PRE-ELECTION REPORT 2019 - SOUTHLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
From the CHIEF EXECUTIVE Greetings and thank you for your interest in standing up for Southland District. It’s an exciting time to be a leader in your community. You have a real opportunity to influence positive change. Southland District Council has just gone through its six-yearly Representation Review, and the Local Government Commission’s determination paves the way for a new community board structure which will enable District-wide coverage of representation at local decision-making level. What this means is that communities will have greater ability to chart their own course into the future, with Southland District Council a supportive partner in the process. The community-led development approach is based on the premise of small council-big community, with more decision-making being devolved to communities themselves, rather than being driven by Council. 2
The new style of community governance will be carried We have commissioned a great deal of research to out by the communities themselves, rather than for help us understand the likely future makeup of our them or to them. We see this as a great opportunity communities, including demographic trends, climate to connect community with Council and Council change and other potential disruptors, and we are with community. taking stock of our community facilities to help us to establish minimum levels of service in consultation As an elected representative you will support, advocate with our communities. The purpose of this is to ensure for and provide leadership to your community. Your consistency of quality experiences right throughout work will be shaped by a community board plan that the District, including in our parks, reserves and is being developed by your current community board playgrounds. in conjunction with Council’s community partnership leaders. All this future-focused work is necessary because we already know of some of the key challenges that These plans take a strategic, long-term view of your lie ahead. community’s future needs and will contribute to Council’s planning and policy framework, helping We have a massive amount of infrastructure that is Council to tailor the services it provides to meet your reaching the end of its useful life and coming up for community’s needs. replacement in the next 10 years, and we expect to see continued increasing costs from higher government The Stewart Island/Rakiura service sustainability review standards in relation to water and land use. These is a great example of the sort of strategic thinking issues are discussed later in this report. promoted within the new governance framework. It focuses on the affordability and sustainability of The District has limited ability to pay for this within the Council-delivered activities on the island, with the aim current ratepayer pool, and we will have to have hard of providing a consistent, sustainable level of service discussions with communities about how and where to the island for many years to come. This work is well we prioritise spending. advanced and, once completed, could form the basis of similar reviews throughout the entire District. I cannot emphasise enough the importance of communities’ voices being heard during these crucial Establishing consistent levels of service and providing discussions, which will go a long way towards shaping these services in the most efficient ways have been our communities in the future. a particular focus for Council in the past few years. The reorganisation of our services and assets team in This is a call to arms for people considering standing in 2018/2019 to provide gains in project delivery is just the coming local elections. Your community needs you one example of Council’s commitment to the cause. now, more than ever. Thank you again for your interest. STEVE RURU 3
SOUTHLAND DISTRICT AND ITS CHALLENGES There are 31 towns, townships, villages and settlements in Southland District. By population, the biggest is Winton (population 2,211), followed by Te Anau (1914) and Riverton/Aparima (1431). There are also more than 160 small rural localities in the District. Southland District has affordable housing and low unemployment compared with the national and regional averages. The median wage in Southland District is also slightly higher than the national average. However, Southland District has one of New Zealand’s least diversified economies. This is a key factor in the loss of youth, who look for high-quality jobs compatible with their qualifications. Trends in the dairy industry have been a recent challenge for Southland District’s economy, with low global prices generating significant financial pressure for dairy farmers. By contrast, the tourism industry is experiencing significant growth, which presents both opportunities and challenges for the Southland District. Council’s biggest challenge remains the widening gap between the rising cost of providing core services and the small population able to help fund it. Southland District Council is having conversations with ratepayers about this and many other issues relating to delivery of services and infrastructure. 5
