Pakistan Looks East: Why Pakistan is Turning from Washington to Beijing for Defense Equipment By Shane Mason - Avascent
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Pakistan Looks East: Why Pakistan is Turning from Washington to Beijing for Defense Equipment By Shane Mason WHITE PAPER | JULY 2018 avascent.com DC | LONDON | PARIS | OTTAWA | TOKYO
Since 9/11, the United States has provided over $22.8 billion in overt security aid to Pakistan, and another $10 billion in economic aid.1 Pakistani Defense Spending by Account $12 The logic for military assistance to Pakistan has been Source: Avascent compelling. Pakistan permits the Pentagon to supply American troops in Afghanistan through Karachi, allowing the US to $10 conduct drone strikes in the western part of the country, and its Army remains the most stable institution in a country with over 120 nuclear weapons and countless terrorist groups.2 In $8 addition, Pakistan has used some of these funds to procure US $ BILLIONS US defense equipment, particularly aircraft. The Air Force, for example, has spent at least $2.6 billion to field an inventory $6 of 86 F-16 fighter aircraft from Lockheed Martin, 45 of which received mid-life upgrades in 2012. $4 At the same time, Pakistan gives safe-haven to groups like the Taliban and Haqqani Network that have killed thousands in Afghanistan.3 Osama bin Laden was hiding in Abbottabad in $2 the years before he was killed by American special forces, while Mullah Omar, the former head of the Taliban, is believed to $0 have died in Karachi.4 Pakistan is both essential to US efforts in Afghanistan and a reason why those efforts have been 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 unsuccessful.5 Despite the contradictions in the relationship, the Bush and Obama administrations decided that aid would n Procurement n R&D n Personnel n O&M continue. Ultimately, access to the Pakistan Army was considered more important than its support for the Afghan insurgency. With his first tweet of 2018, President Trump overturned two decades of US policy toward Pakistan.6 The President announced, “The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools. They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more!” Several days later, the State Department confirmed that the United States was suspending all security aid, totaling over $200 million, to Pakistan.7 The move accelerated what was already a deteriorating relationship between Washington and Islamabad by the time President Trump took office. Nevertheless, the aid freeze marks a new chapter in bilateral ties, with implications for US regional interests and the position of American firms in Pakistan’s defense market. 2
Impact of US Aid on Pakistani Defense Pakistani Procurement Before and After US Aid Freeze Procurement $3.5 American military aid has been used by Pakistan to import weapons from US firms. In addition to the Air Force’s $3.0 fleet of F-16s, the Army’s main attack helicopter remains the AH-1 Cobra from Textron’s Bell Helicopters. Likewise, $2.5 US $ BILLIONS Pakistan’s Navy flies seven Lockheed Martin P-3 Orion patrol aircraft which it purchased in 2005 for an estimated $970 $2.0 million. American assistance accounted for 20 percent of Pakistani defense spending since 2011, an annual average $1.5 of $1.2 billion. $1.0 US assistance has also cleared budgetary space for Pakistan to import weapons from other countries and fund military Source: Avascent $0.5 operations. Over the past two decades, Islamabad expanded 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 its ballistic missile program, developed a nuclear-capable submarine-launched cruise missile, and procured a second tranche of JF-17 fighter aircraft from China. It also launched n Pakistan’s Procurement Budget n US Contribution a campaign against the Pakistani Taliban beginning in 2014 which significantly reduced terrorism, and last year raised military pay by ten percent.8 Future Scenarios for US Aid to Pakistan Future Pakistani Defense Procurement Based on Different Aid Levels The future of US aid will have a significant impact on $4.0 Pakistan’s ability to invest in its military. The extent of the impact on procurement hinges on the extent to which $3.5 President Trump is involved in Pakistan policy, the level of US commitment to Afghanistan over time, and whether $3.0 US $ BILLIONS Pakistan continues to view militants as assets rather than liabilities. Whether the current suspension is permanent $2.5 remains to be seen. Given President Trump’s approach to foreign aid and Washington’s frustration with Pakistan, $2.0 an enduring cut-off is a possibility. In terms of Pakistan’s ability to import defense equipment, the impact will be most $1.5 painful in the short term. Without US aid, Islamabad’s Source: Avascent procurement budget will be ten percent lower in the next $1.0 five years than originally forecast. Avascent estimates that 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 under this “zero-option” that Pakistan will allocate $26.7 billion to procurement through 2028. n Pakistan Changes Course n Glide Path n Zero Option However, the logistical necessity of supplying US troops in Afghanistan may convince the administration to cut off some, but not all, security assistance. This would be a 3
