Special Education Directors' Forum Welcome - June 11, 2021 - Minnesota ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
1. Prioritize equity. 2. Start from within. 3. Measure what matters. Ten 4. Go local. Minnesota 5. Follow the money. Commitments 6. Start early. to Equity 7. Monitor implementation of standards. 8. Value people. 9. Improve conditions for learning. 10.Give students options.
Important Announcement This Forum will be in presentation format only. If you have a question about any of today’s content, please submit to Division of Special Education email box: mde.special-ed@state.mn.us 06/11/2021
Today’s Agenda 9:30 a.m.: Welcome – Robyn Widley, Director, Special Education Division, Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) 9:40 a.m.: Agency and Legislative Updates – Daron Korte, Assistant Commissioner, MDE 9:55 a.m.: Minnesota Administrators for Special Education (MASE) Updates – John Klaber, Executive Director, and Sarah Mittelstadt, President, MASE 10 a.m.: Updates from the U.S. Department of Education – Josiah Willey, Ed.D., Minnesota State Lead, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), U.S. Department of Education (ED) 4
Today’s Agenda (2) 10:40 a.m.: Break 10:45 a.m.: Assistance and Compliance Division Update – Sonia Smith, Director, Assistance and Compliance Division, MDE 10:55 a.m.: Early Learning Services Update – Danielle Hayden, Early Childhood Special Education Supervisor, Early Learning Services Division, MDE 11:05 a.m.: Minnesota Department of Health Guidance – Denise Herrmann, DNP RN CPNP, Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) 11:15 a.m.: Closing and adjourn – Robyn Widley, Director, Special Education Division 5
Directors’ Forum 2021-22 Updated Dates August 20, 2021 February 11, 2022 September 10, 2021 March 18, 2022 October 15, 2021 April 8, 2022 November 12, 2021 May 20, 2022 December 10, 2021 June 10, 2022 6
Updates from Robyn Widley – Division of Special Education • MDE staff is working to update the COVID-19 Special Education webpage to remove, revise and develop new documents as needed based on the rescinding of Governor’s Executive Orders 20-82 and 21-21 and the Minnesota Safe Learning Plan no longer in effect as of June 30, 2021. We will let you know through the special education directors’ listserv by end of June what actions are taken for the webpages. • Extended School Year Guidance for Summer 2021 – posted Frequently Asked Questions about the Guide to Addressing the Impact of the COVID- 19 Pandemic on Students with Disabilities; added new Questions 15 and 16 updating guidance on distance learning during Extended School Year (ESY) programs. 7
Updates from Robyn Widley – Division of Special Education (2) • American Rescue Plan (ARP) Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) funds: Information on allocations for ARP IDEA funds for Section 611, 619 and Part C was received on 6/4/21. 100% of 611 and 619 funds are to be sent to districts. A Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) document from OSEP will be sent to states later in June. We will share more information with you as we receive it. General comment from OSEP: these funds are similar to American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds in 2009. • Division of special education strategic planning alignment to MDE strategic plan and objectives - update and more to come in Fall 2021 8
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) Program Minnesota Automated Reporting Student System (MARSS) Reporting Reminders – End of Year (EOY) 2020 Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) under Mandatory CEIS and Voluntary CEIS providing services to students without disabilities/Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) are required to report these students in MARSS with “Special Education Evaluation Status (SEES) 8” and in Ed-Fi as “Coordinated Early Intervening Services” (as relevant for your LEA) by October 7, 2021. LEAs under Mandatory CEIS to provide services to students with disabilities/IEPs are required to report these students using the MDE CEIS IEP Student Data Tracker in the State Educational Record View and Submission (SERVS) system through the MDE SERVS Webpage and in Ed-Fi as “Coordinated Early Intervening Services” (as relevant for your LEA) by October 13, 2021. 9
MDE CEIS Technical Assistance – One More Webinar CEIS Webinar # 5 – Questions and Answers (open-ended): Wednesday, June 16, 2021 1:30-2:30 p.m. – Years 1, 2 and 3 LEAs Opened-ended webinar For registration information, please contact Doug Gray at 651-582-8281 If you have any questions, please contact the following program contacts: Alex Migambi, State Disproportionality Specialist, Special Education, 651-582-8736 Denise Berger, Special Education Funding Specialist, School Finance, 651-582-8260 Carolyn Cherry, Supervisor, Results and Improvement Unit, 651-582-8509 10
Alternative Delivery of Specialized Instructional Services (ADSIS) – Deadline Extended to June 18 ADSIS for Fiscal Years 2022-23 Grant Opportunity instructions, application and budget documentation is still available on MDE’s grant opportunity site. Purpose: providing direct instruction and services to K-12 students and preschool students who are part of district programs that generate general education revenue and who may need additional academic and behavioral supports to succeed in the general education environment and who may eventually qualify for special education if the prevention services were not available. See the grant instructions for specific, allowable outcomes. A record number of applicants applied and have been awarded with ADSIS funds for FY22-23. We have chosen to extend the ADSIS application deadline until June 18, 2021. 11
