THE NOTION OF ANIMISM: SOME VIEWS FROM PROPHETIC TRADITION AND WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGIST PERSPECTIVES

Page created by Andrew Hudson
 
CONTINUE READING
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews
                                                                           eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 4, 2019, pp 348-358
                                                                                  https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7445

           THE NOTION OF ANIMISM: SOME VIEWS FROM PROPHETIC
          TRADITION AND WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGIST PERSPECTIVES
                               Khairulnazrin Nasir1, Ishak Suliaman2, Abur Hamdi Usman3*
1,2
      Department of the al-Quran and al-Hadith, Academy of Islamic Studies, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,
       3
         Department of Dakwah and Usuluddin, Faculty of Islamic Civilisation Studies, Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa
                                                 Selangor (KUIS), Malaysia.
                                               Email: *aburhamdi@kuis.edu.my
                                          th                          th                         th
             Article History: Received on 30 June 2019, Revised on 30 July 2019, Published on 17 September 2019
                                                           Abstract
Purpose of Study: The prophetic tradition (al-Sunnah) as the second authentic source for Muslims includes guidance that
touches all aspects of life, from economics, politics, laws, anthropology, etc. Some Western anthropologists stressed on
debating the notion of animism which is a belief that everything exists in the universe has soul, spirit and must be
respected. In fact, animism had been revered by all religions, and this theory was introduced by Edward Burnett Tylor
(1832-1917) in the 19th century.
Methodology: This article discusses on animism from the perspectives of prophetic traditions and Western
Anthropologist. By applying content analysis method, this article found that both parties have some similarities and
differences. In lieu of this, Islam concluded that animism or the belief in the power of invisible spirits of people’s
ancestors and the spirits of nature to influence the fortunes of humans on earth are blasphemous and deviant. While in
view of Anthropologist, animism puts more emphasis on the uniqueness of each individual soul. Animists see themselves
on roughly equal footing with other animals, plants, and natural forces, and subsequently, have a moral imperative to treat
these agents with respect.
Implications/Applications: The implications for this kind of studies will open to discussions about anthropology through
multi background and methods of data collection.
Keywords: Animism, Prophetic Tradition, Anthropology, Western Anthropologist.
INTRODUCTION
This article discusses the theory of animism through a preliminary study of comparison between the perspective of the
Prophet's Sunnah and Western anthropologists. Animism theory was established in the 19th century by Edward Burnett
Tylor (William H. Swatos & Peter Kivistö, 1998: 528 and Paul A. Erickson & Liam D. Murphy, 2013: 29). According to
him, animism reflects the beliefs of primitive societies. The theory of animism has been introduced by E.B. Tylor in his
book “Primitive Culture: Research into Development Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art, and Custom,”
which was first published on April 1871.
This theory is built on E.B. Tylor’s observations to the beliefs that existed in the primitive communities. As a result, he has
found two significant theories. First, the belief that primitive humans are animism. Second, the evolution of religious
theory that is animism as the oldest belief and the basis of the religions in the world. In this article, the authors chose
several aspects in animism to see the similarities and differences between Sunnah and Western anthropologists’
perspective. This topic is important because it highlights the perspective of Islam through the Prophet's Sunnah in
discussing the knowledge of sociology, particularly in anthropology.
METHODOLOGY
In general, this paper uses specific approaches to answer research questions. It requires qualitative data. The paper
explains, interprets, conceptualizes, and shows an in-depth picture of human ethnography, behaviour, and beliefs. This
keeps with the focus of this paper, which is to compare animism from two perspectives: Sunnah and Western
anthropology. To this end, this paper collects data through a literature review, with reference to articles, books, and
authoritative reading material related to animism. The method of data analysis is descriptive analysis. Because this study is
comparative, and the method used is less controlled and susceptible to perceptual tendencies, the researcher attempts to be
transparent in analysing the data.
DEFINITION OF ANIMISM
Animism is a term in anthropology, referring to ancient or primitive human’s belief (Harvey, 2006: 6). Etymologically,
anthropologists agreed that the definition of animism derived from the Latin words animus or anima which mean soul,
spirit or life (Tylor, 1871: 1: 391). According to the terminology, animism is the belief that everything that exists on this
earth like stone, wood, wind, and others have a soul or spirit (Kamus Dewan, 2005: 62 and Dictionary of Theology, 2006:
27). Its nature is free from human and does not interfere and affect people’s lives (Hexham, 2002: 19, Haught, 1990: 19
and Caner, 2008: 21). People who believe in animism are called “animists” (Kamus Dewan, 2005: 62).

348 |www.hssr.in                                                                                             © Usman et al.
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews
                                                                          eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 4, 2019, pp 348-358
                                                                                 https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7445
According to E.B. Tylor (1871: 1: 377), animism generally refers to a doctrine of the soul and spirit or philosophy of souls
and spirits. Animism is also the belief about creatures with souls which comprises of two forms, namely the belief that
humans have an immortal soul, even after death and the belief that the soul also exists in other creatures (Dhavamony,
2011: 66). Soul and spirit must be respected, thus, they will not interfere but rather help people in this life (Shadily, 2012,
62). The term animism in Arabic is called al-rūḥiyyah or al-iḥyā’iyyah (Mukhtar, 2008: 956-957). ‘Abd al-Wahhāb al-
Nasīrī (2006: 404) in his book Mawsū’at al-Yahūd, used the terms such as al-ḥayawiyyah, ḥayawiyyat al-mādah and al-
mabda’ al-ḥayawi in referring to animism. He said that all of these terms refer to the belief that considers nature has a
range of spirits stored in something seen or unseen that could affect human life.
In the animist world, humans are considered as almost on par with animals, plants and the forces of nature. Therefore, it
becomes a responsibility and moral obligation for animists to interact with and respect these elements. The reason is,
humans are considered as part of nature, rather than a superior or disconnect from it. Likewise, the soul and spirit in the
objects are believed to have extraordinary powers. The spirit is feared and respected. They believe that if the spirit is mad,
it can be dangerous and bring disaster to them. On the contrary, if the spirit is happy and pleased, then it can lead to good
fortune and luck (al-Sāmūk, 2002: 28). Thus, animism is the belief that living things like human beings, animals and
plants, inanimate objects like metal, stone, diversity of geographical areas such as hills, deserts, valleys, jungles, caves, sea
or natural phenomena such as lightning, rain and drought possess spirit or spirituality (Weiser, 2010: 34). According to
anthropologists, there are branches of animism that are being supported by the concept and belief system as follows:
                                             Table 1: The branches of Animism
      BRANCH OF                                                      THE CONCEPT
       ANIMISM
                             Worship souls of the dead, whether the spirits of ancestors or others. Spirits of the dead are
    Ancestor Worship
                             considered as still alive and able to bring good or harm to a living person.
 Spiritualism / Spiritism    Interaction between the souls of the dead and the living
                             Mediator and the experts of the spirit world, also known as shamans, healers, and fortune-
       Shamanism
                             teller (Christina Pratt, 2007).
                             The worship of objects in the universe such as fire, sun, stars, trees, and so on. It also includes
     Nature Worship          the worship of natural phenomena like thunder, lightning or storms. This stage is the
                             foundation for the worship of many gods, or called polytheism (Noorkasiani et al., 2009: 118)
    Dynamism, Pre-
                             Worship certain objects and objects that are considered special and sacred. When the object is
   Animism, Fetishism,
                             used or stored, it can be profitable, or good luck or spared from harm (Dhavamony, 2011, 70).
       Animatism
                             Worship a particular animal. The animal is honored for its purity, ability to bring security,
     Animal Worship
                             good and benefit to them (Forlong, 2008: 85).
                             The faith of certain tribe that worships a particular animal because they consider it as the tribe
        Totemism             symbol or deemed to have blood relation with them (Tylor, 1871: 1644 and Neal, A. G.,
                             1985)
Animisms such as stated in the schedule are a form of respect and ritual to the souls and spirits that are believed to exist in
all things in this universe. Therefore, it is further elaboration to the definition of animism mentioned earlier. The main
elements that become the common ground for the isms are the soul and spirit. However, there are still other elements that
can be associated with animism.
THE ELEMENTS IN ANIMISM
The most important element in animism is to believe that there is the existence of the soul or spirit in every creature. Next,
it has formed other several elements that are synonymous and relevant to animism. Those elements are stated in the figure
below:

