IS THE CASE FOR CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE DEAD? - ED BALLS AND ANNA STANSBURY DISCUSSED BY - Peterson Institute for International ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
IS THE CASE FOR DISCUSSED BY LAWRENCE SUMMERS CENTRAL BANK AND INDEPENDENCE DEAD? ADAM POSEN PETERSON INSTITUTE FOR ED BALLS INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS AND WASHINGTON, DC ANNA STANSBURY APRIL 23, 2018
SINCE THE 1980S, MOST COUNTRIES INCREASED CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE 1 .8 CBI over time (advanced economies) USA CHE CAN .6 EUR AUS 1980s DNK .4 JPN GBR SWE NOR .2 NZL 0 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 2003 Source: Balls, Howat and Stansbury (2018). 3 CBI data from Grilli, Masciandaro and Tabellini (1991) and Arnone, Laurens, Segalotto and Sommer (2007) Euro area data point for 1980s is weighted average of the 1980s CBI of the 2003 Euro member states
BUT THE INFLATION-INDEPENDENCE CORRELATION DISAPPEARED PRE-CRISIS 4 Average annual inflation, 2000-2008 Inflation and Central Bank Independence, 2000-2008 AUS KOR 3 USA NZL CAN EUR DNK 2 ISR NOR GBR SWE CHE 1 0 JPN 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 Central Bank Independence 2003, GMT measure Source: Balls, Howat and Stansbury (2018). 4 CBI data from Arnone, Laurens, Segalotto and Sommer (2007); inflation data from World Bank WDI
WHAT HAS CHANGED SINCE THE FINANCIAL CRISIS? Pre-crisis: Consensus that central bank independence a good thing Build-up of financial sector risks Low and stable inflation Post-crisis: Consensus around central bank independence under pressure New macroprudential responsibilities, tools and structures Too-low inflation and zero lower bound 5
PUBLIC AND POLITICAL CRITICISM 6
ACADEMIC CRITICISM: 1/ POSEN CRITIQUE “The impact of central bank independence on economic outcomes is highly overrated… ...It’s not to say central bank independence wasn’t important… but it took place against this background of a common effort across all central bankers to bring down inflation… …Central bank independence was as much a reflection of the effort and the credibility gained as a cause.” Adam Posen (2017). Speech at Bank of England “20 years on” conference. 7
ACADEMIC CRITICISM: 2/ ALESINA CRITIQUE “One argument put forward by Fischer and Debelle (1994) is that the policy goal, say the target level of inflation, should be chosen by elected politicians, while the Central Bank should have the independence of choosing the policy instruments more appropriate to achieve that goal… …This is a rather "minimalist" view of the meaning of Central Bank independence” Alberto Alesina and Andrea Stella (2011). “The Politics of Monetary Policy”. Handbook of Monetary Economics 8
ACADEMIC CRITICISM: 3/ BUITER CRITIQUE “Central banks in most of the advanced economies have become too powerful… …In particular, they have accrued a host of deeply political responsibilities and powers.They have neither the legitimacy nor the capability or skills to discharge all these responsibilities effectively. I propose a return to narrow central banking.” Willem Buiter (2014). “Central Banks: Powerful, Political, and Unaccountable?” Journal of the British Academy 9
ACADEMIC CRITICISM: 4/ SUMMERS CRITIQUE “When the primary policy challenge for central banks was establishing credibility that the printing press was under control, it was appropriate for them to jealously guard their independence. When the challenge is to accelerate, rather than brake, economies, more cooperation with domestic fiscal authorities and foreign counterparts is necessary” Lawrence Summers (2016). “The Age of Secular Stagnation”, Foreign Affairs 10
OUR RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS TWO IMPORTANT DIMENSIONS TO CBI Operational independence: the ability of the central bank to select and use monetary tools with autonomy Political independence: the absence of possibility for political influence over the central bank e.g. Bank of England is operationally independent but not politically independent – government sets inflation target ECB and Fed are both operationally and politically independent 11