MDE Agency and Legislative Updates Daron Korte | Assistant Commissioner June 11, 2021
Minnesota Administrators for Special Education (MASE) Updates Sarah Mittelstadt | President John Klaber | Executive Director June 11, 2021
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION’S (ED) OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS (OSEP) AND THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION JOSIAH WILLEY, ED.D. MINNESOTA PART B STATE LEAD OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
About Me Josiah Willey, Ed.D. • Originally from Maine • My son, Eli • State Lead for 10 years • Minnesota Part B State Lead since 2014 • LEA Special Education Director Elementary • Special Education Teacher 15 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The Role of a State Lead • Federal liaison • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part C and/or Part B State assignments • State Leads provide guidance and technical support to state level teams on a regular basis 16 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
About OSEP • The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is one of many offices within the U.S. Department of Education (ED) • Our vision and mission • Administration of IDEA • OSEP’s divisions: Monitoring State Improvement Planning (MSIP) and Research to Practice (RTP) 17 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
ED Organizational Chart 18 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
OSERS Organizational Chart 19 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
OSEP Vision and Mission OSEP VISION: Driving excellent outcomes for infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities and their families through monitoring and supporting States. OSEP MISSION: Through monitoring, technical assistance, and dissemination of information to States, families and other stakeholders, MSIP ensures that the rights afforded under IDEA to eligible infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities, and their families, are assured through implementation of Statewide systems that incorporate effective strategies to improve functional and educational outcomes to prepare and provide children with options for further education, employment, and independent living. 20 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The MSIP Division Led by Dr. Gregg Corr, MSIP Division Director The Monitoring and State Improvement Planning (MSIP) division carries out major activities related to the Part B, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and 619 formula grant programs. The MSIP division is divided into four teams which are each led by an Associate Division Director (ADD). 21 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The four MSIP ADDs Team A: Dr. Al Jones Team B: Christine Pilgrim Team C: Angela Tanner-Dean Team D: Matthew Schneer 22 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
In performing their responsibilities, MSIP teams: • Conduct Annual Program Monitoring. • Provide technical assistance (TA). • Review state eligibility document submissions. • Provide information and TA to our customers and partners. • Manage the state grant award process. • Participate in the development and dissemination of policy, regulatory, and programmatic guidance. • Manage audit findings. • Provide information to customers. 23 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The RTP Division Led by Dr. Larry Wexler, RTP Division Director The Research to Practice Division (RTP) administers the discretionary grant programs designed to help infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities achieve improved educational results and functional outcomes. 24 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The core functions of RTP are: • Serving as a national leader in early intervention and special education programs, policies, and activities; • Collaborating with federal partners and key stakeholders in education and related fields; • Developing and administering grants and contracts; and • Providing information and data to the public, including policy leaders and other stakeholders 25 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The division is organized into five teams: • Office of the Director • Early Childhood and Parent Team • Elementary and Middle School Team • Secondary, Transition and Post-Secondary Team • National Initiatives Team 26 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The discretionary grant programs are authorized under: Part D of IDEA Personnel Development Grant Technical Assistance and Dissemination Grants State Personnel Development Grants Parent Training and Information Grants Educational Technology, Media, and Materials Grants Part B of IDEA Technical Assistance on State Data Collection Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 Promoting the Readiness of Minors in Supplemental Security Income (PROMISE) Grants Annual Report to Congress 27 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