                                               Figure 1: Elements of Animism

349 |www.hssr.in                                                                                               © Usman et al.
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews
                                                                           eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 4, 2019, pp 348-358
                                                                                  https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7445
Spirit is the element that gives life to living things. It is also referred to as the soul. The spirit or soul become keywords in
animism. The spirits are considered to be in every creature and can be classified into several categories. First; in relation to
the human spirit, which is the human soul as a vital element, ancestral spirits and evil spirits of the dead in a morbid
condition such as murdered or childbirth. Second; spirits connected with natural objects such as waterfalls, boulders, large
trees and strange, creepy places spirit, animal spirit and soul of objects in space. Third; spirits and powers in relation to
natural phenomena such as lightning, thunder, and floods. Fourth; spirits in relation to social groups such as deities, spirits
and demons and angels (Dhavamony, 2011: 67).
Animists honored spirits. This honour is done in order to avoid disturbance and seek help from them (Chopra, 2005: 3).
The concept of spirit among primitive people is not the same as what is understood by modern society. Primitive society
cannot imagine the existence of a spirit that is not material. For them, the spirit is built up of elements that are invisible, has
form, age, and able to eat and drink. This perspective can be seen through the provision of food by primitive societies as an
offering to the spirits (Hadiwijono, 2000: 46).
In addition, animists also believe in the existence of the spirit, the spirit that is found in all living things and is believed to
have certain powers (Kamus Dewan, 2005: 1433). In the study of anthropology, this belief is also known as dynamism.
When compared, the concept of animism and dynamism do not have a significant disparity, but both appear to be alongside
and mutually influenced each other (Hamid, 2003: 31). According to N. K. Ryan (1962: 29), spirit is different from soul
because it is not congruent to human life. Furthermore, the human spirit is closely related to the heart, while the spirit in
objects and inanimate objects represent spirits from outside that goes into it.
Belief in the existence of unseen creatures is the most important element in animism. It is described in many versions and
interpretations where animists believe that those creatures exist but cannot be seen with the naked eyes. Those creatures
were named goblins, genies, ghosts, vampires, demons and so on. Spirits are believed to be able to influence a situation
and have power in the real world (Halimi, 2008: 15 and Bane, 2012).
Magic and sacred elements are associated with animism. An animist believes that beings or objects around him are not the
same in soul and spirit. In anthropology, the belief is known as dynamism, fetishism, totemism, and animatism. Some
anthropologists consider these beliefs as the earliest form of animism. Therefore, it is called pre-animism (Hendrouspito,
2006: 33). Supernatural power stored in the creatures and objects can be explored and benefit the people in the form of
magic (Rahmat, 1979: 32).
In animism, a person is believed to be able to connect the two dimensions, which are the real world and the spirit world.
The bridge is a person called as a shaman. Shamanism is the belief that shamans are mediators or messengers between the
human world and the spiritual world (Chopra, 2005: 3: 712-713). It is believed that he can cure diseases by improving the
spirit of the patients. Allegedly, he is able to travel into the spiritual world with the aim to solve the problems faced by the
community. Supernatural beings are believed to be able to visit the real world to give guidance to people and treat diseases
of the human soul (Eliade, 1972, 3-7). Besides shaman as the intermediary (spirit-medium), they are also called witch
doctor, shamans, healers, saints, martial arts teacher, witches, shamans in the western or Kāhin in Arabic.
The belief in supernatural beings has caused fear and respect among animists. If people made mistakes or acted blindly
without complying with certain rules, then it will offend the spirits. In order to establish a good relationship between
humans and supernatural beings, sacred prohibitions have been established. The concept of sacred prohibition is very
similar to the taboo.
These elements are very significant and even debated in the concept of animism. Thus, Islam has put forward its own
perspective on these elements and other issues in regard to the unseen, particularly through the Prophet's Sunnah.
THE SOULS BY SUNNAH NABAWI
Animism deals with many spiritual aspects with regards to the spirit. Before embarking on a comparative discussion, the
authors explain the Sunnah’s general perspective of spirit. The Malay word roh (soul) comes from the Arabic word “rūḥ”
and the plural is called “arwāḥ” which means an element that gives life to human and animal. The term “rūḥ” in the Quran
also refers to Quran itself, revelation, the Prophet ‘Īsā and the Angel Gabriel. Rūḥ is also called the “soul” and “breath”. In
philosophy, the spirit is the antonym of “material objects”, while “rūḥānī” is a thing that has a soul (Mustafa Ibrahim, nd:
380). Spirit, soul, and desire have a very close relationship, to the extent that they are considered as the same elements (Ibn
al-Qayyim, 1975, 21). Spirit is one of the unseen elements and is not easily accessible by the human mind. There is no
other way for man to know the nature and actuality of the spirit except by shariah explanation (Ibn Kathīr, 1999: 5: 116).
Sunnah explains that the soul which is breathed into the body of a fetus is a new soul and has nothing to do with the souls
of the dead. During sleep, the soul separates from the body, but the reality is not like one occurs during death. Souls of the
dead would be in the barzakh and have nothing to do with this life. Punishment or reward in barzakh involves the spirit
and the body. Spirits of the dead do not appear as ghosts or return to the world to intervene in people's lives. Sunnah
perspective deduction of the spirit as described is from authors’ induction analysis of hadiths in al-Kutub al-Sittah. The
authors use the method of observation and induction (tatabbu’ and istiqrā’) on the topic and al-Hadith in al-Kutub al-
Sittah. In addition to researching the hadith from thematic standpoint, the authors also use a few important keywords such
as; rūh, arwāḥ, nafs and nasamah.
350 |www.hssr.in                                                                                                 © Usman et al.
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews
                                                                        eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 4, 2019, pp 348-358
                                                                               https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7445
There are 41 categories of hadith with the different status that discuss the aspect of the soul. The authors have made a
classification of the content of the hadiths and the details can be seen in the following table:
                               Table 2: The Hadiths about the Soul in al-Kutub al-Sittah
                                                                                               The Hadith Distribution In
                                                                                 Num. of
                                   Topics                                                          al-Kutub al-Sittah
                                                                                 Hadith
