Silver 2018 Sponsor - CPM Group Silver Reception at the 2018 PDAC - Amazon AWS
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
CPM Group Silver Reception at the PDAC March 2018 CPM Group 168 Seventh St., Suite 310 Brooklyn, NY 11215 U.S.A. Telephone: 212-785-8320 E-mail: info@cpmgroup.com Website: www.cpmgroup.com Copyrighted 2018 - CPM Group _____________________________________________________________ Not for reproduction without written consent of CPM Group. The information contained here has been obtained from sources believed reliable. We believe this information to be reliable, but do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Opinions expressed here represent those of CPM Group at the time of publication. This material is for the private use of clients. We are not soliciting any action based on it. Information contained here should not be relied on as specific investment or market timing advice. At times the principals and associates of CPM Group may have long or short positions in some of the markets mentioned in this report. 2
14th Annual CPM Silver Reception at the PDAC 2018 Sponsor: Endeavour Silver Corp. 3
Endeavour Silver Corp. NYSE: EXK, TSX: EDR Endeavour Silver Corp (NYSE: EXK, TSX: EDR) is a mid-tier precious metals mining company that operates three high-grade, underground, silver-gold mines in Mexico. The Company is forecasting a 20% increase in production to 10.2-11.2 mil- lion oz silver equivalent in 2018. Endeavour has a compelling pipeline of explora- tion and development projects to facilitate its goal to become a premier senior silver producer. The Company’s fourth mine, El Compas in Zacatecas state, will be in production this year and the Terronera Project in Jalisco state is awaiting final per- mits and a production decision to become Endeavour’s fifth producing mine. Our philosophy of corporate social integrity creates value for all stakeholders, delivering long term sustainable growth. Why Invest in Endeavour? MID-TIER PRECIOUS METALS EXPERIENCED MANAGEMENT PRODUCER TEAM Three high-grade silver-gold mines Proven track record with in Mexico exploration, development and operational expertise Our mission is to create value for STRONG ORGANIC our shareholders and become a GROWTH PROFILE STRONG BALANCE premier silver producer in the SHEET Building new mines to silver mining industry. increase production and $66.2 million working reduce costs capital, no debt (as at 12/31/2017) PURE SILVER/ GOLD LEVERAGE No base metals, no hedging & industry leading beta to silver price (60/40 silver gold producer) Contact Details PO Box 10328 1130-609 Granville Street Vancouver, BC Canada V7Y 1G5 Tel: 604.987.1828 info@edrsilver.com 4
Silver CPM GROUP 5
Monthly Average Comex Through January 2018 $/Ounce $/Ounce 45 45 40 40 35 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15 17 Silver’s price performance was relatively lackluster during 2017, with prices rising at half the pace of gold prices. Silver finished 2017 at $17.14, up from $15.98 at the end of 2016. On an annual average basis silver prices actually fell slightly, to $17.09 in 2017 from $17.14 in 2016. This was compared to a 9.3% increase in 2016 from the previous year. The lackluster performance of silver over the course of 2017 was in sharp contrast to that in the previous year, when shorter term trend-following investors joined longer term investors in purchasing enough silver to drive prices sharply higher. It is important to remember that while the annual average price of silver was basically flat last year the price did finish 2017 higher than where it started. Silver prices started 2017 on a strong note. The metal was unable to hold onto its gains, however, taking an especially hard beating toward the end of the year when institutional investors on the Comex build large short positions in the metal and drove prices down sharply. While gold was able to withstand a lot of the economic headwinds, silver, its more volatile cousin, saw prices respond more dramatically. While global political turmoil throughout 2017 prevented prices from declining significantly below levels seen in 2016 the relatively healthy economic environment kept a lid on prices. Continued strength in the equities markets played a part in weighing on silver prices throughout 2017. Silver prices are forecast to average $17.43 in 2018, up 2.0% over 2017. While growth in silver prices is forecast to outpace growth in gold prices during 2018, the relative value of silver is expected to continue lagging that of gold. At the end of 2017 the gold to silver ra- tio stood at 77. This ratio is expected to decline over the course of 2018, to around 73 on an annual average basis. This is still well above the historical average of 56, however. Silver prices are forecast to rise sharply, possibly back to 2011 levels or higher, over the next five to seven years. A combination of silver’s supply and demand fundamentals, mac- roeconomic, political, and financial market factors are expected to come together to boost silver prices back to these high levels. 6
