The State of Car Policies in Europe and Key Fleet Challenges - 2013-2014 Edition - GE Capital
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Foreword 2014 is upon us and with the New Year comes a sense of optimism. Broad economic data suggests that Europe is turning a corner and, within our industry, fleet managers look to be starting the year on an optimistic note as well. This is highlighted in our first State of the Car Policy Report. A vast majority of respondents from our survey – 80% to be precise – expect their fleets to either grow or remain stable over the next two years. Likewise, over three quarters of respondents told us they are looking to expand their fleet into new countries, as they aim to take part in the fast growth of emerging markets such as Russia, Turkey and Brazil. These findings point to promising signs of confidence returning to the market. To be sure though, there are still critical issues to overcome, and we developed this report with this in mind. Our goal has been to identify the key challenges that global, European and local Fleet Managers currently face and benchmark how companies across Europe structure their car policies, in order to help them overcome these challenges. Indeed, with the first edition of the report, we are embarking on a year-long discussion entitled The Fleet Debate, which will look at the different aspects of the fleet management universe, providing managers with the opportunity to find best practices from across the industry and to engage with peers and opinion leaders to identify new ways to improve the efficiencies of their fleets. We are excited to see that the fleet industry is eager to engage in such a debate. Over 70 companies managing a cumulative 150,000+ vehicles took part in this survey, and leading fleet managers have also provided invaluable insights on the current environment which you will find in the pages of this report. We hope you enjoy The State of Fleet Policy report and join the Fleet Debate. Maurice Benisty, Chief Commercial Officer at GE Capital International
Contents Executive summary: 10 Key findings 2 Data and methodology 3 Section 1: The state of car policy 4 • By type of fleet: comparing personnel only and commercial and personnel car policies 5 • By fleet size: comparing large and small fleets 6 • By geographic region: comparing globally and locally managed fleets 7 Section 2: The three key challenges 9 • Driver behaviour 10 • Global fleet management 12 • Fuel management 13 The information materials and opinions contained in this document are for general information purposes only, are not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice, and should not be relied on or treated as a substitute for specific advice relevant to particular circumstances. Except as required by law, neither GE Capital EMEA Services Limited, nor its affiliated companies or businesses accept any responsibility and shall not be liable for any loss or damage whatsoever, whether in contract, tort (including negligence) or otherwise arising from reliance on the information, materials and opinions contained in this document. 1
10 Key findings 01. 02. Financing through an operating “Improving drivers behaviour” lease is the main funding method represents the top challenge for corporate companies fleet managers face (61% of respondents) 03. 04. 80% of the fleet managers expect 60% of respondents told us their their fleets to grow or remain fleet management is handled stable in the next 24 months internally 05. 06. The most common car allocation All firms surveyed stated they methods are: have fuel card solutions in place • Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) (25%) and 42% of them are looking for a • Fixed budget (21%) global solution 07. 08. Limited use of telematics (22%) 60% of respondents already for influencing drivers behaviour, operate on regional or global scale, currently mainly used in with 54% looking to further optimise combined fleets (personnel their global approach & commercial) 09. 10. Almost two thirds (62%) of Over three quarters (78%) of respondents told us they have respondents intend to expand their active CO2 restrictions in place. fleet into new countries. Russia, Most common restrictions are Turkey and Brazil are the most within 130-140 g/Km limits. anticipated new geographies 2
Data and methodology An online survey... 72 fleet managers responded to an online 150,000+ questionnaire structured to cover five categories: • Choice of car company cars managed across • Environment 72 • Fuel management • Insurance • Driver behaviour companies The responses were collected during October & November 2013. …with insights from experts Following the survey, a panel discussion was organized to debate the outcomes of the survey and gain further insights from leading European fleet managers. Robert Patrick MSD Luc Dendievel Regional Sourcing Manager at Merck, Sharp and Category Director Fleet EMEA at Johnson & Dohme (MSD) EMEA. Robert co-leads MSD’s fleet Johnson, Luc strives to optimise fleet management procurement, policies and operations for their at international level. In 2008, Luc won the Fleet 12,000 vehicle fleet in the EMEA region. In 2012, Europe Innovation award and, in 2013, he was Robert was co-winner of Fleet Europe’s International elected International Fleet Manager of the Year at Fleet Manager of the Year award. MSD is a leading the Fleet Europe Awards. Johnson & Johnson is a