A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy - Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period
Forewords You have in your hands the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community’s three-part summary of work in the field of demography during the current legislative period: policy and research, in analogue and digital form, in specific subject areas and across disciplines. Demography is one of the oldest social sciences, and the size of its target group is impressive: it includes the entire population, from the youngest to the oldest. The Fed- eral Government’s demographic strategy, ʻEvery Age Countsʼ, launched a broad-based © Bundesregierung/Kugler examination of demographic challenges and opportunities in our country. During this legislative period, the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community focused on achieving the strategy’s goals through intensive dialogue in the regions and exten- sive knowledge transfer from theory to practice. Because Germany also held the Presi- dency of the Council of the European Union in the second half of 2020, intensive dis- cussions with our European neighbours also played a large role. This is reflected in the two demography volumes of the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community and the Federal Institute for Population Research. In these volumes, you will find a wealth of practical examples and research find- ings, as well as a special chapter on preparing for future demographic developments as the baby boomer generation ages and on the relevance of population data during the Covid-19 pandemic. The volumes look back at trends over the past ten years and ahead at those to come in the next decade. As the sponsor of the programmes Work4Germany and Tech4Germany, I am especially pleased that the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community was one of the hosts for the first group of programme participants and in this way helped the demography report to appear in digital form and thus make demography accessible online as well. I invite you to find out more about important demographic issues with the help of graphics, videos, links and other informa- tion both online and offline, and I wish you enjoyable and interesting reading. Prof. Dr Helge Braun, MdB/Member of the Bundestag Head of the Federal Chancellery and Federal Minister for Special Tasks 2 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
Developing strategic approaches is one of the central tasks of every Federal Govern- ment. The broader the range of issues, the more complex the strategic architecture which must be created in response. The broad scope of the Federal Government’s demographic strategy is already apparent in its title, ʻEvery Age Countsʼ. A population of more than 83 million includes a multitude of complex constellations: young and old, married and single, employed and retired, those who are mobile and those who are settled – each of us belongs to this population, with our needs and desires for social cohesion, functioning infrastructure and viable economic and finance systems. All of this is part of a fragile system of interdependencies and conflicts which © BMI/Bertrand must be brought into balance and resolved. A carefully thought-out and precisely coordinated strategy lays the essential ground- work for this effort. But without practical implementation, such a strategy would remain just an ambitious plan. During the current legislative period, the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community has made implementation a priority. As lead ministry, it has been active at all levels and across all areas of action within the scope of the strategy: engaging in local community dialogues on demography in north and south, working with other federal ministries to prepare the public service for future demographic developments, and discussing with our European neighbours the many things we have in common when it comes to population trends in Europe. The scientific discipline of demography can see – at least for a certain span of time – into the future and offer models and calculations to prepare us for current trends and future developments. Population growth due to immigration, population ageing due to longer life expectancy and low birth rates, regional differences in prosperity – none of these is unique to Ger- many. Supplying precise, science-based analyses in place of perceived notions is the task of the Federal Institute for Popula- tion Research, located in Wiesbaden. The Covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated how relevant and valuable demographic research can be, for example in comparing hospital capacities to the percentage of residents with pre-existing medical condi- tions in different regions. On this topic and many others, you will find comprehensive explanations and practical examples in these two volumes pro- duced by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community, on its website and on the website of the Federal Institute for Population Research. I wish you a pleasant journey into the world of demography! Dr Markus Kerber State Secretary at the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 3
Contents I. Understanding and shaping demographic developments: together and with a focus on opportunities! 6 1. Demographic development or ‘facts versus fake news’ 8 2. Equivalent living conditions – Commission mandate and pillar of the demographic strategy 14 3. ...and beyond: challenges and opportunities in almost all areas of life, or ‘The Federal Government’s demographic strategy’ 16 4. ‘Every Age Counts’ as a political mandate: the management aspirations of the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community 20 II. A cross-cutting view of demography – examples of national implementation 26 1. Together on site in the dialogue on demography: municipality – federal state – Federal Government 28 2. Working in interministerial and federal-state groups – change is taking place across disciplines and with different impacts on regions 32 3. Demographic Portal with a new look: modern and responsive design to support the launch of the ‘federal state months’ 34 4. Policy advice: tailor-made in all directions 38 5. Demographic security on the labour market: the public service takes the lead 42 III. The emergence of a European network 46 1. Initiative at EU level 48 2. Bilateral exchange 50 3. Not together and yet very close: virtual and ministerial at EU level 52 IV. Demography – a global issue 54 1. United Nations Commission on Population and Development 56 2. Looking to Asia and beyond 60 3. A portal reaches out into the world – with a suitcase packed with know-how! 64 V. The Covid-19 pandemic – editing and communicating population structure data 66 VI. Demography 4.0 or ‘Every age retold’ 72 VII. Looking to the future 76 1. Continue to apply tried-and-tested concepts 78 2. Building on global developments and setting specific accents 80 Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 5
