Oil and gas after COVID-19: The day of reckoning or a new age of opportunity? - Webinar series
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Oil and gas after COVID-19: The day of reckoning or a new age of opportunity? Webinar series May 28th, 2020 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific permission of McKinsey & Company is strictly prohibited
Legal Briefing McKinsey has significant experience in organizing round table conferences amongst competing entities commercially active in the same industry/sector McKinsey recognizes the great value such conferences can have for all participants but is at the same time fully aware of the danger presented by facilitating discussions among competitors active in the same market McKinsey wants to ensure that today’s conference and the discussions are pro-competitive and do not result in a facilitation of sensitive information exchange between competing entities. To achieve this goal, McKinsey observes and also insists on making all conference participants aware of the "rules of the game" that each of us needs to adhere to in order to avoid discussions straying off limits and potentially violate competition laws: This is a forum to share early thoughts, experiences and learnings from the current COVID-19 crisis We are a group consisting of representatives from competing organizations Please refrain from sharing any competitive, confidential, non-public information1 We will follow Chatham House rules: participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed Please make use of the private messaging function, and feel free to reach out to us privately 1. Including, current or future customer information, pricing or quantities, marketing strategies or business plans, whether or not related to COVID-19 crisis McKinsey & Company 1
Your hosts and presenters for this session Pablo Ordorica Giorgio Bresciani Luciano Di Fiori Raúl Camba Senior Partner, Mexico Senior Partner, London Partner, Houston Partner, Mexico Pablo leads the Energy and Basic Giorgio leads McKinsey’s Oil & Gas Luciano leads McKinsey’s Energy Raúl has spent his consulting career Materials Practice in Latin America. Practice globally, serving clients Insights in the Americas. He has 10+ advising oil and gas companies in Pablo has 30 years of experience around the world to improve their years of experience serving clients Europe, Latin America, and North serving public and private sector performance. His work spans across in the North American America. His experience has clients on topics related to energy a wide range of topics, including unconventionals, global upstream, encompassed dozens of projects policy, upstream strategy, strategy and corporate finance, oilfield services, and midstream across a wide range of areas, operations, and organization growth, M&A and alliances, gas and sectors; advising them on a variety including operations, capital topics—in Mexico, the US, and liquefied natural gas (LNG), of strategy and M&A issues. projects, portfolio management, across the Americas. operations and capex performance technology and digitalization, and transformation, organization, and human resources. digital transformation. McKinsey & Company 2
Out of 9 scenarios, executives in the world and North America see a higher likelihood for “Muted Scenario” recovery Scenarios depend on effectiveness of public health response and economic policies Survey of 2,079 global executives (481 in North America); % of respondents World / North America % Rapid and effective B1 15/14% A3 16/12% A4 6/5% control of virus spread Virus Effective response, spread but (regional) virus B2 11/12% A1 31/39% A2 6/8% and public resurgence health response Broad failure of B3 3/1% B4 9/8% B5 2/1% public health interventions Ineffective Partially effective Highly effective interventions interventions interventions Knock-on effects and economic policy response Source: “In the tunnel: Executive expectations about the shape of the coronavirus crisis”; available online at https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/in-the- 4 tunnel-executive-expectations-about-the-shape-of-the-coronavirus-crisis; McKinsey survey of global executives, April 2–April 10, 2020, N=2,079
In Mexico, the sectors with the highest impact are expected to be hospitality, entertainment, manufacturing, and retail Scenarios assume partially effective economic policy interventions A1, Virus recurrence; slow long-term growth. Muted World Recovery GDP impact by sector; %YoY in 2020 4.8 2.6 0.7 0.7 0.2 -9.2 -9.7 -9.5 -10.8 -15.6 -15.9 -17.0 -18.8 -19.7 -19.7 -38.5 -39.9 National Health Media Agriculture Legal Electric Oil & Business Corp- Constr- Real Transpor Manuf- Whole- Retail Entertai- Hospit- services Gas support orate uction estate tation acturing sale nment ality And Mining Source: McKinsey McKinsey & Company 5
