(3), 297-
     307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spy0000127
 63. Klein, K.; Völckner, F.; Bruno, H.A.; Sattler, H.; Bruno, P. Brand Positioning Based on Brand Image–Country Image
     Fit. Mark. Sci. 2019, 38, 516–538.
 64. Klostermann C and Nagel S (2012) Changes in German sport participation: Historical trends in individual sports.
     International Review for the Sociology of Sport 49(5): 609–634.
 65. Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of
     Classroom Management Strategies and Classroom Management Programs on Students’ Academic, Behavioral,
     Emotional,      and      Motivational     Outcomes.      Review      of    Educational      Research,     86(3),    643–
     680. doi:10.3102/0034654315626799
 66. Kwon S, Janz KF, Letuchy EM, Burns TL, Levy SM. Active lifestyle in childhood and adolescence prevents obesity
     development in young adulthood. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015;23:2462-9.
 67. Laborde, S.; Guillén, F.; Mosley, E. Positive personality-trait-like individual differences in athletes from individual-
     and team sports and in non-athletes. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2016, 26, 9–13.
 68. Lane, A.M., Beedie, C.J., Jones, M.V., Uphill, M., & Devonport, T.J. (2012). The BASES expert statement on emotion
     regulation in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30, 1189-1195. PubMed doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.693621
 69. Larkin, P., Mesagno, C., Spittle, M., & Berry, J. (2015). International Journal of Sport Psychology, 46, 555–586.
 70. Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2012). Interrelations of Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive School Engagement in High
     School Students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(1), 20–32. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9857-5
 71. Lupo C, Tessitore A, Capranica L, Rauter S, Doupona Topic M. Motivation for a dual-career: Italian and Slovenian
     student-athletes. Kin Si. 2012; 18:47–56.
 72. Lupo, C., Mosso, C. O., Guidotti, F., Cugliari, G., Pizzigalli, L., & Rainoldi, A. (2017). The Adapted Italian Version of
     the Baller Identity Measurement Scale to Evaluate the Student-Athletes’ Identity in Relation to Gender, Age, Type of
     Sport, and Competition Level. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0169278. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169278
 73. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise physiology : energy, nutrition, and human performance. 8th ed.
     Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
 74. MacFarlane, K., & Woolfson, L. M. (2013). Teacher attitudes and behavior toward the inclusion of children with
     social, emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream schools: An application of the theory of planned behavior.
     Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 46–52. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.006
 75. McGuigan, M. R., Wright, G. A., & Fleck, S. J. (2012). Strength Training for Athletes: Does It Really Help Sports
     Performance? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 7(1), 2–5. doi:10.1123/ijspp.7.1.2
 76. Martinez-Escudero, J. A., Villarejo, S., Garcia, O. F., & Garcia, F. (2020). Parental Socialization and Its Impact
     across the Lifespan. Behavioral Sciences, 10(6), 101. doi:10.3390/bs10060101
 77. Martínez Cevallos, D., Alguacil, M., & Calabuig Moreno, F. (2020). Influence of Brand Image of a Sports Event on the
     Recommendation of Its Participants. Sustainability, 12(12), 5040. doi:10.3390/su12125040
 78. Martland R, Mondelli V, Gaughran F, et al. (2020) Can high-intensity interval training improve physical and mental
     health outcomes? A meta-review of 33 systematic reviews across the lifespan. Journal of Sports Sciences 38(4): 430–
     469.
 79. Maugeri, G.; Castrogiovanni, P.; Battaglia, G.; Pippi, R.; D’agata, V.; Palma, A.; Di Rosa, M.; Musumeci, G. The
     impact of physical activity on psychological health during Covid-19 pandemic in Italy. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04315
 80. Morgan, S., & McPherson, S. L. (2013). Developing tactics. In D. Farrow, J. Baker & C. MacMahon (Eds.),
     Developing sport expertise (pp. 231–244). London andNewYork: Routledge
 81. Mosewich, A. D., Crocker, P. R. E., & Kowalski, K. C. (2014). Managing injury and other setbacks in sport:
     Experiences of (and resources for) high-performance women athletes. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and
     Health, 6, 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2013.766810
 82. Mujika, I.; Padilla, S. Detraining: Loss of training-induced physiological and performance adaptations. Part II. Sports
     Med. 2000, 30, 145–154.
