School Improvement Plan 2020-2021 Saint Bernard Catholic School, D370 Diocese of Evansville - Mr. Ryan Nowak, Principal Rockport, IN 47635-1447 ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
School Improvement Plan 2020-2021 Saint Bernard Catholic School, D370 Diocese of Evansville Mr. Ryan Nowak, Principal 207 N. 6th St. Rockport, IN 47635-1447 812-649-2501 Submitted: October 2, 2020
Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction 3 Description of the School 3 School’s Purpose 4 Notable Achievements and Areas of Improvement 6 Additional Information 7 Improvement Plan Stakeholder Involvement Introduction 8 Improvement Planning Process 8 Self-Assessment Introduction 10 Standard 1: Purpose and Direction 10 Standard 2: Governance and Leadership 12 Standard 3: Teaching and Assessing for Learning 15 Standard 4: Resources and Support Systems 20 Standard 5: Using Results for Continuous Improvement 23 Report Summary 26 Saint Bernard Catholic School 2018-2019 Goals Goals Summary 27 Goal #1 27 Goal #2 28 Goal #3 30 Goal #4 31 Student Performance Diagnostic Introduction 34 Student Performance Data ISTEP Pass Rates 2011 – 2018 34 Free/Reduced Lunch vs Paid Lunch Pass Rates 2016 – 2017 35 Evaluative Criteria and Rubrics 35 Report Summary 36 * Saint Bernard Catholic School and Preschool are both accredited through AdvancED. The format of this document follows the structure shown in the school’s AdvancED’s ASSIST site. 2
Executive Summary Introduction Every school has its own story to tell. The context in which teaching and learning takes place influences the processes and procedures by which the school makes decisions around curriculum, instruction, and assessment. The context also impacts the way a school stays faithful to its vision. Many factors contribute to the overall narrative such as an identification of stakeholders, a description of stakeholder engagement, the trends and issues affecting the school, and the kinds of programs and services that a school implements to support student learning. The purpose of the Executive Summary (ES) is to provide a school with an opportunity to describe in narrative form the strengths and challenges it encounters. By doing so, the public and members of the school community will have a more complete picture of how the school perceives itself and the process of self-reflection for continuous improvement. This summary is structured for the school to reflect on how it provides teaching and learning on a day to day basis. Description of the School Describe the school's size, community/communities, location, and changes it has experienced in the last three years. Include demographic information about the students, staff, and community at large. What unique features and challenges are associated with the community/communities the school serves? St. Bernard Catholic School is located in the town of Rockport, which is the seat of Spencer County in southwestern Indiana where the annual median household income is $29,319 as reported by the 2011 Census. Rockport has a population of approximately 2,300. Our students come mainly from this county. Households are located in small towns or in rural settings. Our current school enrollment is 101 students in kindergarten through eighth grade; our current preschool and prekindergarten enrollment is 22 students. The student population is 92% Caucasian, 4% Hispanic, 1% Asian, and 4% African American or mixed race. Students enrolled in the free and reduced lunch program represent 28% of our school population. St. Bernard Catholic School is accredited with AdvancED and by Indiana’s Department of Education. The staff of the K-8 school consists of eight full-time and one part-time teacher and a full-time principal. The K-8 staff also includes a part-time Title 1 instructor, three part-time teaching assistants, and a bus driver / teaching assistant. The staff of the preschool and prekindergarten consists of one part-time director, one full-time teacher who coordinates all curriculum, one part-time teacher, and two part-time aides and/or caregivers. The K-8 school and the Preschool are also provided counseling services through Catholic Services and speech services through the Exceptional Children's Co-op for Dubois, Spencer, Perry and Pike Counties. Students who have an Individualized Service Plan receive services at Rockport Elementary or South Spencer Middle School. Saint Bernard Catholic School has a very positive working relationship with South Spencer School Corporation. The organizational structure of K-8 grades is traditional self-contained classrooms. K-8 students receive religious education daily; three times weekly they have class with our part-time religion teacher; the other two days, they participate in discussion and 3
activities in their classroom. Each school day begins with Mass, a Prayer Service, Stations of the Cross, or another designated religious service. The majority of our students use the South Spencer School Corporation for transportation to and from school. Many of our students participate in South Spencer clubs, sports, and activities; and a high percentage of our students will attend South Spencer High School. The curriculum of St. Bernard meets the requirements of the State of Indiana and the Catholic Diocese of Evansville. The textbooks used are reviewed and updated regularly by the Catholic Schools Office according to the review cycle established by the State Board of Education. The listing of textbooks utilized in classrooms at St. Bernard is updated each year, submitted to the Catholic Schools Office, and kept on file in the school office. St. Bernard has a Preschool for students who are at least three years of age. It currently has two classrooms, divided primarily by age group, offering a preschool class and a pre-kindergarten class. The Preschool is also accredited through AdvancED (spring 2017) and has achieved a Level 4 rating with Paths to Quality. Before school care and after school care is available for all preschool through eighth grade students. St. Bernard Catholic School has embraced the Indiana School Choice Scholarship Program in our school. Approximately 75% of our K-8 students receive a School Choice Scholarship, an SGO scholarship, and/or some other type of financial aid that covers the majority, if not all, of their tuition and fees. Our Catholic School is unique in that only 67% of our students are Catholic. One challenge that we face is that we compete with two very strong public school systems: South Spencer School Corporation and North Spencer School Corporation. Our preschool program competes locally with two public school preschool programs and a Head Start program. We compete with two middle schools and six elementary schools. As of 2017, two of those schools are "A" schools, 1 is a "B" and 1 is a "C." St. Bernard has consistently been rated as an “A” school by Indiana’s Department of Education; however, the school received a “B” rating in September 2018 due to a drop in state assessment scores. School's Purpose Provide the school's purpose statement and ancillary content such as mission, vision, values, and/or beliefs. Describe how the school embodies its purpose through its program offerings and expectations for students. Saint Bernard Catholic School's mission is to educate the whole child to serve the world as a responsible Christian. This mission has been adopted by the Preschool as well. We believe that every child is unique and valuable because all life comes from God. Educating the whole child means recognizing that each child is unique spiritually, intellectually, emotionally, socially, and physically. The professional staff, in cooperation with parents and others in the community, provides a safe Christian environment in which students can become lifelong learners who are prepared to cope with today's changing world and be responsible, contributing members of a global society. The purpose of Saint Bernard Preschool is to provide a safe and loving learning experience in a Christian environment. We believe that by nurturing children's creativity and natural curiosity that we can foster a 4