return to the strategy developed during the Obama administration, in which a “glide-path” approach to assistance would slowly reduce our financial Pakistan’s Alternatives Amid commitments to Pakistan. Aid could be decreased gradually over time if the Economic Uncertainty US decides to scale back its role in The aid suspension comes at an Afghanistan, conditioning a greater inopportune time for Pakistan, which share of reimbursements to Pakistan faces its most precarious economic on Islamabad’s approach to the outlook in years. Economic growth is Haqqani Network. The House version expected to slow for the first time since of the FY2019 National Defense 2015. Moreover, Pakistan’s current Authorization Act (NDAA), for example, account deficit stands at $14 billion, stipulates that half of the $700 million over 5 percent of GDP, while its foreign allocated to Pakistan would be withheld exchange reserves have dwindled to if it fails to deny safe-haven to $9.6 billion, enough to cover only two the Haqqanis.9 months of imports.10 In a move seen as paving the way for an IMF loan after The most significant change could occur national elections on July 25, the in the unlikely event Pakistan were country’s central bank has devalued to completely reorient its foreign policy, the rupee three times since December abandon the practice of using terrorist 2017.11 A weaker currency makes groups as instruments of foreign policy, imports more expensive, further and pursue the Haqqani Network and constraining Islamabad’s ability to buy Afghan Taliban operating from its soil. defense equipment and spare parts in Such a shift would likely trigger the US dollars. release of hundreds of millions of dollars authorized to Pakistan by the US Congress Given negative trends in its relationship each year. Avascent estimates that with the United States, a depreciating Pakistan’s procurement spending under rupee, and its untenable foreign exchange these conditions for the next ten years position, Pakistan has already begun would increase 36 percent from the reaching out to other countries for “zero-option,” and exceed $36.3 billion. support, particularly China. Pakistan has While such a shift is unlikely, it received over $5 billion in bilateral and Without US aid, highlights what Pakistan is willing to commercial loans from China this fiscal surrender in exchange for its current year, including a $1 billion loan in early Islamabad’s policy towards militant safe-havens. July.12 In addition to the China-Pakistan procurement budget Economic Corridor (CPEC) – a package of infrastructure projects in Pakistan funded will be ten percent by Chinese loans worth an estimated lower in the next $62 billion – Pakistan has also turned to Beijing as a source of defense five years than imports.13 Over the next decade, Beijing originally forecast. will become the single most important arms supplier for the Pakistani military. 4
Given negative trends in its relationship with the United States, a depreciating rupee, and its untenable foreign exchange position, Pakistan has already begun reaching out to other countries for support, particularly China. Pakistan may have difficultly financing some of its costly Rupee Depreciating to Record Lows (2017-2018) defense imports from China. Along with JF-17 and J-10 105 fighter aircraft worth over $5.3 billion, Pakistan has also signed deals for eight Type 41 submarines for over $5 billion and four Type 054 frigates worth $1.4 billion. Given fiscal 110 USD / PKR constraints, Islamabad will have few good options. If Pakistan applies for an IMF loan to prevent a currency crisis, as 115 it is expected to do later this summer, it will be subject to conditions on government spending and transparency, 120 including details on how the country funds CPEC. Greater Source: International Monetary Fund transparency may jeopardize Chinese and Pakistani 125 interests in a $62 billion project with the full, public support NOV MAY OCT JUL AUG SEP DEC JAN FEB MAR APR JUN of President Xi Jinping. At the very least, Islamabad would be hard-pressed to justify its submarine modernization program, for example, when it is receiving loans from the international community.14 Chinese Firms Dominate Pakistani Procurement Programs China is not Pakistan’s only alternative to the United States. $2.5 Turkey and Russia have also emerged as partners. Pakistan has finalized contracts with various Turkish firms such as $2.0 STM to upgrade the Navy’s three Khalid-class (Agosta 90B) submarines and provide four MilGEM corvettes for over $1 US $ BILLIONS $1.5 billion, and Turkish Aerospace Industries for 30 T129 ATAK attack helicopters. Overcoming decades of distrust dating $1.0 back to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, Pakistan purchased four Mi-35 helicopters from Russia in 2015 for $153 million.15 Despite the symbolism of the helicopter sale, $0.5 Moscow will likely tread carefully before seeking to enter Source: Avascent Pakistan’s defense market for fear of upsetting India, the most $0.0 important destination for Russian defense exports. 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 n All Other Procurement n J-10 Fighter Aircraft n Type 054 Frigates n Type 41 Yuan-class Submarines n JF-17 Fighter Aircraft n Opportunity Space 5
