What do Young Employees Dream of? Quality of Work, Career Aspirations and Desire for Mobility Among the Under 30s - Insee

Page created by Kevin Matthews
 
CONTINUE READING
What do Young Employees Dream of? Quality of
                                                                                                             Work, Career Aspirations and Desire for Mobility
                                                                                                             Among the Under 30s

                                                                                                             Christine Fournier*, Marion Lambert* and Isabelle Marion‑Vernoux*

                                                                                                             Abstract – The career aspirations of young employees, recorded via the Defis system (Dispositif
                                                                                                             d’enquêtes sur les formations et les itinéraires des salariés, a set of surveys on training and
                                                                                                             employee trajectory), by no means fit one single model. On the one hand, they are guided by
                                                                                                             a career‑trajectory plan or a plan to find a job that best suits their skills and training. On the
                                                                                                             other hand, however, they reflect a desire for looser professional constraints to provide a better
                                                                                                             work‑life balance or a desire for a more relaxed relationship of subordination allowing employees
                                                                                                             to gain greater autonomy. Terms of employment remain a major factor in the aspirations of
                                                                                                             young employees, although they do not paint the whole picture. The plans formulated by young
                                                                                                             employees when entering working life are largely determined by their assessment of the quality
                                                                                                             of the work performed, both from the perspective of its actual performance and in terms of the
                                                                                                             links it gives to networks outside of work.

                                                                                                             JEL Classification: J21, J28, J62, M54
                                                                                                             Keywords: aspirations, young, employee, employment, work
Reminder: The opinions and analyses in this article are those of the author(s) and do not
necessarily reflect their institution’s or Insee’s views.

                                                                                            * Céreq (christine.fournier@cereq.fr; marion.lambert@cereq.fr; isabelle.marion@cereq.fr)
                                                                                            The authors would like to thank two anonymous contributors for their insightful critiques and constructive suggestions.
                                                                                            Received on 04 October 2018, accepted after revisions on 20 September 2019.
                                                                                            Translated from: À quoi rêvent les jeunes salariés ? Qualité du travail, aspirations professionnelles et souhaits de mobilité des moins de 30 ans
                                                                                            Citation: Fournier, C., Lambert, M. & Marion‑Vernoux, I. (2020). What do Young Employees Dream of? Quality of Work, Career Aspirations and a Desire for Mobility Among
                                                                                            the Under 30s. Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, 514‑515‑516, 113–131. https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2020.514t.2007

ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514‑515‑516, 2020                                                                                                                                                                                        113
T    he first few years of professional life have,
           for several decades, been seen as a period
      of transition. During this period, young people
                                                             By extending these studies, we are looking
                                                             to highlight the aspirations of young people
                                                             in connection with their own assessment of
      are thought to be looking for ways to progress         the quality of their work. We are interested in
      towards the professional situation promised            employees under the age of 301, using the Defis
      by their degree, where they have not achieved          survey system in 2015 (Box 1). The scope of the
      this upon entering the job market, a minority          study brings together employees under the age of
      situation that often heralds later professional        30 from companies with ten or more employees
      mobility. This normative view is, however, the         in December 2013 and having been in employ­
      subject of discussion. Maria Eugenia Longo             ment for the 18 months that followed that date
      emphasises that: “The […] risk is ‘ideological         (N=2,885). In the first section, we characterise
      valuation’, i.e. normatively appraising transi‑        the jobs that these employees hold and give an
      tions solely on the basis of criteria regarding        overview of their assessments of their jobs and
      salaried employment. With the new biographical         their aspirations. In the second section, we aim
      timescales, careers are no longer characterised        to relate these assessments to their career aspira­
      solely by the terms traditionally used to describe     tions, so as to highlight the decisive nature of
      them: inclusion, exclusion, stabilisation, success,    work quality. For the third section, we propose
      failure or advancement” (Longo, 2011, p. 15).          classifying the aspirations of young employees
      Leaving the education system with differing            so as to identify five career plan models.
      levels of qualification, young people have very
      contrasting journeys on the job market in terms
      of the time at which they access employment,           1. Some Descriptive Elements
      the total time spent in unemployment, working          on Employment, Work and
      time and pay, all of which are regularly identi­
                                                             Aspirations of Young Employees
      fied by various studies on entry onto the job
      market (Céreq, 2017, 2018). These studies,
                                                             Before approaching the question of links
      which also examine developments at early career
                                                             between the quality of work of young people
      stages, show that young people are a lot more
                                                             and their aspirations, which is at the core of
      mobile than their elders. According to those
                                                             our objective, we will briefly characterise our
      studies, mobility at early career stages follows
                                                             population in terms of educational attainment
      two trends: internal mobility, which specifically
                                                             and socio‑professional categories, job satisfac­
      concerns the most academically qualified young
                                                             tion and aspirations.
      people, who take development opportunities
      open to them within the companies that employ
      them; and external ability, which relates to the       1.1. Education and Socio‑Professional Job
      less academically qualified, who follow more           Categories
      tumultuous career paths (Dupray, 2005; Dupray
      & Recotillet, 2009).                                   As a result of the democratisation of higher
                                                             education, stimulated in 1985 in line with the
      Portela & Signoretto (2017) bring new elements         objective of “80% Baccalaureate pass rate among
      to the debate by analysing the “voluntary”             any given generation”, a very large number of
      mobility of young people with permanent                today’s young employees have qualifications
      employment contracts who choose to resign.             at least equal to the Baccalaureate (Beaud,
      The data collected by the Génération 98 survey         2002). Among employees under the age of 30,
      over ten years show that young people are most         7% have no qualifications, 19% have a CAP or
      likely to voluntarily leave a permanent job due to     BEP (vocational qualifications), 23% have the
      a desire for better pay, greater autonomy or more      Baccalaureate and 51% have a higher education
      recognition of their work. At the heart of this        degree (Table 1). The qualification profiles of
      approach, which is rich in useful lessons, lies the    young people are therefore very unequal in terms
      authors “hypothesis that it is past characteristics    of the opportunities offered by the job market,
      of jobs, specifically career aspirations such as       as attested by the numerous studies conducted
      job satisfaction, that explain mobility‑related        regarding employment of those entering into
      choices” (Portela & Signoretto, 2017, p. 252).         working life (Céreq, 2017, 2018).
      They conclude that “it is therefore prudent to
      extend this study to take into account the working
      conditions experienced by employees and the            1. The cut‑off of 30 years of age was chosen in view of the recent studies
                                                             carried out on professional integration that report a longer process (Céreq,
      work organisation put in place by companies,           2018; Castera & Gougain, 2019). The term “employee” here refers to a per‑
      alongside strict employment terms” (p. 273).           son employed in the private sector.

