AIR INDIA ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED - AIESL
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
AIESL AIR INDIA ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED
AIESL CONTENTS Page No. 1. Board of Directors 1 2. Directors’ Report 2 3. Comments of the Comptroller & Auditor General of India 16 4. Independent Auditors’ Report 18 5. Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2015 40 6. Statement of Profit & Loss for the year ended 31 March 2015 41 7. Cash Flow Statement 42 8. Notes forming part of the Financial Statements for the year ended 31 March 2015 43
AIESL BOARD OF DIRECTORS (as on 28 DECEMBER 2015) Shri Ashwani Lohani Chairman Shri Vinod Hejmadi Director Smt. Gargi Kaul Director Shri B S Bhullar Director Chief Executive Officer Shri H.R. Jagannath Auditors M/s. Jhawar Mantri & Associates Chartered Accountants Registered Office Airlines House 113 Gurudwara Rakabganj Road New Delhi 110 001 1
AIESL DIRECTORS' REPORT The Directors take pleasure in presenting the Eleventh Annual Report of the Company, together with the Audited Accounts, Auditors' Report and Comments by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, for the year ended 31st March, 2015. OPERATIONALISATION: The Board of Directors of Air India Limited, the parent company, at its Meeting held on 7 August 2010 approved operationalisation of Air India Engineering Services Limited. Cabinet Note for operationalisation was submitted to the Ministry of Civil Aviation. Cabinet had approved operationalisation of AIESL on 6 September 2012. It was proposed that the assets and manpower from Air India Limited will be transferred to Air India Engineering Services Limited as per the decision of the Cabinet. The Company will be treated as a separate profit centre for carrying out the Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) activities of Airbus and Boeing fleet. The process of operationalisation has accordingly started w.e.f. 1st February, 2013. Further, steps have been initiated to obtain/fulfil various Regulatory and Statutory approvals/compliances in order to start MRO activities. The company got DGCA approval CAR 145 effective January 2015. During the year 2013-14, the company (AIESL) had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with its parent company viz. Air India Ltd. (AI) regarding the services to be provided on maintenance and repair and overhaul facilities to Air India. The MoU inter-alia also includes the following:- 1. AI has decided to transfer its MRO business (including infrastructure) to AIESL. 2. AIESL shall obtain all necessary approvals / licenses etc. from all concerned statutory and regulatory authorities / agencies including DGCA of India to carry out & perform MRO activities. 3. AI shall provide AIESL a total equity of Rs. 375 Cr. during first three years and support required for Capital expenditure to the extent of Rs.974 crores till FY 2017. 4. AI shall transfer all its movable assets pertaining to MRO and the value of movable assets to be transferred by AI to AIESL to constitute & form part of the initial equity / investment in AIESL. 5. AIESL to share 20% of its labour revenue from third parties from the fourth year of operations or as mutually agreed. An MoU has also been entered into with Airline Allied Services Ltd. (AASL), a wholly owned subsidiary of AIL, wherein AASL has decided to transfer its MRO activities (including infrastructure) to AIESL and AASL agreed to commit its fleet in entirety for all MRO work to AIESL. Similarly, an MoU has also been entered into during 2014-15 with Air India Charters Ltd. (AICL), a wholly owned subsidiary of AIL, wherein AICL has decided to transfer its MRO activities (including infrastructure) to AIESL and AICL agrees to commit its fleet in entirety for all MRO work to AIESL. As such, AIESL shall be having committed business from Air India group along with infrastructure and other st support. The company as of 1 January, 2015 as also obtained DGCA certificate for the repair and overhaul of its facilities. Certificate of facilities for EASA and FAA would be procured shortly. MRO FACILITY AT NAGPUR As a part of commitment in the Purchase Agreement for fleet of 68 aircraft comprising 18 B737s, 23 B777s and 27 B787s with Air India Ltd., Boeing has invested about USD 107 million towards the MRO facility including certain Equipment/Tooling required for Aircraft Maintenance and associated Overhaul Shops for maintenance of aircraft and components. Additional investment of at least USD 10 Million is being made by Air India Ltd. to make the facility functional. The construction work commenced in March 2011 and the facility has been commenced and handed over to AI in December, 2014. 2
AIESL The facility consists of two wide body Hangars (100mx100m each), Support Building (approx. 24000 sq. m), Ground Support Equipment building and other Miscellaneous buildings. Initially the proposal is to take up the task of B777 major check(C Check) along with certain back shop activities like Cabin Survival Equipment/ Compressed Gas Oxygen Shop. The hangars are of international standard meeting NFPA 409 Fire standards (National Fire Protection Association) and equipped with facilities such as mechanised sliding door, underground utility pits, aircraft cabin cooling, hangar ventilation, Building Management System (BMS) etc. There are other peripheral amenities like rain water harvesting, effluent treatment plant, solar water heaters/street lights that contribute towards green initiatives. The necessary manpower to run the Nagpur facility has already been identified & transferred. AIESL will get right of use to these hangars in order to service the fleet of AI & third parties. Recently, the Nagpur MRO was approved for carrying out up to 'D' Check of B777 aircraft. All the major maintenance work of B777 aircraft shifted from January, 2016 to Nagpur. The process for seeking approval for A320 family aircraft has also been initiated. SETTING UP OF GEnx / GE90 ENGINE OVERHAUL AND TESTING FACILITY In order to supplement this MRO Facility at Mihan SEZ, Nagpur, Air India Ltd. has decided to set up an Engine Overhaul Facility for GEnx-1B Engine (powering B 787) and GE90 Engine (powering B 777), at an estimated cost of USD 89 Million. The Project will comprise following 3 stages: I Setting up GE90 Engine Testing Facility (Expected completion - May, 2016) II Upgrade of above I for testing GEnx Engines. (Expected completion -February, 2017) III Setting up GEnx / GE90 Engine Overhaul Workshop (Expected completion – December, 2017) Approx. USD 64.5 Million will be provided by GE Aviation as MRO Credit Allowance, as per the agreements signed with Air India Ltd., towards setting up of GEnx Engine Overhaul Facility· AIESL will get the right of use of these facilities. Shamshabad – Hyderabad MRO The MRO at Hyderabad was operationalised in May, 2015. Regular Checks of A319 and A320 aircraft of Air India are being carried out at this facility. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: The engineering activities of AI were hived off to the company as per the Cabinet approved TAP / FRP of AI and a MoU was executed for such hive-off indicating therein various supports from AI. In terms of the MoU, the parent company viz. AI shall transfer the movable assets (Workshop, Plant & Machinery and Tools etc.) to the company at its written down value (WDV) which shall form & constitute equity investment by AI. As per the MoU, the Company expects to receive Equity from AI to the extent of Rs 375 Crs. in the first three years of its operation in order to support its Capital acquisition program. During the financial year 2014-15, the company got the DGCA approval CAR 145 as an MRO effective 1st January, 2015, movable engineering assets were transferred from AI at the beginning of the financial year besides the payroll of engineering personnel was transferred w.e.f. October, 2014 from AI. The Share application money (deemed) of Rs. 166.62 Crs. is from AI on account of the assets transferred at its WDV to AIESL during the year. 3
AIESL The company made concerted efforts and spent on the infrastructure facilities, overheads and the manpower cost for its capabilities to acquire the DGCA approval CAR145. Based on the opinion from the Tax Consultants, an expenditure of Rs. 271.38 Crs. incurred for practically making ready the MRO Set up for obtaining DGCA License for its planned activities / work considered as directly attributable to DGCA License for future economic benefits has been capitalized as Intangible Assets. The company incurred a Net Loss after Tax has been Rs. 242.57 crores for the year 2014-15 i.e. the initial year of start of its commercial activities. The MRO is a Capital Intensive industry with high competitive environment with low returns and there is a long payback / cost absorption period in view of the fixed overheads on infrastructure facilities and high wage costs due to licensed manpower. Besides this, the Company has to depend on internally generated AI's business for substantial portion of its Revenue. However, with the expected growth in third party business and the incentives expected from GOI for the MRO industry, it is anticipated that AIESL will be operationally profitable in next few years. OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Share Capital : The Authorised Share Capital of the Company is Rs.10,00,00,000/-. The entire Paid-up Share Capital of the Company, amounting to Rs.5,00,000/- (50000 Equity Shares of Rs.10/- each) has been subscribed and paid- up by Air India Limited. The company has increased during the year 2015-16 its authorized share capital from Rs. 10 Crores to Rs. 1000 Crores to enable the company to issue shares for transfer of engineering assets from Air India. Share Application Money from Air India Ltd. In terms of the MoU executed, Air India shall transfer its movable assets (engineering - Workshop equipment, Plant & Machinery and Tools) at written down value (WDV) to the company and the WDV of such asset transfer shall constitute & form part of the initial equity / investment in the company by AI. Accordingly, the amount of Rs. 166.62 Cr. has been shown under this head representing the cost (WDV) of assets transferred. Market Q CAPA (Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation) projects Indian MRO Market to reach USD 2 billion by 2020 from approximately US$800 million today. Q India's scheduled airlines are expected to operate more than 1000 aircraft by 2020, up from 400 today. Q Target customers are both from India and outside with in flying distance of 5 hours Q It is prudent to tap the MRO market with the highly skilled manpower, vast infrastructure & wide spread network. AIESL Initiatives Q AIESL is aggressively pursuing its objective to establish itself as leading MRO in the region. Q Several initiatives taken to strengthen Line Maintenance, Base Maintenance, Cabin Maintenance to provide better service to Air India to improve Aircraft Availability, OTP and Cabin ambience. Q Some of the major initiatives by AIESL: Q Obtained CAR 145 Approval to Operate as MRO w.e.f. 01 Jan, 2015 Q Worked to obtain Design Service Goal extension from Airbus to enhance the life of classic A320 aircraft by 3500 FH Q Transferring All Contracts , FAA, EASA Approvals in the name of AIESL 4
AIESL Q Dedicated marketing team formed to capture third party business. Process of hiring Management consultant is underway Q 11 profit Centers have been identified. They are: DEL-1 (Line & Major), DEL-2 (Engines) ,DEL-3 (Components) BOM-1 (Line & Major WB), BOM-2 (Engines), BOM-3 (Components), NEC BOM (Line & Major NB) CCU-1 (Line & Major NB) HYD (Whole SR) NAG MRO & TRV MRO Q DGCA Approval of CAR 147 to operate as Aviation Maintenance Training Organisation – The approval granted by DGCA effective 16 Sept., 2015. Q AIESL has training facilities at Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Hyderabad and Thiruvananthapuram. Action Plan Q AIESL intends to give top class MRO service to its customers Q Dedicated Cabin maintenance Team Q Dedicated Tools Van setup – On the lines of International MROs (Tyre pressure, Fuel Drain) FAA / EASA (Federal Aviation Administration / European Aviation Safety Agency) Approvals: Q FAA / EASA approved Jet Engine overhaul shops at Delhi and Mumbai Q FAA approved Component overhaul shops at Delhi and Mumbai Q FAA approval for Mumbai hangar for B777 aircraft obtained Q FAA approval Nagpur hangar expected shortly for B777 aircraft (as extention to Mumbai). Q EASA approval for Component Overhaul Shops at Delhi & Mumbai obtained Future Plans Q To capture business of all airlines within flying distance of 5 hrs. Q Completion of GEnx / GE90 Testing & Overhaul Facility Q Third Party jobs at Jet Shops at DEL and BOM Q Third Party handling for Overhaul Shops Q ATEC (Automatic Test Equipment Complex) DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT: The Board of Directors of the Company confirm:- 1. that in the preparation of the Annual Accounts, the applicable accounting standards have been followed and there has been no material departure. 