Tricuspid Valve - Where are we? - Miami Valves 2023 - Azeem Latib MD
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Miami Valves 2023 Tricuspid Valve – Where are we? Azeem Latib MD Montefiore Medical Center New York, USA
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company • Grant/Research Support Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Philips, Abbott, Boston Scientific Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Shifamed, • Consulting Fees/Honoraria Philips, Abbott Vascular, CorFlow, Neochord, V- • Scientific Advisory Board dyne, Boston Scientific, Bolt Medical, Advanced NanoTherapies, Centerline Biomedical, Paladin Supira, CorFlow, Neochord, Vvital, • Equity Interest NuevoSono, Centerline Biomedical, Coramaze
Background • TR is common • Majority of TR is functional • TR is associated with a poor prognosis Wang N et al. European Heart Journal (2019) 40, 476–484
Proposal of New Pathophysiologic TR Classification No longer «Idiopathic» or «Isolated» TR Carpentier type I Carpentier type IIIb Carpentier type I-III
Anatomic variability of the TV The tricuspid valve is often not three leaflets! P2 S2 S P2 S1 P1 S A P1 A A Hahn et a., JACC Img 2021; 14(7):1299 2 leaflet 4 leaflet 5 leaflet
Does leaflet configuration matter? 69% 2.1% 27% 1.4% 3 2 4 5 Residual TR Clinical outcomes vs 1 Sugiura, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14(20):2260-70 2 Kitamura, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14(14):1616-18
Extended Grading of TR Prognostically important or developed to allow evaluation of devices that have only minimal impact on TR? MILD MODERATE SEVERE MASSIVE TORRENTIAL RT Hahn and JL Zamorano. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging (2017) 00, 1–2. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jex139
TR population is heterogenous!
Surgical outcomes of TV surgery 5,005 isolated TV operations between 2004-2013 12,567 patients undergoing TV Repair & Replacement between 2003-2014 (~20% of cases in US) No of patients undergoing TV surgery for TR increased by 48% from TV repair in 40.8%: TV replacement in 59.2% 3100 in 2003 to 4600 in 2014 TV Repair (n=7132) TV Replacement (n=2062) Isolated TVR in 38.6% Isolated TVr in 14.8% In-Hospital Mortality In-Hospital Mortality is still 8.8% Fahad Alqahtani et al. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e007597
Technologies
Transcatheter Tricuspid Landscape Trialign Cardioband TriCinch Millipede PASTA DaVingi MIA Annuloplasty Edge-to-Edge Mitralix Coaptation Enhancement TriClip Pascal Dragonfly Evoque Intrepid V-Dyne Navigate Trisol Lux Topaz Orthotopic Replacement TricValve TriCento Trillium Forma Croi Coramaze Tri-Flow Heterotopic Spacer Spacers Replacement
Indications/Advantages: • First-line therapy • Procedures are relatively safe Tricuspid TEER • Reduction in TR grade results in improvement in symptoms TriClip PASCAL Dragonfly Challenges: • Anatomical challenges: • Gaps >8mm • Septal leaflet tethering • Quadricuspid • Dense Chords • Pacemaker Leads • >3000 cases worldwide • >500 cases • Device and Procedure • CE-mark approval in 2002 worldwide • FIH started • Highly dependent on good TRILUMINATE Pivotal • CE-mark approval in • Only imaging & leaflet started 2020 available in visualization • G4 now available: 4 Clip • CLASP-TR Pivotal China • Residual TR sizes; independent started • Septal “hugging” and ability grasping. • 2 devices available; to be coaxial • Dedicated delivery system ACE in tricuspid • Procedural length for Tricuspid • Early in learning • Follow-up • Large amount of clinical curve • Durability data • SLDA • Likely to be 1st FDA • Gradients & TV stenosis approved device
What have the trials demonstrated? • Procedures are relatively safe • ~50% reduction in EROA • Improvement in clinical symptoms – Comparable to what was seen with MitraClip – Durability of benefit unclear • Patients often present with torrential TR
Challenges of TEER TR Severity
Tricuspid Annuloplasty Indications/Advantages: • Atrial Functional TR is common • Stand alone therapy or combination to decrease coaptation gaps • Leaves future options open Cardioband DaVingi Annuloplasty System
Other Repair Technologies Indications/Advantages: • Ability to treat TEER unfavorable cases • Suture-based TEER • Stand alone therapy or combination to • Septal leaflet enhancement decrease coaptation gaps • Leaves future options open • Non-ring annuloplasty devices • Chordal/Leaflet approximation
TR Reduction and Clinical Improvement TEER Direct Annuloplasty TR NYHA TR NYHA Modest reductions in TR seem to be associated with clinical benefit! Kodali S et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 2;77(4):345-356 Davidson CJ et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 11;14(1):41-50
Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement Indications/Advantages: • First-line therapy Evoque Lux Intrepid • TEER-unsuitable cases with large gaps, pacing leads, 4/5 leaflets, severe tethering • Complete elimination of TR Challenges: • Large annular size requiring large valves • RV size not large enough for • Transfemoral • Transatrial; Anchoring in RV • Transfemoral • 29Fr delivery system • >100 pts treated (China & • Sizes: 44mm, 48mm delivery system • Sizes: 44mm, 48mm, Canada) • EFS underway • Interaction with leads, prominent • TF under development 52mm papillary muscles, apex • Pivotal underway • Coaxiality and deliverability • >100 pts treated highly dependent on IVC-TA • Highly imaging relationship and RA size dependent • Early and late impact on RV • PM/ICD implantation: leadless, CS, epicardial Diastole Systole • Life-long anticoagulation
Transcatheter Tricuspid Landscape – New Tools EMERGING DEVICES WITH INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS Tricuspid Valve Spacers Forma CroíValve DUO Coramaze Bridging untreatable gaps High ease-of-use with potentially quick procedure Spacer + central valve (Croí)
Transcatheter Tricuspid Landscape – New Tools EMERGING DEVICES WITH INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS Tricuspid Valve Replacement V-dyne Side-ways delivery for large valve Tricares Topaz Trisol Flexible prosthesis for free & mobile RV base Single leaflet design w/ potential afterload decrease
Transcatheter Tricuspid Landscape – New Tools EMERGING DEVICES WITH INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS Heterotopic Valves NVT Tricento TricValve Trillium Sidestepping untreatable TV anatomies with massive RA/RV dilation Treatment gap in late stage TV disease Tackling systemic component of longstanding TR by unloading organs
Future
4D ICE Catheters Biosense Webster NuVision Philips VeriSight Pro 4D NuVera ICE Catheter™ >360° transducer rotation x 3 cm extension • 4D intracardiac echo • Wide 90° x 90° field of view 10F x 90 cm torqueable and • 10F size deflectable shaft • Independent rotation and extension • Tricuspid imaging potential • Conscious sedation Transducer orientation adjustment Shaft deflection Connector Cable
Tricuspid TEER with 4D-ICE A A P A S S P 3D en face Biplane inflow-outflow/grasp P A S Biplane inflow- P outflow/grasp
Biplane inflow-outflow/grasp P A S TTVR with 4D-ICE L
Pivotal Randomized Studies in TR The Edwards PASCAL TrAnScatheter Valve RePair System Patients with symptomatic severe TR despite medical therapy Pivotal Clinical Trial (CLASP II TR) (N=825) Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial • ≥ severe TR as assessed by echo Multidisciplianry core lab Heart Team • NYHA Class II-IVa • ≥ intermediate mortality risk with Purpose: Assessment tricuspid valve surgery Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PASCAL Repair System and optimal medical therapy (OMT) compared to OMT alone in patients with symptomatic severe TR PASCAL Repair System Principle Investigators: OMT alone + OMT ‒ Charles Davidson, MD ‒ Scott Chadderdon, MD Follow-up: 30 days, 6 months, 1 year and annually through 5 years ‒ Robert L. Smith, MD Primary Endpoint at 24 months Hierarchical composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, Trial Oversight: need for surgery on the tricuspid valve, and improvement of quality of life ‒ Central screening committee ‒ Data safety monitoring board ‒ Clinical events committee Recruiting (NCT04097145) ‒ Echocardiography imaging core laboratory ‒ Quality of life core laboratory ‒ Economic core laboratory Edwards Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Patients with Symptomatic ≥ Moderate Investigation of Safety and Clinical Efficacy Using a Tricuspid Regurgitation Novel Device • Functional or degenerative TR ≥ moderate Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled Heart Team • Signs and/or symptoms or prior heart Assessment pivotal trial failure hospitalizations from TR despite optimal medical therapy • Purpose | Evaluate the safety and performance of the transfemoral EVOQUE Valve Replacement System EVOQUE Valve Replacement System • Principal Investigator | Susheel K. Kodali, MD Follow-up: 30 days, 6 months, 1 year and annually through 5 years • Clinical Trial Oversight: • Data safety monitoring board Primary Endpoint: Freedom from device or procedure-related • Clinical events committee major adverse events at 30 days • Central screening committee • Echocardiography imaging core laboratory Currently recruiting patients (NCT04221490)
Final Messages
TTVI Selection Praz F et al. EuroIntervention 2021;17:791-808
New patients? NEXT PATIENTS/TARGET POPULATION The course of TR • Asymptomatic severe TR • Symptomatic moderate TR • Multivalvular dx w/ concomitant TR PREREQUISITES ➢ Know natural history of TR & which patients progress ➢ Have device solutions that prevent progression & leave future options Chang et al., EHJ 2019
New Tools for New patients Treatment & Safety Effectiveness Prevention Number of Procedures Asymptomatic severe TR Symptomatic Severe TR Severe TR Severe TR moderate TR Torrential TR Torrential TR with severe after left-sided undergoing due to due to PPM tethering, surgery with TMVI/R chronic AF leads Combined/staged unresponsive multiple Multi-valvular proc to diuretics comorbidities 2014 Current practice Ideal Target Compassionate Experimental Real-world use & first commercial cases Time
You can also read