I. Understanding and shaping demographic developments: together and with a focus on opportunities! 6 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
Source: pixelfit/E+/Getty Images Demographic change will significantly alter the conditions As part of its demographic policy, the Federal Government for developing prosperity and quality of life in Germany in aims to create the best possible foundation for strengthen- the coming years and decades. Our society is getting older ing economic growth potential and maintaining the level of and in the long run at least is likely to become smaller. It prosperity for future generations, and the conditions for will also become more diverse, also as a result of immigra- this are more favourable than ever before. They will be tion. Processes related to the population are crucial for all briefly described below and supported by facts and figures. important areas of life: the concentration of the population After all, politics must be understandable and transparent. in certain regions and labour markets, housing and com- And this is also the best way to counter false claims or fake muting, demand for school education, demand for and use news which are also seen in conjunction with demographic of digital infrastructures, healthcare services and much policy aspects, for instance, with regard to birth rates or more. These factors, for their part, also determine how long migration movements. It is true that ‘fake news’ has always and how healthy people live, where they settle and how existed and always will. In times of social media, when lies many children they (want to) have. and false reports can spread all over the world in a matter of seconds, however, it is important to prevent and counter these with determination and to provide science-based facts with an even greater reach. Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 7
1. Demographic development or ‘facts versus fake news’ Since reunification, Germany has grown from 79.9 million people in 1990 to 83.2 million today (as of 2019). The expectation expressed in the Federal Government’s 2011 Between 2011 and 2019, around 13.4 million people moved Demography Report, i.e. that the negative population growth to Germany, whilst 9 million left the country. Around two trend observed since 2003 will continue and intensify in the thirds of immigrants came from European countries (includ- coming years, has thus not been confirmed. The migration ing the Russian Federation, excluding Turkey). The migration movements from (eastern and southern) European countries balance (inflows minus outflows, also termed net immigra- have been primary contributors since 2011. What’s more, tion) hence amounted to 4.4 million people during this large numbers of people seeking protection were recorded, period. A net total of 2.6 million people moved to Germany especially in 2015 and 2016. Even though immigration from from European countries, including around 2.2 million from non-European countries has often been the focus of atten- the EU. Almost 1.7 million net immigrants came from Asia tion in recent years, the vast majority of immigrants to Ger- and a good 300,000 from Africa. many came from Europe, except for the years 2015 and 2016. Fig. 1: Net migration between Germany and world regions in the period from 2011 to 2019 Europe (including Russia, excluding Turkey) 2.6 Asia (including Turkey) 1.7 Africa 0.3 America 0.1 Australia 0.0 Unknown origin and/or destination region -0.3 Net inbound and outbound migration in millions Data source: Federal Statistical Office, calculations and diagram: Federal Institute for Population Research 8 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
Since 2012, the birth rate in Germany has also risen noticea- At the same time, more and more people are living longer bly – albeit at a low level – and in 2016 reached 1.59 children with better physical and mental health. At present per woman, the highest level since 1972. In 2019, the birth (2017/2918 mortality table), life expectancy for newborn girls rate was slightly lower at 1.54 children per woman, but still is 83.4 years, for newborn boys 78.6 years and is hence about above the long-term average. The increase in birth rate was five years higher for girls and about seven years higher for seen among women of both foreign and German nationality. boys than in 1990. Fig. 2: Life expectancy at birth in West and East Germany* (1990/1992 to 2017/2019) Life expectancy in years 85 80 75 70 65 1990/1992 1995/1997 2000/2002 2005/2007 2010/2012 2017/2019 Men/West Women/West Men/East Women/East *from 1999/2001 without Berlin in each case Data source: Federal Statistical Office, diagram: Federal Institute for Population Research A high life expectancy, along with a persistently low birth cantly lower in the majority of these countries. This birth rate despite an increase in recent years, characterises the rate would be needed for the child generation to maintain process of demographic ageing, which Germany has in the parent generation. A birth rate permanently below this common with most industrialised Western nations. The level without immigration would hence result in the next birth rate is currently below 2.1 children per woman in all generation becoming smaller than the previous generation. European and North American countries and even signifi- Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 9
Fig. 3: Birth rate (children per woman) in world regions and selected countries (2015 to 2020) Niger 7.0 Somalia 6.1 Nigeria 5.4 AFRICA 4.4 WORLD 2.5 OCEANIA 2.4 India 2.2 ASIA 2.2 LATIN AMERICA AND CARRIBBEAN 2.0 France 1.9 United States 1.8 NORTH AMERICA 1.8 China 1.7 EUROPE 1.6 Germany 1.6 Japan 1.4 Italy 1.3 Singapore 1.2 South Korea 1.1 Data source: UN, diagram: Federal Institute for Population Research This process poses challenges that result mainly from a be it because they expect better employment opportunities changed relationship between younger and older popula- elsewhere or because they want more access to education tions, for example, on labour markets and in social security and infrastructure facilities of all kinds for themselves and systems. And this is particularly felt where younger people their children. in particular leave their homes for another part of Germany, Fig. 4: Share of old population in selected countries and world regions (2020) Ratio of older people (65+) to working age population (20 to under 65 years) Japan 1 : 1.9 Italy 1 : 2.5 France 1 : 2.7 Germany 1 : 2.7 United 1 : 3.1 EUROPE 1 : 3.1 United States of 1 : 3.5 China 1 : 5.4 Kingdom America ASIA 1 : 6.8 India 1 : 8.8 AFRICA 1 : 13 Nigeria 1 : 15.8 Data source: UN, calculations and diagram: Federal Institute for Population Research 10 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