OSEP, Office of the Director The Office of the Director (OD) in OSEP ensures: • The effective implementation of OSEP's legislative mission • Advises the Assistant Secretary on federal educational policy related to individuals with disabilities • And provides leadership in addressing problems of American education for infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities. 28 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Acting OSEP Director Dr. David Cantrell, Acting OSEP Director Dr. Cantrell, delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Has led OSEP’s work in support of President Biden’s Executive Order on Supporting the Reopening and Continuing Operation of Schools and Early Childhood Programs. 29 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report IDEA requires each state to develop a State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR) that evaluates the state’s efforts to implement the requirements and purposes of the IDEA by February of each year. Includes indicators that measure child and family outcomes and other indicators that measure compliance with the requirements of the IDEA. 30 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
OSEP uses this and other public information to annually determine if the state: Meets requirements Needs assistance Needs intervention Needs substantial intervention 31 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) On June 24, 2014, OSEP revised its accountability system to shift the balance from a system focused primarily on compliance to one that puts more emphasis on results. This became what we know as Results Driven Accountability, or RDA. 32 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
RDA's Three Components: • State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR), which includes the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) under Indicator 17. • Determinations • Differentiated monitoring and support 33 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The Core Principles of RDA Principle 1: Partnership with stakeholders Principle 2: Transparent and understandable to educators and families Principle 3: Drives improved results Principle 4: Protects children and families Principle 5: Differentiated incentives and supports to states Principle 6: Encourages states to target resources and reduces burden Principle 7: Responsive to needs 34 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) In response to OSEP’s RDA initiative, states and entities have been required to submit SSIPs annually, which fall under Indicator 17 of the SPP/APR. In the SSIP, states will: • Use data to identify and address gaps in student performance. • Align the SSIP with the state’s existing improvement initiatives and reform efforts. • Align with other improvement work to drive innovation in the delivery of services to students. 35 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
SSIP Phases • Phase I was due in 2015. • Phase II was required in 2016. • Phase III was required in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021. 36 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
2022 SSIP Submission In 2022, states must include the specific content required by Indicator 17 which includes: a. Data Analysis; b. Phase III Implementation, Analysis and Evaluation; c. Stakeholder Engagement; and d. Additional Implementation Activities. 37 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
IDEA Formula Grant Programs MSIP administers three formula grant programs authorized by the IDEA: • Part C: infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families; • Part B, Section 619: preschool children ages three through five, and • Part B, Section 611: special education for children and youth with disabilities. 38 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Parts B and C Formula Grants Part B Formula Grants IDEA Part B Formula Grants assist states in providing a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment for children with disabilities, ages three through 21. Part C Formula Grants IDEA Part C Formula Grants support early intervention services for infants and toddlers. 39 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Significant Disproportionality IDEA requires states to collect and examine data to determine if significant disproportionality based on race and ethnicity is occurring in the state and LEA level with respect to: A. The identification of children as children with disabilities, including the identification of children as children with disabilities in accordance with a particular impairment; B. The placement in particular educational settings of such children; and C. The incidence, duration and type of disciplinary actions, including suspensions and expulsions. 40 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Significant Disproportionality (2) • IDEA does not define “significant disproportionality.” • The regulations require states to use a standard methodology for analysis of disproportionality, including setting a threshold above which disproportionality in the identification, placement, or discipline of children with disabilities within an LEA is significant. 41 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Differentiated Monitoring and Support (DMS 2.0) OSEP provides differentiated monitoring and support as part of its results driven accountability system. 42 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Differentiated Monitoring and Support (2) OSEP annually provides differentiated monitoring and support to states on: • Ensuring improved outcomes for infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities. • Complying with the IDEA programmatic requirements. • Complying with federal fiscal requirements. • Collecting and reporting valid and reliable data. • Ensuring implementation of the state’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP). 43 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Fiscal Congress appropriates IDEA funds intended to support early intervention and special education services for infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities and their families. OSEP currently monitors formula grant to ensure consistency with federal requirements. 