Specific Celiac Disease Antibodies in Children on a Gluten-Free Diet

 
CONTINUE READING
ARTICLES

Specific Celiac Disease Antibodies in Children on a
Gluten-Free Diet
AUTHORS: Caroline E. Hogen Esch, MD,a Victorien M.                        WHAT’S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Circulating celiac disease (CD)
Wolters, MD, PhD,b Susan A. M. Gerritsen, MD,b Hein                       antibodies at the time of diagnosis and their disappearance after a
Putter, PhD,c B. Mary von Blomberg, PhD,d Ingrid M. W. van                gluten-free diet support the diagnosis of CD. Endomysial antibodies
Hoogstraten, PhD,d Roderick H. J. Houwen, MD, PhD,b Nico                  (EMAs) and tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-TG2s) are
van der Lely, MD, PhD,e and M. Luisa Mearin, MD, PhDa
                                                                          useful to evaluate the compliance with the gluten-free diet.
Departments of aPediatric Gastroenterology and cMedical
Statistics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands;
bDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University Medical
                                                                          WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: In children with CD, ⬃80% will be sero-
Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; dDepartment of Pathology,           negative for EMAs and anti-TG2s after 2 years of gluten-free diet,
VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; and                 and the mean concentration of anti-TG2s will show a 74%
eDepartment of Pediatrics, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft,              decrease after 3 months of diet.
Netherlands
KEY WORDS
celiac disease, gluten enteropathy, gluten-free diet, celiac
antibodies, serology
ABBREVIATIONS
CD—celiac disease
                                                                     abstract
HLA—human leukocyte antigen                                          OBJECTIVE: Celiac disease (CD) is characterized by histologic altera-
Ig—immunoglobulin                                                    tions in small bowel biopsies. Circulating specific CD antibodies at the
EMA—endomysial antibody
anti-TG2—anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody                       time of diagnosis and their disappearance after a gluten-free diet sup-
CI—confidence interval                                                port the diagnosis of CD. We aimed to determine the behavior of the CD
DGP—deamidated gliadin peptide                                       antibodies immunoglobulin A anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-TG2)
Drs Hogen Esch and Dr Wolters contributed equally to this work.      and immunoglobulin A endomysium (EMA) in children with CD after
www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2010-3762                    starting a gluten-free diet.
doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3762                                           METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study in the Nether-
Accepted for publication May 6, 2011                                 lands between 2001 and 2009. Inclusion criteria were all newly diag-
Address correspondence to C. E. Hogen Esch, MD, Leiden               nosed patients with CD younger than 19 years who had at least 1
University Medical Centre, Department of Pediatrics, J6-S-208,       anti-TG2 and/or EMA measurement before and after starting a gluten-
PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands. E-mail:
c.e.hogen_esch@lumc.nl                                               free diet. Eight different anti-TG2 kits were used with substrates of
PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275).
                                                                     guinea pig TG2 in 1 (Sigma) and 7 human-recombinant TG2: Varelisa
                                                                     and EliA Celikey Phadia-GmbH; Orgentec Diagnostica-GmbH; Diarect AG;
Copyright © 2011 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
                                                                     Roboscreen GmbH; Aeskulisa Diagnostics; Binding Site Ltd. EMA was
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have
no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.      analyzed with indirect immunofluorescence tests. Statistical analyses
                                                                     were performed by using mixed-model repeated measurements and
                                                                     survival analysis.
                                                                     RESULTS: There were 129 children with CD included (mean age: 5.6
                                                                     years; SD ⫾ 4.2). The mean concentration of anti-TG2 decreased signif-
                                                                     icantly within 3 months after starting a gluten-free diet (P ⬍ .0001). The
                                                                     cumulative percentage of children who became negative for EMA after
                                                                     1⁄2, 1, 11⁄2, and 2 years was 31%, 60%, 74%, and 87%, respectively. For

