LIVING WITH COVID19 SECOND REVIEW - Tuesday 16th March 2021 - NIHR Evidence
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
LIVING WITH COVID19 SECOND REVIEW Tuesday 16th March 2021 DOI: 10.3310/themedreview_45225 A dynamic review of the evidence around on ongoing Covid19 Ongoing Covid19 (often called Long Covid)
This is the second of two dynamic reviews of the evidence around people’s experience of the enduring symptoms following a Covid19 infection. 1 Living with COVID19
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We published our first review of the evidence in October 2020. At the time there was uncertainty about the extent to which there could be lasting effects, and most people assumed a linear progression of a severe acute infection with a long recovery tail. Our first review on “Living with Covid19” was informed by the experience of professionals and we worked closely with a group of people with lived experience. In this review, we focus on the published evidence. In addition, we report findings from a short survey of people living with Covid19 that we embedded on our website. With over 3,000 responses it provided us with an insight into the key issues and challenges for people living with Covid19. Since October, the term ‘Long one month later and at least 10% to hospital and those who stayed Covid’ has gained widespread use three months later. For those at home. The limited evidence of and we have adopted it. But we who were admitted to hospital, correlation between past history recognise it covers a wide range of between 50% and 89% have at and current pathology would symptoms, including a high number least one enduring symptom after suggest a need to investigate of post-viral fatigue cases that two months. Our own and Davis anyone with persistent symptoms, appear to resolve spontaneously et al. (2020) preprint surveys including those who were never by 8 to 12 weeks. suggest significant rates of Long admitted to hospital. Covid beyond six months for There is enormous variation people who were not hospitalised. There is also evidence of a group of in the estimated prevalence Any estimates of incidence and people with cognitive processing of Long Covid due to different prevalence must be considered disorders and anxiety with some measurement criteria, making provisional. The ONS reported indication of neurological rather comparing studies impossible. an incidence in December 2020 than social cause. A substantial Many people were unable to of 301,000 people in the UK with number of people have symptoms access Covid19 testing when symptoms lasting between 5 and they are not yet understood. first ill and are excluded from 12 weeks. Long Covid appears to Some are similar to Myalgic some studies as the infection is be more frequent in women and in Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue not confirmed. This may mask young people (including children) Syndrome (ME/CFS) and others to the true prevalence of Long than might have been expected orthostatic intolerance syndromes. Covid. Uncertainty about a prior from acute Covid19 mortality. There is some evidence suggesting infection means some people Long Covid is a still active disease, report difficulty accessing services Whilst there is a growing list with immunological evidence for their Long Covid symptoms. It of symptoms associated with of continued inflammatory appears that at least 10% of those Long Covid, we know little about responses, lingering viral activity infected with Covid19 experience different clusters and patterns of and/or blood clotting disorders. at least one symptom for 12 symptoms (sometimes described For some people with Long Covid, weeks or longer. For those who as phenotypes, syndromes or there appears to be the potential were not admitted to hospital, at clusters). There is increasing for further deterioration. least 20-30% experience at least evidence of organ impairment in one enduring symptom around both people who were admitted Living with COVID19 2
Long Covid can be very debilitating ongoing monitoring in secondary existing health conditions) who and some people need help care. This will require joined- may not have been captured in with personal care months after up care management across research to date and who may be the initial infection. 71% of specialities and between primary tipped into a state of frailty. respondents in our own survey and secondary care. New service said Long Covid was affecting delivery models that provide rapid We conclude that the journey of family life and 39% said it was access to an increasing number of Long Covid is not well understood impacting their ability to care people with Long Covid need to be and it is important to continue to for dependents. This is having an designed and evaluated. This will listen to the lived experience as impact on the workforce, with 80% also require a multiprofessional we move into the second year of of respondents in our own survey workforce strategy. this new disease. As we learn more saying Long Covid had affected about the progression of Long their ability to work and 36% said As well as clinical rehabilitation Covid, it is important to retain a it was affecting their finance. care, some people need ongoing wide range of working hypotheses. social care. Particular attention We make the following Long Covid can be a multi-system should be paid to the impact of recommendations for the future disease, and some people may Long Covid on vulnerable people, research agenda. have active disease that needs (such as older people with pre- • More research is needed on • We recommend that a rapid evaluation of different the incidence of Long Covid minimum data set for service models and skill mix for and its causes. This will help recording a wide range of supporting people with Long to predict and prevent Long symptoms be agreed and Covid. Covid in the longer term. used by both researchers and • Seldom heard voices are There is an urgent need to healthcare providers. not visible in the current research treatments and • Some elements of Long evidence. We recommend management for people with Covid are similar to other research that is targeted at Long Covid. conditions and evaluations of vulnerable people (including • The emergent nature of the interventions (pharmaceutical, older people and people understanding of Long Covid psychological and physical with learning disabilities) as emphasises the need to therapies) are needed that well as hard-to-reach groups continue to explore a range may improve symptoms. including travellers and prison of hypotheses in any research For non-pharmaceutical populations. that is undertaken. interventions, a range of • We recommend that people research methodologies • A precursor to research in all living with Long Covid (who should be encouraged. areas is a better understanding are experts by experience) of the disease syndromes • Long Covid is a significant should be equal partners and symptom clusters that health burden that is unlikely in setting the research currently sit under the to be met by existing NHS agenda. umbrella of Long Covid or services and new delivery post Covid. models that allow rapid access are needed. We recommend 3 Living with COVID19
