NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT - Region: Chatham-Kent/L ambton/Sarnia
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Needs Assessment Report n/Sarnia Regioon p - Chatham-Kent/Lambton June 12, 2016 Hydro One Netw works Inc. 483 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M5G 2P5 NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT Region: Chatham-Kent/Lambton/Sarnia Date: June 12, 22016 Preparred by: Cha atham-Kent//Lambton/S Sarnia Stud dy Team
Needs Assessment Rep port – Chatham m-Kent/Lambton/Sarnia Regioon Junee 12, 2016 This reeport is preppared on beehalf of the Chatham-K Kent/Sarnia/L Lambton reggional plannning study teeam with thee participatio on of represeentatives from m the follow wing organizzations: Orgganizations Hydro One Networrks Inc. (Leaad Transmittter) Independent Electricity Systtem Operator Bluew water Powerr Distributionn Corporatioon En ntegrus Inc. Hyddro One Netw works Inc. (D Distribution)) Pagee | 2
Needs Assessment Rep port – Chatham m-Kent/Lambton/Sarnia Regioon Junee 12, 2016 Disclaim mer This Neeeds Assessm ment Reportt was preparred for the puurpose of iddentifying pootential needds in the Chhatham-Kentt/Lambton/Sarnia and to assess whether thoose needs require furrther coordin nated regional planning.. The potenttial needs thhat have beeen identified through this Needs Assessmentt Report may be studiied further through suubsequent reegional plannning processses and may be reevaluated based on n the findinggs of furtherr analysis. Thhe load forecast and ressults reporteed in this Needs Assesssment Repoort are baseed on the innformation and assumpptions providded by study team particiipants. Study team partiicipants, th heir respecttive affiliatted organizzations, andd Hydro One Networrks Inc. (collectively, “tthe Authors””) make no representations or warrranties (exprress, impliedd, statutory or otherwise)) as to the Needs Assesssment Reporrt or its conttents, includding, withoutt limitation, the accuraccy or complleteness of the informaation thereinn and shall not, under any circumsttances whatssoever, be liiable to eachh other, or too any third party for whhom the Neeeds Assessm ment Report was prepareed (“the Inttended Thirdd Parties”), or to any other third paarty reading or receiving g the Needs Assessment Report (“thhe Other Third Parties”),, for any direect, indirect or consequeential loss orr damages o r for any puunitive, inciddental or speecial damagees or any loss of profit, lo oss of contraact, loss of o pportunity or loss of goodwill resulting from orr in any way related to the reliancee on, accepttance or usee of the Neeeds Assessm ment Report or its con ntents by any person or entity, including, but not limited to, the aforemeentioned perrsons and enttities. Pagee | 3
Needs Assessment Rep port – Chatham m-Kent/Lambton/Sarnia Regioon Junee 12, 2016 NEEDS ASSESSMEN NT EXECUT TIVE SUMM MARY NAME Chaatham-Kent/L Lambton/Sarnnia Study Teaam LEAD Hydro One Netw works Inc. REGION Chaatham-Kent/L Lambton/Sarnnia START DAT TE Aprril 13, 2016 END DAT TE June 122, 2016 1. IN NTRODUCTION The purpose of this Needs Assessment report is to undertake an assessment of the Chatham- Kent/Lambton/Sarnia Region and determine if there are regional needs that require coordinated regional planning. Where regional coordination is not reqquired, and a “localized” wires solutioon is necessarry, such needs will beb addressed between releevant Local Distribution D C Companies (LLDCs) and H Hydro One annd other parties as req quired. For needs thhat require furrther regionall planning andd coordinationn, the Indepeendent Electricity System O Operator (IESO) will initiate the Scoping Asseessment proceess to determ mine whether an IESO-ledd Integrated R Regional Resource Pllanning (IRR RP) process, or the transm mitter-led Reggional Infrastrructure Plan (RIP) processs (wires solution), orr whether bothh are requiredd. 2. REGIONAL ISSUE/ TR RIGGER The Needs Assessment A fo or the Chathaam-Kent/Lambton/Sarnia R Region was trriggered in response to the Ontario Energy Board’s (OEB) Regional R Infraastructure Plaanning processs approved iin August 20013. To prioriitize and manage the regional plannning processs, Ontario’s 212 regions weere assigned to one of thrree groups - G Group 1 Regions are being review wed first. Thee Chatham-Keent/Lambton//Sarnia Regioon belongs to Group 3. Thhe Needs Assessment for Chatham-Kent/Lambto on/Sarnia Reg gion was trigggered on Aprril 13, 2016 aand was comppleted on June 12, 201 16. 3. SC COPE OF NEEDS ASS SESSMENT T The scope of this Needs Assessment A was w limited to o the next 10 yyears as per thhe recommenndations of thee Planning Pro ocess Workinng Group Repport to the OE EB. The scope of the Need ds Assessmen nt includes a review of ttransmission system capaability whichh covers transformer station capaccity, transmisssion circuit thermal t capaccity, voltage pperformance and load resttoration. System reliaability, operaational issues and asset repplacement pllans were alsoo briefly reviewed as parrt of this Needs Assesssment. Needs emerg ging over the next 10 yearrs and requirin ng coordinateed regional pllanning may bbe further asssessed as part of the IE ESO-led Scop ping Assessmment and/or IR RRP, or in thee next planninng cycle. If reequired, an IR RRP will develop a 20 0-year strateg gic direction for fo the Region n 4. IN NPUTS/DAT TA Study team m participantss, including representative r es from LDC Cs, the IESO O, and Hydrro One transsmission provided in nformation foor the Chathaam-Kent/Lam mbton/Sarnia Region. Thee informationn included: pplanning activities alrready underw way, historicall load, load forecast, fo conseervation and demand mannagement (CDDM) and distributed generation (DG) ( information, system m reliability performancee, operationaal issues andd major equipment approaching a end-of-life. e 5. ASSESSMEN NT METHO ODOLOGY Y The assessmment’s primarry objective was w to identiffy the electriccal infrastructture needs inn the Region over the study periodd (2015 – 20224). The asseessment revieewed availablle informationn and load foorecasts and iincluded single contin ngency analyssis to identify y needs. Pagee | 4