 83. Mutz, M., & Gerke, M. (2020). Sport and exercise in times of self-quarantine: How Germans changed their behaviour
     at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic. International Review for the Sociology of Sport,
     101269022093433. doi:10.1177/1012690220934335
 84. Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition–performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the
     opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1035–
     1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028324

                        2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016        | www.eprajournals.com |267   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016            ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
    EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
 Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                              - Peer Reviewed Journal

 85. NCCN. Survivorship version 2.2014. In: National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in
      Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) 2014.
 86. Niu C, Eng L, Qiu X, et al. Lifestyle behaviors in elderly cancer survivors: a comparison with middle-age cancer
      survivors. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(4):e450–9.
 87. O’Connor, D. B., Aggleton, J. P., Chakrabarti, B., Cooper, C. L., Creswell, C., Dunsmuir, S., et al. (2020). Research
      priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a call to action for psychological science. Br. J. Psychol. e12468
 88. Oshimi, D.; Harada, M. Host residents’ role in sporting events: The city image perspective. Sport Manag. Rev. 2019,
      22, 263–275.
 89. Palacios-Ceña D, Fernandez-de-Las-Peñas C, Hernández-Barrera V, JiménezGarcia R, Alonso-Blanco C, Carrasco-
      Garrido P. Sports participation increased in Spain: a population-based time trend study of 21 381 adults in the years
      2000, 2005 and 2010. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(16):1137–9.
 90. Parra-Camacho, D.; Aguado-Berenguer, S.; Núñez-Pomar, J.M. Costs of holding a sporting event: The host
      community perception. J. Sports Econ. Manag. 2015, 5, 17–36
 91. Paul, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., & Nassis, G. P. (2015). Agility in Team Sports: Testing, Training and Factors Affecting
      Performance. Sports Medicine, 46(3), 421–442. doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0428-2
 92. Pesce, C. (2012). Shifting the focus from quantitative to qualitative exercise characteristics in exercise and cognition
      research. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 766–786.
 93. Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Students’ emotional and cognitive engagement as the determinants of
      well-being and achievement in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 67, 40–
      51. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2014.05.001
 94. Pillay, L.; van Rensburg, D.C.C.J.; van Rensburg, A.J.; Ramagole, D.A.; Holtzhausen, L.; Dijkstra, H.P.; Cronje, T.
      Nowhere to hide: The significant impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) measures on elite and semi-elite
      South African athletes. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2020.
 95. Prasetyo, Y. T., Castillo, A. M., Salonga, L. J., Sia, J. A., & Seneta, J. A. (2020). Factors Affecting Perceived
      Effectiveness of COVID-19 Prevention Measures among Filipino during Enhanced Community Quarantine in Luzon,
      Philippines: Integrating Protection Motivation Theory and Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. International
      Journal of Infectious Diseases. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.074
 96. Reardon, C.L.; Hainline, B.; Aron, C.M.; Baron, D.; Baum, A.L.; Bindra, A.; Budgett, R.; Campriani, N.; Castaldelli-
      Maia, J.M.; Currie, A. Mental health in elite athletes: International Olympic Committee consensus statement (2019).
      Br. J. Sports Med. 2019, 53, 667–699. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 97. Rice, J.A.; Hambrick, M.E.; Greenwell, T.C. Mass participant sport event brand associations: An analysis of two event
      categories. Int. J. Sport Manag. Mark. 2019, 19, 330–351
 98. Rogers, L. Q., Carter, S. J., Williams, G., & Courneya, K. S. (2018). Physical Activity. Handbook of Cancer
      Survivorship, 287–307. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77432-9_15
 99. Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Pianta, R. C. (2016). How teacher emotional
      support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence.