                                                                                               B M AD T N IM
 Facts about soul must be derived from revelation (al-Wahy)                         2          5   1     -    2 -       -
 Only Human and Animal Possess Soul                                                 3          3   3     1    2 3       1
 The Soul Is an Invisible Entity and Can Only Be Seen When the Angel
                                                                                    2           -    2    1     -   -    1
 Claims It.
 “The Spirit of God” (Rūḥullāh) refer to Ādam and ‘Isa                              4          14    5    1     3   0    3
 “Rūḥ al-Qudus” Is the Angel Gabriel                                                3          3     3    2     1   2    0
 The Soul at the First Stage of Human Creation                                      3          4     -    1     3   -    1
 The Spirit of the trend Fellow Man                                                 2          1     1    1     -   -    -
 The Soul Split Up with Current Bodies                                              3          10    2    4     2   1    2
 The Soul Is Claimed by The Angel and the Transmission of The Soul to
                                                                                    6           4    4    4     1   2    5
 Barzakh
 The Condition of The Deads in the Grave Is Soulless                                3           2    3    3     1   2     -
 The Destination of The Souls in The Barzakh Are Different According to
                                                                                    7          14    4    1     3   3    5
 Their Actions.
 The Souls in The Barzakh Do Not Travel Back to The World                           3           1    1    0     4   0    2
                                   Total                                            41
   Source: Analysis of Hadiths about The Soul In the al-Kutub al-Sittah, October 2015 [A: Ṣāḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, M: Ṣaḥīḥ
         Muslim, AD: Sunan Abū Dāwūd, T: Jāmi’ al-Tirmidhī, N: Sunan al-Nasa’ī and IM: Sunan Ibn Mājah].
Thus, the Sunnah provides a clear picture of the soul. However, there are still many secrets about the soul that could not be
grasped by human logic. In its hypothesis, the paper argues that there is a difference between the perspective of the Sunnah
and Western anthropology about the beliefs of animism. The difference is fundamental because of the difference in
reference source; the Sunnah of Nabawi is based on revelation while Western anthropological theories are based on field
studies and observations.
 ANIMISM FROM TWO PERSPECTIVES: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PERSPECTIVES OF SUNNAH
AND WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGIST
In this section, the authors compare the various aspects of animism and related matters, from the perspective of Western
anthropologists and Sunnah.
i. Source of Information about Souls
Western anthropologist E. B. Tylor proposed the theory of animism based on data collection through empirical studies. He
made a series of expeditions to many parts of the world such as Latin America, Africa and Australia (John Scott, 2007:
186). Based on his observations of the indigenous, primitives and isolated communities, he found that they shared the same
belief that is believing in the spiritual world (Harvey, 2006: 7). Evolution theory and the origin of religions were
formulated based on ethnographic records and drawings of the primitive tribes (Sutardi, 2007: 25).
Sunnah perspective: Sunnah also discusses sociology, particularly in the field of anthropology. Facts about the unseen are
proposed in accordance with samiyyat sources that are the Quran and Sunnah. The most important element in animism is
the spirit and soul. Therefore, people should not make theories and assumptions about the soul except through revelation
(Dhavamony, 2011: 67). Prophet Muhammad was asked by the Jews about the nature of the soul and its features. He kept
silent until the revelation of the verse (Al-Isrā’ 17: 85):
          “And they ask you about the soul. Say: “The Soul is of the affair of my Lord; and mankind has not
          been given of knowledge but little.”(Narrated by al-Bukhārī, Muslim and al-Tirmidhī).
Information about the soul has been told by Allah and His Messengers and need to be believed by the believer. According
to al-Rāzi (1999: 21: 382), God has made it clear that the soul exists and its formation and influence in giving life to the
body comes with His Will. Despite limited specific knowledge on the soul, it does not mean that it does not exist. Thus, the
tendency to describe the nature of the soul according to own understanding by relying on assumptions, imaginations,
stories, and dreams in order to unveil the unseen matters is beyond useless.
ii. Two-Dimensional World
According to anthropologists, the animists believe in the existence of two worlds that are the real world and the unseen
world. E. B. Tylor argued that the events of the life, death, dreams, and nightmares make the primitive people aware of the

351 |www.hssr.in                                                                                           © Usman et al.
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews
                                                                          eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 4, 2019, pp 348-358
                                                                                 https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7445
existence of the unseen (Tylor, 1873: 1: 428). This is because they can see the soul of their dead ancestors, animals, plants,
and the environment in their dreams, as seen in the real world.
Sunnah perspective: Sunnah also recognizes the existence of the two-dimensional worlds. The principle of Iman more
fundamental towards the unseen. Similar and basic issues that are discussed in animism and Sunnah is the matter of spirit
and supernatural creatures. Sunnah acknowledges the existence of spirits and supernatural beings such as jinn and angels.
The description of supernatural beings described in the Sunnah is very different to the ones highlighted in the forms of
animism on supernatural beings.
iii. Religion and The Oldest Belief
Western anthropologists argue that the emergence of the earliest religions is in line with their realization that the world is
not only inhabited by physical beings, but it is also inhabited by spiritual beings called the soul or spirit. E. B. Tylor argued
that animism is the simplest human belief and the essence of all religions (Harvey, 2006: 7). As proof, believing in spirit
and supernatural creatures can be found in all religions. He established that the theory of religious evolution was expanded
in line with civilization. The Evolutionary Origins of Religious according to Tylor begins with animism, polytheism, and
dynamism and ends with monotheism. Nevertheless, he was not debating whether this evolution will end up with atheism.
Rahmat S. H (1979: 4-7) interpreted based on the Tylor’s evolution theory by stating that animism starts with believing in
the existence of the spiritual realm. The primitive people are said to continue to believe in the existence of ghosts, spirit
and honouring the spirits of the ancestors. The life of primitive society progressed and expanded on the economic and
social standpoint. Consequently, they no longer had to go into the jungle to collect fruit and hunting wild animals. People
began farming and raising animals. This leads to the emergence of polytheistic beliefs. From polytheism, the human belief
continued to shrink until it comes to trust monotheism, worship only one God. According to Taylor, the religion of
monotheism is the final result of the development of human intelligence and building trust. The belief began to develop
with animism, polytheism and ended up with monotheism.

