International Baccalaureate Middle Year Program Handbook 2021-2022
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
International Baccalaureate Middle Year Program Handbook 2021-2022 IB Mission Statement The International Baccalaureate aims to develop inquiring, knowledgeable and caring young people who help to create a better and more peaceful world through intercultural understanding and respect. To this end the organization works with schools, governments, and international organizations to develop challenging programs of international education and rigorous assessment. These programs encourage students across the world to become active, compassionate, and lifelong learners who understand that other people, with their differences, can also be right. Middle Year Program Entrance Requirements Downtown Doral Charter Upper School will be offering the International Baccalaureate (IB) Middle Year Program for students in grades 6th-10th. To keep in alignment with the IB mission statement, the Middle Year Program (MYP) does not exclude students from participating. The Middle Year Program (MYP) is an all-inclusive program targeting all students in grades 6th-10th. As an enrolled student at Downtown Doral Charter Upper School, in grades 6th-10th, the student is automatically enrolled in the Middle Year Program (MYP)*. *The school holds the right to change entrance requirement for the Middle School Year at any given moment. Academic Honesty Policy Academic honesty is a guiding principle of education and part of the cultural foundation of our school community. Academic and personal integrity means doing the right thing even when no one is looking. We encourage Downtown Doral Charter Upper School (DDCUS) students to lead a life governed by the values of honesty and personal integrity in all their actions. This also means upholding the academic honesty policies set forth by both DDCUS and the International Baccalaureate Organization (IBO). Upholding academic honesty helps to ensure that all
students have an equal opportunity to demonstrate the knowledge and skills they acquire during their studies. The policies and procedures in this page are informed by both the DDCUS mission and vision and the attributes of the International Baccalaureate (IB) learner profile. Academic Honesty and the IB Learner Profile To meet the goals of the Downtown Doral Charter Upper School’s mission and vision, as well as the IB Mission Statement, all IB teachers and students subscribe to numerous ideals that make up the IB Learner Profile. • Inquirers • Knowledgeable • Thinkers • Communicators • Principled • Open-Minded • Caring • Risk-Takers • Balanced • Reflective The primary qualities of a principled individual include integrity and honesty. It is perhaps for this reason that this is among the ten attributes valued by IB World Schools. It is this attribute that guides the Downtown Doral Charter Upper School’s International Baccalaureate Program Academic Honesty Policy. To become more knowledgeable, IB World students use critical and creative thinking skills to problem-solve and make reasoned, ethical decisions. Likewise, IB World students are inquirers who nurture a love of learning. It would be counterproductive for an IB World student to engage in academic dishonesty as doing so would rob the student of true and meaningful academic growth and development. Fostering the development of attributes such as being knowledgeable, thinkers, and inquirers complements the defining characteristics of being principled. Instructional Staff Responsibilities: All subject area teachers have the obligation to instruct learners in the proper ways of producing authentic work, beginning with an understanding of the IB learner profile. They must ensure that students understand how to create original work through both research and collaboration. Educators also need to make certain that students know how to properly cite sources (including when paraphrasing) in order to avoid plagiarism. The teacher’s role further includes helping IB learners to fully comprehend the Academic Honesty Policy and to provide resources for them to use at home and in the classroom.
Additionally, Teachers and Coordinators must not engage in the following actions that could result in maladministration: • The unauthorized rescheduling of an examination. • Failing to keep exam papers secure prior to an examination. • Providing undue assistance in the production of any work that contributes to the assessment requirements of the IB Diploma. • Leaving candidates unsupervised during an examination. • Allowing additional time in examinations without IBO approval. • Releasing an examination paper, or disclosing information about the paper, within 24 hours after the examination. Student’s Responsibilities: It is the student’s responsibility to produce and submit assignments that represent his or her own work. When the ideas of others are included, this information must be properly cited. Students should ask for assistance if they are uncertain about how to correctly acknowledge sources. Learners are also accountable for understanding the Academic Honesty Policy and to ask clarifying questions at any time, if needed. If students submit work that is not original (intentionally or unintentionally), they must be willing to accept the appropriate consequences. Family Responsibilities: Parents and guardians are expected to understand and support DDCUS’ Academic Honesty Policy. It is critical that they attend any meetings or conferences in reference to the academic honesty of their student(s). Parents and guardians need to help their children abide by expectations contained in the DDCUS Academic Honesty Policy and support them in the understanding of what constitutes authentic work and proper citing of sources. Families who observe any incidences of academic dishonesty are encouraged to report the incident to the student’s teacher or administration. Academic Honesty Committee (AHC) Responsibilities: The Academic Honesty Committee is composed of DDCUS’ instructional staff and administrators. The members of the AHC have the sole obligation of enforcing the Academic Honesty Policy with integrity and consistency. Practices of Authentic Authorship: Paraphrase by using different words to restate another person’s ideas. Paraphrased ideas usually have a sentence structure, style, and vocabulary different from the original author. Paraphrasing is an acceptable way to use a source. However, because paraphrasing still uses the ideas of another person, the source must be properly acknowledged.
