The Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Interna Room Men Puncak Jaya Hospital

Page created by Ray Leonard
 
CONTINUE READING
International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research
                                                                          Vol.4; Issue: 2; April-June 2019
                                                                                   Website: www.ijshr.com
Original Research Article                                                                 ISSN: 2455-7587

The Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Interna Room Men Puncak
                              Jaya Hospital
                        Janri Silalahi1, A.L. Rantetampang2, Yermia Msen3, Anwar Mallongi4
         1
          Magister Program of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Cenderawasih University, Jayapura.
 2,3
       Lecturer of Master Program in Public Health. Faculty of Public Health, Cenderawasih University, Jayapura
           4
             Environmental Health Department, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar.
                                          Corresponding Author: Anwar Mallongi

ABSTRACT                                                      Keywords: Satisfaction, Patient, Interna Room
                                                              Men, Hospital
Background: The satisfaction of services from
hospitals can be judge requires adequate                      INTRODUCTION
facilities, infrastructure and attitudes and                          Satisfaction is the level of one's
behavior of health workers in providing                       feelings (customers) after comparing
services. Age and education of patients can                   between performance or perceived results
assess the service they receive, the quality of
                                                              (services received and felt) with what he
service that has less implications for patient
satisfaction.                                                 expected. A service is considered
Objective: To find out the factors that influence             satisfactory if the service can meet the needs
patient satisfaction in the Male Care Room                    and expectations of the client. Satisfaction
Mulia Mulia Hospital, Puncak Jaya Regency"                    in the form of feeling happy or disappointed
Research Method: Analytical with cross                        someone experienced after comparing the
sectional study design. The population was all                perceptions of performance or the results of
patients hospitalized during the months of                    a product with expectations (Nurjannah,
October - December 2018 in the Male Nursing                   2012).
Room in Mulia Jaya Hospital, Puncak Jaya                              Some factors that influence patient
Regency, as many as 109 samples. Data were                    satisfaction,      depending        on        the
obtained using questionnaires and analyzed
                                                              characteristics of the patient include age and
using quare techniques and logistic regression.
Results: Factors that influence patient                       education,       besides      the     facilities,
satisfaction in the Men's Nursing Room Mulia                  infrastructure and attitudes and behaviors of
Hospital in Puncak Jaya Regency are facilities                health officers affect patient satisfaction
(p-value 0.031; Rp: 1.781; CI95% (1,084 -                     such as helping and providing services to
2,927), infrastructure (p-value 0,000; Rp. 4,861;             patients quickly, the ability of officers and
CI95 % (2,758 - 8,570), behavior of health                    the trustworthy nature possessed, the
workers (p-value 0.001; Rp. 2,408; CI95%                      attention of doctors and nurses in providing
(1,586 - 3,657). Factors that not affect patient              services to patients and circumstances. The
satisfaction in the Interna Room Men Mulia                    limitation factors that hospitals have in
Mulia Hospital, Puncak Jaya Regency are age (p                relation to human resources, funds and large
-value 0.388; (RP: 1.293; CI95% (0.808 -
                                                              available facilities are factors that
2.070), education (p-value 1,000; RP: 11.053;
CI95% (0.626 - 1.774), length of stay (p-value                significantly influence patient satisfaction
0.172; Rp. 1.462; CI95%; CI95% (0.903 -                       (Lahinda, 2015; Andriani, 2017).
2,366) The dominant factors that influence the                        The Regional General Hospital is a
satisfaction of male inpatients in Mulia Hospital             type / class D hospital with 65 beds. Mulia
are the facilities, infrastructure, attitudes and             Jaya Hospital in Puncak Jaya Regency is
behavior of health workers.                                   currently in the preparation of accreditation
                                                              which is planned to be implemented in

                International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research (www.ijshr.com)                      11
                                       Vol.4; Issue: 2; April-June 2019
Janri Silalahi et.al. The Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Interna Room Men Puncak Jaya Hospital