      Learning and Instruction, 42, 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004
 100. Santiago , Jomell M. , Cajucom Rita L. (2020) International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) Vol. 9, No. 4,
      December 2020, Knowledge about COVID-19 among university students before the implementation of the enhanced
      community quarantine in Philippines. pp.321~328 ISSN: 2252-8806, DOI: 10.11591/ijphs.v9i4.20545
 101. Schmalz, D. L., and Davison, K. K. (2012).Differences in Physical Self-concept Among Pre-Adolescents Who
      Participate in GenderTyped and Cross-Gendered Sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 29 (4), 335-35
 103. Schneider S, Yamamoto S, Weidmann C, Brühmann B. Sports injuries among adolescents: Incidence, causes and
      consequences. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48:183-189.
 104. Sevilla, Consuelo G. et. al (2007). Research Methods. Rex Printing Company. Quezon City'
 105. Sluis A, van der Elferink-Gemser MT, Coelho-e-Silva MJ, Nijboer JA, Brink MS, Visscher C. Sport injuries aligned to
      peak height velocity in talented pubertal soccer players. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35:351-355.
 106. Sopa, I.S. & Pomohaci, M. (2016). Tehnics of communication and social integration through sport. Lambert Academic
      Publishing. ISBN-13: 978-3-659-86350-9.
 107. Sopa, I.S. & Pomohaci M. (2015 a). Socialization through Sport, Effects of Team Sport on Students at Primary Level.
      Bologna: Medimond Publishing Company. ISBN: 978-88- 7587-718-7, p. 351.
 108. Sopa, I.S. & Pomohaci, M. (2015 b). Methodical discipline of Volleyball. Lambert Academic Publishing. ISBN-13:
      978-3-659-78757-7.
 109. Standage, M., Gillison, F. B., Ntoumanis, N., & Treasure, D. C. (2012). Predicting Students’ Physical Activity and
      Health-Related Well-Being: A Prospective Cross-Domain Investigation of Motivation across School Physical
      Education and Exercise Settings. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(1), 37–60. doi:10.1123/jsep.34.1.37

                       2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016        | www.eprajournals.com |268   |
SJIF Impact Factor 2021: 8.013| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016           ISSN: 2455-7838(Online)
    EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD)
 Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | July 2021                                             - Peer Reviewed Journal

 110. Standage, M., & Ryan, R.M. (2012). Self-determination theory and exercise motivation: Facilitating self-regulatory
      processes to support and maintain healthy and well-being. In G.C. Roberts & D.C. Treasure (Eds.), Advances in
      motivation in sport and exercise (3rd ed., pp. 233–270). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
 111. Stracciolini A, Casciano R, Levey Friedman H, Meehan WP, Micheli LJ. Pediatric sports injuries: an age comparison
      of children versus adolescents. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1922-1929.
 112. Strewe, C., Muckenthaler, F., Feuerecker, M., Yi, B., Rykova, M., Kaufmann, I.,et al. (2015). Functional changes in
      neutrophils and psychoneuroendocrineresponses during 105 days of confinement. J. Appl. Physiol. 118, 1122–1127.
      doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00755.2014
 113. Studsrød, I., & Bru, E. (2011). Perceptions of peers as socialization agents and adjustment in upper secondary school.
      Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 16(2), 159–172. doi:10.1080/13632752.2011.569401
 114. Sutherland, L. M., Kowalski, K. C., Ferguson, L. J., Sabiston, C. M., Sedgwick, W. A., & Crocker, P. R. E. (2014).
      Narratives of young women athletes’ experiences of emotional pain and self-compassion. Qualitative Research in
      Sport, Exercise and Health, 6, 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2014.888587
 115. Syväoja, H.J., Tammelin, T.H., Ahonen, T., Kankaanpää, A., & Kantomaa, M.T. (2014). The associations of objectively
      measured physical activity and sedentary time with cognitive functions in school-aged children. PLoS ONE, 9,
      e103559.
