INTRODUCING ROOTS 2019 - Spark Media
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
WHY ARE WE HERE You can’t build a beautiful model without a plan / manual (architecture) Good news: our profession now has the architecture (framework) to guide all our marketing efforts 2
WHY ARE WE HERE 01 WHAT WE KNOW FOR SURE • Whilst buyer behaviour might adapt to changing market realities… • …our brains don’t • Well they do change but they will not change in our lifetime • We are wired to respond in certain ways 3
WHY ARE WE HERE MORE GOOD NEWS • The more we learn about the evolution in marketing thinking, the more we see the value and relevance of ROOTS data. Source: (After all, the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute has) 5
1. Credentials and Methodology 2. Highlights of the many categories 01 3. Buyer Behaviour DISCOVERIES 4. Media 5. Conclusion CREDENTIALS & METHODOLOGY 66
HISTORY & CREDENTIALS 02 HOW IS ROOTS CONDUCTED? • Multistage clustered random probability sampling • Research Universe - decision makers (shoppers) aged 18 plus, living in formal households within selected local newspaper footprints across South Africa. • Decision makers are questioned in their home by a trained interviewer using a tablet to capture the answers. • This is known as a CAPI interview (Computer Assisted Personal Interview). • The interview lasts for 50 minutes. • Sample sizes vary from 150 to 300 interviews per area depending on it’s size and diversity. • This ensures a safe margin of error (95% confidence level). 7
HISTORY & CREDENTIALS 02 ROOTS FOOTPRINT LIMPOPO - 1 = more than 100 MPUMALANGA - 7 individual footprints NORTH WEST - 1 TSHWANE (PRETORIA) - 7 FREE STATE - 4 EAST RAND - 9 JHB NORTH - 8 WEST RAND - 4 NORTHERN CAPE - 1 JHB SOUTH - 5 EMFULENI (VAAL) - 5 SOWETO - 10 ETHEKWINI (DURBAN) - 9 OTHER WESTERN CAPE - 3 ZULULAND - 1 NORTH COAST - 2 EASTERN CAPE - 4 MID SOUTH COAST - 3 GARDEN ROUTE - 3 LOWER SOUTH COAST - 3 CAPE TOWN - 13 REST OF KZN - 4 8
HISTORY & CREDENTIALS 02 RESPONDENT BASE - SPREAD OF SEM ROOTS 2019 Establishment Survey 4 500 4 000 3 500 3 000 * 2 500 2 000 1 500 1 000 * 500 0 * This graph reads: ROOTS 2019 has a respondent base of 3,032 respondents in SEM 10 (High) where as the Establishment Survey has a respondent base of 776 respondents in SEM 10 (High) 9
1. Credentials and Methodology 2. Highlights of the many categories 01 3. Buyer Behaviour DISCOVERIES 4. Media 5. Conclusion ROOTS HIGHLIGHTS 10
SOME HIGHLIGHTS 03 #1 USE THE INTERNET DAILY Total trendable sample Growth of internet use over 7 years – 3 ROOTS surveys 71 88 areas that can be trended 52 Each marker / dot = approximately 300 interviews 28 2013 2016 2019 2103 2016 2019 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Implications: 20 10 Questionnaire changes 0 inclusion of online behaviour * This graph reads: in 2013, 28% of decision makers use of the internet daily, this has increased to 52% and 71% in ROOTS 2016 and ROOTS 2019 respectively. The graph indicates all 88 areas and the increase in each area’s daily use of the internet.