love for learning and help prepare children to become future leaders of our communities. We are committed to providing a well- rounded curriculum, and we are dedicated to respecting and empowering children. Saint Bernard Preschool is a Paths to Quality Level 4 program. Over the past three school years, we have begun to build a reputation for academic excellence in our preschool and prekindergarten. Our prekindergarten class from 2015-16 school year achieved high scores on the Lollipop test, relative to the previous classes. This year's prekindergarten class is achieving academic benchmarks at an even quicker rate. We try to ensure that the learning process is age appropriate and fun. We observe the students to identify those who need additional help or those who are ready for greater challenges, and we tailor our instruction to each child's learning needs. Saint Bernard Catholic School exists as a part of St. Bernard Church's educational mission to proclaim the Good News, to build community, and to orient all toward Christian service. This mission seeks to create a lively faith community through relationships among students, parents, staff, and faculty. School administrators and staff believe that students in our rapidly changing society must be formed in faith community experiences, which involve the home, school, and local parish community. Notable Achievements and Areas of Improvement Describe the school's notable achievements and areas of improvement in the last three years. Additionally, describe areas for improvement that the school is striving to achieve in the next three years. Among the biggest achievements and improvements in the last three years would be the structure of the school environment, the raising of expectations, and the accountability of teachers and students. These changes took place as the result of a change in administration and the creation of a School Improvement Team (SIT). SIT is composed of half the faculty and meets monthly to review school documents such as the Strategic Plan, the School Improvement Plan, and the Health and Wellness Plan. The faculty’s having more of a voice has shown a change from the previous culture of the school environment. Over the past four years, teachers have increased their focus on data and thus have used data to drive their instruction leading to an increase of student achievement. Teachers have received professional Development on how to use data from Renaissance Star Reading and Math assessments. They also realize the importance of differentiating their instruction to meet the individual needs of students (as shown by formative and summative assessment data). The ability to differentiate is greater at a school like St. Bernard due to the average class size of 12 students. Another notable achievement is the increase in importance of time spent teaching. Teachers are aware of the importance of time that students spend working, thinking, learning, and doing. To increase student learning and achievement, increase the amount of time the student is working. We have also made the discovery of how a few minutes wasted here and there throughout the day can really add up to days of missed opportunities. In for Spring 2018 testing, 71.2% of Saint Bernard students passed language arts portion of the ISTEP+ state assessment, and 66.2% of students passed the math portion. Another notable achievement is an increase in technology over the last four years. All of our middle 5
school students have a laptop that they use daily in the classroom. By the end of the 2018-19 school year, all students in grades 3-8 will have access to a laptop. Our computer lab consists of twenty working computers. Also, since ISTEP+ 2015, all 3rd-8th grade students completed Part 2 of the state standardized testing online (unless otherwise called for paper-pencil testing due to an ISP). And, beginning with 2018 ISTEP+, students in grades 4-8 took both Part 1 and Part 2 online; grade 3 students took Part 1 as paper / pencil and Part 2 online. With the implementation of Indiana’s new assessment, ILearn, all students will complete all portions online unless paper-pencil testing is required due to an ISP. An improved Preschool is another major accomplishment. We understand that the best chance we have of increasing our enrollment from year to year is to do so by providing a high-quality feeder program with our preschool. During the summer of 2015, we welcomed a new preschool administrator who revamped the program from being a daycare to having strong academic standards. A new lead prekindergarten teacher who has a Master’s degree has continued to strengthen the curriculum since her joining the staff in 2017. For a few years prior to these changes, our kindergarten teacher noted that students who came to her from our Preschool were academically behind due to a lack of instruction. Our preschool program is much stronger, and the entire school is much stronger as a result of these changes and is producing students who are socially and academically ready to be successful in kindergarten and beyond. Goals -- Increase Enrollment, Increase Student Achievement, and Increase Catholicity Not only are we striving to achieve these goals over the next few years, but always. We would say that Saint Bernard will always be looking to increase enrollment. We have 101 K-8 students, with a goal of 150. If each classroom had 17 students, we would have a total of 153 students in K-8. Fourth and sixth grades are currently our largest classes, with 17 students. Our smallest classes are third and eighth with 6 students per class. Our preschool program currently serves 22 students in full- and part-time programs. Our goal for preschool enrollment is to have 40 full-time students, with 20 in each classroom. We have a strong core of educators, parents and parishioners who make up our Marketing Committee. We meet monthly and try to accomplish at least one action item every quarter. We are increasing our signage around town. We try to be in the newspapers on a regular basis. We attend more community events than in the past. We participate in the Diocesan-wide Open House for prospective