ADVANCED ECONOMIES INCREASED OPERATIONAL CBI (BUT NOT POLITICAL) Operational Independence over time Political Independence over time AUS 1 1 USA CAN CHE .8 .8 GBR EUR JPN .6 .6 USA CHE 1980s 1980s NZL DNK EUR CAN .4 NOR .4 SWE AUS DNK SWE .2 .2 NOR GBR 0 JPN NZL 0 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 2003 2003 Source: Balls, Howat and Stansbury (2018). 12 CBI data from Grilli, Masciandaro and Tabellini (1991) and Arnone, Laurens, Segalotto and Sommer (2007) Euro area data point for 1980s is weighted average of the 1980s CBI of the 2003 Euro member states
ONLY OPERATIONAL CBI MATTERED FOR ADVANCED ECONOMIES IN 1970S/80S… Inflation and Operational Independence, 1980s (AVPlot) Inflation and Political Independence, 1980s (AVPlot) 10 10 GRC Average annual inflation, 1980s Average annual inflation, 1980s GRC NOR 5 5 NOR CHE ITA PRT AUS NZL PRT SWE DNK NZL CHE DNK LUX GBR CAN USA AUS SWE IRL ITA 0 USA LUX 0 FRA IRL GBR BEL FRA FIN CAN DEU ESP NLD AUT ESP DEU BEL NLD FIN -5 AUT -5 JPN JPN -.6 -.4 -.2 0 .2 .4 -.4 -.2 0 .2 .4 Operational Independence 1980s Political Independence 1980s coef = -6.067239, se = 2.7798183, t = -2.18 coef = .83703529, se = 3.8915158, t = .22 … contrary to the Alesina critique 13
…AND BY 2000S THEY ALL HAD HIGH OPERATIONAL CBI AND LOW INFLATION Inflation and Operational Independence, 1980s and 2000s 20 GRC PRT 15 Average inflation NZL ITA 10 ESP IRL NOR AUS SWE FRA FIN GBR DNK CAN USA 5 LUX BEL AUT CHE DEU NLD KOR USA AUS JPN ISR CAN NOR GBR NZL DNK EUR SWE 0 JPN CHE 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 Operational Independence 1980s, fitted values 1980s 2000s … suggesting that – notwithstanding the Posen critique – the 1980s/1990s case for operational 14 independence remains
BUT CRISIS HAS GIVEN CENTRAL BANKS ADDITIONAL POWERS AND CHALLENGES Macro-prudential policy Can central banks manage these extra powers and responsibilities? Or is this an area central banks should withdraw from? (Buiter) Monetary-fiscal coordination Does central bank independence make this impossible? (Summers) 15
CRITERIA FOR REFORM: WHEN DOES INDEPENDENCE MAKE SENSE? When should a policy function be located in an independent institution? Political incentive to “cheat” Clearly-defined goal and effective accountability mechanism No first-order distributional impact No significant fiscal impact When should that institution be the central bank? No conflict with monetary policy Relevant expertise in the central bank 16
MONETARY POLICY When should a policy function be located in an independent institution? Political incentive to “cheat” Clearly-defined goal and effective accountability mechanism No first-order distributional impact No significant fiscal impact When should that institution be the central bank? No conflict with monetary policy Relevant expertise in the central bank 17
SYSTEMIC RISK OVERSIGHT AND MACRO- PRUDENTIAL POLICY When should a policy function be located in an independent institution? Political incentive to “cheat” Clearly-defined goal and effective accountability mechanism No first-order distributional impact No significant fiscal impact When should that institution be the central bank? No conflict with monetary policy Relevant expertise in the central bank 18
IS BUITER RIGHT THAT CENTRAL BANKS SHOULD GET OUT OF MACROPRUDENTIAL POLICY? Macro-prudential policy and systemic risk management is clearly a risk for both the credibility of central bank independence and democratic accountability Hard to define a clear goal First order distributional impact Risk of significant fiscal impact Potential conflict with monetary policy But in our paper we argue that operational independence can help provide a solution 19
