Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores

Page created by Stacy Nichols
 
CONTINUE READING
Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores
Protein Translocation Through
                    Artificial Nanopores

                               Marc Creus
                            University of Basel

                                ERBM4 Liège

A WHOLE nano-world to be explored!

Institute of Microtechnology (Neuchâtel)   Institute of Chemistry (Neuchâtel)
          Dr Urs Staufer                             Dr Marc Creus
          Dr Anpan Han                               Prof Thomas Ward
          Prof Nico de Rooij
Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores
First patent application for Coulter Counter: 1949

      “You cannot patent a hole!”
US Patent granted: 1953, USPT 2656508

                                          Wallace H. Coulter (1913-1998)
                                    Engineer, Inventor, Entrepreneur, Visionary
Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores
Application of Coulter Principle:
                     Blood-Cell Counter

The complete blood count or “CBC” is
one of the most commonly ordered
diagnostic tests worldwide.

Today, ninety-eight percent of CBCs
are performed on instruments using the
Coulter Principle.
Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores
Micro vs Nano

             10µm

                 1nm
           (e.g. diametre of
           a small protein,
           which is
           10 000 x smaller
           than this small cell)
Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores
Since the nano-scale corresponds to the size of
   biological macromolecules, nanopores could be
   useful in biochemical analyses of proteins.

                                                                    ~5nm

“We have friends in other fields---in biology, for instance. We physicists often look at them and
say, (…) ``You should use more mathematics, like we do.'' They could answer us (…) ``What
you should do in order for us to make more rapid progress is to make the electron microscope
100 times better.''
                                                  Richard Feynman, December 29th 1959
                                                  “There’s plenty of room at the bottom”
                                                  http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html
Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores
Structure of DNA
•   Genetic data
•   Primary structure
    – Polymer of A, T, C, G
•   Secondary structure
    - B helix
    – Diameter
      2 nm
•   Tertiary structure              Alberts et al.
Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores
Structure of Proteins
•   Primary structure
    – Polymer of 20 amino acids
•   Secondary structure
    – α-helix, β-strands, coils
•   Tertiary structure
•   Quaternary structure
    – Multi protein complex, filaments
•   Typical diameter: 1 - 20 nm                 Ovalbumin
                                         Deposition: Stein , Leslie,
                                            1990 PDB: 1OVA
Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores
Properties of macromolecules:

•      Surface charge: positive, neutral or negative

                      -DNA (an acid) is usually negatively
                      charged
    Acid (low) pH                                      Basic (high) pH

                    -Proteins can be basic or acidic
                    and have different charges
                    depending on the pH
                                                                         Alberts et al.
Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores
More properties of macromolecules:
               Specific interactions

•   Proteins are designed for recognition:
    antibodies, hormones, enzymes,
    structural proteins, toxins, etc…
Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores
How can a biochemist make use of
         synthetic nanopores?
•   Measure size, charge, structural
    properties and interactions of
    proteins, in real-time and in solution?
Process flow chart nanopore fabrication

 500 nm SiO2      AZ 1518 both sides              KOH etching rinsing
  20 nm Si3N4

  spin PMMA       backside alignment                   oxidation
                  optical lithography
     20nm

 e-beam litho.      RIE, stripping              chip level PDMS bonding

                      silicon           Si3N4         SiO2
 RIE, stripping
                      PMMA              PDMS          AZ 1518
Wafer-level nanopore fabrication process

PDMS
                   lp= 20nm

                                    25 nm
 Si3N4
  SiO2

   Si

  SiO2
 Si3N4
Experiment setup
Measured parameters
•   Count the numbers of
    spikes per minute
    – Number of spikes
      proportional to
      concentration

•   Individual spikes
    – Duration: ∆t
    – Current change: ∆I
                              ∆I
                                     ∆t
Four different proteins, differing in size and
                    charge properties

Streptavidin Mut. S27a    Human Serum Albumin                   Ovalbumin             Avidin comp. Biotin.
 Le Trong et al. 2002       S.Sugio, et al., 1998           Stein , Leslie, 1990       Livnah et al 1993,
     PDB: 1N9Y                 PDB: 1BM0                        PDB: 1OVA                 PDB: 2AVI

                         Notes                      Mass (kDa)          rstoke (nm)    pIisof    pIef
    Streptavidin (SAV)   Recombinant                66                  -              6.5
    BSA                  >99% electrophoresis       66                  3.5            5.3       4.25
    Ovalbumin (OA)       Grade VII (>98% elph.)     44                  2.7            4.54      4.6
    Avidin (AV)          Heterogeneous              72/62               -              10.5
Translocation by electrophoresis

   Electrode bias set at 50 mV (or -50mV)
   pH 6, citrate, 1M KCl, 1 µg BSA/mL

   Since pore is considerably larger than proteins, at a first
   approximation we can ignore protein-pore interactions
Protein charge explored by nanopores

Valleys (50mV)                              Peaks (-50mV)
Protein charge explored by nanopores

                                                                                                           BSA

BSA is reported to have pI 4.2 in
presence of KCl

(reports that pI is reduced from 5.3
due to binding of Cl-)

Suggests importance of counterions?

