A Peek at 5G Dr. Chih-Lin I - Johannesberg Summit
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
A Peek at 5G D r. C h i h - L i n I C M C C C h i e f S c i e n t i s t , W i r e l e s s Te c h n o l o g i e s Head of Green Communication Research Center Johannesberg Summit May 20, 2013
TD-LTE an Example • Number of TD-LTE BS: reached 20,000 by the end of 2012; Networks covering 15 cities in mainland; dual mode in HK • Deploy 200,000 BS in 2013; at least 1M terminals • Large Scale Trial (before 2012): 6 cities Cities • Expanded Scale Trial (2012): 15 cities • Commercial Network (2013): 100 cities 2013/5/20 6
Looking Towards 2020 EU FP7 and Horizon 2020 WWRF Vision 2020 3GPP Roadmap to Y’2020 UK “5G InnovaSon Center” METIS China IMT-‐2020 2013/5/20 Chih-‐Lin I 5
And Many Candidates Tech. Beyond OFDM(A) Transmission AAA/AAS Phy Network Coding GMC Single Band Full Deplux Relay/Terminal Relay Massive MIMO Random Coding Inno. Access Infrastructure SocCell Cloud Network Small Cell HetNet CoMP D2D Delay Tolerant Liquid Cell AdapSve Access DAS Terminal Intelli. Hyper Dense NW. ArSficial Collision Mana. CogniSve Radio Neural Network ICIC、eICIC M2M、MTC Carrier Aggregate Prototyping 。。。 。。。 2013/5/20
ICT Also Responsible • 2007 Worldwide ICT carbon footprint: 2% —Comparable to the global aviaSon industry • Expected to grow to 4% by 2020 CMCC Actual Scale PredicSon with “power efficient” technologies 2012: 1.11M BSs, 14.3B Kwh 2013/5/20 Chih-‐Lin I 11
Great Work Done BS HW (Antenna, PA), Improved macro-‐cell hardware(H), Cell micro Architecture (Relay, AP), DTX (D), Antenna muLng (A), Low loss antennas OperaLon (Sleep mode, (L), AdapLve sectorizaLon (S) Scheduler) Energy savings of 60-‐70% with no more than 5% Throughput degradaLon Energy gain of 75-‐92% 2013/5/20 Chih-‐Lin I 12 Mobile VCE SimulaSon Results Energy saving Performance
More Ambitious Goals 2013/5/20 Chih-‐Lin I 13
Green Meter Announcement May 13, 2013, GreenTouch Announces: Research study shows net energy consumpSon in networks can be reduced by up to 90% by 2020 while taking into account traffic growth 2013/4/8 Chih-‐Lin I 14
SOFT
Cost, Efficiency, Agility Diverse ApplicaLons & Infrastructures GSM UE •Complex carrier networks: GSM/GPRS/ TD-‐SCDMA EDGE proprietary nodes and TD-‐SCMDA UE hardware. •New std and features launch WiMax/WLAN TD-‐LTE UE TD-‐LTE cycle too long: new variety of 2013/5/20 box needs Chih-‐Lin I to be integrated. 16
SDR: First considered in the 90’s • SDR: radio is software defined • Basic idea: signal processing developed based on reconfigurable HW platforms (however the platform may be vendor- TradiSonal dedicated HW proprietary) instead of special-purpose SDR platform • Motivation: – Different radio products implemented on the same platform – Software reuse among different products – Remote software download and updates SDR products: soc modem, SDR controller, etc. 2013/5/20
SDN: It is happening out there • SDN: – Separation of control plane and data plane – GPP-based programmable controller to reconfigure routing policy (i.e. control plane) • Potential benefits – Cost reduction on routers thanks to software programmability from GPP – Facilitate orchestration of networks – Services-aware routing • SDO to hit the target of SDN • 90+ member companies of all sizes, including network operators, service providers, etc., from not only IT but telecom industry 2013/5/20
Network Function Virtualization Classical Network Appliance NFV Approach Approach Independent Socware Vendors CompeSSve & Ecosystem InnovaSve CDN Session Border WAN Message Controller AcceleraSon Independent Router Socware Vendors Orchestrated, DPI Firewall Carrier Tester/QoE automaSc & remote install. Grade NAT monitor High volume standard servers SGSN/GGSN PE Router BRAS Radio/Fixed Access Network Nodes High volume standard storage • Fragmented non-‐commodity hardware. • Physical install per appliance per site. • Hardware development large barrier to entry for new vendors, constraining innovaLon & compeLLon. High volume Ethernet switches 2013/5/20 Chih-‐Lin I 19
C-RAN Concept Virtual BS Pool Centralized Control and/ … … or Processing Ø Centralized processing resource pool that can support Real-time Cloud 10~1000 cells for centralized processing Collaborative Radio Ø Multi-cell Joint scheduling and processing Real-Time Cloud High bandwidth optical transport Ø Target to Open IT platform network Ø Consolidate the processing resource into a Cloud Ø Flexible multi-standard RRU operation and migration RRU Distributed RRURRU Clean System Target Ø Less power consuming RRU Ø Lower OPEX RRU RRU RRU Ø Fast system roll-out Soc base-‐staLon – seamlessly scalable and upgradable