114                                                    ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020
What do Young Employees Dream of? Quality of Work, Career Aspirations and Desire for Mobility

             Box 1 – The Defis system

             Invited to explore the links between continuous training            (five one‑year waves). The samples are taken on the
             and career paths, Céreq, the French Centre for Studies              basis of a two‑level sampling design. The sample of com‑
             and Research on Qualifications designed an original sys‑            panies is taken from the SIRENE file and the sample of
             tem, the Dispositif d’enquêtes sur les formations et les            “employees” from the Déclarations Annuelles de Données
             itinéraires des salariés (training and employee trajectory          Sociales (annual social data declarations, DADS).
             surveys, Defis). Initiated by the National Council for the
             Evaluation of Professional Training and financed by the             The weighting of the first wave of the “employees” part of
             Joint Fund for the Safeguarding of Career Paths (now                the Defis has three stages:
             France compétences), this system, designed by Céreq,                • a double inference, the aim of which is to take into
             establishes the link between the training activities fol‑           account the probabilities that employees (secondary
             lowed by employees in the private sector and their career           units) respond to the survey and are drawn in the sample ;
             paths. 16,000 employees in the private sector responded
             to the first wave of the system in 2015 and were then               • the weighting of the companies who employ the
             interviewed annually over four years, until 2019.                   employees who respond to the survey (primary units) ;
                                                                                 • a final calibration of the DADS data.
             The companies that employed these people in December
             2013 were surveyed in 2015 in order to collect detailed             The sub‑sample defined for our analysis consists of
             information on the context in which the employees found             employees under the age of 30, who were employed
             themselves when they were first interviewed. 4,500 com‑             in companies with ten or more employees in December
             panies, representative of the private sector, were inter‑           2013 and had been in employment for the 18 months that
             viewed as part of this “companies” part of the system.              followed that date. The first wave includes 2,885 indivi‑
                                                                                 duals (of a total of 16,000 employees who responded)
             The “paired survey” system is formed of two parts, a                representing, after weighting, 2,483,000 employees
             “companies” part and a sample‑based “employees” part                under the age of 30.

                       Table 1 – Educational attainment and socio‑professional categories of young employees
                                                                               Workforce (in thousands)                 Proportion (%)
            Total                                                                            2,483                                100
            Basic education
                                                             Unqualified                       173                                  7
                                                               CAP/BEP                         479                                 19
                                                          Baccalaureate                        571                                 23
                                             2 years of higher education                       445                                 18
                                        3 or 4 years of higher education                       355                                 14
                                    5 or more years of higher education                        460                                 19
            Socio‑professional category
                                               Unskilled manual worker                         239                                 10
                                                 Skilled manual worker                         515                                 21
                                       Unskilled white‑collar employee*                        458                                 18
                                         Skilled white‑collar employee                         553                                 22
                                                  Technician/supervisor                        432                                 17
                                                    Executive engineer                         285                                 12
           * The “unskilled” white‑collar employee category has been defined on the basis of Estrade (2008).
           Reading note: 7% of individuals under the age of 30, who were in employment in December 2013, had no qualifications.
           Sources and Coverage: Cnefp‑Céreq, Defis 2015. Employees under the age of 30 from companies with ten or more employees in December 2013
           who had been in employment for the 18 months that followed that date (N=2,885).

           Access to the Baccalaureate for the majority                          young graduates (Maurin, 2010; Duru‑Bellat,
           of a generation and the democratisation of                            2006; Giret, 2005). For example, only one
           higher education were not achieved without                            young graduate in ten has an executive‑level
           problems. A number of studies talk of “down­                          job. 17% are technicians or supervisors, 43%
           grading”, which would be affecting today’s                            are skilled white‑collar employees or manual

ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020                                                                              115
workers, and 28% are unskilled white‑collar                                   assume that it is in fact the link between the two
      employees or manual workers. While anyone                                     that is of interest: young employees working
      taking their first steps in employment must                                   in a socio‑professional category that does not
      accept their little or even lack of professional                              match what they could have hoped for on the
      experience, the plethora of graduates, particu­                               basis of their degree are more often unsatisfied
      larly in some specialties, is also a cause of                                 with their professional situation. For example,
      sometimes unsatisfactory work placements. An                                  among graduates with five years of higher
      examination of the socio‑professional catego­                                 education, nine in ten of those in executive‑
      ries of young employees as compared to their                                  level positions report that they are satisfied,
      levels of educational attainment suggests that                                compared with seven in ten of those in adminis­
      some career plans will reflect aspirations in line                            trative positions.
      with the opportunities available on the basis of
      educational qualifications.                                                   Almost nine in ten young employees report
                                                                                    that they “find their work interesting”. This
                                                                                    proportion varies between 80% (white‑collar
      1.2. A Large Majority of Professional                                         employees, whether skilled or not) and 96%
      Situations Deemed to be “Generally                                            (technicians, engineers and executives). In
      Satisfactory” Despite the Difficulties                                        terms of the link between the level of educa­
      Encountered                                                                   tional attainment and reporting an interesting
                                                                                    job, there are some, relatively minor, deviations:
      On the whole, young employees report that                                     88% of graduates with two years of higher
      they are relatively satisfied with their job, with                            education and 93% of those with five years of
      seven in ten judging their professional situation                             higher education find their work interesting,
      to be “generally satisfactory” (Table 2). We can                              compared with 84% of other young employees,
      hypothesise that some of them have accepted                                   whatever their level of educational attainment.
      the idea that they will have a journey ahead of                               Two of the responses proposed suggest a rela­
      them to reach the situation seemingly promised                                tive dissatisfaction associated with use of skills
      to them by their educational qualifications.                                  and remuneration: only six in ten employees
                                                                                    report that they make full use of their skills in
      Two of the categories of young people deviate                                 their work and less than half believe they are
      significantly from this average: engineers and                                sufficiently paid for the work they perform.
      executives (87%) and white‑collar employees                                   These assessments of the employees in terms
      (60%). The same applies in the case of gradu­                                 of their satisfaction at work appear related to
      ates with five years of higher education (82%)                                the difficulties they report encountering at work.
      and non‑graduates (64%). However, beyond
      the level of educational attainment or socio‑                                 Time management (work‑life balance, staggered
      professional category as separate aspects, we                                 hours, requirement to rush, working more than

                      Table 2 – Young people’s assessments of their work and the difficulties encountered

                                                                                  Workforce (in thousands)                     Proportion (%)
       Are generally satisfied with their professional situation                                  1,773                               71
       Find their work interesting                                                                2,151                               87
       Work matches qualifications                                                                1,724                               69
       Are not bored                                                                              2,083                               84
       Use all their skills in their work                                                         1,461                               59
       Are paid enough given the work performed                                                   1,183                               48
       Have difficulties in balancing personal and professional life                                692                               28
       Are required to rush                                                                       1,383                               56
       Work more than 45 hours/week                                                                 526                               21
       Work staggered hours                                                                       1,405                               57
       Find their work physically exhausting                                                        967                               39
      Reading note: 59% of individuals under the age of 30, who were in employment in December 2013, say they use all their skills in performing their work.
      Sources and Coverage: Cnefp‑Céreq, Defis 2015. Employees under the age of 30 from companies with ten or more employees in December 2013
      who had been in employment for the 18 months that followed that date (N=2,885).