                                                                     anti-TG2, a comparable trend was shown: 35%, 55%, 64%, and 78%,
                                                                     respectively.
                                                                     CONCLUSIONS: Doctors taking care of children with CD should be
                                                                     aware that the mean concentration of anti-TG2 will show a 74% de-
                                                                     crease (95% confidence interval: 69%–79%) after 3 months of gluten-
                                                                     free diet, and ⬃80% of the children will be sero-negative for EMA and
                                                                     anti-TG2 after 2 years of the diet. Pediatrics 2011;128:547–552

PEDIATRICS Volume 128, Number 3, September 2011                                                                                            547
                                 Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on February 3, 2015
Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune         been evaluated at different time points      follow-up. The ethical committee of
disorder caused by an inflammatory            during an 1-year follow-up.12 In chil-       Leiden University Medical Centre ap-
T-cell response to gluten proteins that      dren, only the follow-up of anti-TG2 (IgA    proved the study protocol.
causes damage of the small bowel mu-         and IgG) has been reported during a
cosa.1–3 The treatment of CD is a life-      2-year period.14 The aim of our study        Serology
long gluten-free diet, which is demand-      was to determine the behavior of the         For IgA anti-TG2 determinations, 8 dif-
ing for patients.4 The disorder has a        specific CD antibodies, anti-TG2 and          ferent kits were used with the follow-
variable clinical presentation: from a       EMA, upon the start of a gluten-free         ing substrates (between parenthesis
clear malabsorption syndrome with di-        diet in a large cohort of children           the equivocal area of the kit recom-
arrhea and failure-to-thrive in chil-        with CD.                                     mended by the manufacturer): (1)
dren, to less specific symptoms, for ex-                                                   guinea pig TG2: Sigma, in-house assay
ample, anemia, mouth ulcers, or              METHODS                                      (4 –7 U/mL), and (2) human recombi-
osteoporosis.2 CD has a strong genetic       Patients                                     nant TG2: Varelisa Celikey (5– 8 U/mL)
component, and most of the patients                                                       and EliA Celikey (7–10 U/mL), both
carry the major histocompatibility           All children (18 or younger) who were
                                                                                          from Phadia GmbH; Orgentec Diagnos-
class II human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-      consecutively diagnosed for CD be-
                                                                                          tica (5–10 U/mL) GmbH; Diarect AG, in-
DQ2 and/or HLA-DQ8.5                         tween 2001 and 2009 and had a
                                                                                          house assay (3– 6 U/mL); Roboscreen
                                             follow-up at the departments of pediat-
CD is characterized by histologic alter-                                                  GmbH, in-house assay (3– 6 U/mL);
                                             rics of the Wilhelmina Children Hospi-
ations in the small bowel. Circulating                                                    Aeskulisa Diagnostics (10 –15 U/mL);
                                             tal/UMC (Utrecht), Leiden University
CD antibodies at the time of diagnosis                                                    and Binding Site group Ltd (4 –10
                                             Medical Centre (Leiden), and the
and their disappearance after a                                                           U/mL). IgA EMA determinations were
                                             Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis (Delft), in the
gluten-free diet support the diagnosis                                                    performed by standard indirect im-
                                             Netherlands. The diagnosis of CD was
of CD.6 The immunoglobulin A (IgA)                                                        mune fluorescence tests.17
                                             established by the histologic results of
class CD antibodies against endomy-          multiple small bowel biopsies taken by       The CD cases were scored as being
sium (EMA) and tissue transglutami-          upper endoscopy when the children            sero-negative at diagnosis when (1)
nase (anti-TG2), have a very high sensi-     consumed gluten, which revealed al-          anti-TG2 and EMA were both negative,
tivity and specificity for the disease6       terations characteristics for CD. The        or (2) anti-TG2 was negative and EMA
and are an essential part of the diag-       histologic abnormalities were classi-        was weak-positive. The patient’s sero-
nostic procedure for CD.7 It has been        fied according to Marsh.16 The children       logic follow-up was periodically sched-
shown that EMA and anti-TG2 are also         were considered to have CD when they         uled by their physician by using IgA
useful to evaluate the compliance            had alterations Marsh 2 –3C. Impor-          anti-TG2 and/or IgA EMA determina-
with the gluten-free diet, in both           tantly, children with Marsh 2 altera-        tions. The serologic data were evalu-
adults8–12 and children.8,13–15 However,     tions were only considered to have CD        ated retrospectively.
both antibodies were found not sensi-        when they had positive levels of spe-
tive enough to detect slight dietary         cific CD antibodies, anti-TG2, and/or         Statistical Analysis
mistakes and/or moderate mucosa              EMA at diagnosis. After consultation         Continuous data are expressed as
lesions.9,11,13                              with a dietician, all the children           mean ⫾ SD; dichotomous data as num-
For doctors who take care of children        started a gluten-free diet within 2          bers and percentages. Cumulative
with CD, as well as for the children and     weeks after the diagnostic biopsies.         event rates (normalization of anti-TG2
their parents, it is important to know       The characteristics of the patients          and EMA) were assessed by Kaplan-
what time interval is expected to            with CD were recorded at the moment          Meier survival curves. The course of
achieve a significant decrease and            of diagnosis, including the small bowel      mean concentration of anti-TG2 with a
normalization of the specific CD anti-        biopsy histology report. The inclu-          95% confidence interval (CI) over
bodies after starting a gluten-free diet.    sion criteria were (1) all patients          time was performed by repeated-
However, in children there is scarce         newly diagnosed for CD, and (2) hav-         measurement analysis (linear mixed
information over the long-term sero-         ing at least 1 anti-TG2 and/or EMA           model). The anti-TG2 results were
logic follow-up of specific CD antibod-       measurement before and after start-          grouped in 9 categories according to
ies measured at different time points        ing a gluten-free diet. Each partici-        the time point of the measurement in
during a gluten-free diet. In adults, the    pating center followed its own rou-          relationship to the diagnostic biopsies.
course of both anti-TG2 and EMA has          tine for the clinical and serologic          To compare the quantitative values of