Cloud RAN: Soft BS, Virtualization • Virtualization of RAN for agility – Multiple BBU entities in the same physical servers – Multi-RAT support: RAT on virtual Common IT plamorm based – machine Accommodate Service on Edge soluSons for both radio access • Cost reduction and resource utilization network and core network improvement: – Resource sharing and dynamic allocation according to traffic variation TD-‐SCDMA BS TD-‐LTE BS Service VM GSM BS – Live migration to consolidate resource, further to save power CDN/ Socware Socware Socware Web Stack Stack Stack cache GSM UE Virtual Machine Pool/ RT-‐Guest OS (Linux) GSM/TD-‐S/TD-‐L RRU RT-‐Hypervisor IT HW plamorms (x86, Power, ARM) TD-‐SCMDA UE CPRI adaptor L1 accelerator TD-‐LTE UE CPRI 2013/5/20 Standard servers
5 Pearls
CMCC Vision on 5G ContentPool IT based core network Virtual BB pool Indoor Coverage Anchor BS Anchor BS Anchor BS Nano AP Massive RRU relay User Centric Access Network SupporLng exclusive usage of available spectrum of each user D2D Relay D2D Two Major Themes Green Soc EE-‐SE Co-‐design No More Rethinking Our Pearls System “Cells” Signaling/Control 2013/5/20 Invisible “BS” 2G Spectrum Refarming Chih-‐Lin I …23
EE and SE Co-Design Spectrum efficiency no longer the only criteria Energy efficiency must be considered side by side in mobile internet era • Increasing gap between traffic and revenue growth • Increasing gap between traffic Kliper et.al., IEEE JSTQE, 2011 and EE growth Great potenSals on energy saving exists Traffic fluctuaSon in both Sme and Ultra dense network roll out 2013/5/20 spaSal domains
EE and SE Co-Design PredicSon based on Shannon: But, Non-‐monotonic when considering circuit power Monotonic tradeoff Perfect CSI (serving cell only) Given EE, two SE values exist Imperfect CSI, block fading channel, coherence of 2, 4, 8, or 16 symbols (bosom to top) Data from Bell Labs More complicated with extended power models 2013/5/20 Component level power model Different configuraSons
EE and SE Co-Design A unified EE/SE theory framework should be developed to harmonize the research acSviSes Conclusion draw from EARTH project Conclusion draw from LSAS theory -‐-‐ Antenna muLng can save -‐-‐ More antennas, less power power 2013/5/20
LSAS (Tom Marzetta) When only radiated power is considered When addiSonal computaSon power is also considered (grow with #Antenna) üAlways tradeoff between EE and SE with a üEE increases with SE in low SE region given # of antennas (M) üFewer antennas is more helpful to üEE/SE relaSonship is improved in whole by improve the EE in low SE region increasing # of antennas üAs the computaSon capability (Gflops/Was) increases, the EE is enhanced and using 2013/5/20 Chih-‐Lin I 27 more antennas is preferred
Circuit Power: #Subcarriers & #Antenna (Zhikun Xu) When the number of subcarriers can be switched on or off adapSvely in MIMO-‐ OFDM systems Note: • Solid part of each cure denotes the case that the subcarriers are not used up •Dash part denotes the case that no subcarriers are available üWhen the subcarriers are not used up, EE increases with SE üIncreasing # of antennas benefits the EE only when no subcarriers are available. üIncreasing the frequency resources is more energy efficient than increasing the spaSal 2013/5/20 resources Chih-‐Lin I 28
No More “Cells” The “Cellular” concept has accompanied wireless network from 1G to 4G Douglas H. Ring & W. Rae Young • StaSc network planning & semi-‐staSc opSmizaSon 1947 at Bell Lab • Cell-‐centric RRM • Increased flat network scale and power consumpSon 4G • … 3G 1G 2G It’s Sme to break out from the “Cells” for 5G Different perspecSves to match 2020 needs Deployment Resources • Infrastructure • Network-level RRM virtualization Features • Spectrum Protocols • Network-level CRM • No cell physical ID • Network-level SP virtualization • Signalling/data • No inter-cell • Centralization decuoping interference • UL/DL decoupling • No handoff 2013/5/20
No More “Cells” The wireless world has been on the way , more or less, to revamp the “cell” concept. BCG2 Break in Protocol Break in Signal Processing Signalling/data decuoping CoMP processor Hetnet CoMP micro Short-‐term sales-‐ From single-‐ up potenSal From cell-‐level SP layer coverage to coordinatd SP macro to mulS-‐layer femto among CoMP set coverage Coordinated multi-points Tx/Rx DAS From cell-‐level SP to Break in coverage centralized SP Break in RRM DAS: Distributed (large-scale) antenna system BBU RRU RRU … RRU RRU 2013/5/20
