THE RCCI ENGINE Breakthrough Fuel Efficiency, Low NOx & Soot Emissions - Investing in research, making a difference.
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
THE RCCI ENGINE Breakthrough Fuel Efficiency, Low NOx & Soot Emissions Investing in research, makingInvesting a difference. in research, making a difference.
To Compete in the world’s fastest growing markets, engine manufac- turers and fleet operators need to meet increasingly stringent emissions require- ments while also improving fuel efficiency. Fleet-wide efficiency goals and the need to reduce fuel consumption to meet current and future emission and efficiency mandates also reinforce the demand for a new generation of engine technologies. Figure 1: Modified diesel intake manifold A portfolio of recently patented engine technolo- with port fuel injectors. gies developed by a team from the University of Wisconsin–Madison Engine Research Center led by Laboratory demonstrate that engines utilizing these Director Rolf Reitz solves a host of environmental technologies attain exceptional fuel efficiency. The and efficiency challenges by offering dramatic re- test engine has achieved an unprecedented 60 ductions in nitrogen oxide and soot emissions while percent gross indicated efficiency1 in the laboratory boosting fuel economy. The technologies are now (corresponding to a diesel fuel energy equivalent available for licensing through the Wisconsin Alum- gross indicated specific fuel consumption of 141 ni Research Foundation, which patents and licenses g/kW-hr) with nitrogen oxide and soot emissions discoveries arising from UW–Madison research. significantly below current limits in the U.S., EU and Japan. (Fig. 2) Called reactivity controlled compression igni- tion, or RCCI, the base technology uses multiple Additional research published by the International injections of differing fuel types to optimize Journal of Engine Research points to a 100-fold combustion phasing, duration and magnitude. reduction in nitrogen oxide and a 10-fold reduction Laboratory experiments performed at the Engine in soot when compared with a conventional diesel Research Center and at Oak Ridge National combustion engine.2 (Fig. 3) Figure 2: Comparison of light-duty RCCI Figure 3: Comparison of heavy-duty RCCI and conventional combustion. and conventional combustion. 1. S plitter, D.A., Wissink, M., DelVescovo, D., and Reitz, R.D., “RCCI Engine Operation Towards 60% Thermal Efficien- cy,” SAE Paper 2013-01-0279, 2013. 2. K okjohn, S.L., Hanson, R.M., Splitter, D.A., and Reitz, R.D., “Fuel Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI): A Pathway to Controlled High-Efficiency Clean Combustion,” International Journal of Engine Research, Special Is- sue on Fuel Efficiency, Vol. 12, pp. 209-226, doi:10.1177/1468087411401548, 2011. Investing in research, making a difference.
Figure 4 The RCCI technology portfolio (warf.org/RCCI) comprises nine related patents and patent pending technologies that enable the unique in-cylinder fuel blending, stratification and compression combustion process. WARF seeks partners to license and develop the RCCI technologies. • P100054US01 – Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Engine; • P100054US02 – Fuel Reactivity Method Cuts Diesel Engine Emissions; • P110092US01 – Engine Combustion Control at Low Loads with Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Combustion; • P110320US01 – Improved Compression Ignition Combustion in Rotary Engines for Higher Efficiency and Lower Pollutant Emissions; • P07342US – Adaptive Fuel Injection Method Cuts Diesel Engine Emissions; • P06042US – Valve Method Cuts Engine Emissions, Boosts Combustion; • P03152US – Variable Valve Actuation Method to Enhance Combustion and Reduce Engine Emissions; • P01320US – Reducing Emissions and Controlling Combustion Phasing in HCCI Engines; and • P01108US – Use of Multiple Injections of Increasing Pressure to Reduce Diesel Engine Emissions. “Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition is a new and superior way to burn fuel in internal combustion engines. It improves fuel use efficiency and reduces carbon dioxide emission. Compared with a conven- tional diesel it reduces nitric oxides emission 100-fold and soot 10-fold. Two fuels with differing reactivity are used. The lower reactivity fuel, e.g., gasoline, is injected early and is too dilute (lean) to self-ignite even at the high compression needed for high efficiency. The higher reactivity fuel, e.g., diesel, is injected later but early enough that mixing has time to prevent soot formation in locally rich cool regions and NOx formation in locally stoichiometric hot regions. The ratio of the two fuels provides an important control parameter to enable the engine to work optimally over ranges of speed, load and ambient temperature. The level of understanding that made this RCCI discovery possible is the direct result of decades of thoughtful interaction between evolving theory and experiment by Professor Rolf Reitz, faculty and students at the Engine Research Center at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. Future engines, especially those required for long haul of freight by road, river, rail or ocean, will compete to provide lowest cost of ownership while meeting minimum greenhouse gas and other emissions. RCCI provides an opportunity for a substantial advance in the way engines work their magic for the benefit of the world community.” – John Clarke, B.Sc., CEng, MIMechE, Fellow SAE, Associate ASME Caterpillar Research (Retired) Investing in research, making a difference.