NIHR Centre for Engagement and Dissemination The National Institute for Health of all the evidence nor are they into account the UK infrastructure Research (NIHR) Centre for guidance or recommendations and culture, often funded by the Engagement and Dissemination for practice. Instead they are NIHR. Themed reviews include (NIHR CED) aims to engage people narratives based on a selection both academic study and practical in knowledge exchange to develop of different kinds of evidence wisdom from lived experience and and improve health and social chosen to illuminate and inform are guided by our stakeholders. care. One of the ways we do this discussions focused on actions for is through our Themed Reviews. practice. As far as possible, they These are not systematic reviews highlight UK evidence that takes What are we aiming to achieve with our Living with Covid19 reviews? Our first review on “Living with may be particularly helpful for and the Scottish Intercollegiate Covid19” was informed by the professionals who are increasingly Guidelines Network (SIGN) to lived experience of patients and coming into contact with people develop guidelines on the long- professionals and we worked with Long Covid, but not running term effects of Covid19. Working closely with a group of people with specialist services themselves. with the Royal College of General lived experience. In this review, we It may also be helpful for the Practitioners, the first of their turn our attention to the published families or employers of people ‘living’ guidelines was published evidence. In addition, we report experiencing Long Covid as well on 18th December 2020. In findings from a short survey for as people living with enduring November 2020, the NIHR, people living with Covid19 that symptoms. together with United Kingdom we embedded on our website. Research and Innovation (UKRI) As with many surveys, it was a Since October, there has been issued a call for research into the self-selected sample that may not widespread acceptance that long- longer-term effects of Covid19 be representative of all people term symptoms exist and there in non-hospitalised individuals. living with enduring symptoms. is increasing activity to refine Successful bids were announced But, with 3,286 full responses it measurement. NHS England and on 18th February 2021. provides valuable insight into key the Scottish Government asked issues and challenges for people the National Institute for Health living with Covid19. This review and Care Excellence (NICE) 5 Living with COVID19
More papers have been published since our last review, Framing the but the evidence still resembles a ‘Swiss cheese’ with evidence many gaps. Inconsistencies in findings reflect different assumptions in the research design. In this review, we try to make sense of the disparate body of literature and clarify what is known, what needs further research, and most importantly, what we know about treating Long Covid. This report is not a systematic narrative. We intend to outline a that many papers describe data review of all published evidence. coherent picture from some of the collected at an early stage of the We have not formally assessed the jigsaw pieces of evidence, and we pandemic and therefore cannot quality of the included evidence. make no claims of completeness. include detailed information about We searched academic databases the current duration of symptoms. and sought recommendations In our first review, we opted to This also means that we do not from a network of people looking exclude preprints because they know the impact of new variants at Long Covid. We identified had not yet been peer-reviewed. or vaccinations on rates of Long 302 publications, some of which We still read them with caution, Covid (however defined). Whilst were opinion pieces or personal however they identify themes that we do not think the evidence can stories. We narrowed this down are relevant to policy, practice be synthesised, it can be used to to research papers that addressed and future research questions, build a three dimensional picture three themes: how common is Long so we discuss their findings of Long Covid and to illuminate Covid? What causes Long Covid? as propositions rather than as what further questions need and how might Long Covid be assured evidence. Where we to be asked. Summaries of treated? The team decided which reference them, we identify that included studies can be found papers to include in this review they are preprints. The nature in Appendix A. based on how they added to the of research reporting means Living with COVID19 6
What is ‘Long Covid’? One of the features of Long Covid is the wide range of symptoms. Davis et al. (2020) preprint lists 205 different symptoms related to 10 different systems. For some people, it has a relapsing nature, often referred to as the ‘corona coaster’, and for others, there is a single symptom but with a typical progress. This has significant implications for the management of the disease. More than one syndrome Our first review was mindfully called ‘Living with Covid19’ to capture a range of symptoms that persist following a Covid19 infection. We noted that people may experience different clusters of symptoms or syndromes (see Figure 1). We proposed that some people suffered permanent organ damage and there may also be a number of distinct syndromes, including post intensive care Figure 1: Measurement of symptoms, clusters or individual conditions syndrome, post viral fatigue syndrome and long-term Covid syndrome. We also observed that future research should consider traumatic stress disorder”. some people may be suffering with subtypes of Long Covid. Cirulli et more than one syndrome at the al. (2020) preprint report of a large Sudre et al. (2020) preprint same time. cohort study in the USA describes reported two different patterns of diverse phenotypic presentations. symptomatology for Long Covid Since then, others have been from the Zoe Covid Symptoms reaching similar conclusions about Some authors have attempted to Study App; firstly, people reporting distinct patterns. Ayoubkhani et classify the different syndromes. exclusively fatigue, headache and al. (2021) preprint reporting on Venturelli et al. (2021) followed up upper respiratory complaints the Office for National Statistics patients discharged from hospital (shortness of breath, sore throat, (ONS) work notes that Long Covid, in Italy and noted three different persistent cough and loss of smell) or post-Covid syndrome, is not a syndromes “it appears reasonable and secondly those with additional single condition and Yong (2020) to try and separate those symptoms multi-system complaints, preprint noted multiple different related to post-viral chronic fatigue including ongoing fever and symptoms and potential disease syndrome, from those due to post- gastroenterological symptoms. mechanisms and recommends that critical-illness syndrome, or post- 7 Living with COVID19