Silver Market Balance Annual, Projected Through 2018. Prices through 2017. $/Ounce Million Ounces 45 250 Net Additions Net Changes in Inventories 40 200 35 150 30 100 25 50 20 0 15 Net Withdrawals -50 10 -100 Nominal Price 5 (LHS) -150 0 -200 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 The silver market balance shown here is the classical view of market surpluses or deficits: Total supply compared to fabrication demand. The net additions represent years of surpluses of newly refined silver entering the market from mines and scrap recovery over fabrication demand. The years of net withdrawals are periods when fabricators want more silver than is being refined, and bid silver away from inventory holders (investors and market makers) in order to meet their needs. Much of the surpluses are taken up by investors, but that is not always the case. In the sur- plus years from 1979 through 1990 market makers — bullion banks and trading companies — bought and held several hundred million ounces of silver for a time, when neither inves- tors nor fabricators wanted the metal. In the silver market, investors wield major power in determining the price. Silver surpluses, such as we have had since 2005, are caused by investors bidding up the price of silver, pay- ing higher prices than industrial users are willing to pay. Thus, silver surpluses are related to higher prices, while deficits are related to lower prices. When investors want more silver than is readily available, they have to pay higher prices to redirect silver to their holdings. When they want less silver, they sell into the market, depressing the price. At times like that, as in the 1980s, bullion banks and dealers take up the surpluses. In this way silver, as a fi- nancial asset, has distinct market conditions in contrast to those of industrial metals such as copper, steel, and lead. People sometimes ask if it is incongruous to see prices rise during periods of large surpluses, and fall during times of large deficits. It is not incongruous if you realize that the surpluses represent great demand for silver from investors bidding the price up to get additional metal, while the deficits represent periods when investors are net sellers of silver. 7
Investment Demand by Major Investment Vehicle Mln Oz Mln Oz 250 250 Net Investment Demand Bullion 200 200 ETPs 150 150 Coins 100 100 50 50 0 0 -50 -50 -100 -100 -150 -150 -200 -200 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018p Note: Bars represent gross investment demand. Investors have remained net buyers of silver since 2006. This continued investor interest in silver is in contrast to the years prior to 2006. The charts on the previous page and above show that prior to 2006 investors and other in- ventory holders as a group actually were net sellers of silver, a trend that had first emerged in 1990 and lasted until 2005. An estimated 2.2 billion ounces of silver was sold from in- ventories during that time, including metal sold by market makers. Investors, and other in- ventory holders, shifted from being a net source of supply – selling into the market – to a net source of demand, becoming net buyers of silver, in 2006. They have continued to add his- torically high volumes of silver to their collective holdings ever since then. From 2006 through 2017 investors are calculated to have bought 1.4 billion ounces of silver, a remarka- ble amount of metal. In 2017 investors are estimated to have purchased 108.1 million ounces on a net basis worldwide. This was down from even greater volumes in recent years, but it nonetheless represented historically strong investor interest in silver. During the 11 years of steady large silver purchases since 2006 there has been a major shift in how investors buy and hold silver. With the advent of exchange traded silver funds in 2006, a shift toward silver ETFs from silver large bars had been in vogue for a few years. But as silver prices rose sharply after 2006, there was another major shift, away from both 1,000-ounce silver bullion bars and ETFs to silver bullion coins, due to a combination of the increasing value in silver and rising investor concerns about economic, financial, and politi- cal stability. Last year was a continuance from 2016 where investors were selling silver in 1,000-ounce bar form and in other forms and buying coins, albeit at a slower pace. This trend is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. 8
