The Ted Turner Drive Resilience Corridor Challenge - Renew Atlanta
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The Ted Turner Drive Resilience Corridor Challenge I. Background: The City of Atlanta joined the 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) network in 2016 and recently released its Urban Resilience Strategy which comprehensively addressed the various challenges the city faces. A key element of urban resilience planning is understanding a challenge from multiple perspectives, and then designing interventions that have multiple benefits. Through its Resilience Strategy, the city has identified key areas of focus, including water, energy, sustainability, social cohesion, and mobility. Atlanta’s strategy recognizes that the city has world-class colleges and universities, which are an enormous resource to enhancing the city’s resilience. One of the actions within Atlanta’s strategy is to host a resilient infrastructure design competition among the city’s colleges and universities around resilient street design. As such, Ted Turner Drive represents an opportunity to transform a city space into a truly resilient corridor. The purpose is to transform the 1.4 mile stretch of Ted Turner drive into a gateway to downtown that showcases inviting urban space with resilience values as defined by the City through the 100RC strategy process. TED TURNER DRIVE HISTORY AND CONTEXT In 2015, the Atlanta City Council passed legislation to rename a portion of historic Spring Street to “Ted Turner Drive” in honor of notable Atlanta resident, media mogul, conservationist and philanthropist Ted Turner, and his positive and enduring impact on the city. As such, the Challenge serves as an opportunity to engage local college and university students to share their vision of how resilient street design could shape the future of Atlanta. The improvements to Ted Turner Drive will inspire both residents and visitors of the city to be more environmentally conscious, add value to the city’s sustainability profile, and serve as a lasting symbol of Atlanta’s progress. This resilient initiative aligns with the City of Atlanta initiatives -- Resilient Atlanta, Green Infrastructure Master Plan, Atlanta City Design, and Renew Atlanta Bond & TSPLOST. The goal is to turn Ted Turner Drive into a model of sustainability and resilience street and sidewalk design, creating replicability for future city infrastructure projects. Ted Turner Drive is a minor arterial running north-south through the heart of Atlanta’s downtown central business district connecting to I-75/I-85 (the Connector) at each end. On the southern
end of the corridor from Whitehall Street to Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, Ted Turner Drive has two-way operations with two lanes in each direction. North of Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard to Ivan Allen Jr. Boulevard, Ted Turner Drive operates as one-way with four northbound lanes. A portion of Ted Turner Drive, in the area commonly referred to as the “Gulch”, from approximately Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to Marietta Street is elevated on structure (bridge). The corridor has a mix of land uses and a significant amount of impervious surface in the area. Ted Turner Drive is located within the the Atlanta Downtown Improvement District (Central Atlanta Progress), a public-private partnership that strives to create a livable environment for Downtown Atlanta through development of plans, provisions of services, and implementation of infrastructure projects. II. Goals & Parameters The competition calls for specific designs and ideas to enhance Ted Turner Drive. However, a successful proposal should also connect the transportation corridor to the larger goals of the City as it works to become more resilient and livable. Successful proposals will include design interventions that generate high impact, foster a sense of place, and mitigate environmental challenges like water, heat stress and air quality. Successful designs will turn the following list of challenges into opportunities. Designs should address as many of the issues below as possible. ● Environment - Stormwater management, water retention, heat mitigation, greenery, indigenous flora, recycling/waste reduction, energy ● Mobility - Alternative, low energy transportation ● Health - Active design to encourage health/exercise ● Social cohesion - Active public space, cultural relevance, designing for diversity Resilience elements could include green infrastructure, solar charging, electric and/or autonomous vehicles, bicycle/pedestrian facilities, LED lighting, green materials, and tree canopy cover. As community engagement and equity is a core value of the City, it is critical that these components are incorporated into the program as well. The submitted designs should have an implementing budget of approximately $5-7 million. Alternatively, proposals can offer a phased plan in which the first phase has this implementing budget, with a structure for utilizing future funds to complete the project. III. Process & Timeline 1) Kickoff (January 27): The competition will kick off with a day-long event of learning about urban resilience, work that is already being done in the city as it relates to 2