AGEING INFRASTRUCTURE This is a growing problem for Southland District Council, as it is for local authorities throughout New Zealand and around the world. Council manages $1.5 billion of public assets, The bridge issue will need to be addressed in including roads, footpaths, bridges, water and Council’s next Long Term Plan 2021-2031. sewage treatment plants, stormwater drains, water structures, buildings and community In the meantime Council has approved facilities. A huge amount of it requires unbudgeted expenditure totalling $3 million maintenance, repair or replacement in the to help resolve some of the shortfall in the next 10 years. required bridge replacement programme. Of this, $1.47 million will come from Council and Between 2018 and 2028 we expect to spend the balance from the NZ Transport Agency. over $250 million on new or replacement infrastructure, and over $351 million on Bridges are just one example of the tension operational costs such as maintenance. that exists for Council when considering infrastructure maintenance or Bridges are a topical example of the kind of replacement costs. infrastructure challenges Council is experiencing now. The District has a relatively small pool of ratepayers and there is limited ability to pay There are more than 850 bridges in the District, for it all. Prioritisation of spending is one many of them ageing timber structures. They are of the biggest challenges facing Southland deteriorating rapidly and could pose a serious District Council. It has to be balanced against safety risk to users if no action was taken. a broad range of factors, not the least of which are safety concerns and community Of the 850 bridges, 171 bridges need to be expectations. replaced or rationalised in the next 12 years and a further 22 in the eight years beyond that. Serious discussions will need to be had about Based on the current allocated funding there is how we deal with these issues. They will not a significant financial deficit to replace all these be easy conversations to have. bridges within the next 12 years. 7
THREE WATERS REVIEW In the aftermath of the Havelock North drinking water contamination in 2016, central government launched a review of the regulation and supply of drinking water, wastewater and stormwater (three waters). The aim is to better support New Zealand’s prosperity, health, safety and environment. In Southland District, three waters assets and services are owned and delivered by Southland District Council. The government’s policy proposals have passed through a stakeholder consultation phase and an announcement on the new regulatory environment is imminent. It is expected that higher standards for treatment of drinking water and wastewater discharges and overflows will be among the changes announced, and that these will significantly increase the costs for councils seeking resource consents under the new regime. 8
COMMUNITY The Local Government Commission has determined the following arrangements be in place for the 2019 elections: GOVERNANCE 1 mayor, elected at large 9 community boards: Fiordland 12 councillors, elected in 5 wards: Northern (3 subdivisions: Parawa-Fairlight, West Mararoa Waimea Dome, Mid Dome) Southland District Council is required by law to review its (3 councillors) Oreti (3 subdivisions: representation arrangements at least every six years, to Winton Wallacetown Hokonui, Midlands, Ma- ensure its governance structure is efficient and effective, (3 councillors) karewa) delivers equity of representation and keeps local input and Waiau Aparima involvement at its centre. Ardlussa (3 councillors) Tuatapere Te Waewae Waihopai Toetoe The latest review was carried out in 2018. It identified some Wallace Takitimu (2 councillors) gaps in representation in certain geographical areas within Oraka Aparima the District and, as a result, boundaries have been changed to Stewart Island Rakiura enable District-wide coverage of community boards. (1 councillor) Waihopai Toetoe Stewart Island/Rakiura 9
