Serlecourt ANNUAL CASE REVIEW 2020 - Serle Court
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
“Stacked with highly experienced silks and juniors, Serle Court has long “one of been one best the very of the leading commercial setschancery when it sets, comes to andcivil onefraud of thedisputes” few that Legal 500 genuinely competes in both traditional chancery and commercial litigation” Chambers UK
serlecourt I am extremely proud to introduce the 2020 Annual Review in what is my last year as Head of Chambers at Serle Court. In what was a year different to any other we have experienced, Serle Court has again been involved in some of the most complex and interesting Commercial and Chancery cases across a wide range of practice areas and in many jurisdictions. Whilst the new experience of virtual trials and hearings has changed the way we conduct legal process, it has not changed the nature of the cases which again include, some high profile, some legally complex, and others establishing key legal principles. The selection of cases in this Annual Review includes many before the higher courts, the Courts of Appeal in the UK and other jurisdictions, the Supreme Court and Privy Council. Alan Boyle QC Head of Chambers 02
In 2020, Serle Court was involved in many substantial, high-profile, and precedent-setting cases Elizabeth Jones QC, Justin 20 April 2020). Richard Wilson Higgo QC, Gareth Tilley, Paul QC (assisted by James Weale) Adams, Zahler Bryan and Oliver acts for Tony Wang, an intervenor Jones continue to act for Kea in the appeal. The Plaintiffs and Investments in the ongoing Tony Wang have each been litigation against Eric Watson, granted leave to appeal to the following the substantial Judicial Committee of the Privy judgment obtained against Mr Council. Watson for deceit and breach of fiduciary duty in 2018. This year Elizabeth Jones QC and Oliver resulted in notable decisions Jones are acting for the eOne on the circumstances in which group, a major international a defendant can have resort producer of material for film and to assets subject to a freezing TV (e.g. the film ‘Green Book’ or proprietary injunction when and ‘Peppa Pig’), in proceedings there is an unsatisfied judgment against Monex Europe Ltd and debt ([2020] EWHC 472 (Ch)), eOne’s former Treasury Manager. a judgment creditor’s right to be The claim arises out of the subrogated to the position of a paying of secret commissions bank that had used money held on to fiduciaries, alleging that trust for the judgment creditor to Monex paid some £8m of secret satisfy debts of its customer, the commissions to eOne’s Treasury judgment debtor ([2020] EWHC Manager and his deputy in order 309 (Ch)) and, in a judgment to induce them to place FX trades reaffirming the risk taken by with Monex. The 4-week trial is litigants who deliberately breach listed for March 2021. court orders, Mr Watson was committed to prison for 4 months Philip Marshall QC, Jonathan for failing to disclose assets which Harris QC (Hon.) and James were made available for his use Mather are acting for Abu Dhabi ([2020] EWHC 2599 (Ch); [2020] Commercial Bank in State of Qatar EWHC 2796 (Ch)). Mr Watson’s v Emirates NBD Bank, one of the application to stay the committal largest claims to be brought in order was refused. the English High Court, in which claims are brought against the Dakis Hagen QC (assisted by bank by the State of Qatar in Emma Hargreaves) acts for the conspiracy said to arise out of Plaintiffs and Jonathan Adkin QC an alleged international scheme (assisted by Adil Mohamedbhai) to manipulate the value of Qatari acts for the Defendant trustee currency and bonds connected in Wong & Anor v Grand View with the so-called ‘blockade’ of Private Trust Company Ltd, a Qatar by neighbouring Gulf states claim to recover substantial trust causing the Qatari Central Bank property transferred to a trustee to have to deposit US$13 billion to of a purpose trust. The Plaintiffs defend its currency peg. succeeded in obtaining summary judgment at first instance on the Philip Marshall QC and Matthew ground that powers of addition and Morrison continue to act for exclusion cannot be exercised in Business Energy Solutions (BES) a manner which alters or destroys in respect of proceedings arising the substratum of the trust ([2019] from the obtaining and execution SC (Bda) 37 Com (5 June 2019)), of search warrants, and an ongoing but this was overturned by the trading standards investigation into Bermuda Court of Appeal in April BES’s affairs. The claims, which 2020 (Civil Appeal No. 5A of 2019, seek damages for misfeasance
in public office and just satisfaction Philip Jones QC was successful under the Human Rights Act 1998, in the Privy Council in Shanda raise novel points of public and Games. This was an appeal private law including immunity from from the Cayman Islands and suit. The 12-day trial commences in was the first case to reach the November 2021. Privy Council in relation to the determination of the ‘fair value’ Philip Marshall QC and James of shares owned by those Mather are acting for Dr Vijay who dissent to the merger of a Mallya, the former Chairman of company as part of a de-listing of Kingfisher Airlines, in relation to shares. Philip was also involved a bankruptcy petition presented in a lengthy trial at first instance in by a consortium of Indian banks the Cayman Islands in Trina Solar on the basis of an alleged debt involving the same jurisdiction. in excess of £1bn and in the context of substantial overlapping Philip Jones QC and Hugh proceedings in India. It was held Norbury QC are each instructed in a judgment of Chief ICC Judge on behalf of separate Defendants Briggs in April 2020 ([2020] BPIR in the major commercial fraud case 990) that the petitioner banks had of Vale v Steinmetz & Ors, arising failed to disclose the security they out of a failed mining joint venture held over the assets of Dr Mallya in Guinea. The claim is for nearly in India, rendering the petition US$2 billion. defective. There is an ongoing dispute as to whether the banks Philip Jones QC and Gareth Tilley can now amend the petition. The are acting for HMRC in HMRC case also raises important issues v IGE USA Investments Ltd, a in regarding, among other things, claim arising from the Revenue’s validation of legal expenses and contention that it has rescinded forum conveniens in respect of tax settlements with the UK insolvency proceedings. Subgroup of the US conglomerate worth upwards of £650m. The Philip Jones QC appeared in a trial is to take place in late 2021. An 5-day Court of Appeal hearing interlocutory decision of Zacaroli in the BVI in the long running J reported at [2020] EWHC 2121 Peckson case involving the (Ch) permitting the Claimants to ownership of shares in a BVI amend to allege fraud is currently company which was the ultimate on appeal to the Court of Appeal owner of a casino and hotel in raising the question of what if Macau. This followed a 5-week any limitation period applies to retrial. The case had already been equitable claims for rescission to the Privy Council, which had ordered a retrial. 04