Legitimate Collaboration by all team members and fair recognition is granted to all students who collaborated for their work. The student must be able to understand their role in the process of collaboration and be responsible for their specific work/task. Proper Citation of intellectual property as per the approved formatting guidelines (APA) must be used. Academic Misconduct The IB organization defines academic misconduct as behavior (whether deliberate or inadvertent) that results in, or may result in, the candidate or any other candidate gaining an unfair advantage in one or more components of assessment. Examples of Academic Misconduct: Cheating is defined as behavior that results in a student making a deliberate choice to gain an unfair advantage in an assessment situation. An accomplice to cheating is someone who makes the deliberate choice to help another individual cheat. Cheating includes but is not limited to: • Copying another student’s work (with or without his/her knowledge). • Copying assessment tasks. • Forgery. • Using unauthorized notes or other study aids during an assessment. • Submitting work as his/her own that has been copied. • Communicating with other students during an assessment. Collusion is defined as behavior that provides another student with help in cheating. This help includes but is not limited to: • Giving intellectual property (their own or others) to a student with intent to cheat. • Providing information on how to obtain another student’s intellectual property. • Providing information on how to obtain assessment tasks (prior to examination). • Forging documents for another student. • Helping copy documents for another student. • Providing unauthorized notes to another student during an assessment. • Taking an online assessment or assignment under another student’s identity. Duplication is defined as a student turning in the same work for different assessment tasks or different subject areas. For example, a student cannot use his/her own summative work from a unit in Language and Literature for a summative task in Science (unless an interdisciplinary unit has been established by the teachers and they have created a singular assessment task).
Additionally, a student cannot use a summative task that he/she completed for Language as a freshman as a task in Language as a sophomore, even if the task is similar. In other words, students must produce new work (meeting requirements for authentic authorship) for each assessment task assigned throughout their academic careers. Plagiarism is “using words, ideas, or products which belong to another person or source, without giving credit to the source from which it was taken” (qtd. in Carroll 3). Plagiarism can occur when a person tries to represent another person’s work as his/her own in order to obtain some benefit, credit, or gain. However, plagiarism can also occur unintentionally if a person does not acknowledge the work of others that helped him/her to complete the assessment task. Regardless of the motivation, plagiarism is unacceptable and can be avoided with proper teaching and learning. Other Misconduct During an Examination Session: • Including taking unauthorized material into an examination. • Participating in behavior that disrupts or distracts other candidates. • Disclosure of content of an examination paper within 24 hours of completion. • Acquiring testing materials through any inappropriate means. • Stealing an examination paper. Academic Consequences for Policy Breaches by Students: Academic misconduct constitutes a breach of regulations that could result in no grade being awarded in the subject concerned. Plagiarism and Collusion Infringement Chart Infringements Level 1 penalty Level 2 penalty Level 3 penalty Warning letter to the student 50% mark Zero mark and parent(s) with resubmission with resubmission Plagiarism Between 5-39 consecutive Between 40–60 consecutive More than 61 consecutive words Copying external words and incomplete words and incomplete copied and no acknowledgement of sources. acknowledgement of copied acknowledgement of copied source(s) given. source(s). source(s). Peer plagiarism Between 5-39 consecutive Between 40–60 consecutive More than 61 consecutive words Copying work from words and incomplete words with no acknowledgement copied or submitting somebody else’s another student. acknowledgement of copied and/or attempt to cite the copied work as one’s own. source(s). source(s). Peer plagiarism Student took reasonable steps Student took no steps to prevent Student actively tried to sell their Student lending or to prevent their work being their work being copied or work to be submitted by others. facilitating their work. copied. actively encouraged the copying of their work. Collusion Work of students show close Work of students has Work of students has extensive Coursework only and similarity. similarities— less than 30%— similarities—more than 31%—and/or when working and/or identical sections. identical sections. collaboratively.
Inclusion of Minor offense as determined Moderate offense as determined Major offense as determined by the inappropriate, by the school administrator. by the school administrator. school administrator. offensive, or obscene material Duplication of work Not applicable. Presentation of the same work Presentation of the same work for for different assessment different assessment components or components or subjects. Partial subjects. Complete reuse of reuse of materials; penalties will materials; penalties will be applied to be applied to both subjects with both subjects with reused materials. reused materials. Falsification of data Not applicable. Presentation of work based on Not applicable. false or fabricated data. Examination Infringement Chart Infringements Level 1 penalty Level 2 penalty Level 3 penalty Warning letter to the student 50% mark Zero mark and parent(s) with resubmission with resubmission Gaining access to Not applicable. Not applicable. Candidate in possession of partial or examination papers complete live examination content. before examination’s scheduled time Sharing of examination Not applicable. Not applicable. Candidate sharing partial or complete paper content before live examination content through any or during the means, including but not limited to, examination’s email, text messages and the internet, scheduled time, or even when shared information is within 24 hours after general. the examination Assisting another Not applicable. Before examination session. During examination session. student(s) in committing an act of academic misconduct Failing to report an Student is aware of the act of Student is aware of the act of Student is aware of the act of incident of academic misconduct via third party misconduct via indirect misconduct as a direct participant of misconduct unrelated during time and association. the act. place of act. Possessing In candidate’s possession but In candidate’s possession but no In candidate’s possession and unauthorized material surrendered or removed evidence of it being used during evidence of it being used during the in the examination during the first 10 minutes of the examination. examination. room the examination.