2. that the selected accounting policies were applied consistently and the Directors made judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent so as to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2015 and of the profit or loss of the Company for the year ended on that date. 5
AIESL 3. that proper and sufficient care has been taken for the maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting fraud and other irregularities, and 4. that the annual accounts have been prepared according to the going concern basis. 5. Company being unlisted sub clause (e) of section 134(3) is not applicable. 6. The directors had devised proper systems to ensure compliance with the provisions of all applicable laws and that such systems were adequate and operating effectively. STATUTORY AUDITOR REPORT M/s. Jhawar Mantri & Associates, Chartered Accountants, Mumbai, were appointed as Statutory Auditors for the year 2014-15 by the Comptroller & Auditor General of India. The Statutory Auditors' Report on the Accounts of the Company for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2015 along with observations/ Management's Replies thereon is attached. COMMENTS OF THE CONTROLLER & AUDITOR GENERAL The Comments of CAG dated 30-05-2016, were received pursuant to Section 143 (6) (b) of Companies Act 2013. The comments along with Management Reply thereon are attached. CHANGE IN NATURE OF BUSINESS There is no change in nature of business of the company. DIVIDEND The directors are not recommending any dividend as the company has not earned any profits. AMOUNTS TRANSFERRED TO RESERVES The Board of the company has decided/proposed to carry no amount to its reserves. CHANGES IN SHARE CAPITAL, IF ANY During the Financial Year 2014-15, there is no change in share capital of the Company. INFORMATION ABOUT SUBSIDIARY/ JV/ ASSOCIATE COMPANY Company does not have any Subsidiary, Joint venture or Associate Company. TRANSFER OF UNCLAIMED DIVIDEND TO INVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND Since there was no unpaid/unclaimed Dividend declared and paid last year, the provisions of Section 125 of the Companies Act, 2013 do not apply. MATERIAL CHANGES AND COMMITMENTS The particulars as required under the provisions of Section 134(3)(l), following changes have occurred which have affected the financial position of the company occurred between 31st March 2015 and the date of Board's Report. “Authorised Share capital of the company has been increased from Rs. 10 Crores to Rs. 1000 Crores.” MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS During the Financial Year 2014-15, the Company held Four meetings of the Board of Directors as per Section 173 of Companies Act, 2013 which is summarized below. The provisions of Companies Act, 2013 was adhered to while considering the time gap between two meetings. 6
AIESL S No. Date of Meeting Board Strength No. of Directors Present 1 09.07.2014 4 4 2 05.11.2014 4 3 3 26.11.2014 4 4 4 31.03.2015 3 3 DIRECTORS AND KMP The following changes a have occurred in the constitution of directors of the company: S.No Name Designation Date of appointment Date of cessation 1. Shri Rohit Nandan Chairman 13/09/2011 31/08/2015 2. Shri G Asok Kumar Director 11/02/2014 23/04/2014 3. Ms. M Sathiyavathy Director 26/02/2014 11/02/2015 4. Shri Arun Kumar Director 23/04/2014 01/01/2015 5. Shri S Venkat Director 27/12/2013 31/10/2015 6. Shri B S Bhullar Director 03/02/2015 EXTRACT OF ANNUAL RETURN In compliance with the provisions of Section 92(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 12(1) of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014, extract of Annual Return is annexed at Annexure-I. STATEMENT SHOWING DETAILS OF EMPLOYEES Section 197 read with Rule 5 of The Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 in respect of employees of the Company is not applicable to Government Companies Vide Notification No. G.S.R.463(E) Dated 5th June, 2015. INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND DECLARATION AIESL is a wholly owned Subsidiary of Air India Limited. As per the provisions of 97 Article of the Articles of Association of the Company, the number of Directors of the Company shall not be less than three and not more than fifteen all of whom shall be appointed by Air India Limited, who will prescribe the period for which they will hold office as director and may remove them and appoint others in their places and fill in any vacancy that may occur. Accordingly, the matter regarding appointment of Independent Directors on the Board of AIESL has been taken up by Air India Limited with the Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India. NOMINATION REMUNERATION AND STAKEHOLDERS RELATIONSHIP COMMITTEE As required under section 178, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee should consist of 3 or more Non Executive Directors out of which not less than one half should be Independent Directors. Presently there is no Independent Director on the Board of AIESL and the matter has been taken up with the Ministry of Civil Aviation by Air India Limited. 7