2020. One of the demands of accreditation                (Swarjana, 2013). This study was conducted
is increasing patient satisfaction through               to determine the effect of age, education,
improving quality services in accordance                 length of care, facilities, infrastructure,
with standard operating procedures in                    behavior of health workers on patient
providing health services in Mulia Jaya                  satisfaction.
Hospital, Puncak Jaya Regency. Therefore,                2.2. Location and Time of Research
Mulia Hospital in Puncak Jaya Regency is                 The study was conducted at Mulia Hospital
required to be accredited in order to                    and the time of the study was conducted in
improve        adequate       facilities   and           October - November 2018
infrastructure as well as specialist and non-            2.3. Population and Samples
specialist services. The results of                      1. Population
preliminary studies at Mulia Hospital in                 Population is a generalization area
Puncak Jaya Regency, the number of                       consisting of: objects / subjects that have
inpatient visits in 2016 were 2,323 and in               certain qualities and characteristics set by
2017 there were 2,210 people. This visit                 researchers to be studied and then
data showed a decrease in the number of                  conclusions drawn (Sugiyono, 2013). The
patient visits but could not indicate patient            population in this study were all male care
satisfaction.                                            room patients in October - December 2018
         Based on the results of interviews on           as many as 109 people.
the initial data collection in July 2018 of the          2. Samples
five patients, three patients complained                 The sample in this study was the total
about the services provided by health                    patients with the sampling technique in
workers, due to insecurity and lack of                   consecutive sampling, ie patients taken
empathy in serving staff, 2 other patients               during stays in October - December 2018
thought they were not comfortable with the               obtained a sample of 109 people with
conditions and physical facilities, such as              criteria, namely families or patients who
building cleanliness and patient comfort. In             were treated or accompanied by patients at
addition, one informant said that service,               least 1 day.
especially at the counter, was still felt for a
long time due to lack of information which               3. RESULTS
caused the waiting time to be long in patient            Bivariate Analysis
registration.                                            a. Influence of               Age       with      Patient
         Based on this, patient satisfaction             Satisfaction
research as one of the features of hospital              Table 1. Effect of Age with patient satisfaction in the Male
                                                         Care Room of Mulia Hospital in Puncak Jaya Regency in 2018
success is very important, because it can be             No Age            Patient satisfaction
used as feedback and input for improving                                   Not satisfaction satisfy        Number
                                                                           n        %          n    %      n    %
the development of health services. Based                1     < 35 year 20         44,4       25 55,6 45       100
on the description of the problem above, the             2     > 35 year 22         34,4       42 65,6 64       100
                                                         Number            42       38,5       67 61,5 109 100
authors are interested in conducting research            p-value = 0,388; RP: 1,293; CI95% (0,808 – 2,070)
with the title: "Factors that affect patient
satisfaction in the Male Care Room of                    Table 1 shows that of 45 people aged
Janri Silalahi et.al. The Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Interna Room Men Puncak Jaya Hospital

