Understanding Customer Experience - by Christopher Meyer and André Schwager
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Understanding Customer Experience by Christopher Meyer and André Schwager This article originally appeared in Harvard Business Review Article Reprint No. R0702G brought to you by Harvard Business Review articles are brought to you by Zurich HelpPoint as part of the Managing Risk Series. Zurich neither endorses nor rejects the information presented in the article. We do not guarantee the accuracy of this information or any results and further assume no liability in connection with this publication including any information or methods contained herein.
Companies that systematically monitor customer experience can take important steps to improve it—and their bottom line. Understanding Customer Experience by Christopher Meyer and Andre Schwager Anyone who has signed up recently for cell comparison shopping and thus price wars. phone service has faced a stern test in trying to In the second, the company offered a hard-to- figure out the cost of carry-forward minutes obtain rebate to stimulate a purchase. And in COPYRIGHT © 2007 HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL PUBLISHING CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. versus free calls within a network and how it the third, the goal was to slash staffing costs, compares with the cost of such services as push- despite soothing claims of 24-hour self-service to-talk, roaming, and messaging. Many, too, availability. Unfortunately, such cunning makes have fallen for a rebate offer only to discover for customer experiences that engender regret that the form they must fill out rivals a home and then the determination to do business mortgage application in its detail. And then elsewhere. there are automated telephone systems, in Customer experience encompasses every which harried consumers navigate a mazelike aspect of a company’s offering—the quality of menu in search of a real-life human being. So customer care, of course, but also advertising, little confidence do consumers have in these packaging, product and service features, ease electronic surrogates that a few weeks after the of use, and reliability. Yet few of the people re- Web site www.gethuman.com showed how to sponsible for those things have given sustained reach a live person quickly at ten major con- thought to how their separate decisions shape sumer sites, instructions for more than 400 ad- customer experience. To the extent they do ditional companies had poured in. think about it, they all have different ideas of An excess of features, baited rebates, and a what customer experience means, and no one paucity of the personal touch are all evidence more senior oversees everyone’s efforts. of indifference to what should be a company’s Within product businesses, for example, prod- first concern: the quality of customers’ experi- uct development defers to marketing when it ences. In the first example, the carrier offered a comes to customer experience issues, and both jumble of phone services in part to discourage usually focus on features and specifications. harvard business review page 1
Understanding Customer Experience Operations concerns itself mainly with quality, the company’s actual offerings, a company’s re- timeliness, and cost. And customer service per- examination of its initiatives and choices will sonnel tend to concentrate on the unfolding not suffice. The customers themselves—that is, transaction but not its connection to those pre- the full range and unvarnished reality of their ceding or following it. Even then, much service prior experiences, and then the expectations, is rote: Otherwise, why would service reps ask, warm or harsh, those have conjured up—must as they so often do, “Is there anything else I can be monitored and probed. help you with?” when they haven’t even dealt Such attention to customers requires a with the original reason for the call or visit? closed-loop process in which every function Some companies don’t understand why they worries about delivering a good experience, should worry about customer experience. Oth- and senior management ensures that the of- ers collect and quantify data on it but don’t cir- fering keeps all those parochial conceptions culate the findings. Still others do the measur- in balance and thus linked to the bottom line. ing and distributing but fail to make anyone This article will describe how to create such a responsible for putting the information to use. process, composed of three kinds of customer The extent of the problem has been docu- monitoring: past patterns, present patterns, mented in Bain & Company’s recent survey of and potential patterns. (These patterns can the customers of 362 companies. Only 8% of also be referred to by the frequency with them described their experience as “superior,” which they are measured: persistent, peri- yet 80% of the companies surveyed believe odic, and pulsed.) By understanding the that the experience they have been providing different purposes and different owners of is indeed superior. With such a disparity, pros- these three techniques—and how they work pects for improvement are small. But the need together (not contentiously)—a company is urgent: Consumers have a greater number of can turn pipe dreams of customer focus into choices today than ever before, more complex a real business system. choices, and more channels through which to pursue them. In such an environment, simple, What Customer Experience Is integrated solutions to problems—not frag- Customer experience is the internal and subjec- mented, burdensome ones—will win the alle- tive response customers have to any direct or giance of the time-pressed consumer. (For more indirect contact with a company. Direct contact on making the buying process simpler, see generally occurs in the course of purchase, use, James P. Womack and Daniel T. Jones, “Lean and service and is usually initiated by the cus- Consumption,” HBR March 2005.) Moreover, tomer. Indirect contact most often involves un- in markets that are increasingly global, it is planned encounters with representations of a dangerous to assume that a given offering, company’s products, services, or brands and communication, or other