Fig. 5: Population by age group in world regions and selected countries (2020) Nigeria AFRICA India WORLD 2.7 3.5 6.6 9.3 35.3 33.3 43.1 54.1 45.8 50.7 58.1 57.4 LATIN AMERICA AND CARRIBBEAN ASIA United States NORTH AMERICA 9.0 8.9 16.6 24.8 16.8 24.4 32.1 31.2 59.0 60.0 58.6 58.8 China EUROPE Germany Japan 12.0 23.4 19.1 21.1 21.7 18.9 28.4 17.0 64.6 59.8 59.4 54.6 Share in percent: Under 20 years 20 to 64 years 65 years and older Data source: UN, calculations and diagram: Federal Institute for Population Research Fig. 6: Life expectancy at birth in world regions and selected countries (2015 to 2020) Japan 84 Switzerland 84 Italy 83 France 83 Germany 81 United States 79 OCEANIA 78 EUROPE 78 China 77 LATIN AMERICA AND CARRIBBEAN 75 ASIA 73 WORLD 72 India 69 AFRICA 63 Nigeria 54 Lesotho 54 Central African Republic 53 Data source: UN, diagram: Federal Institute for Population Research Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 11
Migratory movements in the form of immigration, but one hand, to increased migration to predominantly rural especially internal migration within Germany determine the areas. What’s more, the still positive migration rates of distribution of people in the country in terms of numbers people aged between18 and 29, the so-called training and and age. Besides predominantly rural regions, east German job migrants, to cities are no longer as high as before, and regions were particularly hit by emigration in the past. at the same time there is a growing trend away from cities Between 1991 and 2019, for example, a total of 3.9 million among those aged between 30 to 49, who are also known people moved from east to west. On balance, the eastern as family migrants. And, finally, since 2017, more people German states (excluding Berlin) lost a total of 1.2 million have been moving from the west to the east than in the people to emigration to the west. However, it should also opposite direction. Some of them return to their home be noted that a trend reversal has also been observed in the regions. area of internal migration since 2011. This is due, on the Fig. 7: Migration between West and East Germany* (1991 to 2019) Persons (in thousands) 250 200 150 Migration loss, East Germany 100 50 0 1991 2000 2009 2018 Moves from East to West Moves from West to East * in each case without Berlin Data source: Federal Statistical Office, calculations and diagram: Federal Institute for Population Research That being said, the distribution and age composition of the tion are already being felt today: While the average age in population in Germany’s regions continue to vary consider- Germany in 2019 was 44.5 years, five districts or urban dis- ably. They add to the considerable disparities that already tricts recorded an average age of over 50 years, including exist within Germany, both in terms of regional income and the urban district of Suhl with the highest average age employment opportunities and in terms of ensuring mobili- (50.8 years) of all districts and urban districts in Germany. ty and access to services of general interest. Structurally On the other hand, the average age was less than 41 years strong regions also benefit from the influx of qualified in six districts or urban districts, including the urban district people from Germany and abroad. Structurally weak of Heidelberg with the lowest average age (40.4 years). regions usually do not attract these people while at the 36 out of every 100 people aged 20 to 64 in Germany were same time even losing younger, often well-educated over 65. In the east, the corresponding figure of 46 is signi people. The consequences of these trends for age distribu- ficantly higher than in the west, where it is 35 (in each case 12 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
excluding Berlin). This has a corresponding impact on ser- i vices of general interest. The Federal Ministry of the Interi- or, Building and Community, with its community depart- ment and in its capacity as coordinator of demographic policy, addresses the issue of equivalent living conditions from several perspectives, see, in particular, chapter I.2. The Federal Institute for Population Research is a feder- al departmental research institution under the responsi- Fig. 8: Average age in districts and urban districts (2019) bility of the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community. It conducts basic research on the Rank Urban district or district, resp. Average age causes and consequences of demographic change and is 1 Heidelberg, urban district 40.4 also active in the field of policy advice. More on the 2 Freiburg im Breisgau, urban district 40.6 Federal Institute for Population Research can be found 3 Offenbach am Main, urban district 40.7 in chapter I.4. 4 Frankfurt am Main, urban district 40.8 5 Darmstadt, urban district 40.8 14 Cologne, urban district 41.6 18 Berlin, urban district 41.8 i 21 Mansfeld-Südharz, district 42.1 The report by the Federal Institute for Population Research is part of a three-part résumé by the demo- 34 Dessau-Roßlau, urban district 42.6 graphic policy of the Federal Ministry of the Interior, 397 Greiz, district 50.2 Building and Community in the 19th legislative period. The first part consists of this report which specifically 398 Mansfeld-Südharz, district 50.2 addresses the formats and activities pursued and adopt- 399 Altenburger Land, district 50.3 ed by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and 400 Dessau-Roßlau, urban district 50.4 Community in implementing the Federal Government’s 401 Suhl, urban district 50,8 demographic strategy. The interfaces with numerous specialist topics are also addressed, in particular, the Data source: Federal Statistical Office, calculations: Federal Institute for Population Research significance of demographic change for the public ser- vice. The second, research-based part is the report by the Federal Institute for Population Research with a focus on extensive data analysis and editing as well as With regard to the details of demographic development, facts on demographic development. The Federal Insti- reference is made to the exhaustive report issued by the tute for Population Research thereby addresses the Federal Institute for Population Research that provides val- development not only in Germany, but also in a Europe- uable impulses for future policymaking based on scientific an comparison as well as in an international context. It research. emphasises selected aspects (such as migration between urban and rural spaces) against a time horizon of up to 2040. The third part finally offers the core elements of the demographic policy of the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community for the first time in digital format; more on this can be found in chapter VI and at www.demografiepolitik.de/4you/en. Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 13