548    HOGEN ESCH et al
                              Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on February 3, 2015
ARTICLES

FIGURE 1
Proportion of children with CD who were positive for anti-TG2 (n ⫽ 99) (A) and EMA (n⫽74) (B) after starting a gluten-free diet, presented in Kaplan-Meier
survival curves.

the different anti-TG2 tests, we calcu-              the inclusion criteria. The reasons for              formed). Both children responded clin-
lated the ratio of each anti-TG2 mea-                exclusion of the 19 children with CD                 ically and serologically well to the
surement by dividing each anti-TG2 re-               were that they did not have 1 anti-TG2               gluten-free diet.
sult (U/mL) by the cutoff value (U/mL)               and/or EMA measurement before and                    The mean time of follow-up of the chil-
for negativity as recommended by the                 after starting a gluten-free diet (n ⫽               dren from the moment of the diagnos-
manufacturers. For each anti-TG2 kit                 18), or that 1 child was sero-negative               tic biopsies was 28 months (SD ⫾ 25
we have used the following cutoff val-               at diagnosis and had small bowel biop-               months [range: 2–93 months]). In to-
ues for negativity: (a) guinea pig TG2:              sies with Marsh 2 alterations. The                   tal, 488 IgA anti-TG2 and 408 IgA EMA
Sigma, in-house assay (ⱕ4 U/mL) and                  mean age of the included CD cases at                 determinations were performed at dif-
(b) human recombinant TG2: Varelisa                  diagnosis was 5.6 years (SD ⫾ 4.2                    ferent time points. The mean time in-
Celikey (ⱕ5 U/mL) and EliA Celikey (ⱕ7               years [range: 11 months to 16 years]),               terval between the first serologic sam-
U/mL), both from Phadia GmbH; Orgen-                 83 were girls (1:2 ratio boys to girls).             ple and the biopsy was 1.3 months
tec Diagnostica (ⱕ5 U/mL) GmbH; Diar-                HLA-DQ genotyping was performed in                   (range: 9 months before and 2 weeks
ect AG (ⱕ3 U/mL); Roboscreen (ⱕ4                     48 children (37%), and all of them were              after biopsy). Seven children with CD
U/mL) GmbH; Aeskulisa Diagnostics
                                                     HLA-DQ2 and/or DQ8 positive. None of                 (5.4%) were sero-negative at diagno-
(ⱕ10 U/mL); and Binding Site group
                                                     the children had IgA deficiency. The                  sis, despite their Marsh 3 alterations:
Ltd (ⱕ4 U/mL). The ratio of 1 is the
                                                     histology results of the diagnostic                  Marsh 3A in 4 children, Marsh 3B in 2,
cutoff point for negativity. Anti-TG2 ra-
                                                     small bowel biopsies were Marsh 2 in                 and Marsh 3C in 1.
tios were log-transformed before
                                                     2% (n ⫽ 2), Marsh 3A in 33% (n ⫽ 42),                In Fig 1, the proportions of sero-
mixed-model analysis. By using the log
                                                     Marsh 3B in 39% (n ⫽ 50), and Marsh                  positive children for anti-TG2 and EMA
ratio, the results of the different tests
were equalized. In the mixed model,                  3C in 27% (n ⫽ 35). One of the 2 chil-               are shown by Kaplan-Meier survival
time (categorical) and age at diagno-                dren with Marsh 2 duodenal lesions                   curves. Ninety-nine (77%) and 74 (57%)
sis were entered as fixed effects and                 was treated with prednisone for an au-               children with CD could be followed for
individual as random effect. A P value               toimmune hepatitis at the time of the                the determination of the normalization
of ⬍.05 was considered significant.                   small bowel biopsies. This child was                 of anti-TG2 and EMA, respectively. In Ta-
The statistical program SPSS 16.0                    HLA-DR3-DQ2 positive and both anti-                  ble 1 the cumulative percentage of the
(SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) was used.                    bodies, EMA and anti-TG2, were posi-                 children who became sero-negative in
                                                     tive at diagnosis. The other child with              time is shown. A comparable decline of
RESULTS                                              Marsh 2 lesions presented with failure               the proportion of children with CD who
A total of 129 of the 148 children who               to thrive and anorexia and was positive              became sero-negative for anti-TG2
were diagnosed with CD (87%) fulfilled                for EMA (HLA-typing was not per-                     and/or EMA was shown in time. After 2