Amenta et al. (2020) propose confirm the undulating nature of noted that the ‘biphasic’ disease three classifications: 1) residual Long Covid symptoms described pathway description of ‘acute symptoms that persist after in our first review with 64% of illness’ and ‘post-acute illness’ did recovery from acute infection; (2) respondents reporting a period of not match the lived experience organ dysfunction that persists wellness before relapsing. reports of multiple and diverse after initial recovery; and (3) new ongoing symptoms. Some patient symptoms or syndromes that advocates are unhappy with the Use of time frames to develop after initial asymptomatic term ‘post Covid’ as it suggests segment the patient or mild infection. The Cochrane there is no active disease process. population Rehabilitation 2020 rapid living They point to both the evidence systematic review (Ceravolo et Some have categorised ongoing on continuing viral presence and al. 2020) used four categories symptoms by duration, noting the presentation of new symptoms that might relate to Long Covid: significant resolution rates at after 12 weeks (see section on 1) symptoms continuing from the 5 weeks and again at 12 weeks. what causes Long Covid). NICE’s acute phase of Covid19 and its The NICE guideline published in rationale for describing ‘post’ treatment; 2) symptoms causing December 2020, together with Covid19 syndrome was that it a new health condition; 3) late SNOMED codes for medical reflected that the acute phase of onset symptoms appearing as records released in the same illness had ended and they did not a consequence of Covid19 but month, divide symptoms into intend for it to indicate that the after the end of the acute phase; three time periods; acute Covid19 person had recovered. 4) impact on a pre-existing health up to four weeks; ongoing condition or disability. symptomatic Covid19 from 4 to 12 weeks; and post-Covid19 syndrome developing during or Undulating symptoms after an infection consistent with and relapses Covid19 and continuing for more KEY POINTS than 12 weeks and not explained Researchers have categorised Salmon-Ceron et al. (2020) found by an alternative diagnosis. The ongoing symptoms following a that 43% of people followed NICE categories do not relate to Covid19 infection both by their up after discharge from a Paris particular symptoms or groups of duration and by the number of hospital had a symptom-free symptoms. symptoms. The difference in their interval before relapsing. They also report that 76% presented new findings raises a question about symptoms that were absent during Lived experience whether different people need the acute phase of their Covid19 perspectives different treatment and support. infection. Davis et al (2020) Callard and Perego (2020) Indeed the duration of symptoms preprint paper of an international described how patient advocates may correlate with different web-based survey, led by people rather than researchers created syndromes or phenotypes and with Long Covid, reported 86% the narrative and the name Long may be related to different causal of respondents experienced Covid after connecting on social mechanisms. relapses occurring in an irregular media and making visible the pattern, or in response to specific persistent nature of a wide range triggers (such as physical or mental of symptoms when attention activity, stress, menstruation, heat, was primarily focused on acute or alcohol). Our survey findings illness and mortality. They Living with COVID19 8
How many people who have had Covid19 will experience ongoing symptoms? Why is this important? Methodological challenges For many studies, a positive antigen, polymerase chain reaction Understanding how many The lack of a consistent definition (PCR) or antibody test is required people experience Long Covid is of Long Covid makes assimilating to exclude people with symptoms important for a number of reasons. findings from different studies not associated with a Covid19 Firstly, the need to plan adequate difficult. As Figure 2 demonstrates, infection. However, community services (including assessment, studies have focused on different testing was suspended in the diagnosis, treatment and people, symptoms and time UK in March 2020 and 82% of supportive care) and the workforce intervals, and used different respondents to our survey said to deliver them. Secondly, knowing sample sizes. The early lack community testing was not how many people have ongoing of awareness of the range of available at the time of their initial problems informs decisions about symptoms associated with infection. This lack of testing funding for further research. Covid19 meant that many people was also noted by Varsavsky et Thirdly it helps to calculate the did not associated their symptoms al. (2021), who reported that potential impact on society in with Covid19 and therefore did not only 40% of those who reported the future, including the impact associate their enduring symptoms classic symptoms on the Zoe on those of working age and by with Long Covid. Conversely, the Covid Symptom Study App had extension the economy. Finally range of Long Covid symptoms is gone on to receive a test. In our there may be a new generation of not widely known and people may survey, 56% of respondents had carers for those with Long Covid not associate them with a prior either had an antigen test or an who have their own needs. Covid19 infection. antibody test at a later date. Of those tested, 46% tested negative, despite having had symptoms consistent with the virus. 67% of respondents were told by a health professional that their symptoms might be due to Long Covid. Barker Davies (personal communication), reporting on the UK Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre video assessment service, found that service personnel who had not been admitted to hospital were 75% less likely to have had a test confirmation than those who were admitted to hospital. Figure 2 9 Living with COVID19
They also found that those had may have been skewed. infection. For example, Cirulli et received a test confirmation of Most studies report the frequency al. (2020) preprint of a large public Covid19 had their assessment of at least one symptom, not health study in the USA showed earlier than those who without necessarily the same symptom, that whilst people both with a confirmation (8.5 weeks v rather than a cluster of symptoms. and without a history Covid19 16 weeks). The inability of a Many of the symptoms reported reported persistent new symptoms significant number of people occur in a range of diagnoses, and over three months, those who reporting Long Covid symptoms to a few studies have used controls tested positive for a Covid19 confirm an initial infection means to see if enduring symptoms are reported them twice as often. sampling in some of the studies more common after a Covid19 Study No of participants in study Study No of participants in study 47,780 Covid19+ hospital Halpin et al. 100 Ayoubkani et al. (ONS) discharges (matched to controls) Puntmann et al 100 9,063 Covid19+ with LC Tabacof et al. 84 ONS January symptoms (from CIS Salmon-Ceron et al. 70 2021 update survey of 150,000) Raman et al. 58 Sudre et al. (Zoe App) 4,182 Vlachou et al 39 Davis et al. 3,762 Guedj et al. 35 NIHR CED survey 3,286 Doykov et al. 20 Munblit et al. 2,649 Yeoh et al. 27 Vaes et al. 1,837 Humphreys et al. 18 Huang et al. 1733 Kommoss et al. 13 Venturelli et al. 767 Dani et al. 6 357 Covid19+ ( 24,592 Ciculli et al. non-matched controls) Ludvigsson et al. 5 Xiong et al. 538 Mandal et al. 384 Box 1 : Primary research studies (N.B. different research 361 Covid+ (83,924 questions and designs means size of sample is not necessarily Hampshire et al. an indicator of relative quality) non-matched controls) Tenforde et al. 292 Moreno-Perez et al. 277 Bergamaschi et al. 207 Dennis et al. 201 Logue et al. 177 Barker Davies et al. 155 Carfi et al. 143 Landi et al 131 Buonsenso et al 129 Townsend et al. 128 D’Cruz et al. 119 Arnold et al. 110 Tomasoni et al. 105 Living with COVID19 10
