APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 - NEW ZEALAND - New paths ahead for international tax Controversy - DLA Piper
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
NEW ZEALAND APA PROGRAM KEY FEATURES Competent Inland Revenue Department (‘IRD’) authority Relevant Part 5A of the Tax Administration Act; and general guidance provisions available on the IRD’s website. Types of APAs Unilateral, bilateral, and multilateral APAs are available under the available private binding rulings regime. Acceptance No specific guidance. criteria Key timing No specific guidance. requests, deadlines APA term limits There is no specific guidance for APA term limits. In practice there is usually a maximum term of five years. Filing fee A flat fee of NZD 322 (approx. USD 226) is payable to the IRD. Any overseas travel is required for the completion of an APA, and the IRD will seek to recover out of pocket expenses on an actual and reasonable basis from the Taxpayer. An estimate of such costs will be provided to the Taxpayer prior to the travel being undertaken. Rollback No specific guidance. availability Collateral issues Applications from Taxpayers under investigation by the IRD for tax issues will be refused. PRE-FILING REQUIREMENTS Overview Taxpayers intending to apply for an APA should contact for a pre- application meeting with a Principal Advisor (Transfer Pricing) to discuss the proposal informally. During the meeting the following will be discussed and presented for consideration: ■■ an overview of the business operations; ■■ background information on the foreign entities involved in the transactions intended to be covered by the APA; and ■■ TP method intended to be applied. Anonymous pre- Anonymous pre-filing is not available. filing availability 02 | APA & MAP Country Guide 2018 – New Zealand
NEW ZEALAND (cont’d) APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Content of After a successful pre-filing meeting the APA application will application be formalised and submitted for consideration. This application should include: ■■ identification of the test party; ■■ analysis of key profit drivers and value added; ■■ a full functional analysis; ■■ the choice of TP method; ■■ a study of comparables; ■■ proposed application of methodology and comparables; and ■■ copies of all inter-company agreements. Site visits and interviews may be required during the application review stage to inspect the actual operations of the relevant associated parties, especially where valuable intangibles are in issue and a residual profit split methodology is proposed. Language The documentation should be submitted in English. SME provisions No specific guidance. OTHER PROCEDURAL CONSIDERATIONS General The IRD follows a standard pre-filing, application and monitoring process. There are no unique procedural aspects. Monitoring & Taxpayers are required to provide an Annual Compliance Report compliance at the time of filing their annual returns and indicate whether or not they have adhered to the terms of the APA. Renewal Taxpayers may request to renew an existing APA following the procedure same process as it did to initiate the existing APA. www.dlapiper.com | 03
NEW ZEALAND (cont’d) MAP PROGRAM KEY FEATURES Competent Inland Revenue Department (‘IRD’) authority Relevant There are no specific provisions for the MAP procedure in provisions domestic law. Taxpayers must rely on the MAP provisions under DTTs, and informal guidance published on the IRD website. Acceptance Taxpayers may request a MAP if taxation has or is likely to occur criteria that is not in accordance with the provisions of a DTT to which New Zealand is signatory. Key timing Most of New Zealand’s DTTs permit Taxpayers to present a case requests, to the IRD within three years from the first notification to the deadlines Taxpayer of the actions giving rise to taxation not in accordance with the DTT. However, time limits may vary, and the relevant DTT should be consulted for the applicable time limit. 04 | APA & MAP Country Guide 2018 – New Zealand