students and welcome parents and students to schedule school-day tours and shadowing opportunities. We are working to market the preschool program more aggressively. Our students have mailed Christmas cards to prospective families in the past. We can never do enough. We will continue to make our marketing efforts a top priority in order to increase our enrollment. Student achievement means that we have a focus on time so that each minute of the day emphasizes our curriculum. We try not to waste any time in our classrooms because there is so much work to be done. Teachers regularly look at locally created and state testing formative and summative data and use this data to guide their instruction. All teachers have data binders and have received professional development on the use of data in strengthening curriculum and each individual student's progress in meeting and surpassing state curriculum standards. PD in the use of data from Renaissance Star Reading and Math tests will further help teachers be able to identify standards that students need to improve upon—both individually and as an entire class. We attempt to identify our struggling students as early as possible through our RTI process which includes participation of a school psychologist and to get them remediation they need to be successful. Our preschool program has a goal that all prekindergarten students will have met first quarter 6
kindergarten academic standards by the end of their prekindergarten year. Our method for meeting this goal involves engaging our students in educational play activities that are fun and creative, but that also help reinforce the lessons of the week. In making learning fun, we hope to foster a love for learning while also improving retention of the material. Finally, we would like to continue to be the best Catholic school we can be. Teachers are focusing on how to increase the Catholicity in classrooms. Each K-8 grade classroom has adopted a classroom saint and a classroom seminarian. All teachers are asked to incorporate the following religion standards throughout the school day: The Mystery of God, The Creator of All Things; The Mystery of Christ, The Incarnate Word of God; The Mystery of the Holy Spirit, The Loving Presence of God; The Mystery of the Church, The People of God; God Teaches Us How to Live out Our Salvation; God Invites Us into Relationship through Personal Prayer & through Community Worship; and God Calls Us to Love and Serve Our Neighbor. During the 2016-17 school year, students created Christmas cards and pictures that were taken to Spencer county nursing home residents, and during Lent, students collected baby items and food items for Rockport's Christian Life Center. During the 2017-2018 school year, teachers and students focused on the diocese's "Called to Serve" theme and thought of opportunities to make a difference locally, nationally, and internationally. Service projects included raising money for hurricane relief in Puerto Rico and in Rockport, Texas and for sending a U.S. veteran on an Honor Flight to Washington, D.C. K-8 grades take turns leading Prayer Services and Stations of the Cross and reading, cantoring, and serving during school Masses. The 2018-19 theme is “Lighting the World with Hope.” Already this year, almost thirty staff and students had the opportunity to participate in Feed My Starving Children’s program to fill bags with rice and other grains. All faculty participate in the diocese's "Pathways" program to gain additional knowledge and insight into components of the Catholic Faith. Additional Information Provide any additional information you would like to share with the public and community that were not prompted in the previous sections. Saint Bernard Catholic School faculty, staff, students, and parents are continuously striving to be the best possible in order that we educate the whole child to serve the world as a responsible Christian. 7
Improvement Plan Stakeholder Involvement Introduction The responses should be brief, descriptive, and appropriate for the specific section. It is recommended that the responses are written offline and then transferred into the sections below. Improvement Planning Process Describe the process used to engage a variety of stakeholders in the development of the institution's improvement plan. Include information on how stakeholders were selected and informed of their roles, and how meetings were scheduled to accommodate them. St. Bernard uses both its teachers and staff as well as its school board to create and review plans such as: the St. Bernard Catholic School Strategic Plan, the School Improvement Plan, and the Health and Wellness Plan. Teachers, the School Board, and the Strategic Planning Committee have been very involved during numerous meetings the past several years, discussing strengths and areas of improvement. Teachers were selected by the principal, and after school meetings are held monthly. The staff spent multiple meetings working together to identify ways to strengthen St. Bernard Catholic School’s catholicity and academics. The St. Bernard School Board is comprised of 6 parish members of varying backgrounds, the Pastor, school principal, and preschool director. The Board’s purpose is to advise the principal and preschool director regarding policy and plans for the future. This board is chosen through a modified discernment process. Members serve a three-year term and then can be re-elected to a second three-year term. Six years is the maximum term. The board meets monthly unless a need arises to meet more; meetings are held in the evening to accommodate work schedules. The board includes five current school parents. Our preschool director is also a current school parent. There are three males and three females. Five of the six members also represent the school board on other church councils including finance committee and parish council. The Board receives yearly professional development from the Catholic Schools Office of the Diocese of Evansville. The Strategic Planning Committee consists of approximately twenty members, six of whom are Board members. Committee members represent a variety of demographics of the St. Bernard parish. During the development of the Strategic Plan, meetings happened approximately every three to four weeks; meetings were held in the evening to accommodate work schedules. Describe the representations from stakeholder groups that participated in the development of the improvement plan and their responsibilities in this process. The school’s faculty and staff were involved in the development of the School Improvement Plan. The teachers and staff include parents and relatives of current St. Bernard students, thereby making up another stakeholder group. Teachers are instrumental in the development of the School Improvement Plan. Discussion included how to develop meaningful and attainable goals that held all accountable to the school’s success. The School Improvement Plan is submitted to the School Board. Explain how the final improvement plan was communicated to all stakeholders, and the method 8
