Stichting Coffee Agronomy Training - Report of Activities 2020 (also known as Coffee Agronomy Training Foundation or CAT Foundation) - ANBI.nl
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Report of Activities 2020 Stichting Coffee Agronomy Training (also known as Coffee Agronomy Training Foundation or CAT Foundation)
About the CAT Foundation The Coffee Agronomy Training (CAT) Foundation works to improve the livelihoods of poor smallholder coffee farmers in developing countries through training and capacity building on Good Agricultural Practices - increasing coffee yields through higher productivity and improving quality. Agronomy training can substantially benefit smallholder farmers for relatively low investment in terms of time and money. It provides a cost-efficient way to begin improving smallholder income and wellbeing. And it allows to reach many farmers in a relatively short amount of time. The CAT Foundation works with partners who conduct locally relevant field-based, practical and participatory agronomy training to interested smallholder coffee farmers in selected coffee growing areas. To hold the Foundation accountable to the impact achieved and to generate additional insights into effective approaches to offer support to coffee farmers, the CAT Foundation rigorously monitors and evaluates program activities across 3 key components: monitoring, best practice evaluation and/or randomized controlled trials (RCT). Partners Hanns R. Neumann Stiftung (HRNS) was founded in 2005 by Michael R. Neumann and his family. Building on the deep family history of working side-by-side with smallholder coffee farmers as green coffee traders. The objectives of the foundation are livelihood improvement in tropical rural environments, youth projects as well as nature and the environment. TechnoServe was founded in 1968 by Ed Bullard. The organization works with enterprising people in the developing world to build competitive farms, businesses and industries. Coffee being one of the focus area, TechnoServe is helping to build a sustainable global coffee industry that can lift millions of farming families out of poverty Precision Agriculture for Development (PAD) is a US-based non-profit organization with a mission to support smallholder farmers in developing countries by providing customized information and services to increase productivity, profitability, and environmental sustainability. Michael Kremer is the Gates Professor of Developing Societies at Harvard University, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and a 2019 co- recipient of the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a recipient of a MacArthur Fellowship and a Presidential Faculty Fellowship, and was named a young global leader by the World Economic Forum. His recent research examines education and health in developing countries, immigration, and globalization. Michael Kremer leads the RCT evaluating the impact of the Uganda Coffee Agronomy Training Program. Vivian Hoffmann, IFPRI is a research economist. The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) provides research-based policy solutions to sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition in developing countries. Vivian's research mainly focuses on child health, food safety, and agricultural productivity in Eastern Africa. Vivian Hoffmann leads the RCT together with Michael Kremer. 2
Laterite is a data, research and technical advisory firm that helps clients understanding and analyse complex development challenges. Laterite is our key partner responsible for the data collection throughout the RCT. Impact Atlas is a real-time intelligence platform built to transform the way social programs are managed and financed. HRNS is using Impact Atlas to track farmers progress through their training program. From registration to training attendance, curriculum completion and the adoption of best practices on individual farms, field staff are able to access, adapt and learn from the data in real time. Crop Nutrition Laboratory Services (CROPNUTS) is East Africa’s leading accredited agricultural laboratory and agronomy services company. It offers lab testing services and independent agronomy services to farmers, commercial businesses, agricultural research institutions and NGOs. CropNuts helps the program to give customized fertilizer recommendations based on soil & lead analysis conducted on site. JDE Peet’s is the world's largest pure-play coffee and tea company by revenue and served approximately 4,500 cups of coffee or tea every second in 2020. JDE Peet's unleashes the possibilities of coffee and tea in more than 100 developed and emerging markets, through a portfolio of over 50 brands that collectively cover the entire category landscape led by leading household names such as L’OR, Peet’s, Jacobs, Senseo, Tassimo, Douwe Egberts, OldTown, Super, Pickwick and Moccona. In 2020, JDE Peet’s generated total sales of EUR 6.7 billion and employed a global workforce of more than 19,000 employees. JDE Peet’s supports the CAT Foundation through funding and project management support. Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) is a leading beverage company in North America, with annual revenue in excess of $11 billion and nearly 27,000 employees. KDP holds leadership positions in soft drinks, specialty coffee and tea, water, juice and juice drinks and mixers, and markets the #1 single serve coffee brewing system in the U.S. and Canada. KDP is committed to sourcing, producing and distributing its beverages responsibly through its Drink Well. Do Good. corporate responsibility platform, including efforts around circular packaging, efficient natural resource use and supply chain sustainability. KDP supports the CAT Foundation through funding and project management support. 3
Background and Introduction The CAT Foundation’s current program activities focus on smallholder coffee farmers in Uganda. More than 70 per cent of Ugandans work in agriculture, making this the sector of highest economic importance. Within agriculture, coffee plays a major role as it is the main cash crop and source of income for over 1.5 million coffee producing households and the main contributor (approx. 20%) to export earnings for the Government. However, most coffee producers, being smallholders, face several key challenges which severely limit their agricultural development potential due to lack of training on how best to improve production of coffee (through Good Agricultural Practices). In addition, over the last decade the effects of climate change have also become increasingly damaging for coffee production with farmers lacking adaptation skills, such as soil water conservation and climate change adaption. 2020 CAT Foundation Projects and Activities To help farmers and households earn better incomes via improved production of coffee the Foundation has developed various projects. Accompanying the project activities is a rigorous evaluation component to better document the impact of the projects, i.e. analyzing whether farmers who receive quality training have increased production and higher income generated from coffee as compared to farmers that do not receive any training. To make the evaluation of the project interventions scientifically robust, the projects are divided in cohorts where the first cohorts serve as a learning cohort to inform the operational design of the following cohorts. A randomized control trial (RCT) accompanies the second cohort to assess the impact of agronomy training on the yields of participating coffee farmers. As of end of 2020 the following projects below were running. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda, the setup, operation, and activities of the projects had to be adjusted as outlined below. • The first case of COVID-19 was registered in March 2020, the first official Covid-19 related death in July 2020. • Strict lockdown measures introduced gradually in March and April 2020 incl. border closure, ban on private and public transport, curfew, school closures, ban on social gatherings, mandatory use of masks in public. • Country borders reopened in October 2020. • Measures were gradually relaxed allowing businesses to operate as well as public and private transport following Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) developed by the Ministry of Health (MoH). • Schools have remained closed (apart from candidate classes) and are expected to reopen in March 2021. • As of February 5th, 2021 Uganda, has registered 39,842 cumulative cases of Covid-19. 4
A. Hanns R. Neumann Stiftung (HRNS): Uganda Agronomy Training Program Despite all disruptions made by COVID-19, Cohort 1 activities came to a successful close at the end of October 2020 having started in April 2018. In Kakumiro district, where Cohort 1 interventions were implemented, 13,069 households registered of whom 12,848 remained active from start to end. In total, 13,660 training sessions were offered, and 11,022 (86%) farming households attended each of the training topics that were covered by extension workers at least once. In Cohort 2, trainings are still ongoing and so far, 6,110 (62%) households have completed the curriculum. The two-year training program is scheduled to end in mid-2021. Cohort 1 Cohort 2 2019 2020 2019 2020 Farming HH-Active Members 12,902 12,848 9,926 9,855 Producer Groups/FFB 603 603 495 495 Field Officers 6 6 8 8 Field Extensionists 62 62 78 78 Contact Farmers 603 603 495 495 It is worth mentioning that in Uganda traditionally the man is considered head of household hence a household is considered female headed when a woman is not married, divorced or a widow, therefore this is not a good representation of the level of participation of women in the program. To determine that, female attendance rates are a better indicator and will be discussed further in this report. Male Headed Female Headed Total Households Households Households Cohort 1 11,137 (87%) 1,711 (13%) 12,848 Cohort 2 8,376 (85%) 1,479 (15%) 9,855 Total 19,513 (86%) 3,190 (14%) 22,703 Due to design implications of the accompanying impact evaluation through the RCT, Cohort 2 targets fewer beneficiaries but covers a vast area that stretches over three districts. The map shows the spread of villages in Cohort 2: in blue the RCT treatment villages and in red the non-RCT villages, with different geographical areas. Distribution of RCT and Non-RCT Villages in Cohort 2 5