                                 Figure 2: The Evolution of Human Belief by E. B. Tylor
Sunnah perspective: Sunnah proposes information that is totally different than western anthropology theory. Allah
Almighty created His servants in a state of pure from shirk. Imam Muslim narrated from ‘Iyāḍ bin Ḥimār that the Prophet
said in a hadith Qudsi:
           “Behold, my Lord commanded me that I should teach you which you do not know and which He has
           taught me today. (He has instructed thus): The property which I have conferred upon them is lawful
           for them. I have created My servants as one having a natural inclination to the worship of Allah but it
           is Satan who turns them away from the right religion and he makes unlawful what has been declared
           lawful for them ad he commands them to ascribe partnership with Re, although he has no justification
           for that.” )Narrated by Muslim).
Provided with the purity will guide people to worship only Allah SWT. This has been clearly proved and reinforced with
arguments from the Quran and the authentic hadiths of the Prophet PBUH. Idolatry, apostasy, and the deviation of faith
began to appear in a few centuries after the creation of Adam (al-Qafārī, 1992: 14). Some western scholars like Adamson
Hoebel and Andrew Lang also accept that the original human beliefs acknowledge the concept of oneness and supreme
God (The High God Concept). They believe that the deviations from monotheism to polytheism is due to the belief in
deities that is lower than the highest god. It starts with the “idea of creating myth” and “Ancient Adam” in humans.
According to Andrew Lang, distortion is caused by the human passion to create myths and fables that are great and did not
achieve the intention to entertain their audiences. Then people created stories about gods and goddesses, spirits, ghosts,
demons and so on. These elements were portrayed as characters in the story and sometimes filled with philosophy and
ideology of the writer. In this development, a reference to the Almighty God is also visible, although still vague. People
tend to concentrate on the gods and goddesses created by man himself while the true God is left behind (Adamson Hoebel,
1958: 553).
Sunnah does not deny that there is a phenomenon of humans who changed from their original nature (fitrah), from faithful
to shirk. This situation is not because of evolution, but the man had strayed from the right path because of certain factors.
Sunnah also noted the historical fact that shirk in the form of ancestor worship began to appear in the time of Prophet
Noah. His people worship their pious leaders through the worship of idols. Al-Bukhārī (no. 4920) narrated that Ibn ‘Abbās
said that Wadd, Suwā’, Yaghūth Ya’ūq and Nasr (The name of idols) is the name of the righteous people during the time of
Noah. When they died, the devil whispered to their people, “build statues in their events and give them (statues) with their

352 |www.hssr.in                                                                                               © Usman et al.
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews
                                                                        eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 4, 2019, pp 348-358
                                                                               https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7445
names.” Finally, they did it. However, the idols were not worshiped until the community (the generation that built the
idols) have died and knowledge had disappeared, then the idols are worshipped in the end.

                   Figure 3: Pattern Change Trust Some People According to Sunnah Perspective
Iv. Spirit Form
Animists believe that the spirit has face, legs, hands, age and consume food. Spirit also sometimes can be seen with the
naked eyes even though it is made up of invisible entity. Thus, he was offered dish and sacrifices in the form of animals,
food and some other objects (R.P. Suyono, 2008:93-98).
Sunnah perspective: Sunnah says the spirit is an element of mass. There has been no statement and news of the
appearance or shape in detail. Umm Salamah said:
          “The Messenger of Allah entered upon Abu Salamah (after he had died), and his eyes were wide
          open. He closed his eyes, then he said: ‘When the soul is taken, the sight follows it.’” (Narrated by
          Muslim, Abū Dāwūd, and Ibn Mājah).
This hadith made it clear that the soul has a figure. The act of removing something does not happen unless the object of
mass. In addition, vision does not follow unless it can be viewed and has mass (al-Bassām, 2003: 3: 156 and al-ʻUthaymīn,
1992: 3: 106). In the perception of the researcher, only this hadith clearly describes to us the identity of the soul.
v. Classification of Good Spirits and Evil Spirit
In animism as described by western anthropologists, the spirit can be categorized into two, namely good spirits and evil
spirits (Sutardi, 2007: 24). Good spirits are worshipped for example the spirits of ancestors that are believed to have links
with the living (Robert S. Ellwood & Gregory D. Alles, 2009: 14). The spirits were not on the same level. There are the
most powerful and respected spirits, for instance, the tribe leaders or kings. Regularly, there would be a change in
worshipping from a spirit to another.
Natural disasters have been associated with the spirits who are angry. They consider volcanic eruptions, hurricanes, floods,
lightning, fire and so on come from anger of evil spirits or the wrath of good spirits which were not honoured. People need
to be careful in their lives and not to do things that can offend these unseen creatures because it will lead to bad things
happen such as diseases, natural disasters and so on (Othman, 2003: 326). Spirit of someone who is ill and not taken care
of, treated and managed well after his death is believed to be antu buta (blind ghost) (Hermansyah, 2010: 48), and get
revenge and bring disaster to the people who are still alive. Furthermore, it can also happen if a person died of suicide or
due to cruelty and murder. (R.P. Suyono, 2008: 30-31). Ghosts are thought to spread disease or cause a person to become
insane (Bane, 2012: 158).
Sunnah perspective: Sunnah does not classify spirits of the dead into the spirit of good and evil based on their interference
in the affairs of human life. Sunnah just stated that the good souls are the soul of believers who are obedient to Allah when
they were alive. While evil souls are the souls who reject and disobey Allah. Examples of these classifications as stated in
a hadith that rūh ṭayyibah and rūḥ khabithah. Abu Huraira reported:
          When the soul of a believer would go out (of his body) it would be received by two angels who would
          take it to the sky. Hammad (one of the narrators in the chain of transmitters) mentioned the sweetness
          of its odour, (and further said) that the dwellers of the sky say: Here comes the pious soul from the
          side of the earth Let there be blessings of Allah upon the body in which it resides. And it is carried (by
          the angels) to its Lord, the Exalted and Glorious. He would say: Take it to its destined end. And if he
          is a nonbeliever and as it (the soul) leaves the body-Hammad made a mention of its foul smell and of
          its being cursed-the dwellers of the sky say: There comes a dirty soul from the side of the earth, and it
          would be said: Take it to its destined end. Abu Huraira reported that Allah's Messenger put a thin
          cloth which was with him upon his nose while making a mention (of the foul smell) of the soul of a
          non-believer. (Narrated by Muslim).
However, if the meaning of the spirit is related to the jinn who are spiritual, then the classification can be done. Many
authentic hadiths explaining that jinn helped humankind for specific purposes such as witchcraft and fortune-telling.
Meanwhile, the jinn can lead people astray by using temptations of the spiritual aspect, and also can harm humans