Needs Assessment Rep port – Chatham m-Kent/Lambton/Sarnia Regioon Junee 12, 2016 6. RESULTS Transmissio on Capacity Needs A. 230/115 kV Autotranssformer Capaccity Baseed on the grooss regional-coincident load forecast, thhe 230/115 kV V autotransforrmers capacitty (Scott TS) supplying thhe Region iss adequate ovver the studyy period for the loss of a single 230//115 kV autootransformer in the Regionn. B. 230 kV Transmission Lines Baseed on the grooss regional-ccoincident looad forecast, the 230 kV ccircuits supplying the Reggion are adeqquate over thee study periodd for the loss of a single 2330 kV circuit in the Regionn. C. 115 kV Transmission Lines Baseed on the grooss regional-ccoincident looad forecast, the 115 kV ccircuits supplying the Reggion are adeqquate over thee study periodd for the loss of a single 1115 kV circuit in the Regionn. D. 230 kV and 115 kV Connection Facilities Loadings at Kentt TS exceed their transform mer 10-Day L Long Term R Rating (LTR) in 2016 based on the net load forecast.. System Reliiability, Operation and Restoration Needs N A. Load Seecurity Baseed on the gross reggional-coinciddent load forecast annd the exiisting transm mission conffiguration, loaad security crriteria can be met over the study period.. B. Load Reestoration Baseed on the gross regionnal-coincidentt load forecaasts with thhe use of eexisting transsmission infraastructure, resstoration criteeria can be meet over the stuudy period. C. Voltage Performancee Undder gross regional-coinciddent peak loaad conditions, post-continngency voltagge at all trannsformer statiions in the reggion meet Maarket Rule reqquirements. D. Bulk Poower System Performance in the Regionn Baseed on the asssumed system m study condditions, no buulk power syystem issue w was identifiedd in the Reggion. The IESO might unddertake planniing study to aaccess the adeequacy of thee bulk power system withh different sysstem conditioons. Aging Infra astructure / Replacement R t Plan During the study s period, plans to replaace aged equiipment at stattions and seveeral transmisssion circuits w will take place. Furtheer details of these investments can be fo ound in Sectioon 6.3 of this report. 7. RECOMMENDATIONS S Based on the findings off the Needs Assessment, th he study team m recommendss Hydro One transmissionn and the relevant LDCs to develop p a local plan to address th hermal overloaad of transforrmer T3 at Keent TS. Pagee | 5
Needss Assessment Report - Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reggion June 12, 2016 TAB BLE OF CONTENTS S Need ds Assessmen nt Executivee Summary ................................................................................. 4 List of Figures an nd Tables ……………… ……………… ………………………… ……………....7 1 Introduction n ..................................................................................................................... 8 2 Regional Isssue / Triggerr .................................................................................................. 8 3 Scope of Neeeds Assessm ment............................................................................................ 9 3.11 Chatham-K Kent/Lambto on/Sarnia Reegion Descripption and Coonnection Configurationn ............................................................................................................................................. 9 4 Inputs and Data ............................................................................................................. 12 4.1 1 Load Foreccast .............................................................................................................. 13 5 Assessment Methodolog gy ............................................................................................. 13 6 Results ........................................................................................................................... 14 6.1 1 Transm mission Systeem Capacity y Needs ................................................................. 14 6.1.1 230 kV and 115 5 kV Autotraansformers ............................................................ 14 6.1.2 230 kV Transmission Lines ............................................................................. 14 6.1.3 115 kV Transmission Lines ............................................................................. 14 6.1.4 230 kV and 115 kV Connecttion Facilitiees ...................................................... 14 6.2 2 System m Reliability,, Operation and Restorattion Review .................................... 15 6.2.1 Load d Security .................................................................................................... 15 6.2.2 Load d Restoration n ............................................................................................... 15 6.2.3 Voltage Perform mance ........................................................................................ 16 6.2.4 Bulk k Power Systtem Perform mance in the Region ............................................. 16 6.3 3 Aging Infrastructurre and Replaacement Plann of Major Equipment .................... 16 7 Recommend dations ......................................................................................................... 17 8 References ..................................................................................................................... 17 Appeendix A: Loaad Forecasts ................................................................................................ 18 Appeendix B: Key y Terms and Definitions ............................................................................ 21 Appeendix C: Acrronyms ........................................................................................................ 23 Page | 6