COMMUNITY FUTURES In 30 years the communities we live in will look a lot different than they do now. We don’t have a crystal ball but The population projections show in the past two years we have that all townships will see an commissioned solid research to increase in people aged over 65, try to predict what challenges while a number of townships will our communities will face in the see a decline in those aged under future, including research by BERL 15 and people aged 15 to 64 years (Business and Economic of age. Research Ltd). An ageing population presents Analysing this data will help us to challenges for Council as this have crucial conversations with will have an impact on both the our communities about future kinds of services required by our infrastructure, assets and services, communities and the ability to where they might be provided, to pay for them. what level, and how we pay for them. BERL projects that the populations of many of the District’s The information gathered is a communities will increase between building block for our next Long 2013 and 2043. Term Plan, in 2021. The largest growth is expected in BERL’s research projects the Te Anau and Winton, with each population of Southland District town increasing in population by will increase by 6,400 between between 400 and 500 people. At 2013 and 2043, from 30,300 to the other end Monowai, Nightcaps, 36,700, but that the number of Riversdale, Tokanui and Otautau are people aged over 65 years will projected to either maintain their more than double in that time, 2013 population through to 2043 or from 4,100 to 8,600. see a small decline. 10
Southland District Council is responsible for 1,261 hectares of open spaces, including parks, reserves and other recreational areas. These spaces are vital to the wellbeing of the communities around them. They increase pride in the region and encourage people to live and play here. Southland District Council has begun a long-term project to improve and better manage these spaces for the enjoyment of residents and visitors alike. The work includes researching resident population trends and visitor numbers to better understand the future needs of people in Southland District, and to establish consistent levels of service across all Council facilities. 11
Council spends more than $30 million a year to maintain the District’s 5,000km roading network, about half of which is funded by the NZ Transport Agency. It is the most expensive activity Council manages. Roading will account for around $328 million, more than half (59%) of Southland District Council’s total operational spending, over the 10 years of the 2018-2028 Long Term Plan. (Council’s roading activity includes bridges and footpaths, as well as water structures such as wharves and jetties.) To ensure that we keep rates affordable we need to continue looking for innovative ways to prioritise spending on the roads that are the most important to our communities in terms of their economic and social needs. This also means that lower-use roads may not have the same level of maintenance as they have seen in the past. 12
TOURISM Southland District is blessed to have many jewels in its tourism crown, making it an increasingly popular destination for visitors wanting to experience first hand the natural beauty of our coastal landscape. The Southern Scenic Route remains a Managing rising visitor numbers highly marketable starting point for while preserving the integrity and tourists, who are able to visit a range authenticity of our wonderful places of stunning and unique destinations is a key challenge for Council. We including Milford Sound/Piopiotahi, are working in partnership with a Stewart Island/Rakiura, Curio Bay and wide range of agencies, both locally the Catlins, as well as venturing inland and nationally, to ensure adequate for a different offering of southern infrastructure and systems are in place experiences. to cope with the rising visitor numbers without placing unfair demands on our Visitor numbers and spending are residents and ratepayers. trending up in Southland District. Nearly a million people flock to the A 2018 report based on monthly tiny hub at Milford Sound/Piopiotahi regional tourism estimates showed every year. The number is expected to that guest nights were up 7.3% to reach 1.2 million by 2023. The Milford 785,009 in the year to November Opportunities Project is an example of 2017, and the number of Airbnb non- Council’s involvement in a multi-agency commercial accommodation was up partnership designed to respond to 64.7% to 420 properties. this influx. International visitor spend in the Council has managed almost District was up 10.5% to $180 million $6 million in successful applications for 2017, while domestic visitor spend to the government’s Tourism was up 8.4% to $136 million. The total Infrastructure Fund and Provincial spend was up 9.6% to $316 million for Growth Fund for tourism-related the year. infrastructure and strategic community projects in Stewart Island/Rakiura, Te Anau, Lumsden and the Southern Scenic Route. 13