RCCI Technologies offer end-to-end benefits for engine manufacturers, fleet owners and other engine applications With the ability to meet the world’s most restrictive regulatory standards while providing dramatic cost savings in fuel and after-treatment systems, the RCCI engine and its associated technologies promise a broad range of benefits for engine manufacturers; fleet owners; and producers of transportation, utility and auxiliary power equipment. • Benefits for engine manufacturers: Implementation of the RCCI technology portfolio enables compliance with U.S., EU and Japanese regulatory frameworks through 2016 while providing a basis for continued reductions. The technologies offer substantial savings in overall engine cost and weight due to significantly reduced requirements for injection pressure and engine heat rejection while lowering the reliance on NOx and soot after-treatment systems Figure 5: Step load transient emissions of and maintaining standard frame and engine RCCI vs. conventional diesel combustion (CDC). compartment metrics. • Benefits for fleet owners: • Benefits across multiple engine markets: The RCCI engine technologies support increased The technologies apply to automobiles; light-, fleet efficiency through added fuel flexibility medium- and heavy-duty trucks and buses; (e.g., RCCI allows the use of natural gas at high off-road vehicles (agricultural, construction, substitution rates), improved fuel economy and industrial); locomotives; generator sets and lowered reliance on costly after-treatment systems. marine vessels including large oceangoing ships t RCCI operaHon is possible for a large fracHon The technologies also reduce operator input and fleet maintenance and lower the cost of ownership racHon oof f eeac ac (propulsion and auxiliary power). by reducing or eliminating the use of diesel exhaust fluid (DEF). Fuel Fuel Drive Drive Total Total Dies Die economy economy Drive Drive cycle cycle cycle cycle by by diesel diesel duri dur RCCI RCCI benefit benefit by distance by distance time time fuel fuel RC RC ngine ngine Drive Cycle results (relative (%) results (relative %) %) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (% (% conomy conomy ghway UDDSCity UDDS +14 +14 72 72 55 55 56 56 41 4 ghway HwyHWFET < 60MPH +15 88 86 44 37 HWFET +15 88 86 44 3 US06 US06 Aggressive +8 +8 66 66 56 56 66 66 31 3 NYCC Low Speed Stop-and-Go NYCC +13 +13 69 69 36 36 65 65 43 4 Figure 6: Estimated RCCI-enabled engine increases in fuel economy over city and highway drive cycles (Curran et al. SAE 2014-01-1324). Investing in research, making a difference.