Outlook for American Firms Along with a devalued rupee which will make imports more expensive, the Trump administration’s decision to freeze military aid will make US firms was awarded a $30 million contract to less competitive in Pakistan’s defense upgrade the avionics on 11 C-130Es and market. American defense platforms will five C-130Bs.18 This will likely be the last become harder to purchase without the major platform upgrade by an American billions of dollars in aid from Washington. firm for the foreseeable future. Pakistan’s During the Obama administration, for fleet of almost 80 F-16s, along with example, Congressional objections 85 JF-17s from China, represent the prohibited Pakistan from using US funds mainstay of the country’s fighter to purchase eight F-16 Block 52 aircraft aircraft fleet. The F-16s saw action worth almost $700 million.16 Required during Operation Zarb-e-Azb, a military to finance the procurement on its own, campaign against the Pakistani Taliban Pakistan looked to buy cheaper F-16 credited with reducing terrorist attacks Block 30s from Jordan, although that in Pakistan.19 While the country’s F-16s transfer was reportedly blocked by the will remain operational until at least United States.17 2030, the Air Force will add another 50 JF-17s during the same time period and Absent security assistance, it will be will eventually overtake the F-16 as its difficult for American firms to maintain premiere attack aircraft. their predominant position in Pakistan’s military aircraft market. Over two-thirds Unlike in Pakistan, prospects for US of Pakistan’s mobility aircraft are firms in India’s defense market are American. Last year, Rockwell Collins growing. The case for continuing to withhold aid to Pakistan is strengthened by Washington’s growing defense partnership with New Delhi, which historically has viewed arms sales to Pakistan as an affront. India’s defense market is over five times that of Pakistan, and American firms have sold over $15 billion worth of defense equipment Along with a devalued rupee which will to India in the last decade.20 The United States now accounts for 12 percent of make imports more expensive, the Trump India’s total defense investment, and administration’s decision to freeze military American firms are active participants in competitions worth an additional aid will make US firms less competitive $24 billion. in Pakistan’s defense market. 6
What Pakistan May Foreshadow American firms will be less competitive Pakistan’s increased dependence on in Pakistan’s defense market due to the Chinese lending leave some worried freeze in US aid, Pakistan’s precarious whether Pakistan will be able to service foreign exchange position and reliance its debt obligations if CPEC investments on Chinese capital, and Washington’s yield lower-than-expected returns.25 As growing strategic and commercial ties Chinese influence increases in Islamabad, with India. The suspension of security American companies are bound to lose aid marks a new low in ties with Pakistan. out in the process. Despite Islamabad’s support for the Afghan Pakistan’s pivot from Washington may insurgency, previous administrations foreshadow developments elsewhere. reasoned that engagement would better Like Pakistan, the arsenals of Turkey, protect US interests than estrangement. Egypt, and Saudi Arabia have long been Pakistan was too close to Afghanistan, dominated by US defense platforms. too big, and had too many terrorist Amidst regional instability, an increasingly groups and nuclear weapons to risk a multipolar international system, and public confrontation. The recent decision growing Chinese influence, each of on military aid was a clear signal that these countries can now choose between the current White House has reached a Chinese, Russian, and Western alternatives. different conclusion.21 US market share can no longer be taken President Trump has gone further than for granted in these key countries, with his predecessors in openly trying to implications for American strategic and coerce Pakistan into acting against commercial interests. militant groups based in its country. In Despite current ties with the Trump turn, Pakistan has accelerated its embrace administration, it is up to Pakistan of China, positioning itself as Beijing’s whether security assistance will resume. most loyal friend in Asia and the primary Pakistan, however, is unlikely to change market for Chinese defense firms. course. The country has long considered Pakistan’s embrace may come at the maintaining influence in Afghanistan a expense of its financial independence.22 vital interest and views the Taliban and In the face of a currency crisis, Pakistan Haqqani Network its primary conduits in has accepted over $5 billion in loans doing so. An about-face would, however, US market share from Beijing during this fiscal year alone satisfy the conditions Washington has to shore up its foreign exchange position.23 can no longer be Pakistan’s dwindling currency reserves placed on its military aid. This would release billions of dollars in assistance taken for granted in threatened economic stability and the to Pakistan and boost its procurement future of the $62 billion China-Pakistan these key countries, Economic Corridor (CPEC), the budget by an estimated 36 percent through 2028. After the dramatic move with implications for key project in China’s Belt and Road by the Trump administration to freeze Initiative.24 American strategic security assistance, it will take a dramatic response from Pakistan to change and commercial Washington’s approach. interests. 7