353 |www.hssr.in                                                                                             © Usman et al.
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews
                                                                        eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 4, 2019, pp 348-358
                                                                               https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7445
physically and mentally When talking about spirits and demons, Ibn Taymiah (1995, 21: 15 and 25: 240) also used the
term “evil spirits” to the jinn and Satan in some places in Majmū’ al-Fatāwā. Ibn Taymiah.
vi. Correlation Between the Spirit of the Dead and the Living
Belief in spirits born out of a sense of dependency to communicate with spirits with the aim of preventing evil, eliminate
misfortune and bring prosperity (Dhavamony, 2011: 67). “Spiritualism” is the belief that spirits of the dead can
communicate with the living. According to the Kamus Dewan (2005: 1521), “spiritualism” is a belief that spirits of the
dead can communicate with the living, especially through meditation. This belief exists in various forms all over the world
(Chopra, 2005: 3: 743).
Communication with spirits can be made in the form of worshipping the spirit individually or in masses. For this purpose, a
ritual is performed by family members at the family shrine. In addition, the role of the healer or shaman is also used to
interpret the will of the spirit or convey messages from family members who are still alive (Dhavamony, 2011: 68).
Accordingly, modern animist movement uses modern equipment to bring the spirits of the dead, to dialogue, to ask for
help, spiritual surgery and others. According to ‘Ali Sa’īd al-‘Ubaydī (2006: 1: 13-17), the definition of “modern animism”
chosen by him is one modern movement that combines people of various faiths and different ideologies. They are
unanimous in believing in the existence and immortality of the soul. They believe that the spirit can be summoned and
dialogue. The fundamental doctrine of the soul and the details are varied based on each stream. On the surface, this
movement seeks to take advantage and experience from the spirit and for the benefit of humanity. However, in reality, it is
a movement to destroy all of the revealed religion using a variety of medium.
Sunnah perspective: After the soul parted from the dead body, it is no longer has a relationship with the living, except in
dreams. In some hadith the Prophet told the story of ‘Abd Allāh bin ‘Amr bin Ḥarām, father of Jābir, who was killed in the
Battle of Uhud. He pleaded to Allah to return to the world, but it was not granted. Allah does not allow the spirit which is
in the barzakh to return to the world. If the souls of the dead could return to the world, the spirits of the martyrs are
worthier and more fit to be discharged compared with the spirits of ordinary people who have not given any service to
Islam. Prophet Muhammad said:
          Nobody who enters Paradise likes to go back to the world except a martyr. Indeed, he likes to go back
          to the world. He said, “so that I may be martyred ten times in the path of Allah.” That is because he
          has seen the glory given to him by God. (Narrated by al-Tirmidhī).
If the soul was the soul of the believers and the favored, he no longer wanted to go back to the world. The evil spirit was
preoccupied with the painful punishment in the barzakh. Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah believes that the punishment in the
barzakh is true based on the Quran and Sunnah. However, they conflicted whether it is applied to the body or soul. [First]
Ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī and al-Karrāmiyyah take the opinion from the story of the question in the grave happen to the body
only. God gives them the ability to listen and understand and feel pleasure and torment. [Second] Ibn Ḥazm and Ibn
Hubayrah of the opinion that the questioning happens to the spirit only. [Third] majority of the scholars disagree with them
and believes that the soul returned to the body or a part of the body (al-‘Asqalānā, 1960, 3: 235).
Here, Sunnah perspective has clearly shown that the souls of the dead cannot come back to the world. So, what is it that
appear in various forms such as light, figure, smoke, animal, and so on when the spirits of the dead are summoned? Where
does the voice hear during the ritual to bring the spirit come from? Sunnah says all of that is the interferences of jinn and
demons that can incarnate in the form of other creatures like human being, snake or a black dog.
vii. The Destinations of Soul After Death
Animists believe that the souls of the dead possessed not only living things but also inanimate objects. It is said that the
soul is also found in rocks, large trees, weapons, traditional musical instrument and so on. The spirits are celebrated in
order to return the favour, to avoid disturbance and to avoid their anger.
Mariasusai Dhavamony (2011, 69) concludes that there are three forms of beliefs about the conditions and whereabouts of
the soul after the death of the body as follows;
    1.   The soul floats over the surface of the earth and interacts with human life such as visiting his home.
    2.   The concept of rebirth, reawakening of the dead creatures, also known as reincarnation (Chopra, 2005: 3: 647) or
         tanasukh al-arwah (Chopra, 2005: 3: 748). It appears again in the form of humans, animals or plants.
    3.   Belief in the existence of different dimension as a place for spirits to reside like on islands, the underworld or
         mountains. The spirits continue their life similar to worldly life, given rewards or punishments in accordance with
         the actions while living in the world.
Sunnah perspective: According to the Sunnah, the destination of the soul is no longer in this world among humans. The
souls of the dead are in the barzakh, which is a totally different dimension from this world. Islamic scholars agreed that the
souls are in the barzakh. However, they differ in determining the specific place where the souls reside. Ibn Abī al-‘Izz al-