Best Practice Adoption for Cohort 1 Households in Kakumiro • Laterite collected baseline data between November 2018 – April 2019, and endline data between August 2020 – October 2020, with 20 months between baseline and endline. • In Kakumiro district, many farmers had abandoned coffee before the UCAT program started. Now the focus is on rejuvenation, pruning and correct intercropping. As shown in the analysis, these are the practices with the most significant increase in adoption levels. • Integrated Pest and Disease Management (IPDM) was seen by farmers as important to prevent and control pest and disease outbreaks, which are becoming more common with increasing temperatures and rainfall. Cultural (non-chemical) methods have been promoted in order to limit the use of chemicals due to health and environmental risks, high costs of pesticides and limited access to genuine products. • While adoption of weeding appears to have decreased between baseline and endline, a comparison over a one-year period (August 2019 – October 2019 and August 2020 – October 2020) shows a slight increase in the level of adoption from 32% to 34%. Seasonality may be an influencing factor. Baseline vs. Endline Best Practice Adoption 90% 80% 74% 76% 76% 71% 70% 65% 59% 59% 60% 53% 50% 50% 40% 36% 34% 34% 32% 30% 24% 24% 19% 20% 15% 16% 10% 0%0% 0%2% 0% Baseline Endline 6
B. TechnoServe (TNS): Uganda Coffee Farm College Program TechnoServe’s UCAT Coffee Farm College Program is a four-year training program that aims to improve incomes for 30,000 coffee farming households in Central and Western Uganda by increasing their coffee farm productivity. This will be achieved by promoting improved coffee agronomic practices at the farm level through a structured, farm-based training program and the improvement of coffee farmers' access to recommended inputs. The Coffee Farm College trainings are conducted by locally recruited and trained farmer trainers (FTs). It is expected that up to 60% of the target households will adopt at least half of the coffee best practices, which will translate to at least 50% increase in coffee yields. To validate the impact of the program on yield increase, a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) accompanies the program. Overall, the program include threes distinct cohorts: • Cohort I launched in August 2018 and ended in October 2021. It achieved its life of project target training 6,161 coffee farming households in Sembabule District, of which 39% are female. This cohort has served as a learning cohort to inform the operational design of the following two larger cohorts. A randomized control trial (RCT) design was piloted among Cohort I farmers in preparation for the full RCT in Cohort II. • Cohort II launched in August 2019 in the southwestern districts of Mbarara, Sheema, Ntungamo, and Bushenyi. Of the 18,686 farmers trained, 43% were female. The RCT is running in this cohort, which includes 180 treatment and 180 control villages which are spaced at least 1.9km apart across Sheema, Mbarara, and Ntungamo. The control villages and many intervening villages in these districts will not receive the Farm College program. Bushenyi District is not required for the RCT, so the usual Farm College training program is implemented for every coffee village. • Cohort III will launched in early 2021, delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and aims to train 12,000 coffee households. UCAT Cohorts I, II and III training program locations 8
Training during the Covid-19 pandemic Between January and late March 2020, UCAT implemented the Coffee Farm College modules for Cohort I and II as planned. However, soon after the first case of COVID-19 was detected in Uganda on March 22, 2020, the government instituted a nationwide lockdown and all program activities were suspended for approximately two months. While the lockdown was in place, between late March and May, the UCAT provided technical support to farmers through phone calls and SMS messages. The SMS messages and phone calls proved to be effective measures for virtually providing technical assistance to farmers. During the phone calls, the farmer trainers learned about challenges farmers faced with implementing soil nutrition recommendations, farmers explained they had limited access to the materials and labor required for composting and found inorganic fertilizers to be expensive. Some lockdown restrictions were lifted in late May and the team conducted on-farm trainings for individual farmers between June and September. The program received government permission to train farmers in small groups of up to five households