NG-EPON Call for Interest - IEEE 802
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
NG-EPON Call for Interest Glen Kramer, Broadcom Marek Hajduczenia, Bright House Networks Duane Remein, Huawei Technologies Ed Harstead, Alcatel Lucent Bill Powell, Alcatel-Lucent Curtis Knittle, CableLabs 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 1
NGEPON EPON is an 802.3 Success Story Why is EPON successful? It’s simple… 120 Millions 106.1 100 1G-EPON ONU Units (cummulative) We steal! 88.6 80 70.4 – EPON utilizes many components and building 60 blocks “borrowed” from other Ethernet standards. 48.0 40 – Relying on proven, mature, and mass-produced 30.2 20.6 components leads to low-cost solutions and fast 20 15.4 9.1 4.6 time to market. 1.8 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 And we fight! Source: Infonetics (2004-2007), Ovum (2008-2014) – Network operators, OEMs, chip vendors, and 1 ONU and OLT optics vendors all have different pain points. In 0.8 Transceiver Cost 802.3, we argue until we find the best balance 0.6 1G ONU 1G-OLT between performance, capex, and opex. 10G ONU 0.4 10G OLT For these reasons, EPON was adopted 0.2 (1) quickly, (2) worldwide, and (3) by telcos 0 and MSOs alike. 0 1 2 3 4 Years Since Standard Approval 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Source: Ligent Photonics 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 2
EPON is an EcosystemNGEPON “EPON” is not a collection of disparate technologies – it is O G . M 98 C 8 an access ecosystem. If A or m EP d.1 O 802.3ah and 802.3av have N laid a foundation of EPON 2.3av IEEE 80 N ecosystem that now includes 10G-EP O multiple complementary 2.3b k IEEE 80 system-level specifications IEEE 802.3ah and 802.3av E E 8 0 2.3ah IE N IEEE 802.3bk 1G-EPO IEEE 1904.1 – SIEPON CableLabs DPoE1.0 and DPoE2.0 ITU-T G.988 Amd. 1 0 R-20 BBF TR-200 BBF T CCSA series of EPON standards 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 3
NGEPON EPON is a Universal Architecture All user types Residential Businesses Wi-Fi/Cellular backhaul MTU ONU Cellular Backhaul Cat-5 / xDSL / EoC per Floor All configurations Riser Business SFU FTTB ONU Clock Transport MDU/MTU FTTB- IEEE 1588 MTU ONU in MTU Wiring Closet / FTTH 1Gb/s à Basement 10 Gb/s à FTTC/FTTN ß 1 Gb/s ß 10 Gb/s OLT with Traffic Management FTTC / FTTN All Data Rates ONU in Outside xDSL 1/1 Gb/s (.3ah) Cabinet FTTH SL 10/1 Gb/s (.3av) Home Networking xD 10/10 Gb/s (.3av) SFU ONU GE All supported HGW x oa /C FE on the same STB / IP-STB network! 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 4
NGEPON EPON is an Evolving Technology Network operators see EPON as a seamlessly-evolving technology ONU1 ONU2 ONU3 ONU4 Unique method for 1G-EPON and ONU5 ONU6 ONU7 ONU8 10G-EPON coexistence allows Dual-rate ONU9 ONU10 ONU11 ONU12 mixed operation of two generations of EPON ONUs on the same ODN OLT ONU13 ONU14 ONU15 ONU16 and pay-as-you-grow upgrade ONU61 ONU62 ONU63 ONU64 As optical technology matured, extended DNS power budgets were added (802.3bk) HFC Network DHCP EPON has evolved to support DOCSIS SNMP CMTS Cable Modems back-office functions (DPoE) TFTP IP/Transport Network ONUs EPON must continue to evolve to meet SYSLOG OLT changing requirements, to satisfy the ever- increasing demands, and to support new RKS markets and applications. TGS EPON Network 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 5
Why are we here? NGEPON To measure the interest in starting a study group to investigate a “Next Generation EPON” project within 802.3. You will hear: This meeting will NOT: NG-EPON Market Potential Fully explore the problem − Marek Hajduczenia, Bright House Networks Debate strengths and NG-EPON Technical Feasibility weaknesses of solutions − Duane Remein, Huawei Technologies Choose any one solution − Bill Powell, Alcatel-Lucent Create a PAR, CSD or Concluding Remarks and Straw Polls Objectives − Curtis Knittle, CableLabs Create a standard or specification 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 6