contact will affect takes the form of word-of-mouth recommenda- faraway consumers the same way it does those tions or criticisms, advertising, news reports, re- at home. views, and so forth. Such an encounter could Although few companies have zeroed in on occur when Google’s whimsical holiday logos customer experience, many have been trying pop up on the site’s home page at the inception to measure customer satisfaction and have of a search, or it could be the distinctive “po- Christopher Meyer (cm@fastcycle plenty of data as a result. The problem is that tato, potato” sound of a Harley-Davidson motor- .com) is the chairman of Strategic Align- measuring customer satisfaction does not tell cycle’s exhaust system. It might just be an e- ment Group, a consultancy based in anyone how to achieve it. Customer satisfac- mail from one customer to another. Portola Valley, California, that specializes tion is essentially the culmination of a series of The secret to a good experience isn’t the in innovation and time-based competi- customer experiences or, one could say, the net multiplicity of features on offer. Microsoft tion. He is the author of Fast Cycle Time result of the good ones minus the bad ones. It Windows, which is rich in features, may pro- (Free Press, 1993). Andre Schwager occurs when the gap between customers’ ex- vide what a corporate IT director considers a (aschwager@customersenseconsulting pectations and their subsequent experiences positive experience, but many home users .com) is a former president of Seagate has been closed. To understand how to achieve prefer Apple’s Macintosh operating system, Enterprise Management Software and a satisfaction, a company must deconstruct it which offers fewer features and configuration founder of Satmetrix Systems, a custom- into its component experiences. Because a options. A customer’s experience with an Apple er experience software company based great many customer experiences aren’t the di- device begins well before the purchaser turns in Foster City, California. rect consequence of the brand’s messages or it on—in the case of the iPod, perhaps with harvard business review page 2
Understanding Customer Experience the dancing silhouettes in the TV advertise- Thus, a supplier satisfies the purchasing de- ments. The origami-like (and recyclable) pack- partment of its business customer by providing aging enfolds the iPod as though it were a a balance of costs and benefits; it satisfies oper- Fabergé egg made for a czar. A small sticker, ations by offering products or services that are “Designed in California, Made in China,” com- easy to use; and it satisfies a customer’s execu- municates the message that Apple is firmly in tives by expanding capacity at the same rate as charge but also interested in keeping costs the customer and in general evolving alongside down. Even Windows users appreciate the de- it. Accordingly, sales and marketing do not vice’s intuitive, Mac-like feel and find that necessarily monopolize points of contact with downloading tracks from iTunes is easier than customers: Operations people at the first com- buying a CD on Amazon. Every Apple prod- pany deal directly with their counterparts at uct is designed with the overarching purpose the second, and so forth. The functional nature of making the time one spends with Apple an of the relationship—indeed, the fact that it is a enjoyable experience. true relationship—creates a pervasive aware- A successful brand shapes customers’ expe- ness of experience issues and priorities. riences by embedding the fundamental value Whether it is a business or a consumer being proposition in offerings’ every feature. For studied, data about its experiences are col- BMW, “the Ultimate Driving Machine” is lected at “touch points”: instances of direct much more than a slogan; it informs the com- contact either with the product or service itself pany’s manufacturing and design choices. In or with representations of it by the company or 2000, Mercedes-Benz introduced a system some third party. We use the term “customer that automatically controls the distance be- corridor” to portray the series of touch points tween a Mercedes and the car in front. BMW that a customer experiences. What constitutes would not consider developing such a feature a meaningful touch point changes over the unless it amplified rather than diminished the course of a customer’s life. For a young family driving experience. with limited time and resources, a brief en- Service quality and scope matter, too, but counter with an insurance broker or financial mostly when the core offering is itself a service. planner may be adequate. The same sort of ex- For example, the tracking and shipping sup- perience wouldn’t satisfy a senior with lots of port FedEx provides on the Internet and by time and a substantial asset base. phone is as important to customers as its fun- Not all touch points are of equivalent value. damental value proposition—on-time delivery. Service interactions matter more when the In their concern with logistics—how some- core offering is a service. Touch points that ad- thing is provided, not just what is provided— vance the customer to a subsequent and more business-to-business companies take after valuable interaction, such as Amazon’s straight- consumer-service companies. For both, the forward 1-Click ordering, matter even more. goal is to provide a positive experience to the Companies need to map the corridor of touch end user. The business partner or supplier of points and watch for snarls. At each touch a B2B company helps the latter do that first point, the gap between customer expectations by understanding where in its direct custom- and experience spells the difference between ers’ value chain the B2B can make a meaning- customer delight and something less. ful contribution, and then when and how. People’s expectations are set in part by their Those are different undertakings from cap- previous experiences with a company’s offer- turing and parsing a given human being’s ings. Customers instinctively compare each internal, ineffable experience. A business’s new experience, positive or otherwise, with “experience,” one might say, is its manner of their previous ones and judge it accordingly. functioning, and a B2B company helps its Expectations can also be shaped by market business customers serve their customers by conditions, the competition, and the cus- solving their business problems, just as an ef- tomer’s personal situation. Even when it is the fective business-to-consumer company fulfills company’s own brand that establishes expecta- the personal needs of its customers. In a B2B tions, the customer can be set up for disap- context, a good experience is not a thrilling pointment. For example, Dell transformed one but one that is trouble-free and hence re- buying computers over the Internet from a assuring to those in charge. risky to a reliable experience. When it ex- harvard business review page 3