Coinage Demand Through 2017 MOz MOz 150 150 China 140 140 130 Other Countries 130 120 Mexico 120 110 Germany 110 100 France 100 90 Austria 90 80 Canada 80 70 United States 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15 17 Investors bought an estimated 84.4 million ounces of silver in coin form last year. This was down 38.8% from 137.9 million ounces in 2016. Much of the decline in silver coin sales came from a sharp decline in U.S. Mint silver coins, with coin sales falling during most of 2017 and only rebounding in December. This sharp decline in silver (and gold) coin demand has been in line with a trend that has been in place over the past year. Investors in these products appear to have pulled back from making as large of purchases in these products as they did in recent years. Many of the in- vestors who purchased these products bought them as a hedge against the collapse of the financial and currency markets, or a hyperinflation that never came. These concerns were heightened during and after the Great Recession and Global Financial Crisis due to the un- precedented monetary easing by central banks beginning in 2008. Since then many of these investors have come to think that the currency markets and finan- cial system as we know them are not likely to collapse any time soon, and so they would not need silver and gold coins to help them buy things. Furthermore, the option of ETFs allows investors to have easy access to silver and gold if they wish to carry it in their portfolio. The cost of carry and transaction costs of ETFs are significantly lower than that of coins. 9
Silver Exchange Traded Product Holdings Through January 2018 Mln Oz 800 HK Silver Japan 700 SSLV SSLN 600 WITE GLTR 500 PSLV iShares Canada ZKB SBT.U Julius Baer 400 SIVR MSL AU 300 SLV 200 100 CEF 0 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Investors were net sellers of silver exchange traded funds (ETFs) in 2017, with a net sale of 6.5 million ounces of silver from their holdings during the year. While a decline, this reduc- tion accounted for only 1% of the total silver held in these investment products. With the exception of May 2017 when investors purchased large volumes of silver in response to a price decline, during the other months of the year there was a positive correlation between the prices and sales and purchases made by investors. That is: Investors typically were sellers when prices declined and buyers when prices rose. This suggests that these (short- term) investors are driven more by momentum than by value. Silver ETF holdings rose from their inception in 2006 into 2011. Since 2011 silver ETF holdings have demonstrated a surprising amount of stability. While investors have sold off large volumes of gold ETFs and then rebuilt them, and sold off significant portions of their platinum and palladium ETF holdings, silver ETF investors have shown resilience in hold- ing on to their metal. CPM’s analysis suggests that this reflects that silver ETF holdings belong to long-term silver investors who shifted their silver holdings from bars to ETF shares starting in 2006. These investors are long-term, committed silver holders. Gold, platinum, and palladium ETF investors appear to be newer investors in terms of holding physical metal. Many of the ETF investors for these metals appear to be investors who pre- viously had invested in mining shares rather than physical bullion. As such, they have dif- ferent investment profiles that lend themselves more readily to buying and selling based on shorter and intermediate term price trends, while the majority of the silver ETF investors are long-term buy and hold investors. 10
Non-Commercial Gross Long and Short Silver Positions Comex Futures & Options. Weekly Data, Through 30 January 2018 Mln Ozs Mln Ozs 700 700 600 600 500 500 Long Net Fund Position in Comex 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 0 0 -100 -100 -200 -200 Short -300 -300 -400 -400 A-95 J-97 O-99 J-02 A-04 J-06 O-08 J-11 A-13 J-15 O-17 Different from investor interest in silver ETFs, investor interest in the New York Comex silver futures and options markets held up well during the most part of last year, only to fall sharply December 2017. The chart above shows the gross long and short positions, as well as the net positions, of large investors on the Comex silver futures and options contracts. The “Non-commercial” category in futures market data includes a wide range of institutional investors, ranging from commodity trade advisors and commodity pool operators to hedge funds, general investment funds, family offices, and other large investors. As illustrated in the chart above, net long positions held by institutional investors on the Comex silver futures and options contracts declined sharply during December. By 19 De- cember these positions had declined to a mere 3.32 million ounces, the lowest level of net long positions since November 2014, when they had declined to 730,000 ounces. The sharp decline in December 2017 was the result of both an increase in gross short positions and a decline in gross long positions. The buildup in gross short positions was much more dra- matic, with gross shorts shooting up to 375.3 million ounces on 19 December from 158.5 million ounces at the end of November. Over that same period, gross longs had slipped to 378.6 million ounces, from 448.7 million ounces. The recovery in silver prices in the following sessions led holders of shorts to liquidate their positions. The liquidation of these shorts in turn helped silver prices rebound from their De- cember lows. In November 2014, when net long positions had declined sharply, they rose over the ensuing weeks to reach 227 million ounces by the middle of February 2015, before they reversed course once again. 11