116                                                                        ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020
What do Young Employees Dream of? Quality of Work, Career Aspirations and Desire for Mobility

           45 hours) is a major factor contributing to             the type of job also leaves its mark on the aspira­
           dissatisfaction. Four young people in ten find          tions formulated by young employees. While on
           their “work arduous”. The requirement “to               average 59% plan to leave for another company
           rush” is reported by 56% of those surveyed, and         and/or access other employment, this number
           “staggered hours” by 57%. One in five young             is at 73% for unskilled white‑collar employees.
           people reports that they work over 45 hours per         This wish is particularly prevalent among young
           week, and 28% that their work‑life balance is           women (66%, compared with 54% of men),
           a problem (30% of young women and 26% of                owing to the characteristics of female employ­
           young men). Similarly, 36% of young people              ment, which is largely focused on the category
           reporting staggered hours also state that they          of unskilled white‑collar employees and has
           have difficulties in balancing their professional       a higher prevalence of part‑time employment
           and personal life (17% among others) as do 47%          (Bel, 2008). 2
           of those young people reporting that they work
           over 45 hours per week (23% among others).              While these initial results highlight the fact
           Time management is therefore a major element            that individual characteristics and terms of
           at the core of young people’s professional              employment affect the expression and nature
           aspirations.                                            of career aspirations, these dimensions are
                                                                   by no means representative of all the career
                                                                   aspirations of young employees. At the very
           1.3. Contrasted Career Aspirations                      start of the 2000s, an iconic study carried out
           Depending on Characteristics                            by Baudelot & Gollac (2003) showed that, in
           of Young People                                         addition to employment terms that are presumed
                                                                   to be satisfactory (permanent contract, full‑time
           We now look at the career aspirations of young          work, decent remuneration), working conditions
           employees. 94% of them report having “a career          (intensity, arduousness, sense of unfairness,
           plan for the next five years”. More specifically,       etc.) also constitute a major factor in whether
           for the question “what are your professional            a person has a “happy or unhappy relationship
           development aspirations for the next five               with their professional activity”. This idea was
           years?”, the survey asks the young employees            backed up in 2009 by the Employment Policy
           to give their view on each of the six following         Council (COE), which highlighted that: “Among
           proposals: to find another employment or change         the expectations of employees looking for
           company; to change profession or trade; to create       professional mobility, better remuneration is the
           their own business; to take on more responsi­           primary motivation. Interest in a new position
           bility; to develop the content of their work; to        and in better working conditions come second
           give more time for their personal life.                 and third.” (COE, 2009, p. 54). More recently,
                                                                   Guillaneuf examined the motivations given by
           The range of aspirations given by the young             employees wanting to change employment.
           people highlights major differences depending           While 23% of them were targeting an increase
           on the individual profiles (Table 3). The aspi­         in remuneration and 19% more stable employ­
           rations most frequently put forward are “To             ment, 16% wanted a more interesting job and
           develop the content of your work” (79%)                 27% improved working conditions (data from
           and “To take on more responsibility” (73%).             the Labour Force survey, Guillaneuf, 2018).
           However, these aspirations are even more                These findings show that quality of work and
           prevalent among young people with a high                quality of the job are both equally central to
           level of educational attainment or who hold a           the career plans of the working population.
           more skilled job: among young people with at            Although Guillaneuf’s study focuses on the
           least five years of higher education, 89% want          entire working population and not solely on
           to develop the content of their work and 84%            employees under 30, and despite the fact that
           want to take on more responsibility. In the             the results vary depending on employment
           case of engineers and executives, these figures         situations (those with the most beneficial
           are 89% and 83%, respectively. The business             terms of employment place greater emphasis
           context also plays a decisive role. For example,        on the work), it does stress the importance of
           the tendency to report the desire “to give more         quality of work in terms of individual aspira­
           time for personal life” drops as the size of the        tions. The study by Portela & Signoretto (2017)
           company increases, falling gradually from
           58% for employees in companies with 10 to
                                                                   2. This finding echoes that made by Charles Raffin who highlights the fact
           19 employees to 44% for those working in a              that, for full‑time employees, weekly working hours are longer in VSEs than
           company with over 1,000 employees.2 Lastly,             in other companies (Raffin, 2019).

ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020                                                                          117
Table 3 – Professional development aspirations of young people depending on their individual
                                            and employment characteristics (%)

                                                                         Proportion of young employees expressing a desire to...
                                                            Find other
                                                                            Change        Create       Take on      Develop the       Give more
                                                           employment
                                                                            trade or     their own    more res‑      content of     time for their
                                                            or change
                                                                           profession    business     ponsibility    their work     personal life
                                                            company
       Total                                                    59             43           24            73             79              49
       Among women                                              66             48           19            71             78              51
       Among men                                                54             39           28            75             79              48
       Among those with
                                     No qualifications          60             52           27            63             69              51
                                            CAP/BEP             61             39           25            71             74              48
                                       Baccalaureate            59             49           22            71             72              43
                          2 years of higher education           58             42           24            68             82              51
                     3 or 4 years of higher education           59             42           29            76             83              55
                 5 or more years of higher education            57             38           21            84             89              52
       Among young people on permanent
       contracts                                                58             43           24            75             80              53
       Among young people working part‑time                     70             59           25            53             59              41

       Among young people having worked at their
       company for…
                             Less than one year                 66             45           30            70             73              45
                                  1 to < 2 years                61             43           23            72             76              47
                                  2 to < 4 years                52             41           23            77             86              52
                                4 or more years                 55             42           20            75             82              55

       Among young people who are...
                        Unskilled manual workers                63             49           27            64             67              50
                           Skilled manual workers               46             33           28            72             77              44
                Unskilled white‑collar employees                73             58           25            71             73              50
                   Skilled white‑collar employees               61             46           21            73             78              49
                       Technicians or supervisors               55             34           25            74             85              54
                             Executive engineers                57             39           20            83             89              52
       Among young people working
       in a company with...
                              10 to 19 employees                61             43           34            75             77              58
                              20 to 49 employees                56             34           24            62             71              56
                             50 to 249 employees                62             43           27            75             81              50
                            250 to 499 employees                71             52           25            71             74              48
                            500 to 999 employees                58             52           32            82             86              47
                               1,000+ employees                 55             43           18            76             82              44
      Reading note: 59% of young employees report that they want to find other employment or change company over the course of the next five years.
      Sources and Coverage: Cnefp‑Céreq, Defis 2015. Employees under the age of 30 from companies with ten or more employees in December 2013
      who had been in employment for the 18 months that followed that date (N=2,885).

      also attests to this: following an analysis on                           2. Modelling Career Change Aspirations
      voluntary resignations by young people on
      permanent contracts, they highlight the impor­                           In order to now analyse the factors that play
      tance of “autonomy” and “recognition of work”,                           a determining role in the various plans made
      in addition to remuneration.                                             by employees, we hypothesise that, beyond the