and frequency in which stakeholders receive information on its progress. When the School Improvement Plan is finished and approved by the Indiana State Board of Education, it will be shared with teachers and staff, parents, and the School Board. As the plan is changed and updated on an annual basis, all changes and updates will be communicated to all stakeholders in a timely manner. 9
Self-Assessment Introduction AdvancED's Self Assessment (SA) diagnostic is based on the AdvancED Standards of Quality, which serves as the foundation of the accreditation and continuous improvement process. The SA is a valuable tool for collaboratively engaging staff members and stakeholders in purposeful, honest dialogue and reflection to assess the institution's adherence to the Standards, and guide its continuous improvement efforts. The SA includes the institution's self-ratings of and the evidence cited for each of the indicators, comments that explain the indicator's ratings and an overall narrative for each Standard. The results of the SA are reviewed by the External Review Team as one essential component of the preparation process for the institution's External Review. Standard 1: Purpose and Direction The school maintains and communicates a purpose and direction that commit to high expectations for learning as well as shared values and beliefs about teaching and learning. Overall Rating: 2.0 Indicator Statement or Question Response Evidence Rating The school has a process for review, The school has a process for revision, and review, revision, and communication of its The school engages in a communication of its purpose. purpose. The process systematic, inclusive, and The process has been has been implemented. comprehensive process to implemented. The process 1.1 The process includes Level 2 review, revise, and includes participation by participation by communicate a school representatives from representatives from purpose for student success. stakeholder groups. The stakeholder groups. purpose statement focuses The purpose statement primarily on student success. focuses primarily on student success. The school's leadership and Commitment to shared values staff commit to a culture and beliefs about teaching and that is based on shared learning is sometimes evident values and beliefs about in documentation. This 1.2 teaching and learning and commitment is sometimes •Survey results Level 2 supports challenging, reflected in communication equitable educational among leaders and most staff. programs and learning Some challenging educational experiences for all students programs and equitable that include achievement of learning experiences are 10
learning, thinking, and life implemented so that all skills. students achieve some degree of learning, thinking, and life skills. Evidence indicates some commitment to instructional practices that include active student engagement, a focus on depth of understanding, and the application of knowledge and skills. School leadership maintains high expectations for professional practice. School leaders implement a continuous improvement process for improving student learning and the conditions that support learning. Some stakeholder groups are engaged in the process. School personnel maintain a profile with data on student and school performance. The profile contains data used to identify The school's leadership goals for the improvement of implements a continuous achievement and instruction improvement process that •The school continuous 1.3 that are aligned with the Level 2 provides clear direction for improvement plan school's purpose. The process improving conditions that includes action planning that support student learning. identifies measurable objectives, strategies, activities, resources, and timelines for achieving improvement goals. Most interventions and strategies are implemented with fidelity. Some documentation that the process yields improved student achievement and instruction is available. Reflect upon your responses to each of the indicators and performance levels by considering and responding to the following questions when drafting your narrative response. Use language from the performance level descriptions to guide your writing. Cite sources of evidence External Review 11
team members may be interested in reviewing. Our area of strength for Purpose and Direction is that the school's leadership implements a continuous improvement process that provides clear direction for improving conditions that support student learning. The school’s administrator has a personal philosophy of growing and improving each and every day, and teachers are reminded of this on a regular basis. Our area of improvement would be that the school engages in a systematic, inclusive, and comprehensive process to review, revise, and communicate a school purpose for student success. The actions we are implementing to sustain the strength would be our regular professional goal process. In order to improve the area of need, we should look at how we can better communicate our school purpose with the greater community. We have a mission statement and vision, but what more can we do with it? Standard 2: Governance and Leadership The school operates under governance and leadership that promote and support student performance and school effectiveness. Overall Rating: 2.0 Statement or Indicator Response Evidence Rating Question Policies and practices generally support the school's purpose and direction and the effective operation of the school. Most policies and practices The governing body promote effective establishes policies instruction and assessment and supports that produce equitable and •Student handbooks •Staff 2.1 practices that ensure Level 2 challenging learning handbooks •School handbooks effective experiences for all students. administration of the There are policies and school. practices regarding professional growth of staff. Policies and practices provide requirements and oversight of fiscal management. The governing body The governing body ensures •List of assigned staff for operates responsibly that its decisions and actions compliance 2.2 Level 2 and functions are in accordance with effectively. defined roles and •Governing body policies on responsibilities, are ethical, roles and responsibilities, 12
and free of conflict of conflict of interest interest. Governing body members participate in •Governing code of ethics professional development regarding the roles and responsibilities of the governing body and its individual members. The governing body complies with all policies, procedures, laws, and regulations. The governing body generally protects, supports, The governing body and respects the autonomy ensures that the of school leadership to school leadership accomplish goals for •Roles and responsibilities of has the autonomy to improvement in student school leadership meet goals for learning and instruction and 2.3 Level 2 achievement and to manage day-to-day •School improvement plan instruction and to operations of the school. developed by the school manage day-to-day The governing body usually operations maintains a distinction effectively. between its roles and responsibilities and those of school leadership. Leaders and staff make some decisions and take some actions toward continuous improvement. They expect all students to be held to standards. Leadership and staff Leaders and staff express a foster a culture desire for collective 2.4 consistent with the •Survey results Level 2 accountability for student school's purpose and learning. School leaders direction. sometimes support innovation, collaboration, shared leadership, and professional growth. The culture is characterized by a minimal degree of collaboration and limited 13