No More “Cells” C-‐RAN will be a fundamental element in the architecture of next generaSon wireless network Virtual BS Pool Virtual BS Pool • Common plamorm, socware … X2+ based soluSon PHY/MAC PHY/MAC PHY/MAC PHY/MAC • Live (soc) computaSon Real-‐Lme Cloud for resource transiSon centralized processing • Inherent cooperaSon High bandwidth opLcal transport network Distributed configurable wideband RRU RRU RRU RRU RRU RRU RRU RRU 2013/5/20 BS virtualizaSon
No More “Cells” The transiSon from Network-‐Centric to User-‐Centric Rethink Handover Unified broadcast control MulLcast control MS1 DL & UL data transmission MS3 MS2 DL data transmission UL data transmission Amorphous Cells Concept Multiple layers Signaling & Data Decoupling DL&UL Decoupling 2013/5/20
Rethinking Signaling/Control New signaling mechanism should be invesSgated to reduce the signaling overhead Data signaling raSo(DSR) DSR raSo of current network is extremely low of IM • TradiSonal voice: 100~600 Voice IM(QQ) • IM(QQ):
Rethinking Signaling/Control TCP should be revisited for mobile environment -‐-‐ To improve the QoE of end customers • Conventional TCP protocol designed u Exciting finding by MIT with coding for TCP for wire network with low latency and over WiFi • From 1Mbps to 16Mbps under typical 2% packet low packet loss rate, loss. • Extreme poor performance over • From 0.5Mbps to 13.5Mbps under 5% packet on wireless network the train. Throughput Rate vs. Packet loss rate & Latency in Wireless Network 2013/5/20
Rethinking Signaling/Control Network Coding Mobile TCP over 3GPP p New protocol stack only at mobile access network • A Network Coding layer between TCP layer and IP layer p Practical Scheme for deployment • A TCP agency added in gateway • Keeping TCP protocol unchanged in core network Gb Gn 2G SGSN BSC/PCU Iu GGSN BTS S3 MME S4 Internet TD NodeB RNC S1-‐MME S11 S1-‐U S5/8 LTE eNodeB Serving GW PDN GW 2013/5/20
Making BS “Invisible" p TradiSonal BS roll out is no longer sustainable • Environment unfriendly • Hard for site selecSon, network planning • High cost • High power consumpSon Antenn a Layers Bottom PCB with RF transceiver , FPGA, and Memory PA Integration Power & Fiber Outputs 2013/5/20 Chih-‐Lin I 36
Making BS “Invisible" Small form factor compact RF/Antenna module is the key 15cm X 15cm X 7cm Antenna Layers Bottom PCB with RF transceiver, FPGA, and Memory 5cm X 5cm X 3cm PA Integration Power & Fiber Outputs ? Front View Side View Terminal RFIC based Wide band patch antenna Flexible Three layers of stacked radiators Two layers of radiators 2013/5/20 Chih-‐Lin I 37
Making BS “Invisible" Large scale cooperaSon over modules is necessary (LSAS)à Sweet Spot of N*M Performance Enhancement Energy saving Cap. Enhancement 2013/5/20 Chih-‐Lin I Central processing for 38 cooperaSon
2G Spectrum Refarming 10x (?) more spectrum for 2020 Channel measurement at 28GHz (from Samsung) Candidate spectrum proposed by different stakeholders p 3GPP LTE-Hi for hotspot and indoor p (3.4GHz-‐3.6GHz) 4.4GHz – 4.5GHz and 4.8GHz – 4.99GHz (Chinese pHigh frequency bands are p government in WP5D 15th meeSng) 3.3GHz – 3.4GHz (Chinese companies) idenSfied and/or invesSgated p 3.4 – 3.6 MHz, 3.6– 4.2GHz and 4.4 – 4.9GMHz (Japan) for capacity enhancement p p 5925 – 6425MHz (Russia) and above 6GHz (Kor) … pCoverage and mobility? 2013/5/20
2G Spectrum Refarming OpSon 1: Used by LTE p Beyond 2020, 2G networks are very likely not needed. p 2G spectrum refarming should be considered seriously. GSM900: 35MHz DL/UL ETACS/EGSM TACS/GSM GSM ETACS/EGSM TACS/GSM GSM OpSon 2: New OpSmized Design 880 890 905 915 925 935 950 960 p Operates in standalone mode, with network DCS 1800: 75MHz DL/UL architecture, signaling, PHY/MAC protocols, etc, UL DL being optimized 1710 1785 1805 p With full duplex? 1880 3G: 150MHz TDD, 120MHz FDD TDD FDD p IoT optimized? p operates as an umbrella signaling network, to 1755 1785 1850 1880 1920 1980 2010 2025 2010 2170 2200 2300 2400 assist LTE, WiFi, etc in 2020 2013/5/20
Summary • The future must be “Green” • “Soc” from core network to RAN • Thoughts on 5G: • EE/SE Co-‐design • No more “Cells” • Rethink Signaling/Control • BS “invisible” • Refarm 2G spectrum • … 2013/5/20 Chih-‐Lin I 41
Thank Thank you Y ou
You can also read