Needss Assessment Report – Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reegion Juune 12, 2016 LIST T OF FIGU URES Figurre 1: Map off Chatham-KKent/Lambton n/Sarnia Reggion ................................................... 9 Figurre 2: Single-Line diagram m – Chatham m-Kent/Lammbton/Sarnia Region ........................ 11 LIST T OF TAB BLES Tablee 1: Study teeam participaants for Chattham-Kent/LLambton/Sarrnia Region ................... 8 Tablee 2: Hydro One and custtomer assets in Chatham m-Kent/Lambbton/Sarnia Region...... 10 Tablee 3 : Gas-fireed generationn output levels assumedd for Needs Assessment ................. 12 Tablee 4 : CDM fo orecast for th he Chatham-- Kent/Lambbton/Sarnia Region ......................... 18 Tablee 5: Chathamm-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia regional coiincidental load forecast ................... 19 Tablee 6 : Chathamm-Kent/Lam mbton/Sarniaa regional noon-coincidenntal load foreecast ......... 20 Page | 7
Needss Assessment Report – Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reegion Juune 12, 2016 1 INTRODUC CTION This Needs Assesssment reporrt provides a descriptionn of the analyysis to identtify needs thaat may be emerging g in the Chaatham-Kent//Lambton/Saarnia (the Region) overr the next teen yearss. The deveelopment off the Needs Assessmennt report is in accordannce with thhe regional planning g process as set out in th he Ontario E nergy Boarrd’s (OEB) Transmissioon Systeem Code (TSSC) and Disttribution Sysstem Code ( DSC) requirrements andd the Planninng Proceess Working g Group (PPW WG) Report to the OEB. The purpose of this Needss Assessmen nt report is to: consideer the inforrmation from m plann ning activitiies already underway; undertake an assesssment of thhe Chatham m- Kent//Lambton/Saarnia Region n to identify near term annd/or emergiing needs inn the area; annd determmine if thesse needs req quire a “loccalized” wirees only soluution(s) in the near-term m and/o or a coordinaated regionaal planning assessment. Where a loccal wires onnly solution is necesssary to addrress the need ds, Hydro On ne, as transm mitter, with LDCs or other connectinng custo omer(s) willl further undertake pllanning asssessments to develop options annd recom mmend soluttion(s). For needs that reequire furtheer regional pllanning and coordinationn, the Independent Electricity System Operator (thee IESO) will initiate the Scopinng Assesssment proccess to deterrmine wheth her an IESO O-led Integrrated Regional Resourcce Plann ning (IRRP)) process, or the transsmitter-led Regional Innfrastructuree Plan (RIP P) proceess (wires so olution), or both are requ uired. This report was prepared by Hydro One (Lead Transm mitter) with input from the Chatham m- Kent//Lambton/Saarnia Region n Needs Asssessment stuudy team listted in Table 1. The repoort captu ures the resu ults of the asssessment based on infoormation proovided by LDCs and thhe IESO O. Tablee 1: Study tea am participa ants for Chattham-Kent/L Lambton/Sarrnia Region No. Organ nizations 1. Hydro On ne Networks Inc. (Lead Transmitter) 2. Independeent Electricitty System Operator p 3. Bluewaterr Power Disttribution Corrporation 4. Entegrus Power Liness Inc. 5. Hydro On ne Networks Inc. (Distrib bution) 2 REGIONA AL ISSUE / TRIGGE ER The Needs Assessment for the Chatham m-Kent/Lambbton/Sarnia Region wass triggered in respo onse to the Ontario Enerrgy Board’s (OEB) Regiional Infrasttructure Plannning processs appro oved in August 2013. To prioritizze and mannage the reggional plannning process, Page | 8
Needss Assessment Report – Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reegion Juune 12, 2016 Ontarrio’s 21 regiions were asssigned to one of three groups, where Group 1 Regions arre being g reviewed first. The Region falls into Groupp 3. The Neeeds Assessm ment for this Regio on began on April 13, 20 016 and wass completed o n June 12, 2016. 3 SCOPE OF F NEEDS ASSESSM MENT This Needs Asssessment co overs the Chatham-Kennt/Lambton//Sarnia Reggion over an assessment period of 10 yearrs, from 201 15 to 2024. The scope of the Needs Assessmennt includes a review w of transm mission systeem connectiion facility capability which coverrs transfformer statio on capacity,, transmissio on circuit thermal capaccity, voltage performancce and load restorattion. System m reliability, operationall issues andd asset replaacement planns were also briefly reviewed ass part of this Needs Asseessment. 3.1 Chatham-Keent/Lambton/Sarnia Reegion Descrription and Connection n Configuratio on The region includ des the munnicipalities off Lambton S hores and Chatham-Keent, as well as the townships of Petrolia, Plympton-W Wyoming, Brooke-Alviinston, Daw wn-Euphemiaa, Ennisskillen, St. Clair, Warwiick, and Villlages of Oil Springs andd Point Edw ward. The areea is borrdered by thee London area r to the easst and Windssor-Essex to the southweest. Figurre 1 illustratees the approx ximate study y area. Fig gure 1: Map p of Chatha am-Kent/Laambton/Sarn nia Region Page | 9
Needss Assessment Report – Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reegion Juune 12, 2016 Electtricity supply y for the Reegion is prov vided througgh a networkk of 230 kVV and 115 kVV transmmission linees. The bulk k of the electrical suppply is transsmitted throough 230 kV V circuits (N21W, N22W, L24 4L, L26L, W44LC and W45LS) tow wards Buchaanan TS. This Regioon also con ntains a nummber of inteerconnectionns with neigghboring Michigan Statte (B3NN, L4D and L51D) Listed in Table 2 and shown n in Figure 2 are Hydro One transm mission and transmissionn- conneected custom mers’ assets in the Chath ham-Kent/Laambton/Sarnnia Region. Tablee 2: Hydro One and custo omer assets in Chatham-K Kent/Lambtton/Sarnia Region H Hydro One C Customer 115 kV Circcuits 230 kV Circu uits T Transformer Trransformer Stations Stations N1S, N4S, N6C, N7C, N6S, N7S, V41N, V Scott T TS, Lambtonn TS, Forest Jura HVDS, S2N N, N5K, K2Z V43N N, L23N, L27V, L Kent TS, Duart TS, mer CTS Custom #1, L25V V, L37G, L38G, L Modelland TS, Custom mer CTS #2, C, L29C, C31, L28C Wansttead TS, St. Custom mer CTS #3, W44LLC, W4 45LS, Andreew TS, Custom mer CTS #4, S47C C, L24L, L26L, L Walla ceburg TS Custom mer CTS #5, N21W W, N22W Custom mer CTS #6, Custom mer CTS #7, Custom mer CTS #8 Page | 10