Exhibiting misconduct First non-compliance with the Second non-compliance with the Repeated noncompliance with the or disruptive behavior invigilator’s instructions. invigilator’s instructions. invigilator’s instructions. during an examination IE: Exchanging, passing, obtaining or attempting to receiving verbal or written information from other students during the examination completion time. Removal of secure Candidate accidently Candidate attempting to remove Candidate successfully removing materials such as removing secure materials but secure materials but identified by secure materials from the examination papers, identified by invigilators invigilators before leaving examination room. questions and answer before leaving examination examination room. booklets, from the room. examination room Investigation Infringement Chart Infringements Level 3 Penalty Zero mark or No grade for subject(s) concerned Not cooperating with an investigation, whether involved or not When a student shows any of these Providing misleading or demonstratively false information behaviors and/or refuses to submit Attempting to influence witnesses a statement. Showing threatening behavior to the person carrying out investigation or to witnesses Disciplinary Consequences for Policy Breaches by Students: Violations of the Academic Honesty Policy accumulate throughout a student’s tenure at Downtown Doral Charter Upper School and prior offenses are considered in assessing penalties. FIRST OFFENSE: • An issued infraction. • Notification to parent. • Informational referral to the student advisors and the IB coordinator. • If the offense occurs during an IB examination, the candidate will not receive an IB score for the course. SECOND OFFENSE: • Detention. • Notification to parent. • Informational referral to the student advisors and the IB coordinator. • Conference with the teacher, an administrator, the IB coordinator, the counselor, the student and the parent. • Potential placement on academic probation.
THREE OR MORE OFFENSES: • Informational referral to the student advisors and the IB coordinator. • Conference with the teacher, an administrator, the IB coordinator, the counselor, the student and the parent. • Ineligibility for school trips, competitions, and/or activities. Refunds are not given when a student is denied attendance due to behavioral issues. • Removal from or ineligibility for leadership positions, honor society membership, or other extra-curricular participation. • Removal or suspension from sports teams and other teams and/or clubs representing Downtown Doral Charter Upper School. • Potential removal from the class or program. Retaking Examinations or Resubmitting Coursework: The AHC will decide if the student found in breach of regulations will be allowed to retake his/her examination or coursework, and when such a retake could take place. Creation of Policy The Academic Honesty Policy was created by a committee which consisted of the IB coordinator, the head of schools, members of the administration, the entire administration, and each department head/subject group representative. The following members formed part of the policy making committee: • Mrs. Acevedo-Isenberg- Head of Schools • Ms. Chavez- IB Coordinator • Ms. Orta- Lead Teacher • Ms. Padilla- Instructional Coach • Mr. Martinez- Athletic Director • Ms. Moreno- Foreign Language Department Head • Ms. Cabrera- ELA Department Head • Ms. Wildenburg- Math Department Head • Mr. Stone- Social Studies Department Head • Ms. Novela- Performing Arts and Physical Education Department Head • Ms. Martinez- Science Department Head Informing Students, Parents, and Community At the start of each academic year, Downtown Doral Charter Upper School’s students are expected to thoroughly read and sign the Academic Honesty Policy Acknowledgement, stating that they understand and will abide by all regulations and consequences. Additionally, the
Academic Policy will form part of DDCUS’ IB Handbook, available for students, parents, and the community via our school website. Review of Policy The Academic Honesty Policy will be reviewed annually during the first leadership team meeting of the school year to ensure it is up to date with the principles and practices of DDCUS and the IB organization. Language Policy At Downtown Doral Charter Upper School, we believe that effective human communication in oral or written form bridges gaps among different types of learners and creates human connections around the world. We view language as a means to understand our diverse world and develop intercultural understanding and respect. Our language policy aims to provide the necessary skills required to inquire and explore a variety of local and global concepts, express ideas fluently and effectively in a variety of models of communication, respect other languages and cultures and accept different points of view in a caring and professional manner. Through the implementation of our language policy, our students will be able to evaluate their own learning to determine their strengths and limitations in the process of language acquisition. At Downtown Doral Charter Upper School, we are committed to providing equity of access for all our students. We promote an inclusive language learning environment. DDCUS recognizes the diverse cultural and linguistic background of our students and their families and is committed to providing an appropriate education for each of our students. Primary Language of Instruction: English is the primary Language of instruction. DDCUS will offer English at both the higher and standard levels. The school will provide for inclusion and equity of access to our students, including English Language Learners and students with special needs. • DDCUS provides additional support in English language acquisition for our English Language Learners (ELLs). Our school follows MDCPS guidelines and has adopted the World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment (WIDA) as its assessment for students’ English language proficiency. • Students assessed as entering, beginning, developing, or expanding receive classroom instruction in English for speakers of other languages.