For the O&G, the COVID crisis has created an unprecedented shock that will require a fundamental shift in how the industry operates Details to follow The current context combines a supply Winning in the new environment will shock with an unprecedented demand require a change in strategy and drop and a global humanitarian crisis business model COVID-19’s impact on the O&G industry’s demand is Responding to this “New Normal” for O&G organizations unlike anything seen in recent history will require taking bold action during the crisis to Even with the recent OPEC+ agreements, the secure resilience; and we propose 4 distinctive implications for supply is profound with a low elements to act upon today: likelihood for the industry to return to pre-COVID prices Reshape portfolio and reallocate capital in the near-term Redesign operating model for profitability As such, significant capex reductions and shut-ins are Ensure supply chain resilience through likely to continue, and asset economics will play a partnerships fundamental role in portfolios and investments Create the organization of the future in both talent and structure 1. Based on A1 - Muted Recovery and A3 - Virus Contained scenarios McKinsey & Company 6
Pre-COVID the industry was underperforming against other industries; particularly over the last 5 years Cumulative total return to shareholders Oil & Gas companies1 Total return to shareholders1, 2, 3, 4 Index: Dec 1990 = 100, USD S&P500 CAGR, Percent, USD Brent2 Dec 1990 – Dec 2005 Dec 2005 – Dec 2019 1,800 Pre- COVID Integrated 5 15 4 1,600 2014 oil price 1,400 drop E&P 6 7 -1 1,200 2008 OFSE 13 -2 1,000 financial crisis 800 R&M 7 9 6 600 O&G overall 11 2 400 S&P500 12 9 200 0 Brent8 5 1 1995 2000 05 10 15 2020 (1) Not enough sample listed till 1996; (2) ConocoPhillips categorized as Integrated from Dec 1990 – Mar 2012 then as E&P from Apr 2012 – Dec 2019; (3) Marathon Oil Corporation categorized as Integrated from Dec 1990 – May 2011, then as E&P from Jun 2011 – Dec 2019; (4) Hess categorized as Integrated from Dec 1990 – Dec 2013, then E&P from Jan 2014 – Dec 2019; (5) Equinor categorized as Integrated; (6) Occidental Petroleum and Origin Energy categorized as E&P; (7) Excludes marketing pure plays; (8) Represents change in ICE Brent price Source: S&P CapitalIQ, team analysis McKinsey & Company 7
Recent decline in oil demand is unprecedented and recovery to pre- COVID levels is highly unlikely in the next couple of years Historical Pre-COVID-19 A3 - Virus Contained A1 - Muted Recovery Change in global oil demand, y-o-y change, Mbd – McKinsey Energy Insights projections Global liquids1 demand, Mbd 105 100 -7.5 2000 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 2020 95 -16.7 90 -7.5 85 0 2015 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2025 Steepest demand The industry will struggle to recover to 2019 levels change of a generation -16.7 Source: IEA World Energy Statistics © OECD/IEA 2020, McKinsey Energy Insights McKinsey & Company 8
Long term energy demand growth will be defined by behavioural, political and commercial trends that are still shaping Preliminary Increase in O&G demand/ delay Decrease in O&G demand / in energy transition acceleration of energy transition Potential effect Two potential extremes are Potential long-term shifts in demand possible Behavioral Remote working shifts (consu- mers) Staying closer to home Peak oil demand is delayed to 2050 as governments relax environmental Online shopping standards for companies and new technologies fail to emerge in the new Commercial Scarcity of investment capital for normal shifts (business new technologies and techno- Diversification to new technologies logy) Peak oil demand might have already happened in 2019 if changes in behavior De-globalization of supply chain combined with structural changes and Political shifts Postponement of climate agenda regulation results in an accelerated transition to green energies (regulators) Utilizing recovery support for climate agenda Self-sufficiency on a country level Source: McKinsey Global Oil and Gas Practice, 2020 McKinsey & Company 9
As we entered 2020 supply levels were already high, prompting the need for market adjustments Market balance (supply minus demand) Brent oil price Global oil market balance, Mbd Brent Crude Price, $/bbl 6.0 90 5.0 80 70 4.0 60 3.0 50 2.0 40 1.0 30 0 20 -1.0 10 -2.0 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Source: IEA, EIA McKinsey & Company 10