118                                                                    ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020
What do Young Employees Dream of? Quality of Work, Career Aspirations and Desire for Mobility

           characteristics of the employee and the job they                give structure to an expectation. For example,
           hold, quality of the work also plays a decisive                 believing that you “have opportunities for
           role in the development and expression of a                     progression”, or “for increased remuneration”
           career plan. The probability of expressing each                 or that you “are not at risk of losing your job”
           of the six career development aspirations is                    are all factors that facilitate, or even empower,
           modelled in order to highlight the influence of                 the development and expression of a career plan.
           terms of employment (status, type of contract,                  We have therefore introduced the dimension of
           full/part‑time, length of service) and the quality              “confidence in the future” as a control variable;
           of the work, while taking account of the indi­                  this dimension corresponds to the picture given
           vidual characteristics of the young employees                   by each employee, via the statements they make,
           (gender, educational attainment) and the                        of how they perceive their likely future. Box 2
           characteristics of the companies that employ                    presents the models and the estimation results
           them (size and business sector).                                are presented in Table 4.

           While the notion of a “plan” is in widespread
           use, it is also highly disputed (Coquelle, 1994;                2.1. Terms of Employment Influencing
           Béret, 2002; Guillaume, 2009). In this paper,                   Expression of Career Change Aspirations
           we will define an expressed career plan, i.e.
           what a person plans given the elements at their                 Most studies on the initial years of working life
           disposal, as involving a formulation or vision of               are generally based on two principles. The first
           actions to be carried out in a concrete manner.                 posits that young people are “integrated” once
           The plan is built on the basis of current and                   they have a “stable” job, i.e. a full‑time perma­
           expected conditions (both working conditions                    nent contract or in the civil service; the second
           and terms of employment). The formulation of                    is that all young people are looking to progress
           a plan therefore presupposes the availability of                professionally, by moving up the job ladder in
           the means and terms required for that formula­                  terms of qualification and remuneration. This
           tion, i.e. the existence of elements (objective                 model, driven by the economic performance of
           and subjective) that form the foundation of and                 the “Trente Glorieuses” (the 30 years of strong

            Box 2 – Estimation of the probability of wanting a professional change

            We estimate a series of six logistic regressions where         For each yij, we adopt the following specification:
            each professional aspiration yij is explained using
            variables relating to the characteristics of the employ‑       yij = α CarEmplij + β QualTravij + δ ConfAveij + λ CaractEntij
                                                                                  + σ Caractindij + εij
            ment (CarEmplij) and the quality of the work (QualTravij)
            as well as control variables associated with the cha‑          ‑ The variables used to characterise the terms of employ‑
            racteristics of the company and the employees (socio‑          ment (CarEmplij) are the employment contract, working
            demographic characteristics and confidence in the future).     hours, length of service and socio‑professional category.
                                                                           ‑ The variables used to characterise the quality of work
            Where yij represents the chance that an employee i             (QualTravij) are, on the one hand, the subjective qua‑
            expresses their plan j (compared with not expressing it),      lity of work (believing their work is interesting, matches
            with j from 1 to 6 :                                           their qualifications, is sufficiently paid, arduous, makes
                                                                           it difficult to balance personal and professional life) and,
            yi1: expresses the desire “to find other employment or         on the other hand, the working conditions described by
            change company” ;                                              three composite indicators (see Box 3): the composite
                                                                           indicator of opportunity for personal development, the
            yi2: expresses the desire “to change trade or profession” ;    composite indicator of intensity of work and the compo‑
                                                                           site indicator of freedom to discuss work.
            yi3: expresses the desire “to create their own business” ;
                                                                           ‑ The variables used to characterise confidence in the
            yi4: expresses the desire “to take on more responsibility” ;   future (ConfAveij) are believing that they have chances
                                                                           of promotion, increased salary and keeping their job.
            yi5: expresses the desire “to develop the content of their     ‑ The control variables characterising the employees
            work” ;                                                        and the companies in which they work are: for compa­
                                                                           nies (CaractEntij), size and business sector and, for
            yi6: expresses the desire “to give more time for their         employees (Caractindij) age, level of educational attain‑
            personal life”.                                                ment and gender.

ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020                                                                      119
Table 4 – Estimation of probability of wanting a professional change (estimated parameters – Logit)
                                                         yi1                yi2              yi3              yi4               yi5                yi6
       Desire to                                   Find other           Change           Create            Create         Develop the         Give more
                                                 employment or          trade or        their own         their own        content of       time for their
                                                change company         profession       business          business         their work       personal life
       Constant                                     1.2498***           0.7108**        ‑0.6788**        0.9530***         1.0030***           ‑0.2821
                                                                  Confidence in the future
       Believe that they will have the following opportunities in the coming year...
                             … promotion             ‑0.1767*            ‑0.0327         0.1834*         0.5567***           0.0810             0.1011
                     … a salary increase              0.0139              0.0155         ‑0.0125          ‑0.1840*           0.0408            ‑0.0892
                      … to keep their job            ‑0.0871             ‑0.1172         ‑0.0522           0.0330            0.1286            0.2118**
                                                                Employment characteristics
       On a permanent contract                        0.0651             0.1958*         ‑0.1130           0.0146           ‑0.0932            0.1838*
       Work part‑time                                ‑0.1078              0.0858         ‑0.0521         ‑0.4604***        ‑0.4063***         ‑0.2602**
       Length of service in the company (ref. = less than one year)
                            1 to < 2 years            0.0933             ‑0.0255          0.0165          ‑0.0487           ‑0.2688*           ‑0.1902*
                            2 to < 4 years           ‑0.3043*            ‑0.1382          0.0145           0.1653           0.4000**            0.0387
                          4 or more years            ‑0.0207              0.0967         ‑0.2288          ‑0.0250            0.1352             0.1314
       Socio‑professional categories (ref. = executive engineer)
               Unskilled manual worker               ‑0.1063              0.0734          0.0592          ‑0.2708           ‑0.4458*            0.2921
                   Skilled manual worker            ‑0.4243**           ‑0.4156**         0.2547          ‑0.0724           ‑0.1582            ‑0.1415
       Unskilled white‑collar employee                0.1336              0.2654         ‑0.0375           0.3006            0.1739            ‑0.1679
          Skilled white‑collar employee               0.0491              0.0111         ‑0.2001           0.0665           ‑0.0616            ‑0.0748
                Technician or supervisor              0.1265             ‑0.1397          0.0952          ‑0.0321            0.2992             0.0689
                                                                 Subjective quality of work
       Believe their work...
                          … is interesting          ‑0.7343**           ‑0.6964**        ‑0.1876           0.3710           0.5590**           ‑0.1654
         ... matches their qualifications           ‑0.5813***         ‑0.6295***         0.0944          0.00647           ‑0.1476             0.0648
                     ... is sufficiently paid       ‑0.4380***           ‑0.1858        ‑0.5226***       ‑0.5177***        ‑0.5108***         ‑0.3556**
                             … is arduous             0.2467            0.4105**         ‑0.1322          ‑0.3358*          ‑0.0316             0.2302
                    ... makes it difficult
          to balance their personal and              0.3712*              0.2876          0.0560          0.4324**          0.3978**          1.1373***
                        professional life
                                                      Composite indicators of working conditions
       Opportunity for personal
                                                    ‑0.3357***         ‑0.2730***       ‑0.2146**          0.0537           ‑0.00283           ‑0.0421
       development
       Work intensity                                 0.0104              0.1014         ‑0.0543           0.0137           ‑0.1338            0.1451*
       Freedom to discuss work                       ‑0.0156             ‑0.1235         ‑0.0405           0.0727            0.0246            0.1609**
       R2                                              0.24                0.24            0.11             0.17              0.16               0.20
      Reading note: All the models presented above are Logit models that take into account the complex survey sampling design (“Survey Logistic” pro‑
      cedure in SAS). The estimated parameters and their level of significance are indicated in the table (*** significant at the 1% threshold, ** significant
      at the 5% threshold, * significant at the 10% threshold). The following control variables are included in the specification: age, level of educational
      attainment, gender, company size and business sector. The full results are given in the appendix.
      Sources and Coverage: Cnefp‑Céreq, Defis 2015. Employees under the age of 30 from companies with ten or more employees in December 2013
      who had been in employment for the 18 months that followed that date (N=2,885).