NG-EPON Market Potential Marek Hajduczenia, Bright House Networks 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 7
NGEPON Access Bandwidth Demand Business Access Networks Residential Access Networks Similar trends drive the bandwidth demand in business and residential access networks. Three linearly increasing bandwidth drivers lead to the exponential growth of the total bandwidth demand: _ = × ⁄ × ⁄ 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 8
NGEPON Growing Number of Subscribers Lots of people still do not have fixed broadband! Worldwide broadband subscriptions 40% 11% Worlwide Broadband penetration Developing world 30% Developed world 20% Most of the world still does not have broadband 10% 89% 0% 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Source: www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/statistics/2015/ITU_Key_2005-2015_ICT_data.xls Even in mature markets, subscriber count is still growing – “broadband subscribers” include residential and SOHO customers Source: Netmanias, 2015 – data for South Korea 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 9
NGEPON More Devices per Subscriber ~12 billion internet- connected devices in 2015 – ~1.7 devices per person Expecting 33+ billion devices by 2020, driven by IoT, smart home, smartphones, etc. – ~4.3 devices per person Emerging IoT devices will dominate connected world – M2M – Smart home – Smart objects – Smart grid – Smart cities 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 10
NGEPON Increasing Data Rates per Device/App Improving quality of streaming video services Bandwidth per video stream Mb/s – HD is here 80 MPEG2 – Next step: 4K with 60 fps 70 H.264 60 – DisplayPort 2.1 will support HEVC 8K @ 60 fps and 4K @ 120/240 fps 50 40 Gaming As A Service (GaaS) 30 – Nvidia announced GaaS with full HD 20 at 60 fps: 10 • 15 Mb/s is required 0 SDTV HDTV HDTV HDTV 4K UHDTV 8K UHDTV • 50 Mb/s is recommended (480i/30) (720p/30) (1080i/60) (1080p/60) (4K/60) (8K/60) Source: http://www.polygon.com/2015/3/5/8146683/nvidia-shield-console Telepresence, teleHealth … – HD video & sound, with virtual reality in the future – Remote life sign monitoring, analysis, tele-radiology, virtual house calls … 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 11
NGEPON Increasing Data Rates per Device/App More concurrent online sessions or parallel video streams Longer online sessions, with higher peak rates per device Multiple video streams for split-screen / picture-in-picture Sky adds split-screen Formula-1 viewing Content personalization More on-demand / time-shifted and less broadcast increases bandwidth consumption per sub “Comcast customers can now live- stream videos over the Internet from their smartphone directly to the TV to share with friends and family.” Comcast press release, 4 May 2015 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 12
NGEPON New Apps Require Higher Rates Faster-Than-Real-Time – Prefetching digital content onto your device to combat network impairments (loss, latency, etc.) Download-To-Go – Downloading digital content (movies, music) to a tablet or car entertainment system before travel Cloud services integrated into all major operating systems – Access content anywhere, on any device, “Schools that switched from at any time, with no lags Windows-based notebooks to Chromebooks saw 700 times – Cloud compute and storage increase increase in network traffic.” access bandwidth consumption http://www.slideshare.net/PrincipledTechnol ogies/chromebook-vs-windows-notebook- network-traffic-analysis 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 13
NGEPON Growing Number of Business Subs Major trends: Source: Wireless Broadband Alliance, 2015 – Continued high rate of deployment of new cell towers and public Wi-Fi APs – Existing businesses move from mobile to fixed broadband for better SLA and higher data rates – Growing number of small businesses and home offices switching to business-grade access: Doctor’s offices, home offices, etc. Cell Site Growth in the US High-speed, 350K 302K high-reliability 300K Source: DXX Report, March 2013 250K 213K access is now 200K 139K considered 150K fundamental 100K 52K to successful 50K 0 business! 1997 2002 2007 2012 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 14