sense of community. Leaders sometimes communicate effectively with stakeholder groups, provide opportunities for stakeholders to shape Leadership engages decisions, solicit feedback stakeholders from stakeholders, work effectively in 2.5 collaboratively on school •Survey responses Level 2 support of the improvement efforts, and school's purpose and provide some leadership direction. roles for stakeholders. School leaders' efforts result in some stakeholder participation and engagement in the school. The criteria and processes of supervision and evaluation include references to professional practice and Leadership and staff student success. Supervision •Supervision and evaluation supervision and and evaluation processes are documents with criteria for evaluation processes implemented at minimal 2.6 improving professional Level 2 result in improved levels. The results of the practice and student success professional practice supervision and evaluation noted and student success. processes are used sometimes to monitor and effectively adjust professional practice and improve student learning. Reflect upon your responses to each of the indicators and performance levels by considering and responding to the following questions when drafting your narrative response. Use language from the performance level descriptions to guide your writing. Cite sources of evidence External Review team members may be interested in reviewing. Our area of strength would be that the governing body establishes policies and support practices that ensure effective administration of the school. The Board regularly discusses the school’s strengths and areas of concern. Our area in need of improvement is the governing body operates responsibly and functions effectively so that the school achieves its goals. It is hard to see how these two standards could be both a strength and a weakness because they are tied so closely together. The School Board and administration have a good relationship and work well together. There is open communication among all 14
members. Standard 3: Teaching and Assessing for Learning The school's curriculum, instructional design, and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and student learning. Overall Rating: 2.0 Statement or Indicator Response Evidence Rating Question Curriculum and learning experiences in each course/class provide most The school's students with challenging curriculum provides and equitable opportunities equitable and to develop learning skills, challenging learning thinking skills, and life experiences that skills. There is little ensure all students evidence to indicate 3.1 have sufficient •Lesson plans Level 2 curriculum and learning opportunities to experiences prepare develop learning, students for success at the thinking, and life next level. Most like skills that lead to courses/classes have success at the next equivalent learning level. expectations. Little individualization for each student is evident. School personnel monitor Curriculum, and adjust curriculum, instruction, and instruction, and assessment assessment are to ensure for vertical and monitored and horizontal alignment and •Common assessments adjusted alignment with the school's systematically in goals for achievement and •Standards-based report cards 3.2 response to data Level 2 instruction and statement of from multiple •Lesson plans aligned to the purpose. A process is assessments of implemented sometimes to curriculum student learning and ensure alignment when an examination of curriculum, instruction, professional and/or assessments are practice. reviewed or revised. There is limited evidence that the 15
continuous improvement process ensures vertical and horizontal alignment and alignment with the school's purpose in curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Teachers sometimes use instructional strategies that require student collaboration, self- reflection, and development of critical thinking skills. Teachers personalize Teachers engage instructional strategies and students in their interventions to address learning through •Findings from supervisor individual learning needs of instructional walk-thrus and observations 3.3 groups of students when Level 2 strategies that necessary. Teachers ensure achievement •Surveys results sometimes use instructional of learning strategies that require expectations. students to apply knowledge and skills, integrate content and skills with other disciplines, and use technologies as instructional resources and learning tools. 3.4 School leaders monitor instructional practices through supervision and evaluation procedures to School leaders ensure that they 1) are •Supervision and evaluation monitor and support aligned with the school's procedures the improvement of values and beliefs about instructional teaching and learning, 2) •Peer or mentoring Level 2 practices of teachers are teaching the approved opportunities and interactions to ensure student curriculum, 3) are directly success. engaged with all students in •Surveys results the oversight of their learning, and 4) use content-specific standards of professional practice. 16
3.5 Some members of the school staff participate in collaborative learning communities that meet both informally and formally. Collaboration occasionally occurs across grade levels and content areas. Staff Teachers participate members promote in collaborative discussion about student •Common language, protocols learning learning. Learning from, and reporting tools communities to Level 2 using, and discussing the improve instruction results of inquiry practices •Survey results and student such as action research, the learning. examination of student work, reflection, study teams, and peer coaching sometimes occur among school personnel. School personnel express belief in the value of collaborative learning communities. 3.6 Most teachers use an instructional process that informs students of learning expectations and standards of performance. Exemplars are sometimes provided to Teachers implement guide and inform students. the school's The process may include instructional process •Survey results Level 2 multiple measures, in support of student including formative learning. assessments, to inform the ongoing modification of instruction. The process provides students with feedback about their learning. 3.7 Mentoring, Some school personnel are coaching, and engaged in mentoring, induction programs coaching, and induction •Survey results Level 2 support instructional programs that are consistent improvement with the school's values and consistent with the beliefs about teaching, 17