354 |www.hssr.in                                                                                             © Usman et al.
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews
                                                                         eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 4, 2019, pp 348-358
                                                                                https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7445
Ḥanafī (1997: 398-399) gathered all the opinions on mustaqar al-Arwāḥ in his book Sharh al-Aqeedah al-Ṭahāwiah of 15
opinions, 13 of the opinion of Islamic scholars and two of the other belief.
The authors chose the opinion that the souls of the faithful are in ‘Illyyīn that is a place in the seventh sky, while the souls
of the unbelievers and unjust are in Sijjīn – the seventh layer of the earth. In addition, the position of the believers in
‘Illiyyīn are also varied (Ibn Qayyim, 1975, 115). The highest-ranking is the position of the soul of the Prophet Muhammad
and the soul of other Prophets. Their positions are also different based on their status in the eyes of Allah. Abū Hurayrah
reported that the Prophet said:
           “When the believer is dying, the angels of mercy come to him with white silk and sya: “Come out
           content and with the pleasure of Allah upon you to the mercy of Allah, fragrance and a Lord Who is
           not angry; So it comes out like the best fragrance of musk. They pass him from one to another until
           they bring him to the gate of heaven, where they say, How good is this fragrance that has come to you
           from the Earth! Then the souls of the believers come to him and they rejoice more over him than any
           one of you rejoices when his absent loved one comes to him. They ask him: 'What happened to so-
           and-so, what happened to so-and-so?” They say: “Let him be, for he was in the hardship of the
           world. When he says, 'Did he not come here?' They say: 'He was taken to the pit (of Hell).' Come out
           discontent, subject of Divine wrath, to the punishment of Allah, the Mighty and Sublime; so it comes
           out like the foulest stench of a corpse. They bring him to the gates of the Earth, where they say: 'How
           foul is this stench!' Then they bring him to the souls of the disbelievers.” (Narrated by al-Nasa’ī)
viii. Public Perceptions Toward Animism
In reviewing religion, anthropologists do not focus their attention on the truth about any ideology based on confidence and
belief but focus on the existence, theology and the reality-based on empirical-oriented research (Sutardi, 2007: 22). In the
study of theology, there are religions that contain animism elements such as the worship of spirits, the belief in magic, and
the summoning of spirit, and so on. The religions in the world which are affected with elements of animism are Shinto,
Serer, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Paganism and Neopaganism. Most animism elements have disappeared with the
emergence of religions, but it is fundamental to the Japanese Shinto religion (Shadily, 2012: 62). According to the
observation done by researchers, some of the Muslims are also affected by elements of animism such as in Shi’ism and
extremist Sufism.
Sunnah perspective: As a religion which always stressed on the purity of the faith, Islam, through the Quran and the
Sunnah as its medium, explains the forms of shirk and ways to prevent it. In this article, authors only focus on Sunnah
methodology to eradicate animism to the grassroots.
Sunnah takes a firm perception in this matter. Sunnah says that an animism is a form of idolatry, falsehood, deviant and
superstition. The theories about the soul, spirit and supernatural beings submitted by western anthropologists contradict
with each other. Their hypotheses through observations to the indigenous communities were not consistent. Thus, the
Sunnah suggests some special methods to prevent Muslims from being involved or influenced by elements of animism.
    1.   Praying to other things like the soul of the dead, jinn, nature’s spirit and so on is an act of associating partners to
         Allah SWT.
    2.   Extremism like glorifying ancestors, tribe leaders, or saints either during they are alive or after they are dead are
         prohibited.
    3.   No magic or sacred being in talismans and amulets. The souls of the dead do not reside in inanimate objects.
         Truthfully, those amulets, talismans, charms and so on do not bring any benefits to its owners. Sometimes they are
         possessed with Jinn or Satan which also called as khadam.
    4.   Individuals who are involved in shamanism like witches, soothsayer, fortune-tellers, shaman, witch doctor, and so
         on are the mediator who directly interacts with Jinn and Satan.
    5.   Sunnah bans social system which practices sacred prohibitions, belief in jinx, cursed and taboo. This system is not
         logic and it is solely to educate people with scare tactics.
Based on the comparison done between the two perspectives, it can be concluded that almost all aspects are different.
Common ground can only be agreed on the recognition of the existence of the unseen and the real world; and the
classification of the good and evil spirits. The details can be found in the table below:
CONCLUSION
The theory of animism is still hotly debated by Muslim and western anthropology scholars. Based on this comparative
article between the theory of western anthropologists and Sunnah, it can be concluded that there is only a slight similarity
between the two perspectives on animism. The difference is even more noticeable and it is hard to search for common
ground. Therefore, Islam through Quran and Sunnah oppose all forms of isms that conflicted with revelation upon the
sanctity and purity of faith.

355 |www.hssr.in                                                                                              © Usman et al.
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews
                                                                            eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 4, 2019, pp 348-358
                                                                                   https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7445