NEW ZEALAND (cont’d) APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Content of Taxpayers can facilitate the MAP by ensuring the tax authorities application of both contracting states receive complete, accurate and timely information. Depending on what may be determined as a result of a pre-filing conference, the following information should be included in a taxpayer’s MAP submission: ■■ name, address and IRD number of the Taxpayer; ■■ the provision of the specific article of the DTT which the taxpayer considers is not being applied correctly by either one or both contracting states; ■■ the relevant facts of the case including any documentation substantiating these facts, the period involved and the amounts involved; ■■ an analysis of the issues involved supported by relevant documentation; ■■ where a request has also been made to the tax authority of the other contracting state, a copy of that submission; ■■ if the issue has been previously dealt with by some other means (such as an advance ruling, APA or settlement agreement), then a copy of any relevant ruling or agreement; ■■ if the MAP request has been submitted to another tax authority under another instrument that provides for a mechanism to resolve treaty-related disputes, then a copy of that submission (including all related documentation) unless the content of both MAP submissions are exactly the same; ■■ if the MAP request is “protective” (ie submitted to ensure compliance with a time frame provided under the relevant DTT but not to be examined until further notification from the taxpayer to do so), then a clear statement to this effect; and ■■ a final statement confirming that all information provided in the MAP request is accurate and additional information will be provided in a timely manner if required by the tax authority. www.dlapiper.com | 05
NEW ZEALAND (cont’d) OTHER PROCEDURAL CONSIDERATIONS Interaction Taxpayers can initiate the MAP and the domestic disputes process with domestic simultaneously. Access to MAP is not limited with respect to proceedings matters resolved through the Disputes Review Unit. Requesting assistance to resolve a dispute under the MAP does not preclude any domestic action. A request for assistance under the MAP can be made even if an audit settlement has been agreed domestically. Furthermore, the IRD is legally bound to follow a domestic court decision in MAP cases, but is willing to enter into dialogue with other relevant foreign jurisdiction’s competent authorities to explain the New Zealand position in any case where double taxation may have arisen as a consequence. Arbitration No specific guidance. STATISTICS APA As at 30 June 2017, 170 APAs had been completed by the IRD. MAP New Zealand had a total of 15 active MAP applications as of 31 December 2016. The average time needed to close MAP cases is 22 months for transfer pricing cases, and 19 months for other cases. 06 | APA & MAP Country Guide 2018 – New Zealand
NEW ZEALAND (cont’d) DOUBLE TAXATION TREATY NETWORK The following treaties include MAP provisions which are the basis for bilateral and multilateral APA negotiations: Australia(I) India Samoa(IV) Austria Indonesia Singapore Belgium Ireland South Africa British Virgin Islands (IV) Italy Spain Canada(IV) Japan(I), (IV), (VI) Sweden Chile Korea (Republic of) Switzerland China Malaysia Taipei(III) Czech Republic Mexico Thailand Denmark Netherlands Turkey Fiji Norway United Arab Emirates Finland Papua New Guinea (IV) United Kingdom France Philippines United States Germany Poland Vietnam(IV) Hong Kong Russia NOTES I denotes treaties with MAP arbitration provisions. II denotes treaties with the USSR that remain applicable until a separate tax treaty is concluded. III denotes treaties between the countries’ representative office in Taipei and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in the relevant country. IV denotes treaties that became effective within the last five years. V denotes treaties that are awaiting ratification. VI denotes MAP provisions identical to para 3, art 25 of the OECD Model Convention with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital. VII arbitration is to be conducted under the statutes of the ECJ. VIII arbitration is to be conducted under the statutes of the ICJ. www.dlapiper.com | 07
DLA PIPER CONTACTS Joel Cooper Randall Fox Partner, Co-Head International Partner, Co-Head of Transfer Pricing International Transfer Pricing T +44 207 796 6929 T +44 207 796 6928 M +44 773 829 5470 M +44 773 8295 935 joel.cooper@dlapiper.com randall.fox@dlapiper.com NEW ZEALAND Lynette Smith Special Counsel T +64 9 300 3812 lynette.smith@dlapiper.co.nz 08 | APA & MAP Country Guide 2018 – New Zealand
www.dlapiper.com DLA Piper is a global law firm operating through various separate and distinct legal entities Further details of these entities can be found at www.dlapiper.com. This publication is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with, and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication. This may qualify as “Lawyer Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Copyright © 2018 DLA Piper. All rights reserved. | AUG18 | 3318123
You can also read