London Market 101 Presented by Peter Montanaro, Head of Market Oversight and Delivery, Lloyd's - WSIA
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
London Market 101 Presented by Peter Montanaro, Head of Market Oversight and Delivery, Lloyd’s WSIA’s U40 2021 Webinar Series July 12, 2021
Lloyd’s in the eighteenth & nineteenth century • 1745 legal difference between insurance and gambling defined • 1772 from Coffee House to Society • 1843 Concept of “Lloyd’s member” introduced. • 1871 Statutory recognition of Lloyd’s - Lloyd’s Act 1871 • Development of the non-marine market 4 Classification: Confidential
Lloyd’s in the twentieth century • 1927 Lloyd’s Central Fund set up • 1996 Reconstruction & Renewal 5 Classification: Confidential
Complete confidence Why Lloyd’s? Robust financial strength Excellent financial security Lloyd’s Chain of Security AA- A+ £55bn £31bn Fitch Ratings Standard & Poor’s Syndicate level Members' funds (Very Strong) (Strong) assets at Lloyd’s A AA- £3bn A.M. Best (Excellent) Kroll Bond Rating Central assets* Agency (Strong) Gross written premium 2020 Annual Report, published March 2021 lloyds.com/annualresults2020 £35,466m *Central assets exclude subordinated debt liability and the callable layer. For more information please see the annual report. © Lloyd’s 2021 6
Writing international business To write non-marine insurance internationally, Lloyd’s needed to arrange: • Licensing as a single entity (e.g. “Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London”) • Meeting local financial requirements • Legal actions against Lloyd’s underwriters • Payment of taxes 7 Classification: Confidential
Global network Serving clients in 200 countries and territories Cross border reinsurance only US Cross border/onshore reinsurance and surplus lines insurance Cross-border/onshore reinsurance Onshore insurance/reinsurance licence © Lloyd’s 2021
Lloyd’s in the twenty first century • 2002 Chairman’s Strategy Group • 2013 Regulation by the PRA & FCA • 2019 Future at Lloyd’s Prospectus 9 Classification: Confidential
How the Lloyd’s market works Business flow The market Capital flow Customers Distribution channels 50 managing agents - managing syndicates Members transferring risk (capital providers) 350 brokers 76 syndicates - writing insurance and reinsurance Global commercial distributing business directly Trade capital organisations 427 service company 12 special purpose arrangements set up solely to Institutional capital Small and medium locations write a quota share of another syndicate sized enterprises Private capital (via 4,030 coverholder 2 syndicates in a box: writing innovative new members agents) Individuals locations business Other insurance groups The Corporation – Supporting the market 2020 Annual Report, published March 2021 lloyds.com/annualresults2020 © Lloyd’s 2021 10 Classification: Confidential
Sharing risk with leading insurance brands The Lloyd’s market is home to leading insurance brands © Lloyd’s 2021 11 lloyds.com/annualreport2018 Classification: Confidential
Partnering with global capital by source and location US insurance industry 2020 2019 Bermudian insurance industry UK insurance industry 5.4% 5.5% 8.3% 17.3% 8.5% 19.1% Japan insurance industry 10.5% 9.8% European insurance industry 14.9% 14.0% Private capital, limited & unlimited 9.2% 9.8% RoW insurance industry 9.6% 14.6% 9.8% 12.2% 10.2% 11.3% Worldwide non-insurance Middle/Far East insurance industry © Lloyd’s 2021 12 Classification: Confidential
Market Oversight and Performance Management • Delegated Underwriting Business • Capital and Planning Group • Market Oversight • Standards to Principles 13 Classification: Confidential
Coverholders: – an introduction Coverholder Community* Coverholders ǂ 4,031 Service Companiesǂ Who are they? No discretion 412 3% • Coverholders are insurance intermediaries appointed by a managing agent to bind risks on their behalf. Outside the Lloyd’s market they may be referred to as MGAs/MGUs. Coverholder Underwriting Permission* • Service companies are in-house coverholders that are owned by a managing agent • Coverholders can vary considerably in terms of size, product and complexity Prior submit 14% • Many brokers are also approved coverholders What do they do? Full authority Pre- determined • Coverholders’ authority to underwrite (bind) policies or pay claims is set out in an 24% rates outsourcing agreement called a Binding Authority (i.e. ‘binder’) 59% • Coverholders and Service Companies are primarily focussed on writing SME and consumer business – but some will write commercial lines Lloyd’s Premium** Lineslip… Coverholde Why do they matter? Treaty rs & Service • Coverholders and Service Companies represent 38% of Lloyd’s premium. They are a 22% Cos 38% local distribution channel and carry our brand US$44 bn • They provide an excellent route to access SME/Consumer business that would be 2020 D&F difficult or uneconomic to source via open market 37% • They are also an effective fast-track route to market for innovative new entities (e.g. parametric solutions) Lloyd’s Involvement Where are they based? 53 Managing Agents • Coverholders are mainly based in our key markets – especially North America, UK, Australia and Europe • Service Companies, especially those based on Lloyd’s overseas platforms, tend to write Global Reach local/regional reinsurance business – e.g. Asia and Middle East Operating in 60 countries/territories *Delegated Authorities team showing office locations (PINS) © Lloyd’s not legal entity count, May 2021 **Gross Signed Premiums sourced by Xchanging and LDR ǂ PINs (Office locations), May 2021 © Lloyd’s 14 Classification: Confidential