for the month of October. Finally, additional COVID-related restrictions were lifted in November and larger gatherings were permitted. This change permitted the team to conduct trainings with up to 20 households in November and December. Cohort 1 results The program successfully completed Cohort I of the Coffee Farm College in Sembabule District in October 2020. A total of 20 training sessions were held, delivering 14 topics between August 2018 and October 2020. A total of 6,161 out of 8,262 of registered households attended at least half of the 14 topics and are considered “trained”, exceeding the project target of 6,000 trained households. Of the total farmers trained, 39% were female. A Best Practice Adoption Endline Survey was conducted by, Laterite, in close collaboration with UCAT’s field-based evaluation staff. The survey returned to the 600 randomly selected coffee households assessed at baseline in 2018. 9
Cohort 1 household characteristics 10
Case Study 11
Summary of key results Key Performance Indicators Results of Results of Indicator Definition Target Dec 2019 Dec 2020 Farming households Number of farming households that 38,000 24,449 27,261 reached register to participate in the project Number of farming households that Farming households attend at least half of the Coffee Farm 30,000 18,964 21,771 trained College good agricultural practice topics (trained) Number of farming households 2018 Cohort I 6,000 5,318 6,161 trained in Cohort I Number of farming households 2019 Cohort II 12,000 13,646 15,610 trained in Cohort II Number of farming households 2020 Cohort III 12,000 N/A N/A trained in Cohort III Percent of trained households that adopt at least half of the taught best 60% N/A 35% practices on their coffee farms Adoption rate Households adopting two or more additional best practices at endline N/A N/A 48% compared to baseline Average yield per tree amongst trained households increase by 50% in To be To be Yield increase the harvest one year following 50% measured measured program cohort, following two years in 2021 in 2021 of support Farmer Trainers with Number of Farmer Trainers hired from mastery of coffee local communities who have mastered 114 75 75 4 agronomy and coffee agronomy and training skills 3 training skills Number of farmer groups organized for training. Each FFG consists of up to Focal Farmer Groups 30 farming households and an elected 1,365 845 1,424 6 (FFGs) organized Focal Farmer and Assistant Focal Farmer5 Number of demonstration plots, each Suitable consisting of 40 trees, identified as demonstration plots sites for delivery of training and 1,365 845 1,424 6 identified demonstration of best agronomic practices to FFGs 1 Result includes Cohort I and Cohort II registered farmers. The launch of the Cohort III CFC was delayed due to COVID. 2 Result from the Cohort I best practice endline survey. 3 Note this excludes Farmer Trainers hired for control groups. 4 Cohort III FTs were hired in Jan 2021 and will be included in the next narrative report. 5 Note this excludes Focal Farmer Groups organized for the control areas. 6 Includes total number of FFGs formed by late January 2021 for Cohort III (579) 12
C. Precision Agriculture for Development (PAD) Introduction Precision Agriculture for Development is responsible for the ICT components of the Uganda Coffee Agronomy Training (UCAT) program and accompanying randomized control trial (RCT). In 2020, PAD continued monitoring and improving its two-way IVR platform based on push calls and a dynamic IVR menu to disseminate information on best coffee agricultural practices. 2020 Achievements – “stand-alone” program Throughout the period of interest, PAD has closely monitored the progress of the stand-alone and reinforcement groups. In the stand-alone group, farmers only receive information on best coffee agricultural practices through their phones. In the reinforcement groups, some participants of the HRNS and TNS training programs receive calls that reinforce the in-person training. Specifically, PAD monitors (i) how often a farmer picks up the phone when receiving a push call and (ii) when the farmer answers, how long they stay on the line to listen to the audio recording. The figure below shows the distribution of the weekly pick-up rate overtime for the period March 2020 – February 2021 for weeks where IVR calls were pushed. With few exceptions, the pick-up rate followed a relatively constant trend, ranging from 62 to 74%, for an average of 66%. The lower pickup rates in weeks 1, 11, 12, and 30 reflect network failures that prevented all users from receiving their push calls. Ignoring these four weeks where technical issues arose, the pick-up rate has been close to that recorded in 2019, though slightly lower (69% against 72%). Figure - Weekly pick-up and completion rates The second figure reports the change in the completion rate over time. The completion rate is defined as the share of users who listened to the entire message, conditional on having picked up the call. The completion rate followed a sustainable path over the period of interest, with 64% of users listening to the entire message on average. Similar to the distribution of the pick-up rate, the few drops in the completion rates are due to technical issues. The slight reduction observed towards the end of the year from week 41 to week 45 corresponds to the month of January during which presidential elections were held, and significant disruptions of the internet network were observed. 