Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Protein Translocation Through Artificial Nanopores Marc Creus University of Basel ERBM4 Liège A WHOLE nano-world to be explored! Institute of Microtechnology (Neuchâtel) Institute of Chemistry (Neuchâtel) Dr Urs Staufer Dr Marc Creus Dr Anpan Han Prof Thomas Ward Prof Nico de Rooij
First patent application for Coulter Counter: 1949 “You cannot patent a hole!” US Patent granted: 1953, USPT 2656508 Wallace H. Coulter (1913-1998) Engineer, Inventor, Entrepreneur, Visionary
Application of Coulter Principle: Blood-Cell Counter The complete blood count or “CBC” is one of the most commonly ordered diagnostic tests worldwide. Today, ninety-eight percent of CBCs are performed on instruments using the Coulter Principle.
Micro vs Nano 10µm 1nm (e.g. diametre of a small protein, which is 10 000 x smaller than this small cell)
Since the nano-scale corresponds to the size of biological macromolecules, nanopores could be useful in biochemical analyses of proteins. ~5nm “We have friends in other fields---in biology, for instance. We physicists often look at them and say, (…) ``You should use more mathematics, like we do.'' They could answer us (…) ``What you should do in order for us to make more rapid progress is to make the electron microscope 100 times better.'' Richard Feynman, December 29th 1959 “There’s plenty of room at the bottom” http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html
Structure of DNA • Genetic data • Primary structure – Polymer of A, T, C, G • Secondary structure - B helix – Diameter 2 nm • Tertiary structure Alberts et al.
Structure of Proteins • Primary structure – Polymer of 20 amino acids • Secondary structure – α-helix, β-strands, coils • Tertiary structure • Quaternary structure – Multi protein complex, filaments • Typical diameter: 1 - 20 nm Ovalbumin Deposition: Stein , Leslie, 1990 PDB: 1OVA
Properties of macromolecules: • Surface charge: positive, neutral or negative -DNA (an acid) is usually negatively charged Acid (low) pH Basic (high) pH -Proteins can be basic or acidic and have different charges depending on the pH Alberts et al.
More properties of macromolecules: Specific interactions • Proteins are designed for recognition: antibodies, hormones, enzymes, structural proteins, toxins, etc…
How can a biochemist make use of synthetic nanopores? • Measure size, charge, structural properties and interactions of proteins, in real-time and in solution?
Process flow chart nanopore fabrication 500 nm SiO2 AZ 1518 both sides KOH etching rinsing 20 nm Si3N4 spin PMMA backside alignment oxidation optical lithography 20nm e-beam litho. RIE, stripping chip level PDMS bonding silicon Si3N4 SiO2 RIE, stripping PMMA PDMS AZ 1518
Wafer-level nanopore fabrication process PDMS lp= 20nm 25 nm Si3N4 SiO2 Si SiO2 Si3N4
Experiment setup
Measured parameters • Count the numbers of spikes per minute – Number of spikes proportional to concentration • Individual spikes – Duration: ∆t – Current change: ∆I ∆I ∆t
Four different proteins, differing in size and charge properties Streptavidin Mut. S27a Human Serum Albumin Ovalbumin Avidin comp. Biotin. Le Trong et al. 2002 S.Sugio, et al., 1998 Stein , Leslie, 1990 Livnah et al 1993, PDB: 1N9Y PDB: 1BM0 PDB: 1OVA PDB: 2AVI Notes Mass (kDa) rstoke (nm) pIisof pIef Streptavidin (SAV) Recombinant 66 - 6.5 BSA >99% electrophoresis 66 3.5 5.3 4.25 Ovalbumin (OA) Grade VII (>98% elph.) 44 2.7 4.54 4.6 Avidin (AV) Heterogeneous 72/62 - 10.5
Translocation by electrophoresis Electrode bias set at 50 mV (or -50mV) pH 6, citrate, 1M KCl, 1 µg BSA/mL Since pore is considerably larger than proteins, at a first approximation we can ignore protein-pore interactions
Protein charge explored by nanopores Valleys (50mV) Peaks (-50mV)
Protein charge explored by nanopores BSA BSA is reported to have pI 4.2 in presence of KCl (reports that pI is reduced from 5.3 due to binding of Cl-) Suggests importance of counterions? Han, Creus, Schürmann,Lindner, Ward, Staufer, Analytical Chemistry (2008) 89:4651-4658
Spikes: pH-dependence of shape and duration BSA Duration of blockage-events varies with pH: longer (and more complex) signals closer to pI Fewer, sharp spikes when pH is distant from pI Suggests time resolution is a critical issue Han, Creus, Schürmann,Lindner, Ward, Staufer, Analytical Chemistry (2008) 89:4651-4658