NGEPON BW Intensive Business Apps Cloud and SAN solutions drive bandwidth demand – For enterprises with demand for secure “big data” storage Advanced “remote office” solutions for telecommuting – Access to corporate networks via VPN – No local data storage for security Outsourced IT staff/infrastructure – Managed firewall – Intrusion detection – DDoS mitigation – Other security solutions – Remote (cloud) compute & storage Rapid increase in number of connected devices per business – Laptops, tablets, smartphones, etc. 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 15
NGEPON Cellular Backhaul Bandwidth Assuming the current growth rate Similar continues, 1 Gb/s per cell tower bandwidth in urban areas will be required growth trend is by end of 2016 visible in all cell towers in all Bandwidth demand per cell tower locations, though on different time scales. 500 400 2013: 100 Mb/s − mostly 3G and little 4G traffic 300 2014: ~350 Mb/s − broader Mb/s adoption of 4G devices 200 (single channel). 2015: ~500 Mb/s (projected 100 demand) − proliferation of 4G channel bonding. 0 2013 2014 2015 Source: internal analysis of Bright House Networks 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 16
NGEPON Unabated Bandwidth Growth Bandwidth CAGR above 2011-2014 BHN Traffic Volume 800% 20% across industry 700% for the last 5+ years 600% Some operators see CAGR of 64% for last 4 years! 500% +64% YoY 400% Business services +36% YoY deployed without 300% +47% YoY oversubscription 200% Operators run out of 100% bandwidth on OLT ports 0% before running out of 2011 2012 2013 2014 power budget Source: Bright House Networks Residential access bandwidth demand closely follows the evolution of wired and wireless home networks In 3-5 years, home network speeds will increase to 2.5/5G Last month Comcast started deployments of 2 Gb/s symmetric residential service (15th speed increase in 13 years) 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 17
Residential demand can break 10G-EPON NGEPON A large fraction of broadband users live in Multi-Dwelling Units (MDUs) MDU ONUs Fiber-to-the-Building (MDU) aggregates Forecasted peak hour aggregate demand hundreds of subscribers Heavy scenario, 100% unicast video, 1 Gb/s service level on a single PON Aggregated demand (Gb/s) Approx. 10G EPON 10 TCP/IP capacity In dense MDU 512 subscribers environments, the 256 subscribers 128 subscribers 10G-EPON capacity is predicted to be 1 insufficient 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 E. Harstead, R. Sharpe, “Forecasting of Access Network Bandwidth Demands for Aggregated Subscribers using Monte Carlo Methods”, IEEE Comm. Mag., Mar. 2015. 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 18
NGEPON Bandwidth Targets (Business Access) In a typical business Subscriber Type Guaranteed Access access scenario, the Bandwidth Range NG-EPON is expected (2018-2025) to serve a combination Small Business 0.1–1 Gbps of small, medium, and large businesses, and Medium Business 1–2.5 Gbps to provide backhaul Large Business 5–10 Gbps connectivity for Cellular Backhaul 1–5 Gbps cellular towers. Typical Combinations of Subscribers Required PON Capacity Small Medium Large Cellular Business Business Business Tower 24 8 - - ~ 30 Gbps 16 8 - 8 ~ 32 Gbps - 16 1 8 ~ 38 Gbps 16 8 2 4 ~ 40 Gbps 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 19
Market Demands NGEPON Capacity of existing access solutions will be exhausted in several years New solutions are needed that would achieve 25+ Gb/s per PON for residential and 40+ Gb/s per PON for businesses The new solution has to be able to Operate over existing ODNs Support mixed business and residential access Coexist with previous generation(s) Now is the time to start working on the new standard. 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 20