Range of prevalence compared. The NICE guideline samples chosen to represent estimates (2020) evidence reviews 2 and everyone in the population and 3 noted the range of symptoms those where people self-select). Measurement is reported as either reported across studies was very prevalence (proportion of a known broad and that all the studies Estimates of the proportion of population at a specified point in reviewed were at high or moderate people who experience Long time) or incidence (rate of new risk of bias. Covid post-hospital discharge are cases within a defined period of more robust than for people who time). The prevalence estimates Seldom heard groups such as were not hospitalised. Studies within the UK and internationally travellers, prison populations, published to date show that a (see Figure 3) vary widely, even frail elderly people, care home higher proportion people who had when measuring the same time residents, those with learning been admitted to hospital go on to frame. Estimates of people with disabilities and children are experience Long Covid, although symptoms that have not resolved not well represented in the this may reflect definitions of Long by eight weeks range from 4.5% data. Published studies may Covid that relate to a particular of people completing the Zoe therefore not be representative of set of symptoms more common in Covid Symptom App (Sudre everybody who has Long Covid. those who were hospitalised (see et al. 2020 preprint) to 89% of section on what is Long Covid). people who received a minimum Studies also differ in the way they We also note that criteria for of oxygen therapy in hospital for collect data. Some follow up a being admitted to hospital vary more than 48 hours (D’Cruz et cohort of people (a fixed group of across countries. Even in the UK, al. 2020). However, the studies people studied over time), others reports do not always differentiate used different case definition use cross-sectional surveys (a between the different levels of and different inclusion criteria sample of people studied at a point care (those who received standard and therefore cannot be directly in time, and these differ between oxygen therapy, high flow oxygen or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure therapy [CPAP] and those who were mechanically ventilated). Symptom reporting up to four weeks Early studies looked at short term effects. For example, Tenforde et al. (2020) conducted a multistate telephone survey in the USA of 292 adults who had a positive test result for Covid19 but were not admitted to hospital, finding 35% had not returned to their usual state of health two to three weeks after testing. This included 20% of 18–34 years with no pre- existing conditions. Figure 3: Range of prevalence estimates by duration 11 Living with COVID19
Symptom reporting people eight weeks after discharge Moreno-Perez et al. (2021) from 5 to 12 weeks from a UK hospital and found only prospective cohort study of adult 11% had no lasting symptoms; patients in Spain presenting The ONS (January 2021) 39% were more breathless and/ at an emergency department estimated that 20% of all people or had a persistent cough; 57% with varying severity of disease in the UK who had tested positive reported sleep disturbance; and reported that 50% had a post- for Covid19 exhibit symptoms 25% demonstrated post-traumatic acute Covid19 syndrome (Long for five weeks or longer and 10% stress disorder. Halpin et al. (2021) Covid) 10 to 14 weeks after the exhibit symptoms for 12 weeks or followed up people from another infection. Cirulli et al. (2020) longer. They reported an incidence UK hospital on average six weeks preprint paper reports an online of 301,000 people with symptoms after discharge and reported that survey of 21,359 people self- lasting between 5 and 12 weeks 72% of post ICU patients and 60% selected from existing cohort for the week commencing 27th of those treated on the wards health studies in the USA to December 2020. reported new illness-related control for Covid19. Respondents fatigue. Both groups reported were categorised into three groups These are provisional estimates breathlessness and psychological for comparison; those who tested that may be revised as the follow- distress. 69% of ICU patients and positive for Covid19, those who up data mature and the study 46% of ward patients reported tested negative for Covid19 and methodology is developed. The lower health-related quality of life those not tested at all. All were ONS survey collects data from a scores. These UK studies mirror asked about new symptoms (due to random, representative sample international findings. Xiong et any illness) that had lasted longer of the community population in al. (2020) reported that 50% of than 30 days. 15% of those who the UK through the Coronavirus patients discharged from a hospital had tested positive for Covid19 Infection Survey (CIS). Everyone in Wuhan reported one or more were still experiencing symptoms in the sample is swabbed at every persistent symptoms three months lasting three months or more, follow-up visit, irrespective of later. Carfì et al. (2020) found that compared to 8% of those who had symptoms or recent contacts. 87% of patients discharged from never been tested. Thus there is no dependence on a Rome hospital after a Covid19 the broader community testing infection were still experiencing The lowest estimate of enduring paradigm of the day. ONS have at least one symptom two months symptoms came from Sudre et al. added a new question to the after the onset on Covid19 and (2020) in their October preprint CIS survey in 2021 allowing 40% said that the quality of their reporting on 4,182 self-selected respondents to state the impact life had been reduced. Tomasoni people who entered data on the Long Covid has had on their day- et al. (2021) found that 52% of Zoe Covid Symptom Study App and to-day activities, and including patients discharged in Milan had tested positive for Covid19. an expanded list of symptoms. reported persistent physical They found 4.5% reported having Recognising that some people with symptoms between one and three symptoms lasting more than eight symptoms may test negative this months after they had recovered weeks and 2.3% having symptoms question will not be dependent on from a Covid19 infection and 17% for longer than 12 weeks. a positive test finding. reported persistent cognitive disorders. Mini–Mental State People admitted to hospital have examination of 25 of the patients been followed-up more often demonstrated scores that were than those who stayed at home. compatible with cognitive D’Cruz et al. (2020) followed up impairment in 40%. Living with COVID19 12
