Legal Issues For Private Timberland Landowners - Stephen B. Schrock Morris, Manning and Martin, LLP
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Legal Issues For Private Timberland Landowners Stephen B. Schrock Morris, Manning and Martin, LLP 2011 National Conference of The Forest Landowners Association Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia © 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
MMM Timberland Transactions MMM’s Timberland Team has helped Clients make Timberland Investments in all parts of the World
Types of Timber Ownership Fee Simple – Own Land, Trees, Improvements and Minerals (if any) Timber Deed – Own Trees with right to access Timber Lease – Lease land with right to grow Trees and any other uses permitted by the Lease
Timber Volumes and Acres and Harvesting Purchase Price of the Timberland is often based on or adjusted by the timber volumes determined by new Cruise or audit of existing Cruise. Formula for adjustment complicated because must agree on cruise specification and unit values for each type of timber product. Often there is a collar around the agreed volumes (less and more) where no adjust is made to Purchase Price. Acres can be determined “roughly’ by cruise but most accurate is to survey, if possible. Must also address timber harvesting between contract execution (or inventory date) and closing.
Earnest Money Often a Purchaser (especially a large Purchaser) of Timberlands argues it should not have to make a Earnest Money Deposit since it is spending a lot of money on due diligence Advantage to Purchaser, however, that in the case of a default under the Contract by Purchaser the damages due Seller can be made limited to the Earnest Money as Liquidated Damages
Seller’s Contract Representations and Warranties Sellers want to sell Timberland “As Is, Where Is” with no representations and Warranties with Buyer doing all due diligence and/or a “free look” period. Buyers should ask for reps concerning legal status and authority of Seller, binding agreement, title, adverse claims, tax assessments and rollback taxes, environmental matters, contracts, permits, leases, trees, casualty, and access. Consider who is making reps and Warranties and beware of post closing escrows and side agreements. Often reps will be limited survival period after closing, basket or deductible before a claim for breach can be made and a cap on overall amount of claims for breach
Legal and Practical Access • Obviously, a tract of timberland is worth less and is difficult to utilize if there is no access by the owner. • Frequently, a tract of timberland does not directly abut a State or County maintained open public right- of-way road. • Difficult to tell from survey, plats and even GIS which roads are “public roads.” • State or County road maps are helpful.
Mistake: Roads = Access • Does the existence of a “road” (see RED roads on this tract map) mean legal access? • There are many roads shown on the map but they are “logging roads.” • Adjacent landowners (especially timber companies) often afford access to one another by informal oral agreements. • Relationships, however, can sometimes “sour” between private landowners. • Access to part of tract may not get to all the tract (wetland, bottomlands).
Steps to Insure Access In some instances, there exists (or counsel can obtain) written easement agreements from adjacent landowners to a public right-of-way. With “informal” agreements between landowners it is difficult or impossible to get parties to reduce this agreement to writing. A Title Company is sometimes willing to offer “insured” access insurance based on a sworn affidavit from a seller and/or its predecessor that it has used the road for a period of time to gain adverse possession. A completely landlocked tract may have “Easement by Implication” (depends on local law) which Title Company may insure, but may have to bring a lawsuit to establish such an easement. Ultimately, if tract lacks “legal” or “insured” (by title company) access, purchaser of timberland tract must weigh the risk that it has “practical access.”
Environmental Issues Every Purchaser of Timberlands should have performed a Phase 1 ESA of the Property in order to claim the “Innocent Landowner Defense” against governmental liability under CERCLA For Timberlands most ESAs will find trash dumps and similar problems In some area, however, like where mining has taken place could be significant issues such as sludge pond. A Purchaser should want the right to “carve out’ an area with environmental problem. Sellers will resist because they do not want to be left with parts of the property here and there
Timberland Surveys A survey of the property is the most accurate way to determine the number of acres and boundary lines of a tract of property and to confirm the historical deed legals, many of which were vague at best. For Timberlands, however, the expense and time to survey a large tract of Timberland meant that surveys were being done. With the advance in GPS and GIS technology, we are better able to do the above.
Mineral Rights It is rarely worth the time & expense to do a full chain of title search for minerals, especially in areas where no valuable minerals exits. The standard title search will often show mineral reservations so since the mineral estate is often the dominate estate the holder of the mineral rights can mine the property and destroy trees. Compensation is usually provided for by law or in the mineral reservation, it does not make a timberland owner whole because it loses the value increase as the trees grow. In areas where known mining exist (Kentucky, Tennessee, parts of Florida) the Timberland owner should enter in a Surface Damage Agreement with the mineral Owner
Potential Opportunities? • Biomass Projects – In the US South, 135 wood-consuming companies announced bioenergy projects with potential wood use of 55.9 million tons/year by 2020. Recent increase in “Pellet” Plants for shipping to the EU Counties who have made commitments to use more renewable fuels • Carbon Trading – Appears to be great possibilities for timberland but what/when will US Congress pass and will the President sign? Will it get off the ground? • Conservation Easements – Represents one of the best Opportunities (federal deduction and state tax credits) IF the timberland owner is willing to restrict long- term use to timberlands and perhaps minor development (affects value and marketability).
Conclusions Investing in and Owning Timberland is Unique – it is not the same commercial or residential real estate. Timberland is a good basic long term investment: lumber and paper prices vary but Trees Grow! In addition to basic timberland ownership, many Potential Opportunities exist, but it is yet uncertain if Viable and Economical.
MMM Timberland Team REAL ESTATE Steve Schrock sschrock@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7678 Rebecca Vandiver rvandiver@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7669 Tom Gryboski tgryboski@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7660 Doug Selph dselph@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7708 Wenona Mills wmills@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7695 INTERNATIONAL, TAX & INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Glenn Dunaway gdunaway@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7676 Tim Pollock tpollock@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7710 Chuck Connors cconnors@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7679 Karen Reschly kreschly@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7685 ENVIRONMENTAL Gerald Pouncey gpouncey@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7738 Heather Friedman hfriedman@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7781 REITS & SECURITIES Chuck Beaudrot cbeaudrot@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7753 ALTERNATIVE FUELS, BIOMASS & “GREEN” PRACTICES Greg Chafee gchafee@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7693 David Calhoun dcalhoun@mmmlaw.com 404.504.7613
MMM Brazilian Strategic Alliance Aldo de Cresci Neto Fleury Malheiros, Gasparini, De Cresci e Nogueira de Lima Advogados Av. Paulista, 1842 - Ed. Cetenco Plaza, Torre Norte - 2º underground CEP 01310-923 São Paulo, Brazil Phone: 55 11 2171-1300 Fax: 55 11 2171-1399
Questions??? (a/k/a free legal advice)
Disclaimer The information presented and contained within this document are provided by MMM as general information only, and do not, and are not intended to constitute legal advice. Any opinions expressed within this document are solely the opinion of the individual author(s) and may not reflect the opinions of MMM, individual attorneys, or personnel, or the opinions of MMM clients. This document is Copyright ©2011 Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP, All Rights Reserved worldwide.
You can also read