SHARED SERVICES Southland District Council continues to work The new agency (SRDA) was the result of the with other councils in Southland and Clutha Southland Regional Development Strategy District Council to make efficiencies and (SoRDS), which was initiated by the Southland cost savings on behalf of ratepayers through Mayoral Forum and launched in 2015 with shared service arrangements. the primary aim of increasing Southland’s population by 10,000 people by 2025. Emergency Management Southland, which manages region-wide civil defence There have been more than 50 inter-council preparedness and emergencies, is an collaborative projects in the past 19 years, example of an effective shared service. among them WasteNet Southland, Road Safety Southland, the Southland Regional Venture Southland was another high-profile Heritage Committee, some environmental shared service, until it was absorbed into health services and the charter of the new Southland Regional Development understanding with Ngāi Tahu. Agency structure in 2019. 14
COUNCIL’S FINANCIAL REPORT The following financial statements cover the past three years, the current year and the next three years. Pages 16 - 24 They show how Council is managing its finances in comparison with the Financial Strategy adopted as part of the Long Term Plan 2018-2028. The financial information brings together figures previously published in our Long Term Plan 2018-2028, Annual Plans and Annual Reports as well as updated financials, based on the latest forecast information. While this is not an audited report, much of the information contained in it has been audited. The 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 financial information was audited in the respective Annual Reports. 2018/2019 is based on Council’s forecast financial position for the year. The 2020/2021, 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 financial and major projects information comes from the Long Term Plan 2018-2028. The current year is based on the 2019/2020 Annual Plan, which has not been audited. We are happy to answer any questions you may have in relation to the financial projections. 15
Financial Tables 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 numbers are from Council’s audited Annual Reports. 2018/2019 numbers are forecast results for the year ended 30 June 2019. 2019/2020 numbers are from Council’s 2019/2020 Annual Plan. 2020/2021, 2021/2022, 2022/2023 numbers are from the Long Term Plan 2018-2028 and have not been updated. Balance Sheet The Balance Sheet shows the value of assets owned by Council. It also shows how Council has funded the acquisition of those assets. Council can fund its assets either by borrowing or from equity Council has built up over the years. Council’s main asset is its property, plant and equipment, for example, roads, water and wastewater treatment plants. Balance Sheet Actual Actual Estimate Annual Plan Forecast Forecast Forecast 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) TOTAL EQUITY 1,484,611 1,537,706 1,564,228 1,588,686 1,596,452 1,626,863 1,660,621 Current assets Cash and cash equivalents 9,773 10,885 15,372 (3,173) 1,951 1,961 - Current financial assets 10,271 7,840 779 314 334 334 334 Other current assets 9,556 8,553 7,278 4,718 7,532 7,592 7,880 29,600 27,278 23,429 1,859 9,817 9,887 8,214 Non-current assets Property, plant and equipment 1,450,334 1,505,886 1,538,590 1,582,338 1,591,380 1,621,675 1,656,999 Non-current financial assets 4 3 825 607 4 4 4 Other non-current assets 15,905 15,700 13,199 12,863 13,998 14,146 14,964 1,466,243 1,521,589 1,552,614 1,595,808 1,605,382 1,635,825 1,671,967 16
Balance Sheet Actual Actual Estimate Annual Plan Forecast Forecast Forecast 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) TOTAL ASSETS 1,495,843 1,548,867 1,576,043 1,597,667 1,615,199 1,645,712 1,680,181 Current Liabilities Borrowings - - - - 155 168 315 Other current liabilities 11,148 11,098 11,757 8,930 11,028 11,285 11,391 11,148 11,098 11,757 8,930 11,183 11,453 11,706 Non-current liabilities Borrowings - - - - 7,497 7,329 7,787 Other non-current liabilities 84 63 58 51 67 67 67 84 63 58 51 7,564 7,396 7,854 TOTAL LIABILITIES 11,232 11,161 11,815 8,981 18,747 18,849 19,560 NET ASSETS 1,484,611 1,537,706 1,564,228 1,588,686 1,596,452 1,626,863 1,660,621 17
Funding Impact Statement The Funding Impact Statement shows how Council intends to fund its activities, both operational and capital, in the future. Funds are applied to either operating expenditure covering the ongoing costs required for Council to operate, for example, electricity, insurance and staff costs, or to capital expenditure on major assets that will last for a long period of time, for example, water treatment plants and roads. Funding Impact Statement Actual Actual Estimate Annual Plan Forecast Forecast Forecast 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) Sources of operating funding General rates, uniform annual general charges, rates penalties 14,233 14,817 16,623 17,571 18,010 18,208 18,610 Targeted rates 29,354 30,466 30,153 30,840 31,913 32,474 33,481 Subsidies and grants for operating purposes 6,649 7,152 8,090 6,103 6,135 6,281 6,369 Fees and charges, and targeted rates for water supply 3,533 3,859 3,706 3,734 3,847 3,967 4,016 Interest and dividends from