AIESL REMUNERATION POLICY Remuneration to Executive Directors and Non Executive Directors: Section 197 in respect of remuneration to directors of the Company is not applicable to Government Companies Vide Notification No.G.S.R.463(E) Dated 5th June, 2015 AUDIT COMMITTEE The provisions of Section 177 of Companies Act, 2013 are not applicable on the Company. Therefore, the Audit Committee was not constituted during the year. VIGIL MECHANISM Section 177(9) relating to establishment of Vigil Mechanism for directors and employees to report a genuine concern is not applicable to the Company. However, there is a separate Vigilance Department in Air India Ltd, Holding Company, which covers AIESL also. ORDER OF COURT No significant and material orders have been passed by the regulators or courts or Tribunals impacting the going concern status and company's operation in future during the year. DETAILS OF ADEQUACY OF INTERNAL FINANCIAL CONTROLS The system for adequacy of Internal Financial Controls with reference to the Financial Statements is yet to be established as the company has been operationalised recently. BOARD OF DIRECTORS: st During the year, the Board of Directors held four meetings. As on 31 March 2015, the Board consisted of the following Members:- Shri Rohit Nandan Chairman Chairman & Managing Director Air India Limited Shri B. S. Bhullar Director Joint Secretary Ministry of Civil Aviation Shri S. Venkat Director Director (Finance) Air India Limited ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The Board sincerely acknowledges the support and guidance received from the, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Ministry of Corporate Affairs and other agencies. For & on behalf of the Board (ASHWANI LOHANI) CHAIRMAN Place : New Delhi Date : 19 June 2016 8
AIESL Annexure to Directors' Report for the year 2014-15 Annexure FORM NO. MGT 9 EXTRACT OF ANNUAL RETURN As on financial year ended on 31.03.2015 Pursuant to Section 92 (3) of the Companies Act, 2013 and rule 12(1) of the Companies (Management & Administration) Rules, 2014. I. REGISTRATION & OTHER DETAILS: 1. CIN U74210DL2004GOI125114 2. Registration Date 11/03/2004 3. Name of the Company AIR-INDIA ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED (AIESL) Category/Sub category of the 4. Company Limited by shares/Union Government Company Company Address of the Registered office & AIRLINES HOUSE, 113 GURUDWARA RAKABGANJ 5. contact details ROAD, NEW DELHI –110001, Ph.No : 011-.23422109 6 Whether listed company No Name, Address & contact details of 7. the Registrar & Transfer Agent, if N.A. any. II. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITIES OF THE COMPANY (All the business activities contributing 10 % or more of the total turnover of the company shall be stated) - NIC Code % to total Sr Name and Description of main products / services of turnover of No the Product/ the service company 1 Technical Handling, MRO and other Services 9987 100% III. PARTICULARS OF HOLDING, SUBSIDIARY AND ASSOCIATE COMPANY: Holding / Sr. Name and Address of the % of Applicable Subsidiary / No. Company CIN/GIN Shares Section Associate 1 Air India Limited 113, Airlines House, U62200DL2007GOI161431 Holding 100% 2 (46) Gurudwara Rakabganj Road, New Delhi, 110 001. 9
AIESL IV. SHARE HOLDING PATTERN (Equity Share Capital Breakup as percentage of Total Equity) : Category-wise Share Holding No. of Shares held at the No. of Shares held at the end of the % Category of beginning of the year year [As on 31-03-2015] Change Shareholders [As on 01-04-2014] during the During % of % of year Demat Physical the Total Demat Physical Total Total year Shares Shares A. Promoters (1) Indian a) Individual/ HUF b) Central Govt c) State Govt(s) d) Bodies Corp. - 50,000 50,000 100 - 50,000 50,000 100 0.00 e) Banks / FI f) Any other Total shareholding of 50,000 50,000 100 - 50,000 50,000 100 0.00 Promoter (A) B. Public Shareholding 1. Institutions a) Mutual Funds/UTI b) Banks / FI c) Central Govt. d) State Govt.(s) e) Venture Capital Funds f) Insurance Companies g) FIIs h) Foreign Venture Capital Funds i) Others (specify) Foreign Banks Sub-total (B)(1):- - - - - - - - - - 10
AIESL No. of Shares held at the beginning of No. of Shares held at the end of the the year [As on 01-04-2014] year [As on 31-03-2015] % Change Category of % of % of during Shareholders Demat Physical Total Demat Physical Total Total Total the Shares Shares year 2. Non-Institutions Not Applicable a) Bodies Corp. (Market Maker + LLP) i) I Indian ii) Overseas b) Individuals i) Individual shareholders holding nominal share capital upto Rs. 1 lakh ii) Individual shareholders holding nominal share capital in excess of Rs. 1 lakh c) Others (specify) i) Non Resident Indians ii) Non Resident Indians - Non Repatriable iii) Office Bearers iv) Directors v) HUF vi) Overseas Corporate Bodies vi) Foreign Nationals vii) Clearing Members viii) Trusts ix) Foreign Bodies - DR Sub-total (B)(2):- - - - - - - - - - Total Public Shareholding (B) = - - - - - - - - - (B)(1)+ (B)(2) C. Shares held by Custodian for - - - - - - - - - GDRs & ADRs Grand Total (A+B+C) 50,000 50,000 100 - 50,000 50,000 100 0.00 11
AIESL B) Shareholding of Promoter- Shareholding at the beginning Shareholding at the end of the year of the year % change % of % of In Shares Shares Share- Sr. Shareholder's % of total % of total Pledged / Pledged / holding No. Name No. of Shares No. of Shares Encum- Encum- during Shares of the Shares of the the bered to bered company company year total to total shares shares Air India Limited 1 along with its 50,000 100 NIL 50,000 100 NIL 0.00 nominees C) Change in Promoters' Shareholding (please specify, if there is no change) Sr Particulars Shareholding at the Cumulative Shareholding No. beginning of the year at end of the year % of total % of total No. of No. of shares of the shares of the shares shares company company At the beginning of the year Air India Limited 50000 100% 50000 100% At the end of the year Air India Limited 50000 100% 50000 100% D) Shareholding Pattern of top ten Shareholders: (Other than Directors, Promoters and Holders of GDRs and ADRs): Shareholding at the Cumulative Shareholding beginning of the year at end of the year Sr For Each of the Top 10 Shareholders % of total % of total No No. of shares of No. of shares of shares the shares the company company 1 NOT APPLICABLE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12