Needs Assessment Rep port - Chatham-Ken nt/Lambton/Sarniaa Region June 12, 20116 Leg gend CTS #7 500 kV circuit 230 kV cirr cuit 115 kV circuit Autotransfformer CTS #4 N.O. Normally Open point Study Are ea N1S N4S St Andrew TS To Bruce CTS #8 Scott TS C C Buch hanan TS N6 B562L B563L N7 N6S nsAlta Sarnia Tran Modeland TS Wond derland TS N7S CGS N21W Interc connection to Michi gan U.S. B3N V41N N22W St S Clair Power V43N CGS L23N CTS #5 Ongoing Project CTS #1 N S2N W2S Nova a SS N.O. CTS #2 N N5K W Wanstead TS Forest CTS #6 Land don Strathroy S Jura DS CG GS TS CTS #3 Buchanan L27V DESN L25V L37G W4 2L Greenfield G Wallaceburg TS L38G Energy Centre W43 L C L51D W44 L Intercconnections L4D 5 LS N.O. W 4 to Miichigan U .S. L24L L28C L29C L26L East Lake St. Edgeware TS Clair Wind Farm Lambton TS K2Z To Lauzon TS GSPC CGS Longwood TS Kent TS N582L To o Nanticoke South Kent C31 S Wind 5L W4 Farm C21J W44LC C22J Spence S S Duart TS S47 7C To Lauzon C23Z TS C24Z eau Windfarm Erie Spence Windfarm Chatham SS Fig gure 2: Single-L Line diagram – Chatham-Kent/Lambton/Saarnia Region Page | 11
Needss Assessment Report - Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reggion June 12, 2016 4 INPUTSS AND DATA In orrder to connduct this Needs Asseessment, stuudy team participants provided thhe follow wing inform mation to Hyd dro One: LDCs provid ded historiccal summer (2012 – 20014) as weell as summ mer gross loaad fo orecast (2015 5 – 2024) IE ESO provideed: a.. Historiccal regional coincident peak load andd station nonn-coincidentt peak load b. List of existing reliaability and operational isssues c.. Gas genneration assuumptions (Seee Table 3) d. Conserv vation and Demand Management (CDM) andd Distributedd Generatioon (DG) daata Hydro One (T Transmission n) provided transformer,, station andd circuit ratinngs Hydro One (T Transmission n) provided existing reliability and operation isssues Any relevantt planning in nformation, including planned transsmission andd distributioon in nvestments are provided by Hydro One (Transm mission) and LDCs Tablee 3 : Gas-fireed generation n output leveels assumed f or Needs Assessment Maximu um continuous Gas Gene erators in Chaatham‐ summmer outputs Kent/Lambton/Sarnia area (MW) Greeenfield Energyy Centre 1001 TransAlta Sarnia 435 St. Clair Power CG GS 484 Greeenfield South Power Corpo oration (GSPC C) 283 Based d on the histtorical inform mation provided, Chathaam-Kent/Lam mbton/Sarniia Region is a summmer peaking region. As such, the Neeeds Assessm ment was connducted baseed on summeer peak load and sttudies condiitions. Furth her, as part o f Hydro One’s regularr sustainmennt assessment, Wan nstead TS has been identtified as reacching end-off-life and is scheduled foor a com mplete statiion rebuild. Prior to laaunch of thhe Needs Assessment study, LDC Cs conneected to the existing Waanstead TS and Hydro One had com mmitted to rebuilding thhe existiing Wansteaad TS from the current 115 kV suppply to 230 kV supply. The project is currently being assessed by y the IESO as part its System Imppact Assessm ment processs (CAAA ID 2015-5 545). As su uch, the Neeeds Assessmment assumeed Wansteadd TS will be conveerted to a 230 kV statiion. Please refer to Secction 6.3 forr more detaiils about this conveersion projecct. Page | 12
Needss Assessment Report – Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reegion Juune 12, 2016 4.1 Load Foreca ast Basedd on data provided by the study team, the suummer grosss coincidennt load in thhe Regioon is expecteed to grow at an averagee rate of appproximately 1.3% annuallly from 20115 – 20224. Factoring g in the contributions off CDM and DG, the sum mmer net cooincident loaad in thee Region is expected too grow at an average r ate of approoximately 0.2% annuallly from 2015 – 2024 4. Pleasse refer to Ap ppendix A fo or the load fforecasts utillized for thiss Needs Asseessment. 5 ASSESSME ENT MET THODOLO OGY The following meethodology and assumpttions are madde in this Neeeds Assessm ment: 1. The assessmeent is based on summer peak loads. 2. Load forecassts are proviided by the Region’s LDCs using historical 2015 summeer peak loads as reference points. 3. For the purpo ose of Needs d Assessmen nt, 2014 hisstorical load levels weree assumed foor trransmission connected in ndustrial cusstomers throuughout the study period. 4. The historicaal peak loadss at Hydro One’s statioons are adjussted for extrreme weatheer coonditions according to Hydro One methodologyy. 5. The LDC’s lo oad forecastt is translateed into load growth ratees and is appplied onto thhe historical, exttreme weather adjusted, reference pooints. 6. Accounting for (2), (3), (4), and (5 5) above, a gross load forecast annd a net loaad foorecast are developed. The gross load foreca st is used to develop a worst casse sccenario to iddentify needss. Where theere are issuess, the net forrecast, whichh accounts foor CDM and DG G, is analyzeed to determiine if the neeeds can be deferred. A gross and net non n-coincidentt peak loadd forecast was used to perform thhe analysis for sections 6.1.4 A gross and net reg gional coincident peak load forecaast was useed to perform m the analyssis for sectio ons 6.1.1 to 6.1.3, 6.2.1, 6.2.2 and 6.22.4 7. Review impaact of any on-going an nd planned developmennt projects inn the Regioon du uring the stu udy period. 8. Review and assess impaact of any critical/majoor elements planned/ideentified to be reeplaced at thhe end of their useful lifee such as trannsformers, cables, and sttations. 9. Station capaccity adequaccy is assesseed by compparing the non–coincideent peak loaad with the statio on’s normal planning su upply capacitty by assum ming a 90% laagging poweer faactor for staations withou ut low-voltaage capacitorr banks or ththe historical low voltagge power factor,, whichever is more con nservative. Normal plannning supplyy capacity foor trransformer stations in th his Region is determineed by the suummer 10 – Day Limiteed Time Rating (LTR). Page | 13