and patient satisfaction in the Male Care                        were 18 people (31.6%) were dissatisfied
Room of Mulia Jaya Hospital, Puncak Jaya                         and respondents who were satisfied were 39
Regency. Prevalence ratio test results (Rp.                      people (66.4%). The results of the chi
1,293; CI95% (0,808 - 2,070) are                                 square test obtained p-value 0.172> α = 0.05
interpreted as not meaningful because the                        which stated that there was no significant
lower values do not reach 1                                      effect between length of stay on patient
                                                                 satisfaction in the Male Care Room of
b. Effect of Education with Patient                              Mulia Jaya Hospital, Puncak Jaya Regency.
Satisfaction                                                     The prevalence ratio test results (RP: 1,462;
Table 2. The Influence of Education with patient satisfaction
in the Male Care Room of Mulia Hospital in Puncak Jaya           CI95% (0,903 - 2,366) are interpreted as
Regency in 2018                                                  meaningless because the lower values do
No Education Patient satisfaction
                   Not satisfaction Satisfy       Number         not include 1.
                   n        %         n     %     n     %
1      High        12       40        18 60       30    100
      (> SMA)                                                    d. Effect of              Facilities       with       Patient
2     Basic        30       38        49 62       79    100      Satisfaction
      (< SMA)                                                    Table 4. The influence of facilities with patient satisfaction in
Number             42       38,5      67 61,5 109 100            the Male Care Room of Mulia Hospital in Puncak Jaya
p-value = 1,000; RP: 1,053; CI95% (0,626 – 1,774)                Regency in 2018
                                                                 No Facilities Patient satisfaction
Table 2 shows that of the 30 people who                                            Not satisfaction Satisfy         Number
                                                                                   n        %          n    %       n      %
were further educated ( α = 0.05 which                           satisfied. Of the 57 respondents who stated
stated that there was no significant effect                      that there were 16 good facilities (28.1%)
between education on patient satisfaction in                     were dissatisfied and 41% of respondents
the Male Care Room of Mulia Jaya                                 were satisfied (71.9%). The results of the
Hospital, Puncak Jaya Regency. The                               chi-square test obtained p-value 0.031  3 days    24       46,2      28 53,8 52        100
2     < 3 days    18       31,6      39 66,4 57        100       e. Influence of Infrastructure with Patient
Number            42       38,5      67 61,5 109 100             Satisfaction
p-value = 0,172; RP: 1,462; CI95% (0,903 – 2,366)                Table 5. Influence of Infrastructure with patient satisfaction in
                                                                 the Male Care Room of Mulia Hospital in Puncak Jaya
Table 3 shows that from 52 people who                            Regency in 2018
                                                                 No Infrastructure Patient satisfaction
were treated for> 3 days, 24 people (46.2%)                                             Not satisfaction Satisfy       Number
were dissatisfied and respondents who were                                              n       %        n     %       n      %
                                                                 1     Less             31      77,5     9     22,5 40        100
satisfied were 28 people (53.8%). Of the 57                      2     Good             11      15,9     58 84,1 69           100
respondents whose length of stay
Janri Silalahi et.al. The Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Interna Room Men Puncak Jaya Hospital

        Table 5 shows that of the 40 people                  4. DISCUSSION
who stated that the infrastructure was less                  4.1 Effect of Age with Patient Satisfaction
than 31 people (77.5%) were not satisfied                             The results of the study showed that
and respondents who were satisfied were 9                    the majority of patients in the Male Care
people (22.5%). Of the 57 respondents who                    Room of Mulia Hospital in Puncak Jaya
stated that there were 16 good facilities                    Regency were mostly middle-aged (> 35)
(28.1%) were dissatisfied and 41% of                         years old (58.7%. This was due to the fact
respondents were satisfied (71.9%). The chi                  that most respondents were patients who
square test results obtained p-value 0,000  35 years old. This research is in
significant effect between infrastructure on                 line with research conducted by Nurhidaya
patient satisfaction in the Male Care Room                   (2014) in Labuang Baji General Hospital
of Mulia Jaya Hospital, Puncak Jaya                          Makassar that the majority of respondents
Regency. Prevalence ratio test results (Rp.                  were in middle-aged (> 35 years). In middle
4,861; CI95% (2,758 - 8,570) interpreted                     adulthood is a productive age, so patient
that the infrastructure that is less likely to be            demands are usually too high (Hatibie,
dissatisfied patients is 4,681 times compared                2015). A mature person will be more
to respondents who state good facilities.                    capable of making decisions, wiser, more
                                                             able to think rationally, more able to control
f. Effect of Behavior of Health Workers                      emotions with age. Age will affect someone
with Patient Satisfaction                                    in decision making. The rational maturity
Table 6. Effects of Behavior of Health Workers on Patient    level possessed by the respondent is the
Satisfaction in the Male Care Room at Mulia Hospital in
Puncak Jaya Regency in 2018                                  capital in considering and thinking about the
No Behavior of        Patient satisfaction                   conditions currently being faced. Rational
      Health          Not satisfaction Satisfy     Number
      Workers         n          %        n   %    n   %     maturity helps respondents to assess
1     Less            17         70,8     7   29,2 24  100   satisfaction with the services used (Dessler,
2     Good            25         29,4     60 70,6 85   100
Number                42         38,5     67 61,5 109 100    2011).
p-value = 0,001; RP: 2,408; CI95% (1,586 – 3,657)                     Satisfaction       responses        of
                                                             respondents aged  35
was less than 17 people (70.8%) were not                     said they were dissatisfied as much as
satisfied and respondents who were satisfied                 34.4% indicating that the same age group
were 7 people (29.2%). Of the 85                             had the same chance of not being satisfied
respondents who stated the behavior of good                  and satisfied with service given at Mulia
health personnel as many as 25 people                        Hospital and from the results of statistical
(29.4%) were not satisfied and respondents                   tests it was stated that there was no effect of
who were satisfied were 60 people (70.6%).                   age on patient satisfaction at Mulia
The chi square test results obtained p-value                 Hospital. The results of previous studies
0.001
Janri Silalahi et.al. The Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Interna Room Men Puncak Jaya Hospital