Understanding Customer Experience tended that set of procedures to the selection treatment were growing far more slowly than and purchase of expensive plasma HDTV sets, expected. For HIV/AIDS patients, switching however, it disappointed. Dell did an effective medications, Gilead discovered, is very differ- job of creating positive customer expectations, ent from choosing an alternative cold remedy. but they turned out to be better fulfilled by the Switching requires ending a trusted relation- in-person sales force at Best Buy. ship in the hope of reaching an uncertain im- Ideally, good design makes both the provement level. The company also learned most routine and the weightiest customer that HIV-positive patients are far more inter- experiences—checking a price, getting a ested in the potential adverse effects of a new question answered, or placing a multimillion- drug than in its supposedly superior efficacy. dollar order—pleasant and efficient. How- With this new understanding, Gilead decided ever, even when dissatisfaction or wariness to emphasize in its marketing the new drug’s arises, artful control of consumer experi- lower incidence of serious side effects. It also ence can overcome it. segmented the patients’ physicians by their In its development of a new AIDS drug, willingness to prescribe a different medication Gilead Sciences provides a good example of from the ones they knew. Once Gilead made how a failure to understand the experience it easier for patients to switch drugs, the mar- and expectation component of a consumer seg- ket share of the company’s main competitor ment’s dissatisfaction can turn into a failure to dropped 33%. reach that segment. Upon releasing the new medication, which had demonstrated advan- Why the Neglect? tages over existing ones, Gilead noticed that CEOs may not actively deny the significance of while sales to patients new to therapy were ro- customer experience or, for that matter, the bust, sales to patients already undergoing tools used to collect, quantify, and analyze it, CEM Versus CRM Customer experience management and customer relationship management differ in their subject matter, timing, monitoring, audience, and purpose. What When How Monitored Who Uses Relevance to the Information Future Performance Customer Captures and At points of Surveys, targeted Business or Leading: Locates Experience distributes what customer studies, observa- functional leaders, places to add Management a customer thinks interaction: tional studies, in order to create offerings in the (CEM) about a company “touch points” “voice of customer” fulfillable expecta- gaps between research tions and better expectations and experiences with experience products and services Customer Captures and After there Point-of-sales data, Customer-facing Lagging: Drives Relationship distributes what is a record market research, groups such as cross selling by Management a company knows of a customer Web site click- sales, marketing, bundling products (CRM) about a customer interaction through, automated field service, and in demand with tracking of sales customer service, ones that aren’t in order to drive more efficient and effective execution harvard business review page 4
Understanding Customer Experience but many don’t adequately appreciate what data start flowing, the bogeymen come out of those tools can reveal. Three forces in the the closet. Can we afford to do what customers main conspire to preserve this gap. are asking for? How do we choose between Too much money already lavished on conflicting preferences? Can we accept what CRM. Having spent millions of dollars on cus- customers say they are experiencing without tomer relationship management software, first telling them what they should be experi- many CEOs consider their problem to be not a encing? Corporate leaders who would never lack of customer information but a superfluity tolerate a large gap between forecasted and of it. Before investing more time and money, actual revenues prefer to look the other way executives justifiably want to know how cus- when company and customer assessments di- tomer experience data are different and what verge, as they do in the Bain survey. their value is. Executives also hesitate to act on findings To put it starkly, the difference is that CRM because experience data are more ambiguous captures what a company knows about a par- than customers’ actions—the orders they ticular customer—his or her history of service place, for instance. However, statistical analy- requests, product returns, and inquiries, among sis has developed to the point where it can other things—whereas customer experience dependably quantify both the relative impor- data capture customers’ subjective thoughts tance of each touch point and the experience about a particular company. CRM tracks cus- it provided. It can also isolate key transac- tomer actions after the fact; CEM (customer tions, accounts, regions, customer segments, experience management) captures the imme- and so forth, and then parse the resulting diate response of the customer to its encoun- data. About ten years ago, companies started ters with the company. Employees accustomed collecting experience information electroni- Corporate leaders who to reading the marketing department’s dry cally. Now they can instantly combine it with analyses of CRM point-of-sale data easily grasp data collected from CRM systems and other would never tolerate a the distinction upon hearing a frustrated cus- customer databases, conduct analyses of both tomer’s very words. (For a detailed account of individual