Needss Assessment Report – Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reegion Juune 12, 2016 10. Transmission n adequacy assessment iss primarily based on the following crriteria: Regional load is set too the forecassted regionall coincident peak load. With all elements in service, thee system is to be capabble of suppllying forecast demand with equipm ment loading g within conntinuous ratiings and vooltages withiin normal raange. With one element outt of service, the system i s to be capaable of suppllying forecast demand with circuit loading with hin their longg term emerrgency (LTE E) ratings annd transform mers within thheir 10 – Daay LTR. All voltag ges must be within pre and post coontingency ranges as peer the Ontariio Resource and Transm mission Assesssment Criteeria (ORTAC C). The systeem to meet load securitty criteria ass per the OR RTAC, speccifically, witth one elemeent out of serrvice, no mo ore than 150 MW of loadd is lost by configurationn. With two o elements out of serviice, no morre than 600 MW of loaad is lost by configuraation. The systeem is capab ble of meetiing the loadd restorationn timeframees as per thhe ORTAC. 6 RESULTS Thiis section summarizes the results of the Needs Assessm ment in thee Chatham–– Kennt/Lambton//Sarnia Region. 6.1 Transmisssion System m Capacity Needs 6.1.1 230 kV and 115 kV Autotransfformers The 230/115 kV autotransforrmers (Scottt TS) supplyying the Regiion are adeqquate over thhe study y period for the loss of a single 230/1 115 kV autottransformer in the Regioon. 6.1.2 230 kV Transmission n Lines The 230 kV circuits are adequate over the study peeriod for thee loss of a single 230 kV V circuit in the Reg gion. 6.1.3 115 kV Transmission n Lines The 115 kV linees supplying g the Region n are radiall single circcuit lines. These 115 kV V circuits have adeq quate capaciity over the study periodd. 6.1.4 230 kV and 115 kV Connection Facilities A staation capacity y assessmen nt was perforrmed over thhe study periiod for the 2330 kV and Page | 14
Needss Assessment Report – Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reegion Juune 12, 2016 115 kV transformmer stations in the Regio on using the summer stattion non- cooincident peaak load forecasts. Kent TS T3/T4 is forecastedd to exceed its 10 – Dayy LTR in 20016 based onn the net loaad forecast (approximately 119% % Summer 10 – Day LT TR in 2016). All thhe other TSs in the Chaatham-Kent//Lambton/Saarnia Regionn is forecastted to remaiin withiin their norm mal supply caapacity durin ng the study period. 6.2 System Reliability, Operation and Restorattion Review w 6.2.1 Load Seccurity Based d on the gro oss regional coincident peak load forrecast, with all transmission facilitiees in–seervice and co oincident witth an outagee of the largeest local generation unitss, all facilitiees are within appliccable ratingss. The largeest local genneration unitt is a 230 kV–connecteed Green nfield Energ gy Centre unit on the 2300 kV. Based d on the gro oss regionall-coincident load forecaast, the loss of one elem ment will noot resultt in load innterruption greater than n 150 MW by configuuration, by pplanned loaad curtailment or by y load rejecction. In addition, undeer these connditions, all facilities arre withiin their appliicable ratings. Based d on the grooss regional coincident load forecasst, the loss of two elem ments will noot resultt in load innterruption greater than n 600 MW by configuuration, by pplanned loaad curtailment or by y load rejecction. In addition, undeer these connditions, all facilities arre withiin their appliicable ratings. Thereefore, load security criteeria for the Region are met. 6.2.2 Load Resstoration Basedd on the gross coinciident load forecast at Modeland TS, Wansttead TS annd Wond derland TS, by the end of study perriod, the loadd interruptedd is expectedd to approacch 240 MW for the loss of doub ble-circuit 230 kV line N21W and N22W. Pressently, N21W W can be sectionaliized and loaad can be restored from either Scottt TS or Bucchanan TS by use of existing switches on N21W. Witth the switching capabiilities, magnnitude of loaad loss can be reducced from thee peak level of over 2400 MW to lesss than 150 MW within 4 hourss. The remaiining load caan be resuppplied within t he 4-8 hourrs timeframee by means of load transfers annd/or switch hing alternaate feeder suupplies to neighbouringg, unaffecteed transfformer statiions. Hydroo One will continue too monitor load growthh at stationns Page | 15