by what is known by the service that should              knowledge they have. Conversely, if
be obtained from hospital services.                      someone has a low level of education, it will
         The results showed that the majority            hinder the development of the attitude of the
of respondents who were hospitalized in                  person towards the acceptance of
Mulia Hospital, Puncak Jaya Regency, were                information and newly introduced values
36-45 years old, 24 people (33.8%) or in                 (Mubarak, 2011).
middle adulthood and only a few >60 years                         Patients with basic education who
old (3 years old). 4.2%). Patients who were              were dissatisfied were caused by a lack of
more satisfied in patients aged 36-45 years              understanding of the explanations given so
(62.5%) and the lowest satisfaction in                   that there could be a less precise
patients aged >60 years as much as 33.3%.                interpretation of what was said or what was
4.2 Effect of Education with Patient                     seen which caused dissatisfaction with the
Satisfaction                                             nurse's service. Higher educated patients
         The results of the study showed that            tend to have more awareness of health status
most of the patients who were inpatient in               and the consequences of using health
the Manokawari General Hospital had a                    services.
basic education (72.5%). Respondents with                4.3 Effect of Length of Care with Patient
basic education were 40% dissatisfied and                Satisfaction
those with basic education stated that they                       Patients who were long inpatient at
were not as satisfied as 38%. This shows                 Mulia Hospital in Puncak Jaya Regency
that at the level of education the respondent            were 47.7%> 3 days. Respondents who
has the same tendency towards satisfaction               were long hospitalized in the Male Nursing
that he receives at Mulia Hospital.                      Room> 3 days were 46.2% dissatisfied,
         The statistical test results mean that          while those who were treated for
Janri Silalahi et.al. The Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Interna Room Men Puncak Jaya Hospital