and aggregate responses in real large gap between the difference between the two approaches, time, and then automatically route and track forecasted and actual see the exhibit “CEM Versus CRM.”) issues needing resolution. Moreover, many CEOs don’t sufficiently ap- Squishier are observation studies and ver- revenues prefer to look preciate the distinction between customer sat- batim comments, which for that reason don’t the other way when isfaction, which they believe they have heavily get the attention they deserve. Approached, documented, and customer experience, which however, with the requisite empathy and in- company and customer always demands further investigation. sight, they can be in their own way more re- Lack of attunement to customers’ needs. vealing than concrete findings. For one thing, assessments diverge. Leaders who rose through customer-facing even consumers sharply aware of a product’s functions, such as Cisco Systems CEO John or brand’s deficiencies can’t quite picture Chambers, are more likely to act with refer- what might replace it. That’s why Henry Ford ence to customer experience than those who said that if he asked his customers before have not. When competing new technologies building his first car how he could better meet are difficult to choose among, Cisco defers its their transportation needs, they would have choice until key customers have registered said simply, “Give us faster horses.” Properly their reactions. Because the company knows understood, the currents beneath the surface there will be a market for the choice it finally that direct the flow of customer experience makes, it can afford to commit itself later than data will indicate the shape of the next major its competitors. transformation. In contrast, executives who rose through finance, engineering, or manufacturing often All Hands on Board regard managing customer experience as the Many organizations place responsibility for responsibility of sales, marketing, or customer collecting and assessing customer experience service. data within a single, IT-supported customer- Fear of what the data may reveal. It’s easy facing group. Doing so accomplishes at least to say one’s business is customer-driven when three things: It saves money; it protects cus- there are no data to prove otherwise. Once tomers from redundant and annoying solicita- harvard business review page 5
Understanding Customer Experience tions; and it permits direct comparison of cus- used as a cell phone, the device consumed far tomers on the basis of their location, choice of more power than it did when used as an orga- product, or some other criterion. nizer. So customers who were heavy users of But it is a mistake to assign to customer- the cell phone feature found that their Treos facing groups overall accountability for the were often losing power—and often at an in- design, delivery, and creation of a superior convenient distance from their rechargers. customer experience, thereby excusing those Complaints about this problem began showing more distant from the customer from under- up in Palm’s customer-service transaction sur- standing it. veys. But the customer service department In contrast to this common pattern, Palm could offer the Treo’s unhappy owners only drew on customer experience to make the Treo minor power-saving tips. one of its most successful products ever. A Dissatisfied with the status quo, customer combination of cell phone and Palm Pilot, the service vice president Dan Gilbert, showing original Treo used the same built-in recharge- unusual initiative, distributed the experience able battery as the Palm organizers. When data his department had collected to product Tracking Customer Experience: Persistent, Periodic, Pulsed Companies can monitor various patterns of interaction with customers to gain a better under- standing of the customer experience they are providing. Depending on the precise information a company is seeking, it may choose to analyze past patterns, present patterns, potential patterns, or a combination. Each pattern requires a distinct method of generating and analyzing data and will yield different types of insights. Pattern and Purpose Owner Data Collection Collection and Discussion and Frequency and Scope Analysis Methodology Action Forums Past Patterns: Captures Central group Persistent: > Web-based, in-person, > Analyzed within a recent experience. or functions > Electronic surveys or phone surveys functions, central > Intended to improve linked to high- > User forums and survey groups, or transactional experiences volume transactions blogs both > Tracks experience goals and or an ongoing feed- > Cross-functional trends back system issues directed to > Automatically trig- general managers > Assesses impact of new gered by the comple- > Strategic analysis initiatives tion of a transaction and actions directed > Identifies emerging issues > Focused, short-cycle, by general managers timed data collection Examples: Post-installation or > Feedback volun- customer service follow-up, teered by users in new-product-purchase follow-up online forums Present Patterns: Tracks current Central Periodic: > Web-based surveys > Initial analysis by relationships and experience group, > Quarterly account preceded by sponsoring group issues with an eye toward business reviews preparation in > Broader trends and identifying future opportunities. units, or person issues forwarded to > Relationship studies > Keeps a consistent yet deeper functions > Direct contact in general managers’ > User experience watch on state of relationship person or by phone strategic and operat- and other factors studies ing forums > Moderated user > Looks forward as well as > User-group polling > Deeper analysis of forums backward > Focus groups and emerging issues at > Used with more critical other regularly the corporate, busi- populations and issues scheduled formats ness unit, or local level Examples: Biannual account reviews, “follow them home” user studies Potential Patterns: Targets General Pulsed: > Driven by specific > Centered within inquiries to unveil and test management > One-off, special- customers or unique sponsoring group, future opportunities. or functions purpose driven problems with coordination by > Very focused and support from > Interim readings of central group Examples: Ethnographic design trends > Incorporates existing studies, special-purpose market knowledge of cus- studies, focus groups tomer relationship harvard business review page 6