NG-EPON Technical Feasibility Duane Remein, Huawei Ed Harstead, Alcatel-Lucent Bill Powell, Alcatel-Lucent 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 21
NGEPON Technology Advancements The last time 802.3 considered technology selection for optical access was in 2006-2007, during the early stages of the 10G-EPON project (802.3av) Since that time, new technologies have emerged and/or matured enough to become feasible candidates for the next generation of optical access – Optical component advances may allow use of WDM in EPON • Optical Arrays • Tunable Lasers • Tunable Optical Receivers – Advanced optical modulation may allow 25 Gb/s serial transmission using 10 Gb/s optical components • Duobinary • PAM4 – 802.3 optical 25 Gb/s ecosystem 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 22
NGEPON Recent TWDM Breakthroughs World’s First Demonstration of Pluggable Optical Transceiver Modules for Flexible TWDM PONs (Huawei, presented at ECOC 2013, details on next slide) 100-ns λ-selective Burst-Mode Transceiver for 40-km Reach Symmetric 40-Gbit/s WDM/TDM-PON (NTT, presented at ECOC 2013) Low Cost TWDM by Wavelength-Set Division Multiplexing (Alcatel Lucent, published in Bell Labs Technical Journal, December 2013.) Demonstration of 10G Burst-Mode DML and EDC in Symmetric 40Gbit/s TWDM-PON over 40km Passive Reach (ZTE, presented at OFC 2014) First Field Trial of 40-km Reach and 1024-Split Symmetric-Rate 40-Gbit/s λ-tunable WDM/TDM-PON (NTT, presented at OFC 2015.) Demonstration of a Symmetric 40 Gbit/s TWDM-PON Over 40 km Passive Reach Using 10 G Burst-Mode DML and EDC for Upstream Transmission (ZTE, published in Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 2015) 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 23
TWDM System Demo NGEPON Downstream: 4 λ’s @ 10Gb/s each 4 ONUs with pluggable optics Upstream: 4 λ’s @ 2.5 Gb/s each – Tunable optical filter – Tunable laser with thermal control 20 km with 1:64 split OLT 20ps ONU1 Tunable 10G filter Rx 10G Tx TWDM PON 10G Tx MUX WDM filter EDFA MAC 10G Tx 20-40 kM 2.5G Tunable laser λ1 - λ4 (L band) TWDM 10G Tx WDM PON Filter ONU2 MAC 2.5G Rx λ5 - λ8 (C band) DEMUX 2.5G Rx EDFA ONU3 2.5G Rx 2.5G Rx ONU4 test set 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 24
Optical Arrays NGEPON 4 Channel EML Array 4 Channel APD Array Clock EML DEMUX Retimer APD LA Array MUX Laser & & TIA & Clock /SOA Driver Array Recovery Array Array Lens K. Taguchi, K. Asaka, M. Fujiwara, S. Kaneko, T.i Yoshida, Y. Fujita, H. Iwamura, M. Kashima, S. Furusawa, M. Sarashina, H.Tamai, A. Suzuki, T. Mukojima, S. Kimura, K. Suzuki and A. Otaka, “First Field Trial of 40-km Reach and 1024-Split Symmetric-Rate 40-Gbit/s-tunable WDM/TDM-PON”, OFC 2015. 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 25
Tunable Optics NGEPON Tunable Transmitter Options Tunable Receiver Options Tuning Tuning Tuning Tuning Range Time Range Time Distributed Feedback (DFB) laser Fabry-Perot Filters − Thermal tuning 3-4 nm ms − Thermo-optical 40 nm s (λ changes with ∆T) − Liquid Crystal 30 nm ms Distributed Bragg Reflector (DBR) − MEMS 221 nm ms − Grating Current 8 nm ns Waveguide filters (λ changes with ∆I at grating) − MZI 15 nm µs Jinglei, “Tunable optics technology and relative cost trends,” http://www.ieee802.org/3/ − Micro Ring 20 nm ms ad_hoc/ngepon/public/mar14/jinglei_ngepon_ 01_0314.pdf, March 2014, Beijing, PRC. Micro-motor filters − Angle Adjustment 80 nm ms − Linear Variable 380 nm ms − Cavity Length 60 nm ms DFB laser with an Adjustment electro‐absorption Minghui Tao, Zhicheng Ye, “Tunable Receiver Technologies”, (EA) modulator http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/ngepon/public/sep14/tao_ngepon_01a_0914.pdf, September 2014, Kanata, Ontario. Source: Archcom Technology 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 26
NGEPON
Modulation Options for NG-EPON
NRZ OOK
NRZ {0,1}
Duobinary (electrical):
low pass filter approximation
NRZ {0,1} {0,1,2}
Low pass filter bandwidth ≈ 40% of NRZ
PAM4
MSB {0,1} 4-level
encoder
{0,1,2,3}
LSB {0,1}
Possible re-use of PAM4 from 100GBASE-KP4,
802.3bs CDAUI-8 and 8x50G 10 km SMF