assurance, accessibility, responsiveness,                unsatisfactory services, lack of water and
tangible and empathy, (Wijayanti, 2009)                  health facilities are still very limited and
         There is no effect on the duration of           other factors that affect patient satisfaction
treatment due to the first day the patient is            with the services provided by the hospital.
treated to feel the same as patients who have            Along with technological advances in the
been treated for a long time. This equation              fields of medicine and health, the quality of
causes a satisfaction assessment that is not             quality services must also be improved.
different because it is caused by other                  Customer satisfaction or patients are very
factors that influence such as facilities,               important things that cannot be ignored by
infrastructure, as well as officer attitudes             policy makers in the health sector. Water
and health behavior.                                     shortages occur in the RSUD Starting due to
4.4 Effect of Facilities with Patient                    the absence of clean raw water institutions
Satisfaction                                             or managers for the community, where
         A health service must pay attention             water sources are obtained from the river
to the facilities in providing good facilities           and wells. If during the dry season, water
to patients. This is done to attract patients in         resources are obtained less and less, so that
utilizing health services. Hospital service              it affects the water needs of the hospital.
users, in this case patients, demand quality             Only in certain parts are prioritized like the
services not only concerning healing from                operating room.
physical illnesses or improving their health             4.5 Influence of Infrastructure with
status, but also regarding satisfaction with             Patient Satisfaction
attitudes, the availability of adequate                           The Mulia Regional General
facilities and infrastructure and a physical             Hospital continues to develop and equip
environment that can provide comfort. The                health infrastructure in accordance with the
respondent's statement challenged 52.3% of               vision of RSUD Mulia to become the
the facilities available in the Men's Nursing            hospital of choice for the surrounding
Room at RSUD Mulia Hospital, and 47.7%                   community in seeking and obtaining health
said they were lacking. The Respondent,                  services. As time goes by, the RSUD Milia
which stated that the facilities were not the            faces strategic issues, namely not optimal
best, responded to the condition of running              health services; there are still patient
water, the cleanliness of the inpatient room             complaints about existing services, lack of
and the condition of the equipment in the                health service infrastructure. Health service
treatment. Whereas the general information,              infrastructure can be defined as a process of
cleanliness and bedding of all respondents               collaborating effectively and efficiently with
stated well. The results of statistical tests            all health infrastructures to provide
stated that the facilities had an effect on              professional services in the field of facilities
patient satisfaction in the Men's Care Room              and infrastructure in the process of effective
at Mulia Hospital. The results of the                    and efficient health services also.
prevalence ratio test interpreted that the lack          Completeness of good infrastructure is very
of facilities in the inpatient services tended           important in creating customer satisfaction
to be dissatisfied patients at 1,781 times               (Febriani, 2012).
compared to respondents who stated good                           According      to    the     technical
facilities. This study also agrees with                  guidelines for facilities and infrastructure in
previous researchers by Ahmad (2013) who                 general inpatient building, including design
conducted research in the Inpatient Room of              guidelines, inpatient room requirements,
the Regional General Hospital (RSUD)                     technical requirements for inpatient building
Daya Makassar that adequate facilities                   facilities, location, floor plan (minimum
increased patient satisfaction.                          amount of space), building infrastructure
         The problem of facilities in patient            technical requirements, building safety
complaints often occurs because of

            International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research (www.ijshr.com)                       16
