LIVE WEBINAR Evaporative Emission Regulation & Testing - Patrick Ulmerich - AVL
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
AVL Emission Test Systems LIVE WEBINAR Patrick Ulmerich Evaporative Emission Regulation & Testing Michael Scheytt Public
Daniel Baumann, IT Patrick Ulmerich, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Application Manager Since 1994 working in Emission business Engagement of EVAP Applications started in 1999 Michael Scheytt, Dipl.-Ing. Product Manager Since 1997 working in Emission business Engagement in EVAP Applications started in 2012 emission.marketing@avl.com
Challenges WLTP/1066 RDE § EVAP CO2 Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 3
Emission Legislation Introduction and Overview New Regulations and Requirements Evaporative Emissions System Solutions and Trends Summary Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 4
Legislation: Passenger cars 2018 – 2025 (expected) North America Europe Russia and Eurasia EPA Tier 3 Euro-6d Euro-5 or equivalent C ARB LEV III South Korea EPA Tier-3 / Euro-6 Japan PPNLT China Morocco Algeria Egypt C hina 6b Mexico India EPA Tier 2 / C ARB LEV II Bharat VI Euro-4 or equivalent Nigeria ASEA Brazil Euro-4 or prior or equivalent PROC ONVE L6 Chile EPA Tier 2 / Euro-5 S-Africa Argentina Iraq, Oman Australia Euro-5 or equivalent Africa Saudi Arabia New Zealand Euro-4, prior Euro-4, prior Euro-6 or equivalent or equivalent or equivalent Legend: US based US / UN-EC E UN-ECE based UN-ECE based UN-ECE based Laboratory R e al Driving R DE Monitoring or EVAP le gislation le gislation EU-0 …4 EU-5 … 6c EU-6d te sts Em issions de fe at device chasing Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 5
EVAP TEST SEGMENTATION FACILITY OVERVIEW AND STRUCTURE SHED Soak Area Soak Area SHED 14°C 23°C SHED Gasoline Soak Area Soak Area 38°C 20°C COP Durability DIURNAL ORVR Pre-Con & R&D Stability Testing Facility HOT RUNNING SOAK LOSS Baking 50°C RL-SHED Fuel Station CD SHED Chassis Dyno Preparation Workshop Gasoline E85 E10 Chassis Dyno Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 6
EVAPORATIVE EMISSION TEST TYPES Canister Conditioning & CANLOAD SYSTEMS EVAP Test Preparation Testing or Diurnal Bleed Emission Hot Soak ORVR Point Source Running-Loss Test Component Test Test Puff-Loss Test Test / Spit back Test PF Canister Testing Test Determination Aging RL-SHED SHED SHED SHED Gasoline SHED SHED / SHED SHED Midi CANLOAD CANLOAD Chassis Dyno Chassis Dyno Evaporative THC Like Diurnal test, but Evaporative THC-Emissions after Onboard Refueling Evaporative THC Evaporative THC Testing of emissions “over the bleed emissions Sealed aTanks vehicle was driven (engine is Vapor Recovery test 20w aging emissions during Canister emissions during Aging Components of the day” while the System (openings of the fuel Test still hot) and tested determines fuel process driving the vehiclewith driving the vehicleGWC 300 cycles OEM Suppliers vehicle is parked system) are analyzedbased on 12h Transfer timing (chassis dyno TC vapor THC SHEDdyno on a chassis 24h followed on a chassis by 5 dyno, such as Fuel 24h, 48h, 72h separately by a DiurnalCycle VV/VT-SHED) required emissions coming measurement are measured at which cycles is buildofinto BWC Tanks or separate small Passive out of the tank by after points, where 3w and 20w the SHED chamber Canisters SHED within the new fuel being evaporated THC VV/VT-SHED chamber pumped into it might be emitted Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 7
EVAP PRODUCT PORTFOLIO VV/VT- SHED Point Source FUELLOAD RL SHED CANLOAD Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 8