Understanding Customer Experience development, which went to work on the prob- customer might desire, and what it sees as chal- lem. The next-generation Treo came with a lenges to its competitiveness. Given the broad battery that users replace. In 2005, sales were scope of the inquiry, this type of monitoring 71% higher than the previous year. shouldn’t be triggered solely by a customer- Typically, however, a vigorous reaction to in- initiated transaction. Instead, information on a telligence gathered on customer experience re- company’s key products and services should quires general management to orchestrate a be gathered at scheduled intervals, or “periodi- response to customer problems. Intuit learned cally.” Hewlett-Packard and the consulting firm that when it tried to address the trouble cus- BearingPoint, for example, approach every tomers were having installing a new release of key customer annually. By initiating contact TurboTax. The solution turned out to be cross- with different customers at different times functional, but no one who had been asked to throughout the year, BearingPoint has created deal with it was senior enough to “own” the en- an almost persistent data flow that does not de- tire installation process. pend on the completion of a given transac- tion, while permitting comparisons among Obtaining the Right Information customers on a range of issues. BearingPoint There are three patterns of customer experi- learned in this fashion that the best practices ence information, each with its own pace and it had established in one vertical-market level of data collection. (For a detailed break- group had not migrated to other groups. down of the three patterns, see the exhibit Present patterns are collected through sur- “Tracking Customer Experience: Persistent, veys or face-to-face interviews, studies tailored Periodic, Pulsed.”) to the subject, or some combination thereof. It When companies monitor transactions oc- helps to prepare customers for the inquiry by curring in large numbers and completed by in- telling them the purpose of the survey, how dividual customers, they are looking at past they will hear about the findings, and what patterns. Enterprise Rent-A-Car is supposed to role they might play in addressing them. Ac- ask every driver returning one of its vehicles, cordingly, Hewlett-Packard rewards its account “Would you rent from Enterprise again?” Any managers on survey-participation rates as well new service a France Telecom customer re- as results. ceives is followed by a brief questionnaire on Potential patterns are uncovered by probing the quality of his or her experience. As these for opportunities, which often emerge from two examples demonstrate, each attempt to interpretation of customer data as well as ob- determine the quality of the experience di- servation of customer behavior. Like the rectly follows the experience itself. So compa- study Gilead conducted, such probes are out- nies receive by this method an uninterrupted, growths of strategies usually involving the tar- or “persistent,” flow of information, which they geting of particular customer segments and then analyze and communicate internally. Al- are therefore unscheduled, or “pulsed.” The though surveys are the tool used most often findings are often used to inform the product for gathering data on past patterns, customers development process. are sometimes approached through online fo- Most companies apply a single summary rums and blogs. Companies are mostly guided metric to data on past and present patterns. by assertions that win customers’ strong agree- The customer experience metric Net Pro- ment, but sometimes customers’ failure to moter, for example, registers customers’ expe- react strongly to some feature or service can be riences in aggregate—that is, their positive just as telling. For this reason, the employees ones minus their negative ones. Intuit’s founder, evaluating results must be attuned to areas of Scott Cook, uses Net Promoter scores for goal customer experience that a survey or other setting and engaging the organization’s atten- tool does not directly address. tion, though he recognizes that a rising or Analyses of present patterns are not simply falling score doesn’t begin to reveal what is evaluations of the meaning and success of a re- driving the trend. cent encounter. They envision a continuing re- As relationships with customers deepen, lationship with the customer. Consequently, companies tend to collect data with greater fre- questions may extend to the customer’s aware- quency. The patterns that emerge suggest fur- ness of alternative suppliers, new features the ther areas of inquiry. For example, present- harvard business review page 7
Understanding Customer Experience relationship studies may indicate that on-site port, “Spark Innovation Through Empathic service experience is wanting. After improve- Design,” HBR November–December 1997.) In- ments are made, it’s common to use a transac- tuit, for example, is a leader in “follow them tion survey following each service call to assess home” studies. Company representatives visit progress. A subsequent, more comprehensive customers where they live or work and observe survey may show good experience with ser- how they use Intuit products such as Quick- vice response time but low overall ratings, Books. It was from watching the smallest busi- triggering a special study to identify custom- nesses struggle with QuickBooks Pro that the ers’ priorities among a range of service experi- company recognized a need for a product like ence factors. QuickBooks Simple Start. These tools lend Low cost and ease of modification make sur- themselves to the measurement of present and veys the overwhelming favorite for measuring potential patterns, for they entail more time, past and present patterns. E-mail–based sur- preparation, and expense than transaction- veys are superior to paper-based ones because based surveys. they can be more easily shared; they allow rapid distribution; they give the surveyor the Acting on Experience