Required Bilingual Language Program: In addition to the primary language of instruction, students have a choice of two language tracks: Spanish or Portuguese. • Within each track, there will be two programs based on level of language acquisition at the time of matriculation (determined by the Foreign Language Screening), the Bilingual Education Advancement Program (BEAP) and the Bilingual Education Studies Program (BESP). • Students are required to complete the summer reading assignments for the language track of choice before the beginning of the academic school year depending on their track, BEAP or BESP. • All students are expected to become fully bilingual and bi-culturally aware by the time they graduate, therefore, switching between tracks is not permitted. • The Foreign Language Program includes one mandatory foreign language class and one mandatory foreign language humanities class per year. • These courses are structured for complete language and culture immersion. They provide an opportunity for further support of a student’s mother tongue. • Through these courses students embrace their own cultural heritage and learn about the cultures of other students by participating in a variety of cultural events and activities adopted into the curriculum as per each language track. • Students in a language track that is not their mother tongue, will receive differentiation of instruction provided by the classroom teacher. • If the school does not provide sufficient exposure to the student’s mother tongue in its regular program, the student will be recommended for the extended hour program, an after-school fee based tutoring service for further assistance. Language Recognition: Downtown Doral Charter Upper School is an official International Studies (IS) school. To form part of the IS program means students of DDCUS, upon graduation of the 12th grade, will receive a diploma from Spain, opening doors of possibilities and opportunities for international study. Instructional Staff Responsibilities: • All teachers share responsibility in facilitating communication. Accordingly, all teachers will serve as language teachers and will ensure that various communication models are implemented in the classroom.
• All teachers participate in continuous language training, beginning as early as the August (summer month) before the start of the school year. • Academic language learning is integrated in the process of interdisciplinary planning across all curricula as evident in routine unit planning. Creation of Policy The Language Policy was created by a committee which consisted of the IB coordinator, the head of schools, members of the administration team, and each department head/subject group representative. The following members formed part of the policy making committee: • Mrs. Acevedo-Isenberg- Head of Schools • Ms. Chavez- IB Coordinator • Ms. Orta- Lead Teacher • Ms. Padilla- Instructional Coach • Mr. Martinez- Athletic Director • Ms. Moreno- Foreign Language Department Head • Ms. Cabrera- ELA Department Head • Ms. Wildenburg- Math Department Head • Mr. Stone- Social Studies Department Head • Ms. Novela- Performing Arts and Physical Education Department Head • Ms. Martinez- Science Department Head Informing Students, Parents, and Community: At the start of each academic year, Downtown Doral Charter Upper School’s students are expected to thoroughly read the Language Policy and understand their responsibilities as DDCUS student. Additionally, the Language Policy will form part of DDCUS’ IB Handbook, available for students, parents, and the community via our school website. • Parents are encouraged to join the school’s international Parent Organization (IPO). • Through IPO, parents of students in either language track, organize involvement in school and community events. Review of Policy The Language Policy will be reviewed annually during the first leadership team meeting of the school year to ensure it is up to date with the principles and practices of DDCUS and the IB organization.
Access & Inclusion Policy Downtown Doral Charter Upper School, alongside the IB organization, believes that all students should be allowed to demonstrate their ability under assessment conditions that are as fair as possible. In some cases, this will require access arrangements that eliminate disadvantages that may prevent students from demonstrating their level of attainment. According to the IB organization, access arrangements may be necessary due to: • Long-term learning support requirements. • Temporary medical conditions. • Additional language learning. The Access and Inclusion Policy is not only applicable during summative assessments but is to be used during learning and teaching; this means that the policy must be used during classroom instruction, classwork and related activities and tests. This policy must guide teachers in their plans to meet the access requirements of students for all their work during their time at Downtown Doral Charter Upper School. DDCUS is committed to working with parents, educational specialists, teachers, and student services staff to ensure that all students reach their maximum potential, regardless of exceptionality and/or condition. Principles of Best Practice to Assist All Students in Accessing the Curriculum and in Developing as a Whole Person Affirming identity and building self esteem Students learn better in conditions that promote social and emotional growth. Welcoming diversity and developing the whole child through the IB Learner Profile best achieves this. Valuing prior knowledge Learning occurs when students make relevant connections between their current knowledge and new knowledge. Through its transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches, the MYP and DP programs build on what students know as they make connections across the curriculum. Scaffolding Scaffolding instruction considers the student’s current ability to demonstrate knowledge and gradually builds from concrete to abstract understanding as supports are gradually removed and students become more independent in their learning. Extending learning Providing students with several different ways to learn and practice a concept extends their learning and fosters a deeper understanding. It is important that students recognize opportunities for learning outside of the school setting to become life-long learners.