Coverholders are key distribution partners at Lloyd's Coverholders write mainly insurance business, with c.70% of policyholders being based in North America. Business grew steadily from 2015-2019 but reduced in 2020 due to performance management. DA business is 73% Coverholders Overall DA business grew c.$4.5bn from 2015 to 2019, Policyholders in the Americas and 88% insurance but fell by c.US$1.5 bn in 2020 account for c.70% of DA business Lloyd’s DA premium trend Lloyd’s DA business by Service location of policyholder Coverholder Compani… 7.3% CAGR 2015-2019 EMEA 73% 19% -8.4% Americas US$17 bn 20,000 2019-20 69% 2020 18,168 18,255 Unmatche 16,202 16,717 d Binder* US$17 bn APAC 16,000 14,774 2020 4% 13,752 12% GSP (USD mn) 12,000 Facultative Insurance… 7% 8,000 Location of policyholder: 5 year CAGR US$17 bn Americas 7% 2020 Non- 4,000 Proportiona… EMEA -4% 0 APAC 4% Proportional Treaty… 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 © Lloyd’s Source: Gross Signed Premiums (GSP) sourced by Xchanging and LDR; by calendar year, based on the location of the policyholder. *Data Health Warning: Not all delegated authority premium is processed via Xchanging and LDR (approx. 80-90% is) or can successfully be matched due to deficiencies in data entered manually. Those are indicated as Unmatched Binder; Parts of Lloyd’s Asia DA business is not processed via Xchanging or LDR. 15 Classification: Confidential
A single, seamless Delegated Authority ecosystem 7. Delegated Audit Manager (AiMS) 1. Delegated Oversight Manager (replacing ATLAS) Scheduling, scoping & follow-up for Coverholder & DCA Smarter approval & data-based oversight of Coverholders & DCAs audits. Will introduce risk-based optimization of audits & provide insights on performance to market. 6. Future at Lloyd’s Middle & Back-office 7 1 2. Delegated Contract Manager (replacing BAR) Vision to streamline accounting & settlement processes Consistent, transparent data-based registration of – enabling reduced complexity, errors & delays contracts & optional construction of right-first-time 6 2 contracts 5 3 4 5. Delegated Data Manager (DA SATS) 3. Lloyd’s Coverholder Workbench (optional) Will act as a centralised Coverholder reporting data store, reducing burden of regulatory reporting (when fully adopted) Integrates quoting, binding, document generation, billing & production of fully compliant data NEW DA system Existing system 4. Future at Lloyd’s Claims Vision includes automated straight- through claims processing © Lloyd’s 16 Classification: Confidential
Syndicate Oversight Lifecycle This view shows the end to end view of how oversight is applied to a syndicate from cradle to entry point to exit Key Interventions Impose Approve / Impose a Impose Approve / Remove conditions on Approve / reject a new capital operational reject a permission to syndicate appointment reject a RI loading risk loading business underwrite application of Board contract plan member Year 3 Years 1-3: onwards: high touch Monitoring & Market based on Communications Scan reporting Planning risk profile Enter the Synd. Plan Exit the Decisions Planning Annual Assessment Market* Market* Approval Oversight Assessment Cycle Closure Specific Performance Communication Process Reviews Monitoring * Note Entering and exiting the Market are not annual processes, they are exceptional New Synd Market Syndicate Performance Specific Decisions Comms Closure Assessment Planning Plan Approval Monitoring Reviews New entrants Decisions to MAs Synd run-off Combined Ratio Oversight Plans Market Messaging SBF Submission Thematic Review Business plan Synd retirement High-Level Pitch Pricing MA Letter Mkt Oversight Plan LCR Submission Min Standard Rev Capital plan Forced closure Prelim Approval Written premiums Additional Oversight Thematic review MA Letters CPG Process Change of control RITC Making It Happen Paid claims Change of Control reports MA Engagement MA Comms Authority to Approval Claim reserves Survey Results Reg Reporting MA Negotiation Reg Updates Regulatory Reviews underwrite Communication Model changes Rating Agency © Lloyd’s 17 Classification: Confidential