Variety of spikes with complex fine-structure BSA pH3 BSA pH6 AV pH6 SAV pH5 Han, Creus, Schürmann,Lindner, Ward, Staufer, Analytical Chemistry (2008) 89:4651-4658
Time resolution Our calculations suggest that at pH8 BSA BSA BSA translocates the 20nm pore- length in about 2µs Even with 100kHz bandwidth, practical time resolution is only 40µs Very fast translocations will not be resolved Can slow down by measuring with pH close to pI Han, Creus, Schürmann,Lindner, Ward, Staufer, Analytical Chemistry (2008) 89:4651-4658
Slowing down by pH r E I pH close to pI pH far from pI t
Protein translocation explored by nanopores BSA BSA is reported to have pI 4.2 in presence of KCl (reports that pI is reduced from 5.3 due to binding of Cl-) Very few translocations of BSA at pH4 Han, Creus, Schürmann,Lindner, Ward, Staufer, Analytical Chemistry (2008) 89:4651-4658
Protein diameter measured by nanopores Pore Protein I (nA) dp (nm) ΔI (nA) dm (nm) A OA 10.7 21.9 0.21 7.1 B OA 10.8 22.0 0.25 7.5 pH 6, 100mV OA, BSA, SAV C OA 14.0 26.3 0.23 7.3 D BSA 14.0 26.4 0.31 8.6 E BSA 14.5 26.5 0.27 8.7 F BSA 15.9 28.9 0.31 8.8 dOA = 7.3 nm ± 0.2 nm dBSA = 8.7 nm ± 0.1 nm 1 nm = 10 hydrogen atoms (10 Å)
Quantifying molecules by exploiting specific interactions of proteins IgG (hCG)= 4µg/ml 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time (s) Time (s) 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time (s)
Interpretation r E I t
Nanopore bioassays • The principle of the assay is general & can be applied wherever two molecules combined give a different signal from signals of either molecules alone A+B=C • Titrations can be employed for quantification (e.g. measures of affinity) Statistical calculations: 1000 counts (C.V. 3.2%) Counting 1000 proteins in 1ml volumes is not “zeptoM sensitivity”, due to limitations: - Time: 500 counts/min (25nM antibody) - Affinities (for biomolecular interactions)
New methods bring surprising outcomes… • SAV (calculated pI= 6.5) is apparently very heterogeneous, SAV with both positively and negatively-charged tetramers at any given pH SDS-PAGE gel
SAV apparently pure? Mass Reconstruction of Streptavidin Wildtype. Applied Biosystems/ Sciex QTrap Mass Spectrometer: Electrospray Low Resolution, Positive Ion Mode Acetonitrile/Water (1:1) + 1%HFo Avi Sav 16430.0 Sav (theory)= 16423 Da Sav (found) = 16430 Da Sav + Ca2+= 16470 Da Sav + 2x Ca 2+= 16510 Da Sav + 3x Ca2+ = ~16552 Da Isoelectric Focusing Lutter et al. Electrophoresis 2001, 22: 2888-2897
New methods bring surprising outcomes… • SAV (calculated pI= 6.5) is apparently very heterogeneous, SAV with both positively and negatively-charged tetramers at any given pH • Charge heterogeneity? • Binding to counterions?
Summary • Protein sensing using nanopores: label-free, in solution, in real time – Exquisitely sensitive: proteins analysed one-by-one – Diameter precisely determined with 0.2nm reproducibility – Charge-properties and interactions between proteins can be measured – Label-free immunoassays – Counting just 1000 molecules is required for accuracy, which could be found in tiny volumes
Questions and outlook What are the effects of counterions? What is the significance of the fine-structure of spikes? Structural/ biophysical properties: Explore orientation of translocation Sequence proteins: beyond genomics? Protein folding (time resolution) Domain movements (time resolution) Nanopore Assays: Protein heterogeneity Biomolecular interactions & affinities Paradigm shift (beyond DNA): Since nanopores are easy to use and informative, they may become a useful analytical tool for the biochemist
Acknowledgements • Canton de Neuchâtel • Swiss National Science Fund • Danish Research Agency for financial support • The staff of COMLab & the joint clean-room facility of IMT and CSEM for their technological support • Prof. Urs Staufer (now at Delft Technical University) • Dr Anpan Han (now in Copenhagen)
Wafer-level nanopore fabrication process Si3N4 SiO2 Si SiO2 Si3N4
Wafer-level nanopore fabrication process Resist Si3N4 SiO2 Si SiO2 Si3N4
Wafer-level nanopore fabrication process e-beam exposure Resist Si3N4 SiO2 Si SiO2 Si3N4 Resist optical lithography
You can also read