Response to Intervention The Response to Intervention (RTI) process begins with either an observation conducted by the parent or classroom teacher. The findings are reported to the appropriate counselor who then, if applicable, formally implements the RTI process. RTI is a process designed to help schools find the appropriate interventions, modifications, and/or accommodations a student requires. During tier 1 of RTI the focus and purpose is high-quality classroom instruction. If a student is not producing in this environment, he/she may proceed to tier 2. Tier 2 is targeted intervention in small group setting lasting no longer than a quarter of the school year. If a student does not show improvement or too little improvement while in tier 2, he/she moves into tier 3. Tier 3 is intensive interventions and a possible comprehensive evaluation. In tier 3 a student receives individualized intervention targeting their skill deficit. If progress is not made, the student is referred for a comprehensive evaluation conducted by a medical professional for consideration of services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. Accommodations/Modifications Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) Students who show evidence of having an impairment via a psychological/psycho- educational/medical report are eligible for an IEP. A student’s IEP notes all accommodations and modifications provided to the student during instruction and testing. An IEP is issued for an extended period and reviewed annually to ensure accommodations and modifications are effective. Section 504 To be protected under section 504, a student must be determined to have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. A 504 plan is generated by the school’s counseling department and includes modification offerings that allow for equal access to the curriculum for the student. Classroom and instructional accommodations are notated in the plan. 504 plans are issued for a period and reevaluated at the end date to determine if an extension is required. Support Support for students with special educational needs includes pull-out assistance, collaboration, and/or consultation. A certified ESE teacher provides pull-out services during assessments. During pull-out, a student can work in a small group setting. Collaboration and consultation services are also provided by a certified ESE teacher. During collaboration, the ESE teacher provides one-on-one help during class time for the subject and time stated in the student’s IEP. During consultation, the ESE teacher consults with the general education teacher over the student’s progress as well as discusses effective strategies.
Maintaining Standards: Arrangement requests for a student does not give the student an advantage in any assessments; the same standards of assessment are applied to all students. Access arrangements do not diminish a student’s capacity to meet all assessment requirements during their coursework. Access arrangements for assessments are to reflect the student’s learning experience; therefore, students cannot request access arrangements at the time of assessment but must do so with anticipation. All grades and marks are awarded based on student work meeting set criteria without influence of any access arrangement a student may have. A student capable of receiving a subject result for a course without access arrangement should not request access arrangement for the assessment (exceptions can be made depending on the circumstances). No exemption can be granted for language subjects; all students, including those with specific learning challenges, are required to study two languages without any exception. Access Arrangements During the Course of Study: The access arrangements provided to a student must be planned at the start or early on during the course of study and be incorporated as the usual way to access classroom work and tests. The access arrangements provided for a student must: • be carefully individualized, evaluated and monitored • reflect the optimal support that the student requires • be based on current, not past, requirements • be drawn upon teacher observations in the classroom • be strictly based on individual requirements Requesting Access Arrangements for Assessments: The IB coordinator is responsible for submitting an application for access arrangements on behalf of a student with the support of the head of schools and consent from the student and/or legal guardians. Deadlines: Access arrangements for total Submitted no later than one year before the examination vision impairment and hearing session. challenges. All other requests for access Submitted six months prior to an examination session. arrangements. By November 15th for candidates registering for the May examinations session/ by May 15th for candidates registering for the November examinations session.
• All requests for inclusive access arrangements must be submitted on IBIS and must specify exactly which arrangements are being requested. • Requests for inclusive access arrangements will take a minimum of four weeks to be processed. The same applies for requests for re-evaluation of decisions. • If a request meets the standard eligibility criteria for the requested arrangement(s), the online tool will automatically approve the request. • If a request does not meet the standard criteria, it will be referred to the IB organization for evaluation. • Changes to access arrangements for anticipated and retake students would not normally be authorized. • All requests for re-evaluation must be submitted within one month after the school has received the decision made by the IB upon processing the request. Evidence Required: To submit requests for access arrangements, DDCUS must submit a psychological/psycho- educational/medical report or evidence from a language test for English Language Learners. Additionally, DDCUS must submit educational evidence such as a letter/observational report from the coordinator and/or the student’s subject teacher(s) outlining any difficulties that may be apparent in class plus a summary about the arrangements provided to the candidate in order to access learning and assessment. Educational evidence can also be provided by way of a detailed individualized educational plan for the student, or a sample of work done under timed conditions without the access arrangements that are being requested. All supporting documentation must: • Be legible, on a document with a letterhead, signed and dated. • State the title, name, and professional credentials of the person(s) who has undertaken the testing. • State specifically the tests or techniques used. • Be consistent with the coordinator’s request for access arrangements. • Be accompanied by a translation into English, French or Spanish, if it is not written in one of these IB working languages. All psychological/psycho-educational reports must: • State the candidate’s performance on nationally standardized psychological tests (where available and published, recent editions of standardized tests should be employed.) • Report results as standard scores, which have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, and not percentiles or age/grade equivalents. • It is not mandatory to test in all areas; the assessment may be in line with the candidate’s learning support requirements. All language test reports for additional language learners must: • State the standardized language test used. • State the language proficiency and performance benchmark results (WIDA).