2020 achievements – “Reinforcement” group Farmers in the reinforcement group, who are attending field-based training, receive an ICT-based intervention also using IVR technology. This sub-sample of farmers attending FFS receives push calls with recordings reinforcing the material they studied during FFS the month before. These push calls come in the form of two-minute recordings pushed weekly or monthly to the farmer. The 13
reinforcement sample is comprised of approximately half of the farmers from all UCAT treatment villages. Technoserve has 1,363 farmers and spouses representing 968 households and HRNS has 1,243 farmers and spouses representing 962 households. This represents a total of 2,606 farmers and spouses or 1,930 households. HRNS reinforcement farmers' pick-up rate followed a similar trend to that of their stand-alone counter- parts, ranging from 59% to 71% if one excludes weeks 1, 11, 12 and 30. HRNS farmers receive two to four push calls per month. In the case of Technoserve, farmers received substantially fewer push calls once a month. The average pick-up rate of TechnoServe farmers (80%) is significantly higher than of HRNS (66%). The 14% point gap is mostly due to lower listening fatigue amongst TechnoServe farmers. In terms of completion rates, 69% of HRNS farmers listened to the entire IVR message on average, with minor variations over time (Figure 5), while 64% of TechnoServe farmers listened to the full message on average (Figure 6). Figure - Reinforcement pick-up rates Figure - Reinforcement completion rates 14
Case Study: Who’s Talking? A/B Test With Varying Narrator Gender to Enhance User Engagement Design The objective of this A/B test was to study whether switching from receiving messages voiced by a narrator who matches the user's gender to messages voiced by a narrator from the opposite gender affects UCAT stand-alone farmers' engagement with the platform. Farmers were randomly allocated to three different groups: (i) a control group where the voice of the narrator did not change, (ii) a group where the IVR voice was switched from not matching to matching the user's gender, and (iii) a group where the IVR voice was switched from matching to not matching the user's gender. The experiment ran for eight weeks, starting in October 2020. Results This study found that switching the message content from being voiced by a male to being voiced by a female narrator positively and sustainably increases the probability that female farmers pick up IVR calls. In contrast, no effect was found on male farmers. Switching from a female to a male narrator reduced male farmers' listening rate, while the opposite holds when switching from a male to a female narrator. In the case of female farmers, switching from a male to a female narrator increased the listening rate. This study's findings suggested that both male and female UCAT farmers were more sensitive to messages voiced by a female narrator. Therefore, from the completion of this experiment, only female narrators were hired to voice new content. In addition to project-based implications, the results of this experiment also contributed to increase the body of evidence around the impact of narrator gender on IVR platform user engagement in general. This study’s findings, together with other research results, were published in a PAD blogpost on whether farmers act differently when they hear a woman’s voice giving them. See https://precisionag.org/varying-narrator-gender-to-enhance-user-engagement/ D. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Uganda Coffee Agronomy Training Impact Evaluation - Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Part of the scientific evidence on the impact of agronomy training on smallholders’ coffee yields is lacking. The Foundation and its partners are working to improve this through a large-scale, randomized evaluation of agronomy training implemented by TNS and HRNS and with the ICT of PAD. RCT activities during 2020 focus on the completion of the baseline report for the RCT cohort, the preparation and refinement of a pre-analysis plan as well as the continued preparation and refinement of evaluation protocols, in particular for the measurement of coffee yields. The Covid-19 pandemic also impacted the RCT and required some adjustment to planned processes and procedures. In particular, the envisaged RCT midline survey of trained farmers could not be conducted as a result of lockdown measures and out of health concerns for the survey teams and participating farmers. 15
You can also read