EVAP APPLICATION: LD VEHICLES Unit Under Test SHED Chambers Sampling and Test Devices Analytics Conditioning Devices Chassis Dyno UUT SHED Variable Passive Running Heating Running ORVR Spit-Back Point THC CH4 Ethanol NH3 iCal iCal C anister with Fuel Purge Air Fueling Fuel Cond. Chamber Vol. / Temp Chamber Loss SHED Devices Loss CD Devices Devices Source Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis GDU CFO C ond. Vapor Cond. Station EU ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ USA ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ (✓) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Japan ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ China ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Brazil ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Korea ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ R f with FID (100% Ethanol) ✓ R e quire d ✓ O ption or Alternative ✓ Unde r discussion Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 9
Emission Legislation Introduction and Overview New Regulations and Requirements Evaporative Emissions System Solutions and Trends Summary Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 10
China GB 6a for Light Duty Vehicle ▪ Definition of a test type IV and VII ▪ Mix of EU and US regulation with more and more individual elements CHINA 6 ▪ Aggressive implementation time schedule ▪ New test cycles and workflows ▪ Reduced emission limits ▪ New testing and facility requirements Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 11
CHINA 6 – TIME SCHEDULE 23/12/2016: China GB 6a final version release Implementation time schedule New Type Register 6a 2019.01.01 2020.01.01 6b 2022.01.01 2023.01.01 RDE 2022.01.01 2023.01.01 Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 12
CHINA 6 – OVERVIEW ▪ Aligned to GTR-15 Requirements e.g. temperature conditioning for prep-drive cycle procedure and vehicle soak ▪ New emission limits 0.7g/test (HS+D, ORVR 0.05g/l) ▪ New temperature level Hot-Soak temperature set point 38°C High temperature prep-drive cycle 38°C ▪ Increased test duration Diurnal test procedure adjusted from 24h to 48h Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 13
CHINA 6 – INFORMATION Specific EVAP pre-conditioning drive cycles focusing on “worst-case” scenario canister purge CD HOST Automation system requirement – EVAP specific prep-cycles Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 14
CHINA 6 – INFORMATION High temperature Soak Temperature setting point: 38°C ± 2°C w Requires additional soak or baking enclosures – simplified temperature o conditioning (Can be done in a standard VT-SHED as well) r k High temperature chassis dyno driving cycle f Temperature setting point: 38°C ± 2°C l o Investment for RL-SHED or w Climate Chamber TC required ! High temperature Hot Soak Test (SHED) Temperature setting point: 38°C ± 2°C Standard VT-SHED Operation (Temperature during test: 33°C ~ 41°C) (Hot-Soak 38°C) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 15
CHINA 6 – ORVR REQUIREMENTS ▪ ORVR test procedure very similar to the existing US procedure ▪ Introduce the 2nd generation of the AVL FUELLOAD ▪ Providing additional ORVR fan for optimized and high dynamic analytical response ▪ Enhanced ORVR bag adapters and fuel nozzle interfaces Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 16
WLTP EVAP News ▪ Linked to GTR-15 ▪ Effective control of evaporative emission replacing UNR-83 GTR-19 ▪ Long-term canister aging process ▪ Real fuel vapor aging ▪ Fuel tank conditioning and aging ▪ Adressing sealed tank systems ▪ EU, Japan will implement it in 2019 (EURO 6d-temp-EVAP) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 17
GTR-19 INFORMATION Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 18
GTR-19 – SOAK REQUIREMENTS DIFFERENT SOAK DEMANDS FOR DIFFERENT WORKFLOWS SOAK 20 20°C ± 2°C SOAK 23 23°C ± 3°C May requires additional SOAK areas, SHED functionality or conditioning container “Tail pipe SOAK” solution SOAK -7°C SOAK 14°C New SHED temperature settings for SOAK SOAK 23°C procedures and combined SOAK/Diurnal test templates required Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 19
GTR-19 – VEHICLE CONDITIONING BAKING FUNCTION FOR VEHICLES OR VEHICLE COMPONENTS High temperature request of e.g. 50°C or higher… Additional baking containers or enclosures required Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 20