Needss Assessment Report – Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reegion Juune 12, 2016 conneected to N2 21W/N22W and updatee the restorration plan on an ongooing basis as appro opriate. Based d on the assumed load levels for the transmisssion-conneccted industriial customerrs conneected to N6 6S and N7S,, the load in nterrupted will exceed 150 MW foor the loss of double-circuit 23 30kV line N6 6S and N7S.. Hydro Onee crews locaated in Sarniaa will be ablle u to reespond as quickly as possible to restore loadd to meet thhe 4 hours and 8 hourrs restorration criterria. It is thee customer’s accountabbility to enssure that thhere is onsitte emergency supply for essentiial load or arrrange for baackup supplyy from otherr sources. Thereefore, load reestoration crriteria for thee Region aree met. 6.2.3 Voltage Performancce Undeer gross regiional coincident peak lo oad conditioons, post-coontingency voltage at a ll transfformer statio ons in the reg gion meet Market Rule r equirements. 6.2.4 Bulk Pow wer System Performancce in the Reegion Based d on the stuudy assumpttions listed in Section 4, no issue was identiffied for bulkk poweer system in the Region. It is noted that, howeveer, there aree a number of large scale comb bined-cycle gas plants in n the Sarniaa-Lambton a rea and gass-fired generration outpuut couldd vary depen nding on bro oader systemm conditions such as exppected load growth in the proviince or availlability of otther generatiion resourcees. Moreoverr, as previouusly noted inn Section 3.1, the Chatham-Keent/Lambton n/Sarnia Reggion is connnected to thee US markeet throu ugh interconn nections in Sarnia and Lambton. Im mport and expport generation levels onn the in nterties havee a significan nt impact on the bulk traansmission system. Recoognizing gass- fired generation output and import/expo ort levels aree important parameters for the bulkk systemm performance for this Region, thee IESO migght undertakee further stuudy to assess the bulk system adequacy un nder differennt system coonditions. At the launchh of the saidd studyy, Hydro One will work with the IES SO and soliccit inputs froom other enttities such as large transmission connected d industrial cuustomers as required. 6.3 Aging Inffrastructuree and Repla acement Plaan of Majorr Equipment Hydrro One reviewed the su ustainment and developpment initiaatives that are currentlyy plann ned for the replacemen nt of any au utotransform mers, power transformerrs and highh- voltage cables. As mention ned in earlieer section, the existingg Wanstead TS will bee refurb bished, with h standard 50 0/66/83 MVA A transformeers and is sccheduled to be completedd in 20 018. Prior to o launch of this study, th he LDCs connnecting to Wanstead TS and Hydroo One had discussed and com mmitted to converting t he station from 115 kV V to 230 kV V Page | 16
Needss Assessment Report – Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reegion Juune 12, 2016 conneecting to 23 30 kV circuuits N21W and N22W. The Needss Assessmennt study hadd included this com mmitted projeect in the areea network s etup. The following su ustainment plans do no ot affect thee results of this Needs Assessmennt study y, but are inccluded for co ompleteness:: The existing g St Andrew ws TS will be refurbisshed with standard 50//66/83 MVA A transformerss and is scheduled to be completed inn 2023. The existing g Scott TS will be refurbbished, autottransformer T5 will be replaced likee- for-like withh a 250MVA A unit and is scheduled too be completted in 2022. 7 RECOMM MENDATIO ONS Bassed on the findings of the Needs Assessment, t he study teeam agrees that Scopingg Asssessment is not required at this time.. Forr thermal overload of transformer T3 at Kentt TS, considdering there is adequatee reg gional supplyy capacity to o accommod date expectedd load growtth, it is the study team’ss recommendatio on that no fu urther region nal coordinaation is requuired. Furtheer, the studyy team m recommen nds Hydro One transmission and thhe relevant distributors to develop a local plan (“Keent TS – T3 Capacity Limmitation”) foor this need. 8 REFEREN NCES i) Planning Proccess Workin ng Group (PPPWG) Reporrt to the Boaard: The Proccess for Regional Infrrastructure Planning in Ontario – Maay 17, 2013 ii) IE ESO Ontario o Resource and Transmisssion Assesssment Criterria (ORTAC)) – Issue 5.00 Page | 17
Needss Assessment Report - Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reggion June 12, 2016 APP PENDIX A: LOAD FORECAS STS As noted in Secction 5, consservation annd demand managementt (CDM) annd distributeed generration (DG)) projects forecast fo info ormation proovided by the IESO were used to determmine the neet load forecast. The fo orecasted CD DM achieveement in thhe Chatham – Kent// Lambton/S Sarnia area is summarizzed in Tablee 4 and it represents thhe percentagge reducction applied d to gross peak demand at each statioon. Tablee 4 : CDM fo orecast for th he Chatham- Kent/Lambtton/Sarnia Region 2015 2016 201 17 2018 2019 20 020 2021 2022 2023 2024 CDM M 0.96% 2.04% 2.74 4% 3.84% 4.86% 5.6 68% 6.25% 6.83% 7..22% 7.72% The DG informattion shown in Table 5 and Table 6 reflects all generation contracts witth the IESO in the Chatham – Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia area: FIT, microFIT and CHPSOP P. Furth her, the DG information represents th he cumulativve, effectivee capacity too meeting areea peak demand. Page | 18
Needs Assessment Rep port - Chatham-Ken nt/Lambton/Sarniaa Region June 12, 20116 Tab ble 5: Chatham-K Kent/Lambton/S Sarnia regional coincidental load d forecast Historicall Forecast Station Data 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 20199 2020 2021 2022 2023 20 024 Duart TS Coincidental Gross Load 14.66 14.87 15.09 15.30 15.52 2 15.74 15.97 16.20 16.43 16..66 Duart TS Coincidental CDM 0.14 0.30 0.41 0.59 0.75 0.89 1.00 1.11 1.19 1.229 Duart TS DG 0.07 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.225 Duart TS Coincidental Ne e t Load 14.46 14.45 14.50 14.42 14.46 14.52 2 14.60 14.72 14.84 14.99 15..12 Forest Jura DS Coincidental Gross Load 19.69 20.03 20.37 20.72 21.07 7 21.43 21.80 22.17 22.55 22..93 Forest Jura DS Coincidental CDM 0.19 0.41 0.56 0.80 1.02 1.22 1.36 1.51 1.63 1.777 Forest Jura DS DG 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.002 Forest Jura DS Coincidental Ne e t Load 19.36 19.49 19.60 19.80 19.91 20.03 3 20.20 20.42 20.64 20.90 21..14 Kent TS T1/T2 Coincidental Gross Load 71.05 72.70 74.38 76.11 77.88 8 79.70 81.56 83.46 85.42 87..42 Kent TS T1/T2 Coincidental CDM 0.68 1.48 2.04 2.92 3.78 4.53 5.10 5.70 6.16 6.775 Kent TS T1/T2 DG 0.53 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.220 Kent TS T1/T2 Coincidental Ne e t Load 69.45 69.84 