community input and resilience, as well as inspiration for what’s possible regarding mobility, green infrastructure, and urban design. Student teams will be matched with mentors and will get time to plan out their partnership for the semester. 2) Research Stage (Jan 29 - March 9) Under guidance of university professors, students will undergo a research stage to understand the needs of the community, stakeholders, and surrounding businesses. They can use research methodologies such as surveys, observation, interviews, mapping, and literature/plan review. This research will begin to inform their thinking about their approach to design and the opportunities for interventions in the corridor. 3) Research Submission & Design Opportunity Submission (March 9) To move forward into the next stage of the competition, students must submit proposals that incorporate the citizen input, critical topics, city goals, and research learnings. The proposal will outline their approach to design for the next phase of work. 4) Design Stage (March 19 - April 13): Students will have four weeks to create a design based on the design opportunity they submitted on March 9th. Students will build on their initial ideas and create a detailed and implementable design that addresses and incorporates citizen input, critical topics, city goals, and research learnings. 5) Public Engagement Opportunity (April 5): This will be held so that students can hear directly from local residents, businesses and stakeholders on their initial design ideas. This workshop will showcase each teams’ working designs and set up a forum for feedback. Students should demonstrate how this engagement informed and was incorporated into their final designs. 6) Final Design Presentation (April 20): At the end of the semester, each team will give a final presentation to the professors, each other, the city and the jury. Video submissions of design with a presentation may be necessary should Jury members be unable to attend. 7) Final design is chosen by the Jury (May 1) 8) Implementation of projects (Summer 2018 - ) IV. Maps & Technical Information This information about the corridor is meant to inform design. Design teams will have to show how they have utilized this knowledge in their design proposal. All relevant maps are included at the end of the design brief. 3
V. Evaluation The jury will be composed of representatives of the City of Atlanta, relevant private sector professions, and non-profit representatives. Design proposals will be judged based on the following criteria: ● Innovation and Creativity - Project utilizes approaches that address more than one challenge while harnessing forward thinking design or concepts. ● Design Effectiveness ○ Stormwater design and landscaping, incorporating natural infrastructure solutions to protect/restore watersheds and wildlife and reduce flooding ○ Alternative transportation options beyond single occupancy vehicles including walking, biking, and transit, as well as electric vehicle charging ○ Reduction of air emissions, energy usage, and increase in clean, renewable energy ● Economic Feasibility - Project recommendations can be implemented within the proposed budget of $5-7 million or proposals offer a phased plan in which the first phase has this implementing budget, with a structure for utilizing future funds to complete the project. ● Technical Feasibility - Project recommendations utilize design and construction methods and materials that are determined to be generally acceptable by the design and construction practices of the City of Atlanta. ● Community Engagement - Meaningful engagement of Atlanta communities including people of color and low-income residents, as well as visitors ● Equity - Project reduces disparities for the most marginalized while improving wellbeing for all Atlanta residents VI. Eligibility & Specifications ● Submit the online registration form with the requested information by Friday, January 26th. Each team must provide the contact information of all the participants. ● Submit a zip file containing: o A write-up of the concept behind the design proposal and an explanation of how it is connected to the research components of the brief. The written document should be submitted as a PDF in letter-size, portrait format, with margins of 1 inch on each side. Font should be Arial, size 11, 1.5 line spacing in text and one line between paragraphs. Document should be a maximum of 5 pages and should include the following information: Name of the project; name or authors of the project. 4
o Plans and renders, sized to Maximum A0, 300 dpi o Photographic material (optional) RAW or JPG format at 300 dpi o Video (optional) o Write-ups, plans, and renderings should be compressed and sent to rrhammond@atlantaga.gov. ● The City of Atlanta and Jury reserve the right to request additional documentation in order to verify the authenticity of the nominated works. ● The City of Atlanta and Jury reserves the right to disqualify candidacies that do not comply with the required documentation in a timely manner, or not adhere to the criteria outlined by this call. ● People with direct blood relationship with a member of the jury or the organizers may not participate in the competition. VIII. Legal The team member contestants, by virtue of accepting the terms of this competition, agree to cede to the organizers of the contest, as well as Rebuild by Design, The City of Atlanta, Central Atlanta Progress and 100 Resilient Cities, the right to edit, publish, distribute and reproduce in any form the content of your project upon visibility authoring and credits to members of project teams. Members of the winning teams, to accept the terms of this competition, consent to assign the rights to the idea presented in the contest organizers for further development, design and construction to be changed later, all without losing the original authorship and credit corresponding authors. Participation in the contest implies acceptance of all the provisions contained in the bases without an express declaration. IX. Prize Money A winner and finalist will be determined by the Jury. The winning team will be awarded $2,500 and the finalist team will be awarded $500. X. Maps ● Location map (Ted Turner Dr from Whitehall St to Ivan Allen Jr Blvd) ● Existing land use, including greenspace 5
● Future land use ● Population density, with male to female ratio ● Travel to work, including mode choice ● Average weekday & Saturday traffic volumes ● Average weekday AM & PM peak traffic volumes ● Topography ● Impervious surfaces, including bridges/structures ● Combined stormwater drainage & sewer ● Stormwater and sewer utilities (north half of corridor) ● Stormwater and sewer utilities (south half of corridor) ● Programmed transportation projects X. The Organizing Committee The City of Atlanta Renew Atlanta Bond & TSPLOST Programs Atlanta Office of Resilience and Sustainability Central Atlanta Progress 100 Resilient Cities Rebuild by Design 6
You can also read