Robo-advisors: the rise of automated financial advice - Ipsos
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Robo-advisors: the rise of automated financial advice Has digital disruption in the financial industry created a win-win-win scenario for consumers, financial service companies and upstart FinTech companies? Or can the existing market dynamics support the growth everyone is banking on? POINT OF VIEW
An Ipsos Point of View Robo-advisors: the rise of automated financial advice Robo-advisors: the rise of automated financial advice Our Point of View: At Ipsos, we’ve been tracking financial technology trends on behalf of our financial services clients, keeping an eye on emerging new technology and patterns. We’re particularly interested in the current state of digital advisory services that debuted on the scene over five years ago: robo-advisors. Robo-advisors sit at the intersection of some of our favorite topics—innovation, new technology, and digitization of services. Our take is that while the rhetoric and hype may rile the skeptics, the impact of this new technology, and its consumer adoption, is significant. We see more market expansion than market disruption, and barring any significant market downturn, this will be a win-win-win for consumers, financial service companies, and the new FinTech players in automated financial advice. What Does Robo-advisor • Robo “Hybrids,” launched from established investment companies, offer mostly automated portfolio manage- Mean to Us? ment with some human advisors available at higher rates. They also have investment minimums, but Let’s start with getting our terms straight. Defined broadly, provide services at lower rates than their traditional robo-advisors are automated portfolio management ser- offerings. vices that act with little or no direct human intervention, providing those services at costs lower than those • Robo Platform Providers who “white label” their tech- provided by financial advisors. Some new financial tech- nology for banks and wealth management firms to offer nology firms with venture capital backing may have basic portfolio management to beginning investors. assumed a more prominent role in media attention, but Based on currently available numbers, the global rise of the market is actually more than just a single business robo-advisory services show great success. Worldwide model. We see the “robo world” in three parts: users grew from 2.8 million in 2015 to 5.7 million in 2016, • Pureplay companies offer investors easy onboarding worldwide, with assets under management (AUM) rising with questions about risk, age, income, and goals. in turn from $66 billion to $126 billion.1 Here in the United They offer a limited number of funds, and little or no States, where coverage of robo-advisors tends to focus personal interaction with customers. Their interfaces on pureplay firms like Betterment, Wealthfront, Personal show investments, growth, and projected returns. At Investor, Blooom and SigFig, growth has been swift, rising most basic, these are “set-and-forget” investment vehi- from $11.5 billion in April 2014 to an estimated $61 billion cles with personally-motivated contributions toward in June 2016.2 goals like home purchase, education, or retirement. 1 Statista: “Digital Market Outlook: Robo-advisors” 2016. 2 Benefits Pro / Business Research Inc: “Robo-advisors will disrupt market: study,” Aug 8, 2016. 2 Copyright© 2017 Ipsos. All rights reserved.
An Ipsos Point of View Robo-advisors: the rise of automated financial advice Market Disruption or It’s Really About the Market Expansion? Cost of Investing We almost hate to use the D-word, but disruption has New investors may be shocked by the costs for managing dominated the reams of reports and commentaries over investments. Traditional wealth managers charge 1– 3% emerging financial technologies (FinTech), and it’s also of their clients’ portfolios every year, even when there been central to industry coverage of robo-advisories. are few changes to the portfolio outside of occasional There were over 5,100 articles published since 2012 that rebalancing of assets, or help to keep taxes low. When refer to robo-advisors, and eight in ten also use the word robo-advisers provide similar services, they will do it for “disruption.” 