 116. Tang, F., Liang, J., Zhang, H., Kelifa, M. M., He, Q., & Wang, P. (2020). COVID-19 related depression and anxiety
      among quarantined respondents. Psychology & Health, 1–15. doi:10.1080/08870446.2020.1782410
 117. Timme, M., Steinacker, J. M., & Schmeling, A. (2016). Age estimation in competitive sports. International Journal of
      Legal Medicine, 131(1), 225–233. doi:10.1007/s00414-016-1456-7
 118. Van de Grift, W., Van der Wal, M., & Torenbeek, M. (2011). Ontwikkeling in de pedagogisch didactische vaardigheid
      van leraren in het basisonderwijs [Development in the pedagogical and didactic skills of primary school teachers].
      Pedagogische Studiën, 88, 416–432.
 119. Van Tuyckom C, Scheerder J, Bracke P. Gender and age inequalities in regular sports participation: a cross-national
      study of 25 European countries. J Sports Sci. 2011;28(10):1077–84
 120. Vale, L.; Fernandes, T. Social media and sports: Driving fan engagement with football clubs on Facebook. J. Strateg.
      Mark. 2018, 26, 37–55
 121. Varley MC, Gabbett T, Aughey RJ. Activity profiles of professional soccer, rugby league and Australian football match
      play. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(20):1858–66.
 122. Vaughan RS, Edwards EJ and MacIntyre TE (2020) Mental Health Measurement in a Post Covid-19 World:
      Psychometric Properties and Invariance of the DASS-21 in Athletes and Non-athletes. Front. Psychol. 11:590559. doi:
      10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590559
 123. Wachsmuth, S., Jowett, S., & Harwood, C. (2017). Conflict among athletes and their coaches: what is the theory and
      research so far? International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10 (1), 84-107.
 124. Wagstaff, C. R. D. (2014). Emotion Regulation and Sport Performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,
      36(4), 401–412. doi:10.1123/jsep.2013-0257
 125. Wang, C.; Pan, R.; Wan, X.; Tan, Y.; Xu, L.; Ho, C.S.; Ho, R.C. Immediate psychological responses and associated
      factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in
      China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1729
 126. Wang, C. W., Ho, R. T., Chan, C. L., & Tse, S. (2015). Exploring personality characteristics of Chinese adolescents
      with internet-related addictive behaviors: Trait differences for gaming addiction and social networking addiction.
      Addictive Behaviors, 42, 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.039
 127. Wang, M., & Eccles, J. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal
      study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23.
 128. Wang, R., Chen, Z., Zhou, Y., Shen, L., Zhang, Z., & Wu, X. (2019). Melancholy or mahjong? Diversity, frequency,
      type, and rural-urban divide of social participation and depression in middle- and old-aged Chinese: A fixed-effects
      analysis. Social Science & Medicine (1982)), 238, 112518https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112518
 129. Warburton, D. E. R., & Bredin, S. S. D. (2016). Reflections on Physical Activity and Health: What Should We
      Recommend? Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 32(4), 495–504. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.024
 130. Wartberg, L., Kriston, L., & Thomasius, R. (2019). Internet gaming disorder and problematic social media use in a
      representative sample of German adolescents: prevalence estimates, comorbid depressive symptoms and related
      psychosocial aspects. Computers in Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.014
 131. Wartberg, L., Kriston, L., Bröning, S., Kegel, K., & Thomasius, R. (2017). Adolescent problematic Internet use: Is a
      parental rating suitable to estimate prevalence and identify familial correlates? Computers in Human Behavior, 67,
      233–239. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.029.
 132. Wentzel, K. R. (2015). Socialization in school settings. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of
      socialization: Theory and research (p. 251–275). The Guilford Press.

                       2021 EPRA IJRD | Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016       | www.eprajournals.com |269   |
You can also read