70.01 71.14 71.98 72.90 0 73.96 75.25 76.56 78.05 79..47 Kent TS T3/T4 Coincidental Gross Load 40.82 41.72 42.64 43.58 44.55 5 45.54 46.56 47.60 48.67 49..76 Kent TS T3/T4 Coincidental CDM 0.39 0.85 1.17 1.67 2.16 2.59 2.91 3.25 3.51 3.884 Kent TS T3/T4 DG 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.116 Kent TS T3/T4 Coincidental Ne e t Load 39.95 40.27 40.71 41.31 41.75 42.23 3 42.79 43.49 44.19 45.00 45..76 Lambton TS Coincidental Gross Load 62.25 62.87 63.49 64.12 64.76 6 65.40 66.05 66.70 67.36 68..03 Lambton TS Coincidental CDM 0.60 1.28 1.74 2.46 3.14 3.72 4.13 4.55 4.86 5.225 Lambton TS DG 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 Lambton TS Coincidental Ne e t Load 61.64 61.66 61.59 61.75 61.66 61.61 1 61.68 61.92 62.15 62.50 62..78 Modeland TS Coincidental Gross Load 82.93 83.27 83.61 83.96 84.30 0 84.65 84.99 85.34 85.69 86..04 Modeland TS Coincidental CDM 0.80 1.70 2.29 3.22 4.09 4.81 5.32 5.82 6.18 6.664 Modeland TS DG 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.116 Modeland TS Coincidental Ne e t Load 82.59 82.11 81.41 81.16 80.57 80.05 5 79.67 79.52 79.36 79.35 79..24 St. Andrews TS Coincidental Gross Load 63.59 63.59 63.59 63.59 63.59 9 63.59 63.59 63.59 63.59 63..59 St. Andrews TS Coincidental CDM 0.61 1.30 1.74 2.44 3.09 3.61 3.98 4.34 4.59 4.991 St. Andrews TS DG 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.001 St. Andrews TS Coincidental Ne e t Load 63.59 62.98 62.29 61.84 61.14 60.50 0 59.97 59.61 59.25 59.00 58..68 Wallaceburg TS Coincidental Gross Load 27.67 28.32 28.97 29.65 30.34 4 31.04 31.76 32.50 33.25 34..03 Wallaceburg TS Coincidental CDM 0.27 0.58 0.79 1.14 1.47 1.76 1.99 2.22 2.40 2.663 Wallaceburg TS DG 0.43 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 6.09 6.09 6.09 6.09 6.009 Wallaceburg TS Coincidental Ne e t Load 27.05 26.98 26.80 27.24 27.57 27.93 3 23.18 23.68 24.19 24.76 25..31 Wanstead TS Coincidental Gross Load 28.70 29.17 29.65 30.14 30.63 3 31.13 31.64 32.16 32.69 33..22 Wanstead TS Coincidental CDM 0.28 0.60 0.81 1.16 1.49 1.77 1.98 2.20 2.36 2.556 Wanstead TS DG 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.338 Wanstead TS Coincidental Ne e t Load 28.24 28.05 28.20 28.46 28.60 28.76 6 28.98 29.28 29.59 29.95 30..28 CTS #1 Transmission Connected Industrial Customer 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.994 CTS #2 Transmission Connected Industrial Customer 20.82 20.82 20.82 20.82 20.82 20.82 2 20.82 20.82 20.82 20.82 20..82 CTS #3 Transmission Connected Industrial Customer 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 0 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29..00 CTS #4 Transmission Connected Industrial Customer 112.95 112.95 112.95 112.95 112.95 112.955 112.95 112.95 112.95 112.95 112 2.95 CTS #5 Transmission Connected Industrial Customer 30.89 30.89 30.89 30.89 30.89 30.89 9 30.89 30.89 30.89 30.89 30..89 CTS #6 Transmission Connected Industrial Customer 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.447 CTS #7 Transmission Connected Industrial Customer 53.89 53.89 53.89 53.89 53.89 53.89 9 53.89 53.89 53.89 53.89 53..89 CTS #8 Transmission Connected Industrial Customer 46.71 46.71 46.71 46.71 46.71 46.71 1 46.71 46.71 46.71 46.71 46..71 Page | 19
Needs Assessment Rep port – Chatham-Keent/Lambton/Sarniaa Region June 12, 2 016 Tab ble 6 : Chatham--Kent/Lambton//Sarnia regional non-coincidenta al load forecast Historica al Forecast Station Data 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Duart TS Non‐coincidental G ross Load 18.26 18.55 18.72 18.97 19.3 33 19.69 19.94 20.19 20.43 20.68 Duart TS Non‐coincidenta al CDM 0.18 0.38 0.51 0.73 0.94 4 1.12 1.25 1.38 1.47 1.60 Duart TS DG 0.07 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Duart TS Non‐coincidental Net Load 14.46 18.01 18.10 17.96 17.99 18.1 14 18.32 18.44 18.56 18.71 18.83 Forest Jura DS Non‐coincidental G ross Load 22.58 23.05 23.29 23.70 24.1 19 24.75 25.09 25.50 25.82 26.22 Forest Jura DS Non‐coincidenta al CDM 0.22 0.47 0.64 0.91 1.17 7 1.41 1.57 1.74 1.86 2.02 Forest Jura DS DG 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 2 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Forest Jura DS Non‐coincidental Net Load 19.36 22.35 22.56 22.63 22.77 23.0 00 23.33 23.51 23.75 23.94 24 4.18 Kent TS T1/T2 Non‐coincidental G ross Load 107.57 114.81 117.04 119.46 122.1 16 124.89 127.48 130.10 132.77 13 35.49 Kent TS T1/T2 Non‐coincidenta al CDM 1.03 2.34 3.21 4.59 5.93 3 7.10 7.97 8.88 9.58 10.46 Kent TS T1/T2 DG 0.53 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 0 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 Kent TS T1/T2 Non‐coincidental Net Load 69.45 106.00 111.26 112.63 113.66 115.0 02 116.58 118.30 120.02 121.98 12 23.83 Kent TS T3/T4 Non‐coincidental G ross Load 61.87 65.59 66.79 68.11 69.6 62 71.14 72.55 73.98 75.42 76.90 Kent TS T3/T4 Non‐coincidenta al CDM 0.59 1.34 1.83 2.62 3.38 8 4.04 4.54 5.05 5.44 5.93 Kent TS T3/T4 DG 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 6 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Kent TS T3/T4 Non‐coincidental Net Load 39.95 61.11 64.08 64.80 65.33 66.0 08 66.93 67.85 68.76 69.82 70.81 Lambton TS Non‐coincidental G ross Load 71.39 72.21 72.55 73.18 74.2 29 75.37 76.00 76.60 77.15 77.72 Lambton TS Non‐coincidenta al CDM 0.69 1.47 1.99 2.81 3.61 1 4.28 4.75 5.23 5.57 6.00 Lambton TS DG 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lambton TS Non‐coincidental Net Load 61.64 70.71 70.73 70.56 70.37 70.6 68 71.09 71.25 71.37 71.59 71.72 Modeland TS Non‐coincidental G ross Load 100.71 101.71 102.71 103.71 104.7 71 104.71 104.71 104.71 104.71 10 04.71 Modeland TS Non‐coincidenta al CDM 0.97 2.08 2.81 3.98 5.08 8 5.95 6.55 7.15 7.56 8.08 Modeland TS DG 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 6 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Modeland TS Non‐coincidental Net Load 82.59 99.72 99.48 99.74 99.57 99.4 47 98.60 