3 With so many kinds of financial services 0.25% or so a year. providers facing encroachment from FinTech companies Largely because they quash fees, robo-services do a in payments, retail banking and insurance, this scale of good job for anyone interested in starting a basic invest- coverage was not surprising. ment portfolio. Their simple onboarding process starts However, we think that disruption is more than just a with a basic questionnaire—age, salary, investment aims buzzword. It’s a fundamental shift in the quality or and the like—that helps establish risk appetite relative essence of the industry affected. It’s also a lasting impact to financial goals. Money is then allocated to low-cost that goes beyond the excitement of a fad, and has the funds provided by third parties. For those who believe potential to change related industries and consumer that fees and human error are the main pitfalls of invest- behaviors. ing, the approach is hard to beat. In the case of robo-advisors, where is the disruption? In that context, we see robo-advisors as market expand- After all, online financial service platforms are widely ers more than market disruptors. By reducing fees and known and used by today’s consumers. A majority of lowering or eliminating entry thresholds, they aim to adults bank online (61%) and many by mobile phone attract more people into investing and participating in (43%).4 More than half (56%) have used mobile payment their personal financial growth. services.5 With robo-advisors, there is no Blockbuster So much of the coverage of robo-advisors is focused on Video falling to Netflix or taxi industry losing share to the under-35 segment who make up a significant portion Uber. of first-time investors. However, it’s not just Millennials In today’s online financial environment, would adoption of who are showing interest in the category. Our Ipsos automated investing show a significant behavioral shift? Affluent study, among Americans with $100k+ annual We don’t think so. Online financial services have long income, shows that robo-advisor usage exceeds 3 million. been embraced, so robo-investing will feel familiar to While that may be only 4% of the affluent segment, there many. More likely, customers will be attracted to easy are almost 5.3 million that say they are likely to use a online onboarding, goal-setting, and personal profiling to robo-advisor in the next 12 months, and over 9 million tailor an account to their needs. We also find that this interested in learning more.6 innovation-by-reduction—the simplified offers, automatic rebalancing, and limited selection of investment prod- ucts—to be a winning approach to getting a new customer to invest. 3 5 Based on a targeted search in Factiva for all mentions of robo-advisors in US media. eMarketer September 2016 based on 136 million user estimate among Americans 14 years Jan 2012 – Mar 2017. and older. 4 6 US Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Base: adults with bank accounts in 2015. Ipsos Affluent Survey in 2016 estimates 75.5 million affluent American consumers Mobile banking base among adults with phones. (HHI above $100K). 3 Copyright© 2017 Ipsos. All rights reserved.
An Ipsos Point of View Robo-advisors: the rise of automated financial advice Lack of Perceived Value When asked in a 2015 survey if they were concerned about robo-advisors, 82% of RIAs said they weren’t. Wealth management professionals and registered invest- When asked again a year later, the response was much ment advisors (RIAs) may be forced to the same. In both years, only 1% of RIA respondents said recognize that new investors are questioning advisors’ they were “extremely concerned.” 8 In our view, the current commissions and fees associated with investing. In recent wealth managers dismiss the robo-advisor models investor forum posts, and in our own qualitative research, as something for small fry, and with most RIAs being we noted skepticism about advisors—often derided as compensated on a commission basis, robo-advisors are specialized salesmen pressuring customers into products too small to be of any concern to them. that increased commissions. From a young consumer perspective, the investment Ipsos research shows (Figure 1) that among affluent GenX advisors have serious perception barriers. Only 25% of and Millennial groups, half consider the professional Millennials work with a financial professional, although advisor just “nice to have.” About an eighth of Millennials almost half have a 401K and a third have an IRA.9 Two in and a quarter of GenX think they are “unimportant.” 7 five Millennials (41%) have not worked with a financial professional because they think they don’t have enough That’s why we think the investment professionals may be money saved to begin. However, what should be most the ones most likely to experience disruption. Strangely, troubling to RIAs is a simple issue of value. A third of Mil- they don’t seem to care. lennials think investment professionals are too expensive.10 Figure 1: A FINANCIAL ADVISOR IS A… Must-have Nice to have Unimportant AFFLUENT MILLENNIALS 37% 50% 13% Must-have Nice to have Unimportant AFFLUENT GENXERS 27% 48% 25% 7 9 Ipsos Affluent Millennial Study. Principal Financial Group: Millennial Study 2015. 8 10 TD Ameritrade Survey 12/2016. ibid. 4 Copyright© 2017 Ipsos. All rights reserved.