GTR-19 – VEHICLE PREPARATION DRAINING AND REFUELING PROCEDURE FOR SEALED TANK SYSTEMS Refueling temperatures 18°C ± 2°C Volume 15% ± 2% Volume 40% ± 2% FUELLOAD function with flexible setpoint adjustment for temperature and volume. Additionally, a special draining circuit with on-board tank and facility interface is integrated. Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 21
GTR-19 INFORMATION CANISTER CONDITIONING - PURGE New additional EVAP-specific pre-conditioning cycles. The phases are coming from the WLTC phases, but the sequence is different compared to the WLTC test runs for tail pipe emissions. WLTC EU EVAP Purge quality control requirement ▪ Validation of the purge quality 20°C ± 2°C 23°C ± 3°C Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 22
GTR-19 – TEMPERATURE SIMULATION DIURNAL TEMPERATURE SIMULATION Creating a new customized SHED/SHEDCon test template assigning a new or updated temperature profile (LUT) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 23
GTR-19 INFORMATION PF DETERMINATION OF PERMEABILITY PF PF Permeability Factor ▪ Additional VV/VT-SHED Midi / Mini DATA LOGGER for tank rigs and components Temp. ▪ Additional SOAK enclosures with stationary temperature conditioning (40°C) – Container Solutions ▪ Default setting worst case (120mg/d) ▪ PF = HC20w – HC3w Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 24
GTR-19 INFORMATION DIURNAL SHED VEHICLE TESTING & CALCULATION Enhanced workflow, 48h Diurnal Test including a more complex and new final calculation Old calculation New calculation MHS +MD1 < 2g (Total) MHS + MD1 + MD2 + PF + PF < 2g (Total) HS = Hot Soak D = Diurnal (Instead of reducing the Limit they modify the calculation same effect) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 25
GTR-19 – PUFF-LOSS SIMULATION CANISTER LOADING WITH PUFF-LOSS SIMULATED MASS Available standard function of CANLOAD – simulation of dynamic loading rates Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 26
TESTING – DYNAMIC LOADING BUTANE/N2 BASED DYNAMIC LOAD SIMULATION Puff-Loss simulation, sealed tank systems (flow reduction ~ depressurization) Screenshots shows set flow [l/min] vs. real flow [l/min] combined with canister weight [g] response Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 27
GTR-19 – SEALED TANK SYSTEMS PUFF-LOSS SHED TEST PROCEDURE SHED, SHEDCon requires a new test template, new sequence and report Remote access port for ECU-control Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 28
GTR-19 – CANISTER CONDITIONING PURGE FLOW MEASUREMENT AND SIMULATION CANLOAD dynamic purge function available… Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 29
DYNAMIC PURGE QUALITY ASCII-FILE BASED FLOW SIMULATION (e.g. 1Hz Data) According to CARB Regulation Maximum flow validation set flow 16.39 l/min real flow 16.36 l/min Max. difference: -0.03 l/min (-0.2%) Average flow result (37 min.) validation set flow 5.03 l/min real flow 5.09 l/min Max. difference: +0.06 l/min (+1.2%) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 30
GTR-19 AUX. CANISTER PREPARE BREAK-THROUGH CANISTER CONDITIONING Standard parallel process during the UUT canister purge Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 31
GTR-19 – CANISTER CONDITIONING CANLOAD BALANCE REQUIREMENT – RESOLUTION / ACCURACY New Required Accuracy ±0.02 g Actual CANLOAD Standard equipped with 0.01g balances Upgrade available for existing systems The new set of standard balances also improves the Gravimetric Loading-Control of the CANLOAD system. Both balances are having the same resolution and accuracy. Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 32
GRAVIMETRIC LOADING CONTROL ▪ A specific algorithm realizes a gravimetric control operation during the canister loading process. ▪ Using the online-weight information's, MFC flow rates, temperature and the target set point the automatic gravimetric control guarantees a highly accurate loading procedure. ▪ Volume compensation of tubing and system parts ▪ PI-Control is available for both operation modes: ✓ Butane / N2 ✓ Fuel Vapor / N2 Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 33
GTR-19 INFORMATION FUEL VAPOR CANISTER AGING AND STABILISATION Combined test system setup Butane + Fuel Fuel vapor/N2 stabilization (300 cycles) followed by 5 cycles Butane/N2 BWC validation (statistical evaluation) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 34