Time Frequency
14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 27NGEPON 25 Gb/s TDM PON: NRZ Modulation Optical Based on Based on 25G (e.g. • Deltas compared to 10G-EPON technology key 10G-EPON 100GBASE-ER4) 10G/10G NRZ EPON OLT ONU 10G APD BMR 10G DML BM Tx Di- Di- 10G logic 10G logic plexer plexer 10G EML Tx 10G APD Rx For reference, 802.3av 25G NRZ/10G NRZ EPON 10G APD BMR 10G DML BM Tx Di- Di- 25G logic 25G logic plexer plexer 25G EML Tx 25G APD Rx 25G NRZ/25G NRZ EPON 25G APD BMR 25G EML BM Tx Di- Di- 25G logic 25G logic plexer plexer 25G EML Tx 25G APD Rx • 25 Gb/s optics required in the ONU and OLT – Potential re-use of 25 Gb/s 100GBASE-ER4 optics 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 28
25 Gb/s TDM PON: Duobinary Modulation NGEPON Optical Based on Based on 25G (e.g. • Deltas compared to 10G-EPON technology key 10G-EPON 100GBASE-ER4) 10G/10G NRZ EPON OLT ONU 10G APD BMR 10G DML BM Tx Di- Di- 10G logic 10G logic plexer plexer 10G EML Tx 10G APD Rx For reference, 802.3av 25G Duobinary/10G NRZ EPON 10G APD BMR 10G DML BM Tx Di- Di- 25G logic 25G logic plexer plexer 25G EML Tx 10G APD Rx* 25G Duobinary/25G Duobinary EPON 25G APD BMR 10G DML BM Tx* Di- Di- 25G logic 25G logic plexer plexer 25G EML Tx 10G APD Rx* *Low pass filter function • In the ONU, same 10G optics as 10G-EPON • Potential re-use of 25 Gb/s 100GBASE-ER4 optics in the OLT 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 29
Duobinary ModulationNGEPON Demo 26 Gb/s downstream, with 10 Gb/s receiver 1314 PC 10- Variable SOA nm MZM 40 km Gbps Attenuator SFP APD 26 Gbps DSO Gen. Transmitted NRZ-OOK eye Received duobinary eye (with decision threshold levels indicated) D. van Veen, V. Houtsma, P. Winzer, and P. Vetter (Bell Labs), "26-Gbps PON Transmission over 40-km using Duobinary Detection with a Low Cost 7-GHz APD-Based Receiver," ECOC 2012 OSA Technical Digest, Tu.3.B.1 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 30
25 Gb/s TDM PON: PAM4NGEPON Modulation Optical Based on 25G, or stretch • Deltas compared to 10G-EPON technology key 10G-EPON 10G components 10G/10G NRZ EPON OLT ONU 10G APD BMR 10G DML BM Tx Di- Di- 10G logic 10G logic plexer plexer 10G EML Tx 10G APD Rx For reference, 802.3av 25G PAM-4/10G NRZ EPON 10G APD BMR 10G DML BM Tx 12.5G Di- Di- 12.5G logic plexer plexer logic DAC 12.5G EML Tx* 10G APD Rx ADC 25G PAM-4/25G PAM-4 EPON ADC 10G APD BMR 12.5G DML BM Tx* DAC 12.5G Di- Di- 12.5G logic plexer plexer logic DAC 12.5G EML Tx* 10G APD Rx ADC *Requires linearized driver • Target = same optics as 10G-EPON – Might be possible to stretch 10 Gb/s components (to be confirmed) 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 31
NGEPON PAM4 Modulation Demo 25 Gb/s downstream, with 10 Gb/s receiver PAM4 l=1565 nm ECL transmitter 10 Gb/s receiver Digital 65 GSa/s RF driver M-Z Var APD TIA storage 8 bit DAC amplifier modulator Atten scope Pre-distortion Linearized transmitted Back-to-back receiver sensitivity signal @10-3 BER = -21.5 dBm V. Houtsma, D. van Veen, E. Harstead, “PAM-4 vs. duobinary modulation @25 Gb/s”, ngepon_0115_houtsma_01, Jan. 2015. 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 32
Future Decisions NGEPON MAC rate – 10 Gb/s, 25 Gb/s, 40 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s? One or multiple wavelengths in each direction? If multiple wavelengths to be used … – How many wavelengths? – Reuse ITU-T G.989.2 NG-PON2 wavelength plan or define a new one? – Optics in the ONU: fixed or tunable? Or develop a protocol that allows for either? – Specify multi-lane PHYs, channel bonding, or none. Line rate per wavelength – 10 Gb/s, 25 Gb/s, 40 Gb/s, other? – Modulation scheme: NRZ OOK, duobinary, PAM4? 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 33
Summary Curtis Knittle, CableLabs 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 34