PEDIATRICS Volume 128, Number 3, September 2011                                                                                                       549
                              Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on February 3, 2015
TABLE 1 Cumulative Percentage of Children With CD Who Became Seronegative for Anti-TG2 (n ⫽                our results revealed that within 3
              99) and EMA (n ⫽ 74) After Starting a Gluten-Free Diet
                                                                                                           months, the mean concentration of
                                                     Months After Starting Gluten-Free Diet
                                                                                                           anti-TG2 showed a 74% decrease (95%
                               3               6                9             12              18     24    CI: 69%–79%), and that within 11⁄2 years
Anti-TG2, %a                  11               35               41            55              64     78    the mean concentration of anti-TG2
EMA, %                        10               31               45            60              74     87
a
                                                                                                           level in children is expected to be be-
    The manufacturer’s recommended cut-off for negativity was used.
                                                                                                           low the cutoff point for negativity.
                                                                                                           We have found that, after 2 years of a
years of diagnosis, a total of 15 chil-                        point for negativity (below the ratio of    gluten-free diet, 11.6% of the children
dren (11.6%) were still sero-positive                          1) in most of the children with CD.         (n ⫽ 15) had still positive EMA and/or
for anti-TG2 and/or EMA (Table 1). Thir-                                                                   anti-TG2 antibodies (Fig1 and Table 1).
teen of the children became sero-                              DISCUSSION                                  These results illustrate that, as it has
negative within 5 years, and 2 re-                             The serologic checkup of children with      been reported before,14 the correla-
mained sero-positive after 5 years of                          CD on a gluten-free diet consists on the    tion between antibodies decreasing
diagnosis.                                                     measurement of specific celiac anti-         and clinical outcome is not 100% be-
In Fig 2, the course of the mean concen-                       bodies. Doctors, parents, and children      cause only 3 of these 15 children had
tration for anti-TG2 is illustrated (ex-                       expect that the antibodies will disap-      symptoms: 1 child had constipation
pressed in ratios, 95% CI; uncorrected                         pear after starting the gluten-free diet.   and abdominal pain; another had per-
for time). After 3 and 6 months of a                           In this study we investigated the de-       sistent isolated short stature; and a
gluten-free diet, the mean concentra-                          cline and normalization of anti-TG2 and     third had abdominal pain and head-
tion of anti-TG2 was significantly de-                          EMA in children with CD after starting      aches. In our series, 2 of these 15 chil-
creased for 74.3% (95% CI: 69%–79%,                            the treatment. First, a similar trend       dren remained sero-positive for either
P ⬍ .0001) and 83.6%, respectively                             was seen in the proportion of children      anti-TG2 or EMA after 5 years of diag-
(95% CI: 79.1%– 87.1%; P ⬍ .0001; lin-                         with CD that became sero-negative for       nosis and treatment. One child was
ear mixed model corrected for time).                           EMA and anti-TG2; within 2 years both       diagnosed with CD because of failure-
Within 18 months, the mean concentra-                          antibodies disappeared in ⬃80% of           to-thrive and high anti-TG2 levels, HLA-
tion of anti-TG2 was below the cutoff                          children with CD on a diet. Moreover,       DR3DQ2/DR4DQ8, and histologic small
                                                                                                           bowel alterations grade Marsh 3B. Af-
                                                                                                           ter starting the diet, the anti-TG2 levels
                                                                                                           decreased to borderline values within
                                                                                                           1 year, but because of errors in the
                                                                                                           gluten-free diet the anti-TG2 levels re-
                                                                                                           mained borderline positive, even 5
                                                                                                           years after the start of the treatment.
                                                                                                           The other child, who presented with
                                                                                                           failure-to-thrive and lassitude, was di-
                                                                                                           agnosed with CD on the basis of strong
                                                                                                           positive EMA and histologic small
                                                                                                           bowel lesions grade Marsh 3A (HLA-
                                                                                                           typing was not performed). Because of
                                                                                                           poor compliance with the diet, the pa-
                                                                                                           tient did not improve clinically or sero-
                                                                                                           logically despite the urge of the pedia-
                                                                                                           trician and dietician to eat gluten-free.
                                                                                                           The other 13 children who were sero-
                                                                                                           positive after 2 years of diet became
                                                                                                           sero-negative within 5 years after diag-
                                                                                                           nosis (between 24.1 and 59 months).
FIGURE 2                                                                                                   The main reason of their long-term
Mean anti-TG2 levels (ratio, 95% CI) in children with CD on a gluten-free diet (in months).                sero-positivity is possibly the long in-

550         HOGEN ESCH et al
                                           Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on February 3, 2015
ARTICLES