school's values and learning, and the conditions beliefs about that support learning. These teaching and programs set expectations learning. for school personnel. 3.8 The school engages families in Programs that engage meaningful ways in families in their children's their children's education are available. •Survey results Level 2 education and keeps School personnel provide them informed of information about children's their children's learning. learning progress. 3.9 School personnel participate in a structure The school has a that gives them interaction formal structure with individual students, whereby each allowing them to build student is well relationships over time with known by at least the student. Most students one adult advocate •Survey results Level 2 participate in the structure. in the school who The structure allows the supports that school employee to gain student's insight into the student's educational needs regarding learning experience. skills, thinking skills, and life skills. 3.10 Most teachers use common grading and reporting policies, processes, and Grading and procedures based on criteria reporting are based that represent each student's on clearly defined •Evaluation process for grading attainment of content criteria that and reporting practices knowledge and skills. These represent the policies, processes, and attainment of •Survey results Level 2 procedures are implemented content knowledge across grade levels and •Sample report cards for each and skills and are courses. Most stakeholders consistent across grade level and for all courses are aware of the policies, grade levels and processes, and procedures. courses. The policies, processes, and procedures may or may not be evaluated. 18
3.11 Most staff members participate in a program of professional learning that is aligned with the school's All staff members purpose and direction. participate in a Professional development is continuous program •Survey results Level 2 based on the needs of the of professional school. The program builds learning. capacity among staff members who participate. The program is regularly evaluated for effectiveness. 3.12 School personnel use data to identify unique learning needs of special populations of students based on proficiency and/or other learning needs (such as •Survey results The school provides second languages). School and coordinates •List of learning support personnel are familiar with learning support services and student population research related to unique Level 2 services to meet the served by such services characteristics of learning unique learning (such as learning styles, •Data used to identify unique needs of students. multiple intelligences, learning needs of students personality type indicators) and provide or coordinate related learning support services to students within these special populations. Reflect upon your responses to each of the indicators and performance levels by considering and responding to the following questions when drafting your narrative response. Use language from the performance level descriptions to guide your writing. Cite sources of evidence External Review team members may be interested in reviewing. The strengths that we noted in Standard 3 are that the school's curriculum provides equitable and challenging learning experiences that ensure all students have sufficient opportunities to develop learning, thinking, and life skills that lead to success at the next level. The area that we need the most improvement in is for all teachers to engage all students in their learning through instructional strategies that ensure achievement of learning expectations. It is known in our community that St. Bernard students, who go on to attend South Spencer High School, are successful academically. Teachers and the administrator have spoken with teachers and administrators at the high school who repeatedly comment that they can immediately tell the difference between a student who attended St. Bernard and another school. They 19
claim that students who attended St. Bernard are better prepared academically, are more at ease with speaking in class, and are overall well-rounded kids. St. Bernard students and graduates are polite, respectful, thoughtful, hard-working, and organized. This is evidence that we are meeting our mission to educate the whole child to serve the world as a responsible Christian. To increase our area of need we need to focus on instructional strategies that truly engage all students. By using assessment data to focus in on students’ areas of weakness, teachers will be able to better help all students reach the standards set by the state. Standard 4: Resources and Support Systems The school has resources and provides services that support its purpose and direction to ensure success for all students. Overall Rating: 2.0 Statement or Indicator Response Evidence Rating Question Policies, processes, and procedures describe how school leaders are to access, hire, place, and retain qualified Qualified professional and support professional and staff. School leaders support staff are determine the number of sufficient in number •Policies, processes, procedures personnel necessary to fill to fulfill their roles and other documentation the roles and 4.1 and responsibilities related to the hiring, placement Level 2 responsibilities necessary necessary to support and retention of professional to support the school the school's purpose, and support staff purpose, educational direction, and the programs, and continuous educational improvement. Sustained program. fiscal resources are available to fund most positions critical to achieve the purpose and direction of the school. Instructional time, Instructional time, material •Survey results •School 4.2 Level 2 material resources, resources, and fiscal schedule •School calendar and fiscal resources resources are sometimes 20
are sufficient to focused on supporting the support the purpose purpose and direction of and direction of the the school. Instructional school. time is usually protected. School leaders attempt to secure material and fiscal resources to meet the needs of all students. School leaders express a desire to allocate instructional time, material resources, and fiscal resources so that all students have equitable opportunities to attain challenging learning expectations. Efforts toward the continuous improvement of instruction and operations sometimes include achieving the school's purpose and direction. School leaders have some expectations for maintaining safety, cleanliness, and a healthy environment and have shared these definitions The school •Survey results and expectations with most maintains facilities, stakeholders. Selected services, and •Documentation of emergency school personnel are equipment to procedures such as fire drills, 4.3 accountable for Level 2 provide a safe, evacuation and other maintaining these clean, and healthy emergency procedures. expectations. Some environment for all measures are in place that students and staff. •Maintenance schedules allow for tracking of these conditions. Personnel work to improve these conditions. Results of improvement efforts are monitored. 4.4 Students and school Students and school •Survey results Level 2 personnel use a personnel have access to range of media and media and information 21