OUR SOLUTION FOR MACRO-PRUDENTIAL POLICY Separate systemic risk oversight and macro-prudential policy. A systemic risk oversight body should: Be responsible for monitoring systemic risks and setting policy priorities Include members from the central bank, regulators and the government Be chaired by a government representative A macro-prudential body should: Be operationally independent from government Bring together central bank and financial regulators Be led by the central bank Argues for a hybrid model between current Fed and Bank of England 20
MONETARY-FISCAL POLICY COORDINATION When should a policy function be located in an independent institution? Political incentive to “cheat” Clearly-defined goal and effective accountability mechanism No first-order distributional impact No significant fiscal impact When should that institution be the central bank? No conflict with monetary policy 21 Relevant expertise in the central bank 21
IS SUMMERS RIGHT THAT MONETARY-FISCAL COORDINATION AND CBI CONFLICT? Lack of monetary-fiscal coordination was clearly a big problem post-crisis “Fiscal policymakers, far from helping the economy, appeared to be actively working to hinder it… Monetary policy … cannot carry the entire burden” Ben Bernanke (2015) “A stronger collective policy approach is urgently needed, focusing on a greater use of fiscal and pro-growth structural policies, to strengthen growth and reduce financial risks” Catherine Mann, OECD Chief Economist (2016) “It is essential that fiscal policy supports the nascent recovery. Planned near- term fiscal tightening will be a drag on growth” IMF (2013) United Kingdom Article IV Consultation In our paper we explore whether operational independence can help find a solution 22
ONE POSSIBLE SOLUTION FOR MONETARY-FISCAL COORDINATION One possible solution could be a fiscal open letter system Once the interest rate goes below a pre-defined threshold close to the ZLB, the central bank writes a quarterly open letter to the government, with its view on the appropriate stance of fiscal policy to help meet the inflation target (and support growth) This would meet three conditions: Decision to send letter triggered by the central bank Ability to send letter confined to the zero lower bound Government retains control over stance and content of fiscal policy But – still a risk that central bank may be drawn into politics? 23
CONCLUDING REMARKS The case for operational independence is not dead (if it was ever alive – Adam?) But since the financial crisis independent central banks have become more unpopular as their powers and responsibilities have increased. Our paper argues that the solution must strike the right balance between operational independence and effective political oversight. No country has it right yet on macroprudential policy: the U.S. and U.K. can learn from each other 24
APPENDIX SLIDES 25
CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE OVER TIME IN EMERGING ECONOMIES 1 CBI over time (emerging economies) CRI .8 .6 EGY HND PER TUR 1980s LBN NIC UGA PHL MLT ARG KEN ETH .4 BHS ZWE BOL TZA THA NGA IND MEX ISL HUN ZMB MYS CHN BRB GHA ROM ISR BWA COL IDN VEN SGP MAR KOR .2 PAN PAK CHL BRA POL QAT ZAF NPL SRB SVN HRV BIH URY MKD 0 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 2003 26
POLITICAL AND OPERATIONAL INDEPENDENCE OVER TIME IN EMERGING ECONOMIES Political Independence over time Operational Independence over time 1 1 CRI .8 .8 ZWE NGA EGY MYS PER ARG NIC HND MEX BWA LBN CRI HUN .6 .6 IND UGA ETH TZA KEN PHL HND TUR 1980s 1980s NIC LBN ISL TUR GHA COL EGY PER MLT ROM BRB .4 .4 THA ZMB CHN BOL MAR MLT IDN CHN ETH BOL PAN SGP NPL CHL POL COL ZWE ZMB THA BRA PHL ARG .2 .2 ZAF ISR ROM ISL ISR UGA VEN PAK MEX VEN BWA KEN MAR ZAF GHA PAK IDN HUN TZA IND NGA NPL SGP CHL URY POL PAN QAT URY BRA 0 0 BRB QAT MYS 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 2003 2003 No IMF program 1993-2002 IMF program 1993-2002 No IMF program 1993-2002 IMF program 1993-2002 27
You can also read