44 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Fiscal (2) OSEP’s fiscal monitoring includes: • On-site visits and telephone interviews • Reviews of publicly available information • State-submitted documentation • Uniform Guidance from the Office of Management and Budget and audits from the Office of Inspector General 45 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The Biden Administration The Biden Administration officially began on January 20. The top priorities during its first 100 days have been focused on the importance of ensuring students can return to schools safely. 46 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The Biden Administration (2) In the first 100 days, the administration has made significant strides in reopening schools for in-person learning. The Administration has: • Reopened majority of K-8 schools for in-person learning • Provided unprecedented resources and support to PreK-12 schools to help in their reopening efforts. • Provided support and relief to students, borrowers, and postsecondary institutions impacted by the pandemic. • Proposed historic new investments in America's educational system to lead the country through an economic recovery and build the education system back better than it was before. 47 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
U.S. Secretary of Education U.S. Secretary of Education, Miguel Cardona Miguel A. Cardona was sworn in as the 12th Secretary of Education on March 2, 2021. 48 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
U.S. Secretary of Education (2) • Secretary Cardona has two decades of experience as a public school educator from the City of Meriden, Connecticut. • In 2012, he won the 2012 National Distinguished Principal Award for the State of Connecticut and the Outstanding Administrator Award from University of Connecticut's Neag School of Education. • Secretary Cardona then lead the work of Performance and Evaluation in the district and subsequently assumed the role of Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning, overseeing teaching, learning and leadership alignment. • Prior to becoming the 12th Secretary of Education, Secretary Cardona served as the Commissioner of Education in Connecticut since August 2019. 49 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Implementing the Biden Administration’s Priorities at ED ED has done much to support the Biden Administration’s priority to reopening and rebuilding public education across the nation by supporting more schools in their efforts; addressing the longstanding equity, opportunity, and achievement gaps that were exacerbated by the pandemic; and ensuring that students, families, and educators make a robust recovery. 50 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The Biden Administration’s Priorities In these efforts, ED has: • Launched the Summer Learning and Enrichment Collaborative • Renewed our partnership with the Puerto Rico Department of Education, providing immediate access to $900+ million in federal education. • Conducting a comprehensive review of regulations implementing Title IX Guidance to provide guidance on guaranteeing educational environments free from discrimination on the basis of sex, including sexual orientation or gender identity. 51 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The Biden Administration’s Priorities (2) • Administered $1.3 billion in Disability Loan forgiveness in higher education, ensuring that 230,000 borrowers with total and permanent disabilities can focus on their well-being. • Paused student loan payments, helping an additional 1 million borrowers burdened by debt during the COVID-19 emergency. • Discharging $1.6 billion of debt for Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU). • Provided nonstop assistance and guidance to educators, students, and stakeholders interested in our reopening efforts. 52 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The Biden Administration’s Priorities (3) Additionally, Secretary Cardona has shared additional priorities to guide our work in the coming days and months. These include: • Promoting equity in student access to educational resources, opportunities, and welcoming environments; • Supporting a diverse education workforce, and educators’ professional growth, to strengthen student learning; • Meeting students’ social, emotional, and academic needs; • Improving student postsecondary education pathways, college affordability and completion; and • Strengthening cross-agency coordination and community engagement to advance systemic change. 53 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Implementing the Biden Administration’s Priorities at OSEP OSEP continues to work closely with the new administration particularly in the areas of equity and the health and safety for all students. Specifically, the OSEP team is: • Promoting equity in student access to educational resources, opportunities, and welcoming environments; • Supporting a diverse education workforce, and educators’ professional growth, to strengthen student learning; 54 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
The Biden Administration’s Priorities at OSEP • Meeting students’ social, emotional, and academic needs; • Improving student postsecondary education pathways, college affordability and completion; and • Strengthening cross-agency coordination and community engagement to advance systemic change. • Differentiated Monitoring and Support (DMS) 2.0 “PIVOT”. The intent of these calls is to ensure that states have the support they need and help OSEP understand the issues that are occurring as a result of COVID-19. 55 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