AIESL E) Shareholding of Directors and Key Managerial Personnel: Shareholding at the Cumulative beginning of the year Shareholding at the end S. Shareholding of each Directors and % of total % of total No. each Key Managerial Personnel No. of shares of No. of shares of shares the shares the company company NIL Total V. INDEBTEDNESS -Indebtedness of the Company including interest outstanding/accrued but not due for payment. (In Rs Crore) Secured Loans Unsecured Total excluding Deposits Loans Indebtedness deposits Indebtedness at the beginning of the - - - - financial year i) Principal Amount 1030423 ii) Interest due but not paid iii) Interest accrued but not due Total (i+ii+iii) Change in Indebtedness during the - - - - financial year * Addition * Reduction 1030423 Net Change Indebtedness at the end of the - - - - financial year i) Principal Amount NIL ii) Interest due but not paid iii) Interest accrued but not due Total (i+ii+iii) NIL NIL - NIL 13
AIESL VI. REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS AND KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL A. Remuneration to Managing Director, Whole-time Directors and/or Manager: (In figures) Sr Name of MD/WTD/ Manager Total Particulars of Remuneration No Amount 1 Gross salary - - - - - - (a) Salary as per provisions contained in section 17(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (b)Value of perquisites u/s 17(2) Income- tax Act, 1961 (c)Profits in lieu of salary under section 17(3) Income- tax Act, 1961 2 Stock Option 3 Sweat Equity 4 Commissionas % of profitothers, specify. 5 Others : (PF, DCS, House Perks tax etc) Total (A) - - - - - - Ceiling as per the Act - - - - - - *There are no Managing, Whole Time Directors in the Company. B. Remuneration to other directors Sr Total Particulars of Remuneration Name of Directors No. Amount 1 Independent Directors - - - - - - Fee for attending board committee - - - - - - meetings Commission - - - - - - Others, please specify (Fees for attending Board Sub Committee - - - - - - Meetings) Total(1) - - - - - - 2 Other Non-Executive Directors - - - - - - Fee for attending board committee - - - - - - meetings Commission - - - - - - Others, please specify - - - - - - Total (2) - - - - - Total (B)=(1+2) - - - - - - Total Managerial Remuneration - - - - - - Overall Ceiling as per the Act - - - - - - - - - - - - 14
AIESL C. REMUNERATION TO KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL OTHER THAN MD/MANAGER/WTD ( figures in Rs) Sr. Key Managerial Personnel Particulars of Remuneration No. CEO CS CFO Total Not Not Not 1 Gross salary - Applicable Applicable Applicable (a) Salary as per provisions contained in section 17(1) of the Income-tax - - - - Act, 1961 (b) Value of perquisites u/s 17(2) Income-tax Act, 1961 - - - - (c) Profits in lieu of salary under section 17(3) Income-tax Act, 1961 - - - - 2 Stock Option - - - - 3 Sweat Equity - - - - 4 Commission - - - - - as % of profit - - - - Others, specify. - - - - 5 Others: (PF, DCS, House Perks tax etc) - - - - Total - - - - VII. PENALTIES / PUNISHMENT/ COMPOUNDING OF OFFENCES: Details of Section of Appeal Penalty / Authority the Brief made, if Type Punishment/ [RD / NCLT/ Companies Description any (give Compounding COURT] Act Details) fees imposed A. COMPANY Penalty - - - - - Punishment - - - - - Compounding - - - - - B. DIRECTORS Penalty - - - - - Punishment - - - - - Compounding - - - - - C. OTHER OFFICERS IN DEFAULT Penalty - - - - - Punishment - - - - - Compounding - - - - - 15
AIESL COMMENTS OF THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA UNDER SECTION 143(6)(b) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF AIR INDIA ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2015. The preparation of financial statement of Air India Engineering Services Limited for the year ended 31 March 2015 in accordance with the financial reporting framework prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013 is the responsibility of the Management of the Company. The Statutory Auditors appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India under section 139(5) of the Act is responsible for expressing opinion on the financial statements under Section 143 of the Act based on independent audit in accordance with Standards on auditing prescribed under section 143(10) of the Act. This is stated to have been done by them vide their Audit Report dated 31 March 2016. I, on the behalf of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), have conducted a supplementary audit under section 143(6)(a) of the Act of the financial statements of Air India Engineering Services Limited for the year ended 31 March 2015. This supplementary audit has been carried out independently without access to the working papers of the statutory auditors and is limited primarily to inquiries of the statutory auditors and company personnel and a selective examination of some of the accounting records. On the basis of my audit nothing significant has come to my knowledge which would give rise to any comment upon or supplement to Statutory Auditor’s Report. Balance Sheet Current Liabilities Other Current Liabilities Note No.8 Rs. 173.57 Crore A reference is invited to Note No.21(1) wherein disclosure regarding contingent liability of Rs.33.42 crore on account of 25 per cent balance payment of allowances to the employees from October 2014 has been made. As 75 per cent of the allowance payable to various categories of employees has already been paid and the revised pay structure has been implemented in respect of technical officers and aircraft maintenance engineers, the liability for service engineers should have been provided. Thus, non-provision has resulted in understatement of other current liability and understatement of loss for the year by Rs.33.42 crore. Sd/- Parama Sen Principal Director of Commercial Audit & ex-officio Member, Audit Board-II, Mumbai Place : Mumbai Date : 30 May 2016 16