2. Equivalent living conditions – Commission mandate and pillar of the demographic strategy Where do I feel comfortable? What about access to goods and services? How can I help shape the quality of life in my municipality? Can I continue to live in my familiar surroundings when I’m old? These issues were most recently addressed specifically by On the basis of the final reports drawn up by the Commis- the ‘Equivalent Living Conditions’ Commission which was sion’s six technical working groups, the Federal Minister of appointed by the Federal Cabinet on 18 July 2018. As the the Interior, Building and Community, together with his centrepiece of the Federal Government’s community policy, co-chairs, the Federal Minister of Food and Agriculture and it was expected to develop recommendations on how we the Federal Minister for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, can improve local living conditions against the background Women and Youth, drew up proposals for the further of demographic change. The guiding principle was to open development of active structural and, above all, regional up real opportunities for everyone to have access to educa- policy. The report titled ‘Unser Plan für Deutschland – tion, work, housing, prosperity, sport and infrastructure, be Gleichwertige Lebensverhältnisse überall’ (Our Plan for it in Gelsenkirchen, the Lausitz region or Hamburg. Germany – Equivalent Living Conditions Everywhere) www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publika- tionen/themen/heimat-integration/schlussfolgerun- gen-kom-gl.html was presented to the Federal Cabinet on i 10 July 2019. As one of the four pillars of the demographic strategy, the promotion of equivalent living conditions has Quote from the Cabinet decision to establish the long been a focus of the Federal Government and hence of Commission dated 18 July 2018: the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Commu nity. “On the basis of a common understanding of equivalent living conditions, the Commission aims to develop recommendations for action with a view to different “When differences in living regional developments and demographic change in conditions lead to inequality, Germany.” our policies must compensate for this.” Federal Minister of the Interior Horst Seehofer Source: www.bmi.bund.de 14 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
Fig. 9: Demographic strategy of the Federal Government (equality of living conditions) For more prosperity and quality of life for all generations Ensuring sound funding Promoting equality of for the state’s ability to Strengthening economic Promoting social and living conditions in the act and for reliable social growth potential societal cohesion regions security systems ∙ Potential for ∙ Family as a community ∙ Economic strength and ∙ Sustainability of securing skilled innovation potential of rural public finances workers at home • A society fit for young people and urban regions and abroad • Reliability of social • Self-determined life in old age • Promoting infrastructure and security systems • Good education as facilitating the adaptation of an investment in the • An inclusive society facilities of general interest • Attractive and future modern public • Civic engagement • Promoting sustainable urban service • Productivity development and inclusive through innovation • Health promotion and urban societies and investment sustainable care in the event of illness, need for care and for people with dementia Source and diagram: Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community One of the Commission’s recommendations in its conclu- i sions is to support all structurally weak regions – both rural Background to the Commission’s recommendation: and urban – throughout Germany. In this context, the joint task of ‘Improving Regional Economic Structures’ (GRW) is After German unification, regional structural policy was of particular importance due to its high funding volume of geared specifically to merging east and west. When Sol- 1.2 billion euro annually. In order to address demographic idarity Pact II expired at the end of 2019, which com- change in the context of this funding measure, a demo- bined the majority of the Federal Government’s invest- graphic component will be included in the underlying indi- ment measures in the east German states, a need for cator system. In this way, it will be possible to adequately action arose. However, structurally weak regions in west take into account future economic development and Germany are also facing economic challenges. In view employment potential in the region as well as the impor- of these two developments, the coalition partners tance of demographic change, including migration, for agreed in the coalition agreement for the 19th legisla- structural policy. On 28 October 2020, the Federal Cabinet tive period to create a new all-German assistance approved the draft law of the Federal Ministry for Econom- system for structurally weak regions. ic Affairs and Energy amending the law on the joint task of ‘Improving Regional Economic Structures’. Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 15
3. ...and beyond: challenges and opportunities in almost all areas of life, or ‘The Federal Government’s demographic strategy’ Facilitating equivalent living conditions in the regions and the associated fields of action are an important part of the Federal Government’s demographic strategy. That being said, the demographic strategy that was pre- trends. This strategy therefore identifies all fields of action sented in 2012 and updated in 2015, titled ‘Every Age that are relevant when it comes to shaping demographic Counts’ is comprehensively and actively geared towards change at a political level. exploiting the opportunities presented by population Fig. 10: Demographic policy of the Federal Government Demographic strategy ‘Every Age Counts’ Start of working Further development of group process demographic strategy Adoption of a First demography Demographic Further implementation of demographic strategy summit strategy conference the demographic strategy 1992 2009 2011 2012 2013 2015 2017 since 2018 Parliament: Demographic report Second demography Third demography establishment of a summit summit study commission Result report of the working groups Demographic policy bottom line Source and diagram: Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community 16 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