on the basis of fraudulent which the Claimant has been misrepresentation. given permission to appeal. In Re Infund LLP, John Machell David Blayney QC, Sophie QC and Dan McCourt Fritz act for Holcombe and Sophia Hurst the appellants in respect of a claim continue to represent the brought by Grupo Mexico seeking Claimants in the group action to avoid the restoration of an LLP against British Airways over its to the Register of Companies. The 2018 customer data breach. case will be heard by the Supreme With over 16,000 claimants, the Court in October 2021 and claim is now the largest ever data concerns the proper construction protection and privacy group and effect of section 1096 of the action in England and Wales. Companies Act 2006. In Re Dinglis Properties Ltd, John Machell QC acts for the Daniel Lightman QC and appellants in ITG Limited v Gregor Hogan represented the Glennalla Properties Limited in an respondents to a section 994 appeal to the Privy Council. The petition. In a landmark judgment case concerns issues relating to in June 2020 ([2020] 2 BCLC the insolvency of trusts including 607), Adam Johnson QC (sitting the priority between the indemnity as a deputy High Court Judge) claims of successive trustees, and considered the impact of the between trustees and outside Covid-19 crisis on the share creditors. purchase order which he had previously made. Jonathan Adkin QC, Sophie Holcombe and Jamie Randall Dakis Hagen QC (assisted by act on behalf of the former Prime Emma Hargreaves and Stephanie Minister of Georgia and his family Thompson) acts for the Plaintiff, as beneficiaries of a Singapore Jonathan Adkin QC (assisted by Trust in Bidzina Ivanishvili v Adil Mohamedbhai) acts for the Credit Suisse Trust. Claims have Defendant trustees, and Richard been commenced against Credit Wilson QC and Jonathan Harris Suisse entities for losses arising QC (Hon.) (assisted by James from the mismanagement of an Weale and Charlotte Beynon) investment portfolio said to be act for another Defendant, Tony worth over US$1bn. In July 2020 Wang, in Wong v Grand View the Singapore Court of Appeal Private Trust Company Ltd & dismissed Credit Suisse Trust’s Ors, proceedings in Bermuda jurisdiction challenge, bringing an concerning very substantial end to a long-running jurisdiction purpose trusts. In 2020, the battle. Bermuda Supreme Court handed down decisions on Jonathan Adkin QC and Charlotte issues including: (i) the iniquity Beynon act for the fourth exception to legal professional defendant and Philip Marshall privilege ([2020] SC (Bda) 33 QC and Simon Hattan for the fifth Com, 5 August 2020); (ii) purging defendant in Public Institution for contempt for breach of the implied Social Security of Kuwait v Al- undertaking ([2020] SC (Bda) Rajaan and Ors, one of the largest 52 Civ, 10 December 2020); and fraud claims ever heard in the (iii) specific discovery based Commercial Court. PIFSS alleges on “practical control” and joint that the defendants are liable for interest privilege ([2020] SC over US$800m as a result of a (Bda) 57 Com, 30 December large-scale fraud perpetrated by 2020). The trial of the case is its former director general, Mr listed to be heard in 2021 for Al-Rajaan, in conjunction with the several months and is thought to other defendants. The Serle Court be the largest case in Bermuda contingent recently successfully and one of the largest ever trust challenged the jurisdiction of the disputes anywhere in the common English Court to hear the claims law world. against their clients, with the Court directing that the claims should be heard in Switzerland, a decision
Constance McDonnell QC acts Servier Laboratories Ltd [2020] 3 for the claimants in the first-ever WLR 1207, where it was held that derivative claim in Bermuda by the the EU law principle of absolute beneficiaries of an estate. res judicata arising from decisions of the European Courts annulling David Drake appeared for the acts of EU institutions could successful respondents in not be applied in a legal context the Supreme Court hearing in detached from the annulling Secretary of State for Health v judgment. ...we remain a leading set for Civil Fraud Philip Marshall QC and Oliver the claimant in Kelly v Baker & Jones continue to represent Braid, a commercial court claim Emmerson International for damages for fraudulent Corporation and several other misrepresentation and/or breach defendants and claimants by of fiduciary duty leading to the way of counterclaim and ancillary sale of a group of companies at an claim in proceedings in the BVI undervalue of over £110m. in a dispute worth circa US$1bn between two prominent Russian Lance Ashworth QC acts for the businessmen and associated claimant in Grove Park Properties parties concerning a joint venture v Royal Bank of Scotland, which in relation to power generation is due for a 10-day Commercial and distribution assets in Russia Court trial in January 2021, (Renova Industries Ltd & Ors in which it is alleged that the v Emmerson International defendant bank fraudulently Corporation & Ors). The amended a loan agreement to proceedings involve contractual halve the term of the loan. claims and claims for breach of trust and dishonest assistance, Lance Ashworth QC and Matthew deceit, conspiracy to injure and Morrison are acting for the other economic torts. There claimants in Wellcourt Investment were numerous interlocutory Corp v Propfurn Ltd, a claim in hearings and appeals in 2020, connection with a £100m property including a successful appeal portfolio in London, owned by BVI by Emmerson against the lower and Liberian companies. They court’s decision to set aside have so far successfully obtained certain amendments to its recovery of all monies held by the claims (BVIHCMAP 2019/0017), former agents of the claimants. applications made by Emmerson for anti-suit injunctions in relation John Machell QC acts for the to proceedings brought in Russia claimants in Circumference v (currently subject to appeal) and Martin in which the Claimants Cyprus, and an application by the claim an entitlement to rescind Renova parties for an order that a share purchase agreement for Emmerson be required to share fraudulent misrepresentation. legal representation with certain other parties notwithstanding Hugh Norbury QC has been that there is a conflict of interests involved in the English leg of between them. Judgment of China Metals v Chun, a large the ECCA is also pending on international fraud case relating Emmerson’s appeal against the to the alleged misappropriation lower court’s decision to impose of assets in China / Hong Kong. a confidentiality club in relation Hugh is acting for the daughters to disclosure ordered to be given of the alleged fraudster in relation ancillary to a freezing injunction to a proprietary injunction over obtained by Emmerson, which will valuable assets that they hold in be the first appellate decision on London. the subject in the BVI. 06 Lance Ashworth QC acts for