AIESL MANAGEMENT REPLIES TO THE COMMENTS OF THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA UNDER SECTION 143(6)(b) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 ON THE ACCOUNTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,2015 Audit Observation Management Reply Balance Sheet In terms of the rationalized Pay-Scales determined Current Liabilities by the AI Management in line with the recommend- Other Current Liabilities Note No.8 Rs. 173.57 ations of the Justice Dharamadhikari Report (JDC), Crore the AI Management has paid 75% of the allowances payable to various categories effective July 2012 so A reference is invited to Note No.21(1) wherein that any adjustments as a result of the implement- disclosure regarding contingent liability of Rs.33.42 ation of the JDC Report could be made at the time of crore on account of 25 per cent balance payment of final settlement. The JDC recommendations are for allowances to the employees from October 2014 has AI as a whole prior to transfer of engineering payroll been made. As 75 per cent of the allowance payable to AIESL effective Oct. 2014. Therefore, in respect of to various categories, of employees has already the remaining 25% of the allowances, the Company been paid and the revised pay structure has been has provided for contingent liability to the extent of implemented in respect of technical officers and Rs.334.2 million from the date of transfer of aircraft maintenance engineers, the liability for Engineering Employees Payroll to the Company ie service engineers should have been provided. effective October-2014 on the basis of advice from Thus, non-provision has resulted in understatement the parent company. of other current liability and understatement of loss for the year by Rs.33.42 crore. Based on the JDC recommendations, the revised pay structure for Technical Officers (Support Service) and Aircraft Maintenance Engineers (AMEs) has since been implemented w.e.f. November-2014 and January 2015 respectively during the year under audit. The revised pay structure for Service Engineers was yet to be implemented. It may be mentioned that effective the date of implementation of the new Pay Structure for AMEs, Technical Officers, there is no liability to pay 25% as the Revised Pay Structure is already in line with the JDC recommendations & DPE Pay Scale. In respect of the period prior to this, the calculation of amount of 25% is yet to be completed since there would be deductions in respect of certain allowances which has already been made during past period and discontinued under the new pay structure. Unless the exercise of working out the arrears payable to all the employees is completed, the total quantum of liability on this account is not exactly ascertainable / quantifiable. It is also disclosed in Note 21.1-3rd para- “....Unless the exercise of working out the arrears payable to all the employees is completed, the total quantum of liability on this account is not exactly ascertainable”. 17
AIESL REPORT OF THE AUDITORS OF THE MEMBERS OF AIR INDIA ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Air India Engineering Services Limited ('the st Company') which comprises the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Company's Board of Directors are responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation and presentation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company's Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements. BASIS FOR QUALIFIED OPINION Attention is drawn to point no. 9 and 11 (C) of note no. 21 of notes to accounts and particularly note no. 9 (b) regarding capitalization of revenue expenditure incurred during the period from October 2014 to December 2014 as “other intangible assets” of Rs. 271,38,28,069/- which in our opinion is not in conformity with the 18
AIESL Accounting Standard -26 “Intangible Assets”, basic accounting assumptions, principles and qualitative characteristics of financial statements. Consequently expenses and losses are understated by Rs. 271,38,28,069, in the Profit & Loss account and Reserves and Surplus, negative balance in Profit & Loss Account is understated by Rs. 271,38,28,069 in the Balance Sheet. QUALIFIED OPINION In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matters described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2015, and its loss and its cash flows for the year ended on that date. REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2015 ('the Order'), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Act, and on the basis of such checks of the books and records of the Company as we considered appropriate and according to the information and explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure 1 a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable. 2. We are enclosing our report in terms of section 143(5) of the Act, on the basis of such checks of the books and records of the Company as we considered appropriate and according to the information and explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure 2 on the directions issued by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India. 3. As required by section 143(3) of the Act, we report that : a. We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit; b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books; c. The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account; d. Except for the effects of the matters described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above, in our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Account) Rules, 2014; e. In our opinion there is no adverse effect on the functioning of the company. f. On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31 March 2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Director is disqualified as on 31st March 2015, from being appointed as a Director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act; g. Except for the effects of the matters described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above, there is no qualification, reservation or adverse remark relating to maintenance of accounts and other matters connected therewith; and 19
AIESL h. With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us: i) The Company does not have any pending litigations which would impact its financial position. ii) The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses; and iii) There has not been an occasion in case of the Company during the year under report to transfer any sums to the Investor Education and Protection Fund. The question of delay in transferring such sums does not arise. For Jhawar Mantri & Associates Chartered Accountants (Firm Regn. No. 113221W) Sd/- Place : Navi Mumbai B. P. Mantri Date : 31 March 2016 Partner M. No. 045701 20