Administering Access Arrangements for Assessments: DDCUS is responsible for making all arrangements for approving and appointing individuals required to support an access arrangement (such as a prompter or reader). The person providing support cannot be another student, a relative of the student, the subject group teacher or a representative from an advisory service where a conflict of interest may be apparent or perceived. DDCUS is also responsible for making all arrangements for assistive technology required for access to learning and teaching and IB examinations. Access Arrangements Not Requiring Access Arrangements Requiring Authorization Authorization • Taking an examination in a separate Access to Modification in the Presentation of room if it is in the best interests of the the Examination student or other students in the group. Candidates with visual challenges or specific • Arranging for appropriate seating to learning challenges may require modified meet the needs of the individual student. presentation of the examinations. Candidates • A care assistant. with total vision impairment may also need • A student who normally uses an aid (such questions adapted for accessibility (without as a colored overlay, colored filter lenses, changing the learning outcome). a Braille slate, a sound amplification Access to Additional Time device, a radio aid, a hearing aid, a visual A student with a learning, physical, sensory, aid, or a magnifying aid). neurological, medical, or psychological challenge • Use of buffers such as headsets, earplugs, may request additional time during learning and and individual workstations with acoustic teaching, and assessments. The amount of screens for students who are additional time is dependent on the severity of hypersensitive to sound. the challenge as determined by a medical • A communicator for a student with professional. hearing challenges. Access to Writing • Clarified assessment directions for a Candidates may require access arrangements student who has difficulties in reading or to provide written responses. Difficulties in attention, examination directions may be writing may arise due to specific learning clarified by the invigilator (examiner) or a challenges, visual challenges, visual designated reader. processing challenges, fine motor challenges, • A designated person to name colors in an examination for a student who has color attention challenges or other psychological blindness. or medical challenges. • Rest breaks if required due to medical, Access to Reading physical, psychological, or other Students may require support to read the conditions. text in the assessments. Difficulties in reading • A prompter due to attention issues, text may arise due to learning challenges, psychological or neurological conditions. visual processing challenges, attention challenges, visual challenges or any other medical issue that may affect vision. Access to Practical Assistance
A student with a physical, sensory, or medical challenge may require access to a practical assistant for tasks that require physical manipulation or movement unless it is the task being tested. Access to Calculators If a student scores 90 or less in a test of mathematical fluency, the student is eligible to use a four-function calculator (basic calculator performing only the functions of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division). *Students who require further access arrangements may request sign language interpreters and augmentative communication devices if they are intended to form part of the student’s regular learning. Exceptional Situations • If a student presents evidence of a medical or psychological challenge that prevents the student from completing work on time, the student is eligible for extensions to deadlines. A request for an extension to a deadline must be received before the normal deadline. • If a student presents evidence of a medical or psychological challenge that makes a deferral necessary for a student to access the program requirements, the student may defer one or more subjects. A request must be submitted at the start of the program and after registration for the assessment. • A student may participate in a maximum of three assessment sessions to successfully attain their IB qualification. • A student with a medical emergency may request the possibility of an alternative venue for testing. This situation is treated on a case-by-case basis and approval is not guaranteed. • Reasonable adjustments are changes to the assessment process not covered with any other access arrangements. These adjustments are determined by the IB organization after reviewing a student’s unique requirements. Access for English Language Learners English Language Learners are students whose current course of study and assessment is delivered in a language that is not their first, best or native language and whose language ability is below the level that is deemed linguistically competent. The eligibility for access arrangements will be based on WIDA scores conducted within one year of the assessment.