information resources necessary to resources to support achieve most of the the school's educational programs of educational the school. Personnel are programs. available to assist students and school personnel in learning about the tools and locations for finding and retrieving information. 4.5 The technology infrastructure meets the The technology teaching, learning, and infrastructure operational needs of most supports the school's stakeholders. School •Survey results Level 2 teaching, learning, personnel have a and operational technology plan to improve needs. technology services and infrastructure. 4.6 School personnel endeavor to determine the physical, social, and emotional needs of students in the school. The school provides School personnel provide support services to or coordinate programs to meet the physical, meet the needs of students social, and when possible. School •Survey results Level 2 emotional needs of personnel evaluate all the student programs. Improvement population being plans related to these served. programs are sometimes designed and implemented to meet the needs of students. 4.7 School personnel endeavor The school provides to determine the •List of services available services that support counseling, assessment, related to counseling, the counseling, referral, educational, and assessment, referral, assessment, referral, career planning needs of educational, and career Level 2 educational, and students in the school. planning career planning School personnel provide needs of all or coordinate programs to •Description of IEP process students. meet the needs of students when possible. School 22
personnel evaluate all programs. Improvement plans related to these programs are sometimes designed and implemented to meet the needs of students. Reflect upon your responses to each of the indicators and performance levels by considering and responding to the following questions when drafting your narrative response. Use language from the performance level descriptions to guide your writing. Cite sources of evidence External Review team members may be interested in reviewing. Our area of strength is that our qualified professional and support staff are sufficient in number to fulfill their roles and responsibilities necessary to support the school's purpose, direction, and the educational program. Our school provides support services to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of the student population being served. Our staff is a dedicated group who have worked together many years. Each year they continue to work closer together for the good for our students and school community. That being said, it would be nice to add an additional teacher who could teach our special classes: music, art, physical education, and technology. We have a solid group of professional educators. We can continue this trend through our hiring process by pursuing the right people to be on the St. Bernard Catholic School team. One area in need of major improvement is that we must improve our technology—both infrastructure and devices. Some improvements have been made—increasing the number of grades who have a laptop dedicated for their use. But, our internet signal is not stable, so teachers are not able to consistently use technology to drive their instruction. Improvements to the technology infrastructure have been included in the school’s three-year Strategic Plan. Standard 5: Using Results for Continuous Improvement The school implements a comprehensive assessment system that generates a range of data about student learning and school effectiveness and uses the results to guide continuous improvement. Overall Rating: 2.0 Statement or Indicator Response Evidence Rating Question The school School personnel use an •Survey results establishes and assessment system that 5.1 Level 2 maintains a clearly produces data from •Evidence that assessments are defined and multiple assessment reliable and bias free comprehensive measures about student 23
student assessment learning and school system. performance. The system generally provides consistent measurement across classrooms and courses. Some assessments, especially those related to student learning, are proven reliable and bias free. The system is evaluated for effectiveness in improving instruction, student learning, and the conditions that support learning. Some processes and procedures for collecting, Professional and analyzing, and applying support staff learning from data sources continuously collect, are used by professional analyze, and apply and support staff. Data •Survey results learning from a sources include limited range of data comparison and trend data •Examples of use of data to sources, including 5.2 about student learning, design, implement, and Level 2 comparison and instruction, the evaluate continuous trend data about effectiveness of programs, improvement plans and apply student learning, and organizational learning instruction, program conditions. School evaluation, and personnel use data to organizational design, implement, and conditions. evaluate continuous improvement plans. Most professional and Professional and support staff members are support staff are assessed and trained in a trained in the 5.3 professional development •Survey results Level 2 evaluation, program related to the interpretation, and evaluation, interpretation, use of data. and use of data. 5.4 The school engages A process exists for •Student surveys Level 2 in a continuous analyzing data that process to determine determine improvement in •Evidence of student readiness 24
verifiable student learning, including for the next level improvement in readiness for and success at student learning, the next level. Results •Evidence of student growth including readiness indicate mixed levels of for and success at improvement, and school •Evidence of student success at the next level. personnel sometimes use the next level these results to design, implement, and evaluate the results of continuous improvement action plans related to student learning, including readiness for and success at the next level. 5.5 Leadership monitors and communicates Leaders monitor comprehensive information about student information about learning, conditions that student learning, support student learning, conditions that and the achievement of •Survey results Level 2 support student school improvement goals. learning, and the Leaders communicate achievement of results to all stakeholder school improvement groups. goals to stakeholders. Reflect upon your responses to each of the indicators and performance levels by considering and responding to the following questions when drafting your narrative response. Use language from the performance level descriptions to guide your writing. Cite sources of evidence External Review team members may be interested in reviewing. Our area of strength is that our school establishes and maintains a clearly defined and comprehensive student assessment system. Our area that needs improving is that professional and support staff are trained in the evaluation, interpretation, and use of data. I think our strength comes from our teachers being in the same grade levels for a few years and becoming comfortable with student assessment. Of course we have ISTEP, SRI, and we have recently added STAR which we will be learning more about together over the next few months. Analyzing data was introduce to St. Bernard just a few years ago and teachers have been slowly becoming more comfortable with the process. Classroom observations, professional growth plans, and teacher collaboration will focus more on this process in the future. 25