      economic growth in France from 1945 to 1975),                                  However, the many economic crises that have
      was dominant until the beginning of the 1980s                                  shaken the job market following that period and
      (Germe et al., 2003; Amossé, 2002‑2003).                                       the “democratisation” of higher education have

120                                                                         ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020
What do Young Employees Dream of? Quality of Work, Career Aspirations and Desire for Mobility

           impacted on the professional prospects of young         you work” is higher among young employees
           people entering working life. How do they talk          with between one and less than two years of
           about their desire to “carve out a career” nowa­        service in a company).
           days? What are their career aspirations?
                                                                   Lastly, all things being equal, “believing that
           Improvement in terms of employment remains              you have opportunities for progression” has a
           an essential feature of the plans put forward by        positive impact on expressing the wish to “take
           young employees. Status, working hours and              on new responsibilities”, while believing that
           remuneration are all determining factors of their       “you are not at risk of losing your job” appears
           living standards (housing, family plans, etc.).         to be a necessary condition for wanting “to give
           This is also highlighted in studies carried out         yourself more time for your personal life”.3
           on the basis of the Céreq Génération survey
           (Céreq, 2017) on mobility aspirations according
           to employment status.3                                  2.2. The Quality of Work, a Major Factor
                                                                   in Career Aspirations
           The examination of the links between the terms
           of employment of young employees and their              The quality of work, as we see it, can be assessed
           career aspirations sheds additional light on this       through two different dimensions.
           point. All things being equal, the estimation of
           the probability of a young employee expressing          The first brings together the factual charac­
           their desire for professional development               teristics of the work (“working conditions” in
           shows that terms of employment do not have a            the model). For this, it is necessary to create
           significant impact here (Table 4). However, some        composite indicators, in the same way as Asselin
           characteristics associated with working hours           (2009), in order to synthesise three constituent
           (percentage of full‑time employment), length            parts: the opportunity for personal development,
           of service in the company or the level of skill         the intensity of the work and the freedom to
           of the position held all have a notable influence.      discuss work and training with the employer.
                                                                   Information about each of these parts is recorded
           In this regard, we can highlight the fact that          via variables from the Defis system, which are
           holding a position as a skilled manual worker           used to calculate the following composite indica­
           reduces the probability of expressing the               tors (the calculation is detailed in Box 3):
           desire to “find other employment or change
                                                                   ‑ opportunity for personal development includes
           company” and to “change profession or trade”.
                                                                   the variables: work that is not boring, that does
           It is undoubtedly the case for these employees
                                                                   not involve repetitive actions, fully using your
           that there is a greater level of correspondence
                                                                   skills, having increased your skills, having
           between their initial training and the skill level
                                                                   learned new things or having had to resolve
           of the position held and that there are real
                                                                   unforeseen problems;
           career development opportunities within their
           companies. Indeed, among young people, more             ‑ intensity of work includes the variables:
           skilled manual workers report fully using their         holding different positions, regularly working
           skills in their work that in any other category         more than 45 hours, being required to rush,
           (68% compared with 59% of young employees               working staggered or irregular hours, alternating
           overall). These results are consistent with those       shifts or working at night;
           obtained by Lebeaux (2004) using the Céreq
           Génération surveys, which showed that skilled           ‑ freedom of discussion includes the variables:
           young people tend to be more satisfied with their       having the possibility to discuss the content of
           situation and more optimistic about their future        your work with your supervisor, having made
           than unskilled young people.                            suggestions to improve your workstation; being
                                                                   able to amend or decide your working hours,
           The desire to “develop the content of their             asking for training, turning down a training
           work” seems to be more characteristic of young          suggestion, not receiving instructions or orders
           employees who have worked at a company for              or not being monitored in your work.
           between two and less than four years. It is during
           this period that they feel it is time to expand
           their skills. Below two years of service, young         3. In 2016, of those young employees who had left the education system
           employees potentially feel that they have not           three years before, 10% were looking for another job: 5% of public officials,
                                                                   8% of young people with permanent contracts, 14% of temporary workers,
           yet exhausted their position (the probability of        18% of young people in assisted jobs and 12% of young people in other
           stating “do not wish to develop the content of          fixed‑term employment (Céreq, 2017).

ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020                                                                            121
Box 3 – Methodology for modelling composite indicators

      Three approaches are primarily used to construct the              where K = number of categorical indicators,
      composite indicators: one based on the fuzzy set theory,          Jk = number of categories for the indicator k,
      the entropy method and, the most widespread, the
      approach based on inertia. The third option is the one            W jkk = the weighting (score of the first normalised axis,
      we have adopted for this study. It comes from the field            score
      of statistical mechanics and is based on data analysis                      ) of the category jk (the score corresponding to the
                                                                              λ1
      techniques. The main advantage of this inertia approach
      (Asselin, 2009) is that it makes it possible to remove the        coordinate of each method in the first factorial axis and
      arbitrariness from the calculation of a composite indica‑         λ1 the first eigenvalue),
      tor. To implement this approach, we use multiple corres‑          I kjk = the binary variable 0/1, taking the value 1 when the
      pondence analysis (MCA), which is the data analysis               unit has category jk.
      technique most suitable for our case, as all the variables
      are qualitative and can be coded as either 0 or 1.                Therefore, the value for the composite indicator for an
                                                                        employee is the average of the weighting categories
      The functional form of each composite indicator is defi‑          corresponding to the average of the normalised scores
      ned as follows:                                                   on the first factorial axis. In other words, it is the fac‑
                                                                        torial coordinate of the employee on the first axis that
      Taking m as the index of a given employee and Cm as
      their eigenvalue for the composite indicator, the functio‑        classifies the employees depending on their situation of
      nal form of the composite indicator is therefore:                 constraint or well‑being.
                K Jk