                                   Vol.4; Issue: 2; April-June 2019
Janri Silalahi et.al. The Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Interna Room Men Puncak Jaya Hospital

requirements (Ministry of Health, Republic               the behavior of health workers was less as
of Indonesia, 2012).                                     much as 70.8% were dissatisfied and
         Respondents about the condition of              respondents who stated the behavior of
the infrastructure mostly stated good as                 health personnel were good as many as
many as 69 people (63.3%). The good                      29.4% were dissatisfied. The results of
condition of the prescient stated by the                 statistical tests stated that there was a
respondent is the fulfillment of nutritional             significant influence between the behavior
needs for patients, drug service in the                  of health workers with patient satisfaction
pharmacy and administrative procedure                    and from the results of the prevalence ratio
services for patients. While patients who are            test interpreted that the behavior of health
not good are the condition of the equipment              workers who were less likely to be
used by the staff in the service.                        dissatisfied respondents was 2.408 times
         The condition of the equipment at               compared to respondents who stated good
Mulia Hospital is in accordance with                     facilities.
hospital services in the type D category                          Respondents about the behavior of
which is certainly not as complete as the                good health personnel are doctors / health
higher-level sickness. In addition, from                 workers responsive to patient complaints,
some observations that beebraap is part of               skilled in serving patients, speed of action of
the condition of damaged equipment, or                   doctors / officers appropriate in handling
limited other equipment that has an impact               patients who need help, and providing free
on health services optimally.                            time to communicate with patients and
         RSUD Mulia needs to routinely                   provide explanations of medication and
observe its services in order to maintain the            recommend re-check (re-control) if the
strengths that exist and always improve the              complaint continues by providing a
quality of service in variables that are still           guarantee of recovery from service. Besides
lacking in assessment or according to the                the responses of respondents stated that
patient's assessment not as expected by the              doctors / health personnel are patient in
patient, this can be done by paying more                 handling complaints. Respondents about the
attention to the needs and patient's desire,             behavior of health workers is lacking is the
improvement of facilities and infrastructure,            speed of action of doctors / officers in
guarantee of security, comfort, and trust and            accordance in dealing with patients who
the promised service quickly, accurately and             need help and doctors / officers friendly and
surely so that it will increase patient                  polite in providing health services. Based on
satisfaction.                                            observations of patient dissatisfaction that is
4.6 Effects of Behavior of Health                        often found in relation to the attitudes and
Workers with Patient Satisfaction                        behavior of hospital staff due to
         The quality of good service is not              communication        problems,      especially
only measured by the luxury of facilities,               patients from the local area and the low
the completeness of technology and                       education of patients, making it difficult for
physical appearance, but the attitude and                officers to explain the health problems faced
behavior of employees must reflect                       by patients. This has an impact on
professionalism and have high commitment.                respondents' responses to their lack of
In practice, patient satisfaction surveys are            understanding and is impressed that doctors
conducted to improve the hospital                        or other health workers are not friendly.
environment, patient facilities and facilities
in     the    context     of     consumerism.            5. CONCLUSIONS
Effectiveness is measured based on patient               Based on the results of the study, it can be
feedback to improve health service                       concluded as follows
providers' skills and practices that are still           1. There is no significant influence between
controversial. Respondents who stated that               age and patient satisfaction in the Male Care