Key Decision Processes The following slides define the key oversight decision making processes with their high-level inputs, key stages, approvals and outputs. In summary, those key decision-making processes are Enter the Annual Exit the Market Oversight Market Cycle New Entrants Business & Capital Change of Market Oversight Exit the Market Approval Plan Approval Control Approval Planning The process to manage The process to receive The process to receive, the exit and/or run-off of The process to receive, The process to plan and review applications review and approve syndicates and review and approve any appropriate, for new entrants into annual syndicate managing agents from changes in control of proportionate oversight Lloyd's from initial pitch business plans and the Lloyd’s market in a syndicates, MAs, which is suitable to the to full approval, capital requirements, controlled, managed members agents and current risk environment confirming that they ensuring they align to way to mitigate any risk their parent and in accordance with support the Lloyd’s Market Messages and to policyholders, organisations, e.g. Lloyd's risk appetite and brand and meet Lloyd’s strategy. investors or the Central following a merger regulatory requirements. Minimum Standards Fund © Lloyd’s 18 Classification: Confidential
Three key interlinking elements of the Oversight Framework have been developed in parallel Clear syndicate categories driven by Lloyd’s view of performance against Principles and a syndicate’s materiality Syndicate categorisation High-level principles, across 13 dimensions, Oversight Growth and development supported by guidance, that allows Lloyd’s to Oversight and Development Principles opportunities for the best run differentiate from non-compliance through to best interventions opportunities businesses practice An escalating scale of interventions that are linked to principles and overall syndicates categorisation © Lloyd’s 19 Classification: Confidential
Oversight Principles: A clear overarching principle is set for each oversight area, supported by a small number of underlying statements The 13 Principles set out the fundamental responsibilities expected of all Managing Agents in order to support the Markets’ overall performance, capital strength, financial and reputational credibility Dimension Overarching Principle Dimension Overarching Principle Underwriting Managing agents should produce and execute syndicate business plans which Capital Managing agents should ensure syndicates Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) Profitability are logical, realistic and achievable and ensure long term sustainability including appropriately reflects their risk profile and is calculated using a SII compliant internal expense management S model. O Catastrophe Managing agents should ensure syndicates maintain appropriate control of Investment Managing agents should ensure syndicate investment risk taking is effectively L Exposure Catastrophe risk (natural and non-natural) in line with agreed risk appetites controlled, informed by wider business strategy and adheres to the Prudent Person V Principle (PPP) requirements. E N Outwards Managing agents should define and execute syndicate outwards reinsurance Liquidity Managing agents should ensure syndicates (and their members) they have contractual C Reinsurance strategy and purchasing plan which reflects the wider business strategy access to sufficient liquidity in order to withstand a severe liquidity event (defined by P Y Lloyd’s), underpinned by a robust liquidity risk management framework. E R F O Claims Managing agents should deliver a high quality claims service supported by Governance and Managing agents should have governance structures and internal risk management R Management efficient and effective claims management solutions and underpinned by a clear Reporting (Subject to and control frameworks in place which enable well-informed, timely and effective A claims commitment which ensures fair and timely claims handling and good ELG review) decision making and consistently accurate and timely reporting to Lloyd’s. N customer outcomes. O C P E E Regulatory, Managing agents should have robust regulatory and financial crime frameworks in R Compliance place to meet and adapt to relevant legislation and guidance. Frameworks should Customer Managing agents should embed a culture and associated behaviours A and Financial Crime support well informed, transparent relationships with Lloyd’s and regulators. Outcomes throughout their organisation to ensure they consistently focus on good TI customer outcomes O N Operational Managing agents should maintain robust and resilient operations, embedding cyber A resilience resilience and effective third-party risk management. L Reserving Managing agents should ensure syndicates set reserves which are underpinned Culture Managing agents should be inclusive and representative, creating a high performance by a robust reserving process. All Actuarial Function requirements should be culture. met in line with Solvency II. © Lloyd’s 20 Classification: Confidential
QUESTIONS
Thank you for participating! A recording of this webinar will be made available at www.wsia.org. WSIA’s U40 2021 Webinar Series July 12, 2021
You can also read