research-driven healthcare company. multinational medical devices, pharmaceutical and consumer goods manufacturer. Andy Leeden Paolo Penati Global Fleet Category Manager for AstraZeneca, European Sourcing Manager for the Stanley Black Andy is responsible for global fleet strategy, supplier & Decker group, Paolo is responsible of 4,800 management, development, procurement and vehicles to manage thought coordination of 20 local execution, covering more than 70 markets and fleet managers. Stanley Black & Decker is a global 20,000 vehicles. AstraZeneca is a global, innovation- manufacturer of hardworking, innovative, powerful driven, integrated biopharmaceutical company. industrial tools and household hardware. Structure of the report The report is structured in two main sections. • The first section outlines the key elements of a typical • The second section analyse the three key challenges fleet car policy and allows users to benchmark their own fleet managers are currently facing, related to driver behaviour, policies against others, depending on the type, size and global fleet management & fuel management scope of their fleet 3
Section 1: State of car policy: overview According to our respondents, the most typical car policy structure is funded through an operational lease, managed internally with TCO-driven allocation approach and active CO2 restrictions. Funding 47% Fleet managers are mainly funding their fleet Operational lease through operational lease. This funding solution is Fleet management used by almost half the companies we surveyed. The largest difference in funding methods is Outright purchase between the personnel-only and combined fleets. 20 % Finance lease 16% 17% Fleet management The majority of companies surveyed are managing 23% their entire fleets internally. However, the larger Internal management and more global the fleet becomes, the more often companies look to outsource their fleet management activities. 60% Outsourcing Partial outsourcing 17% Allocation strategy The most common fleet allocation strategy is based on TCO, followed closely by fixed 25% TCO driven budget approach. TCO driven is a strategy most 21% Fixed budget commonly used for large and global fleet, as well 17% Car list as for combined (commercial and personnel cars) 11% Car list with option policy, whereas for personnel car fleet the fixed 13% Environment budget is more commonly used. 13% Others Environment The majority of companies surveyed have active CO2 restrictions in place. The companies having such restrictions in place have global and large fleets. 38% No active CO2 restrictions in place 62% Active CO2 restrictions in place Driver behaviour Currently about half of the fleet managers surveyed have programmes in place to influence the No programs in place behaviour of their drivers. Such programmes are aimed at influencing less common in personnel only fleets. “Influencing driver behaviour driver behaviour” has been highlighted as the #1 Programs in place challenge for fleet managers. We find the number of companies with such programmes is likely to 51% aimed at influencing driver behaviour increase over the coming years. 4
State of car policy: by fleet type Significant differences exist in how a car policy is structured to manage personnel only or combined (commercial and personnel) fleets. Combined cars Personnel only cars Commercial and personnel cars Funding 60% Taking out an operational lease remains the preferred funding solution for fleet managers Operational lease with combined cars and personnel cars policies. 41% Fleet management However, for the combined car policy, fleet Outright purchase managers often use more than one solution. 22% 19% 19% Finance lease 16% 12% 12% Fleet management We find that combined cars are mainly managed internally by the fleet managers. However, for 25% 20% Internal management personnel cars, the fleet management type is more differentiated. Here, the chosen management type 7% 67% 54% Outsourcing is heavily influenced by the company’s strategy, 26% Partial outsourcing with the majority choosing to outsource or manage internally. Allocation strategy The allocation strategy is specific to the type of fleet used. TCO-driven is a key allocation strategy 17% 28% 21% TCO driven for all fleet and remains the first one for combined 12% 24% Fixed budget car policy. While the most common allocation 17% 16% Car list strategy for personnel cars is with a fixed budget. 11% 11% Car list with options 13% 18% Environment 13% 10% Others Environment Fleet managers set up more active CO2 restrictions No active CO2 in personnel car policies than in commercial & 41% restrictions in place personnel cars. For both policies, companies state 55% the maximum CO2 allowed emission at 140g/km Active CO2 45% 59% restrictions in place Driver behaviour No programs in place aimed at influencing “Influencing driver behaviour by providing drivers driver behaviour with programs” is an initiative more developed Programs in place for commercial & personnel car policies than for aimed at influencing personnel car policies. In this case, companies have driver behaviour developed driving programs such as e-training. 45% 55% 59% 41% 5