• Access for English Language Learners does not apply to assessments in language and literature and language acquisition. • In MYP, access for additional language learners can apply to examinations in individuals and societies, sciences, mathematics, arts, physical and health education, design, and the program core components. • In DP, access for additional language learners can apply to oral or written examinations in individuals and societies, sciences, mathematics, the arts, and the DP/Career-related Program core components. Creation of Policy The Access and Inclusion Policy was created by a committee which consisted of the IB coordinator, the head of schools, members of the administration team, and each department head/subject group representative. The following members formed part of the policy making committee: • Mrs. Acevedo-Isenberg- Head of Schools • Ms. Chavez- IB Coordinator • Ms. Orta- Lead Teacher • Ms. Padilla- Instructional Coach • Mr. Martinez- Athletic Director • Ms. Moreno- Foreign Language Department Head • Ms. Cabrera- ELA Department Head • Ms. Wildenburg- Math Department Head • Mr. Stone- Social Studies Department Head • Ms. Novela- Performing Arts and Physical Education Department Head • Ms. Martinez- Science Department Head Informing Students, Parents, and Community The Access and Inclusion Policy forms part of DDCUS’ IB Handbook, available for students, parents, and the community via our school website. Review of Policy The Access and Inclusion Policy will be reviewed annually during the first leadership team meeting of the school year to ensure it is up to date with the principles and practices of DDCUS and the IB organization.
Assessment Policy Philosophy and Purpose Downtown Doral Charter Upper School is dedicated to developing globally aware students - intellectually, socially, and culturally by providing a broad and balanced education. The Middle Years Program (MYP) and Diploma Program (DP) encourages students to make practical connections between their studies and the real world, preparing them for success in further study and in life. The Assessment Policy is a working document, developed by a committee of IB teachers, leadership staff, and administration, to provide clear expectations for teachers, families, students, staff, and administration regarding the assessment philosophy and practices at DDCUS. The primary purpose of assessments and examinations at DDCUS, is to support and encourage student learning through the gathering and analysis of information on student performance. Assessments and examinations in their various forms are a critical component of the educational journey and provide students with opportunities to determine the degree to which they have mastered content knowledge and skills, and to reflect on their progress. Assessments and examinations also provide teachers the ability to determine the degree to which students have attained mastery of content knowledge and skills, revise their curriculum and instruction to meet student needs, and to reflect on their practices. Therefore, at DDCUS, assessments and examinations are a means of ongoing communication between teachers, students, and families. Teacher’s Assessment Responsibilities • Prepare engaging and rigorous units/lessons and assessments. • Use a variety of assessment tools. • Ensure assessment correlates with unit objectives. • Provide students with rubrics with anticipation. • Ensure students understand assessment criteria. • Provide appropriate access arrangements when required and become familiar with the Access and Inclusion Policy. • Provide timely feedback. • Provide and facilitate self-reflection time for students. • Use professional judgment when evaluating a student’s level of achievement. • Reflect on students’ performance and revise instruction where needed. • Collaborate with colleagues teaching the same course to create units and assessments. • Participate in on-going professional development. Student’s Assessment Responsibilities • Be accountable for their learning, asking for aid when needed and taking time to reflect on their academic progress.
• Complete quality works and performances to the best of their ability. • Proactively track grades and marks. • Become familiar with the provided assessment rubric. • Be aware of due dates and meet them. • Uphold a culture of academic integrity by becoming familiar with the Academic Honesty Policy. Professional Development Downtown Doral Charter Upper School is committed to providing students with the most innovative education available. To achieve this goal, teachers participate in continuous professional developments. Two weeks prior to the start of the academic school year, DDCUS begins its professional development workshops offering teachers training in instructional strategies, technology, classroom management, and more. Teachers will continue to participate in professional development trainings on-site during designated training days. MYP and DP features are among these professional developments, securing time for teachers to discuss and collaborate on issues such as assessment practices. Collaboration Downtown Doral Charter Upper School’s administration will provide teachers with a schedule for frequent collaborate planning. Teachers instructing in the same course must collaborate on all matters including assessments. Assessment Practices Assessment strategies are methods used to gather information about student’s learning. They can be applied during the learning process or at the end of a unit to assess student comprehension and achievement level. Assessments can also be given before a unit of study to determine the student’s prior knowledge. The following are prominent assessment practices found at DDCUS. • Observations- teachers can assess student comprehension by engaging students in discussions or observing the whole class/individual student when completing tasks. • Process Journals- facilitates student reflection. It is required in some MYP courses. • Selected Responses- may be used during or at the conclusion of a unit in the form of quizzes and unit exams to measure student achievement and comprehension. • Open-ended tasks- students elaborate on their understanding of specific prompts through discussions and/or written tasks. • Performance tasks- Students are given an opportunity to demonstrate knowledge, skills, and understanding through creative presentations and project-based learning. • iReady Diagnostic- conducted at the start, middle, and end of year to track student progress.
