A smart city concept in the Arctic - from a post-industrial to liveable city
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
2019 ARCTIC FRONTIERS SMART ARCTIC TROMSØ NORWAY 20 - 24 JANUARY A smart city concept in the Arctic - from a post-industrial to liveable city Opportunities for and challenges to urban development and social cohesion in Russia's Arctic under climate change impacts Nikolai Bobylev1, Veli-Pekka Tykynnen2, Marian Paschke3, Alexander Sergunin1 1Saint Petersburg State University, Russia 2University of Helsinki, Finland 3Universität Hamburg, Germany E-mails: n.bobylev@spbu.ru 1
project outline • “Opportunities of and challenges to urban development and social cohesion in Russia’s Arctic under climate change impact” financed by • Era.Net RUS (RUS_ST2017-527) and Russian Foundation for Basic Research (№18-55-76003). • Funder ERA.NET Plus with Russia – strengthening STI links between Russia and the European Research Area • http://www.eranet-rus.eu 2
smart cities Smart city – a city that uses IT systems widely to optimise performance of infrastructure, services, and citizens’ lifestyles. A smart city possesses real time data, and adapts quickly, smoothly, and efficiently to changing internal and external factors with minimum human involvement (the ambition). A smart city includes: - smart systems (infrastructure) - smart citizens (users). Elements of a smart city: Transport networks; Variety of electric networks (smart grids); Social networks. 3
Institutionalizing smart cities "Implementing SDG11 by connecting sustainability policies and urban planning practices through ICTs" has been developed within the framework of the United for Smart Sustainable Cities (U4SSC) initiative. A study of the advantages of using ICTs to support the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals, in particular SDG 11, by facilitating the missing linkages that exist between sustainability policies and urban-planning practices through digitally-enabled urban actions. (???) 4
smart cities Cool buzz cities now: - Smart - Compact - Sustainable - Resilient - Climate neutral - Low carbon (infrastructure) - Liveable - (Ecological) 5
smart city solutions 1 Citizens’ control their (home) appliances via IT (mobile) devices, e.g. switching on heating just before coming home. – Energy efficient lifestyle; - Tailored high quality services provisioning. Opportunities to implement smart grids and IT systems in houses, buildings, and wider housing and infrastructure sector. 6
smart city solutions 2 A problem of urban water runoff after heavy rain Conventional solutions: Reduce runoff (trees, green zones); Increase capacity of drainage infrastructure. Smart city solutions: Manage runoff between city areas (valves, barriers, automated water management (smart grids)). Inform citizens to temporary cut domestic water use (e.g. for one-two hours). A storm water storage tank (right) adjacent to a sewer (left). Critical infrastructure: G-Cans, Tokyo is an underground Source: Berliner Wasserbetriebe infrastructure for prevention of flooding during rainy and Department of Urban Water season Management, Berlin Institute of 7 Source: G-Cans project, Tokyo (http://www.g-cans.jp/) Technology.
smart city solutions 3 the Crystal, a sustainable cities initiative by Siemens https://www.thecrystal.org/ The Crystal in London is home to the world's largest exhibition on the future of cities, as well as one of the world's most sustainable buildings and events venues.
Liveable cities Media The world's most liveable cities in 2018 | CNN Travel - CNN.com Community ! https://www.liv ablecity.org/ Science http://liveablecities.org.uk/updates/liveable-cities-final- outcomes 9
Liveable cities ‘Liveable Cities’ is a relatively new concept and, as such, liveability can be a loaded phrase with numerous definitions and expectations. Moreover, there will always be the push back of ‘liveable to whom…?’ and ‘what is liveable to one city dweller may not be to another’. Marianna Cavada, Dexter Hunt and Chris Rogers (2017) The Little Book of SMART CITIES ISBN 978-0-70442-949-9 MOIR, E., MOONEN, T. & CLARK, G. 2014 What are future future cities? Meanings and uses In: SCIENCE, G. O. F. (ed.). London Foresight 10
Liveable cities Data Article Leach et al (2017) Dataset of the livability performance of the city of Birmingham, UK, as measured by its citizen wellbeing, resource security, resource efficiency and carbon emissions. Data in Brief 15 (2017) 691–695 The livability of spaces: Performance and/or resilience? Reflections on the effects of spatial heterogeneity in transport and energy systems and the implications on urban environmental quality (International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment (2017) 6, 1–8) Unexploited opportunities in understanding liveable and biodiverse cities. A review on urban biodiversity perception and valuation (Global Environmental Change 39 (2016) 220–233) Quality of city life multiple criteria analysis (Cities 72 (2018) 82–93) 11
Liveable cities Walkable Environment in Increasing the Liveability of a City (AcE-Bs 2012 Bangkok ASEAN Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies, Bangkok, Thailand, 16-18 July 2012) More than this: Liveable Melbourne meets liveable Vancouver (Cities 31 (2013) 444–453) 12
Russian Arctic Towns AZRF cities Russian Arctic cities of Severodvinsk (top left), Murmansk (top right) and Vorkuta. Photos by Y. Ageeva.