SOME HIGHLIGHTS 03 #2 TRENDED REACH OVER TIME The stability of local community papers – 3 ROOTS surveys 88 areas that can be trended Health check 2013 2016 2019 67% 65% 66% 35% 29% 25% 22% 18% 17% 19% 15% 12% Local Papers Daily Papers Weekly / Weekend Weekly Magazine Papers * This graph reads: In ROOTS 2013, 67% of decision makers read their local paper, in 2016 this figure was 65% and in 2019, 66% read their local paper. 12
SOME HIGHLIGHTS 03 TRENDED REACH OVER TIME: JABAVU The stability of local community papers – 2 ROOTS surveys 2016 2019 83% 67% 22% 17% 5% 4% 3% 2% Jabavu Urban News Daily Sun Soccer Laduma Drum * This graph reads: In ROOTS 2016, 67% of decision makers in Jabavu read their local paper – The Jabavu Urban News, in 2019 this figure has increased to 83% of decision makers in Jabavu read their local paper – The Jabavu Urban News. 13
SOME HIGHLIGHTS 03 TRENDED REACH OVER TIME: BOKSBURG The stability of local community papers – 2 ROOTS surveys 2016 2019 87% 61% 9% 11% 5% 7% 6% 4% Boksburg Advertiser Daily Sun Sunday Times Huisgenoot * This graph reads: In ROOTS 2016, 61% of decision makers in Boksburg read their local paper – the Boksburg Advertiser, in 2019 this figure has increased to 87% of decision makers in Boksburg read their local paper – the Boksburg Advertiser. 14
SOME HIGHLIGHTS 03 #3 PEOPLE SHOP AT DIFFERENT TIMES OF THE MONTH 2013 2019 Implication: 56% Changes in behaviour 53% Convenience is key 33% • Increase in no. of stores 30% • Needs changing 12% opportunity More 12% to get into people's shopping 2% baskets 2% One bulk shop a month Twice a month/every two Weekly or almost weekly Twice a week or more and some top-ups weeks This graph reads: In ROOTS 2013, 56% of shoppers did one bulk shop a month & some top-ups and 30% did twice a month/ every two weeks. In ROOTS 2019 these figures have changed to 53% of shoppers did one bulk shop a month & some top-ups and 33% did twice a month/ every two weeks Roots Spark Release 2019
SOME HIGHLIGHTS 03 #4 ONLINE SHOPPING IS STILL IN ITS INFANCY Airline tickets 11% Holiday / accomodation 9% Movie / theatre 9% Clothes 8% Food & Groceries 6% Vitamins 5% Toiletries 4% This graph reads: In ROOTS 2019, 11% of decision makers bought airline tickets online 16
SOME HIGHLIGHTS 03 #5 INTERESTING TOPLINE INFO Banking: Cell phones: VODA ABSA FNB STD CAPI MTN NED COM CELL 20 BANK TEC BANK 17 40 38 C 2016 16 15 13 2016 15 VODA ABSA CAPITEC NED- 21 FNB STD COM MTN CELL 21 BANK BANK 38 35 C Telkom 18 2019 2019 5 15 12 17 In ROOTS 2016, ABSA had a 20% share of people with a bank In ROOTS 2016, Vodacom had a 40% share of people account. In ROOTS 2019, this has increased to 21%. with cell phone. In ROOTS 2019, it is 38%. 17
SOME HIGHLIGHTS 03 #5 INTERESTING TOPLINE INFO Clothes Shopping: Loyalty Cards: Mr PnP Clicks Edgars Smart Price WW JET Club Edgars WW 40 Shopper Thank U 40 32 23 Card 16 2016 2016 37 17 26 PnP Clicks Mr Smart Club Edgars Acker Edgars Price WW mans Shopper Card Thank Disco 33 43 very 33 28 35 U 2019 20 2019 15 15 In ROOTS 2016, Edgars had a 40% share of people who shopped for In ROOTS 2016, PnP Smart Shopper had a 37% share of clothes in the past 6 months. In ROOTS 2019, this decreased to 33%. people with loyalty card. In ROOTS 2019, it is 43%. 18
1. Credentials and Methodology 2. Highlights of the many categories 03 3. Buyer Behaviour DISCOVERIES 4. Media 5. Conclusion BUYER BEHAVIOUR & WHAT ROOTS REVEALS SOME MAJOR DISCOVERIES FROM THIS ARCHITECTURE 19
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 UNDERSTANDING BUYER BEHAVIOUR MATTERS BECAUSE • We are all in the business of building brands • We talk to potential buyers or users • This works best when we understand what makes them tick • And we can talk meaningfully • And actually influence what they do 20
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 BUYER BEHAVIOUR & WHAT ROOTS REVEALS TODAY, in the interest of time and relevance – we will examine 4 DISCOVERIES • What ROOTS Reveals • Anchored in Principles 21
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 DISCOVERY #1 • LOYALTY – (probably the most important discovery) • Humans are naturally curious & like choice. 22
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 ROOTS REVEALS PRINCIPLE The detail per local geographic areas of who your “Your consumers are just somebody else’s shoppers / users are consumers who occasionally buy from & who you share you” your shoppers / users with. Prof Andrew Ehrenberg 23
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 A loyalty card program doesn’t make you ‘sharing immune’ Spar WW SANDTON 18% 40% Top F&G retailers: 1. PnP 76% 2. Checkers 40% 3. Woolworths 40% PDM’S in Sandton who have 4. Spar 18% a PnP loyalty card and (Base: F&G past month) shopped for F&G at PnP (67,000) in the past month, Clicks also shopped at: 13% Checkers F&V 58% City/FLM 10% 24