• Mid-Year Assessments (MYA)- conducted annually to ensure timely progression of knowledge acquisition. • Florida Standards Assessments (FSA) and End of Course Tests (EOC)- conducted annually to keep in compliance with state regulations. • MYP eAssessments and portfolio- conducted at the end of the 5-year program to receive MYP certificate. • DP internal and external assessments- conducted at the end of the 2-year program assessing subject group and core (Theory of knowledge, extended essay, and creativity, activity, and service) of the program. Assessment Types Formative Assessments take place throughout the course of study. The purpose of formative assessments is to provide students the experiences to successfully perform on summative assessments. Examples: • Warm-ups • Exit slips • Portfolio • Quizzes • Observations • Process journals Summative Assessments are open-ended task created by the teacher. The purpose of summative assessments is to allow students to authentically demonstrate their knowledge and comprehension. It is student centered and inquiry based. Summative assessments are conducted at the end of a unit. Examples: • Performance tasks • Projects • Assessment tasks Formative and Summative Assessment: ● Align with each subject group’s aims and objectives, as well as the Florida State Standards. ● Connect to the different IB learner profiles attributes. ● Are diverse in method. ● Foster student inquiry and exploration. ● Are grounded in real-world applications. ● provide students multiple opportunities to display knowledge.
● Are frequent and ongoing. ● provide students with timely and meaningful feedback. Grading and Marking Downtown Doral Charter Upper School has adopted the following grading category percentages: • 60% Test, Quizzes, Projects • 30% Classwork • 10% Homework Achievement Levels describe the level of performance for a student on a summative assessment. The following chart shows the grade equivalent per achievement levels. Achievement Level Percent Score *0 is assigned to work that does not meet 8 95-100 criteria. 0 is not the equivalent of missing 7 90-94 assignment. Missing assignments will receive 6 85-89 no grade. Students are encouraged to re-do 5 80-84 summative work with a 0-achievement level. 4 75-79 3 70-74 2 65-69 1 60-64 Sum Subject Grade 0 59-0 1-5 1 6-9 2 10-14 3 Subject Grades represent a holistic level of 15-18 4 achievement in each subject. To determine a 19-23 5 student’s 1-7 subject grade, the teacher 24-27 6 considers all summative evidence of learning a 28-32 7 student has provided in each criterion. This is not an average of all achievement levels; it is an accurate representation of the common trend and determined by teacher judgement. The 4 criteria are added together and using the grade boundary chart, the final 1-7 subject grade is assigned. Reporting Assessments are critical tools used to develop effective teaching and should provide parents, teachers, and administrators with information to support student learning. DDCUS effectively communicates with parents and students by: • Providing students with copies of marked rubrics for criteria assessed. • Sending updates to alert students and parents of important assessment dates.
• Distributing interim numerical grade reports every 4.5 weeks and report cards every 9 weeks. • Hosting parent information sessions regarding standardized tests and other MYP/DP assessments. • Using an online grade book to allow parents continual live access to student’s grades. • Facilitating individual student / parent conferences that are scheduled upon parental or teacher request. Creation of Policy The Assessment Policy was created by a committee which consisted of the IB coordinator, the head of schools, members of administration team, and each department head/subject group representative. The following members formed part of the policy making committee: • Mrs. Acevedo-Isenberg- Head of Schools • Ms. Chavez- IB Coordinator • Ms. Orta- Lead Teacher • Ms. Padilla- Instructional Coach • Mr. Martinez- Athletic Director • Ms. Moreno- Foreign Language Department Head • Ms. Cabrera- ELA Department Head • Ms. Wildenburg- Math Department Head • Mr. Stone- Social Studies Department Head • Ms. Novela- Performing Arts and Physical Education Department Head • Ms. Martinez- Science Department Head Informing Students, Parents, and Community The Assessment Policy forms part of DDCUS’ IB Handbook, available for students, parents, and the community via our school website. Review of Policy The Assessment Policy will be reviewed annually during the first leadership team meeting of the school year to ensure it is up to date with the principles and practices of DDCUS and the IB organization.
Personal Project During year 5 of the Middle Year Program, students complete the personal project. Through this project, they will continue to explore the IB approaches to learning skills and learner profile. Students select an area of interest to focus on and with an assigned project supervisor, produce a creative product to demonstrate the learning. The personal project explores the cycle of inquiry, action, and reflection, as seen in the diagram below. (Photo credits of the IB Organization.) The personal project must not form part of the direct curriculum of any subject group. Each student will receive a project supervisor to help them through the process. Students may also decide to seek the aid of a community member that adds to their learning process. Students are to spend a minimum of 25 hours on their personal project. Components to be Evaluated Component How it is assessed Focus on topic leading towards a Evident in the presentation/report product/outcome Process Journal Extracts from the journal Report Four objectives Community Service Community involvement serves to develop essential qualities in a student. These qualities, as described by the IB, include self-awareness of strength and areas of growth, taking initiative, perseverance in action, collaborative working, and international mindedness. Downtown Doral Charter Upper School is committed to creating opportunities for students to become global leaders as they explore these important qualities. To achieve this, our students are encouraged to serve the community with an expectation of a minimum of 25 hours of community service by graduation. Awarding of Certificate Students seeking recognition of program completion, must achieve all components of the Middle Year Program. These components include: 1. Passing score on all subject groups 2. Passing score on Personal Project 3. Evidence of community service through action
You can also read