tervals, of ⬎1 year, between the differ-             to our findings. However, in that study              with CD had a histologic recovery
ent serologic measurements. This as-                 EMA declined faster in time than anti-              within 2 years of treatment,14 which
pect is a limitation of our study                    TG2, which is different to our findings              confirms previous findings in chil-
because the participating centers did                that revealed a similar trend of nor-               dren.19 This suggests that the 2-year
not follow a standardized protocol                   malization for EMA and anti-TG2. It                 period that is necessary for the histo-
with specific time points for the mea-                would have been interesting to evalu-               logic recovery correlates with the time
surement of the CD antibodies, but fol-              ate the course of DGP in our patients,              needed for normalization of the CD an-
lowed their local control protocols. We              but the antibody determinations were                tibodies. In our series, only 16 of the
cannot be sure that the children were                performed between 2001 and 2009,                    129 children (12%) had a second bi-
already sero-negative before the mo-                 when the DGP’s were not established                 opsy after a mean time of 1.5 years
ment of measurement. For these rea-                  yet in the standard serologic analyses              (SD ⫾ 0.4 years) on a gluten-free diet,
sons we describe in this study the max-              for CD. A 2-year follow-up for anti-TG2             and 15 of them had normalization of the
imum time for disappearance of the                   (IgA and IgG) in Spanish children with              small bowel mucosa and were sero-
specific antibodies in childhood CD.                  CD, measured at different time points               negative at the moment of the control
Another limitation of our study is that              during a gluten-free diet, has been re-
                                                                                                         biopsy. The CD-specific antibodies de-
we have used 8 different anti-TG2 tests              ported previously.14 The findings were
                                                                                                         crease and histologic recovery corre-
in our patients. To compare the quan-                similar to the ones in our study, and
                                                                                                         lated well in these children, except for 1
titative values from the different anti-             within the first 3 months of a gluten-
                                                                                                         child who had still small bowel lesions
TG2 tests, we have solved this problem               free diet the mean concentration of
                                                                                                         (M3B) after a 1.6-year gluten-free diet,
by calculating the ratio of each anti-               anti-TG2 (IgA and IgG) decreased signif-
                                                                                                         despite having negative antibodies after
TG2 measurement.                                     icantly. Moreover, 2 years after the
                                                                                                         9 months on the diet. As described in the
Serologic follow-up of specific CD anti-              start of the diet, 85% of the children
                                                     were IgA anti-TG2 negative, which is                child’s patient file, he had a poor compli-
bodies measured at different time                                                                        ance with the diet.
points has been described before in                  comparable to our findings.14 In an-