COMBINED TESTING – BUTANE / FUEL VAPOR System provides combined testing of canister – butane/N2 and fuel vapor/N2 loading within 1 test project. Start-up selection between Butane or Fuel possible Defined by 3 individual settings for high flexibility of testing by using ▪ Butane Cycles ▪ Fuel Vapor Cycles ▪ Workflow Sequences Calculation of the overall cycles: Butane and fuel cycles will be added and multiplied with the amount of sequences Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 35
HOW TO CONTROL 50:50 MIXTURE? REGULATED STANDARS FOR VAPOR MIX GTR-19 Procedure §5.1.3.1.1 After the temperature conditioning test and vibration test, the canister shall be aged with a mixture of Type 1 E10 market fuel as specified in paragraph 5.1.3.1.1.1. of this annex and nitrogen or air with a 50 ± 15 percent fuel vapour volume. The fuel vapour fill rate shall be kept between 60 ± 20 g/h. The canister shall be loaded to the corresponding breakthrough. Breakthrough shall be considered accomplished when the cumulative quantity of hydrocarbons emitted equals 2 grams. CARB Bleed Emission Test Procedure §III.D.12.1.2. Carbon Canister System Purge/Load Cycling with Fuel Vapor. The carbon canister system shall be cycle aged no less than 10 cycles using the gasoline referenced in section III.D.12.1.1 by loading the canister system to 2-gram breakthrough with either a mixture of fuel vapor and nitrogen (50 ± 15 percent fuel vapor by volume) or a mixture of fuel vapor and air (50 ± 15 percent fuel vapor by volume), at a fuel vapor fill rate of 40 to 80 grams per hour. Each loading is followed by purging the canister system with 300 canister bed volume exchanges at 0.8 cfm. ▪ How to control and measure the fuel vapor/N2 mixture? ▪ Is it possible to combine it with an efficiency parameter for the fuel exchange management? Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 36
PROBLEM STATEMENT What is required to verify the 50±15% (vol.) fuel vapor concentration in the mixture? ▪ Direct measurement is difficult due to variation in vapor properties caused by fuel weathering rvapor = f(temperature, mass lost) ▪ Mass concentration is a more direct measurement but does not satisfy §III.D.12.1.2 Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 37
AVL SOLUTION FOR FUEL VAPOR MIX Solution kit for online validation Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 38
TEST DATA EVALUATION ▪ Data reliability is better than expected ▪ Time alignment is important for online calculations (concentration) ▪ Optimized GDM handling ensures the accuracy and reliability (purge, pre-condition, calibration) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 39
GDM CONCLUSIONS ▪ Use of Fuel Vapor requires heating of “Loading Components” to prevent condensation ▪ Heated evaporator, heated transfer line, heated enclosure, heated canister ▪ Incorporation of Gas Density Meter (GDM) allows for direct online validation of 50 ± 15 % volumetric fuel vapor concentration ▪ Automatic quality checks during purge of canister (N 2, Air, Butane) ▪ Automatic calibration routine before and drift check after test sequence ▪ AVL has developed a canister loading system that is able to validate Fuel Vapor Concentration according to regulatory requirements ▪ Can be used with multiple fuel types ▪ GDM calibration method ensures accuracy ▪ System provides a fuel optimized consumption mode ensuring 50:50 fuel vapor mix by minimized fuel consumption Certification fuel is expensive! Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 40
Emission Legislation Introduction and Overview New Regulations and Requirements Evaporative Emissions System Solutions and Trends Summary Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 41