An Ipsos Point of View Robo-advisors: the rise of automated financial advice The Entry of the Hybrid Robo Company Market Entrants Since 2015 Minimum Investment as of 2017 In our view, the traditional banking and investment Vanguard Personal Advisor $10,000 industry’s fear of disintermediation and replacement Services was a good thing for all involved—consumers, banks and Merrill Edge Guided Investing $5,000 FinTech firms. The broad industry reaction to a perceived Charles Schwab Intelligent Portfolios $5,000 threat has strengthened the overall offerings available to (online only) consumers, as banks and investment firms expanded Capital One Advisor Connect $25,000 their digital offerings, and FinTech firms found tie-ups Fidelity Fidelity Go $5,000 with financial companies to expand their customer bases. Blackrock Acquired FutureAdvisor NA This is simply giving people what they expect. Even as to provide B2B automated platform early as 2014, a survey of 1,600 investors asked if in management services the future, “technological advances in providing financial to RBC Wealth advice will better serve individuals with regard to value Management, LPL Financial, and BBVA and cost than financial advisors.” More than 76% of Compass Bank. Millennial respondents, 67% of Generation X and just over Wells Fargo Partnership with SigFig NA half of baby boomers (54%) answered yes.11 to develop a new robo-advisory for Wells By the end of 2015, some of the nation’s largest banks Fargo Advisors for and investment firms moved to expand their offerings 2017 pilot. to include automated advisory services, but with a key difference to pureplay robos. Each promised some form Based on awareness alone, the hybrid development of personal advice available on demand (usually at a was a great success. Just months after launch, 51% of higher management fee). Most of the hybrids maintain these companies’ bank clients surveyed by KPMG knew minimum investment thresholds. about Schwab Intelligent Portfolios, and 48% knew of Vanguard Personal Advisor Services. That was triple the Whether through acquisition, partnership, or internal awareness of FutureAdvisor (16%), and five times that development, the investment companies recognized of Wealthfront (10.1%) or Betterment (9.5%).12 The AUM that some of their clients and prospects would want of Vanguard’s Personal Advisor Services after a year automated advisory services on some level. They were reached $41 billion, and Schwab Intelligent Portfolios’ hit not going to wait for FinTechs’ pureplay robo-advisors to $8.1 billion.13 Even if their success was from poaching steal their clients. Since 2015 we’ve seen the launches current customers—and Schwab says half of its hybrid captured in the following table. customers are long term investors saving for retirement— awareness and AUM show the competitive power of established brands in the automated investment space. 11 State Street Center for Applied Research. 12 FinTechNews.ch, Feb 24, 2016, quoting KPMG study data. 13 Vanguard AUM reported in RIABiz, Aug 2, 2016. Schwab SEC filings cited by Financial Planning Magazine, Jul 16, 2016. 5 Copyright© 2017 Ipsos. All rights reserved.
An Ipsos Point of View Robo-advisors: the rise of automated financial advice Outlook – What’s Ahead? At Ipsos, we see four key factors beyond AUM impacting the future of automated advice services. We think that there is still growth ahead for the category. 1. First, the growth we’ve seen in the sector has Both affluent investors and new Millennial savers have happened in a thriving market with low interest rates. shown significant interest, and with broader deployment That means people want to do more with their money of Robo-style tools into 401Ks (like the Betterment for than put it into safe savings with a 1% return. If a Business or FutureAdvisor offerings) it is likely that more market downturn occurs, new investors will need to corporate employees across age groups will use them slow down or liquidate savings. Or, if interest rates in company savings plans. increase and a savings account provides FDIC security When the hybrid robos launched, industry watchers rushed and a decent return, that might change the minds of to declare the imminent demise of pureplays. The Econo- young savers. In either case, it’s likely to most mist, for example, reported in 2015 that with slowing AUM adversely impact pureplay robos. growth, and pressure from venture capital backers, lead- 2. As American workers continue to participate in the ers like Betterment and Wealthfront would not be “Gig Economy” there will be fewer 401K investors able to scale sufficiently to turn a profit. Morningstar and more self-directed savers. Nearly 54 million analyst Michael Wong estimated that pureplay robo- Americans participated in some form of independent advisors need somewhere between $16B and $40B of work in 2015, which represents about a third of AUM just to cover core operating costs and recoup the workforce.16 About 10 million workers get more than advertising expenses.14 With a current linear growth half of their income this way. This should bode well for pace of even $150M per month, Betterment and Wealth- automated investing’s low cost and self-directed front may not even reach $10B of AUM by 2020. More approach, especially among younger, tech-savvy, troubling, the average account size for Betterment has self-employed professionals without a lot to invest, and flatlined around $20,000, and declined at Wealthfront generally unsure of the value RIAs provide. from $80,000 in Q1 2015 to $45,000 a year later.15 Our quick math says that a $5 billion AUM pureplay robo 3. The Bureau of Economic Analysis reports that Americans’ would only generate $12.5 million gross revenue at a personal savings rate is just 5.7%.17 An independent 0.25% fee structure. Would that adequately support study by Fidelity that factors in employer contributions the staff and marketing budgets required to sustain puts the number higher, at 8.5%,18 but both are below operations and customer acquisition? the 10% most industry analysts recommend for retire- ment. Wages have been stagnant in real dollar terms for years, so the anticipated new inflow of funds into investments may be unrealistic. 4. Compliance may hinder traditional financial service companies but, as of now, pureplay robo-advisors have avoided regulatory scrutiny that generally comes with providing financial advice. The algorithms and modern portfolio theory that guides investments is not personally driven—or is it? As more personal advice becomes available on a fee basis, pureplay robos may come under greater government scrutiny. Compliance will always present operational costs. 14 16 CNBC report “Is the twilight of the robo-advisor already at hand?” cites Wong’s research, smallbusinesstrends.com Paul Chaney. “20 Surprising Stats About the Gig Economy” July 25, 2016 14 Jun 2016. 17 blog.bea.gov/category/personal-savings/ 15 Industry Analyst Michael Kitces, Nerds Eye View, blog, 2 May 2016. 18 www.fidelity.com/about-fidelity/individual-investing/americas-savings-rate-improves Jan 7, 2016 6 Copyright© 2017 Ipsos. All rights reserved.