                  Han, Creus, Schürmann,Lindner, Ward, Staufer, Analytical Chemistry (2008) 89:4651-4658
Spikes: pH-dependence of shape and duration

                                                                                                         BSA

Duration of blockage-events
varies with pH: longer (and
more complex) signals closer
to pI

Fewer, sharp spikes when pH
is distant from pI

Suggests time resolution is a
critical issue

                Han, Creus, Schürmann,Lindner, Ward, Staufer, Analytical Chemistry (2008) 89:4651-4658
Variety of spikes with complex fine-structure

      BSA pH3                     BSA pH6                    AV pH6                   SAV pH5

                Han, Creus, Schürmann,Lindner, Ward, Staufer, Analytical Chemistry (2008) 89:4651-4658
Time resolution

Our calculations suggest
that at pH8 BSA                                                                                           BSA
                                                                                                                BSA
translocates the 20nm pore-
length in about 2µs

Even with 100kHz
bandwidth, practical time
resolution is only 40µs

Very fast translocations will
not be resolved

Can slow down by
measuring with pH close to
pI

                 Han, Creus, Schürmann,Lindner, Ward, Staufer, Analytical Chemistry (2008) 89:4651-4658
Slowing down by pH

r
E                             I

             pH close to pI

             pH far from pI
                                  t
Protein translocation explored by nanopores

                                                                                                           BSA

BSA is reported to have pI 4.2 in
presence of KCl

(reports that pI is reduced from 5.3
due to binding of Cl-)

Very few translocations of BSA at
pH4

                  Han, Creus, Schürmann,Lindner, Ward, Staufer, Analytical Chemistry (2008) 89:4651-4658
Protein diameter measured by nanopores

                                  Pore   Protein   I (nA)   dp (nm)   ΔI (nA)   dm (nm)

                                   A       OA      10.7      21.9      0.21       7.1

                                   B       OA      10.8      22.0      0.25       7.5
     pH 6, 100mV
     OA, BSA, SAV                  C       OA      14.0      26.3      0.23       7.3

                                   D      BSA      14.0      26.4      0.31       8.6

                                   E      BSA      14.5      26.5      0.27       8.7

                                   F      BSA      15.9      28.9      0.31       8.8

                                           dOA = 7.3 nm ± 0.2 nm
                                          dBSA = 8.7 nm ± 0.1 nm
1 nm = 10 hydrogen atoms (10 Å)
Quantifying molecules by exploiting
          specific interactions of proteins
    IgG (hCG)= 4µg/ml

0   2          4        6   8   10   0   2   4     6    8   10
                Time (s)                     Time (s)

0    2         4      6     8   10
                Time (s)
Interpretation

r
E                    I

                         t
Nanopore bioassays
• The principle of the assay is general & can be applied wherever
two molecules combined give a different signal from signals of
either molecules alone
                       A+B=C
•

Titrations can be employed for
quantification (e.g. measures of affinity)

Statistical calculations: 1000 counts (C.V. 3.2%)

Counting 1000 proteins in 1ml volumes is not “zeptoM sensitivity”,
due to limitations:

       - Time: 500 counts/min (25nM antibody)
       - Affinities (for biomolecular interactions)
New methods bring surprising outcomes…

• SAV (calculated pI= 6.5) is
apparently very heterogeneous,           SAV
with both positively and
negatively-charged tetramers at
any given pH

                      SDS-PAGE gel
SAV apparently pure?
Mass Reconstruction of Streptavidin Wildtype.
        Applied Biosystems/ Sciex QTrap Mass Spectrometer:
        Electrospray Low Resolution, Positive Ion Mode
        Acetonitrile/Water (1:1) + 1%HFo
                                                   Avi          Sav

                  16430.0
                                       Sav (theory)=                  16423 Da
                                       Sav (found) =                  16430 Da
                                      Sav + Ca2+=     16470 Da
                                      Sav + 2x Ca 2+= 16510 Da
                                      Sav + 3x Ca2+ = ~16552 Da

                                              Isoelectric Focusing

                                  Lutter et al. Electrophoresis 2001, 22: 2888-2897
New methods bring surprising outcomes…

• SAV (calculated pI= 6.5) is
apparently very heterogeneous,           SAV
with both positively and
negatively-charged tetramers at
any given pH

• Charge heterogeneity?
• Binding to counterions?
Summary

•   Protein sensing using nanopores: label-free, in solution, in
    real time
    – Exquisitely sensitive: proteins analysed one-by-one
    – Diameter precisely determined with 0.2nm reproducibility
    – Charge-properties and interactions between proteins can be
      measured
    – Label-free immunoassays
    – Counting just 1000 molecules is required for accuracy, which
      could be found in tiny volumes
Questions and outlook
What are the effects of counterions?

What is the significance of the fine-structure of spikes?

Structural/ biophysical properties:
        Explore orientation of translocation
        Sequence proteins: beyond genomics?
        Protein folding (time resolution)
        Domain movements (time resolution)

Nanopore Assays:
      Protein heterogeneity
      Biomolecular interactions & affinities

 Paradigm shift (beyond DNA):
 Since nanopores are easy to use and informative, they
 may become a useful analytical tool for the biochemist
Acknowledgements

•   Canton de Neuchâtel
•   Swiss National Science Fund
•   Danish Research Agency
        for financial support

•   The staff of COMLab & the joint clean-room facility of IMT and
    CSEM for their technological support

•   Prof. Urs Staufer (now at Delft Technical University)
•   Dr Anpan Han (now in Copenhagen)
Wafer-level nanopore fabrication process

Si3N4
 SiO2

  Si

 SiO2
Si3N4
Wafer-level nanopore fabrication process

Resist
 Si3N4
  SiO2

   Si

  SiO2
 Si3N4
Wafer-level nanopore fabrication process
                 e-beam exposure

Resist
 Si3N4
  SiO2

    Si

   SiO2
  Si3N4
Resist

                optical lithography
You can also read