AIESL ANNEXURE 1 – TO INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT THE ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF ST THE COMPANY ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2015, WE REPORT THAT: 1. (a) The Company has maintained proper records of fixed assets showing full particulars including quantitative situation of Fixed Assets in the SAP system. (b) All the fixed assets have been transferred to the company during the year from its parent company. As informed to us the physical verification of major fixed assets has been conducted by the parent company for the biennial period of 2012-2014. 2. (a) The Company is not carrying on any trading or manufacturing activities. Accordingly clause relating to inventory is not applicable. 3. As informed to us, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to the companies, firms and other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. (a) Since there are no such loans, question of regular in repaying the principal or interest amounts as stipulated does not arise. (b) There are no overdue amounts of more than rupees one lakh in respect of the loans granted to the body corporate, firm and other parties listed in the register maintained under section 189 of the Act. 4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and for sale of goods and services. We have not observed any continuing failure to correct weakness in the internal control system during the course of our audit. 5. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public covered under section 73 to 76 of the Companies Act, 2013. 6. The Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under section 148(1) of the Act, for of the goods and services dealt in by the Company. 7. (a) The Company is not regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, income tax, service tax and any other statutory dues with the appropriate authorities. There are no amounts in arrears as at 31st March 2015 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable. (b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no material dues of income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax or cess which have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of any dispute (c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no amount which required to be transferred to investor education and protection fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made thereunder. 8. The Company is having accumulated losses of Rs. 242,67,09,080/- which is more than 50% of its net worth. During the year, the Company has incurred cash losses of Rs. 221,61,86,688/-. Cash Loss in the immediately preceding financial year was Rs. 31,059/-. 21
AIESL 9. The Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institution or bank or debenture holders. 10. In our opinion and according to the information and the explanations given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions. 11. In our opinion and according to the information given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained. 12. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company was noticed or reported during the year. For Jhawar Mantri & Associates Chartered Accountants (Firm Regn. No. 113221W) Sd/- Place : Navi Mumbai B. P. Mantri Date : 31 March 2016 Partner M. No. 045701 22
AIESL ANNEXURE-2 TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT Annexure referred to in our report of even date to the members of Air India Engineering Services Limited on the accounts for the year ended 31 March 2015. S. Directions under Section 143(5) Auditor’s Comment Impact on No. of Companies Act 2013 Financial Statement 1. If the Company has been selected for The Company has not been selected Not Applicable disinvestment, a complete status report in for disinvestment during the financial terms of valuation of Assets (including year 2014-15. intangible assets and land) and Liabilities (including Committed & General Reserves) may be examined including the mode and Present stage of disinvestment process 2. Please report whether there are any cases According to information and Nil of waiver/write off of debts/loans/interest explanations given to us, there are etc., if yes, the reasons there for and the no cases of waiver/write off of amount involved. debts/loans/interest etc. 3. Whether proper records are maintained According to information and Nil for inventories lying with third parties & explanations given to us, there is no assets received as gift from Govt. or other inventory lying with third parties and authorities. there is no assets received as gift from Govt. or other authorities. 4. A report on age-wise analysis of pending According to information and Nil legal/arbitration cases including the explanations given to us, there are reasons of pendency and existence/ no legal/arbitration cases pending effectiveness of a monitoring mechanism against the Company or filed by the for expenditure on all legal cases (foreign Company. an local) may be given. For Jhawar Mantri & Associates Chartered Accountants (Firm Regn. No. 113221W) Sd/- Place : Navi Mumbai B.P. Mantri Partner Date : 31 March 2016 M.N. 045701 23
AIESL MANAGEMENT’S COMMENTS ON OBSERVATIONS OF THE STATUTORY AUDITORS The management’s comments to the observations of the Auditors are as under : Most of the points raised by the Auditors are self-explanatory/statement of facts. Additional information/explanation wherever required are furnished below : Audit Observations Management’s Comment Report on the Financial Statements Statement of fact We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Air India Engineering Services Limited (’the Company’) which comprises the Balance Sheet as at 31st March 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statement of fact Statements The Company’s Board of Directors are responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (”the Act”) with respect to the preparation and presentation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implement- ation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s Responsibility Statement of fact Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these 24