Information flexibility to extend or abbreviate the question- Let’s take a look at a company we’ll call ing according to the wishes of the respondent HiTouch—which is actually a composite of or the substance of the response; they mini- companies—as it struggled to create a system mize delays in analyzing the results; and they for managing customer experience. HiTouch, lead to quick action, such as a referral to a gen- a business-to-business global financial services eral manager should scores fall below a prede- provider, received a shocking wake-up call termined level. E-mail surveys can also be when a top customer shifted half its business to A well-designed survey is more easily tailored. For example, the surveys an archrival. HiTouch executives had just com- Marvin Windows and Doors sends to its dis- pleted a quarterly account review classifying not simply one that elicits tributors are different from those sent to archi- the relationship with this account as “superior.” tects who buy its products. The stunned executives wondered what they the desired information. A well-designed survey is not simply one could have missed. It must itself avoid that elicits the desired information. It must it- From their efforts to salvage the account, Hi- self avoid becoming an unfortunate aspect of Touch executives learned enough to initiate a becoming an the customer experience. Hence, it shouldn’t companywide effort to improve the experience unfortunate aspect of the be onerous for the taker or deny him the of all other major accounts. After conducting a chance to communicate the special nature of mini-audit of existing customer-experience customer experience. his experience. One way of keeping surveys programs, responsible parties, and results, it mercifully brief is to avoid asking about mat- discovered that its vertical-market groups ters like recent purchases that the company al- hardly went further than tracking leads and ready has a record of. Nor should they be trig- analyzing buying patterns. Most employees gered by the transactions of regular customers assumed customer experience was the job of such as purchasing agents. Such customers are, marketing or sales. The company’s only CEM after all, among those a business can least af- metric came from a mailed annual customer ford to annoy. By the same token, corporate satisfaction survey whose wording hadn’t sanctions imposed on dealers who receive low changed in three years. scores shouldn’t be so harsh that retailers try to HiTouch engaged consultants to help with discourage customers from responding by of- the initiative. Rather than spending a lot of fering to fix any problem on the spot. The indi- time establishing formal customer experience vidual customer may be placated, but wide- goals or a detailed plan, the consultants ar- spread resort to this practice keeps general gued for a “fast prototype” relationship survey management from obtaining a broad picture of top customers. HiTouch’s leaders identi- of systemic problems. fied the touch points they knew had disap- Surveys do have their limitations, and focus pointed their most important customers. Pre- groups, user-group forums, blogs, and market- venting further customer defections, they ing and observational studies can yield insights realized, would require customer experience that surveys cannot. (For more on listening to goals for every stage of the value chain. These users, see Dorothy Leonard and Jeffrey Ray- had to serve every vertical market’s financial harvard business review page 8
Understanding Customer Experience objectives while being compatible with the “Do you believe HiTouch delivers the experi- company’s branding. ence promised by its marketing and sales As the issues piled up, it became clear that force?” The pilot survey included a summary the effort needed an executive leader, a bud- metric that permitted HiTouch to compare get, and dedicated resources. HiTouch’s top responses by location, service platform, and sales executive, having become a believer in vertical market. the process, stepped up. To ensure a good re- The sales executive noticed that meetings sponse rate, he asked sales account executives about the pilot survey, in which salespeople to prep customers receiving the survey. A few fed customer experience information back to showed a predistribution draft to customers the customers themselves, differed from the so that they could help refine issue selection typical sales call by shifting the dialogue away and tone. Of the various questions settled on, from the individual transaction and toward two key ones were “How important to your relationship development. They also provided purchasing decision was HiTouch’s brand and an excellent opportunity to introduce to the the service promise it seemed to make?” and customers HiTouch’s nonsales employees who Rating Customers The matrix in this exhibit organizes the cus- billings but high customer satisfaction, for ex- ample, customer A has the second-highest tomers of HiTouch (a composite of actual ample, represent growth opportunities for billings and the second-highest forecasted companies) on the basis of the level of atten- HiTouch. The bubbles on the matrix classify revenues, but its business is “at risk” because tion they require. The vertical axis shows HiTouch’s customers according to a third di- its satisfaction scores are low. Customer B’s billed revenues (products and services pro- mension: forecasted revenues (orders placed low billings, high satisfaction, and high fore- vided and paid for). The horizontal axis but not paid for as well as potential orders), casted revenues suggest unexploited poten- shows an aggregate score indicating level of indicated by bubble size. Letters inside the tial business for HiTouch. customer satisfaction. Customers with low bubbles serve strictly as identifiers. So, for ex- At-Risk Model $25,000,000 $20,000,000 A $15,000,000 Billed revenues $10,000,000 Customers with billed revenues above $10M are considered $5,000,000 high-value B 0 Customer satisfaction low high Dangling Growth bubble size represents forecasted revenues harvard business review page 9