98.00 97.40 97.00 96.47 St. Andrews TS Non‐coincidental G ross Load 62.74 62.74 62.74 62.74 62.7 74 62.74 62.74 62.74 62.74 62.74 St. Andrews TS Non‐coincidenta al CDM 0.60 1.28 1.72 2.41 3.05 5 3.57 3.92 4.28 4.53 4.84 St. Andrews TS DG 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 St. Andrews TS Non‐coincidental Net Load 63.59 62.13 61.46 61.02 60.33 59.6 69 59.17 58.81 58.45 58.21 57.90 Wallaceburg TS Non‐coincidental G ross Load 41.86 42.84 43.86 44.80 45.8 82 46.95 48.10 49.19 50.28 51.40 Wallaceburg TS Non‐coincidenta al CDM 0.40 0.87 1.20 1.72 2.23 3 2.67 3.01 3.36 3.63 3.97 Wallaceburg TS DG 0.43 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 4 6.09 6.09 6.09 6.09 6.09 Wallaceburg TS Non‐coincidental Net Load 27.05 41.04 41.03 41.72 42.15 42.6 66 38.19 39.00 39.74 40.56 41.34 Wanstead TS Non‐coincidental G ross Load 34.10 34.68 35.29 35.68 36.2 22 36.99 37.75 38.30 38.83 39.34 Wanstead TS Non‐coincidenta al CDM 0.33 0.71 0.97 1.37 1.76 6 2.10 2.36 2.61 2.80 3.04 Wanstead TS DG 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 8 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Wanstead TS Non‐coincidental Net Load 28.24 33.40 33.59 33.95 33.94 34.0 08 34.51 35.01 35.31 35.65 35.93 CTS #1 Transmission Connected Ind dustrial Customer 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 4 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 7.94 CTS #2 Transmission Connected Ind dustrial Customer 20.82 20.82 20.82 20.82 20.82 20.8 82 20.82 20.82 20.82 20.82 20.82 CTS #3 Transmission Connected Ind dustrial Customer 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.0 00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 CTS #4 Transmission Connected Ind dustrial Customer 112.95 112.95 112.95 112.95 112.95 112.9 95 112.95 112.95 112.95 112.95 11 12.95 CTS #5 Transmission Connected Ind dustrial Customer 30.89 30.89 30.89 30.89 30.89 30.8 89 30.89 30.89 30.89 30.89 30.89 CTS #6 Transmission Connected Ind dustrial Customer 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 7 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 CTS #7 Transmission Connected Ind dustrial Customer 53.89 53.89 53.89 53.89 53.89 53.8 89 53.89 53.89 53.89 53.89 53.89 CTS #8 Transmission Connected Ind dustrial Customer 46.71 46.71 46.71 46.71 46.71 46.7 71 46.71 46.71 46.71 46.71 46.71 Page | 20
Needss Assessment Report - Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reggion June 12, 2016 APP PENDIX B: KEY TERMS AND D DEFINIITIONS Key terms and deefinitions asssociated with h this Needss Assessmennt are cited here. Norm mal Supply Capacity The maximum lo quipment maay be subjeccted to conttinuously oading that electrical eq underr nominal ambient condditions suchh that no acccelerated losss of equipm ment life would be expecteed. Coincident Peak k Load The electricity demand at in ndividual faccilities at thhe same poinnt in time when the total demand of the region orr system is att its maximuum. Conttingency The prevalence of abnormal conditions such that ellements of thhe power syystem are not av vailable. Consservation an nd Demand Managemeent (CDM) Progrrams aimed at using mo ore of one ty ype of energgy efficientlyy to replace an inefficiennt use of another to o reduce ov verall energy y use, and i nfluencing the amount or timing of custo omers’ use off electricity. Distrributed Genneration (DG G) Electtric power generation equipment that suppliess energy too nearby cuustomers witth generration capaciity typically ranging from m a few kW W to 25 MW. Grosss Load Amou unt of electtricity that must be gen nerated to meet all custtomers’ needds as well as delivery losses, not considerring any gen neration inittiatives suchh as CDM and DG. It is usuallly expressedd in MW or MVA. Limiited Time Rating (LTR R) A hig gher than nam meplate ratin ng that a tran nsformer cann tolerate forr a short period of time Loadd Forecast Prediiction of the load or dem mand customeers will makke on the elecctricity systeem Page | 21
Needss Assessment Report – Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reegion Juune 12, 2016 Net Load Net of generation n (e.g. CDM and DG) deeducted from m the Gross load Non--Coincident Peak Load d The maximum electricity deemand at an individual facility. Unnlike the coinncident peakk, non-ccoincident peeaks may occcur at differrent times foor different fa facilities. Peak k Load The maximum lo oad consumeed or producced by a uniit or group of units in a stated periood of tim me. It may be the maxim mum instantaaneous load or the maxim mum averagge load over a desiggnated interv val of time. Weatther Correccted Data Loadd data that is adjusted to account for extreme weeather condittions using an adjustmennt factorr. Page | 22
Needss Assessment Report – Chathaam-Kent/Lamb bton/Sarnia Reegion Juune 12, 2016 APP PENDIX C: ACRON NYMS BES Buulk Electric System BPS Buulk Power Syystem CDMM Coonservation and Demand d Managemeent CIA Cuustomer Imp pact Assessm ment CGS Cuustomer Gen nerating Stattion CTS Cuustomer Tran nsformer Staation DESNN Du ual Element Spot Netwo ork DG Diistributed Geeneration DSC Diistribution System Codee GTAA Grreater Toronnto Area IESO O In ndependent Electricity Sy ystem Operaator IRRPP In ntegrated Reg gional Resou urce Planninng kV Kiilovolt LDC Loocal Distribu ution Compaany LTR Liimited Time Rating LV Loow-voltage MW Megawatt MVA A Mega Volt-Am mpere NA Neeeds Assessm ment NERC No orth American Electric Reliability Corporation NGS Nu uclear Generrating Statio on NPCCC No ortheast Pow wer Coordinaating Counciil Inc. OEB On ntario Energ gy Board ORTA AC On ntario Resou urce and Traansmission Assessment Criteria PF Po ower Factor PPW WG Pllanning Proccess Working g Group RIP Reegional Infraastructure Pllanning SIA Sy ystem Impacct Assessmen nt SS Sw witching Staation TS Trransformer Station TSC Trransmission System Cod de ULTCC Un nder Load Tap Changer Page | 23
You can also read