patients with CD, but the present study              other study, it has also been shown
                                                                                                         CONCLUSIONS
is the first to report the results for                that in IgA-deficient children, IgG anti-
both anti-TG2 and EMA in a large cohort              TG2 decreases more slowly than IgA en               Parents, children (if age-appropriate),
of children with CD children. In adults,             IgG anti-TG2 in IgA-competent chil-                 and doctors who care for children with
a 1-year follow-up was performed for                 dren.14,18 Most of the IgA-deficient chil-           CD should be aware that the mean con-
anti-TG2, EMA, and for IgA and IgG anti-             dren were still positive for IgG anti-TG2           centration of anti-TG2 will have a 74%
deamidated gliadin peptides (DGPs).12                after ⬎2 or 3 years on a gluten-free                decrease after 3 months of gluten-free
The significant decline of the mean                   diet.18                                             diet, and that ⬃80% of the children will
concentration of anti-TG2, and anti-                 In the Spanish follow-up study it was               be sero-negative for EMA and anti-TG2
DGP, within 3 months was comparable                  shown that the majority of children                 after 2 years of diet.
REFERENCES
 1. Armstrong MJ, Robins GG, Howdle PD. Re-           6. Rostom A, Dube C, Cranney A, et al. The di-      9. Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Giorgetti GM. Lack
    cent advances in coeliac disease. Curr Opin          agnostic accuracy of serologic tests for ce-        of usefulness of anti-transglutaminase an-
    Gastroenterol. 2009;25(2):100 –109                   liac disease: a systematic review. Gastroen-        tibodies in assessing histologic recovery af-
 2. Mearin ML. Celiac disease among children             terology. 2005;128(4 suppl 1):S38 –S46              ter gluten-free diet in celiac disease. J Clin
    and adolescents. Curr Probl Pediatr Ado-          7. Walker-Smith JA, Guandalini S, Schmitz J, et        Gastroenterol. 2003;37(5):387–391
    lesc Health Care. 2007;37(3):86 –105                 al. Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac   10. Ciacci C, Cirillo M, Cavallaro R, et al. Long-term
 3. Green PH, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J        disease. Report of Working Group of Euro-           follow-up of celiac adults on gluten-free diet:
    Med. 2007;357(17):1731–1743                          pean Society of Paediatric Gastroenterol-           prevalence and correlates of intestinal damage.
 4. Dicke, W. K. Coeliac Disease: Investigation of       ogy and Nutrition. Arch Dis Child. 1990;            Digestion. 2002;66(3):178–185
    the Harmful Effects of Certain Types of Ce-          65(8):909 –911                                  11. Kaukinen K, Sulkanen S, Maki M, et al. IgA-
    real on Patients With Coeliac Disease [doc-       8. Fabiani E, Catassi C. The serum IgA class           class transglutaminase antibodies in evalu-
    toral thesis]. Utrecht, Netherlands: Univer-         anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies in          ating the efficacy of gluten-free diet in coe-
    sity of Utrecht; 1950                                the diagnosis and follow up of coeliac              liac disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
 5. Sollid LM, Markussen G, Ek J, et al. Evidence        disease: results of an international multi-         2002;14(3):311–315
    for a primary association of celiac disease          centre study. International Working Group       12. Sugai E, Nachman F, Vaquez H, et al. Dynam-
    to a particular HLA-DQ alpha/beta het-               on Eu-tTG. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol.             ics of celiac disease-specific serology after
    erodimer. J Exp Med. 1989;169(1):345–350             2001;13(6):659 – 665                                initiation of a gluten-free diet and use in the