               ∑ ∑W jkk I kjk                                           The variables used for the composite indicators of wor‑
       Cm =
               k =1 jk
                                                                        king conditions are the following binary (yes/no) variables:
                       K

       Variables                                                                                                            %
       Composite indicator of opportunity for personal development
       Are not bored in their work (or only sometimes)                                                                     84
       Their work does not involve continually repeating the same series of actions or activities                          42
       Can use all their skills in their work                                                                              59
       Have increased their skills over the last 12 months                                                                 68
       Their work involves learning new things                                                                             73
       Their work involves resolving unforeseen problems                                                                   82
       Composite indicator of intensity of work
       Hold different positions                                                                                            45
       Regularly work more than 45 hours                                                                                   21
       Are required to rush to do their work
       ‑ all the time                                                                                                      21
       ‑ often                                                                                                             35
       ‑ sometimes                                                                                                         32
       ‑ never                                                                                                             12
       Work staggered hours                                                                                                43
       Work irregular or alternate shifts                                                                                  41
       Work at night                                                                                                       14
       Composite indicator of freedom of discussion
       Can discuss the content of their work with their supervisor                                                         79
       Have made suggestions to improve their workstation                                                                  93
       Have the option to amend or decide on their working hours                                                           50
       Are able to ask for training                                                                                        75
       Can refuse a training suggestion                                                                                    68
       Receive orders/instructions
       ‑ that they apply to the letter                                                                                     49
       ‑ but sometimes do things differently                                                                               40
       ‑ but mostly do things differently                                                                                   3
       ‑ does not receive orders/instructions                                                                               8
       Their work is not monitored                                                                                         45
      Sources: Cnefp‑Céreq, Defis 2015.

122                                                             ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020
What do Young Employees Dream of? Quality of Work, Career Aspirations and Desire for Mobility

           The second dimension brings together subjective         youngest employees in society and plays a much
           elements that report the degree of satisfaction         larger role than other aspects associated with
           associated with the work (“subjective quality           employment.4
           of work” in the model): considering that your
           work is interesting, that it matches your quali­
           fications, that it is well paid, that it is arduous     3. The Career Plans of Young
           or makes it difficult to balance personal and           Employees: Five Types of Aspirations
           professional life.                                      and Three Options for Mobility
           Our investigations clearly show that the career         We can now turn our attention to drawing
           aspirations of young employees are closely              up an overview of the career aspirations of
           linked with the quality of the work they perform,       young employees. To do this, we construct a
           evaluated on the basis of factual characteris­          typology based on an ascending hierarchical
           tics and subjective assessments. There are              classification.54 By linking the data relating to the
           several particularly salient results worthy of          formulated aspirations and the employees’ own
           highlighting:                                           assessments of their work (subjective quality of
           ‑ the lack of opportunities for personal devel­         work as defined in the model), we can distribute
           opment and the arduousness of the work are              the population of young employees into five
           strongly associated with a desire for radical           classes on the basis of the orientation of their
           change: changing trade or profession;                   career plan.

           ‑ when the effect of the other characteristics
           is neutralised, the motivations for wanting “to         3.1. Construction of the Typology
           give yourself more time for your personal life”
           are closely linked to the intensity of work and         The first stage of this involved a multiple corre­
           the difficulties of balancing professional and          spondence factorial analysis carried out using
           personal life. In this same area, we can see that       12 active variables. Seven variables characterise
           freedom to discuss work content and the way it          the career aspirations of young people: taking
           is organised reduces the probability of feeling         on more responsibility; developing the content
           that the work takes up an excessive part of the         of their work; changing trade or profession;
           employee’s schedule;                                    finding other employment, changing company,
                                                                   joining the civil service; creating their own
           ‑ the estimations also bring to light the dual link     business; giving themselves more time for
           between the difficulties in balancing professional      their personal life; training. Five other variables
           and private life and the desire for professional        relate to their own assessment of their work:
           change. Some see this balance as favourable             it is interesting; it matches their qualifications;
           towards their work, shown by the fact they wish         they are paid sufficiently; they find their working
           to “take on more responsibility” or “develop            conditions arduous; they find it difficult to
           the content of their work” (notably graduates           balance their personal and family life with their
           with five years of higher education and execu­          professional life.
           tives). For others, the objective is to conserve
           “more time for their personal life” (for example,       The Figure below shows the projection of these
           employees in small companies). These results            active variables and the barycentres of the
           echo those of Amossé and Gollac, highlighting           classes on axes 1 and 3, which together account
           that “increased intensity of work is linked to          for around 30% of the total inertia. The hori­
           a rise in upward mobility for employees who             zontal axis 1 is mainly explained by variables
           have the resources to face the constraints, and         expressing satisfaction with work and job. Axis
           in downward mobility for those who do not”              3 is mainly explained by variables reflecting
           (Amossé & Gollac, 2008, p. 59);                         the desire for professional change (internal or
                                                                   external). The ascending hierarchical classifica­
           ‑ the more a young employee finds their job             tion gives five classes characterised in Table 5.
           interesting, the more they are inclined to want
           to develop the content of their work, as an inter­
           esting job undoubtedly opens up a wider range           4. Even if the characteristics associated with work quality that came to light
                                                                   during the studies differ depending on the type of plan.
           of development possibilities.                           5. The ascending hierarchical classification is a technical statistic that aims
                                                                   to separate a population into different classes or subgroups. The intention is
                                                                   that the individuals grouped into one class (intraclass homogeneity) are as
           In conclusion, the quality of work is clearly           similar as possible, while the classes themselves are as dissimilar between
           a major factor in the plans formulated by the           themselves as possible (interclass heterogeneity).

ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020                                                                              123
Figure – Multiple correspondance analysis
                                                                                                                                      Professional
                                                                                                                                development aspirations
                                                                       Work does not match qualification
                        -0.5                                                                                                                                                        Do not want more time for
                                           Work is not                                                                                                                                    personal life
                       -0.45                                                                          Want to create own business                               Work is not
                                           interesting
                        -0.4                                   Want to change                                                                                    arduous
                                                                                                                 Class 4                                                                Think they are
                       -0.35                                   trade/profession                         Create their own business                                                        paid enough
                        -0.3
                                                                                                                                                     No difficulties balancing professional
                       -0.25                                                      Want to change job                                                            and personal life
                                             Class 5
                        -0.2                                                                                               Want to take on more                    Class 1
                                        Finding a job that
                       -0.15           matches qualification                                                                    responsibility                Progressing via
                                                                                                                                                              internal mobility              Satisfaction with work
                        -0.1                                                                                                         Want to change the
                       -0.05                                                                                         Want to train     content of work                                               and job
                          0
                       0.05                                                                             Class 3                                                   Work is interesting
                        0.1                                                                             Relaxing                         Do not want to create a
      Axis 3 (9.91%)