Hugh Norbury QC is instructed on behalf of corporate and individual trustee and director defendants in Ballacorey What v Brown and Ors, a fraud claim issued in the Isle inhouse counsel. A seventeen- of Man arising out of a relationship day trial in the Chancery Division is between investment managers in due to commence in June 2021. the GEM financial management business. Matthew Morrison acts for the defendants to proceedings Jonathan Adkin QC and Adil concerning the ownership and Mohamedbhai acted for the operation of Globcon Limited, successful defendants in an English company which Magdeev v Tsvetkov & Ors, a was the ultimate owner of a high-profile piece of civil fraud and shopping centre in Ukraine. commercial litigation involving The proceedings raise issues various Russian individuals concerning the extent to who had invested in a jewellery which criminal proceedings in business in the UAE and Cyprus. Turkey and Ukraine concerning The trial lasted three weeks. fraudulent attempts to Cockerill J’s judgment ([2020] misappropriate the shopping EWHC 887 (Comm)) contains centre may be relied upon by the a detailed analysis of the law on defendants in proceedings in the foreign illegality. Chancery Division. In Equity Real Estate (Bracknell) In Ward v Savill [2020] EWHC Ltd & Ors v Capstan Capital 1534 (Ch), James Mather acted Partners LLP & Ors, Justin Higgo for the successful defendant in QC and Stephanie Thompson the determination of a preliminary are representing five SPVs who issue on whether declarations are the apparent victims of a obtained in earlier proceedings substantial property investment to which the defendant was not fraud. They have so far obtained a party that property was held extensive disclosure from third on constructive trust for the parties under the Bankers Trust, claimants could be relied on in Norwich Pharmacal and pre- future proceedings for purposes action disclosure jurisdictions. of asserting a tracing or following claim against her. The case is due In Federal Republic of Nigeria v to be heard by the Court of Appeal Tibit, Timothy Collingwood QC in March 2021. acts for the defendant company in an action in the BVI brought In Russell v Cartwright [2020] on behalf of the Government of EWHC 41 (Ch), Dan McCourt Nigeria to recover funds which it Fritz and Stephanie Thompson is claimed were appropriated by represented three defendants in corrupt former officials and used the trial of a claim for fraudulent to purchase an executive jet. non-disclosure and unlawful means conspiracy brought by Matthew Morrison acts for Sheikh their former business partner. Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber and a They were wholly successful at number of companies within the trial, with the Court finding that MBI Hotel Group in proceedings the parties did not owe fiduciary alleging breaches of fiduciary duties or duties of disclosure and duty, fraudulent misrepresentation that the defendants had been and an unlawful means conspiracy honest in their dealings with the in relation to loans which are said claimant. The defendants were to have been orchestrated by and entitled to their costs on the for the benefit of MBI’s former indemnity basis.
...we are at the forefront of Commercial Litigation in London and globally Lance Ashworth QC and Dan Shipyard v Reignwood McCourt Fritz acted for the International Investment (Group) successful Respondents in Company Ltd [2020] EWHC the Court of Appeal in Taylor 803 (Comm). She is also acting v Van Dutch Marine Holding for the shipowner in its 2021 [2020] EWCA Civ 353, in a LMAA arbitration claim under the claim concerning agents for shipbuilding contract. undisclosed principals. They are now instructed for the defendants In PPRS v Tecar Justin Higgo in Taylor v Khodabaksh in which QC represents the defendant it is claimed that the original in multiple claims for breach of decision in Taylor v Van Dutch warranty arising out of the sale of Marine Holding was obtained by a Romanian paper business. fraud. That will come on for trial in 2022. Julian Burling advised the PRA on the FSMA Part VII transfer to Hugh Norbury QC has been Lloyd’s Insurance Company S.A., working on the Bermudian Brussels, of the EEA situs risk element of the international battle cover in all policies written in the waged by the private equity firm Lloyd’s market from 1993 to 2018. Apollo and its subsidiary Athene against their former partner / David Drake acted for the employees who have set up a successful defendants in competitive business (Athene v SPI North Ltd v Swiss Post Siddiqui, Cernich & Caldera). International (UK) Ltd [2020] EWHC 3268 (Ch), where the Hugh Norbury QC was instructed court had to consider the practical in Gens v Goldenberg, in which a limits to the permission, frequently battle between Russian investors given to respondents to an in a Russian software business amendment application, to make was briefly before the English High “consequential” amendments to Court; the case was compromised their own responsive statement before the interesting issue of of case. jurisdiction was resolved. Simon Hattan is acting for RSA Hugh Norbury QC and Mark plc in defence of claims brought Wraith represented Charles by a group of over 50 institutional Saatchi and relevant corporate claimants under section 90A entities in a successful attempt of the Financial Services and to obtain permission to pursue Markets Act 2000. The claimants derivative proceedings against allege that Annual Reports his former senior employee, Rahul and other published financial Gajjar and in related litigation. The information contained untrue underlying dispute related to the or misleading statements, in storage and transportation of Mr particular about accounting Saatchi’s fabulous collection of irregularities in the company’s Irish art. subsidiary, and that as a result they suffered significant losses on Zoe O’Sullivan QC acted for their holdings of RSA shares. the successful defendant in a US$170m guarantee claim In The Union Castle Steamship brought by the Shanghai Shipyard, Company Ltd v HMRC [2020] in which Robin Knowles J held EWCA Civ 547 a case concerning that the guarantee given by it to the use of derivative contract rules the Shipyard in respect of the to engineer tax deductible losses final instalment of a shipbuilding exceeding £100m, the Court of contract was not a performance bond but gave rise only to 08 secondary liability: Shanghai