RCCI Technologies advance state of the art in engine design The RCCI engine and associated technologies over- • Reduced engine costs: come current diesel limitations by reducing both NOx The expensive high pressure diesel injector and soot while also improving fuel economy. This is can be replaced by a relatively inexpensive accomplished within the cylinder at lower injection low pressure injector. Additionally, the RCCI pressure and temperature, thereby reducing the need engine technologies achieve soot and NOx for expensive NOx and soot exhaust after-treatment control within the combustion chamber with the systems and high pressure injection systems. addition of an inexpensive port fuel injector for a diesel engine or by replacing the spark The Advantages are Dramatic plug with an injector for a spark ignition engine. • Fuel savings of up to 20 percent: • Reduced reliance on costly after-treat- The unique fuel injection system and highly effi- ment systems and fluids: cient combustion process improves performance Test results confirm that RCCI enables compliance for all engine uses, with fuel savings of up to 20 with today’s most stringent EPA emissions percent as compared to conventional diesel en- regulations, in-cylinder, with reduced need gines. The multifuel system uses a combination for NOx or soot after-treatment systems and of two or more fuels with varying reactivities, chemicals. In addition, the system is compatible e.g., diesel with gasoline, natural gas or ethanol. with existing exhaust gas recirculation and after-treatment methods that would provide for • NOx reductions without after-treatment: further emission reductions. The RCCI technologies reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides through lower and more • End-to-end benefits: uniform combustion temperatures. The result From lower engine costs to reduced fuel is an overall reduction in NOx emissions with consumption to savings from fuel flexibility and reduced need for expensive after-treatment reduced need for DEF and other operator inputs, systems that use nitrogen oxide catalysts the RCCI technologies offer dramatic, measurable and diesel exhaust fluid. (Fig. 3) advantages. At the same time, the documented emission reductions ensure regulatory compli- • Soot reductions without after-treatment: ance while signaling a commitment to superior Rather than injecting a single fuel charge late environmental performance for manufacturers in the cycle, the engine employs multiple charges and fleet owners alike. injected very early in the cycle to generate low soot emissions during the combustion process. (Fig. 3) “Diesel engines have long been recognized for their fuel efficiency. However, while substantial progress has been made in reducing their emission of NOx and particulate matter, the remaining emissions of these criteria pollutants continue to be a source of environmental concern and are facing ever tighter emission regulations. The RCCI engine uses advanced, low temperature combustion techniques combined with multiple injections of a high and a low reactivity fuel at varying pressures to further reduce emissions and achieve even greater fuel efficiency. RCCI represents an important path forward in the effort to optimize the performance of diesel combustion systems.” – Dennis Siebers, Engine Combustion Research Program Manager Sandia National Laboratories Combustion Research Facility Investing in research, making a difference.
Cell 2, 6-7, Engine 6-9, 6-10, Condition: 2300GM engine rpm, 4.2 bar BMEP* RCCI post-DOC emissions 0.014 +- 0.001 g/hp-hr Engine-out PCCI and 0.14 Diesel Particle Mass Emissions (g/hp-hr) RCCI mass were similar Reduction by DOC inOxidation magnitude but 0.12 Conventional Diesel: 30 ± 6% The DOC reduced PM Diesel PCCI: 9 ± 18% Catalysts mass by 50% with 0.10 Dual-Fuel RCCI: 47 ± 9% RCCI vs. 30% with (DOC) CDC further and 10%reduce with 0.08 PCCI particulates. DOC was effective for 0.06 RCCI despite PCCI Engine-out lower and exhaust temperature 0.04 RCCI mass were similar in magnitude. However, 0.02 the DOC further reduced 0.00 PM mass by 47% with Engine Engine Post Engine 0 1 Out Post 2 DOC 3 Out 4 DOC 5 Out Post 6 DOC 7 RCCI vs. only 30% with Conventional Diesel Diesel PCCI Dual-Fuel RCCI CDC and 9% with PCCI. RCCI post-DOC emissions 0.014 ± 0.001 g/hp-hr DOC was effective for iB4.4),8"C')0"/)R^;JcQgRI