                       0.15                                                                            constraints                              business                   Work matches
                                                                                                                                                                           qualifications       Do not want to train
                        0.2
                       0.25                                                         Think they are not paid                                             Do not want to                           Do not want to change
                                                                                            enough                                                      take on more                                trade/profession
                        0.3
                                                                                                                                                         responsbility        Do not want to change
                       0.35                                                                                                                                                                              Do not want
                        0.4                                                                                    Want more time for                        Class 2               the content of work      to change job
                       0.45                                                                                      personal life                       No aspiration for
                                                                                                                                                         change
                        0.5
                       0.55                                                                 Work is arduous
                        0.6
                       0.65
                        0.7                                            Have difficulties balancing
                       0.75                                            professional and personal
                        0.8                                                        life
                       0.85
                        0.9
                               1.3   1.2       1.1       0.9       1        0.8       0.7       0.6     0.5    0.4       0.3    0.2       0.1    0       -0.1     -0.2    -0.3    -0.4   -0.5    -0.6   -0.7    -0.8
                                                                                                                      Axis 1 (19.49%)

      Sources and Coverage: Cnefp-Céreq, Defis 2015. Employees under the age of 30 from companies with ten or more employees in December 2013
      who had been in employment for the 18 months that followed that date (N=2,885).

      3.2. Orientation of Career Plans                                                                                                this class are higher education graduates and
                                                                                                                                      are more often employed in large companies
      To characterise the career plans of young                                                                                       (1000+ employees), they logically hold more
      employees, we can start by recalling the fact                                                                                   skilled positions (engineers and technical execu­
      that six in ten report that they wish to change                                                                                 tives, skilled industrial workers). This class by
      employment or company (cf. Table 3). Yet an                                                                                     far includes the highest proportion of employees
      even larger proportion seems, instead, to want                                                                                  working full‑time: only 6% work part‑time,
      development within the company they work in.                                                                                    compared with an average of 12%. However,
      However, within these desires for mobility or                                                                                   they do not stand out from the population as a
      change, the nature of the aspirations stated and                                                                                whole in terms of the type of work contract (78%
      the reasons for dissatisfaction regarding their                                                                                 are on permanent contracts; 79% on average).
      current situation are quite heterogeneous. It is
      also likely that some of these mobility aspirations                                                                             These employees are satisfied with their
      will become reality in line with the opportunities                                                                              professional situation and the balance that
      that present themselves.6 Lastly, one group of                                                                                  they are achieving with their family life. With
      young employees seem not to really have any                                                                                     a higher‑than‑average length of service within
      aspirations to change their situation.                                                                                          their company and reporting a low risk of
                                                                                                                                      losing their job, they plan to develop within the
      3.2.1. Progressing via Internal Mobility                                                                                        company that employs them.6

      The first class of the typology (see Figure                                                                                     The composite indicators for quality of work
      and Table 5), which covers 31% of young                                                                                         calculated for this class report advantageous
      employees, is dominated by those who plan to                                                                                    conditions compared with the population as a
      progress within the company that employees
      them. As the majority of the young people in
                                                                                                                                      6. As highlighted by Amossé (2003) with regard to all employees.

124                                                                                                                     ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020
What do Young Employees Dream of? Quality of Work, Career Aspirations and Desire for Mobility

                                                 Table 5 – Characterisation of typology classes (%)

                                                                                     Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5   Total
            Total                                                                      31      15      22      16      16      100
            Work satisfaction
            The work involves learning new things                                      86      61      82      73      49       73
            Find their work interesting                                                99      90      99      96      32       87
            Think their work matches their qualifications                              85      76      79      76      12       69
            Are not bored in their work                                                93      90      89      86      50       84
            Use all their skills in their work                                         73      65      57      59      28       59
            Think they are paid enough for the work they do                            73      69      22      36      25       48
            Are generally satisfied with their professional situation                  87      80      72      74      29       71
            Perception of their future
            Think they will have opportunities for promotion                           49      36      39      44      25       40
            Think they will have opportunities for a salary increase                   44      29      36      39      22       36
            Think they risk losing their job                                           15      20      20      24      28       20
            Training and development of skills
            Have increased their skills                                                76      67      71      67      50       68
            Have taken part in at least one organised training course                  49      36      50      47      40       46
            Work‑related interview
            Have had a work‑related interview with their superior                      79      57      72      69      58       69
            Spoke about what they learn in their job                                   83      74      84      82      68       80
            Spoke about their career prospects                                         90      80      89      84      79       86
            Spoke about their training needs                                           84      74      83      78      65       79
            Absence of training
            Have not been trained                                                      60      67      60      57      66       61
            Have not been trained and felt they missed out                             27      54      13      13      31       27
            Have not been trained and did not feel they missed out                     33      13      47      44      35       34
            Have not been trained and have received at least one offer of training     19       7      20       9      13       14
            Have not been trained and have received no offers of training              41      60      40      48      53       47
            Difficulties at work
            Think they are missing some skills                                         56      27      58      59      34       49
            Think their working conditions are arduous                                 14      42      61      36      57       39
            Are required to rush to do their work                                      42      48      74      53      67       56
            Have difficulty in balancing personal and professional life                 5      10      64      27      41       28
            Work staggered hours                                                       45      57      69      49      70       57
            Work more than 45 hours/week                                               18      19      36      20      10       21
            Aspirations
            More time for their personal life                                          29      27      86       62     49       49
            To train                                                                   82      32      91       89     81       77
            To take on more responsibility                                             86      13      88       89     67       73
            To change the content of their work                                        95       9      93       95     74       79
            To find other employment or change company                                 36      44      62       78     94       59
            To change trade or profession                                              22      28      40       56     89       43
            To create their own business                                                5      16       1      100     24       24
            Asking for training
            Are able to ask for training                                               83      66      82      72      64       75
            Have asked for training                                                    41      19      45      34      24       35
            Have asked for training as they have not been trained                      14       9      17      13      12       13
            Asked for training as not trained and no offers received                   11      8       13      11      11       11
            Want to train and have made a request                                      36      9       40      32      20       30 ➔

ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020                                                                 125
Table 5 (contd.)