AIESL Audit Observations Management’s Comment financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company’s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on whether the Company has in place an adequate internal financial controls system over financial reporting and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company’s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements. Basis for Qualified Opinion Attention is drawn to point no. 9 and 11© of note Any MRO prior to its operationalization has to take a no. 21 of notes to accounts and particularly note certification from DGCA and other Regulatory no. 9 (b) regarding capitalization of revenue authorities that it has the basic infrastructure and expenditure incurred during the period from licensed manpower support to start the operations of October 2014 to December 2014 as “other the Company. Though the manpower of AI was intangible assets” of Rs. 271,38,28,069/- which in transferred to the subsidiary company in February 2013, the Company could not commence business on a stand alone basis due to the various Court cases 25
AIESL Audit Observations Management’s Comment our opinion is not in conformity with the and Company not possessing the requisite license Accounting Standard-26 “Intangible Assets”, from DGCA and other authorities. After the Company basic accounting assumptions, principles and resolved its Court cases in May 2013 it took qualitative characteristics of financial considerable time to comply with the various statements. Consequently expenses and losses requirements of the licensing authorities before the are understated by Rs. 271,38,28,069, in the CAR 145 certification was issued by DGCA. This Profit & Loss account and Reserves and Surplus, required the Company to show that considerable negative balance in Profit & Loss Account is trained, licensed and experienced manpower along understated by Rs. 271,38,28,069 in the Balance with the infrastructure existed in the Company which Sheet. qualifies the Company for a Certification as MRO. It is, therefore, proposed to Capitalize the expenditure incurred by the Company mainly on manpower at least three months before it obtained the license for certification as License Cost. In this connection Management had relied on an opinion from the tax consultants wherein the revenue expenditure incurred including manpower cost directly attributable to DGCA License for CAR-145 MRO with certification for practically making ready the MRO Set up for obtaining DGCA License for its planned activities / work has been capitalized as Intangible Assets. The main conditions for capitalizing an internally generated asset as per As (Accounting Standard) 26 corresponding to IAS 38 (International Accounting Standard) as “Intangible Asset” is l Assets will generate future Economic benefits. l The Intangible asset is available for use l Ability to measure the expenditure attribut- able to the Intangible Asset. Since all these conditions are satisfied in the relevant case it has been decided to Capitalise the cost of obtaining a License under CAR 145. (A separate explanatory note along with the Opinion of Tax Consultants attached) Based on the clarifications given by the Management on the qualifications by the Auditors, the Manage- ment is of the view that there is no understatement of expenses, loss, Reserve & Surpluses and negative balance in Profit & Loss Account. 26
AIESL Audit Observations Management’s Comment Qualified Opinion In our opinion and to the best of our information and Audit Comments are noted. according to the explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matters described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2015, and its loss and its cash flows for the year ended on that date. 1. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2015 (’the Order’), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Act, and on the basis of such checks of the books and records of the Company as we considered appropriate and according to the information and explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure 1 a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable. 2. We are enclosing our report in terms of Statement of fact section 143(5) of the Act, on the basis of such checks of the books and records of the Company as we considered appropriate and according to the information and explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure 2 on the directions issued by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India. 3. As required by section 143(3) of the Act, we Statement of fact report that : (a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit; (b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books; (c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account; 27
AIESL Audit Observations Management’s Comment (d) Except for the effects of the matters described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above, in our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Account- ing Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Account) Rules, 2014; (e) In our opinion there is no adverse effect on the functioning of the company. (f) On the basis of the written represent- ations received from the directors as on 31 March 2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the Director is disqualified as on 31st March 2015, from being appointed as a Director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act; (g) Except for the effects of the matters described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph above, there is no qualified, reservation or adverse remark relating to maintenance of accounts and other matters con- nected therewith; and (h) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us: (i) The company does not have any pending litigations which would impact its financial position. (ii) The Company did not have any long- term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses; and (iii) There has not been an occasion in case of the Company during the year under report to transfer any sums to the Investor Education and Protec- tion Fund. The question of delay in transferring such sums does not arise. 28
You can also read