State of car policy: by fleet size Car policies reflect the differences between the size and the complexity of managed fleets. This is most evident between small and large fleet policies. Small fleet Large fleet (0-250 cars) (>2000 cars) Funding 43% 41% Taking out an operational lease is the most used Operational lease funding solution for fleet managers of any fleet size. Fleet management However for commercial & personnel car policies 24% Outright purchase particularly, smaller fleets are more likely to use 21% 23% two types of funding, rather than a sole financing 14% 17% 17% Finance lease arrangement. Fleet management 6% We find small fleets are mainly managed internally. However, for large fleets management is more 11% Internal management 35% broadly spread across the three management options, with internal management being the most 83% 38% Outsourcing Partial outsourcing prevalent. 27% Allocation strategy 17% 30% TCO driven Managers of large fleets prefer to allocate cars with a TCO-driven approach. However, 23% 13% Fixed budget 19% 16% Car list the picture for small fleets is more fragmented as fleet managers use fixed 8% 13% Car list with options budget, TCO driven, car list and environment 15% 17% Environment options at approximately the same rate. 16% 11% Others Environment 65% of large fleet respondents have active CO2 35% No active CO2 restrictions in place. While only 41% have this restrictions in place initiative in place for small fleets. The average CO2 59% Active CO2 emission allowed for all fleet sizes is 140g/Km. 41% 65% restrictions in place Driver behaviour No programs in place aimed at influencing Small fleets are developing more programs in their driver behaviour car policy to influence behaviour of their drivers in Programs in place comparison to the large fleets. aimed at influencing driver behaviour 39% 61% 46% 54% 6
State of car policy: by geographic region Differences in car policies are also dependent on the geographic scope of a fleet. Local fleet Global fleet Specific to one country Centralised policy for multiple countries Funding 48% Taking out an operational lease is the most used 44% Operational lease funding solution for all fleet managers, regardless of their geographic scope. Fleet management 22% 20% 21% Outright purchase 18% 13% 12% Finance lease Fleet management 10% Fleet managers operating localised fleets are more 7% Internal management likely to manage them internally. Those managers 37% operating a global fleet policy are likely to take a more differentiated approach. 83% 37% Outsourcing Partial outsourcing 26% Allocation strategy Fleet managers who operate on a single 17% 28% TCO driven country basis are mainly allocating cars with a 28% 12% Fixed budget fixed budget. However, for global fleet,s ‘TCO- 17% 21% Car list driven’ allocated cars is the more prevalent 11% 7% Car list with options approach. 13% 16% Environment 13% 16% Others Environment 67% of large fleet managers operating with 33% No active CO2 restrictions in place a global car policy currently have active CO2 55% restrictions in place. In comparison, only 45% of Active CO2 large fleets operating with a local car policy have this function in place. Across all fleet sizes, the 45% 67% restrictions in place average CO2 emission allowed is 140g/Km. No programs in place Driver behaviour aimed at influencing driver behaviour Both local and global fleet are developing Programs in place programs in their car policy in order to influence aimed at influencing driver behaviour. driver behaviour 48% 52% 47% 53% 7
Driver Behaviour “The safety training is the most effective solution for changing driver behaviour” Luc Dendievel, Johnson & Johnson Global Fleet Management “Global policy approach is a challenge faced by fleet managers” Paolo Penati, Stanley Black & Decker Managing Fuel “It is very complex to setup international Fuel programmes. There are limited options available in the global markets for consolidating actual fuel data” Robert Patrick, MSD 8
Section Two Three key challenges According to the fleet managers participating in the survey the key challenges needing to be addressed in the following year are: Out of the total of respondents: 61% 54% 48% are concerned are looking to want to improve their about driver optimise their fuel management behaviour global fleet approach Out of this group: Out of this group: Out of this group: • 4 1% are looking to • 7 0% are looking for an • 4 2% are willing to reduce damages and international coverage and have a fuel card with accidents by influencing centralisation of policies international coverage driver behaviour • 1 3% would like to have • 3 8% would like to • 3 0% are aiming to reduce more expertise and manage fuel costs and CO2 consumption knowledge of local markets track fuel consumption 9
Driver behaviour Influencing drivers to reduce damages and accidents is the most common challenge 61 % of the fleet managers Share of companies with active programmes in place for influencing driver behaviour, by fleet type Global fleet 53% surveyed are concerned about driver behaviour European fleet 42% Local fleet 52% Large fleet 54% However only 36% 49% Medium fleet Small fleet 61% have initiatives in place aimed at influencing driver behaviour Personnel cars only 41% Small fleet and combined personnel & commercial car policies are the largest implementers of programmes targeted at influencing driver behaviour. Personnel & commercial cars 55% Is telematics a solution for influencing driver behaviour? FLEET THE DEBATE 2014 MSD Do you use telematics to monitor and influence the driving behaviour of your fleet? Johnson and Johnson is providing the drivers with an online training program based on safety. According to Luc Dendievel, the E-driving training is the most effective solution for changing driver behaviour and Yes enhancing safety on the road. According to Robert Patrick, from MSD, there is little point in having telematics if there is no strategy or No resource allocated to analyse the data or a programme 22% 78% of action to utilise that data to improve driver behaviour and increase operational efficiency. 10