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 DISCOVERY #2 • Randomness – people behave randomly 25
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 ROOTS REVEALS We know there are people in the market every week. But we PRINCIPLE don’t know who they are or “Consumer behaviour is random how to reach them individually. and unpredictable – Markets are thin so look for high adjusted for our mood or need at a aggregate propensities / particular point in time.” clusters or catchment areas. Prof Andrew Ehrenberg 26
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 RANDOMNESS – PEOPLE SHOP FOR CLOTHES AT DIFFERENT TIMES OF THE YEAR 2013 2016 2019 31 30 32 Implications: 30 Seasonality 26 25 25 Needs of shoes & clothing shoppers 22 22 Important to connect with shoppers on a continuous basis 9 7 7 7 7 4 5 4 3 Once a month or Every 2 - 3 months Every 4 - 5 months Every 6 - 12 months Once a year Less than once a more year This graph reads: In ROOTS 2013, 7% of shoppers shopped for clothes once a month or more often. In 2016, this dropped to 4% and in 2019, it is 3%.
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 RANDOMNESS – HIGH PROPENSITIES Looking at high indices Interested in Food / Cooking / Baking: Interested in Home & Décor • JHB North East • Rosebank • Kimberley • Nelspruit • Uitenhage • JHB North East Buy wine (once a week or more often) • Constantia / Plumstead / Hout Bay • Plett / Knysna / Sedgefield • Milnerton Areas with a high propensity for an interest in Food / Cooking / Baking are JHB North East, Kimberley & Uitenhage Areas with a high propensity for an interest in Home & Décor are Rosebank, Nelspruit & JHB North East Areas with a high propensity for buying wine (once a week or more often) are Constantia / Plumstead / Hout Bay & Plett / Knysna / Sedgefield & Milnerton
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 Soft Furnishings or Home accessories (across all ROOTS Footprints) 29% 18% 13% So much choice? 24,354 have bought soft furnishings or 11% home accessories in the past week 97,417 have bought soft furnishings or home accessories in the past month 10% Now Edgars Home 1,169,000 (16%) shoppers have bought soft furnishings or home accessories in the past 12 months Of the 7,295,000 shoppers in the ROOTS survey 29
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 Small electrical appliances in Midrand 35% 16% 14% So much choice? 813 have bought small electrical 14% appliances in the past week 3, 250 have bought small electrical appliances 14% in the past month 39,000 (77%) shoppers have bought small electrical appliances in the past 12 months Of the 51,000 shoppers in Midrand 30
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 DISCOVERY #3 • DECISION MAKING – People largely make decisions intuitively. 31
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 DISCOVERY #3 SYSTEM 1 SYSTEM 2 95% 5% Fast / Impulsive Slow / Thoughtful Unconscious / Instinctive Conscious / Deliberate Automatic Effortful Everyday decisions Complex decisions Error prone Reliable 32
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 ROOTS REVEALS Measures mindshare or PRINCIPLE mental availability. Shows just how competitive markets “ We think much less than are across categories ” we think we think. at a local level. Daniel Kahneman And shows how Make it easy to buy & customers are spoilt for easy to be thought choice. of. 33
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 COMPETITIVE MARKETS Area by area your brands compete For example: Medical Aids Sandton This graph reads: In ROOTS 2016, 27% of Sandton decision makers have a Discovery Medical Aid, and in ROOTS 2019, 36% of Sandton decision makers have a Discovery Medical Aid. 34
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 COMPETITIVE MARKETS Area by area your brands compete For example: Takeaways (P4W) Protea - Soweto This graph reads: In ROOTS 2016, 73% of Protea, Soweto decision makers have bought takeaways from KFC in the past 4 weeks and in ROOTS 2019, 72% of Protea, Sowet decision makers have bought takeaways from KFC in the past 4 weeks. 35
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 DISCOVERY #4 • THE LOCAL IMPERATIVE – • People choose to live (& shop) locally. • In geographic areas that suit them & are convenient to their life stages & lifestyles. 36
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 ROOTS REVEALS PRINCIPLE Identify high incidence areas for your users & Understand your stores based on people shoppers/ users at a with a likelihood to buy local level. your category. Geo-segmentation is your priority segmentation tool. 37