American Rescue Plan (ARP) On Thursday, March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act was signed into law. • Unprecedented $1.9 trillion package of assistance measures, including $122 billion for the ARP Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund. • Funds are provided to State educational agencies and school districts to help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools and address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation’s students. • ARP ESSER funds may be used for all purposes allowed under IDEA 56 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Section 2014 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 Section 2014(a) of the American Rescue Plan Act provided more than $3 billion in supplemental funding for the three IDEA formula grants: • $2,580,000,000 for IDEA Part B Grants to States (Section 611) • $200,000,000 for IDEA Part B Preschool Grants (Section 619) • $250,000,000 for IDEA Part C Grants for Infants and Families 57 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Closing Thank you for your commitment to support infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities and their families in Minnesota. Your OSEP Part B State Lead contact information: Josiah L. R. Willey, Ed.D. Education Program Specialist Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education Josiah.Willey@ed.gov 202-245-6247 58 OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Home: www.ed.gov/osers/osep Blog: https://sites.ed.gov/osers Twitter: https://twitter.com/ED_Sped_Rehab YouTube: www.youtube.com/c/OSERS OSEP OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
Break Special Education Directors’ Forum June 11, 2021
Assistance and Compliance Division Updates Sonia R. Smith | Division Director June 11, 2021
Upcoming Training Student Maltreatment Program Olmstead Training: Reimagining Mandated Reporting Friday, June 18, 2021 8:30 a.m.- 12 noon, WebEx Miriam Itzkowitz, MSW and Katie Olson, J.D. Institute to Transform Child Protection at Mitchell-Hamline School of Law Board of School Administrators Continuing Education Units available Register now on Webex (https://minnesota.webex.com/minnesota/k2/j.php?MTID=t03816ae65af08f2e9061d95ada7fa475) 62
New and Different Stepwell MN Updates More Information Coming Soon Extended School Year (ESY) Guidance for Summer 2021 Frequently Asked Questions about the Guide to Addressing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Students with Disabilities; added new Questions 15 and 16 updating guidance on distance learning during Extended School Year (ESY) programs. 63
Extended School Year (ESY) Guidance for Summer 2021 [ADDED 6/2/21] Question 15: May school districts continue to provide a distance learning model option to students with disabilities eligible for ESY services during the summer of 2021? Answer: Yes, until June 30, 2021. On July 30, 2020, to further mitigate the community spread of COVID-19 during the global pandemic, Minnesota schools were directed to prepare to implement an appropriate educational instructional model at the start of the 2020-21 school year (specifically, an in-person model, a distance learning model, or a hybrid model). MDE and the Minnesota Department of Health developed the Safe Learning Plan guidance document explaining how Minnesota schools were to determine the appropriate educational instructional model in districts across the State. Further, Minnesota schools were tasked with providing an equitable distance learning option for all families, regardless of the appropriate educational instructional model the district was using. On May 6, 2021, Executive Order 21-21 ordered that, notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, the provisions of Executive Order 20-82 do not apply beyond the 2020-21 school year, and that effective on Thursday, July 1, 2021, Executive Order 20-82 is rescinded. Services provided before July 1, 2021 during the summer of 2021 are considered services provided during the 2020-21 school year. Specifically, ESY services are an annual IEP team determination, and thus included in student IEPs as part of the 2020-21 school year, and school districts may continue to provide ESY programming for students in a distance learning model or a hybrid model in accordance with Minnesota’s Safe Learning Plan during the summer of 2021. ESY services must be provided in accordance with a student’s IEP as necessary to provide FAPE. As such, the student’s IEP must continue to describe the learning model for the summer of 2021, as appropriate, and as it impacts the provision of a FAPE. Authority: 34 C.F.R. § 300.106 and Minn. R. 3525.0755; Minn. Exec. Order No. 20-82 (July 30, 2020); Minnesota’s Safe Learning Plan for the 2020-21 School Year, (July 30, 2020); and Minn. Exec. Order No. 21-21 (May 6, 2021). 64