Symptom reporting at Munblit et al. 2021) including our people responding were aged 30- six months own, where 81% of respondents 59. were female, and we discuss Huang et al. (2021) reported possible biological sex differences There is growing evidence of Long on the follow up of patients in the section on what causes Long Covid in children. Buonsenso et discharged from a hospital in Covid. However, most research al. (2021) preprint followed up Wuhan following a diagnosis of findings do not then report in children who presented to an Covid19. 76% of patients reported detail whether the experience of Italian hospital with Covid19, at least one symptom six months Long Covid differs by sex. There excluding those with severe after the infection onset, with is little discussion about ethnicity disabilities. 53% had at least incidence higher in women. Logue in Long Covid, although this may one persisting symptom four et al. (2021) surveyed people be a sampling issue. Cirulli et months after diagnosis and 43% with confirmed Covid19 infection al. (2020) preprint reports an reported that it affected their in the USA, 85% of whom had investigation using a pre-existing daily activities. They note that not been hospitalised. 33% of public health cohort study in the three children developed multi- non-hospitalised and 31% of USA that matched people who system inflammatory syndrome; hospitalised patients reported at reported a Covid19 infection this syndrome in children with least one persistent symptom six with controls (people already in Covid19 is also noted by Ahmed months after diagnosis. Munblit the cohort study but who had not et al. (2020) systematic review. et al. (2021) preprint follow up of had a Covid19 infection). They Ludvigsson et al. (2020) case patients discharged from a Russian found no differences between report described five children with hospital found that 47% reported ethnicities in overall rates of long- symptoms lasting for six to eight one persistent symptom six to term symptoms, although they months after a clinical diagnosis of eight months later and 11% had acknowledged that the sample Covid19. None were hospitalised multi-system symptoms. size of non-white ethnicities was and although improving, none had limited. returned to school. The Office Demographics for National Statistics (ONS), in The profile of people with Long Long Covid appears to be more their January 2021 update based Covid does not seem to match common in younger people on their CIS household survey, those hospitalised with Covid19 than would be anticipated from estimated that 12.9% of 2-11 year or those who die from it. Most the rates of hospitalisation for olds and 14.5% of 12-16 year olds surveys indicate that Long Covid Covid19. 67% of respondents in the UK were still experiencing is more commonly reported by to our own survey were aged one of the symptoms in the survey women (Yong. 2020; ONS 2020; between 25 and 54 and Davis et five weeks after testing positive Sudre et al. 2020 Davis et al. 2020; al (2020) preprint report 87% of for Covid19. KEY POINTS prevalence at six months. Our own and Davis et al. (2020) preprint surveys suggest significant rates of Prevalence estimates cluster into broad groupings, Long Covid beyond six months for people who were although caveats around bias and representation not hospitalised. Any estimates of incidence and mean they should be treated with caution. For those prevalence must be considered provisional. who were not admitted to hospital, it appears that at least 20-30% experience at least one enduring Long Covid appears to be more frequent in women symptom around one month later and at least 10% and in young people (including children) than might three months later. For those who were admitted have been expected from acute Covid19 mortality. to hospital, between 50% and 89% have at least There is little data about ethnicity and the incidence one enduring symptom after two months and of Long Covid in these groups is unclear. more recent studies suggest there is still a high 13 Living with COVID19
The causes of Long Covid This section looks at the evidence about what causes Long Covid and its impact physically, psychologically and socially. Understanding the cause of Long Covid would help design treatments and to prevent it. Much of the evidence is speculative, based on the symptoms people with Long Covid display or generalising from conditions with similar symptoms. It is unclear whether the same pathology seen in the acute phase of Covid19 also leads to Long Covid. As Yong’s (2020) preprint observes, one puzzling feature of Long Covid is that its development is not predicted by initial Covid19 severity. We do not know whether symptom Immunology changes and persistent cell patterns reflect already known defects may contribute to Long The fact that so many physiological syndromes or a unique new Covid. Doykov et al. (2020) systems are involved in Long disease of Long Covid. Salmon- analysed blood samples from Covid led the British Society for Ceron et al. (2020) raised several healthcare workers who had Immunology (2020) to suggest that theories about the cause of Long tested positive for Covid19 who damage caused by the immune Covid: continuing presence of were asymptomatic or who had a system’s response, rather than the virus, reinfection (the same mild acute infection and compared the virus itself, may be causing or possibly a different strain), their mass-spectrometry-based the symptoms. Barker Davies dysfunctional immune response assay profiles with those of a et al (2020) noted inflammatory leading to an inflammatory chronic similar control group who had changes seen in Covid19 can result condition, or a condition similar tested negative. All who had tested in inflammation of blood vessels, to ME/CFS. They observed that positive, both asymptomatic and myocarditis (inflammation of the post-traumatic stress could not be moderately symptomatic, retained heart muscle) and arrhythmias dismissed as a factor. a significant inflammatory (heart beat irregularities) which response two months later with may explain some of the symptoms Post Viral Fatigue raised biomarkers, especially and diagnostic findings in Long those related to anti-inflammatory The most commonly reported Covid. This is borne out in Raman responses and mitochondrial (the enduring symptom following the et al. (2020) paper that found part of cells that produce energy) onset or Covid19 is fatigue. This damage visible on MRI scans stress. is a well-established symptom beyond just the lungs and reduced following viral infections and exercise tolerance correlated with Salmon-Ceron et al. (2020) suggest was noted after the Spanish Flu serum markers of inflammation. Covid19 may lead to autoimmune pandemic and the more recent The British Society for conditions in genetically SARS, MARS and Ebola epidemics. Immunology suggest that predisposed individuals. The Fatigue is also observed after inflammatory responses may British Society for Immunology some bacterial infections. Lam et worsen pre-existing conditions, but (2020) observed that other viral al (2009) report a follow-up study equally may cause new ones. They infections can trigger a range of of 233 patients with Severe Acute also note that inflammation can autoimmune diseases such as Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in lead to thrombotic complications. Guillain Barré syndrome. Hong Kong which showed that Bergamaschi et al. (2020) preprint 40% met the criteria for Chronic demonstrated that people Fatigue Syndrome at four months needing hospital admission had and 27% for longer than six delayed immune responses and months. conclude that late inflammatory Living with COVID19 14