Appeal clarified the meaning of of Appeal gave guidance on ‘loss’ and ‘arising from’ and the the inter-relationship between nature of the ‘fairly represents’ principles of agency law and test in that context. The earlier contractual construction in order decision of the Upper Tribunal to determine when a disclosed also extended the application of principal can intervene in, and transfer pricing rules to certain assert rights under, a contract. shareholder transactions (bonus James acts in related proceedings share issues). Ruth Jordan acted in Jersey which have been listed for HMRC. for trial in March 2021. Matthew Morrison successfully James Weale acted in resisted an application to set committal proceedings aside an order permitting service against Oleg Deripaska. The out of the jurisdiction on Dubai judgment of Andrew Baker J Islamic Bank (DIB) in proceedings [2020] EWHC 1978 (Comm) before the Commercial Court established that an applicant which seek mandatory injunctive in committal proceedings relief aimed at securing an end to is under a duty to present a Mr Ridley’s ongoing imprisonment contempt dispassionately and in Dubai ([2020] EWHC 1213 in the public interest and that (Comm)). Mr Ridley was an application may be abusive imprisoned under Dubai’s Law if the subjective motive of the 37 of 2009 which allows certain applicant is inconsistent with that types of judgment creditors to duty. Permission to appeal the apply for the imprisonment of judgment has been granted by debtors for up to twenty years. Mr the Court of Appeal and James is Ridley claims that DIB’s ability to instructed in the appeal listed to seek an order under Law 37 was be heard in October 2021. compromised by a settlement agreement governed by English Adil Mohamedbhai is advising law with an exclusive jurisdiction (unled) a potential defendant who clause in favour of England. is being threatened to be sued Matthew also successfully for professional negligence in the opposed DIB’s attempts to obtain context of a very high-profile fraud an order allowing the costs which has generated substantial awarded to Mr Ridley to be set off global press coverage. If the case against monies said to be due to proceeds, it is likely to be one of DIB under an earlier Commercial the most high-value professional Court judgment: [2020] EWHC negligence claims ever brought 2088 (Comm). in an English court (in excess of US$1 billion). In Filatona Trading Ltd v Navigator Equities Ltd [2020] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 418, James Weale acted for the successful respondent before the Court of Appeal. The Court
In Khalifeh v Blom Bank, Zahler the relationship between the Bryan is acting for the claimant debtor and the creditor and raise who seeks the return of monies novel issues, some of which held in a Lebanese bank account are untested in the courts. The and, in a high-profile decision Financial Conduct Authority earlier this year, successfully estimates that Plevin pay-outs resisted the Lebanese bank’s could exceed £33bn. jurisdiction challenge by establishing that the claimant was Stephanie Wickenden acted as a consumer for the purposes of sole counsel for the successful the European rules of jurisdiction appellants in the Court of Appeal ([2020] EWHC 2427(QB)). in Glencairn IP Holdings Ltd & Anor v Product Specialities Inc In Satfinance Investment Ltd v & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 609 Inigo Philbrick [2020] EWHC which created new precedent 1261 (Ch), Zahler Bryan acted in respect of solicitors’ conflicts. for Athena Art Finance Corp, The Appellants/Defendants’ a New York based company solicitors previously acted for specialising in providing finance another defendant in a case secured on works of art, in brought by the same claimant proceedings arising from an where the facts had some overlap, alleged fraud concerning a Jean- and which was resolved by a Michel Basquiat. Permission for confidential mediation. The Court Satfinance to serve Athena out of found that the principles to be the jurisdiction was successfully applied were not the same as set aside as there was no real those in former clients, but that issue to be tried and on forum there was a potential for a conflict conveniens grounds. of duties owing to the confidential information received through the Professor Suzanne Rab is previous mediation. On the facts, advising on a number of potential the solicitors had not breached claims against leading UK banks any duty as they had implemented and lenders which represent an appropriate information barrier. the ‘second wave’ of payment protection insurance (PPI) Sophia Hurst represented the litigation. The claims arise out of Claimants in Toucan Energy the Supreme Court’s judgment Holdings Ltd v Wirsol Energy in the Plevin case of 2014 which Ltd in a five-week trial in the allowed the claimant to claim Commercial Court before the full amount of undisclosed Henshaw J. The US$60m dispute commission on a PPI policy. Unlike related to the sale, construction claims for mis-sold PPI these and financing of 19 solar farms in claims focus on the unfairness in the UK. Judgment is awaited. ...we continue to have considerable expertise in domestic and offshore trusts, probate and private client matters Philip Jones QC has been the discharge of a world-wide acting in the BVI in numerous freezing injunction and, in par- applications in the Skobelev case ticular, whether the judge at first in which a Russian national has instance was right to discharge sought to recover money and the injunction on the basis of a lack assets stolen from him by a former of risk of dissipation. Judgment is employee and her husband. awaited. John Machell QC appeared for John Machell QC and Dan the appellant before the East- McCourt Fritz act for one of the ern Caribbean Court of Appeal (BVI) in July in Green Elite v Fang 10 Ankong. The appeal concerned
