The Coalition's Direct Action plan The Federal election result: critical insights for managing carbon and energy - Dr Peter Holt
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The Coalition’s Direct Action plan The Federal election result: critical insights for managing carbon and energy Dr Peter Holt
Today we will talk about • What has happened since Saturday 7 September? – what are the implementation pathways? • What is Direct Action? What is the Emissions Reduction Fund? • What are the business implications? – risks from changes in policy – financial implications – climate change remains a business issue • What you should do now
A Coalition majority in the lower house What’s happening in the Senate? How does the parliament make up impact Direct Action?
Repealing the carbon tax Timeline Senate balance of power Likely outcome Now – Labor and the Greens control The Clean Energy Act to 1 July 2014 the Senate continue Post The Coalition will need the Negotiations with new 1 July 2014 agreement of at least six of minor parties in the Senate the eight minor party will be critical to ensure the representatives to repeal the passage of legislation. Clean Energy Future legislation and implement Direct Action. Double dissolution looking unlikely ......if it did happen it won’t be until September 2014.
Senate - balance of power Party Senate seats – commencing 1 July 2014 Liberal/National Party 33 Australian Labor Party 25 Australian Greens 10 Others - minor parties 8 The election has surprised with the strong showing of new minor parties, with up to eight Senate representatives: Minor party Position on carbon tax Democratic Labor Party, Palmer United Party (three senators), Liberal Democrats, Australian Against - 7 Motoring Enthusiast Party, Family First Nick Xenophon Unknown – 1
Repealing the Clean Energy legislative package removes…. The carbon price mechanism including: • the fixed price (subject to timing) • carbon (emissions) trading from 1 July 2015 The Clean Energy Finance Corporation Associated grant based programs including: • Clean Technology Investment Program CTIP • Clean Technology Innovation Program • Steel Transformation Package • Coal Sector Jobs Package The Jobs and Assistance compensation package which incorporates assistance for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) companies.
Possible pathways Direct Action Clean Energy Act ALP / Greens controlled 1 July 2014 Senate Retrospective Direct legislation Carbon price Transition to ETS/ Action required to New Senate remains and flexible price backcommences date? escalates to $25.40 period. Carbon minority Carbon price on 1 July 2014. price reduces to repealed party Transitions to ETS ~$6-10 AUD controlled 1 July 2015 1 July 2015
Direct Action plan (2010 edition) Direct industry action through an Emissions Reduction Fund A focus on soil carbon Reducing CO2 emissions in the electricity sector Boosting renewable energy especially solar Support for emerging technologies through the Renewable Energy Target (RET)
The Emissions Reduction Fund Emissions Reduction Fund will seek projects that: 1. reduce CO2 emissions [efficacy] 2. deliver additional practical environmental benefits [co-benefits] 3. not result in price increases to consumers [cost neutral] 4. protect Australian jobs [productivity] 5. not otherwise proceed without Fund assistance [additionality] Funding in the Coalition budget Year Funding 2014-15 $300m 2015-16 $500m 2016-17 $750m .....but no details. This help businesses participate in policy development.
Emissions Reduction Fund could be... Emissions Reduction Fund Voluntary Liable entities? $2.55B over four years participation? EITE companies? Project-based NGER-based CDM-like mechanism for Kyoto Baseline and incentives Emissions units .... with penalties trading? - project baseline and offsets Poor performer - expanded CFI? Penalties Emissions Baseline profile Incentives Or a program similar to CTIP? Efficient performer “Voluntary” participation “Compulsory” participation
What are the business implications?
Establishment and definition of baseline and credit Baseline setting • Uncertainty as to how the baselines will be set and defined. Will it be at industry level? Operations level? Activity level? • Penalties. What level will they be set? Poor performers may have to pay. Benchmarking Energy KPI - all mine types 600.0 Poor Additionality performers may 500.0 have to pay. • Demonstrating that offsets MJ per Saleable Tonne 400.0 are beyond BAU 300.0 Where do you sit on your emissions profile? 200.0 Have you benchmarked 100.0 against your peers and 0.0 competitors? 20 24 25 27 11 33 22 23 29 10 12 30 14 26 18 21 28 19 17 32 31 1 2 4 7 8 5 6 3 9 ACME Site Identifier
Financial risks Budget for carbon price as a contingency • FY14 – fixed price $24.15/t CO2-e • FY15 – fixed price $25.40/t CO2-e Uncertainty of carbon cost in future energy supply contracting • Terms of existing retail contracts need to be reviewed for carbon scheme change/removal triggers. • Direct Action may still have some impact on market prices. • What emission and demand reduction incentives will be available to customers from generators and retailers? • How will RET and state white certificate schemes change?
Climate change remains a business issue International obligations - NGO Kyoto campaigns protocol across the Shifts in supply weather chain patterns Source: Climate Commission http://climatecommission.gov.au/report/the-angry-summer/ Tiny Bulga wins day against mining Climate Goliath Local change community Gas challenges prices are on the rise Investor relations http://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/tiny- bulga-wins-day-against-mining-goliath-20130415- 2hw5n.html Source: Manufacturing Australia citing ACIL Tasman forecasts
What should your business do now?
Participate in the Coalition’s white paper process Business response: develop a clear position on Direct Action including establishment of emissions baselines to ensure your business’ views are captured.
Key messages for business Timing – need to act quickly Participate in the Direct Action white paper process • Develop your position on Direct Action • Understand your emissions profile and how this is benchmarked to your peers Understand any shifts in your risk profile • Financial risks – potential costs and budget positions – current emissions abatement projects • Carbon inclusive / exclusive clauses in energy contracts Re-evaluate your position in the market place
We can help Dr Gordon Weiss Emma Fagan NSW and ACT Vic Principal Consultant Consultant Government 03 9691 5500 02 9929 3911 Dr Peter Holt NSW and Qld Principal Consultant, Follow us Carbon Strategy Twitter @energetics_au 02 9929 3911 Linkedin.com/company/energetics-pty-ltd Brian Innes WA Group General Manager, Resources and Industry 08 9429 6400
Questions to consider for the White Paper Should organisations be able to purchase Is there a way for the reverse auction to abatement in the reverse auction as a means provide good guidance to participants without of offsetting likely penalties for exceeding encouraging rorting? their baseline? Should the methodologies normalise emission Baselines at the industry level will be easier to reductions based on the probability of implement and manage than baselines set at success and sustainability of the measure? the corporation level, but will see winners and losers. Which provides the most effective How can the methodologies deal with outcome? additionality without making the reverse auction impractical? Does the precedent of the industry level baselines used to determine EITE How can the Fund best reproduce the impact compensation provide a good model for the of grant based schemes such as CTIP without Emissions Reduction Fund? risking funding projects that ultimately don’t deliver the abatement? How can the baselines incorporate meaningful specific energy intensities to deal with Should businesses be able to sell future changes in throughput and product mix at the abatement through the reverse auction despite industry level? exceeding their baseline? What is the best means of encouraging poor performing businesses to undertake abatement activities?
You can also read