Extended School Year (ESY) Guidance for Summer 2021 Continued [ADDED 6/2/21] Question 16: May school districts continue to provide a distance learning model option to students with disabilities eligible for ESY services after July 1, 2021? Executive Order 20-82 provided school districts and charter schools with the ability to offer instruction and services through distance learning. Executive Order 20-82 will be rescinded at 11:59 p.m. on June 30, 2021 by Executive Order 21-21. Therefore, effective July 1, 2021 school districts and charter schools no longer have authority to provide ESY services through distance learning unless they are a state approved online provider under Minnesota Statutes Section 124D.095. The Minnesota Legislature is currently debating a provision that would allow all school districts and charter schools to offer a distance learning option to all students during the summer of 2021 and the 2021-22 school year. We will update this guidance document with any legislative changes as we learn of them. Authority: 34 C.F.R. § 300.106 and Minn. R. 3525.0755; Minn. Exec. Order No. 20-82 (July 30, 2020); Minnesota’s Safe Learning Plan for the 2020-21 School Year, (July 30, 2020); and Minn. Exec. Order No. 21-21 (May 6, 2021). Questions: For questions related to this FAQ document or the Guide to Addressing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Students with Disabilities, please contact MDE’s Division of Assistance and Compliance, Dispute Resolution Team or call 651- 582-8689. 65
Physical Holding and Seclusion Reporting There are no changes to seclusion reporting for July 15, 2021. Please continue to report seclusions as outlined below: Send an email confirming no seclusion uses to MDE.RP-SeclusionReporting@state.mn.us. Complete the Quarterly Seclusion Reporting Form on the Seclusion webpage, and upload. Physical holding reporting will hopefully be collected via the new Stepwell MN reporting tool. District trainings on Stepwell MN will be provided on Thursday, June 24 in two sessions: 9-10 a.m. and 1-2 p.m., and will be recorded and available online. The due date for physical holding is July 15, 2021, but MDE will continue to accept submissions of physical holding data through August 2021. For Stepwell MN, you will need names and Minnesota Automated Reporting Student System (MARSS) numbers for students who have been physically held during the 2020-21 school year, as well as information about what has worked in your district to complete narrative responses. We appreciate your patience as we get this new system up and running. Questions can be sent to MDE.RP-SeclusionReporting@state.mn.us. 66
Special Education Complaints Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-20 FY20 FY19 FY18 116 complaints received by 122 complaints received by MDE 116 complaints received by MDE Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) 87 decisions issued through August 98 decisions issued through August 87 decisions issued through August 29, 2020 29, 2019 29, 2018 63 decisions (72 percent) with 78 decisions (80 percent) with 55 decisions (63 percent) with findings of noncompliance findings of noncompliance findings of noncompliance 6 systemic complaints 8 systemic complaints 8 systemic complaints 0 decisions appealed 0 decisions appealed 0 decisions appealed 67
Most Common Violations Top Areas of Noncompliance Reference Failure to provide services in conformity with a student’s individualized education 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.17, 300.101 program (IEP). Failure to timely review and revise a student’s IEP. 34 C.F.R. § 300.324(b) 34 C.F.R. § 300.503; Minn. Stat. § Failure to provide proper prior written notice. 125A.091; Minn. R. 3525.3600 Failure to follow statutory standards regarding restrictive procedures. Minn. Stat. § 125A.0942 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.17, 300.320(a)(3); Failure to provide appropriate progress reports. Minn. R. 3525.2810 Failure to inform staff of IEP responsibilities. 34 C.F.R. § 300.323(d) 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.300-300.306; Failure to follow evaluation procedures. Minn. R. 3525.2550, 3525.2710 68
Top Areas of Non-Compliance in Special Education Complaints FY20 Services in conformity with a student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP). Timely review and revision of a student’s IEP. Prior written notice. Restrictive procedures. Progress reports. 69
Helpful Tips • Be as proactive as possible before and during the complaint process • Proactively work on resolutions to complaints • Review the FY20 annual report for more information related to complaints • Visit our webpage (report found at the bottom of the page) • Plan to attend summer trainings and webinars • Topics may include • Ways to avoid violations • Getting familiar with new systems 70
Thank you Sonia R. Smith mde.compliance-assistance@state.mn.us 651-582-8689
Early Learning Services Updates Danielle Hayden| Early Childhood Special Education (ESCE) Supervisor June 11, 2021 72
End of EO 20-94: Eligibility What will happen after Executive Order 20-94 has been rescinded on or before June 30, 2021? Upon the end of the Executive Order 20-94, students that are age 7 and older and still reported as disability code developmental delay (12) must be evaluated in order to determine eligibility for categorical disability or determined no longer eligible for services. Minnesota Rules, part 3525.1351 states that a child age 3 through age 6 may meet eligibility for special education services by meeting criteria for a categorical disability or by meeting criteria for developmental delay. 73
End of EO 20-94: Reporting Students who are age 7 or 8 at the end of the school year and who have a primary disability of 12 should have Status End code of 40 (assuming they are enrolled on the last day of the school year), Special Education Evaluation Status (SEES) is 4 or 6. If the student is re-evaluated over the summer and qualifies for another disability, then the student will start the 2021-22 school year with SEES of 4 and the new disability. If the student is re-evaluated over the summer but does not qualify, then the student will start the school year with SEES of 1 and no disability. 74