PEDIATRICS Volume 128, Number 3, September 2011                                                                                                           551
                               Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on February 3, 2015
assessment of compliance with treatment.              15. Hansson T, Dahlbom I, Rogberg S, et al.                    comparison between antigliadin, antireti-
    Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42(5):352–358                         Recombinant human tissue transglutami-                     culin, and antiendomysial antibodies. Clin
13. Troncone R, Mayer M, Spagnuolo F, et al.                  nase for diagnosis and follow-up of child-                 Exp Immunol. 1994;95(1):78 – 82
    Endomysial antibodies as unreliable mark-                 hood coeliac disease. Pediatr Res. 2002;               18. Korponay-Szabo IR, Dahlbom I, Laurila K, et
    ers for slight dietary transgressions in ad-              51(6):700 –705                                             al. Elevation of IgG antibodies against tissue
    olescents with celiac disease. J Pediatr Gas-         16. Marsh MN. Gluten, major histocompatibility                 transglutaminase as a diagnostic tool for
    troenterol Nutr. 1995;21(1):69 –72                        complex, and the small intestine: a molecular              coeliac disease in selective IgA deficiency.
14. Martin-Pagola A, Ortiz-Paranza L, Bilbao JR, et al.       and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum                Gut. 2003;52(11):1567–1571
    Two-year follow-up of anti-transglutaminase au-           of gluten sensitivity (‘celiac sprue’). Gastroenter-   19. George EK, Mearin ML, Franken HC, et al.
    toantibodies among celiac children on gluten-             ology. 1992;102(1):330–354                                 Twenty years of childhood coeliac disease
    free diet: comparison of IgG and IgA. Autoimmu-       17. Lerner A, Kumar V, Iancu TC. Immunological                 in the Netherlands: a rapidly increasing in-
    nity. 2007;40(2):117–121                                  diagnosis of childhood coeliac disease:                    cidence? Gut. 1997;40(1):61– 66