Chinese Silver Imports and Exports Monthly, Through December 2017 Moz Moz 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 -5 -5 -10 -10 Gross Imports -15 -15 Gross Exports -20 -20 Net Trade -25 -25 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Even though China is the second largest mining country for silver, and possibly the largest refiner of silver in the world including metal from scrap, it still imports additionally silver consistently. This is because in addition to being a major producer of refined silver, the country also has very large fabrication demands for silver as well as large apparent invest- ment demand. China was a net importer of 57.35 million ounces of silver last year. This was 12.35 million ounces or 27.5% higher than the 44.99 million ounces imported in 2016. China is the world’s largest silver using country, consuming an estimated 197.6 million ounces in 2017. Another 24.6 million ounces of silver were used in silver coins and metals that are investment products last year in China. Refined production in China totaled an estimated 306.5 million ounces in 2017. Of this, 140.3 million ounces were refined from domestically mined output. Another 26.8 million ounces were refined from secondary supply sources. The remaining 139.3 million ounces were refined from imported mine concentrates and ores. Apart from the fabrication demand mentioned above, there appears to be a large amount of silver bought by investors. The 24.6 million ounces of silver coins would be included in this. In addition, the balance of refined silver entering the Chinese market relative to identi- fied offtake in fabricated products and exports suggests strong ongoing investor demand in China. Precise numbers are not available, but there is a net surplus of total new supply rela- tive to fabrication demand in most years. In 2017 that surplus was 108.9 million ounces, before accounting for net imports of 57.35 million ounces. 12
Annual Total Silver Supply Projected Through 2018 Million Ounces Million Ounces 1,100 1,100 1,000 1,000 Net Exports from Tran. Econ. 900 900 Government Disposals 800 800 700 700 Secondary 600 600 500 500 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 Mine Production 100 0 0 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18p Total supply of silver, primarily from mine production and secondary supply, is estimated to have declined 1.1% to 998.1 million ounces in 2017 from 1,009.6 million ounces in 2016. Both mine supply and secondary supply of the metal declined during the year, but a faster pace of decline in mine supply was largely responsible for the 1.1% decline in silver total supplies during 2017. Global silver mine supply is estimated to have slipped to 876.9 mil- lion ounces in 2017, down 1.0% from 885.7 million ounces in the previous year. Major silver producing countries saw declining production, including Australia, Peru, and the United States. Production losses occurred at a mix of primary silver mines as well as byproduct mines in these countries. Total secondary supply, including scrap recovery, government disposals, and net exports from transitional economies, is estimated to have declined slightly to 202.0 million ounces in 2017 from 203.0 million ounces in 2016. This rate of decline was significantly slower than the sharper declines in scrap recovery between 2013 and 2015, when secondary sup- plies of silver plunged 27.8% from 2012 levels in the face of declining prices. The lackluster silver price performance during 2017 weighed on silver scrap recovery, which otherwise most likely would have risen from the levels in 2016. Heading into 2018 total supply is forecast to rise, driven by increases in both mine supply and secondary supply. Total silver supply is expected to rise 2.1% to 1,018.8 million ounces in 2018, up 2.1% from 2017. The increase in silver mine supply is the result of a strong in- crease forecast for Mexican mine production as well as a positive impact on silver second- ary supply from the increase in prices. While the forecast strength in silver prices is ex- pected to continue supporting silver scrap supply in the medium term, mine supply is fore- cast to decline in 2019 and beyond, which is expected to weigh on total silver supply. 13