Marketing Recap NGEPON Increasing bandwidth • Number of subscribers is still growing • Applications becoming more bandwidth-hungry • More Internet-connected devices per subscriber • Demand for access capacity is growing exponentially 10G-EPON will reach its limits soon • Bit rates greater than 10 Gb/s will be needed by 2018 for some applications • Now is the time to start working on next gen. access What is needed • 25+ Gb/s for residential and 40+ Gb/s for business access • Converged access platform for business and residential • Coexistence with previous generation(s) and gradual upgrade capability 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 35
Technology Recap NGEPON Potential technologies prototyped • WDM stacking of multiple TDM PON systems • Optical receiver and/or transmitter arrays • Tunable burst mode transmitters and receivers • Advanced modulations schemes (duobinary, PAM4) for balancing the cost of optics with the cost of electronics Future technology decisions • Single or multiple wavelengths in each direction − Number of wavelengths − Wavelength plan − Tunability − Channel bonding or multi-lane PHY • Bit rate per wavelength − 10 Gb/s, 25 Gb/s, 40Gb/s − Modulation scheme: Duobinary, PAM4, NRZ 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 36
Summary NGEPON 1. Market demands the next generation access solution 2. There exist technologies that would allow the next generation of access systems to achieve the required performance at a reasonable cost 3. Presenters and supporters recommend formation of a Study Group to develop PAR, objectives, and CSD Supporters Alan M. Brown, CommScope Curtis Donahue, UNH IOL Alan Tipper, Semtech Curtis Knittle, CableLabs Bill Powell, Alcatel-Lucent David Li, Hisense-Ligent Bharat Tailor, Semtech Dawit Asfaha, Shaw Communications Bruce Chow, Corning Denis Beaudoin, Texas Instruments Craig Hrycoy, Shaw Communications Duane Remein, Huawei 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 37
NGEPON Wait, more supporters! Ed Harstead, Alcatel-Lucent Mark Laubach, Broadcom Ed Mallette, Bright House Networks Matt Petersen, Charter Communications Eugene Dai, Cox Communications Mehmet Toy, Comcast Frank Effenberger, Huawei Michael Emmendorfer, Arris Glen Kramer, Broadcom Michael Peters, Sumitomo Guo Yong, ZTE Raz Gabe, PMC-Sierra Hanhyub Lee, ETRI Rick Li, Cortina Systems Hesham Elbakoury, Huawei Robin Lavoie, Cogeco Hossam Salib, Comcast Ryan Hirth, Broadcom Hussam Tarazi, Shaw Communications Ryan Tucker, Charter Communications HwanSeok Chung, ETRI Saifur Rahman, Comcast Ivan Lamoureux, Suddenlink Shane Woodard , Suddenlink Joe Solomon, Comcast Shen Chengbin, China Telecom John Dickinson, Bright House Networks Steve Gorshe, PMC-Sierra Jorge Salinger, Comcast Toshihiko Kusano, Oliver Solutions Kevin Noll, Time Warner Cable Victor Blake, Independent consultant Liu Qian, RITT Yuan Liquan, ZTE Lu Yang, RITT Zhigang Gong, O-Net Marek Hajduczenia, Bright House Networks Zhou Zhen, Fiberhome Technologies 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 38
NGEPON Straw Poll – SG Formation Should a study group be formed to develop PAR, CSD, and Objectives for Next Generation EPON? All in the room 802.3 voters Yes No Abstain Room Count 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 39
NGEPON Straw Poll - Participation I would participate in a “Next Generation EPON” study group in IEEE 802.3 Count: ________ My company would participate in a “Next Generation EPON” study group Count : ________ 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 40
Acronyms NGEPON ADC Analog to Digital Converter APD Avalanche Photodiode BM Burst Mode BMR Burst Mode Receiver DAC Digital to Analog Converter DBR Distributed Bragg Reflector DFB Distributed Feedback DML Directly Modulated Laser ECL External Cavity Laser EML Electro-absorptive Modulated Laser LC Liquid Crystal LSB Least significant bit MEMS Micro Electro Mechanical Systems MSB Most significant bit MZ Mach-Zehnder MZI Mach-Zehnder Interferometer MZM Mach-Zehnder Modulator NRZ Non-return to zero OOK On-Off Keying PAM Pulse amplitude modulation PC Polarization Controller TWDM Time and wavelength division multiplexing UNI User Network Interface 14 July 2015 IEEE 802.3 Working Group meeting, Waikoloa HI 41
You can also read