investments 532 604 370 68 73 75 77 Local authorities fuel tax, fines, infringements fees and other receipts¹ 8,512 8,644 6,072 5,187 4,488 4,251 4,769 Total operating funding 62,813 65,542 65,014 63,503 64,466 65,256 67,322 Applications of operating funding Payments to staff and suppliers 44,858 46,741 48,199 48,133 46,903 47,677 49,369 Finance cost 22 30 22 22 304 299 306 Other operating funding applications 4,020 4,475 4,096 5,252 4,228 4,278 4,339 Total applications of operating funding 48,900 51,246 52,317 53,407 51,435 52,254 54,014 Surplus (deficit) of operating funding 13,913 14,296 12,697 10,096 13,031 13,002 13,308 Sources of capital funding Subsidies and grants for capital purposes 7,014 12,726 9,398 10,806 7,827 7,641 8,436 Development and financial contributions 121 28 16 368 46 - - Increase (decrease) in debt - - - - (150) (155) 605 Gross proceeds from sale of assets 216 395 168 123 84 85 153 Lump sum contributions - - - - - - - Total sources of capital funding 7,351 13,149 9,582 11,297 7,807 7,571 9,194 18
Funding Impact Statement Actual Actual Estimate Annual Plan Forecast Forecast Forecast 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) Applications of capital funding Capital expenditure - to meet additional demand 138 1,031 962 4,988 79 - - - to improve the level of service 3,981 10,593 6,664 12,967 3,719 5,446 2,952 - to replace existing assets 13,668 16,968 19,369 19,736 15,067 15,317 21,334 Increase (decrease) in reserves 3,253 7,460 (1,443) (1,130) 1,901 2 1,112 Increase (decrease) in investments 224 (8,607) (3,273) (15,168) 72 (192) (2,896) Total applications of capital funding 21,264 27,445 22,279 21,393 20,838 20,573 22,502 Surplus (deficit) of capital funding (13,913) (14,296) (12,697) (10,096) (13,031) (13,002) (13,308) ¹ Includes all other operating funding from sources not identified above Financial Strategy Council’s Financial Strategy balances a requirement to maintain infrastructure to acceptable standards while recognising the burden that rate increases place on ratepayers. Council wants to give certainty to ratepayers about future rate movements and does this by imposing a maximum rate increase cap, of the Local Government Cost Index plus 2%. Council aims to keep rates well below this cap, by carefully managing costs, the services we provide and by always looking for more efficient ways to deliver our services. Council will also look for other sources of funding, including maximising our returns from forestry. It is important that Council maintains a healthy balance sheet with low to modest levels of debt until we have a clearer picture of how we might best meet the long-term infrastructure needs of our communities. In the past there has not been a need to use external debt. In coming years Council is expecting to borrow externally to fund a number of significant capital projects. Council has set a limit on debt of 100 percent of revenue, which it believes is conservative and will provide the ability to fund any unforeseen events, such as a natural disaster or emergency. 19
Compliance with the Financial Strategy Rates as a % of revenue Year Limit Rates Compliance 2016/2017 67% 60% Yes 2017/2018 67% 57% Yes 2018/2019 70% 64% Yes *Rates increases differ to what is published in the relevant Annual Plans and Long Term Plans due to actual rates collected being used for all years. *2018/2019 revenue is based on estimated financial statements. Rates Increase % Year CPI LGCI Limit Rates Increase Compliance 2016/2017 1.40% 1.50% 3.50% 3.03% Yes 2017/2018 1.80% 1.80% 3.80% 3.80% Yes 2018/2019 1.80% 2.00% 4.00% 3.98% Yes *Rates increases are limited to LGCI +2.0% in accordance with the Long Term Plan 2015-2025 and 2018-2028. *Rates increases differ to what is published in the relevant Annual Plans and Long Term Plans due to actual rates collected being used for all years. *CPI and LGCI rates are as per the BERL Forecasts of Price Level Change Adjustors - 2017 update published in September 2017. This document was used in compilation of the 2018-2028 LTP. Borrowings Limit Year Total Revenue Total Borrowings Borrowing Limit Compliance ($000) ($000) ($000) 2016/2017 72,129 - 72,129 Yes 2017/2018 79,706 - 79,706 Yes 2018/2019 72,942 - 72,942 Yes *Borrowings for all years are limited to 100% of Council’s total revenue in accordance with the Long Term Plan 2015-2025 and 2018-2028. *2018/2019 revenue and borrowings are based on estimated financial statements. 20