The RCCI Engine and PFI DI Intake Exhaust associated technologies provide a broad range of engine power and torque char- acteristics suitable for automobiles; light-, medium- and heavy-duty trucks and buses; off-road vehicles (agricultural, construction, industrial); locomotives; generator sets and marine vessels including large oceangoing Port injection of low Direct injection of high ships (propulsion and auxiliary power). reactivity fuel, i.e., gasoline/ reactivity fuel, i.e., diesel/B20 E85 (orange) (blue) Engine-size scaling relationships are used to scale fuel injection parameters across engine platforms. Figure 10: Schematic of cylinder injection and fuel Differences in compression ratio, engine speed distribution (Curran et al. SAE 2014-01-1324). and operating conditions are accommodated with adjustments to the fuel blend. The technologies also are applicable to rotary engines. • Variable valve actuation: In a traditional four-stroke engine, intake and ex- haust valves open to allow air into the combustion Control of fuel reactivity and stratification chamber and again to release exhaust gases fol- combine for a high-performance system lowing combustion. A fixed geometry and phasing The RCCI engine portfolio integrates important mechanical camshaft opens and closes the valves. advances in combustion phasing and duration control to achieve its impressive performance profile. Newer technology called variable valve actuation Key innovations include the use of fuels with differing (VVA) uses independently controlled camshaft reactivities delivered through multiple injections to profile and phasing to open and close valves achieve optimum fuel reactivity stratification. This at optimal times during the combustion cycle. enhanced combustion process improves performance, even at low loads or while idling. Gasoline PFI Fuel Rail Fuel • Multiple injections at varying pressures: System Port Fuel The engine cycle starts with a pulse of lower Injectors reactivity fuel (e.g., gasoline, natural gas or Diesel ethanol) during the early phase of the compression Fuel stroke. This fuel pulse is timed to mix with intake System DI Fuel Rail air so that it is too “lean” to produce appreciable Diesel soot or nitrogen oxides upon combustion, but Injectors Cooler ERG not so lean that it creates significant amounts of unburned hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide. Smaller pulses of higher reactivity fuel (e.g., diesel, biodiesel or additive) then provide a locally richer fuel mixture for effective autoignition. The Turbo timing and volume of these pulses are optimized to control the combustion event to maximize efficiency. CAC Exhaust The use of varying injection pressures also aids ignition and cuts emissions by introducing further Intake Air control over the combustion process. The first Figure 11: Schematic of engine injection and fuel injection arrives at a lower pressure followed by distribution (Curran et al. SAE 2013-01-0289). subsequent injections at higher pressures. Investing in research, making a difference.
Low = Prevents Autoignition Fuel Reactivity High = Promotes Autoignition Figure 12: Combustion mode spectrum (Curran 2013 U.S. DOE Annual Merit Review). The RCCI engine can exploit VVA to introduce air • Enhanced performance at low loads: into the combustion chamber at optimal times Many advanced engines provide high output during the compression and power strokes to and efficient fuel use, but performance declines control the combustion process. markedly at low loads or while idling. The RCCI engine overcomes this obstacle through stratified • Improved compression ignition: fuel reactivity and a throttle upstream from the An initial injection of a lower reactivity fuel is fol- intake port to maintain the optimal fuel/air mixture. lowed by injection of a higher reactivity fuel. This fuel reactivity stratification allows combustion in The technology ensures low emissions and enhanced the chamber without use of a spark source. fuel economy across a wide range of engine loads. It can be combined with exhaust gas recirculation and exhaust after-treatment strategies. Single Fuel Operation with Additive RCCI can operate using a single fuel plus a small tank of cetane improving additive. As depicted in figure 13, RCCI is able to use port fuel injection of gasoline and direct injection of the same gasoline doped with a small quantity of additive, e.g., ethylhexyl nitrate (EHN). Results show that while there is a slight increase in NOx emissions using the additive, they are still lower than regulated levels. Additionally, Additive soot emissions are lower and thermal efficiency is Tank Fuel Tank increased by using the additive as compared to operation with diesel fuel. (Fig. 14) uch an operating strategy would only require S refilling the additive at typical oil change intervals. Based on a 50 mpg estimate, a 3 gallon tank of additive would require refilling every 10,000 miles, which is less than DEF refilling intervals and amounts. Figure 13: Single fuel plus additive RCCI setup. E10 + E10/EHN 0.3 E10 + Diesel Fuel 0.006 52 50 NOx (g/kW-h) Soot (g/kW-h) 0.2 0.004 48 GIE (%) 46 0.1 0.002 44 42 0.0 0.000 40 5.5 bar IMEP 9 bar IMEP 5.5 bar IMEP 9 bar IMEP 5.5 bar IMEP 9 bar IMEP Figure 14: Emissions and performance comparison of single fuel plus additive RCCI (E10 + E10/EHN) and dual-fuel RCCI (E10 + Diesel Fuel) (Kaddatz et al. SAE 2012-01-1110). Investing in research, making a difference.
The Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation is actively seeking industry partners to develop and incorporate the RCCI engine technologies into commercial products. Please contact Chris Thomas (608.890.2524, cthomas@warf.org) to discuss licensing opportunities. To learn more about the RCCI engine technology portfolio, visit warf.org/RCCI. Figure 6: Curran, S., Gao, Z., and Wagner, R. “Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Drive Cycle Emissions and Fuel Economy Estimations Using Vehicle Systems Simulations with E30 and ULSD,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1324, 2014. Figure 8: Daw, S., “Modeling Emissions Controls for RCCI Engines,” Presentation given at the University of Wisconsin–Madison Engine Research Center Symposium, “Engine Fuel Efficiency and Advanced Combustion,” 2013. Figure 10: Curran et al. SAE 2014-01-1324. Figure 11: Curran, S., Hanson, R., Wagner, R., and Reitz, R., “Efficiency and Emissions Mapping of RCCI in a Light-Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0289, 2013. Figure 12: Curran, S., “High Efficiency Clean Combustion in Multi-Cylinder Light-Duty Engines,” 2013 US DOE Annual Merit Review. www4.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/resources/merit-review/sites/default/files/ace016_curran_2013_o.pdf Figure 14: Kaddatz, J., Andrie, M.J., Reitz, R.D., and Kokjohn, S.L., “Light-duty Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Combustion using a Cetane Improver,” SAE Paper 2012-01-1110, 2012. Investing in research, making a difference.
About Rolf Reitz Rolf Reitz is a Wisconsin Distinguished Professor in With major support from the U.S. Department of UW–Madison’s College of Engineering where he Energy’s Sandia laboratories, Caterpillar, GM and serves as director of the Engine Research Center Ford, the Reitz research group currently includes two and director of the Direct-Injection Engine Research staff members, three postdoctoral students and about Consortium. The consortium currently counts 30 17 students pursuing master’s and doctoral degrees. industrial members and three national laboratories Reitz also supervises international visiting scientists. among its participants. Reitz and his group have won numerous industry His research interests include development of and academic awards through the years includ- advanced computer models for predicting engine ing multiple presentations of the SAE International performance. With annual sponsored research funding Harry L. Horning Memorial Award, the DOE Vehicle totaling some $1 million per year, Reitz operates Technologies R&D Program Award in 2012 and the a heavy-duty diesel engine laboratory featuring a ASME Internal Combustion Engine Award in 2011. Caterpillar 3401E single-cylinder test engine For more information, visit reitz.me.wisc.edu. equipped with prototype fuel injection systems. He was the first to demonstrate that use of multiple injections can produce significant emissions reductions in these engines. About WARF Reitz also runs a high-speed engine laboratory WARF helps steward the cycle of research, discovery, featuring an automotive-size diesel engine with commercialization and investment for the University advanced electronically controlled fuel injection of Wisconsin. Founded in 1925 as an independent, systems capable of multiple injections. His experi- nonprofit foundation, WARF manages commercial mental spray research focuses on fuel drop breakup opportunities on more than 1,500 technologies as it and atomization phenomena and his research has funds university research, obtains patents for discov- pioneered the use of computational fluid dynamics to eries from campus labs and licenses the inventions to understand the basic physical processes involved. industry. For more information, visit www.warf.org. Figure 15: UW–Madison Inventors Asst. Prof. Sage Kokjohn, Prof. Rolf Reitz, Reed Hanson, Ph.D. (not pictured: Derek Splitter, Ph.D.) Investing in research, making a difference.
To find out more about WARF’s Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Technology Portfolio visit warf.org/RCCI UW–Madison Campus | 614 Walnut Street, 13th floor | Madison, WI 53726 | 608.263.2500 | www.warf.org Investing in research, making a difference. 03.14
You can also read