Updated May 6, 2020 Going forward, the outlook for the industry will fundamentally depend on the containment of the virus and OPEC+ compliance We consider three potential scenarios outcomes OPEC+ control restored Delayed demand recovery OPEC+ alignment • Inventory overhang is consumed ~2 • Inventory overhang is consumed 2+ OPEC+ implements agreed cuts in 2020 years years and manages output as needed to balance • Prices increase to ~$40/bbl by 2020 ad • Prices increase slowly to $60/bbl by How will OPEC+ the market 2021 onwards $60/bbl by 2022 2025 respond over the next three to five years? Longer oversupply (2020 – 2025) OPEC+ non-compliance • Assuming no extended shut-ins, large Widespread non-compliance in Q2 2020 inventory build-up takes multiple years to fails the deal, producers go back to Q1 consume output levels • Prices remain lo $20s with occasional $30s for the next 3 years A3 - Virus contained A1 - Muted Recovery 7.5Mbd demand reduction in 16.7Mbd demand reduction in 2020 vs 2019 2020 vs 2019 What is the extent of the impact of COVID-19 on demand? Source: McKinsey Energy Insights McKinsey & Company 11
In all scenarios, it is likely that capex reductions across drilling activity and FIDs will be significant North America Pre-COVID-19 Outlook Pre-COVID-19 outlook Longer Oversupply Delayed Demand Recovery OPEC+ Control Restored Low prices will add significant pressure Drilling activity in the US will continue to Offshore activity – particularly on investments; almost $160 B USD decline and reach it’s lowest point in deepwater – will be significantly could be at risk today 2021-22 impacted Deepwater development capex spending Global oil development capex spending, USD North American shale oil rig count Including KSA, UAE, Kuwait and Russia, USD billion # of rigs billion 800 800 90 700 700 80 600 600 70 60 500 500 50 400 400 40 300 300 30 27% 200 -22% 200 20 100 100 -50% -48% 10 0 0 0 2019 20 21 22 23 24 2025 2019 20 21 22 23 24 2025 2019 20 21 22 23 24 2025 Up to 2025 it is unlikely that investments in development CAPEX In the most extreme scenario of OPEC+ non-compliance and muted Deepwater spending by 2021 could see a reduction between 25- return to pre-COVID estimations; which can potentially generate a recovery; rig activity in US could be reduced by +80% by 2021 from 50%; while recovery by 2025 is likely, levels of investment compared supply shortage post 2025 original estimates to original pre-COVID estimates will be at least 25M USD lower Can industry deflation create opportunities for lower cost developments? Source: McKinsey Energy Insights; Rystad, Wood Mackenzie McKinsey & Company 12
Under these scenarios, asset economics will play a fundamental role in investment allocations Relative profitability of asset classes will be critical to shape portfolio Global Cost curve of liquids and 2030 breakeven prices (2P) Full cycle production cost1, USD/bbl 130 120 For MX: ~30% of reserves profitable at $40+ ~70% of reserves profitable at $40-50 110 100 90 80 70 World: ~70% of reserves profitable at $40+ 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 Other liquids2 Liquids production, MMb/d The majority of Mexico´s reserves may not be profitable at 40 USD/Bl; however, ~ 70% of the world’s reserves are Players in Mexico will need to push for lower breakeven cost and de-risking of the basin 1. Based on OPEX (excluding SG&A) and Royalties, adjusted for cash flows from non-crude / condensates; excludes Government Profit, Income Ta 2. Includes biofuels, GTLs (Gas-to-liquids), Ctls (coal-to-liquids), MTBE, refinery profits and NGLs – Equilibrium costs shown are conceptual 3. Production cost is capped in 130USD/Bbl For the purpose of the presentation Source: McKinsey Energy Insights; Rystad, Wood Mackenzie McKinsey & Company 13
The challenge of cost reduction is not trivial as the industry has already pushed strong improvements over the last decade Goldman Sachs Top Projects cost curve of pre-plateau projects through the years Breakeven price 2009 2011 2013 2015 2019 2017 $/barrel 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Cumulative peak oil production (kboe/d) 1. Identified projects (pre-sanction, under development and production) are evaluated each year and assigned a breakeven price and peak oil production. The oil cost curve depicts the cumulative peak oil production of identified projects. Kboe/d is thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day. Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research McKinsey & Company 14