TECHNOLOGY: 2025 (AVL Prediction 3/2018 Scenario ”Medium”) Hydrogen Fuel Cell Fuel Cells: limited to specific markets Battery Electric Vehicle BEV: Dependent on infrastructure, incentives and city access Plug-In Hybrid: CAFE and city access as major driver Full Hybrid: 60 up to 650V Technology ICE / Electric Motor Mild Hybrid: • 48 V in various configurations P0 – P4 • Power Increase 15 20 30 kW • ICE utilizes synergies ICE: • Significantly higher effort for emission compliance (RDE, China6, SULEV xx, …), Internal Combustion Engine • “Zero Impact Emission Concepts” starting • Increasing share turbocharging + Rightsizing, • Advanced boosting, exhaust energy recuperation, full map stoichiometric, EGR • E-fuels and E-gas increasing Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 42
TECHNOLOGY: Global Powertrain mix USA EU China ▪ Majority will remain with ICE ▪ Strong trend to mild electrification ▪ Strong trend to electrified powertrain and ▪ Almost 100% Gasoline market ▪ Plug-in will depend very much CAFE and BEV by political and legislation reasons city access requirements ▪ China sees Electromobility as a major ▪ Diesel will be replaced by Gasoline ICE driver to promote Chinese automotive industry ▪ Almost 100% Gasoline ICE Legend: Mild Hybrid Plug-In ICE Full Hybrid BEV FCEV (incl. 48V) Hybrid Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 43
Much More R&D Effort… US GTR-19 CHINA 6a TIER 3 / LEV III (WLTP EVAP) +100% +200% Canisters BWC designed: Canisters BWC designed: ▪ 2day diurnal ▪ 2day diurnal ▪ Volume 1l 2l ▪ ORVR R&D Canisters BWC designed: ▪ Volume 1l 3l work ▪ 3day diurnal R&D DIURNAL required ▪ ORVR work ▪ Volume 4l required DIURNAL ORVR HOT SOAK DIURNAL ORVR HOT SOAK S OEM‘s have to manage 3 different fuel storage system concepts and designs HOT SOAK RUNNING LOSS ▪ The exended version for US (EPA, CARB) ▪ China version with capability for further modification ▪ Smaller and simplified version for EU Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 44
Much More Testing Effort… New regulation, workflows and new fuel storage concepts require more planning effort and time. Assumption: Canister Durability Duration in total Canister Aging 305 Cycles Canister BWC = 200 gr Testing (step1) about 8 days Method (step2) about 52 days Volume = 3l Parallel processing possible Fuel Storage Duration in total System Rig Test min. 142 days Preparation Workflow – Canister aging & Fuel storage rig test EVAP Emission Workflow Current EU Duration in EVAP Test total about 52 h New EU Duration in EVAP Test Increased effort 2 d 3 d total about 76 h New EU Duration in EVAP Test SealedTank Increased effort 2 d 4 d total about 94 h Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 45
EMISSION LIMITS & TRENDS Global trend of emission limit reduction with the consequence of a modified focus in: ▪ Higher importance of detection limits ▪ Data reliability and quality ▪ Workflow management ▪ Testing process accuracy Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 46
HOW TO HANDLE LOWER LIMITS? …provides a high accurate …controls the fully automated measurements including • AMAi60 SA • Workflow test sequences, provides reference interfaces for gas SHED Control GUI, data handling, divider and CFO devices • Gas Supply processing and reporting …detailed analysis of gas supply required Analytics Automation SHED FID SHEDCon Reference System Devices Design • Materials …allows us to calibrate, • Probe …provides analytical valve check and simulate various matrix for C3H8 injection and concentration levels with the • iCAL CFO LE Handling multiple sample point highest possible reliability selection Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 47
PROPANE INJECTION PROCEDURE ZERO/SPAN ZERO/SPAN Check Adjust C3H8 Injection Sample CFO Bypass/Stabilisation ▪ Fully automated propane injection using a iCAL CFO LE device ▪ System response shows mixing quality and analytical dynamic of the FID as well Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 48
PROPANE INJECTION MASSES Summary: With the new calibration method we will have a possibility to inject a propane mass of 20mg for emission simulation. (Standard iCAL CFO-LE 100 mg) ▪ Injection Duration 60 s ▪ Injection Flow Rate of 20 (10) sml/min Injection Mass 40 (20) mg Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 49