An Ipsos Point of View Robo-advisors: the rise of automated financial advice All About Acquisition Oddly enough, their new brands may work to their advantage. In so many of our concept tests, we see The challenge for robo-advising, as we see it, will still good financial service ideas grabbing customers’ interest, be primarily about customer acquisition. This is true for but then see the market scores drop when associated all players in the robo space, but perhaps a bit more with established financial service brands. It is possible pressing for pureplays. Traditional financial service that the pureplay robos will continue to attract customers providers like banks and large investment firms will and grow as “challenge brands” that play Startup Davids likely be conflicted about shifting price sensitive, small to Big Financial Goliaths. Their scale, simple onboarding, investment customers away from higher-fee-generating limited number of funds and no-advisor-meeting-to-start products. We expect they will approach the growth might continue to win over those who are fee averse or of their new hybrids cautiously, and wait for customers distrusting of RIA motives. to request those options rather than seek to poach At Ipsos we continue to believe that true consumer customers away from pureplay robo-advisors. understanding is critical to the success of automated RIAs in middle or large scale wealth management firms investment services, no matter who is offering them. As may find their toolkits adapting to and benefiting from conditions change, and major players shift and partner new white label platforms like BlackRock’s FutureAdvisor. and acquire to expand their investment service offerings, This presents an opportunity to capture a new investor financial institutions will need to pay careful attention to who wants only to start a small account, but who may customer needs and how online capabilities will change grow into more lucrative products and services. An with them. RIA might say, in effect, “Start saving here, and I’m ready when you want to talk.” That is a long-term, relationship-building approach that could develop from a robo-style platform. It is the pureplay robos that must work hard to increase awareness and attract customers. By adapting to some B2B offerings with corporations, they may find new customers—the half of consumers with 401Ks—more familiar with their brands and services when they change jobs or rollover accounts. They may also find that customer data on top savers and account growers will show a path to new customer acquisition. 7 Copyright© 2017 Ipsos. All rights reserved.
An Ipsos Point of View Robo-advisors: the rise of automated financial advice Authors About Ipsos Sanjay Ponnaiya is a Senior Vice President at Ipsos, Ipsos is an independent market research company con- with 20 years of experience assisting companies with trolled and managed by research professionals. Founded innovation, product development and brand marketing. in France in 1975, Ipsos has grown into a worldwide One of his areas of concentration is financial services. research group with a strong presence in all key markets. Sanjay led the development of the financial services Ipsos ranks third in the global research industry. practice within Ipsos’ innovation specialism and he has At Ipsos we are passionately curious about people, worked on many of the noteworthy financial services markets, brands and society. We make our changing innovations that have gone to market in the past 15 years. world easier and faster to navigate and inspire clients sanjay.ponnaiya@ipsos.com to make smarter decisions. We deliver with security, speed, simplicity and substance. We are Game Changers. Kerri Ryan is a Senior Vice President at Ipsos, with 20 years of experience consulting with large services With offices in 88 countries, Ipsos delivers insightful and technology companies. Her passion is helping expertise across six research specializations: advertising, clients grow their businesses by understanding buying customer loyalty, marketing, media, public affairs research, behavior, identifying new opportunities and building and survey management. strong brands. Ipsos researchers assess market potential and interpret kerri.ryan@ipsos.com market trends. We develop and build brands. We help clients build long-term relationships with their customers. We test advertising and study audience responses to various media and they measure public opinion around the globe. Visit www.ipsos.com/en-us to learn more about Ipsos’ offerings and capabilities. 8 Copyright© 2017 Ipsos. All rights reserved. 1 7 - 0 5 - 0 1
You can also read