Yong. (2020) preprint notes that no difference in the prevalence discharge from hospital. Dennis Long Covid can have similar of symptoms between patients et al. (2020) preprint reported on symptoms to conditions such as with a negative test and those people thought to be at low risk lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. who tested positive. Referring to from a Covid19 infection (82% of Dani et al (2020) suggest a number of other publications, whom had not been hospitalised). Long Covid symptoms may be Yong (2020) preprint also reported 66% of those with ongoing explained by ‘immune-mediated that some patients still tested symptoms had some degree of autonomic instability’ and may positive for Covid19 four months impairment in one or more organ result in deconditioning (muscle later. They also noted the virus systems four months after initial weakness), hypovolaemia (low has been detected in faeces for Covid19 symptoms. D’Cruz et level of fluid in the body) or up to two months regardless of al (2020) used computerised neuropathy (dysfunction of one gastrointestinal symptoms. tomography to scan the chests or more nerves). They suggest Yong suggests that in certain of patients with persistent that the symptoms of Long cases, the viral persistence may respiratory symptoms and/or Covid are similar to orthostatic lead to a specific immune response blood oxygen saturation levels intolerance syndromes (inability responsible for Long Covid dropping by more than 4% during a to regulate blood pressure when symptoms. Sit to Stand test two months after changing position) including being hospitalised for a severe hypotension, fainting, tachycardia Yeoh et al (2020) reviewed people Covid19 infection. 66% had some (racing heartbeat), palpitations, who had tested positive for degree of impairment in one or breathlessness and chest pain. Covid19 and collected serial faeces more organ systems. 75% showed This occurs when instead of blood samples up to 30 days after the Covid19 related interstitial lung vessels constricting when a person virus was no longer detected. Gut disease (tissues surrounding the changes position (so blood doesn’t microbiome (the type and range airways) and/or airways disease. pool in the pelvis and legs), blood of microorganisms in the gut) was vessels dilate leading to low blood significantly altered compared Although there is evidence of pressure, dizziness and ultimately with people who had not had organ impairment, it is too early fainting. Covid19 and was associated with to say whether it is reversible. inflammatory markers in the blood; However, organ impairment should Viral persistence they suggest the changes in the be considered when investigating gut may contribute to Long any Long Covid symptoms. Given Salmon-Ceron et al. (2020) Covid symptoms. Long Covid is a multiple system reviewed people who had tested condition, impairment may be seen positive for Covid19 and whose symptoms had either lasted longer Evidence of cardiac and across a multiple organs, all of than two months from initial onset respiratory and other organ which may be related. or had recurred. They found that impairment 25% still had positive PCR nose Puntmann et al. (2020) found 78% Thrombo embolism and throat swabs. They suggest of people who were followed up There has been significant the virus may have continued to around ten weeks after hospital evidence of the impact of blood replicate in the colonised sites, discharge had abnormalities clotting in people hospitalised or had spread to other parts visible on cardiovascular magnetic with Covid19 infections, with the of the body and in some cases, resonance imaging and 60% had introduction of anticoagulants for people had been infected with a ongoing myocardial inflammation. hospital patients being an early different strain of Covid19. Landi Mandal et al (2020) reported that treatment success. There is some et al (2021) used PCR tests with 38% of patients in a Long Covid emerging evidence that thrombo patients discharged from an Italian clinic had chest X-ray findings that embolism is a feature of people hospital deemed to have recovered remained abnormal and 9% had with Long Covid symptoms. from Covid19 and found 17% X- rays showing deterioration tested positive, however there was seven to eight weeks after 15 Living with COVID19
Mandal et al. (2020) found 30% Neurological impact not statistically related to gender of people who had abnormal or age. The British Psychological Wildwing and Holt’s (2021) biomarkers when discharged from Association (2020) guidance on overview of systematic review of hospital had persistently elevated meeting the psychological needs neurological symptoms in Covid19 D–dimer levels (a test used to of people recovering from severe reported two types of neurological help diagnose clotting) and 10% coronavirus (Covid19) suggest a symptoms; life threatening had raised levels of C-reactive range of symptoms may be seen symptoms such as Guillain Barré protein (CRP, which measures and recommends psychological Syndrome and encephalitis, and inflammation) eight weeks later. components of care to aid chronic symptoms such as fatigue Venturelli et al (2021) reported recovery. and myalgia which appear very 17% of patients followed up after similar to other neurological hospital discharge had D-dimer Whilst a number of researchers conditions such as Chronic values twice the threshold for refer to the psychological needs Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and diagnosis of pulmonary embolism of people with Long Covid, this Functional Neurological Disorder three months after they first tested does not mean that there is no (FND). Baig (2020) suggests that positive for Covid19. Kommoss et underlying and/or overlapping Covid19 invokes different immune al. (2020) noted that microvascular physical mechanisms and the responses at different phases of damage may also be a cause of psychological response to critical the disease. They hypothesise persistent lung damage in patients illness is well documented in that vascular events causing with enduring symptoms. Vlachou post- intensive care syndrome. neurological problems are more et al. (2021) found the risk for Saying the cause of symptoms common in the severe acute phase, pulmonary thrombosis remains is not yet understood is not whereas neurological symptoms raised least up to four weeks after synonymous with saying there of Long Covid are a result of discharge from hospital. is no physical cause and the either a low grade ‘smouldering’ uncertainty around different inflammatory response and/or classifications of Long Covid Biological Sex damaged nerve cells. Guedj et al means a physical cause should It has been widely acknowledged (2021) reviewed positron emission be fully investigated. We know that there is a higher prevalence tomography (PET) scans of the from other long-term physical of men requiring critical care brains of people with Long Covid conditions (such as heart failure support and men have higher more than three weeks after their and lung disease) that adjusting mortality rates from Covid19. initial infection and compared to changed health status can lead Takahasksi and Iwasaki (2021) them with healthy matches. They to depression and anxiety. The suggest biological sex differences found biomarkers consistent with National Collaborating Centre for in immunity may contribute to this, memory and cognitive impairment Mental Health (2018) asserted although this has not been tested and autonomic dysfunction that that two-thirds of people with a in practice. Conversely, Karlsson are seen in other diagnoses. long-term condition will also have et al. (2020) note the higher a mental health problem, mostly incidence of Long Covid in females Psychological aspects depression and anxiety disorders. and question whether the different Using a validated hospital anxiety T cell responses between males and depression scale, Tomasoni and females is responsible for Long et al. (2020) found that 30% Covid, through similar mechanisms of people had anxiety and/or to those that are known to depression between one and lead to other autoimmune or three months after clearance inflammatory conditions which are of the Covid19 virus. These higher in females. psychological conditions were Living with COVID19 16