            International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research (www.ijshr.com)                       17
                                   Vol.4; Issue: 2; April-June 2019
Janri Silalahi et.al. The Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Interna Room Men Puncak Jaya Hospital

Room of Mulia Jaya Hospital in Puncak                        Daerah (RSUD) Daya Makassar. STIKES
Jaya Regency (p-value 0.388; (Rp: 1,293;                     Nani Hasanuddin Makassar.
CI95% (0.808 - 2,070).                                      Alwy SNA (2018). Analisis Kepuasan Pasien
                                                             Rawat Inap di Rumah Sakit Pemerintah
2. There is no significant effect between
                                                             (RSUD                Haji           Makassar).
education on patient satisfaction in the Male                http://www.unhas.ac.id. diakses 20 Januari
Care Room of Mulia Jaya Hospital in                          2019.
Puncak Jaya Regency (p-value 1,000; Rp:                     Andriani A (2017). Pengaruh Mutu
11,053; CI95% (0,626 - 1,774).                               Pelayanan Kesehatan Dengan Kepuasan
3. There is no significant effect between                    Pasien Diruangan Poli Umum Puskesmas
length of stay on patient satisfaction in the                Bukittinggi. Journal Endurance 2(1) February
Male Care Room of Mulia Jaya Hospital in                     2017 (45-52).
                                                            Azwar, A. (2010). Pengantar Administrasi
Puncak Jaya Regency (p-value 0.172; Rp.
                                                             Kesehatan. Pustaka Sinar Harapan Jakarta.
1.462; CI95% (0.903 - 2,366).                               Anjaryani. WD, (2009), Kepuasan Pasien
4. There is a significant influence between                  Rawat Inap Terhadap Pelayanan Perawat di
the facilities on patient satisfaction in the                RSUD           Tugu        Rejo     Semarang.
Male Care Room of Mulia Jaya Hospital in                     http//eprints.undip.ac.id/23824/1 pdf.
Puncak Jaya Regency (p-value 0.031; Rp:                     Chairunnisa (2015). Gambaran Kepuasan
1.781; CI95% (1,084 - 2,927).                                Pasien Rawat Jalan terhadap Pelayanan di
5. There is a significant influence between                  Rumah Sakit Islam Jakarta Sukapura (RSIJS).
                                                             Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta. Jurnal
infrastructure on patient satisfaction in the                Kedokteran dan Kesehatan, Vol.13, No. 1,
Male Care Room of Mulia Jaya Hospital in                     Januari 2017.
Puncak Jaya Regency (p-value 0,000; Rp.                     Bustami (2012). Penjamin Mutu Pelayanan
4,861; CI95% (2,758 - 8,570).                                Kesehatan & Akseptabilitasnya. Erlangga,
6. There is a significant influence between                  Jakarta.
the behavior of health workers on patient                   Cahyadi SR, Mudayana AA (2014). Pengaruh
satisfaction in the Male Care Room in Mulia                  Mutu Pelayanan dengan Kepuasa Pasien di
Jaya Hospital, Puncak Jaya Regency (p-                       Rumah        sakit    PKU       Muhammadiyah
                                                             Yogyakarta Unit I [Skripsi]. Universitas
value 0.001; Rp. 2.408; CI95% (1,586 -                       Ahmad Dahlan.
3,657).                                                     Data Rekam Medik RSUD Mulia Kabupaten
                                                             Puncak Jaya tahun 2017
REFERENCES                                                  Dewi M (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas
 Abdilah AD. (2013). Pengaruh Karakteristik                 Pelayanan terhadap Kepuasan Pasien
   Pasien Dengan Kepuasan Pasien Rawat Jalan                 Pengguna BPJS pada Rumah Sakit
   Di Puskesmas Sindangkerta Kabupaten                       Rehabilitasi Medik Kabupaten Aceh Timur.
   Bandung Barat. Jurnal Kesehatan Kartika                   Jurnal Manajemen Dan Keuangan, VOL.5,
   Stikes A. Yani.                                           NO.2, November 2016
 Adhyto        DR.      (2013).     Reliabilitas           Febriani VA, 2012, Analisis Pengaruh
   Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Pasien Terhadap                     Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Konsumen
   Pelayanan Kesehatan Di Salah Satu                         (Studi pada Pasien Poliklinik Rawat Jalan
   Puskesmas Kabupaten Ngawi. GASTER Vol.                    Rumah Sakit Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo),
   10       No.      2       Agustus      2013.              http://eprints.undip.ac.id/26970/
   http://www.stikesaisyah.co.id.  diakses      2           Fidia (2014). Kepuasan Pasien Dalam
   Agustus 2018.                                             Pelayanan                           Kesehatan.
 Agung M (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas                          http://metrotvnews.com.
   Pelayanan Keperawatan, Fasilitas Dan Minat               Fitia, L. (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan
   Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Di Ruang Rawat                   Keperawatan Dengan Kepuasan Pasien
   Inap RSU Wisata UIT Makassar. Jurnal Mirai                Rawat Inap Di Rumah Sakit Rachma Husada
   Management, Volume 1 Nomor 2, Oktober                     Bantul. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan
   2016.                                                     Jendral Achmad Yani Yogyakarta 2017
 Ahmad F (2013). Pengaruh Sarana Prasarana,                Handayani, SE. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh
   Prosedur Penerimaan Pasien, Pelayanan                     Karakteristik Pasien Terhadap Kepuasan
   Perawat Terhadap Tingkat Kepuasan Pasien                  Pasien Dalam Hal Mutu Pelayanan
   Di Ruang Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit Umum

            International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research (www.ijshr.com)                       18
                                   Vol.4; Issue: 2; April-June 2019
Janri Silalahi et.al. The Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Interna Room Men Puncak Jaya Hospital