respondents to an appeal in St Dakis Hagen QC appeared for the Johns Trust Company (PUT) first defendant in Geneva Trust Ltd v Medlands (PTC) Ltd. The Company (GTC) SA v IDF & Anr appeal concerned various orders (21/12/2020) FSD 248 OF 2017 made by the Court exercising its (IKJ) in her successful application supervisory jurisdiction in relation for a stay of a claim in the Cayman to trusts. The appeal was heard by Islands seeking declarations as the Bermudian Court of Appeal in to the validity of a Cayman Islands January 2020. trust which trust was already being impugned by her in ongoing In Sofer v SwissIndependent litigation in Italy. The application Trustees SA [2020] EWCA was met in part by the argument Civ 699, Richard Wilson QC that the Cayman court had an and James Weale acted for the exclusive statutory jurisdiction respondent in an appeal against to determine such matters under an order striking out the claimant’s section 90 of the Cayman Trusts pleading on the basis that it did Law (which, it was said, in that not properly particularise a claim context abrogated the power in fraud. The Court of Appeal to stay on grounds of forum non gave important guidance on the conveniens); the court noted that pleading requirements of fraud in such had been the orthodox view the context of a dispute against a historically based on authorities professional trustee. stretching back 20 years. However, having conducted a full In Cowan v Foreman, Richard survey of the case law, Kawaley J Wilson QC and Gregor Hogan found that on analysis no authority acted for the trustee-executors was binding or persuasive as to in this high-profile Inheritance the presence of such a statutory (Provision for Family and exclusive jurisdiction, nor was Dependants) Act 1975 litigation, such the proper reading of the which was brought to a successful statute, and on the facts ordered settlement in Spring 2020. a stay of the Cayman claim. The case is also important more Constance McDonnell QC is widely for its commentary on the acting for the respondent in the scope of jurisdiction clauses in important case of Re H, in which trust instruments in the wake of the Court of Appeal will consider Crociani. in June 2021 whether a CFA success fee can be recoverable Dakis Hagen QC and Emma as part of an award under the 1975 Hargreaves continue to act for Act. the adult children of a late Russian businessman in Re Scherbakov, Constance McDonnell QC deceased, a cross border dispute successfully resisted the concerning the succession to adjournment of a trial sought for his very substantial worldwide Covid-related reasons in Lucas estate and related proceedings v Gatward [2020] EWHC 3040 concerning the beneficial (Ch). The widely reported case ownership of very valuable about ownership of a family home shares in a BVI company. Dakis settled shortly before the trial due and Emma recently succeeded to commence in November 2020. in obtaining an order for joint case management of the two Constance McDonnell QC acted English claims, notwithstanding for minor beneficiaries in QR v ST, opposition from the claimants. an application to vary trusts so Giles Richardson acts for that illegitimate children could be the deceased’s former wife included as beneficiaries. and Richard Wilson QC and Oliver Jones act for the interim Constance McDonnell QC administrators. appeared in Glover v Barker [2020] EWCA Civ 1112 in which Ruth Jordan is acting for the the Court of Appeal considered applicants in a judicial review for the first time the extent of the liability of a litigation friend for legal 12 costs.
challenge to a controversial order over a property over a exploratory offshore oil drilling property valued at £9m, which project in the Bahamas by formed the subject matter Bahamas Petroleum Company of a 3-day trial before Edis J plc. in July 2020 in Cobussen v Akbar [2020] EWHC 2805 James Weale acted for the (QB). Notwithstanding that the successful applicant in a property was held by a company, committal application against whose shares were held within the managing partner of an a discretionary trust, the Court international law firm in Schwartz found that the property was v VGV (UK) Ltd, Vivanco and held on resulting trust for the Ors [2020] EWHC 2227 (Ch). judgment debtor, Ghouse Akbar. Following a 5-day trial, Roth J Following a successful application found that Clemente Vivanco for wide-ranging disclosure in had been complicit in forging the same proceedings, Edis J trust documents and, in breach gave guidance as to the role of of a court order, had failed to solicitors in ensuring compliance produce an original electronic with disclosure obligations [2020] version of one such document. At EWHC 476 (QB). a subsequent sentencing hearing, the Court imposed an immediate In Z v Z, Sophie Holcombe custodial sentence of 4 months and Gregor Hogan act for the [2020] EWHC 3500 (Ch). trustees of a Jersey trust holding UK residential property in the James Weale acted for the context of English matrimonial successful claimant in a proceedings. dispute over the ownership of company which held a valuable Adil Mohamedbhai acted as an Chelsea property in Moutreuil expert in Swiss proceedings v Andreewitch [2020] EWHC brought by a former trustee in 2068 (Fam). Following a 4-day relation to an English trust holding trial, Cobb J held that the transfer valuable assets worth many of shares by Mr Andreewitch to millions of dollars. Adil opined his partner in order to insulate the on complex issues concerning property against creditors took the proper characterisation of effect as an outright gift. In related a claim for remuneration and committal proceedings, which reimbursement of expenses by also formed the subject of hearing former trustees. in the Court of Appeal [2020] 4 W.L.R. 54, James succeeded In B v B, Emma Hargreaves and in an application to commit Mr Gregor Hogan act for the wife in Andreewitch for contempt of divorce proceedings involving court [2020] 2 F.L.R. 812 for Portuguese property held in a which he received a suspended Cypriot trust. The case involves sentence of 6 months [2020] complex questions of jurisdiction EWHC 2068 (Fam). and trusts law, and is expected to be one of the first decisions James Weale acted for the considering the Privy Council’s successful claimant in an decision in Webb v Webb. application for a final charging Judgment is expected in early 2021. ...we continue to be instructed in major company, insolvency and partnership disputes Dominic Dowley QC, Richard restructuring of a substantial Wilson QC and Zahler Bryan group of English trusts, in a case acted for the trustee in PTNZ involving proceedings before the v AS, a Public Trustee v Cooper English and Jersey courts. application concerning the