Aware of the demographic challenges, the Federal Govern- The core element of the strategy is comprehensive and ment decided in its 2009 coalition agreement to develop a ongoing dialogue with stakeholders from federal states and cross-ministerial demographic strategy by 2012. The basis local authorities, social partners, associations, business, sci- for political decision-makers was the demographic report ence and civil society who are involved in shaping this dia- presented in autumn 2011 which was the first of its kind to logue, www.demografie-portal.de/DE/Politik/Bund/Dia- comprehensively present Germany’s past and foreseeable logprozess/Dialogprozess.html. A working group process future demographic developments. According to this with many relevant stakeholders was therefore triggered on report, measures had already been taken in all important the basis of the strategy. Finally, by the end of the 18th leg- policy areas with a view to demographic change. It also islative period in 2017, ten working groups addressed all underlined the need for an overarching policy geared to areas of life and policymaking affected by demographic strategic objectives. On this basis, the Federal Government change, www.demografie-portal.de/DE/Politik/Bund/Dia- presented its demographic strategy ‘Every Age Counts’ in logprozess/Arbeitsgruppen/arbeitsgruppen.html. spring 2012, www.demografie-portal.de/DE/Service/Pub- likationen/2012/demografiestrategie-der-bundesregierung. pdf. Source: Henning Schacht Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 17
A cabinet decision of 14 January 2015 mandated the Feder- The key element of this updated demographic strategy is al Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community with the definition of four overall objectives, i,e,: the further development of the Federal Government’s demographic strategy from the previous legislative period l Strengthening economic growth potential under the heading ‘For more prosperity and quality of life for all generations’ (Für mehr Wohlstand und Lebensqual- l Promoting social cohesion ität aller Generationen) with the participation of the minis- tries. This strategy specifically fleshed out the objectives l Promoting equivalent living conditions and their connection with the strategy’s fields of action, including the results of the working groups, it outlined the l Ensuring sound funding for the state’s ability to act and progress achieved so far in shaping demographic change for reliable social security systems and presented the priority measures of the Federal Govern- ment in the 18th legislative period. Sub-objectives and fields of action were then assigned to each of these objectives in as far as these sub-objectives and fields of action require political measures in order to achieve the objectives. The four-pillar diagram below illus- trates this: Fig. 11: Demographic strategy of the Federal Government For more prosperity and quality of life for all generations Ensuring sound funding Promoting equality of for the state’s ability to Strengthening economic Promoting social and living conditions in the act and for reliable social growth potential societal cohesion regions security systems ∙ Potential for ∙ Family as a community ∙ Economic strength and ∙ Sustainability of securing skilled innovation potential of rural public finances workers at home • A society fit for young people and urban regions and abroad • Reliability of social • Self-determined life in old age • Promoting infrastructure and security systems • Good education as facilitating the adaptation of an investment in the • An inclusive society facilities of general interest • Attractive and future modern public • Civic engagement • Promoting sustainable urban service • Productivity development and inclusive through innovation • Health promotion and urban societies and investment sustainable care in the event of illness, need for care and for people with dementia Source and diagram: Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community 18 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
The fields of action and objectives are not statically www.demografie-portal.de/DE/Politik/Bund/Dialogproz- arranged side by side, but are interdependent and interact ess/Arbeitsgruppen/ergebnisbericht-arbeitsgruppen-2017. with each other. This means that changes in one or more pdf fields of action of one pillar may directly or indirectly impact topics of another pillar. It is, for instance, clear that widespread access to educational institutions and well- trained skilled workers (pillar 1) help to stabilise our social security system (pillar 4) through good opportunities on the labour market. Conversely, a decline in the number of people doing voluntary work (pillar 2) may well be an issue in certain regions in Germany where mobility services are only available to a limited extent and are replaced by pri- vate drivers, such as pensioners doing voluntary youth work. The revised demographic strategy was presented to the Source: Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community Federal Cabinet on 2 September 2015. www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publika- The implementation of the demographic strategy, together tionen/themen/heimat-integration/demografie/demografi- with partners from the federal states, municipalities, busi- estrategie-weiterentwicklung.html ness, academia and society, continues to this day. An inter- generational policy that is adapted to the respective life sit- With its Demographic Policy Assessment (Demografiepoli- uation while recognising and facilitating development tische Bilanz der Bundesregierung) as of the end of the opportunities for people of all ages at an early stage is the 18th legislative period, the Federal Government finally pre- primary means of orientation to this end. The strategy is to sented in 2017 the key trends in thirteen policy areas for a large extent implemented by the respective line minis- shaping demographic change as well as important meas- tries. For example, measures to reconcile work and family ures taken by the Federal Government during the legislative life or policy measures for senior citizens are initiated by period. the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth, and labour market policy measures by It thereby referred to the updated demographic strategy the Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. These from 2015 and the objectives defined there. The assess- ministries are also responsible for the respective legislation. ment concludes that the challenges posed by demographic The Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Commu- change will continue to increase with the expected retire- nity has special responsibility for civil service law as well as ment of the baby boomers from working life beginning in for homeland policy, urban development, housing and the mid-2020s, and that the Federal Government will building as well as for the digitalisation of the federal therefore continue to strengthen and interlink its ministeri- administration. First and foremost, however, the Federal al activities and cooperation with other stakeholders in Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community is respon- society. The results of the working groups were also pub- sible as coordinator and initiator at the interface of the lished. fields of action covered by the strategy. Where the different areas of life intersect, the ministry thus has a wide scope www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publika- for action, which it makes use of in different ways. tionen/themen/heimat-integration/demografie/demo- grafiebilanz.html Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 19