Report Summary Scores by Section 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4 Standard 5 Standard 1: Purpose and Direction Standard 2: Governance and Leadership Standard 3: Teaching and Assessing for Learning Standard 4: Resources and Support Systems Standard 5: Using Results for Continuous Improvement 26
Saint Bernard Catholic School 2020-2021 Goals Goals Summary The following is a summary of the goals encompassed in this plan. The details for each goal are available in the next section. Our four 20-21 school goals are 1) to raise reading scores as measured by lexile or dibils scores, 2) to raise math scores as measured by quantile scores, 3) to increase the Catholicity of the school as measured by surveys and observation, and 4) to increase the enrollment of the entire school (preschool - 8th) as measured by enrollment numbers. Goal #1: Increase the Catholicity of all students and staff at St. Bernard Catholic School Goal Type: Religious Total Funding: $250.00 Measurable Objective 1: Demonstrate a behavior of increasing the knowledge of the Catholic faith, its sacraments and saints, and various prayers by 5/10/2019 as measured by an end-of-the-year survey. Research Cited: Increased opportunities Evidence of success: Results from survey Documentation of trainings Calendars of prayer services, Masses, and other religious events. Strategy 1: Include one additional in-class religion lesson and/or activity each week. Activity 1: Implement a classroom saint, a saint of the month, a saint of the week, or a saint of the day activity into each grade’s routine. Activity 2: Read Bible stories, Bible verses, and / or other religious texts and discuss with students. Activity 3: Purposefully help students in the memorization and comprehension of grade-level required prayers. Activity 4: Prepare specific lessons correlated to Vocations Week which takes place in early November each year. Strategy 2: Provide families with monthly faith-formation opportunities. Activity 1: With guidance from the parish’s Director of Religious Education, provide families with a copy of Advent Traditions, Lenten Traditions, and other Ordinary Time Traditions. 27
Activity 2: Communicate with families the times of prayer services, masses, parish youth activities, and Vacation Bible School. Strategy 3: Require active participation in Pathways training by all faculty members. Activity 1: Document yearly attendance at Pathways training. Strategy 4: Support active participation by all staff members in prayer services, Masses, and other religious events. Activity 1: Provide non-Catholic staff members with a Catholic mentor. Activity 2: Provide all staff members with information about and/or a calendar of school and parish prayer services, Masses, and other local and regional religious events. Activity 3: Bring in Fr. Ron Kreilein, Carolyn Thorpe, and deacons for question/answer opportunities during staff meetings and other activities. Measurable Objective 2: Demonstrate a behavior of serving those in need by 5/10/2019 as measured by an end of the year survey. Research Cited: Increased opportunities Evidence of success: Results from survey Documentation of service opportunities Strategy 1: Develop and carry out opportunities for students to serve others locally, nationally, and/or internationally. Activity 1: Create and implement quarterly service projects. Activity 2: Create and implement seasonal school-wide service projects and/or projects that respond to a unique need (ie., hurricane relief, veterans). Goal #2: All students in grades preschool through eighth grade at St. Bernard Catholic School will improve their reading level and/or Lexile score. Goal Type: Academic Total Funding: $250.00 Measurable Objective 1: 80% of 2nd-8th grade students will demonstrate a behavior of increasing their reading level, their Lexile by 75 points and/or be above grade level in their Lexile in Reading by 5/10/2010 as measured by growth on their Scholastic Reading Inventory assessments and/or STAR Reading. Research Cited: Best practices Increased opportunities to read 28
Evidence of success: Reports from Scholastic Reading Inventory and/or STAR Reading Data from Title 1 Fluency Reads Data from locally created formative and summative assessments Standards-based Assessments Strategy 1: Increase the amount of daily reading. Activity 1: Create daily schedules that increase and protect reading times. Activity 2: Include reading as a part of before-school morning work. Activity 3: Each grade level will have student independent reading times integrated into their schedules. Strategy 2: Increase the amount of non-fiction included within each grade level’s reading curriculum. Activity 1: Students will include in their reading efforts specific reading instruction in science and social studies. Activity 2: Students will have regular opportunities to select non-fiction materials from classroom libraries, the Rockport Public Library, or other non-fiction collections. Activity 3: Teachers will use state standards to ensure curriculum includes all grade-level non- fiction concepts. Strategy 3: 3-8 teachers will explicitly teach both fiction and non-fiction reading strategies through Close-Reading activities. Activity 1: Teachers will receive professional development in Close-Reading techniques. Activity 2: Students will have regular and repeated instruction in how to, in a grade-level appropriate fashion, analyze fiction and non-fiction passages. Strategy 4: K-8 ELA teachers will use a consistent school-wide program, such as STAR Reading or STAR Early Literacy, for ELA assessments. Activity 1: St. Bernard Catholic School will ensure that a computer-based program is available for K-8 teachers to use regularly with their students. Activity 2: Teachers will assess all K-8 students during the designated diocesan testing windows. Activity 3: Within one week of each testing window, teachers will access Star Math data reports to differentiate lessons specific to the needs of their students. Strategy 5: Preschool through kindergarten curriculum will incorporate letters, sounds, and sight words in classroom activities and centers. Activity 1: Students will have daily visual, audio, and kinesthetic activities which introduce and/or deepen students’ knowledge of letters, sounds, and sight words. 29
You can also read