Russian Arctic Towns Challenges – Aging infrastructure Accumulated environmental damage Climate change uncertainties Research agenda – Spatial structure (densities & services provisioning) Institutions (strategic planning in municipalities) Social structure
Sustainability and resilience goals in urban development Elements of resilience and sustainability related to urban development, Bobylev 2016 Urban challenges (liveability Resilience Synergy or conflict; strong Sustainability improvement) or moderate Utility services provisioning Reliable provisioning of infrastructure Moderate conflict Frugal resource use, reduced utility services services, backup infrastructure consumption, saving energy while infrastructure operation Infrastructure spatial arrangement Wide, ample space for each infrastructure Strong conflict Tight, aimed at saving space, energy, and element to avoid disturbance in case of the materials other failure Housing Safe, adapted to withstand disasters Moderate conflict Liveable and energy efficient Public spaces Designed to have additional capacity for Moderate conflict Designed to encourage sustainable lifestyles disaster response and reduction Transport Reliable transport links, designed to Strong conflict Minimal, aimed at consuming minimal energy withstand variety of stresses while maintaining services Green and recreational areas Ample, to adsorb disaster shocks and Strong synergy Ample, to provide quality of life provide refuge Optimal urban form Polycentric, to diversify risks Moderate synergy Compact, to save energy Society Coherent and informed Strong synergy Coherent and informed Population and building stock densities Optimal, not too low to be able to organize Unknown/specific to location Optimal, not too low to save land and energy common protection (flood management) and not too high to enable quality of life and not too high to enable disaster response (proximity of emergency services) 15 Climate change Increase industrial activities to be able to Strong conflict Decrease industrial activities to reduce
Research frameworks-paradigms-concepts to address challenges Geosystem services concept C.C.D.F. van Ree a,b, P.J.H. van Beukering, J. Boekestijn (2017) Geosystem services: A hidden link in ecosystem management. Ecosystem Services 2616 (2017) 58–69
Research frameworks-paradigms-concepts to address challenges Geosystem – ecosystem - infrastructure services Service to human Rural areas Urban areas Urban areas welfare developed countries developing countries developed countries Clean air to breath E E E Comfortable climate E E E conditions Water level in water E E EI bodies (for shipping, amenity, biota) Groundwater level E EI EI Water quality to use as E E E amenity and recreation Drinking water provision I I I Soil formation EI E I Waste decomposition E EI I Biological populations E EI I control Habitat E EI I Food I I I Raw materials E I I Recreation and outdoor E EI EI activities 17
Research frameworks-paradigms-concepts to address challenges Planning for sustainability – resilience – liveability - smart Types of planning (not a Ecosystem services Geosystem services hierarchical list, but rather relevance relevance examples of types) Land Use Yes Yes Spatial Yes Yes Adaptation Yes No Climate No No Urban Yes Yes Zoning No No Rural No Yes Regional Yes Yes Environmental Yes Yes Strategic Yes Yes Municipal No No Transport Yes Yes 18 Resource Yes Yes
Further Research 1.To develop an Arctic City Sustainable Development Index (ACSDI), which could be helpful for assessing the consequences of global climate change and anthropogenic activities for the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation (AZRF) urban centers. 2. The ACSDI will be used to evaluate the current situation and measure sustainability outcomes and progress toward achieving those outcomes in the AZRF cities that are growing due to resource development/transport infrastructure projects and migration, as well as those that for some reasons lack this growth. 3. Policy recommendations on sustainable development/social cohesion strategies for the AZRF local and regional governments as well as for the federal authorities and international organizations concerned will be developed. 19
references Projects: (1) Alexander von Humboldt Foundation project on Interplay between ecosystem and infrastructure services in the urban environments, (2) ERA.Net RUS Plus initiative and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research AUCAM project on “Opportunities for and challenges to urban development and social cohesion in Russia’s Arctic under climate change impacts” (ID # 527, 18-55-76003), (3) Freie Universität Berlin – Saint Petersburg State University Joint Seed Money Funding Scheme project on Sustainable Urbanization & Comparative Development.
Thank you for your attention! E-mail: nikolaibobylev@gmail.com 21
You can also read