4. ‘Every Age Counts’ as a political mandate: the management aspirations of the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community As mentioned earlier, many of these areas of life are closely interlinked, so that changes in one area also affect other areas to varying degrees. The current increase in birth rate, for instance, is considered This is where the possibilities and achievements of digitali- to be not just a result of immigration, but also a direct con- sation can open doors, so that educational offers, for sequence of family policy measures, such as parental allow- instance, can also be used in remote regions in virtual for- ance and other measures to reconcile family and work, mats or telemedicine cave save having to travel to a doc- www.bib.bund.de/Publikation/2013/Wirkungen-des- tor’s office in a distant city. Proactive demographic policy Elterngelds-auf-Einkommen-und-Fertilitaet.html. And must address all these issues. where there are more offers for preventive health care exist and where there is a more employee-friendly working envi- To this end, the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building ronment, we are likely to find higher numbers of skilled and Community has continued and intensified tried-and- workers. Most recently and even today, the events sur- tested forms of cooperation at the interface with the poli- rounding the Covid-19 pandemic have clearly shown us cies of the different ministries in the 19th legislative period how great these dependencies are. An interconnected polit- and has at the same time developed and implemented new ical approach that includes all areas of life is the only way formats. What all formats have in common is that they to overcome this as well as future crises. Chapter V pro- enable and promote a high degree of communication and/ vides more details. or networking with and between a large number of stake- holders. Moreover, the expansion of the responsibilities of All in all, the developments described in chapter I – regard- the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Communi- less of whether they are significant or only just beginning ty to include the topics of homeland, equivalent living con- to materialise – must be seen to be positive from a demo- ditions, urban development as well as building and housing graphic perspective. Increasingly high life expectancy repre- – beyond the ministry’s previous responsibility for public sents enormous potential: for each individual, but also for service employment law – has opened up further possibili- the economy and society of a country and hence for its ties for the ministry when it comes to implementing the prosperity. But one should not forget that the existence and demographic strategy. Every effort should be made to availability of infrastructures alone are not enough to main- ensure the ongoing exploitation of these possibilities in tain and strengthen our economic power and prosperity on cooperation with the stakeholders mentioned in the strate- the one hand and social cohesion on the other. A more gy: At Federal Government level with the Federal Chancel- comprehensive perspective is needed instead. The only way lery and the ministries, as well as with the federal states to create real opportunities and conditions for participation and their demography commissioners, as model projects in in society exist if each and every individual has access to cooperation with districts and municipalities directly on and can use technical and social – especially education – site, and also with representatives from academia and infrastructures. research as well as from civil society. 20 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
The implementation measures in this context primarily respect. This facilitates and strengthens communications serve the following four objectives: between the Federal Institute for Population Research and the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Communi- l Enabling a broad transfer of knowledge from science to ty as well as with other federal ministries and political politics stakeholders in Berlin. l Initiating the exchange of experience with practitioners on site i Further details on the Federal Institute for Population l Creating a European demographic policy network Research, in particular, on the individual research areas, can be found at: www.bib.bund.de. l Strengthening international cooperation platforms Broad transfer of knowledge from science to politics Demographic policy, just like policy in general, should not be based solely on personal perception, perceived trends or anecdotal narratives. Instead, demographic policy should be evidence-based. This means that all decisions and meas- ures to manage demographic change should be based on facts, figures and the results of science and research. Suita- ble instruments to this end include, for instance, conduct- ing population studies, evaluating population structure data, exchanging information on scenarios, learning from comparisons, clarifying basic mechanisms of the interaction of population and social processes, and evaluating the Source: Isabel Pavia/Moment/Getty Images impact of political measures and programmes. This is the only way to communicate these measures to a broad popu- lation who will then accept and support them. The Federal Government has been investing in basic research in population science for decades. More than 60 experts at the Federal Institute for Population Research in Wiesbaden are currently working on various research topics in the fields of fertility, mortality and migration in order to provide the public with up-to-date facts and trends on demographic development. The Federal Institute for Popu- lation Research also collects its own data and engages in national and international exchange with scientific partners. At the same time, the institute comprehensively advises the Federal Government and the federal states on research topics. The Federal Government not only invests in basic research, but also in policy advice. The opening of the insti- tute’s Berlin office in 2018 was an important step in this Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 21