Impact of Long Covid also evident in non-hospitalised One area of note is the impact on cases including those who employment. In our survey, 67% on daily living reported no breathing difficulty. of respondents were aged between As well as clinical needs, the Cognitive difficulties were not 25 and 55 and 81% had been functional impairment seen in explained by differences in age, in paid employment at the time some people with Long Covid may education or other demographic they became ill. 80% said it had result in community and social care and socioeconomic variables. The affected their ability to work with needs. Our survey asked about authors reported that problems 36% saying their symptoms were other social impacts and 71% said demonstrated by those who were affecting their financial status. Long Covid was affecting family not ill enough to be admitted to Similarly, Davis et al. (2020) life and relationships with 39% hospital was unexpected. preprint paper found 45% of those saying it was impacting their ability who did not recover within three to care for their children or other Vaes et al. (2020) asked members month reported needing a reduced dependents. of a Belgian Long Covid Facebook work schedule, and 22% were not group who had not been admitted working six months later. Halpin Cognitive difficulties to hospital to complete the et al. (2021) reported that 15% of and ‘brain fog’ validated Care Dependency working people were off sick when A frequently reported symptom is Scale (CDS). The scale asks 15 followed up four to six weeks after ‘brain fog’. Hampshire et al. (2020) questions about activities of discharge from hospital (rising preprint analysed cognitive test daily living such as personal care, to 38% in those who had an data from 84,285 self-selected household activities, and social and ICU admission). Great British Intelligence Test recreational activities. Only 8% participants. To avoid bias, of respondents reported that promotional material did not they had needed help with mention Covid19. Instead, people personal care before the onset KEY POINTS were told they could undertake a of their Covid19 infection, but Long Covid’s development is free online assessment to identify this increased to 52% 11 weeks not predicted by initial Covid19 their cognitive strengths. After after the infection, with 31% severity. There is no clear evidence the assessment they were asked meeting the threshold for being or clinical consensus about the to complete a questionnaire care-dependent. Venturelli et cause of Long Covid. We do not regarding suspected and confirmed al. (2021) reported that 18% know whether symptom patterns Covid19 infection. People who had of people who recalled having reflect already known syndromes recovered from Covid19 exhibited been totally independent prior or a unique new disease of Long significant cognitive deficits when to infection had some degree of Covid. For some, the physical, compared against controls. This dependency on others (defined psychological and social impact was particularly so for people who by the Barthel Index) three can be severe. had been hospitalised, but was months after hospital discharge. 17 Living with COVID19
In our first review, we reported how Diagnosing people who have enduring symptoms often and predicting did not feel believed. Being able to predict those at higher risk of developing Long Covid the course of would be helpful. We could not find reliable Long Covid evidence for Long Covid risk factors, although we note that the ONS plans to capture data that will help. Investigation and Diagnosis Covid19. Additionally, there (age, sex, comorbidities) nor the was no association between symptoms of the initial disease Dennis et al. (2020) preprint paper routine laboratory markers of predicted the development of on low-risk people who had had inflammation and cell turnover and post-Covid (Long Covid) syndrome. Covid19 (82% of whom had not fatigue after Covid19. The only associations they found been hospitalised) found 66% had were for people with severe some degree of impairment in one D’Cruz et al (2020) concluded pneumonia, in whom higher heart or more organ systems persisting that chest X-rays two months rate and more lung abnormalities for three to four months. However, after discharge are a poor marker on admission to hospital were the damage was more prevalent of disease damage. Only 13% of associated with Long Covid. They in those who had been admitted people in their study had evidence concurred with Amenta et al to hospital. Raman et al. (2021) of Covid19-related lung disease (2020) that Long Covid symptoms studied patients between two on X–ray, but 46% reported higher can be subdivided into residual and three months after discharge breathlessness scores (compared symptoms, organ dysfunction and from hospital and compared with a pre-infection baseline), new inflammatory symptoms, the them to matched controls as and 75% of those who went on implication being that they may part of the PHOSP COVID study. to have CT scans were seen to have different predictors and The Covid19 positive patients have interstitial lung disease and/ require different diagnostic tests. reported higher rates of symptoms or airways disease. Dennis et al. than the controls, and MRI scans (2020) preprint also concluded Barker Davies and colleagues showed abnormalities in their that symptoms and blood tests (personal communication of lungs (60%), heart (26%), liver were not good predictors of organ a forthcoming paper) studied (10%) and kidneys (29%). Whilst damage. Current risk prediction 155 service personnel referred abnormalities were more frequent models may not accurately reflect to the UK Defence Medical in people who had been most long-term morbidity. This may Rehabilitation Centre following severely ill, even patients who explain Arnold et al. (2020) finding a Covid19 infection. They found were not ventilated or did not that although 74% of people no relationships between acute receive vasopressor/ionotropic in their study had persistent symptoms or the location of care support or renal replacement symptoms, notably breathlessness (home/hospital ward/ITU) and the therapy showed evidence of organ and excessive fatigue and limited need for post-Covid (Long Covid) impairment. physical ability, chest X-rays and rehabilitation. Indeed, people with spirometry only showed lung delayed assessment (who were Similarly, Townsend et al (2020) abnormalities in 35%. more likely to have stayed at home found no association between with their initial infection) were Covid19 severity (defined as Risk of deterioration more likely to experience need for inpatient admission, supplemental oxygen or critical Moreno-Perez et al. (2020) found care) and fatigue following that neither baseline features, Living with COVID19 18