End of EO 20-94: Reporting Continued If the student’s re-evaluation does not occur until after the school year starts, the student will start the school year with a SEES of 1 or 2 (depending on when the evaluation begins). • If the student qualifies, a new enrollment record is created on the day that services are started under the new IEP. • If the student does not qualify, the student’s SEES remains a 2. The MARSS edits will revert to the pre-Executive Order status at the beginning of the 2021-22 school year. Error 106 “Primary disability not appropriate for age” is generated when the student’s age is age 7 or older, the primary disability is 12, developmental delay and the enrollment record crosses December 1. The student is ineligible to be included in the December 1 child count. 75
End of EO 20-94: Fiscal Considerations As of June 30, 2021, with the rescinding of EO 20-94, students that have been receiving special education services under developmental delay will no longer be eligible to receive those services and therefore, special education service hours, membership and attendance would not be reported. Special education federal and state funds could be used to continue the evaluation and eligibility determinations for students aging out of developmental delay. 76
Recovery and Support Considerations Special education students and those that no longer qualify for services, are entitled to the same supports and recovery options as general education students. There are opportunities to consider the use of resources in supporting students through this time. 77
Home Visiting Part C Service Delivery: Pre-COVID Complaint Decision 20-049C Location of Services: Natural Environment defined as where the child and parents are located. Method of Service Delivery: “Virtual Services” as one way of providing services in the child’s home, when clearly described in the Individual Family Service Plan (IFSP) and agreed upon by the parent, is a description of the “method” of delivery, and is still considered a provision of early intervention services in the child’s natural environment. 78
What Are the Considerations in Returning to In-Person Home Visiting? Monitor for Symptoms of Illness: if provider or anyone in household have symptoms of any illness, in-person visit will be postponed (could instead have a virtual visit) Communication and Reporting Protocols: how will you continue to track and monitor transmission Environmental Controls/Supports: Outdoor spaces, open windows, limit numbers present, etc. Universal Health and Hygiene Protocols: handwashing, disinfecting, masking Consider Decision Making Rubrics for in-person or virtual service delivery 79
Important Dates Fall ECSE Leaders Conference: Virtual Wednesday, October 6, 2021, 12 noon to 4 p.m. Wednesday, October 13, 2021, 12:30 to 4 p.m. Wednesday, November 3, 2021, 12:30 to 4 p.m. Fall New ECSE Leaders Training: Virtual Tuesday, August 17, 2021: Morning Wednesday September 29, 2021: Afternoon 80
Special Education Update Denise Herrmann, DNP RN CPNP | COVID-19 Education and Childcare Team 6/11/2021 This information is as accurate as the time it was presented. The situation is fluid and unprecedented and I will continue to do our best to give the most up-to-date guidance. 81
Basic Tenets 82
The Swiss Cheese Model of Pandemic Defense (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/health/coronavirus-swiss- cheese-infection-mackay.html) 83
Schools and Child Care COVID-19: Planning, Guidance and Data Webpage Schools and Child Care COVID-19 Planning, Guidance, and Data: (https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases /coronavirus/schools/plan.html) • Two sections: • 2020-21 School Year Guidance • 2021 Summer School Guidance 84
COVID-19 Prevention Guidance for Summer School COVID-19 Prevention Guidance for Summer School: (https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/schools/sum mer.pdf) • Federal government, Minnesota Rule, and universal business guidance requirements: • Face coverings: All people are required by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) order to wear face coverings on all public transportation conveyances (airports, public buses, etc.), including school buses. • Handling a suspected or confirmed case of COVID-19: Minnesota Rule 4605.7070 requires any person in charge of any institution, school, child care facility, or camp to report cases of COVID-19 to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). • Executive Order 21-11, as amended by Executive Order 21-21 and 21-23 (“EO”), requires all businesses and entities to follow the COVID-19 Universal Guidance for All Businesses and Entities through June 30, 2021, or until 70% of Minnesotans aged 16+ receive at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, whichever is earlier. 85
Recommendations for Mitigating COVID-19 Transmission in K-12 Schools • Recommend schools follow CDC’s guidance on • Follow the Recommended COVID-19 Decision physical distancing and cohorting: Operational Tree for People in Schools, Youth, and Child Strategy for K-12 Schools through Phased Care Programs to determine who should stay Prevention: home and when staff or students may return (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019- ncov/community/schools-childcare/operation- strategy.html#anchor_1616080084165). • Educate staff, students, and families about the signs and symptoms of COVID-19, when their • Aligning with CDC, it is strongly recommended children should stay home, and when they can that all people present in school buildings and return to school. district offices wear a face covering • Develop policies to prevent the spread of • All members of the school community should disease. continue to be vigilant in monitoring for symptoms of illness and protect others by • Post signage at main entrance(s) requesting staying home when they are feeling ill and that people who have been symptomatic not following COVID-19 specific exclusion and self- quarantine guidance when appropriate. enter the building. 86