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 AVERAGE TIME PREPARED TO TRAVEL FOR… Differs by category & by area 13 MINS 15 MINS 21 MINS FOOD & GROCERIES A GOOD RESTAURANT BUYING A NEW CAR 20 MIN - DOBSONVILLE 20 MIN - GERMISTON 35 MIN – DIEPKLOOF 9 MIN – FAERIE 11 MIN 7 MIN - GLEN UMHLANGA AMANZIMTOTI (TSHWANE) In ROOTS 2019, the average time prepared to travel is 13 minutes to buy Food & Groceries, in Dobsonville shoppers are prepared to travel 20 minutes to buy Food & Groceries. In Amanzimtoti shoppers are only prepared to travel 7 minutes to buy Food & Groceries. 38
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 CATCHMENT AREAS: MALL OF AFRICA Midrand 26% Sandton 11% Randburg 6% Fourways 6% Centurion 4% Glenvista / Mondeor 4% Roodepoort 4% Kempton 3% Ruimsig 3% Southdale/ Turffontein 3% This graph reads: Of the people who have shopped at Mall of Africa, in the past 3 months, 26% live in Midrand. 39
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 CATCHMENT AREAS ARE LOCAL EG: MIDRAND Shopping centres visited before opening of MALL OF AFRICA (2016) and after (2019) 2016 2019 47% 75% MIDRAND 41% 41% CBD Noordwyk 35% 35% Shopping Centre
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 AREA PROFILES DIFFER Age:16-34 Age:35-49 58% 48% 92% Age: 50+ 34 47 40 Indian % % % Coloured 76% 53% 50% Black SEM 8 -10 58% of Chatsworth are in SEM 8-10, 34% are 16-34 years old and 76% are Indian.
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 COMPETING STORE PROFILES DON’T CHANGE SIGNIFICANTLY PER AREA In Randburg, PNP shoppers look like Checkers, Spar & online shoppers This graph reads: Of the shoppers in Randburg, 92% are in SEM 8-10, and 93% of the PnP shoppers in Randburg are in SEM 8-10 and 93% of the Checkers shoppers in Randburg are in SEM 8-10 and 91% of the Spar shoppers in Randburg are in SEM 8-10. And 95% of the Online Grocery Shoppers in Randburg are in SEM 8-10. 42
BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 ROOTS OFFERS LOCAL FLAVOUR – WITH BREADTH AND DEPTH Fourways 43% VS. 48% 54% VS. 15% 10% VS. 6% Had a beauty Music concert Have a home treatment or live event loan 39% VS. 26% 44% VS. 34% 3% VS. 1% Been to gym Had a headache Got married 59% VS. 82% 62% VS. 25% 2% VS. 2% Had hair done Flown - anywhere Had a baby * VS Average for Large Metro's
BUYER BEHAVIOUR BUYER BEHAVIOUR 04 #4 DISCOVERIES – A QUICK RECAP: DISCOVERIES ROOTS REVEALS ROOTS REVEALS 1. Per local geographic areas, who 3. Measures mindshare or 1. LOYALTY your shoppers / users are & who mental availability. you share your shoppers / users with. 4. Identify high incidence areas 2. RANDOMNESS of people with a likelihood to 2. There are people in the market buy your category. continuously. High aggregate 3. DECISION MAKING propensities / clusters or catchment areas. 4. THE LOCAL IMPERATIVE 44
1. Credentials and Methodology 2. Highlights of the many categories 04 3. Buyer Behaviour DISCOVERIES 4. Media 5. Conclusion MEDIA 45
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) MARKETING’S GOAL – INFLUENCING BUYER BEHAVIOUR Mental availability Making it easy to be thought of, by as many + Physical availability • Distribution • Store location people in as many buying • Access situations – as possible • Easy to buy 46
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) Most of us here are focussed on media/channel selection, Responsible for the creation / development of effective media strategies WARNING: USUALLY THE MOST EXPENSIVE PART OF MARKETING & BRAND BUILDING and THE MOST CRITICAL 47
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) Re-cap! NO LOYALTY To grow your brand : Attract light + Non-users They can be hard (and expensive) to reach and it’s even harder to get their attention (as opposed to regular users/shoppers who notice you more easily) 48
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) Re-cap! RANDOMNESS AND… We cannot predict who, when, or which of your products they will need (at an individual level) But the good news is that all these consumer insights have also given us a better manual/framework to help make smarter media decisions 49
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) OVERALL GOAL: MASS EFFECTIVE REACH NOT Frequency, or tight targeting, or only personalisation campaigns as we have been told (this is based on “loyalty” and dare we say, not a very good understanding of Buyer Behaviour) 50
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs our architecture) MAXIMISING QUALITY REACH IS THE NO. 1 PRIORITY (not frequency) “Not talking to enough potential buyers is like building a cathedral in the desert” – Hamish Priest Evaluate against Effectiveness first (value) & Efficiency second (price) 51