                                                             SODA REVIVAL: “The sodas were really good,” said my wife. She was talking
                                                             about the carbonated drinks that a friend of the family had made for her that
                                                             evening. We don’t drink much soda in our house so my wife’s enthusiasm was
                                                             surprising. When she suggested that we should investigate purchasing a small
                                                             home soda making system, I was pretty much floored. “You can mix all kinds of
                                                             syrups and flavors” she explained. Little did she realize that not only was she
                                                             describing soda production at the turn of the 20th century, but also my father’s
                                                             first job. In the early 20th century, refrigeration was still uncommon. Fizzy water
                                                             was a novelty and associated with curative medicinal powers. People looking
                                                             for a refreshing drink could order any one of myriad sodas, or carbonated
                                                             beverages, from a store that had a soda fountain—the machine that carbon-
                                                             ated the fluid. The soda makers were called soda jerks, a title that my father still
                                                             wears proudly, because of the motion they made while mixing the drink. Before
                                                             iceless refrigeration became more commonplace the drinks were initially
                                                             chilled with blocks of ice. Once carbonated beverages could be easily capped
                                                             and people could buy a soda almost anywhere, the job of the soda jerk disap-
                                                             peared. So did much of the variation in sodas. However, according to an article
                                                             in The New York Times (Dining: July 5, 2011), soda fountains and soda jerks may
                                                             be making a small comeback, particularly in large metropolitan centers. Mod-
                                                             ern soda jerks have embraced the locavore movement and offer high quality
                                                             seasonal, home-made, locally sourced drinks often with eclectic flavors. Instead
                                                             of serving a cola drink, modern soda jerks may create new drinks incorporating
                                                             vanilla, milk, olive oil, and salt or recreate old fashioned recipes with phos-
                                                             phoric acid and tea. Regardless of the flavor, all soda jerks agree that a soda
                                                             fountain must have a carbonator and taps as that is the only way to generate
                                                             vigorous bubbles. As for us, we have yet to purchase a home carbonator system,
                                                             but I certainly have enjoyed discussing sodas with my father. As a former expert
                                                             soda jerk, he promises to teach me how to make flips, fizzes, ades, yips, and even
                                                             malts. I am not sure what they all are, but I am certainly willing to try them.
                                                                                                                                                  Noted by WVR, MD

552      HOGEN ESCH et al
                                         Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on February 3, 2015
Specific Celiac Disease Antibodies in Children on a Gluten-Free Diet
Caroline E. Hogen Esch, Victorien M. Wolters, Susan A. M. Gerritsen, Hein Putter, B.
 Mary von Blomberg, Ingrid M. W. van Hoogstraten, Roderick H. J. Houwen, Nico
                         van der Lely and M. Luisa Mearin
       Pediatrics 2011;128;547; originally published online August 22, 2011;
                           DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3762
 Updated Information &                including high resolution figures, can be found at:
 Services                             http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/128/3/547.full.ht
                                      ml
 References                           This article cites 18 articles, 4 of which can be accessed free
                                      at:
                                      http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/128/3/547.full.ht
                                      ml#ref-list-1
 Subspecialty Collections             This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in
                                      the following collection(s):
                                      Gastroenterology
                                      http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/gastroenter
                                      ology_sub
                                      Nutrition
                                      http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/nutrition_s
                                      ub
 Permissions & Licensing              Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures,
                                      tables) or in its entirety can be found online at:
                                      http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xht
                                      ml
 Reprints                             Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
                                      http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml

 PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly
 publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published,
 and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk
 Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2011 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All
 rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275.

              Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on February 3, 2015
Specific Celiac Disease Antibodies in Children on a Gluten-Free Diet
Caroline E. Hogen Esch, Victorien M. Wolters, Susan A. M. Gerritsen, Hein Putter, B.
 Mary von Blomberg, Ingrid M. W. van Hoogstraten, Roderick H. J. Houwen, Nico
                         van der Lely and M. Luisa Mearin
       Pediatrics 2011;128;547; originally published online August 22, 2011;
                           DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3762

  The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
                         located on the World Wide Web at:
           http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/128/3/547.full.html

   PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly
   publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned,
   published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point
   Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2011 by the American Academy
   of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275.

             Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on February 3, 2015
You can also read