For the O&G, the COVID crisis has created an unprecedented shock that will require a fundamental shift in how the industry operates Details to follow The current context combines a supply Winning in the new environment will shock with an unprecedented demand require a change in strategy and drop and a global humanitarian crisis business model COVID-19’s impact on the O&G industry’s demand is Responding to this “New Normal” for O&G organizations unlike anything seen in recent history will require taking bold action during the crisis to Even with the recent OPEC+ agreements, the secure resilience; and we propose 4 distinctive implications for supply is profound with a low elements to act upon today: likelihood for the industry to return to pre-covid prices in Reshape portfolio and reallocate capital the near-term Redesign operating model for profitability As such, significant capex reductions and shut-ins are Ensure supply chain resilience through likely to continue, and asset economics will play a partnerships fundamental role in portfolios and investments Create the organization of the future in both talent and structure 1. Based on A1 - Muted Recovery and A3 - Virus Contained scenarios McKinsey & Company 15
We see 4 key imperatives for O&G organizations in Mexico (1/2) Reshape portfolio and radically reallocate Unlock a step-change in performance and capital to the highest-return opportunities cost competitiveness through re- imagining the operating model Redefine your asset portfolio strategy (i.e., keep, Identify the full-potential for critical assets and transform, partner, decommission) across basins – redesign the operating model for profitable resilience critical to understand relative position of Mexico vs global portfolios and de-risk investments proactively Redouble your efforts to sustain or even scale-up your digital and advanced analytics transformations to Systematically manage for uncertainty and cash (i.e., achieve the next s-curve productivity and cost dynamic field shut-ins, capex prioritization); double-down efficiency (e.g., remote operations) on discipline for strategic scenario planning Explore partnerships with OFSE´s to increase Proactively scan the M&A market and be ready to take efficiency, acknowledging they may be already at bold opportunistic moves to develop an advantaged the edge of profitability long-term portfolio McKinsey & Company 16
We see 4 key imperatives for O&G organizations in Mexico (2/2) Details to follow Ensure supply-chain resilience through Create the Organization of the Future, in partnerships both talent and structure Promote new commercial and collaborative models Radically flatten hierarchies, reduce bureaucracy, and with your ecosystem to increase industry push decision making to the edge—in short, embed standardization, shared infrastructure/services and more agile ways of working new innovation models Develop an aggressive approach to re-design your Explore multi-project strategic collaboration and talent base; business-model transformation will require Integrated Project Delivery models the best engineers, but also new talent in digital, technology and commercial McKinsey & Company 17
Basin level competitiveness will be critical, AMEXHI could play a role fostering collaboration to strengthen supply chains OGUK1 case example Sample guidelines from OGUK for supply chain collaboration Risk and costs should be borne appropriately, be proportional to the work scope and not be forced on anyone; In 2019, OGUK opportunity or good performance should benefit everyone, and performance-based contractual rewards should members have be investigated developed a new set of Supply Chain Contractual terms and conditions will seek to use industry standard contracts when appropriate and all parties will Principles which aim to commit to mutuality of payment terms […] further improve the commercial All parties should ensure they have the competence and skill to deliver the work being tendered and will not accept re- relationships between bidding as a means of driving price down operators and contractors and drive Purchasers shall endeavor to optimize their tendering and audit requirements to ensure that the suppliers resources, an overall more time and costs are not unnecessarily impacted or wasted sustainable supply chain across the basin Operators and contractors should discourage the practice of "low ball" bidding - which invariably leads to multiple contract variations and affects re-negotiation in the early phase of the contract To support respective labour agreements in place across the workforce, operators should agree clear rate escalation mechanisms and move away from the practice of fixing labour rates for multiple years 1. The UK O&G Industry Association Source: OGUK Economic Report 2019 McKinsey & Company 18
You can also read