Understanding Customer Experience were in a position to fix customer problems as tionship issues unearthed by customer surveys they arose. In this fashion, salespeople began kicked off quarterly executive strategy discus- to view their jobs less as a functional responsi- sions. Defections within each vertical-market bility than as an organizational process. group dropped by an average of 16%. Data from the survey began to flow within Not everything worked as hoped. The com- 24 hours of distribution. Many of customers’ pany set up an executive dashboard to keep verbatim comments were blunt. Some execu- track of installation experience issues, but the tives became defensive and tried to explain disclosure of high-volume transaction infor- away what the data were saying rather than mation so upset the managers responsible understand the concerns behind them. Some that they never got around to resolving the never quit demanding yet one more data underlying issues. The dashboard was pulled point. Others strained to launch company re- in favor of automatic triggers that channeled sponses before fully understanding what was problems to specialists or general managers, being said. who began to make good progress in solving With 60% of the responses in, it became them. Increased analyst staffing and simpli- clear which experiences were critical to overall fied reporting helped the general managers satisfaction. However, they were different in identify new opportunities, an area they had each vertical market, with few exceptions. been neglecting. For each, summary scores were compared with customer revenue. On that basis, finance The Employee Experience placed every customer in one of four quad- Customer experience does not improve until it rants (see the exhibit “Rating Customers”). becomes a top priority and a company’s work • Model customers: good summary scores; processes, systems, and structure change to re- good revenue. flect that. When employees observe senior • Growth customers: good summary scores; managers persistently demanding experience higher potential revenue. Candidates for cross information and using it to make tough deci- selling and upselling. sions, their own decisions are conditioned by • At-Risk customers: low scores; good reve- that awareness. nue. Demanding decisive intervention. Not long after breaking every software- • Dangling customers: low scores; low reve- industry growth record, Siebel Systems (now nue. To be rescued or abandoned. part of Oracle) saw its satisfaction ratings begin Auspiciously, the Growth segment had three to drop. An adopter of customer experience times as many customers as any of the others. management, the company had gathered data But on further examination it emerged that revealing that customers found a large dispar- some of those customers didn’t buy as much as ity between actual and expected costs of own- those in other quadrants. In fact, one of the ership of Siebel 6, a sales-force automation largest remaining customers was squarely in tool based on a client-server architecture. The the At-Risk quadrant. proposed solution, a shift to a Web-based ar- The results of the initial survey coincided chitecture in Siebel 7, would require forgoing with the start of the strategic-planning cycle. the development of other major features—and By the following quarter, every vertical-market the revenues they generated—for two years. team, having shown some customers the find- Yet Siebel’s leadership went ahead with the ings and described what the team planned to shift anyway. Satisfaction levels soon returned do about them, was ready to send out transac- to their formerly lofty levels, and employees tion surveys of customers’ experiences with took heart as management placed experience service installation and repair. Every team had ahead of revenues. also set experience goals for itself and sched- Once persuaded of the importance of experi- uled relationship surveys. ence, every function has a role to play. A year later, current experience data had re- Marketing has to capture the tastes and stan- placed ill-informed opinion at HiTouch. At dards of every one of its targeted market seg- monthly operations meetings, vertical-market ments, circulate that knowledge within the general managers reviewed key customer ex- company, and then tailor all consumer com- perience issues, and actions taken, before re- munications accordingly. viewing financials. A rolling summary of rela- Service operations must ensure that pro- harvard business review page 10
Understanding Customer Experience cesses, skills, and practices are attuned to every ees’ individual capabilities, work processes, touch point. (Present-patterns surveys are and attitudes. As for performance manage- good for tracking high-volume touch points ment, of course customer experience results such as call centers.) should affect compensation. But as we have Product development should do more than learned in recent years, incentives that are too specify needed features. It should also design powerful are more likely to distort behavior experiences after observing how customers use than channel it productively. products and services, learning why they use Account teams must progress from annual offerings as they do, and figuring out how exist- surveys to detailed touch-point analysis, ing products might be frustrating them. Ide- then translate present patterns of customer ally, product developers will identify customer experience and issues gleaned from recent behavior that runs counter to a company’s ex- transactions into action plans that are shared pectations and uncover needs that haven’t with customers. Not every significant impli- been identified. cation is readily apparent. Leaders need to Information technology that can collect, ana- press the data to precipitate customers’ con- lyze, and distribute CEM data, integrate the in- cealed longings. formation with that generated by CRM, and ••• monitor progress must be in place. As the data Customer dissatisfaction is widespread and, flow stabilizes, the form of presentation and its because of customers’ empowerment, increas- degree of detail should be keyed to whichever ingly dangerous. Although companies know a internal audience the data are meant for. A lot about customers’ buying habits, incomes, level of detail that is appropriate for an analyst, and other characteristics used to classify them, for example, can