      Kesehatan di Unit Rawat Inap Puskesmas                   Reyhan, A. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh
      Maos            Kabupaten             Cilacap.            Kualitas      Pelayanan,       Fasilitas,     Dan
      http://www.undip.co.id. Diakses 20 Maret                  Kepercayaan Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen
      2018.                                                     (Studi pada Perusahaan Cito Laboratorium
     Hastuti KW (2017). Pengaruh Mutu                          Klinik Semarang Cabang Indraprasta).
      Pelayanan dengan Kepuasan Pasien Peserta                  http://www.undip.co.id. diakses 20 April
      BPJS di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah                           2018.
      Yogyakarta. Kes Mas: Jurnal Fakultas                     Rizkia E (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas
      Kesehatan Masyarakat Volume 11, Issue 2,                  Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien (Studi
      September 2017, pp. 165 ~ 173 ISSN: 1978 -                pada pasien rawat jalan peserta BPJS
      0575                                                      Kesehatan di RSUD Al Ihsan Kabupaten
     Hatmoko.     (2006).     Sistem    Pelayanan              Bandung). e-Proceeding of Management :
      Kesehatan Dasar Puskesmas. E-book                         Vol.4, No.2 Agustus 2017 | Page 1838.
      http://www.freewebtown.com. diakses 11                   Ruditya AN (2015). Pengaruh Karakteristik
      Maret 2016).                                              Individu Terhadap Penilaian Kualitas Produk
     _____Kemenkes RI. (2011). Berita Kesehatan                Apotek Rawat Jalan. Jurnal Administrasi
      Masyarakat.        (online:       http://www.             Kesehatan Indonesia Volume 3 Nomor 2 Juli-
      kemenkesri.go.diakses 11 Februari 2018.                   Desember 2015.
     Khoiri AN (2015). Pengaruh Mutu Pelayanan                Sangadji, EM. (2015). Perilaku Konsumen.
      Keperawatan Dengan Kepuasan Pasien                        Pendekatan Praktis. Andi, Jakarta.
      Pengguna Kartu BPJS Kesehatan di                         Sareong, KM. (2013) Faktor Yang
      Puskesmas Mojowarno Kabupaten Jombang.                    Berpengaruh Dengan Kepuasan Pasien Rawat
     Kusumparadja, R. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh                Jalan di Puskesmas Rantepao Kabupaten
      Antara Kualitas Pelayanan, Karakteristik                  Toraja Utara. http://www.unhas.co.id. diakses
      Pasien, dan Hambatan Pindah Loyalitas                     2 Agustus 2018.
      Pasien Rawat Jalan RSUD Cibinong. Forum                  Swarjana       (2013).     Metode       Penelitian
      Ilmiah Volume 10 Nomor 1, Januari 2013 64.                Kesehatan. Nuha Medika, Yogyakarta.
     Kurniawan A., Intiasari AD (2012). Pengaruh              Supartiningsih (2016). Kualitas Pelayanan
      Karakteristik Pasien Terhadap Indeks                      Kepuasan Pasien Rumah Sakit: Kasus Pada
      Kepuasan Masyarakat Tentang Pelayanan                     Pasien Rawat Jalan Solichah. Jurnal
      Rawat Jalan Puskesmas Banyumas. Jurnal                    Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah
      Kesmasindo. Volume 5, Nomor 2, Juli 2012,                 Sakit, 6 (1): 9-15, Desember 2018.
      hlm. 169- 179.                                            http://journal.umy.ac.id/index. php /mrs DOI:
     Nurkholiq, S. (2011). Perbandingan Tingkat                10.18196/jmmr.6122.
      Kepuasan Pasien Umum Dengan Penggunaan                   Wijayanti,LP, (2009). Analisa Faktor Penentu
      Kartu Askes di Pelayanan Dokter Keluarga                  Tingkat Kepuasan Pasien di Rumah Sakit
      PT Askes. Universitas Diponegoro.                         PKU Muhammadiah Bantul. http://Journal
     Oroh, M. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Yang                       .uii.ac.id/index.php/jkkl /article/files/544/468.
      Berpengaruh Dengan Tingkat Kepuasan
      Pasien Rawat Inap Terhadap Pelayanan                  How to cite this article: Silalahi J, Rantetampang
      Keperawatan Di Ruang Interna Rsud                     AL, Msen Y et.al. The factors influencing patient
      Noongan. http://www.unsrat.co.id. diakses 20          satisfaction in interna room men Puncak Jaya
      Desember 2018.                                        hospital. International Journal of Science &
     Prayitno. (2014) Kompas (2013). Kepuasan              Healthcare Research. 2019; 4(2): 11-19.
      Pasien.                 http://www.kesehatan.
      kompas.com/2018.
     Rahmayanty,     N.     (2010).    Manajemen
      pelayanan Prima Mencegah Pembelotan dan
      Membangun Customer. Jakarta: Salemba
      Medika.

                                                     ******

               International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research (www.ijshr.com)                        19
                                      Vol.4; Issue: 2; April-June 2019
You can also read