Driver behaviour Influencing driver behaviour to reduce CO2 emission is a key objective for fleet managers 61 % of the fleet managers are Does your fleet have 39% active CO2 restrictions in looking for ways to influence place today? driver behaviour to reduce the 61% CO2 emission No Yes Fleet managers are looking to reduce their fleet What is the maximum allowed CO2 emission CO2 emission by implementing CO2 restrictions within your policy? (g/km) in their car policy. 61% of fleet managers have already implemented active CO2 restrictions with an average capping of 140g/Km. >180 11% Additional measurements such as engine 150-160 15% reduction have been implemented for limiting CO2 emission. 130-140 63% 100-120 11% Does your fleet have other active Case Study measurements to limit emissions/ pollution in place today? Local UK fleet: 800 cars, 300 cash takers Challenge: The Customer asked GE Capital to conduct a study Engine reduction 58% to optimise car policy by providing a tax and cost efficient car option to reduce CO2 emission. Imposed fuel 38% Solution: We designed and introduced a new policy for users where all cars were put on a contract purchase product and would automatically have CO2 emissions reduced from Limit on fuel consumption 27% 120g/km to 110g/Km. Results: The customer was able to claim capital allowances Gearbox 14% on the fleet (as they were using a contract purchase product) ensuring 100% tax relief in year 1, due to the lower CO2 emissions. This resulted in a saving of €24 per month per car, Sootfiller 7% while the car choice for the employee did not diminish. 11
Global fleet management Centralising policy and processes for multiple countries is a growing focus for fleet managers 54 % of the fleet managers surveyed Case Study Pharmaceutical Company 20,100 cars in 18 countries Challenge: The customer engaged GE Capital to address the challenge of having a wide are looking to optimise their global portfolio of OEMs and models on its company car list. fleet approach – with their top Solution: • Benchmarked OEMs and models choice against peers in priority to have a centralised policy their industry. with international coverage • Identified costs reduction by focusing on fewer OEMs and models for their global policy. • Negotiation with OEMs for developing global contracts with the best pricing solution. Results: GE Capital consultants delivered over €14MM in 60% of fleet managers surveyed are operating on a European or global scale with 53% savings through a reduction of OEM’s from 13 to 4 on a global level. single or multiple suppliers. Based on the results of the survey, a global fleet manager is more frequently dealing with three On what scale do you operate your fleets? or more leasing providers across the Globe. Additionally, global fleet generally allow for Global 26% more than 5 car manufacturers in their policies European 33% whereas, local fleet allow between 1 to 4 car manufacturers. Local 40% Number of partners by geographic scope FLEET THE DEBATE 2014 How many fleet leasing providers do you have? 17% 19% 1 Supplier According to Paolo Penati at Stanley Black 23% 2 Suppliers & Decker, global policy is a challenge faced 61% 22% 38% 19% 38% 3 Suppliers by most fleet managers. Their global policy 23% 24% 8% More than is generally centralised and managed by a 3 suppliers Global Fleet Council, however in order to have Global scope European scope Local scope a tailored European-specific approach, Stanley Black & Decker has established a European How many car manufacturers does your policy allow? Fleet Council as well. 8% 17% 11% 1 Manufacturer 28% 29% 32% However, some countries in the CEE region 2-4 Manufacturers need specific, stand-alone policies. The 61% 46% 36% 5-9 Manufacturers difference of leasing solutions, manufacturers 22% 17% 21% 10 Manufacturers offered, taxation and regulation across the and more various regions have to be supported by Global scope European scope Local scope different suppliers. 12
Managing fuel Having a single fuel card solution covering all markets remains a challenge 100 % Of fleet managers use fuel National Does the fuel card have national International or international coverage? cards in their fleet policy 54% of fleet managers are trying to improve their approach to fuel management, 62% 38% with their top priority being to have a fuel card National International with international coverage Can the fuel card handle only one gas station Based on the responses, all participants are using fuel cards network or multiple networks? in their fleet policy. 62 % of the fleet managers have national fuel cards for their fleet and 38% have already implemented international fuel cards. All networks 24% 39% Moreover, we find fleet managers allocate their gas-station 39% 34% 1 network coverage in relation to their fleet scope. Those managers 56% 43% 41% Limited number operating local fleets are more likely to use one network only, of gas stations 6% whereas those managing global fleets typically have a fuel card 17% covering multiple networks. Global scope European scope Local scope FLEET THE DEBATE 2014 Andy Leeden, Global Fleet Category Manager at AstraZeneca: “Having a single fuel card with a global or even regional coverage would be an ideal solution. When fuel typically represents 30% of TCO; it is a considerable cost. A unique fuel card could reduce fuel pricing, management time and improve reporting and compliance. However, to my knowledge there is currently no solution on the market, offering one fuel card with global or multi region coverage.” 13