Recommendations for Mitigating COVID-19 Transmission in K-12 Schools (continued) • Develop policies for managing case follow-up and notifying exposed people, consistent with Recommendations for Handling a Confirmed Case of COVID- 19. • Personal protective equipment is strongly recommended for staff providing direct student support services to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission in situations that involve close, physical, or prolonged contact. • Ventilation is an important factor in preventing COVID-19 transmission indoors. Facility owners and operators are strongly recommended to evaluate the operational capacity of ventilation systems and increase and maintain ventilation provided throughout the building. 87
88
Recommendations for Handling a Confirmed Case of COVID-19 Recommendations for Handling a Confirmed Case of COVID-19: (https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/schools/ casehandle.pdf) • Minnesota Rule 4605.7070 requires any person in charge of any institution, school, child care facility, or camp to report cases of COVID-19 to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). • Reportable Disease Rule (Communicable Disease Reporting Rule): Reporting an Infectious Disease: (https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/reportable/rule/index. html) • Recommendations for identifying close contacts in classrooms, cafeterias, transportation, etc. • Recommendations for COVID-19 exposure notification and quarantine of close contacts. 89
Recommendations for Infection Prevention and Control Practices for Delivering Direct Student Support Services Recommendations for Infection Prevention and Control Practices for Delivering Direct Student Support Services: (https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/schools/directsupport.pdf) 90
Recommendations for Providing Support to Students in Their Homes Recommendations for Providing Support to Students in Their Homes: (https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/ coronavirus/schools/homevisit.pdf) • Before and during visit recommendations for staff, students and families. • Caring for People with Disabilities: (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019- ncov/need-extra-precautions/direct-service- providers.html) 91
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR): Hospitalization of Adolescents Aged 12-17 Years with Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 — COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1, 2020-April 24, 2021 Jan. – Mar. 2021: • Dr. Yvonne Maldonado, chair of the committee on infectious diseases at the American Academy • 204 adolescent hospitalization assessed. of Pediatrics, said: • “There’s a very strong case to be made for • Nearly 1/3 required intensive care unit preventing a disease that causes hospitalizations admission, and 5% required invasive mechanical and deaths, not to mention contributing to ventilation but no associated deaths occurred. community transmission.” • Hospitalization rate was three times as high as • Among children “at least 322 have died, making it one of the leading causes of death among children.” hospitalizations linked to influenza over three recent flu seasons. • “It sounds like it’s not a lot of deaths,” but, she added, “it should still be horrifying that 300 to 600 • Hospitalization of Adolescents Aged 12–17 Years kids are dying because of something that is preventable.” with Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 — COVID- NET, 14 States, March 1, 2020–April 24, 2021: (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/ • Teens Are Rarely Hospitalized With Covid, but mm7023e1.htm?s_cid=mm7023e1_w) Cases Can Be Severe: (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/04/health/ coronavirus-teenagers-hospitalizations.html) 92
MMWR: Modeling of Future COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, by Vaccination Rates and Nonpharmaceutical Intervention Scenarios Modeling of Future COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, by Vaccination Rates and Nonpharmaceutical Intervention Scenarios — United States, April–September 2021: (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/ wr/mm7019e3.htm?s_cid=mm7019e3_w) 93
MDH Inboxes • Public (parents, staff, non-nurse) • Positive Case in Child Care, School, Day Inquiry Inbox: Camp: Health.covid19@state.mn.us Health.schoolcc.followup@state.mn.us • Question/Positive Case in Institutes • Questions on IEPs/504 plans, of Higher Education attendance requirements and drops, (IHEs)/Colleges/Universities: distance learning go to the MDE Health.HigherEd.Covid19@state.mn. COVID-19 Inbox: COVID- us 19.Questions.MDE@state.mn.us • Question/Positive Case in Youth • Question from School Nurse, and Adult Sports: Administration or Child Care Provider: Health.sports.covid19@state.mn.us Health.schools.covid19@state.mn.us 94
Thank You MDH Schools Inbox: Health.schools.covid19@state.mn.us (Exclusion guidance, health concerns, potential exposures, interpreting CDC/MDH guidance)
05/07/2020 In closing – our thoughts continue to be with you all Stay healthy – stay well We all do better when we all do better… together. -Adapted from Senator Paul Wellstone 96
05/07/2021 Thank you …for all you do for Minnesota students and families. Questions? https://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/6366504/June-2021-Directors-Forum 97
You can also read