easily overwhelm a line man- they know little about the thoughts, emotions, ager. CEM is a play within a play, so to speak; and states of mind that customers’ interac- just as customers must have a good experience, tions with products, services, and brands in- employees need to have a good experience di- duce. Yet unless companies know about these gesting information about themselves. subjective experiences and the role every func- Human resources should put together a com- tion plays in shaping them, customer satisfac- munications and training strategy that conveys tion is more a slogan than an attainable goal. the economic rationale for CEM and paints a picture of how it will alter work and decision- Reprint R0702G making processes. Since the front line deter- To order, see the next page mines the bulk of customer experience, it or call 800-988-0886 or 617-783-7500 would be a good idea to study those employ- or go to www.hbr.org harvard business review page 11
The Zurich HelpPoint Perspective for all of us. From claims to underwriting to look ahead, rather than in the rearview mirror. operations, distribution, etc., every employee We know that our methods are working has a role in our value chain. At Zurich, we when we receive testimonials from satisfied have a branding statement, “We deliver when customers and brokers that we developed it matters.” This is embedded in our culture products and services that help address and permeates all levels of the company, their unique needs. We also track customer providing a consistent and meaningful retention where we actively engage Claims experience to our customers. and our customer service account executives. One of my favorite lessons on customer service We are proud to say we have a 90% retention comes from the story of a company that, after rate on these customers as of December 2010. seeing a decline in business, tried to solve its problems by finding a new ad agency. When How has information from tracking company executives went to the offices of customers changed the way you a potential ad agency, they were greeted by look at business and/or the way STEVE HATCH CHIEF CLAIMS OFFICER an unkempt individual, asked to wait in a you do business? ZURICH NORTH AMERICA COMMERCIAL disorganized conference room and ignored A true assessment of customer data requires for a significant period of time. When the a willingness to accept critical feedback, even How is “customer experience executives asked about the status of their if it means acknowledging that a customer’s management” different meeting, they were given no answers. Finally, needs are not being met. We must choose from “customer relationship the agency representatives arrived. Imagine to approach each situation as a challenge management”? the shock of the company executives when to improve and an opportunity to deliver on At every turn, our customers are assessing it was explained that the treatment they had our value proposition. The regular tracking how our performance as an insurance provider just received was based on feedback from the of candid customer feedback supports our matches their expectations. To best assess our company’s customers! The ad agency advised organizational philosophy of continuous customers’ satisfaction, we must capture their that advertising was not the problem at the improvement. It is our obligation to frequently service expectations and impressions of our business — it was customer service. realign with customers’ business needs and organization and how we do business — in work with them to help reduce risk, create other words, we must manage customers’ The key here is that the multiple roles we solutions and provide best-in-class service. total Zurich experience. have at Zurich are all integrated into a system that functions to help benefit our customers. While customer centricity will continue to be Once we understand the experience of a Reducing the quality of just one piece of this the overarching principle that governs our day- customer, we can begin to manage the system can significantly affect the customer to-day business practices, we will continue to relationship according to their needs, priorities, experience. build meaningful and specialized relationships challenges, etc. Customer relationship that bring success to our customers and, as a management is absorbing all we know about What is the best way to track result, to Zurich. a customer’s experience and using that knowledge to strengthen our relationship customer experience? How do you know you are asking the with them, thereby creating even better right questions? experiences. Our relationships with customers At Zurich, we track customer experience Zurich in North America is a part of Zurich truly transcend to an alliance aimed at through robust tools aimed at both customers Financial Services Group (Zurich), an insurance- mutually reducing their cost of risk. We do based financial services provider with a global and distribution channels. By evaluating this by understanding their risks, identifying network of subsidiaries and offices in North customer satisfaction survey results and America and Europe as well as in Asia Pacific, loss trends and creating solutions to help drive narrative feedback and reviewing our metrics, Latin America, and other markets. Founded better claim outcomes. Customer experience in 1872, the Group is headquartered in Zurich, we can get both subjective and objective management and customer relationship Switzerland, and employs approximately 60,000 measures of how well we are serving people serving customers in more than 170 management are at the very center of our customers and how this relates to the bottom countries, including more than 9,500 employees strategy of customer centricity. in North America. www.zurichna.com line of both the customer and Zurich. Why should customer service be Customer expectations and experiences are everyone’s business — not just that constantly changing, and frequent checks on of sales and customer service? their satisfaction allow us to identify potential We rely on our front line to be the face of issues that may lie ahead and tailor our actions Zurich, but customer centricity is a cornerstone accordingly. In other words, this allows us to
You can also read