TYP. ACCURACY MIDI SHED 15 - EXAMPLE Analytical system reading ▪ Reading difference of FID 0.05 ppmC MIDI SHED ▪ Volume SHED = 15 m³ ▪ Volume BAG = 780 l ▪ Pressure and temperature reading for initial and final measurement identical Summary: Resolution A change of 0.01 ppmC results in a mass change of about 0.085 mg A change of 0.05 ppmC results in a mass change of about 0.43 mg (Fuel System Limit is 54mg CARB or PF-Default 120mg) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 50
TYP. ACCURACY FS SHED 50 - EXAMPLE Analytical system reading ▪ Reading difference of FID 0.05 ppmC FS SHED ▪ Volume SHED = 50 m³ ▪ Volume BAG = 3900 l ▪ Pressure and temperature reading for initial and final measurement identical Summary: Resolution A change of 0.01 ppmC results in a mass change of about 0.277 mg A change of 0.05 ppmC results in a mass change of about 1.39 mg (LD lowest limit - CARB HS+2D is 300mg) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 51
BACKGROUND LEVELS RL……….Magnum…..…….…Maxi………….. FullSize………………Midi…………… Mini……………Micro………..Passive (Trucks/SUVs - LD Vehicles - Motorcycles - Tanksystems - Canisters - Bleed) 35 mg……….10 mg….………8-10 mg………….. 7-9 mg………………5-6 mg…………… 2-5 mg ……………0-3 mg Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 52
US SPECIFIC REQUESTS AND UPGRADES CANLOAD Function SHED Function Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 53
ADDITIONAL SHED TESTING ▪ Target are fuel storage and supply components, e.g. tubing, adapters, pumps, etc. ▪ Specific R&D setup for individual evaporation determination ▪ Advanced application for MC, SORE, etc. Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 54
DATA ACQUISITION – SOAK AREA Soak Area Soak Area DATA LOGGER iGEM Charge Meter T, rF, p_baro CANLOAD System E E E DATA LOGGER For vehicle data ( T_oil, T_coolant) Hybrid vehicles require both ! Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 55
SHED FUNCTION DEMANDS Diurnal SOAK 23°C BAKING 50°C SOAK 14°C Standard Procedure Advanced Procedure Advanced Procedure Bleed PUFF-LOSS Advanced Procedure RL-Test ORVR LEAK CHECK Advanced Procedure SOAK 20°C Standard Procedure SOAK 38°C Hot Soak Standard Procedure DBLT Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 56
SYSTEM CERTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION Market is sensitized ! Is the system compliant according to the actual regulation? How can I prove and argue the compliance? Is the calibration and annual service documented and stored? How about ISO 17025? Solutions & Concepts available? Dakks Calibration? Ready for regulation audits? Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 57
EVAP WORKFLOW / FACILITY INTEGRATION Optimized workflows, device networking, facility interfaces, data links (pre- and post data) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 58
Emission Legislation Introduction and Overview New Regulations and Requirements Evaporative Emissions System Solutions and Trends Summary Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 59
SUMMARY – HOW AVL CAN SUPPORT? APPLICATION ORIENTED FUNCTIONALITY REQUESTED Complete support of the entire Evaporative workflow ▪ Automation software and ▪ Hardware devices plus ▪ Application know how training Supporting global emission legislations ▪ USA EPA and CARB ▪ EU Legislation old and up-coming Euro-6temp-EVAP ▪ UN-Regulation support UN-Reg No. 83 and UN-GTR-19 ▪ China-6a and b Advanced functionality for ▪ R&D work, simulation ▪ Efficiency - workflow Complete support of the entire test facility workflow ▪ Evaporative emission tests ▪ Chassis Dyno Tailpipe emission testing ▪ Vehicle preparation, Soak, … ▪ …. Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 60
SUMMARY ▪ The supplier with the most complete EVAP portfolio ▪ The only one with a focus on analytical analysis ▪ The most integrated EVAP automation system into the entire workflow of test facility (Tailpipe and EVAP emissions) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 61