Philip Marshall QC and Simon 2021 the Court of Appeal will Hattan represent the US Trustee consider the appeal against the in Bankruptcy of Sean Dunne, a refusal of the first instance judge well-known Irish businessman to strike out the petition. and property developer, who filed for bankruptcy in the US in Lance Ashworth QC and Zahler 2013 and was adjudged bankrupt Bryan have been acting for the in the Republic of Ireland the claimant in the case of de Silva v same year. The US bankruptcy Lucas & Ribeiro, a claim in respect was recognised by the English of the ownership of an Estonian Court following an application holding company, which (through by the Trustee in March 2020. Estonian and Portuguese The Court subsequently granted subsidiaries) owns a very applications for both Mr Dunne substantial property development and his ex-wife to produce in Lisbon, Portugal. documents relating to various of their financial dealings and In Nimat Halal Food Ltd v Patel made an order for Mr Dunne to be [2020] EWHC 734 (Ch), Zoe examined under section 366 of O’Sullivan QC appeared for the the Insolvency Act 1986. creditor in an insolvency case in which Chief ICC Judge Briggs Philip Jones QC was successful gave guidance on the personal in the Privy Council in Ocean liability of an administrator to Sino, a case which involved a pay costs following a creditor’s claim by one joint owner of a BVI successful appeal against the company to wind it up on the just rejection of its proof of debt. and equitable ground. He had previously acted at the original In Re Global-IP Cayman, Daniel trial and before the BVI Court of Lightman QC, representing the Appeal. majority shareholder in the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, Lance Ashworth QC is acting for successfully argued before two sets of Joint Administrators Parker J that (i) the case was an of 2 electricity suppliers, each of exception to the usual rule that which is facing claims from Ofgem the petitioning creditor should be and from Suppliers of Last Resort, awarded its costs of a winding- which claims are for many millions up petition (unrep, 21 July 2020) of pounds and will make very and (ii) the majority shareholder’s substantial impact on the returns appointees to the company’s available for other creditors. The board had not been removed Court will have to determine these from office because on a proper claims in 2021. interpretation of the company’s articles the relevant board Lance Ashworth QC and meeting had been inquorate Dan McCourt Fritz acted for (unrep, 31 December 2020). the successful Appellants in Loveridge v Loveridge [2020] In Christoforou v Christoforou EWCA Civ 1104 overturning [2020] 1196 EWHC (Ch), Daniel injunctions in an unfair prejudice Lightman QC and Stephanie petition and in partnership Thompson represented the proceedings which had granted claimant, who claimed that a the running of the companies London property was held on trust and partnerships to a minority for him pursuant to a common shareholder and partner. The intention constructive trust, in a Court of Appeal effectively put successful and novel application the majority back in charge. Both to strike out allegations of the petition and the partnership dishonesty, fraud, and illegality proceedings continue and will from the defendants’ Amended come on for trial in 2022. Defence and to exclude those allegations from consideration Lance Ashworth QC and Dan and cross-examination at trial, on McCourt Fritz continue to act for the company and shareholders in The Hut Group, in which in early 14
the grounds that they amounted counsel for the Official Receiver to similar fact evidence which was in Re Keeping Kids Company; of peripheral value to determining Official Receiver v Atkinson, the the claim and would have disqualification proceedings increased the cost (and risked arising from the collapse of the adjournment) of the trial. charity Kids Company. These are believed to be the first ever In Trafalgar v Hadley & Ors proceedings for disqualification Justin Higgo QC and Jamie of charity trustees as company Randall continue to represent directors and they raise questions the liquidator of Trafalgar in about the standard to be applied multi-party proceedings in the to unpaid trustee directors, Chancery Division to recover whether a remunerated charity funds misappropriated from a CEO can or ought to be classified Cayman Islands segregated as a de facto company director, portfolio by its fiduciaries. and what degree of latitude the trustee directors have in relation In Brown v MML Capital, Timothy to the pursuit of charitable objects Collingwood QC acted for the when the company is of doubtful petitioners in an unfair prejudice solvency. petition in which he succeeded in obtaining an injunction to restrain Matthew Morrison and Gregor the continuation of disciplinary Hogan act for Haz International proceedings concerning disputed Limited in connection with allegations of misconduct pending misfeasance proceedings resolution of the Petition ([2020] alleging the diversion of business EWHC 23 (Ch)). opportunities and other wrongs by a former director and shareholder. In Re: H Limited, Timothy These have been consolidated Collingwood QC acts for majority with a just and equitable winding shareholders in BVI proceedings up/unfair prejudice petition involving allegations against them presented by the defendant of unfairly prejudicial conduct, director/shareholder. The where the Court has had to evidential stage of the trial address the effect on the claim (including the cross-examination against the shareholders of an of three Turkish witnesses via a arbitration agreement in the translator) took place remotely company’s articles of association. over ten days in the Insolvency and Companies Court during In Medical Imaging Partners January 2021. Closings will be v St Joseph’s Independent presented in March 2021. Hospital, the question arose as to whether an MRI machine and James Mather acted for the Joint other medical equipment subject Administrators of an insolvent to chattel leases had become FCA-regulated international annexed to land owned by a payment services provider in Re company in administration, so that Supercapital Ltd [2020] EWHC title to the equipment passed to 1865 (Ch). This involved the first the purchasers of the business application to seek a court’s when the company’s assets approval for a distribution plan were sold by the administrators. under the Payment Services Thomas Braithwaite acted for the Regulations 2017, on the basis of purchasers. statutory trust principles applied in the context of other financial Gareth Tilley acted as junior services regulations. ...we have covered a broad range of Property and Charities work In Wickers v Humbles, Philip in a dispute arising from the Jones QC and Gregor Hogan impact of the global financial continue to act for the directors of crisis on a super-prime property a property development company development in London. The case