Accounting Method When preparing its financial information Council applies Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP). One of the key principles of GAAP is to record assets at a fair value. Fair value is either an estimation of market value of assets where it exists, for example, forestry assets, or the cost in current dollar terms to replace certain assets where there is no readily available market value, for example, roads. Some lesser value assets are valued at historical cost. For more information refer to Council’s accounting policies on pages 307 – 317 of Council’s Long Term Plan 2018-2028. Major Projects The table below shows the major projects scheduled for the current year and the three financial years following elections. Although the projects identified from 2021-2023 are based on Council’s Long Term Plan 2018-28, additional notes have been added to the project narration where Council staff are aware of potential changes. Some have yet to be formally approved by Council. For the purpose of this report major projects include all planned projects over $200,000 in any single year. The table shows each project’s annual cost for the four years. Project 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) Council Buildings/Property COUNCIL OFFICES AND DEPOTS BUILDING UPGRADE 218 5,250 To refurbish and upgrade the Invercargill SDC Office Building. TE ANAU LIBRARY 483 Upgrade to library potentially incorporating the Te Anau office. This project is expected to be moved beyond 2021/2022 in the 2021-2031 Long Term Plan. Council Facilities STEWART ISLAND/RAKIURA - GOLDEN BAY WHARF 234 Initial funds to upgrade the coastal infrastructure at Golden Bay and the link to Halfmoon Bay. This project will be subject to obtaining additional external (TIF) funding. STEWART ISLAND/RAKIURA - ULVA ISLAND JETTY 260 Initial funds to upgrade the coastal infrastructure at Ulva Island. This project will be subject to obtaining additional external (TIF) funding. 21
Project 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) District Support IT EQUIPMENT RENEWAL 467 Replacement servers and other hardware to update the IT environment. CORE SYSTEMS REVIEW 557 557 Review dated applications against future requirements for Council. PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE 241 Replacing the current phone system with a “Telephony as a Service” system as well as a call centre solution. Parks and Reserves DISTRICT RESERVES 1,003 502 Capital development relating to the open spaces strategy. Detail of program yet to be developed. Public Conveniences RIVERTON TOILETS 342 Princess Street Toilet Facilities Upgrade. Stormwater WINTON - RETICULATION REPLACEMENT 810 Year 2 of reticulation replacement in Great North Road and De Joux Road. Water Supply EASTERN BUSH - WATER SUPPLY UPGRADE 250 Upgrades to the water treatment plant to meet water drinking standards. Work on this project has been delayed to ensure that it meets emerging drinking water stds. Approx. $1.3m is expected to be carried forward to 2020/2021. MANAPOURI – UPGRADE RE TURBIDITY 359 524 Initial upgrade of Manapouri water treatment plant to comply with Drinking Water Standards. 22
Project 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) OTAUTAU - REPLACEMENT OF MAINS 475 Year 1 of 2 for a planned replacement of watermains in the main street. Future costs are forecast to be $475,000. RIVERTON – ADDITIONAL UV DISINFECTION 256 Additional treatment of water post Havelock North and ensure continued compliance with Drinking Water Standards. An additional $256,000 is also expected to be incurred in 2020/2021. TE ANAU – WATER MAIN RENEWAL 509 Year 1 of 2 for a planned replacement of watermains in Quintin Drive, Homer Street and Mokoroa Street. Future costs are forecast to be $500,000. TE ANAU – WATER LATERALS 1,068 Renewal of laterals ahead of time and switchboards/monitoring. WINTON - REPLACEMENT OF RISING MAINS 600 Planned replacement of watermains at Brandon Street and part of the Winton- Dipton Highway. Wastewater TE ANAU SEWERAGE SCHEME UPGRADE 12,820 Year 1 of construction to upgrade the capacity of the Te Anau Sewerage Scheme using a sub-surface drip irrigation method for disposal to land. Due to Councils decision making process and new consent requirements, part of the project has been moved to 2020/21. This is expected to total $8.6million. TOKANUI – TREATMENT UPGRADE 200 Initial funds for any treatment upgrade pending outcome of current resource consent application. Further costs are anticipated to be incurred in future years, however the extent of these costs are currently unknown. 23
Project 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) RIVERSDALE - TREATMENT UPGRADE STAGE 2 300 1,718 Proposed land purchase for construction of rapid infiltration basins for upgrade as required by the current resource consent. Due to delays, project costs of $385,000 are also expected to be incurred in 2020/21, these have been previously budgeted for. RIVERTON – DESLUDGING 305 Desludging of the sewerage treatment pond at Riverton Rocks. LUMSDEN - DESLUDGING 253 Desludging of the sewerage treatment pond at Lumsden. Airport TE ANAU AIRPORT MANAPOURI 326 Main runway and apron resealing. This table is not a full list of Council’s projects. A full list can be found on pages 330 – 345 of Council’s Long Term Plan 2018-2028. 24
You can also read