                        Table 3: Animism between Sunnah and Western Anthropologists Perspective
 No.          Comparison Aspect                   Western Anthropologist                                    Sunnah
              Source of Data About          Data collected from empirical studies.          Data about the spirit of the unseen
  1          Religion, Spirit and The          Observations made to the oldest               and must be guided by the Quran
                     Unseen                       communities in the world.                               and Hadith.
                                          Recognizes the existence of two worlds; the        Recognizes the existence of two
  2         Two-Dimensional Nature             real and the unseen with its own            worlds; the real and the unseen with
                                                          perspective.                               its own perspective.
                                                                                           Monotheism is the belief of human
             Religion and The Oldest      Animism is the oldest belief and the basis of
  3                                                                                        origin. Shirk in various forms such
                      Belief                             all religions.
                                                                                                  as animism appear later.
                                           The form and features of the spirit is very       Spirit is an invisible entity. Many
  4               Form of Spirit
                                                     similar to the living.                     differences with the living.
                                                                                            Spirit are classified into good and
            Classification of Good and     Spirits are classified into good and evil by
  5                                                                                         evil according to their deeds when
                    Evil Spirits            its character and its role for the living.
                                                                                                        they were alive.
            Correlation Between the                                                        There is no relationship between the
                                          Spirit can still be connected, cause good or
  6         Spirit of the Dead and the                                                      spirit and the people who are alive
                                                   ill to people who are alive.
                       Living                                                                          except in dreams.
                                          After parting with the body, spirits float the      Souls are in the barzakh. Their
            The Destination of the Soul
  7                                       surface of the earth, transmit to a new body         location varies based on their
                  After Death
                                                        or in the unseen.                     practice when they were alive.
            Public Perceptions Toward      Not concerned about the ideological truth.        Reject animism. It is polytheistic
  8
                    Animism                 Many religions influenced by animism.                         and deviant.
                 Source: Analysis on Comparison between Sunnah and the Western Anthropologists’ Perspective
REFERENCES
      1.    ‘Ali Sa'id al-‘Ubaydī. (2006). Al-Mawsū’ahh Shamian li al-Madhhab al-Rūḥiyyah al-Hadithah [The
            Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Modern Spiritualism Doctrines]. Riyadh: Dār Kunuz Ishbīliyā.
      2.    Abū Dāwūd, Sulaymān. (2000). “Sunan Abū Dāwūd” in Mawsū’āt al-Ḥadīth al-Sharīf, al-Kutub al-Sittah
            [Encyclopedia of the Hadith- The Six Books] ed. Ṣāliḥ ‘Abd al-ʻAzīz Āl al-Shaykh. Riyadh: Dār al-Salām.
      3.    Al-‘Asqalani, Ibn Ḥajar. (1960). Fath al-Bari Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari [The Opening from al-Bari The
            Explaination of Sahih Bukhari]. Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah.
      4.    Al-Bassām, ‘Abd Allāh ‘Abd al-Raḥmān. (2003). Tawḍīḥ al-Aḥkām Min Bulūgh al-Marām [The Clarification of
            Judgments from Bulugh al-Maram-book] Mecca: Maktabat al-Asadī.
      5.    Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad Ismāʻīl. (2000). “Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhāri” in Mawsūʻat al-Ḥadīth al-Sharīf: al-Kutub al-Sittah
            [Encyclopedia of the Hadith- The Six Books] ed. Ṣāliḥ ‘Abd al-ʻAzīz Āl al-Shaykh. Riyadh: Dār al-Salām.
      6.    Al-Hanafi, Ibn Abi al-`Izz. (1997). Sharḥ al-Aqīdah al-Ṭaḥāwiah [The Explaination of Book Aqidah Tahawiah]
            ed. Ahmad Shakir. Saudi Arabia: Wizārah al-Shu'ūn al-Islamiyya.
      7.    Al-Juhanī, Māni’Ḥammād. (1996). Al-Mawsū’ah al-Muyassarah fī al-Adyān wa al-Madhāhib wa al-Ahzāb al-
            Mu‘āṣarah [The Encyclopedia of Religions, Doctrines and Contemporary Parties] Riyaḍh: Dar al-Nadwah al-
            ‘Ālamiyyah.
      8.    Al-Nasīrī, ‘Abd al-Wahhab. (2006). Mawsu'at al-Yahud wa al-Yahūdiyyah wa al-Ṣaḥyuniyyat [Encyclopedia of
            Jews, Judaism and Zionism]. Cairo: Dar al-Shurūq.
      9.    Al-Qafari, Nasir ‘Abd Allah. (1992). Al-Mujaz fi al-Adyan wa al-Mazahib al-Mu’asarah [The Summary of
            Contemporary Religions and Doctrines]. Riyadh: Dar al-Sami’i.
      10.   Al-Rāzī, Muḥammad ‘Umar. (1999). Al-Tafsīr al-Kabīr [The Great Interpretation]. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth
            al-‘Arabī.
      11.   Al-Sāmūk, Sa'dūn Mahmud. (2002). Mawsū’at al-Adyān wa al-Mu’taqadāt al-Qadimah [The Encyclopedia of
            Ancient Religions]. Jordan: Dār al-Manāhij.
      12.   Al-Tirmidhī, Muḥammad ‘Īsā. (2000). “Jāmiʻ al-Tirmidhī” in Mawsū’at al-Ḥadīth al-Sharīf. al-Kutub al-Sittah
            [Encyclopedia of the Hadith- The Six Books] ed. Ṣāliḥ ‘Abd al-ʻAzīz Āl al-Shaykh. Riyadh: Dār al-Salām.
      13.   Al-ʻUthaymīn, Muḥammad Ṣāliḥ. (1992). Majmūʻ Fatāwā wa Rasā’il Faḍīlat al-Shaykh Muḥammad bin Ṣāliḥ al-
            ʻUthaymī [The Collecions of Fatwa and Letters Ibn 'Uthaymeen] ed. Fahd Nāṣir. Riyāḍh: Dār al-Waṭan.
      14.   Ames, M. M. (1964). Magical-Animism and Buddhism: A Structural Analysis af the Sinhalese Religious
            System. The Journal of Asian Studies, 23(S1), 21-52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2050620
      15.   Bane, Theresa. (2012). Encyclopedia of Demons in World Religions and Cultures. United State: McFarland and
            Company.