is expected to proceed to a six- then available for the purpose, the week trial in the Isle of Man in late fund was sufficient to discharge 2021 or 2022. the National Debt. The fund was then to be transferred to the In Children’s Investment Fund National Debt Commissioners to Foundation (UK) v Attorney be applied by them in reduction General [2020] UKSC 33, the of the National Debt. The Fund Claimant charitable company is now worth about £0.5 billion. had agreed to make a grant of Zacaroli J held that there was a US$360m to another English valid charitable trust and that the charity conditionally on the court had jurisdiction to order a approval of the court. The cy-pres scheme. He adjourned payment of the grant required the question of what (if any) the approval of the members scheme to order. under section 217 Companies Act 2006. The Supreme Court In Dunmoore (West London) Ltd v held that the members owed Vanessa Donegan [2020] (Upper fiduciary duties and that the court Tribunal Lands Chamber), Andrew had an exceptional jurisdiction Bruce acted for the Objector to order them how to vote, even on an application to modify a if they had not and were not restrictive covenant under s.84(1) threatening to vote in breach (aa) of the Law of Property Act of duty. The majority of the 1925. The Applicants were Supreme Court also held that by constructing an industrial park on reason of the High Court having, agricultural land near Billingshurst, on the directors’ surrender of Sussex and sought to modify discretion, held that it was in a covenant which prevented the best interests of the charity any building on a buffer zone for the grant to be paid; the of 200’ from the boundary of members, who were parties to the Objector’s (extensive and that decision were bound by it valuable) home. The application and, absent a substantial change was settled the last working day in circumstances were bound to before the Upper Tribunal hearing vote in favour of it, even if, but for on commercial terms. the judicial decision, they could reasonably have voted against In Kelleher v Castlebourne Homes it. Will Henderson acted for the (Rock) Ltd [2020] (High Court, charitable company. Bodmin District Registry) Andrew Bruce represented In Attorney General v Zedra the Defendant developers in a Fiduciary Services (UK) Ltd dispute about the width of a strip [2020] EWHC 2988 (Ch), of land and easement at a site in Will Henderson acted for the Trebetherick, Cornwall. The trial Attorney General. This involved took place over a week entirely ‘The National Fund’ which was remotely in Summer 2020 and settled with £500,000 of cash involved detailed consideration and securities in 1928 on trust to of historic conveyances, accumulate income and profits numerous plans and various aerial until the date fixed by the trustee photographs, together with as being the date when, either alone or together with other funds 16
contested expert surveying from the Charity Commission’s evidence. HHJ Carr’s judgment decision to disqualify him paid tribute to the quality of the as a charity trustee. Jonathan submissions. succeeded in reducing the period of his disqualification from 15 to 7.5 Thomas Braithwaite, acting for the years. The judgment of the FTT Crown Estate Commissioners, provides the most in-depth legal successfully defeated an adverse analysis yet of the Commission’s claim to part of the North Norfolk relatively new disqualification coast. The case addressed power. the principles of accretion and avulsion, and the presumption of Amy Proferes acts for the First Crown ownership of the foreshore and Second Defendants in (Bett & Gethin v Crown Estate Toner v Telford Homes & Ors, a (FTT, REF/2017/0591)). claim regarding a flat purchased off-plan. The claimant seeks Jonathan Fowles has been rescission, damages and other acting for London Borough of remedies against 6 defendants Merton against Nuffield Health including the developer, the in a dispute about the charitable property manager and the exemption from non-domestic current freeholder, on the basis rates. The issues in the case are of misrepresentation, breach of potentially wide significance for of contract, fraud, negligence charities. Nuffield succeeded in and harassment. The case their claim at first instance ([2020] raises questions which will be EWHC 259 (Ch), but Merton of importance to developers obtained permission to appeal. selling properties off plan as to The case was heard by the Court representations made in sales of Appeal in January 2021 and models and brochures, as well as judgment is awaited. how (and whether) developers can protect themselves from such Jonathan Fowles acted for claims by means of disclaimers Dr Zakir Naik, a renowned and/or contractual terms. international speaker and Judgment is currently awaited on author of books on Islam and applications by the First to Fourth comparative religion, in his appeal Defendants seeking summary judgment and/or strike out of the claim. ...our Intellectual Property practice has remained as active as ever In 2020 Michael Edenborough on late filing of TM8s [2020] FSR QC has been instructed in relation 33), and the EU IPO (e.g. an appeal to 4 new trade mark appeals to the to the General Court on the General Court, Luxembourg, and proper construction of potentially taken to trial a case alleging that ambiguous specifications for Amazon is involved in importing EUTMs [2020] ETMR 7). counterfeit goods. In Lunar Holdings Ltd v Michael Edenborough QC has Lunar Caravans Ltd, Thomas also dealt with some interesting Braithwaite blended IP and trade mark cases, e.g. a bottle company law when he appeared in the shape of a human skull in the IPEC for defendants (Skullduggery Rum Ltd v accused of breach of a trade mark Globefill Inc [2020] ETMR 9), licence. A summary judgment and the ‘Babybel’ red cheese application was defeated on mark ([2020] Bus LR 514). These the grounds that the claimant decisions and other decisions arguably did not have good title to continued developing the law on the trade mark, having acquired it procedure in both the UK IPO (e.g. by way of an unlawful return of