Annual Total Fabrication Demand Projected Through 2018 Million Ounces 1,000 Photovoltaic 1,000 Imports into Trans Economies 900 Other Countries 900 Other Uses 800 Biocides 800 Superconductors 700 Electronics 700 Jewelry & Silverware 600 600 Photography 500 500 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 0 0 77 80 83 86 89 92 95 98 01 04 07 10 13 16 Fabrication demand plays an important role influencing silver prices. Fabrication demand for silver is estimated to have dropped 1.2% from 2016 to 889.9 million ounces in 2017. A decline in silver use in the photovoltaic sector, after a record year in 2016 led to unsold in- ventories of silver-bearing solar panels, was one of the primary reasons driving demand for silver lower during the year. More silver is used in the manufacture of jewelry and silverware than in any other use. This really is a hodge-podge of uses, including traditional silver jewelry, investment-oriented silver jewelry in some parts of the world, and a wide range of decorative objects and reli- gious statues lumped together and called silverware. Silver use in these products is estimat- ed to have risen to a fresh record high of 303.4 million ounces in 2017. Prices were lower in 2015 compared to 2017, and silver use in jewelry and silver decorative products is sensitive to the price of the metal. Pent-up jewelry demand in India, after the Indian government in late 2016 demonetarized large bank notes, and the ongoing trend of increasing use of silver in lighter karat gold jewelry helped underpin demand for silver in jewelry during 2017. Demand from the electronics sector, the second largest use of silver, also rose to a fresh rec- ord of 229.6 million ounces in 2017, up 1.5% from 2016. The bulk of the demand increase is estimated to have still come from consumer electronics. Continued inventory drawdown in the electronics industry also provided some support. Apart from consumer electronics, developments in automotive electronics, medical electronic devices, and automation-related industrial electronic products helped underpin silver use in the electronics industry. The downtrend in silver demand from the photography sector continued in 2017, with de- mand from this sector slipping to 62.5 million ounces. The downtrend in the silver use in photography is expected to continue in coming years. 14
Annual Silver Demand for Photovoltaic Solar Panels Projected Through 2018 Mln Oz Mln Oz 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18p While the amount of silver used in solar panels is smaller than that in jewelry and electron- ics, it is the growth rate that helps the PV sector stand out to drive overall silver demand growth higher. In fact, demand from solar panels overtook the photography sector in 2016 to become the third-largest source of silver use after jewelry and electronics. In 2017 the photovoltaic (PV) industry remained the third largest use of silver, after having surpassed photography in the previous year, although demand for this source is estimated to have declined during 2017 after a record year in 2016. Silver use in solar panels is estimat- ed to have declined to around 68.7 million ounces in 2017, down 19.9% year-on-year. This estimated decline came after record growth in key markets such as the United States and China, where stellar growth was largely a result of demand being pulled into 2016 from fu- ture years due to policy uncertainty. As is the case with many technologies, there has been a great effort over the years to reduce the amount of precious metals used per unit of power generation via solar panels. One of the primary costs associated with technologies that use precious metals is the precious metal being used. The amount of silver used per cell of a solar panel is down by around half be- tween 2011 and 2016. That said, reducing the per unit precious metal content makes the technology more affordable and therefore quite often more widely adopted. Silver demand from the PV sector is forecast to continue rising because of the increase in the volume of solar panels that are being produced. Global silver use in solar panels is expected to rise at a healthy pace over the next decade due to ongoing efforts by governments to push for renewable energy use. Emerging markets also are expected to start contributing in a more meaningful way. 15
CPM GROUP 168 Seventh St. Suite 310 Brooklyn, NY 11215 info@cpmgroup.com www.cpmgroup.com Consulting Research Investment Banking Advisory services on a range Gold, Silver, and Platinum Financial advisory services of issues related to commod- Group Metals Yearbooks for emerging commodities ities markets. producing companies. Precious Metals Advisory Financial and physical man- monthlies. Debt financing advisory ser- agement of commodities vices. exposure. Base Metals Advisory monthlies. Matching investments to Business development and potential institutional and strategic planning. Long-term studies on indi- individual investors. Specific topics related to vidual commodities. Analysis appraising invest- supply or demand. Special client reports. ments. Commodities Management Asset Management Analytical and advisory ser- Hedging advisory and man- vices related to commodities agement services. investments. Advice and management of Management and execution sales and purchasing pro- of specific investments. grams. Managed accounts. Advice on materials manage- ment for commodities pro- ducers and consumers. 16
You can also read