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) MASS EFFECTIVE (Quality) REACH Mental availability 1. Who + Physical availability 5. Where 2. Why 3. How 4. When 52
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) MASS EFFECTIVE REACH Large Relevant Audiences 1. WHO? All category users/buyers/shoppers Target the purchase NOT the person/profile Brand segmentation is a marketing myth 53
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) ROOTS REVEALS: LARGE RELEVANT AUDIENCES. Food & groceries in Randburg Local papers are read by 5 x more food & grocery shoppers* than any other print medium. 75% 5X 14% 6% 8% Randburg Sun Sunday Times The Star Move This reads: 75% of PDMs in Randburg who are wholly or partly responsible for food and grocery shopping read their local paper. The best read weekly paper is the Sunday Times with 14%. The best read Daily Paper is the The Star with 6%. And the best read weekly magazines is Move with 8%. * Wholly or partly responsible for food and grocery shopping 54
MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 05 ROOTS REVEALS: LARGE RELEVANT AUDIENCES. Shoes & clothing Eldorado Park Local papers are read by 10 x more shoes & clothing shoppers* than any other print medium. 10X 77% 8% 9% 1% Eldorado Park Sunday Times Daily Sun Drum Urban News This reads: 77% of PDMs in Eldorado Park who bought shoes or clothing in the past 6 months read the Eldorado Park Urban News. The best read weekly paper is the Sunday Times with 8%. The best read Daily Paper is the Daily Sun with 9%. And the best read weekly magazines is Drum with 1%. * Bought shoes or clothing in the past 6 months 55
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) ROOTS REVEALS: LARGE RELEVANT AUDIENCES. Motor vehicles in Pretoria East Local papers are read by 5 x more car shoppers than any other print medium. 5X 74% 14% 10% 12% Pretoria Record East Sunday World Pta News Move This reads: 74% of PDMs in Pretoria East who bought a new or second hand car in eth past 12 months read their Pretoria Record East. The best read weekly paper is the Sunday World with 14%. The best read Daily Paper is the Pretoria News with 10%. And the best read weekly magazine is Move with 12%. * Bought a new or second hand car in the past 12 months. 56
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) MASS EFFECTIVE REACH More likely to pay attention 2. WHY? The reason for consuming the media type Media environment must match the task orientation 57
MEDIA vs ( our 05 MARKETING architecture) (vs our architecture) COMMUNICATION 2. WHY? • Readers use their local papers for planning their shopping. • They prefer their inserts to be delivered in their local paper Behaviour created over time!! WHERE & the consistent exposure does a really good job of branding as well. . 58
WHY MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 05 PLANNING SHOPPING 88% 79% 62% Of CT North prefer their inserts delivered in their local paper Of CT Southern Suburbs read the inserts delivered in their local paper Of Soweto use their local paper to make F & G shopping decisions
MEDIA vs ( our 05 MARKETING architecture) (vs architecture) COMMUNICATION 3. WHEN? a) Continuity Aim for weekly exposure (NOT frequency!) 60
MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs our architecture) CONTINUITY In every 1 of the 52 weeks in a year, people are in your category “Catch them when they fall” – (trigger a response when they have a need) ? Plan for weekly exposure to remind the ever- ? ? changing pool of consumers who are ready to buy ? ? More likely to notice when “In Market” 61
WHEN MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 3. WHEN? +/-6.4 million Local papers in the market every week in SA 62
MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 3. WHEN? Cont. b) Recency exposure as close to the purchase occasion as possible 63
MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs our architecture) RECENCY NEED PURCHASE OCCASION AD ? 64
WHEN MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 05 Local papers mostly distributed from Wednesday - Friday 65
05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 4. HOW? Media that delivers large audiences first (and quickly) = the foundation Add niche/smaller options later if budget allows, but aim for adding Reach not Frequency (duplication) 66
MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) HIGH REACH & LOW DUPLICATION (Total 2019 sample) 4. HOW? 70% 69% 65% 18% 17% 5% 4% Local All Dalies Combined Daily Daily adds All Weekly Combined Weekly Weekly adds and Local and Local This graph reads: Of all ROOTS respondents 65% read their local paper vs. 18% of all daily papers. 70% of decision makers read both a daily & a local paper. Only 5% read any daily newspaper and NOT a local paper.
MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) HIGH REACH & LOW DUPLICATION ROODEPOORT EG: Roodepoort 4. HOW? 83% 84% 84% 4% 5% 1% 1% Roodepoort The Star Roodepoort The Star Adds Sunday Times Roodepoort Sunday Times Record Record & The Star Record & Sunday Adds combined Times combined This graph reads: Of all Roodepoort decision makers, 83% read their local paper – Roodepoort Record vs. 1% who read The Star. 84% of decision makers read both The Star & the Roodepoort Record. Only 1% read The Star and NOT the Roodepoort Record.
MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) HIGH REACH & LOW DUPLICATION (Total 2019 – internet) 4. HOW? 72% 65% 25% 7% Local paper Any news site online Combined Local Paper & Any News site online adds News Site Online This graph reads: Of all ROOTS respondents 65% read their local paper vs. 25% who read news site online. 72% of decision makers read both their local paper and read news site online. Only 7% read news sites online and NOT a local paper.
MEDIA 05 MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) HIGH REACH & LOW DUPLICATION FOURWAYS (vs internet) in FOURWAYS 4. HOW? 84% 70% 58% 14% Local paper Any news online Combined Local Paper & Any Online adds News Online This graph reads: Of all ROOTS respondents 70% read their local paper vs. 58% who read any news site online. 84% of decision makers read both their local paper and read any news site online. Only 14% read any news sites online and NOT a local paper.
MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs our architecture) 4. HOW? Local newspapers reach such large relevant audiences with a frequency of 1, that it is inefficient or not necessary to add another media type (with the same messaging). 71
MARKETING MEDIA COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 05 MASS EFFECTIVE (Quality) REACH Mental availability 1. Who + Physical availability 5. Where 2. Why 3. How 4. When 72
MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 5. WHERE? Physical availability a) High propensities Fish where the fish are 73
MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 05 5. WHERE? a) High propensities 60% 72% 68% 72% 69% Of people Of monthly shoes Of people with Of people who do Of people earning interested in food, & clothing WIFI / ADSL @ gardening read R51,000+ PI read cooking or baking shoppers read home read their their local paper their local paper read their local their local paper local paper paper Local papers = highest media reach per category 74
MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 5. WHERE? Physical availability b) Catchment areas Location of stores or branches 75
MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATION (vs our architecture) 05 5. WHERE? The real power of local / geography = relevance ACCESSIBILITY + AVAILABILITY 76
MARKETING MEDIA COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 05 5. WHERE? People shop and live locally EG: MIDRAND 2019 75% 73% Midrand Reporter Readership
MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) 5. WHERE? People shop and live locally EG: ALBERTON CITY 2019 66% 76% Alberton Record Readership
MEDIA vs (our 05 MARKETING architecture) COMMUNICATION (vs architecture) So it’s no surprise: Local papers continue to thrive! 1. WHO? 2. WHY? 3. HOW? 4. WHEN? 5. WHERE? Reaching large relevant audiences in an environment where people are primed to pay attention to shopping / services advertising 79
CONCLUSION 06 BUILDING FOR GROWTH • We are very proud of our strong & profitable newspaper brands. Our success is based on your support We know that’s not because you ‘love us’ so much or want a relationship with us, but because… They consistently deliver your messages to the hard to find large relevant audiences …for the past 40 years 80
CONCLUSION 06 OUR MEDIA BRANDS We aim to follow the sage advice and keep our brands MENTALLY AVAILABLE & PHYSICALLY AVAILABLE (known by almost all local residents) (distributed to the home – easily accessible) We would love to keep partnering with you to do the same 81
CONCLUSION 06 We are excited about the future of the local paper media category! So keep creating brands that stand out Provide appropriate messaging to influence buyers We are confident that we will continue to reach “the few” who do care & are interested – at the right time in as many weeks as possible, in the most effective & efficient way. 82
THANK YOU 83
You can also read