Managing fuel Tracking fuel consumption is a significant cost challenge Managing fuel is always considered as a Do you provide fuel for private use of the vehicle? challenging topic. 85% Yes 38% of the fleet managers are looking to improve fuel management for their fleet. 15% No Based on the results, 72% of fleet managers monitor the actual fuel consumption of their car fleet drivers in order to optimise fuel management. This process is largely used for local and Case Study small fleets. Do you monitor the actual fuel consumption Fully outsourced fleet, 200 cars, 18 countries of your car fleet drivers? Challenge: A GE Capital customer had been concerned about the impact on fuel costs while their cars were used for No Yes personal use. Global fleet 61% 39% Solutions: • Introduced a whole life cost policy for improving the Local fleet 79% 21% average miles per gallon by 20% as well as reducing fuel costs Large fleet 69% 31% • Established a cost and tax efficient method of providing the private fuel benefits. Small fleet 82% 18% • Analysed each individual driver’s levels of private mileage and determined individual free private fuel levels. Personnel cars only 71% 29% Results: GE Capital consultants delivered annual cost savings of € 281,000 savings and a reduction of 81% of private Personnel & commercial cars fuel costs. 72% 28% FLEET MSD THE DEBATE 2014 According to Robert Patrick from MSD, it is very fuel consumption is a key variable in analysing Total challenging to setup International Fuel programmes. Cost of Ownership of fleets, and that in making vehicle There are limited options available in the global selections fleet managers fully understand expected markets for consolidating actual fuel data. Spend on fuel costs for differing vehicle options. a global level and differing taxation treatments for According to Luc Dendievel from Johnson & Johnson, fuel across markets, further complicates the analysis. the potential solution for tracking fuel consumption In some instances it can take a lot of manpower to would be to implement a telematics solution in every track real fuel consumption, therefore in a number car. The provided data would track the actual fuel of markets MSD focuses on theoretical consumption, consumption for each driver and therefore some whilst in others real data can be tracked. The primary tailored solutions can be implemented in order to focus in managing fuel costs remains ensuring that reduce fuel costs. 14
Looking to the future 80 % Of the fleet managers expect Share of companies expecting their fleet to remain stable or increase, by type of fleet their fleet to remain stable or increase over the next 24 months Global fleet 50% 39% Local fleet 41% 38% 46% 34% 20% Large fleet 38% 38% Remain stable Increase Decrease Small fleet 59% 35% The majority of fleet managers expect their fleet size to remain stable over the next 24 months. Global fleet and personnel & commercial cars are expected to Personnel cars only 41% 26% see the highest growth over the next 24 months. Moreover, 94% of small fleet managers expect their fleet to remain stable or increase. Personnel & commercial cars 55% 39% Additionally, global fleet managers expect their responsibilities to Remain stable Increase expand to new geographies. FLEET 81 % THE DEBATE 2014 Of the fleet managers plan to expand their fleet business towards new countries. The top priorities are: Andy Leeden, Global Fleet Category Manager, AstraZeneca, said, “Globally the fleet size will remain stable, but the trend is that the fleet is moving. It’s moving eastwards. There will be a decline in Western Europe and North America, but growth in the emerging markets. Our fleet follows the demand for our medicines.” 50% 48% 36% Russia Turkey Brazil 15
We hope you found the State of Car Policy Report informative & useful for your involvement with Fleet management. This report forms part of a wider range of activity from ‘The Fleet Debate’ – a community of industry discussion, peer debates & best practice sharing centred around Fleet Management. Throughout the year, GE Capital will be arranging a series of webinars, roundtables & workshops with business leaders & peers to discuss current challenges, the evolving market, and to debate the future of Fleet Management; in addition to supporting an online hub for accessing useful Fleet insights & best practices. FLEET THE DEBATE 2014 Join the Fleet Debate If you would like to know more about The Fleet Debate please email fleet.debate@ge.com or keep your eyes on the Fleet press for upcoming debates & insights. © 2013 General Electric Company. All rights reserved. Neither this publication nor any part of it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of General Electric Company. GE Capital EMEA Services Limited. Registered Address: The Ark, 201 Talgarth Road, London W6 8BJ, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales No. 00244759
You can also read