SHED TESTING SOLUTIONS & TRENDS Since the initial start of evaporative emission rules 1970 in California, the regulation trends and demands did not change much in the last decades. In the last 2-3 years, the awareness of the entire evaporative testing capabilities changed. Various reasons e.g. new test sequences, stricter emission limits, additional CO2 targets, bio-fuels and new vehicle drive technologies forces the OEM’s and component manufacturers to invest into new equipment and testing solutions. Know-how, long-term experience and a complete product and solution portfolio is key to achieve best test data quality, reliability and global correlation targets. Traditional Standard Testing Setup Newest Testing Solutions & Trends Single device supplier Global solution partner providing a complete product and application portfolio System design on demand of OEM or homemade Industrialized standard products fulfilling global demands in terms of safety and operation standards solution Local supplier Global accountable partners for sales, service and application support Supplier trained by customer Development partnership with specific testing expertise between supplier and customer Development try & error Simulation services and R&D partner for e.g. flow and temperature simulation for vehicle and UUT Single test report Trends Vehicle testing and certification workbook Entire workflow data and test results including information of soaking, fueling, canister conditioning, prep-cycles, Hot-Soak + Diurnal testing, etc. Manual single test operation and data handling C entralized data and workflow management Hard-coded test sequence Flexible and dynamic test configuration with multiple template and stencil database Fixed volume SHED VV/VT-SHED including an additional volume reduction BAG for improvement of the analytical response up to 25% Manual refueling operation Remote controlled automatic ORVR test procedure with online-data validation Supplier of environmental chambers Expert in analytical emission testing, long -term experience in FID technologies with clear understanding of the relationship and dependencies between exhaust emission and evaporative emission testing (thermal management of vehicle - depends on C D test cell design) Personnel attention during test runs required Unmanned operation 24/7, un-limited days (long-term diurnal testing) Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 62
CANISTER TESTING SOLUTIONS & TRENDS Beside the general various market trends(see SHED Testing Solutions & Trends), the RDE (Real Drive Emissions) discussion “bei ng more realistic” are pushing the entire testing and simulation environment to higher level of flexibility and functionality to fulf ill future demands of - vehicle and device testing, certification and development. Local emission levels and problems are forcing governments to modify or create their individual legal emission regulation tar gets (e.g. China, Beijing) with possible consequences like: ✓ Extended temperature and humidity simulation (canister purge air) ✓ Advanced module testing e.g. fuel storage leak check procedure (acc. EPA ✓ Dynamic (acc. Drive cycles) canister purge procedures (not just stationary) §1066.985) ✓ Dynamic load simulation (not just stationary) ✓ OBD validation and simulation functions ✓ Combined canister stabilization and conditioning procedures ✓ Long-term durability testing and in-use test cases ✓ Real vapor conditioning (instead of synthetic gas conditioning - C4H10 / ✓ Online data calculation and validation(not just cyclic results) N2) ✓ Specific R&D tools and functions for example ✓ Improved accuracy, repeatability and control modes, Adv. PID loading ▪ hybrid flow simulation control f(RVP, T, Q, m) ▪ pressurized tank systems – puffer control ✓ Additional COP demands ▪ purge control simulation and test, boost pump interfaces ▪ purge efficiency interface, pulsed inline heater control Actual testing setups covering most of the actual legal requirements but are they ready for future technologies, testing trends and emission visions? Public | emission.marketing@avl.com Live W e binar - EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS | Patrick Ulmerich / Michael Scheytt | 11. Se ptember 2018 | 63
Thank You www.avl.com emission.marketing@avl.com
You can also read