shortness of breath, pain and clinical characteristics. This weeks after discharge from anxiety/mood disturbance than showed higher rates of multi- hospital. those with an early referral. organ damage across all ages and The authors recommend prompt ethnicities. People discharged referral for all patients (including from hospital following a Covid19 people who were not hospitalised infection were 3.5 times more KEY POINTS and/or did not have confirmed likely to be readmitted and 7.7 The continuing uncertainty about infections) as there may be times more likely to die within the aetiology of Long Covid potential for deterioration in 140 days than controls. The risks means that it is difficult to predict people finding difficulties accessing of readmission was greater for who will experience severe rehabilitation. people under 70 than those consequences from it. All people over 70 years, and for ethnic reporting enduring symptoms Ayoubkhani et al. (2021) preprint minority groups than for the associated with a confirmed or reported an ongoing ONS study white population. Similarly, suspected Covid19 infection that compared 47,780 individuals Mandal et al (2020) reported should receive a full assessment. discharged from hospital after a that 9% of patients in a Long Covid19 infection with controls Covid clinic had X-rays showing matched for demographic and deterioration seven to eight Management of Long Covid The uncertainties around the causes of Long Covid, have meant that management has focused primarily on ruling out other diagnoses, treating individual symptoms and providing functional rehabilitation. Interventions have drawn on expert consensus and evidence from other conditions. We could not find any interventional studies evaluating the treatment of people with Long Covid. Access to services has been with Long Covid had not sought them develop a management plan. variable. Humphreys et al (2020) any healthcare advice and a 49% said that although they were preprint explored the experience further 32% had not been able to sympathetic, GPs were not able of people living with Long Covid access all of the healthcare they to offer much help. Only 16% had and found some unable to access thought they needed. GP practices accessed a psychologist or mental advice from health professionals were the most frequently accessed health service and only 11% had about managing their conditions. service, with 37% of respondents seen a physiotherapist. In our survey, 15% of respondents saying they listened and helped 19 Living with COVID19
The complexity of needs in some rehabilitation in the form of a new draft guideline on ME/CFS people with Long Covid mirrors breathing exercises reduces for consultation in November the needs of people with multiple breathlessness in chronic 2020, recommending that exercise long-term conditions who obstructive airways disease should be personalised and benefit from a holistic, integrated (Gloeckl et al. 2018; Hsieh et al. overseen by a physiotherapist approach rather than symptom 2018) and Yong (2020) preprint or occupational therapist with by symptom management. Many infers that it should work for specialist training and expertise. people with Long Covid complain respiratory symptoms in Long It recommends that fixed of fragmented care and 23% of our Covid. incremental increases in physical survey respondents wanted a case exercise, for example graded worker/key worker to co-ordinate Physical activity exercise therapy, should not care. Dennis et al. (2020) pre– be used. A key element of rehabilitation print concluded that care should is exercise. Exercise produces be multidisciplinary. 77% of our On the other hand, physical supercompensation to make the survey respondents wanted a one- activity is a well-established body stronger, but individuals stop Covid clinic. rehabilitation intervention have different levels of exercise for people who have become tolerance. Rehabilitation deconditioned, including those exercise therefore needs careful Rehabilitation who have been bed ridden for prescription and monitoring. The Stanford Hall expert some time. Whilst exercise should consensus statement be approached with caution in The use of exercise as a therapy (Barker-Davies et al. 2020) ME/CFS, it may be helpful in other in Long Covid is contested. On provides a framework of likely viral conditions, for example a one hand, many have noted the requirements of multidisciplinary systematic review of exercise similarities between some of rehabilitation for previously and cognitive function in people the symptoms of Long Covid active individuals post Covid19, living with HIV (Quigley et al and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ based on evidence from other 2019) suggested that physical Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/ conditions and professional activity may preserve or improve CFS) which can include exercise expertise. The framework cognition, although none of the intolerance. Studies of SARS provides recommendations for studies were interventional and survivors raised concerns that rehabilitation of pulmonary, further research is needed. exercise intolerance may persist cardiac, musculoskeletal and for months after infection and neurological consequences of Exercise tolerance/intolerance Raman et al (2020) found exercise Covid19. It recommends all should not be seen as binary intolerance correlated with patients requiring rehabilitation concept. A better term might markers of systemic inflammation. following Covid19 have a be “symptom-titrated physical Many of the patients in Raman’s functional assessment and those activity”. Using the term physical study stopped Cardio Pulmonary with post-intensive care syndrome activity instead of exercise therapy Exercise Testing (CPET) early should receive psychological, also highlights the need to think because of generalised muscle physical and cognitive about exercise as part of a person’s ache and fatigue rather than rehabilitation. The Defence day to day life and the need to pace breathlessness. In July 2020 NICE Medical Rehabilitation Centre at all activity. Pacing has parallels made a statement on its website Stanford Hall is currently running a with elite athletes who cannot that it should not be assumed two week residential intervention train to their maximum every that the recommendations on and a concurrent research study to day of the week and need to plan graded exercise therapy in its evaluate the programme. when to fit in the most demanding 2007 guideline on ME/CFS (CG53) session and the lighter activity to apply to people with fatigue There is evidence that pulmonary complement it. following Covid19. NICE issued Living with COVID19 20
You can also read