i Informed administrative action is the only way to generate FReDA – The Lighthouse Project comprehensible and credible results. Consequently, staff of the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Communi- The most important step towards securing demographic ty, whose work is related to the topic of demography, are research, both by the Federal Institute for Population also to be informed in various events about current Research and by academic research in Germany as a research topics of the Federal Institute for Population whole, is the promotion of the FReDA data infrastruc- Research. ture – the family demographic panel. FReDA stands for ‘Family Research and Demographic Analysis’. Under the auspices of the Federal Institute for Population Research, FReDA will conduct a survey programme Exchanging experience with practitioners on site starting in 2021 where a large representative sample of persons aged between 18 and 49 and resident in Ger- Demographic policy should not only consider facts and fig- many will be surveyed every six months on a wide range ures, but also have a realistic picture of the living environ- of family demographic topics, such as the wish to have ment of the people in mind. It is also important to consider children, compatibility problems, the relationship with the experience of the stakeholders who, on the one hand, one’s own parents and the use of reproductive medicine. face the challenges of change every day and also imple- The questionnaires include ‘open modules’ that will ment political measures on the other. Demographic change enable all researchers in Germany to contribute their is taking place on the ground in the municipalities. This is own questions in order to address their specific research where the impact on the population is being directly felt, interests. The data collected will be made available to and where new concepts and approaches to solutions to the scientific community without undue delay. guarantee the provision of public services and secure the The Federal Institute for Population Research will also quality of life have been developed over a number of years. provide regular and timely information directly to It is not always possible to present to federal policymakers policymakers regarding the most important results from the knowledge gained and pre-existing solutions from one FReDA. FReDA fills an important gap left following region of Germany or to pass them on to another region. expiration of the Generations and Gender Survey (GGS) The Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Commu- and pairfam (Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships nity therefore considers itself to be particularly called upon and Family Dynamics) survey programmes, thereby to act as a kind of demographic pilot at the interface of all securing the basis for demographic research in Germany demographic issues and to interconnect people and pro- beyond 2021. jects. The Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Commu- European demographic policy network nity is particularly committed to passing on in several for- mats the knowledge gained specifically through the Demographic change is transforming not only Germany, research and advice provided by the Federal Institute for but all member states of the European Union, albeit not Population Research. The focus is on dialogue between always in the same way or at the same pace. All Member practitioners and academia, which for its part can learn to States will see their population ageing in the coming dec- translate laboratory results into reality through meetings ades, and many member states will also be confronted with with stakeholder groups and through coordination a shrinking population. Both within the European Union processes. and within the member states themselves, considerable regional differences sometimes already exist in the areas of population development, children and family, internal and 22 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
external migration, ageing and social systems, the economy ning issues. The Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and the labour market as well as education. It is to be and Community believes that much can be achieved by expected that some of these differences will even intensify exchanging experience across national borders and, if pos- in the future. While scientists and researchers are very well sible, creating synergies. Where common positions are interconnected throughout Europe, any exchange on issues found, these can also be asserted more forcefully in relation of demographic change at EU-wide political level has been to international partners. The aim is hence to create a Euro- limited to specific individual aspects, such as regional plan- pean demographic policy network. Fig. 12: EU Member States and their population in millions (as of 2020) Country code: (AT) Austria (BE) Belgium (BG) Bulgaria (CY) Cyprus (CZ) Czech Republic FI (DE) Germany 5.5 (DK) Denmark (EE) Estonia SE (ES) Spain 10.3 (FI) Finland (FR) France (EL) Greece EE (HR) Croatia 1.3 (HU) Hungary LV (IE) Ireland 1.9 (IT) Italy (LT) Lithuania DK LT (LU) Luxembourg 5.8 2.8 (LV) Latvia IE (MT) Malta 5.0 (NL) Netherlands (PL) Poland NL PL (PT) Portugal 17.4 38.0 (RO) Romania DE (SE) Sweden BE 83.2 (SI) Slovenia 11.5 LU CZ 10.7 SK (SK) Slovakia 0.6 5.5 AT HU FR 8.9 9.8 RO 67.1 HR 19.3 IT SI 4.1 60.2 2.1 BG 7.0 PT ES 10.3 47.3 EL 10.7 CY 0.9 MT 0.5 Source: EUROSTAT, map: Federal Institute for Population Research Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 23
Strengthening international cooperation platforms tion and are trying out new ways of managing this develop- ment. Here it is important to exchange experience and Demographic developments in countries outside the EU learn from each other. In many African countries, on the can have a direct and indirect impact on EU countries, for other hand, there are many more young people than old, example, when it comes to migration flows. Past experience and ways are being explored to harness the so-called shows that migration out of non-European countries can demographic dividend for economic development. Germa- become inbound migration to the European continent, with ny can actively contribute its experience with demogra- implications for population size and composition in the phy-orientated policy design to the international debate. In respective countries. Demographic trends in countries out- light of the interactions between demographic develop- side Europe are generally diverse: Whilst the population ments within and outside the EU, the Federal Ministry of continues to rise in many African countries, more and more the Interior, Building and Community sees it as its duty to countries are seeing stagnant or declining population num- strengthen the international dimension of German demo- bers. Like Germany, Asian countries, such as Japan, Singa- graphic policy and to clearly identify references to Germa- pore and Thailand, face the challenges of an ageing popula- ny. Fig. 13: Continents according to current population development Population 2020 Population growth 2020 1 billion 500 million 100 million High Moderate No inhabitants inhabitants inhabitants growth growth growth Data source: UN, calculations and diagram: Federal Institute for Population Research 24 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