Key Takeaways • American defense firms will continue to lose market share in Pakistan to Chinese, Turkish, and Russian counterparts amidst a suspension of US military aid, deteriorating ties with Washington, and declining rupee • Pakistan’s ability to import defense equipment from Western firms will grow more difficult over the long-term, as the country relies more heavily on Chinese capital to shore up its precarious foreign exchange position and service debt on loans associated with the $62 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor • At the same time, prospects in India – a democracy with a vibrant economy and a defense market that exceeds $53 billion – are growing, with American firms already active participants in competitions worth $24 billion • Absent more focused corporate strategies, the declining fortunes of U.S. firms in Pakistan’s defense market could foreshadow developments in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey – countries once dominated by American companies that can now realistically choose from non-Western alternatives Endnotes 1 https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/pakaid.pdf 15 https://quwa.org/2018/04/10/pakistan-begins- receiving-mi-35m-helicopters/ 2 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ pdf/10.1080/00963402.2016.1241520?needAccess=true 16 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-pakistan-planes/u-s- tells-pakistan-it-will-have-to-fund-f-16s-itself-idUSKCN0XT1U6 3 https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/ pubs/1225-Report-Dec-2017.pdf 17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyZ004QI6Iw&t=298s 4 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-34105565 18 https://www.rockwellcollins.com/Data/News/2017- Cal-Yr/GS/FY17GSNR33-Pakistan-C130.aspx 5 https://media.defense.gov/2017/Dec/15/2001856979/-1/- 1/1/1225-REPORT-DEC-2017-FINAL-UNCLASS-BASE.PDF 19 https://www.voanews.com/a/noticeable-decline- in-pakistan-terror-fatalities/4125523.html 6 https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/ status/947802588174577664?lang=en 20 http://carnegieendowment.org/2018/01/10/removing- barriers-to-u.s.-india-defense-trade-pub-75206 7 https://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2018/01/276858.htm 21 https://www.voanews.com/a/voa-interview-national-security- 8 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/15/pakistan-offensive- adviser-hr-mcmaster-pakistan-iran/4191703.html militants-north-waziristan; http://dunyanews.tv/en/Pakistan/390161- Salaries-of-govt-employees-raised-by-10pc-in-Budge 22 https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2153614/ pakistans-currency-crisis-china-problem-and-solution 9 https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr5515/BILLS-115hr5515pcs.pdf 23 https://www.ft.com/content/1256ceaa-802c-11e8-bc55-50daf11b720d 10 https://www.reuters.com/article/pakistan-rupee/ update-3-pakistans-new-rupee-devaluation-shows- 24 Ibid economic-risk-before-election-idUSL4N1TD2O1 25 https://www.economist.com/asia/2018/06/14/ 11 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-11/pakistan- pakistan-faces-a-currency-crisis.-who-will-help is-said-to-devalue-rupee-for-third-time-since-december 12 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pakistan-china- loans/china-lends-1-billion-to-pakistan-to-boost- plummeting-fx-reserves-sources-idUSKBN1JQ0TV 13 https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-global-building- spree-runs-into-trouble-in-pakistan-1532280460 14 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-08/ pakistan-refutes-imf-report-as-its-eyes-bonds-china-funding 8
About the Author About Avascent Shane Mason is a Senior Market Analyst with Avascent Analytics Avascent is the leading strategy and in Washington, DC. Shane was previously a Research Associate at management consulting firm serving the Stimson Center’s South Asia Program, and a Scoville Fellow clients operating in government-driven at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He graduated markets. Working with corporate leaders with an MA from the Middlebury Institute of International Studies and financial investors, Avascent delivers at Monterey, and received his BA from Pepperdine University. For sophisticated, fact-based solutions in the more information, contact: smason@avascent.com. areas of strategic growth, value capture, and mergers and acquisition support. With deep sector expertise, analytically rigorous consulting methodologies, and a uniquely flexible service model, Avascent provides clients with the insights and advice they need to succeed in dynamic customer environments. AVASCENT WASHINGTON DC 1615 L Street NW, Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20036 Tel: +1 (202) 452 6990 LONDON 132 Buckingham Palace Road London SW1W 9SA Tel: +44 (0) 20 3934 9100 PARIS 64-66 Rue des Archives 75003 Paris Tel: +33 (0) 1 87 39 21 12 OTTAWA Unit 200, 440 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON K1R 7X6 Tel: +1 (613) 564 8303 TOKYO 4F Yaesu Dori Bldg, 3-4-15 Nihonbashi Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027 Tel: +81 (80) 2246 8400 avascent.com europe.avascent.com Copyright © AVASCENT 2018
You can also read