capital and disguised distribution Stephanie Wickenden continues by a company to its shareholder. to act for easyGroup in a number of matters, including in a disputed Stephanie Wickenden acted as jurisdiction application in case sole counsel in a dispute relating against Colombian airline “Easy to trade mark and design rights Fly” which set new guidance for in the Glencairn IP Holdings Ltd assessing whether trade mark & Anor v Product Specialities. acts are in the jurisdiction. This included successfully representing the Defendant in the Stephanie Wickenden has acted Court of Appeal in respect of an for Standard International hotels application brought to restrain the regarding their EU trade mark, and Defendants’ solicitors from acting will continue to act in an upcoming owing to an alleged conflict. She appeal before the General Court also was involved in proceedings led by Michael Edenborough QC. going to the validity of the trade marks at the European IPO. ...and worked on a range of EU, Competition and Regulatory cases Professor Suzanne Rab is procedure subject to the advising on EU and UK data requirements of the Public protection and privacy matters Contracts Regulations 2015 (SI under the General Data 2015/102) (PCR 2015) and related Protection Regulation and the duties arising under EU law. The Data Protection Act 2018. Her case raised novel issues of law representations straddle claims including consideration of when involving data breach, misuse of judicial review claims can be personal information and human brought where there is a statutory rights. Many of the legal issues procedure. raised have not been tested in the courts (e.g. data controller Suzanne is also advising energy classification, measure of market regulator Ofgem on damages). Her representations an ongoing basis on a range include proceedings before the of competition and regulatory Information Commissioner’s matters. This involves providing Office (ICO) and in litigation legal support to the regulator’s seeking orders for compliance in-house legal team on significant with data protection legislation projects, providing strategic, risk- and damages. based advice up to board level on a regular basis across these areas Suzanne also represented and advising Ofgem lawyers and Riverside Truck Rental in parallel policy officials. proceedings in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) and the Administrative Court for judicial review. The claim raised EU and procurement law questions arising out of the 18 conduct of a public procurement
...we are regularly instructed overseas in the Dubai International Financial Centre Rupert Reed QC and James Zoe O’Sullivan QC is acting for Weale act for the Claimant Dr Michael Fakih in his DIFC bank in a US$30m fraud claim fraud claim against NMC Health against various defendants in plc, which collapsed in early proceedings in the DIFC in SBM 2020 following the revelation of Bank (Mauritius) Ltd v Renish widescale fraud by the short seller Petroleum FZE (CFI 054/2018). Muddy Waters. Zoe O’Sullivan QC Having successfully obtained and Adrian de Froment are also summary judgment against the acting for Barclays Bank in the first two defendants, the trial DIFC Court in a guarantee claim against the third defendant has against Dr BR Shetty, the founder been listed in December 2021. of the NMC Health Group. A committal application against the first two defendants has been In Basin v Rouge CFI 057/2018, listed for January 2021. James Weale appeared in the last in-person hearing in the DIFC Rupert Reed QC and Gregor Court before lockdown. Following Hogan act for the Sarjah Elecricity a trial, James obtained judgment and Water Authority in FAL Oil for the claimant in a claim Company Ltd v Sarjah Electricity under a guarantee agreement: and Water Authority. The case [2018] CFI 057. The Court involves the challenging of the gave guidance on the extent to recognition and enforcement which variations to underlying in the DIFC of a Sarjah court obligations affect the validity of judgment on the basis of inter- an associated guarantee. James Emirate immunity. This is the also successfully defeated a first time the DIFC Court has jurisdiction challenge submitted considered the concepts of to the Joint Judicial Committee sovereign immunity within the (Cassation No. 9 of 2019). UAE and judgment is expected in early 2021. In Brown & Company Plc v Faber Capital (DIFC) Ltd, Rupert Reed QC and Gregor Hogan continue to act for a financial services firm defending allegations of breach of fiduciary duty arising from a sophisticated phishing attack. In Credit Europe Bank (Dubai) Ltd v. (1) NMC Trading LLC (2) NMC Healthcare LLC (3) Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty [2020] DIFC CFI 031, Rupert Reed QC and Gregor Hogan acted for the major Dutch Bank, CEBD, to obtaining a worldwide freezing order against Dr BR Shetty, founder of the troubled NMC Group. The decision also confirmed that an applicant need not demonstrate any assets of the respondent in the jurisdiction of the DIFC to obtain a worldwide freezing order. Rupert and Gregor will represent CEBD at the trial of its claim against Dr Shetty in September 2021.
... and in arbitration matters generally In Cesfin Ventures LLC v Ghaith resident entrepreneur. Al Qubaisi, Rupert Reed QC and Gregor Hogan obtained Zoe O’Sullivan QC appeared for a worldwide freezing order in the respondent at the quantum the Chancery Division against stage of a multi-million dollar a director and shareholder of a LCIA arbitration arising out UAE conglomerate in support of of the collapse of a Ukrainian New York proceedings against agricultural joint venture following him as “alter ego” of the UAE the revolution in Ukraine in 2014, holding company, alternatively in involving complex valuation setting aside fraudulent transfer issues. to himself and others of company assets to frustrate enforcement James Weale and Jamie of the award rendered in an ICC Randall act for the defendant in arbitration seated in New York. an LCIA Arbitration governed by Kuwaiti Law. The claimant In L v B [2020] DIFC ARB 014 seeks commission payment in (17 June 2020), Rupert Reed the sum of US$10m allegedly QC and Gregor Hogan obtained due in respect of substantial an order for the recognition of contracts for petroleum products. a London arbitration award, a The matter has been listed for worldwide freezing order and the determination in 2021. first notification order made by the DIFC Court against a UAE 20
6 New Square Lincoln’s Inn London WC2A 3QS T: +44 (0)20 7242 6105 F: +44 (0)29 7405 4004 @Serle_Court www.serlecourt.co.uk
You can also read