Fig. 14: Migration between and within world regions in the period from 2010 to 2015* * Data are only available in 5-year periods. Data for the 2015 to 2020 period will be available in 2021/2022. Data source: Abel, Guy J. “Estimates of global bilateral migration flows by gender between 1960 and 2015.” International Migration Rewiew 52.3 (2018): 809-852, diagram: Federal Institute for Population Research With a view to the four objectives described earlier, the i Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community Migration processes between the world regions are has developed appropriate formats to implement the Fed- mapped. The colour indicates the direction, the width eral Government’s demographic strategy. These formats are their size. Example: Between 2010 and 2015, around hence taking place at national (federal, federal-state and 1.1 million people migrated from south Asia to Europe, municipal) level and in the European framework as well as and another 3 million to west Asia. at international level. Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 25
II. A cross-cutting view of demography – examples of national implementation 26 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
Source: Westend61/Getty Images Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 27
1. Together on site in the dialogue on demo- graphy: municipality – federal state – Federal Government The Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community as a demographic pilot – this is the idea already mentioned earlier that underlies the format of demographic dialogue. After the working group process in the last legislative expert forum to make their experiences and knowledge vis- period was completed, cooperation with the design part- ible and to exchange them directly with each other. ners, i.e. the representatives of all levels of government, the economy, the social partners, academia and civil society, What helps and what hinders the implementation of new had to be continued in a suitable form, as announced in the concepts? Where do regulations and standards need to be Federal Government’s Demographic Policy Assessment at more flexible? How can successful cooperation between the end of the 18th legislative period. Shortly after that, the municipalities be organised? This wealth of knowledge and idea of holding demographic dialogue with a focus on experience must be leveraged and made visible. That is why ‘Strengthening regions – reducing disparities’ emerged. it is mainly the practitioners who have their say, learning from each other, sharing knowledge and passing on experi- This dialogue was implemented in workshops that were ences. Insight will be gained how the respective topics and held locally in individual events took place locally in the fields of action should be rethought and implemented in federal states and/or regions and supported by the federal view of demographic development, how the framework for states and/or other design partners. The aim was to address stakeholders in the municipalities must be designed in light the topics on a broader and up-to-date basis, so that indi- of demographic change, and how standards and norms vidual aspects could be addressed in greater depth in the must be adapted in order to enable new, alternative respective workshops. Another aim was to incorporate approaches to solutions that will guarantee services of gen- more practical examples into the implementation of the eral interest and secure the quality of life. The results will demographic strategy and to involve the design partners in be made available to other federal states and municipalities this dialogue process. and, if necessary, a need for action will be identified for the Federal Government and the federal states. The series of events which has been rolled out across sev- eral regions of Germany addresses the challenges and In its capacity as demographic pilot, the Federal Ministry of opportunities of demographic development in our demo- the Interior, Building and Community has special tasks in graphically heterogeneous country. Participants and this regard: The first one being to contribute existing addressees of the individual one-day events are always the knowledge, i.e. demographic data and facts, relevant for the local stakeholders, i.e. representatives of the district, specific region. The second task is to involve subject matter mayors, representatives of professional associations, if rele- experts who can share their knowledge of action concepts vant, of the Chamber of Industry and Commerce, of senior as well as best practice information and, if applicable, exist- citizens and similar organisations who are shaping demo- ing support programmes with local stakeholders. Where graphic change at local level. The dialogue offers them an possible and appropriate, these can be project managers 28 A Cross-cutting View of Demographic Policy
from municipalities facing comparable challenges, but also facing comparable challenges, very much in the tradition of colleagues from federal and federal state ministries respon- the twinning idea. In this way, solution concepts can be dis- sible in charge of the respective topic. What’s special about cussed in detail and directly tested with a view to transfera- this format is that not only the region hosting the dialogue bility and practicability. This approach ultimately integrates is looked at, but that the Federal Ministry of the Interior, all social stakeholders who actively shape demographic Building and Community – where possible and appropriate change locally, enabling them to pass on their knowledge – also introduces potential contacts, such as representa- and experience and encourage other stakeholders to also tives of the district administration and from municipalities break new ground. Experience from Cham and Stendal Up to now, two of the four demographic dialogues planned for this legislative period have already taken place: Demographic Dialogue ‘South’ in Cham 2018 (Bavaria) On 4 December 2018, representatives of the region met with stakeholders from the federal government and from Bavaria, Brandenburg and Lower Saxony in Cham, Upper Palatinate. Using the example of the Cham district, they discussed mobility in rural areas and formulated concrete approaches for action. The results were published in a bro- chure, www.demografie-portal.de/DE/Service/Publika- tionen/2019/erster-demografiedialog-mobilitaet-in-laend- lichen-raeumen.html. A first impression of the region can be found in the opening film for the dialogue event: https://youtu.be/Cso9wJhzDW4. Source: Benjamin Franz Résumé by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community at the end of the 19th legislative period 29
You can also read