356 |www.hssr.in                                                                                                © Usman et al.
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews
                                                                     eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 4, 2019, pp 348-358
                                                                            https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7445
   16. Brohm, J. (1963). Buddhism and Animism in a Burmese Village. The Journal of Asian Studies, 22(2), 155-167.
       https://doi.org/10.2307/2050009
   17. Brown, L. A., & Walker, W. H. (2008). Prologue: Archaeology, Animism and Non-Human Agents. Journal of
       Archaeological Method and Theory, 15(4), 297-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-008-9056-6
   18. Bruce, M. (1941). Animism vs. Evolution of the Concept “Alive”. The Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 81-90.
       https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1941.9917057
   19. Caner, E. H. (2008). The Popular Encyclopedia of Apologetics: Surveying the Evidence for the Truth of
       Christianity. New York: Harvest House Publishers.
   20. Chopra, Ramesh. (2005). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Religion. Delhi: Isha Books.
   21. Christina Pratt. (2007). An Encyclopedia of Shamanism. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group.
   22. Dennis, W., & Mallinger, B. (1949). Animism and Related Tendencies in Senescence. Journal of
       Gerontology, 4(3), 218-221. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/4.3.218
   23. Dhavamony, M. (2011). Phenomenology of Religion. Yogyakarta: Publisher Canisius.
   24.
       Dictionary of Theology. (2006). Yogyakarta: Publisher Canisius.
   25. E. B Tylor. (1873). Primitive Culture Researches Into Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art and
       Custom. London: John Murrey.
   26. Eliade, Mircea. (1972). Shamanism, Teknik-teknik Kuno Khayal. Bollingen: Princeton University Press.
   27. Forlong, J. G. (2008). Encyclopedia of Religions. New York: Cosimo Inc.
   28. Goldenweiser, A. A. (1910). Totemism, An Analytical Study. The Journal of American Folklore, 23(88), 179-
       293. https://doi.org/10.2307/534841
   29. Gries, P., Su, J., & Schak, D. (2012). Toward The Scientific Study of Polytheism: Beyond Forced‐Choice
       Measures of Religious Belief. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(4), 623-637.
       https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01683.x
   30. Haber, A. F. (2009). Animism, Relatedness, Life: Post-Western Perspectives. Cambridge Archaeological
       Journal, 19(3), 418-430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000602
   31. Hadiwijono. Harun. (2000). Religi Suku Murba di Indonesia. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
   32. Halimi, A. J. (2008). Sejarah dan Tamadun Bangsa Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication and Distributors
       Sdn Bhd.
   33. Hamid, M. L. (2003). “Pandangan Semesta Melayu: Pra dan Pasca Islam,” in Pengajian Tamadun Asia, ed.
       Afifah Abu Yazid. Pahang, PTS Media Group Sdn Bhd.
   34. Harvey, G. (2006). Animism: Respecting the Living World. New York: Columbia University Press.
   35. Haught, J. F. (1990). What is Religion ?: An Introduction. New York: Paulist Press.
   36. Hendroouspito. (2006). Sosiologi Agama.Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
   37. Hermansyah. (2010). Ilmu Gaib di Kalimantan Barat. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
   38. Hexham, I. (2002). Pocket Dictionary of New Religious Movements. Madison: Inter Varsity Press.
   39. Hoebel, Adamson. (1958). Primitive Man in the World: An Introduction to Antropology. New York: McGraw-Hill
       Book Companay.
   40. Huang, I., & Lee, H. W. (1945). Experimental Analysis of Child Animism. The Pedagogical Seminary and
       Journal of Genetic Psychology, 66(1), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856559.1945.10533311
   41. Hultkrantz, Å. (1973). A Definition of Shamanism. Temenos-Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion, 9.
   42. Ibn Kathir, ‘Isma'il Kathīr. (1999). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Aẓīm [The Great al-Quran Interpretation]. Riyādh: Dār al-
       Taybah.
   43. Ibn Mājah, Muḥammad. (2000). “Sunan Ibn Mājah” in Mawsū’āt al-Ḥadīth al-Sharīf, al-Kutub al-Sittah
       [Encyclopedia of the Hadith- The Six Books] ed. Ṣāliḥ ‘Abd al-ʻAzīz Āl al-Shaykh. Riyadh: Dār al-Salām.
   44. Ibn Qayyim, Muhammad Abū Bakr. (1975). Al-Rūh [The Souls]. Beirut: Dar al -Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.
   45. Ibn Taymiah, Ahmad ‘Abd al-Halim. (1995). Majmū’ al-Fatāwā [The Collections of Fatwa]. Medina: Mujamma’
       al-Malik Fahd.
   46. John Scott. (2007). Fifty Key Sociologists: The Formative Theorists. New York:                         Routledge.
       https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203117279
   47. Kamus Dewan. [Dictionary of Dewan] (2005) ed. 4. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
   48. Mead, M. (1932). An Investigation of the Thought of Primitive Children, With Special Reference to
       Animism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 62, 173-190.
       https://doi.org/10.2307/2843884
   49. Mukhtar Ahmad. (2008). Mu'jam Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Mu'āṣarah [Dictionary of Contemporary Arabic].
       Cairo: Ālam al-Qalam.
   50. Muslim al-Ḥajjāj. (2000). “Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim” in Mawsū’āt al-Ḥadīth al-Sharīf. al-Kutub al-Sittah [Encyclopedia of
       the Hadith- The Six Books] ed. Ṣāliḥ ‘Abd al-ʻAzīz Āl al-Shaykh. Riyadh: Dār al-Salām.
   51. Mustafa Ibrahim, et. al. (nd). Mu’jam al-Lghah al-‘Arabiyyah. [Dictionary of Arabic]. Egypt: Dār al-Da’wah.
   52. N. K. Ryan. (1962). The Cultural Background of the People of Malaya. Kuala Lumpur: Longman.
   53. Nadel, S. F. (1946). A Study Of Shamanism in the Nuba Mountains. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological
       Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 76(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2844307

357 |www.hssr.in                                                                                        © Usman et al.
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews
                                                                     eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 4, 2019, pp 348-358
                                                                            https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7445
   54. Neal, A. G. (1985). Animism and Totemism in Popular Culture. Journal of Popular Culture, 19(2), 15.
       https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.1985.00015.x
   55. Noorkasiani et al. (2009). Sociology of Nursing. Jakarta: Book Publishers Doctoral EGC.
   56. Othman A. (2003). “Masyarakat Pribumi Sarawak” [Sarawak Indigenous Peoples] in Pengajian Tamadun Asia,
       ed. Afifah Abu Yazid. Pahang, PTS Media Group Sdn Bhd.
   57. Paul A. Erickson & Liam D. Murphy. (2013). Readings for a History of Anthropological Theory. Canada:
       University of Toronto Press.
   58. Pedersen, M. A. (2001). Totemism, Animism and North Asian Indigenous Ontologies. Journal of the Royal
       Anthropological Institute, 7(3), 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00070
   59. Perloff, M. (1970). “Angst” and Animism in the Poetry of Sylvia Plath. Journal of Modern Literature, 1(1), 57-
       74.
   60. R. P. Suyono. (2008). The Secret Teachings of Jawa. Jakarta: PT Pelangi LKiS Character.
   61. Rahmat, S. H.(1979). Dari Adam Sampai Muhammad: Sebuah Kajian Mengenai Agama-agama [From Adam to
       Muhammad: A Study of Religions]. Kota Bharu: Pustaka Aman Press.
   62. Roazzi, M., Nyhof, M., & Johnson, C. (2013). Mind, Soul and Spirit: Conceptions of Immaterial Identity in
       Different     Cultures. International     Journal      for     the   Psychology     of   Religion, 23(1),    75-86.
       https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2013.735504
   63. Robert S. Ellwood & Gregory D. Alles. (2009). The Encyclopedia of World Religions. New York: Infobase
       Publishing.
   64. Russell, R. W., & Dennis, W. (1939). Studies in Animism: I. A Standardized Procedure for the Investigation of
       Animism. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 55(2), 389-400.
       https://doi.org/10.1080/08856559.1939.10533203
   65. Shadily, H. (2012). General Encyclopedia. Yogyakarta: Canisius Publisher.
   66. Sillar, B. (2009). The Social Agency of Things? Animism and Materiality in the Andes. Cambridge
       Archaeological Journal, 19(3), 367-377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000559
   67. Stringer, M. D. (1999). Rethinking Animism: Thoughts from the Infancy of Our Discipline. Journal of the Royal
       Anthropological Institute, 5(4), 541-541. https://doi.org/10.2307/2661147
   68. Sutardi, T. (2007). Antropologi Mengungkap Keragaman Budaya [Anthropology: Reveals Cultural Diversity].
       Bandung, Penerbit IPT Setia Puma Inves.
   69. Taylor. B. (2088). Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature. New York: A&C Black.
   70. Turner, T. S. (2009). The Crisis of Late Structuralism. Perspectivism and Animism: Rethinking Culture, Nature,
       Spirit, and Bodiliness. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 7(1), 1.
   71. Weiser Llc. (2010). Encyclopedia of the Unseen World. San Francisco: Constance Victoria Briggs.
   72. William H. Swatos & Peter Kivistö. (1998). Encyclopedia of Religion and Society. New York: Rowman Altamira.

358 |www.hssr.in                                                                                         © Usman et al.
You can also read