                                                                                Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5                       Total
       Composite indicators of work quality (average)
       Opportunities for personal development                                    0.33        ‑0.18       0.15         ‑0.12       ‑1.09       ‑0.08
       Work intensity                                                            ‑0.40       ‑0.09       0.34         ‑0.12       0.15        0.05
       Ability to discuss                                                        0.25        ‑0.08       ‑0.00        ‑0.06       ‑0.62       ‑0.04
      Reading note: Among young employees in class 1, 99% think that their work is interesting.
      Sources and Coverage: Cnefp‑Céreq, Defis 2015. Employees under the age of 30 from companies with ten or more employees in December 2013
      who had been in employment for the 18 months that followed that date (N=2,885)

      whole: the opportunities for personal develop­                        The composite indicators of quality of work
      ment are estimated to be greater, the intensity                       calculated for this class report conditions close to
      of work much lower and freedom of discussion                          the average when compared with the population
      much higher, thereby opening margins for                              as a whole: there are slightly fewer opportuni­
      negoti­ation regarding the work performed.                            ties for personal development but freedom of
                                                                            discussion is in line with the general average.
      Young employees in this group consider that                           Their work is also less intense.
      their job matches their level of qualification and
      allows them to make full use of their skills. Even                    The development they envisage calls for training:
      so, they do not wish to stop there, stating their                     relatively, a smaller‑than‑average proportion of
      desire to train in order to develop their skills.                     this class believes they lack the skills to carry out
      The prospect of upward mobility within their                          their plan and a greater number report a desire
      current company is underpinned by the develop­                        to train than in other categories. 44% of them
      ment of their skills (76% state that they have                        did not undertake any training during the year
      gained in skills over the last 18 months). This                       preceding the survey, stating the lack in skills
      development has been supported by organised                           they feel associated with the absence of training.7
      training courses: 49% accessed training over
      the last 18 months. This group seems to fit                           3.2.3. Changing for a Job That Matches
      the career profile driven by internal mobility                        Their Qualification
      within a company offering opportunities for
      progression.                                                          Class 5 of the typology, which covers 16% of
                                                                            the young people, is dominated by those whose
      3.2.2. Creating Their Own Business to Relax                           desire for change reflects their dissatisfaction
      the Relationship of Subordination and Gain                            associated with the (generally unfavourable)
      Autonomy                                                              gap between the job they do and the qualifica­
                                                                            tions they have obtained. They describe their
      Class 4 of the typology accounts for 16% of                           employment as arduous (many report staggered
      the young employees who all aspire to create                          hours), poorly paid, uninteresting, repetitive
      their own business. These are more often men,                         and not very compatible with their personal
      non‑graduates and employees in the commerce                           life (even though they are the group with the
      and repairs sector. They mainly work in small                         highest rate of part‑time working, which seems
      companies (10 to 19 employees) or large compa­                        to indicate that the organisation of their time
      nies (500 to 1,000 employees). They report                            is not facilitated by this, especially when their
      being partially satisfied with their employment,                      staggered working hours counteract the balance
      believing their work to be interesting and that it                    between personal and professional life). Many of
      matches their qualification level. Even so, a huge                    the people in this class state that their skills have
      proportion (95%) wants to “develop the content                        not been expanded over the last few months.
      of their work” and take on more responsibility.                       They have rarely had access to training over the
      Two thirds do not believe they are paid enough                        last 18 months and have fewer possibilities than
      for the work they do. They desire more time for                       other groups to ask for it.
      their personal life (62%) while taking on more
      responsibility (89%). A greater‑than‑average                          7. This 44% corresponds to the proportion of employees in class 4 who
                                                                            have both received no training and answered negatively when asked:
      percentage highlights the risk of losing their job                    “Have you missed out on training?” (See table 5 “Have not received training
      (24% compared with 20% on average).                                   and did not feel they missed out”).

126                                                                 ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020
What do Young Employees Dream of? Quality of Work, Career Aspirations and Desire for Mobility

           This is the group with the highest number of            3.2.5. No Desire for Change
           women, bringing together the categories of
           skilled and unskilled white‑collar employees:           Not all young employees desire change. Class 2,
           administrative or commercial employees, or              for example, which covers 15% of this popu­
           direct personal service staff. With a high presence     lation, is dominated by those who state no
           in the hospitality and commerce sectors, these          prospect of change. They report that they are
           young employees often work in relatively large          generally satisfied with their employment and
           companies (250 to 500 employees) or for brand           believe they are sufficiently paid for the work
           networks.                                               they do, which they do not find very arduous.
                                                                   Their work seems to match their qualifications
           The composite indicators for quality of work            and allows them to make full use of their skills,
           calculated for this class report very unfavourable      which they do not plan to develop. Incidentally,
           conditions compared with the population as a            they develop extensively within professional
           whole: they believe they have far fewer opportu­        contexts that offer little training and that show
           nities for personal development, the intensity of       little concern for organising the mobility of their
           work is much higher and freedom of discussion           employees. These employees are often manual
           relatively limited.                                     workers, whether skilled or unskilled, and carry
                                                                   out their work activities in small companies, in
           3.2.4. Changing for a Better Work‑Life                  the transport and hospitality sectors. The fact
           Balance                                                 that they work in trades experiencing labour
                                                                   shortages protects them from unemployment.
           Class 3 of the typology, covering 22% of young          This may mean that they do not see the need
           employees, is dominated by those who would              to train or, more generally, to gain new skills
           like to better balance their personal and profes­       to protect themselves, as they believe they will
                                                                   easily find another job in case of dismissal or end
           sional lives in order to improve their quality of
                                                                   of contract. Consequently, despite low levels of
           life. For a long time, the matter of balancing
                                                                   access to training (33% participated in a training
           personal and professional life seemed only to
                                                                   course over the last 18 months) compared with
           have affected women, who were subjected to a
                                                                   those in the other groups, they express few
           professional calendar dominated by the mascu­
                                                                   training needs. The composite indicators for
           line career model, itself loaded with progression
                                                                   quality of work calculated for this class report
           opportunities at the very moment that women
                                                                   conditions that are close to the average.
           are most often invested in maternity. However,
           women are only slightly overrepresented in this
           class. The question of achieving a better balance
           has therefore reached and convinced young                                      * *
           men, or at least some of them. The employees                                    *
           in this group are more qualified than average,
           but, unlike those in class 1, report unsatisfactory
           working conditions more frequently than others.         Following our investigations, several major
                                                                   findings emerge. The aspirations of young
           The composite indicators for quality of work            employees do not fit one single model by far.
           calculated for this class report conditions that        Indeed, their aspirations for upward profes­
           can prove problematic compared with the                 sional mobility and the adjustments between the
           population as a whole. Although they have               qualifications they have gained and the job they
           better‑than‑average opportunities for personal          hold permeate a large number of the prospects
           development, the intensity of their work is higher      developed by young employees, although they
           and the freedom of discussion relatively limited.       are juxtaposed by plans organised primarily
                                                                   around a relaxing of professional constraints,
           The difficulty in balancing personal and profes­        in order to achieve a better work‑life balance
           sional life is largely due to time management.          or increase their autonomy. For example, terms
           More young people in this category than in              of employment (status, level of skill of the
           others find their work arduous (61%, compared           position held, working hours) remain a major
           with 39% on average) due to staggered hours             determining factor of their aspirations, but do not
           (69%, compared with 57% on average) or the              show the whole picture. The quality of the work
           need to “rush” or working hours of more than            performed also bears heavily on the aspirations
           45 hours per week (36%, compared with 21%               of young employees. Consequently, it is useful
           on average).                                            to fully understand the professional situations of

ECONOMIE ET STATISTIQUE / ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS N° 514-515-516, 2020                                                       127
You can also read